Connect with us

Politics

Rivers APC courts Fubara ahead of power handover

Published

on

The Rivers State chapter of the All Progressives Congress is making moves to bring the suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara into its party as the state prepares for a handover ceremony.

APC spokesman in Rivers, Darlington Nwauju, made the call on Tuesday while speaking on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief.

Nwauju said. “If I were the governor of Rivers State, on my return on Thursday, I would announce my defection to the All Progressives Congress.

“I think the governor should join the APC, and we would gladly receive the governor into our party.”

When asked if Fubara would lead the APC in Rivers if he defected, Nwauju responded that it was automatic.

“By the convention of our party, if he joins the All Progressives Congress, he becomes the leader of the party,” he added.

Nwauju also spoke about the administration of Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas (retd.), who has overseen the state for the past six months.

“APC has not officially demanded that Ibas give an account of his stewardship for the past six months.

“The budget approval he got was from the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. There is a committee from the House of Representatives overseeing the period of emergency.

“I do expect that the committee should be able to do due diligence, come up with that report, and tell Nigerians what they found out. It is one of their core mandates in the business of legislations and lawmaking,” he stated.

Meanwhile, President Bola Tinubu and Fubara are expected back in the country on Tuesday ahead of Thursday’s return to democratic rule in Rivers State.

See also  Makinde joins presidential race, warns against one-party state ahead of 2027

Tinubu cut short his vacation in France and will return to Abuja, while Fubara is due back from London.

Their arrival comes as the state administrator intensifies preparations for Thursday’s handover, which will mark the end of emergency rule in Rivers.

Tinubu had travelled out of Nigeria on September 4 for his annual holiday in France and the UK, originally planned to last until September 10, but ended his trip earlier than scheduled.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

I left Anambra debt-free, Obi insists

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, has insisted that he did not borrow money or issue bonds on behalf of Anambra State during his eight years as governor.

Obi, who spoke on Arise TV’s Prime Time programme on Thursday, said his administration left office in March 2014 without owing salaries, gratuities, pensions or contractors whose jobs had been executed, certified and verified.

The former governor was responding to questions over recent allegations by the Anambra State Government that his administration left outstanding debt and other liabilities for successive governments to service.

“Let me categorically state again: I, Mr Peter Obi, did not approach any financial institution to borrow money or issue bonds on behalf of Anambra State in the eight years I was in government.

“On the day I left office, the government of Anambra State, which I headed, was not owing any salary, gratuity, or pension to those scheduled to be paid by the state government.

We were not owing any contractor or supplier who executed his job, certified and verified—not one,” he said.

Obi said the loans being attributed to his administration were not funds he personally obtained from financial institutions, arguing that some of the funding arrangements were supported by the Federal Government.

“I didn’t go to obtain it. But what I’m saying, assuming that your father left you with an inheritance of N100m, and suddenly somebody comes up and says your father is owing N10m. Are you going to go to the market and say your father left you with debts? Unless there’s another thing, you’ll be unfair,” he said.

He explained that the Federal Government had selected Anambra, Ekiti and Bauchi states to receive concessionary multilateral support because of their performance in education.

“There’s a difference between I went to the bank to borrow money, then the Federal Government sees, ‘Oh, this state is doing well in education.’ They selected Anambra, Ekiti, and Bauchi and said, ‘These three states are doing well. Why don’t we give them a concessionary multilateral support to help them?’”

Obi said the funding, which involved the World Bank, was not obtained by Anambra from a commercial bank.

“Yes, and the World Bank,” Obi said, when the interviewer asked whether the funding was a decision by the Federal Government to provide support.

See also  Makinde joins presidential race, warns against one-party state ahead of 2027

“To support us. Not that we go to the World Bank and say give me this, not that we go to any commercial bank. And to even make it more… when it came, if you look at State Education Programme Investment Project (SEPIP), you will see that the drawdown was well after I left office.”

He added that even if the entire amount in question had been drawn down, there would have been sufficient funds left to cover it.

“I’ve assumed the whole and said even if that was the case, there was enough left to pay it, and the state will still be at the best financial standing,” he said.

Obi further argued that undrawn funds under a loan facility should not be regarded as debt incurred by the government.

“Even if I had gone to a bank and borrowed money—even if I had gone to a bank and borrowed money, but I did not spend the money, you cannot call it debt I left.

“Assuming I have gone to the bank and said, ‘Bank A, borrow me loan, Give me a loan of N10 billion. And they gave me a loan of 10 billion Naira, and I only drew down 500 million; you cannot now say I’m owing 10 billion because you know the amount. That’s why I said it is not proper public sector accounting.”

To support his position, Obi cited former Debt Management Office Director-General, Abraham Nwankwo, who he said served for 10 years.

He said Nwankwo had invited him to chair his send-off ceremony and publicly stated that Obi was the only governor in Nigeria who never visited his office to seek approval to borrow money.

“To even confirm this: the then DG… Abraham Nwankwo, who was DG of Debt Management Office, served for 10 years. The day he left office, at his send-off party, he invited me as the chairman, and he announced to everybody at that party that the reason why he made me chairman is that I was the only governor in Nigeria who never came to his office for approval to borrow money,” he said.

The dispute followed recent criticism from the Anambra State Government, which has alleged that Obi left outstanding external loans and other liabilities.

The state government recently challenged Obi to quit the 2027 presidential race, accusing him of leaving outstanding external loans and salary, pension and gratuity arrears, and of breaking earlier pledges on debt and timely payment of workers.

See also  Rep urges Atiku, Obi to step down for Tinubu ahead of 2027

Through its New Media Office and Commissioner for Information and Value Reorientation, Dr Law Mefor, the state alleged that eight external borrowings contracted during Obi’s tenure left an outstanding balance of about N127.4 billion (from $123.77 million) as of June 30, 2026, which continues to be serviced from federal allocations.

It also referenced salary arrears, including at the Water Corporation, and disputed Obi’s claim of leaving more than N2.13 billion in an ecological fund account.

Obi had previously vowed to stop campaigning if it was proven he left the state in debt or with unpaid certified contractor obligations.

NDC, Ok Movement tackle Soludo

The NDC and the Peter Obi-backed OK Movement have criticised Anambra State Governor, Prof Chukwuma Soludo, over his continued attacks on Obi as the political battle ahead of the 2027 presidential election intensifies.

The NDC National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, described Soludo’s attacks on Obi as a distraction, alleging that the Anambra governor was acting at the behest of unnamed political interests.

Director disclosed this in an exclusive phone interview with The PUNCH.

He said, “This is more like a distraction that Obi is having. Soludo is the man on the spot right now, apparently doing someone’s bidding to destroy his own brother. He seems to be taking this too far, and it is very petty of him.”

The Director-General of the OK Movement, John Ughulu, in an exclusive interview with our correspondent, also urged Soludo to focus on governing Anambra State rather than making Obi the centre of his political attacks.

Ughulu said the movement respected Soludo’s decision to support President Bola Tinubu and the APC in 2027, but argued that political differences should not turn into a continuous campaign against Obi.

He said, “We believe Soludo should focus his energy and attention on the task of governing Anambra State and delivering on the mandate entrusted to him by the people.

See also  2027: Tinubu Deserves Re-election, Every Nigerian Should Support Him – Ex-Lawmaker

“Obi left office as governor 12 years ago. The people of Anambra are mature and capable of assessing the records of previous administrations and comparing them with the realities they experience today. They do not need political actors to tell them how to evaluate the past.

“We equally respect Prof Soludo’s political choice to support President Bola Tinubu and the APC in the 2027 presidential election. Every Nigerian has the constitutional right to support the candidate or political platform of his or her choice.

“However, political disagreement should not become a continuous campaign against another individual.”

According to him, Obi’s growing popularity across the South-East and other parts of the country was a political reality that should be countered with stronger policies and programmes rather than personal attacks.

The OK Movement DG added that since Soludo was not a presidential candidate in 2027, there was little value in turning the election into a permanent contest with Obi.

He said, “The growing popularity of Peter Obi across the South East and other parts of Nigeria is a political reality that cannot be wished away. The appropriate response to popularity in a democracy is to present a stronger vision, policies and programmes, not personal attacks.

“The OK Movement has deliberately instructed its members and supporters not to be distracted by unnecessary or divisive exchanges. Our focus remains on issues that matter to Nigerians: good governance, economic development, security, institutional accountability, equity, justice and competent leadership.

“Soludo is not a candidate in the 2027 presidential election. If his political objective is to support the APC presidential campaign, he is entitled to do so. But there is little value in allowing the politics of 2027 to become a permanent contest with Peter Obi.

“We therefore encourage him to concentrate on the development of Anambra and allow the people to make their own independent assessment of every political leader and administration.

“The OK Movement will continue to promote issue-based politics, peaceful democratic engagement and responsible political discourse. We will not be distracted. Nigeria will be OK.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

One ticket, two visions; read about the battle between NDC and the OK Movement today

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the opposition Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi and his running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso  appear to have divergent views on some issues ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Obi and Kwankwaso hold different views on fuel subsidy removal and establishment of state police.

Daily Trust reports that Obi supports the removal of the subsidy but believes it should have been removed in a structured and phased manner, noting that the alleged mismanagement of subsidy savings should not have been an excuse for restoring it.Speaking at the Nigerian Bar Association conference in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, recently, Obi maintained that he did not support a return to the fuel subsidy era.

“I subscribe and maintain that you need to remove the subsidy. Mismanagement of the proceeds shouldn’t be the reason for not removing it. What we should have done is that when we remove subsidy, we would have given the people an alternative usage for the subsidy. What we have today is that the removal and attendant resources being recovered are also being mismanaged and stolen,” Obi had said.

But Kwankwaso said he supported the reintroduction of the subsidy in a modified form.

In a TV interview on Tuesday, the NDC vice-presidential candidate stated that an Obi-led government would bring back subsidy “in our own way.”

Asked whether it would be difficult for the NDC to campaign in the North-West, where there is support for the return of subsidy, Kwankwaso said, “No, no, no, look. We are bringing subsidy in our own way.”

“Of course, there are many ways. One, I can tell you: now we have a refinery built by a businessman, and I’m sure more refineries would be built.

“Now, if individuals in this country could build refineries, I see no reason why the government, under certain circumstances, will not build a refinery or refineries to the extent that we achieve the minimum requirement.

“What is the minimum requirement? The minimum requirement is for the people across the country to go to the filling stations and buy fuel at a reasonable price.

“We, in the NDC, will do whatever it takes, really, to put the price of oil down,” he said.

The position of the NDC presidential candidate and his running mate also differed on state police.

Obi had in a statement on his X handle, commended the State Police Bill, saying it represents a major legislative milestone in Nigeria’s quest to reform its policing architecture, but disagreed with the manner in which the legislation was processed.

He said the absence of broad public consultation and the speed with which the legislation was passed had created widespread suspicion about the motives behind the initiative.

Obi said, “The recent passage of the State Police Bill by the National Assembly marks a significant legislative milestone in addressing a long-standing demand of the Nigerian people.

Also, in an interview with Arise Television, Obi,  when asked if he believes in state police, retorted:  ‘’Yes I believe in state police. We will do whatever it takes to secure the country.”

But the NDC vice-presidential candidate, in the Tuesday interview, rejected the creation of state police in Nigeria saying the increasing calls for it were due to the inability of the current federal policing system to effectively tackle the country’s security challenges.

Kwankwaso insisted that the idea of state police emerged because of what he described as the failure of the federal or national police to effectively deal with insecurity.

He said, “I have always been against state police, and I can tell you the issue of state police came because of the failure of the federal or national police. I think it’s one of the big mistakes that government is doing.

NDC, OK Movement rift

Also, the brewing tension between the hierarchy of the NDC and grassroots volunteers under the auspices of the Obi-Kwankwaso (OK) Movement has spilled into the open after the executive leadership of the party disowned a 59-member Presidential Campaign Council (PCC) unveiled by the movement.

See also  Electronic transmission needs legal backing – Analyst, Arogundade

The move marks the first major public battle over political supremacy, organisational control and strategy between the party platform and the high-profile support group backing the Obi-Kwankwaso ticket.

Analysts describe the disagreement within the party over the structure of its campaign machinery as “untimely” and warned the crisis could have wider implications for the opposition ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The crisis escalated when the OK Movement, through its National Secretary Saadatu Sani, announced the formation of an independent campaign machinery led by the movement’s National Director-General, John Ughulu, as Director-General of the PCC. The announcement was swiftly rebuffed by the party hierarchy.

In a counter-statement titled “Re: Purported OK Movement PCC Announcement,” the NDC National Chairman, Senator Cleopas Moses, officially disavowed the movement’s setup, insisting that no campaign structure could be unveiled without formal approval from the party’s National Working Committee (NWC).

Adding weight to the party’s stance, the NDC National Leader Senator Seriake Dickson cautioned support groups against setting up alternative organs that compete with official structures.

While acknowledging the importance of support groups in grassroots mobilisation, Dickson insisted that all campaign activities must be channeled through formal party machinery.

“Support groups should work with the political party and its campaign structures rather than compete with them during the electioneering process,” Dickson noted, reiterating that party supremacy remains non-negotiable.

Why NDC, OK Movement are at loggerheads

Behind the public statements lies a fundamental conflict between traditional party governance and organic political mobilisation.

Party insiders revealed that the NDC leaders fear being sidelined by the support group’s assertive structure.

An NDC chieftain, who spoke on condition of anonymity, outlined the core conflict.

“The friction rests on organizational independence versus party supremacy. The OK Movement maintains it is a volunteer-driven force that will not be absorbed or subordinated into the NDC machinery. Conversely, the NDC views political authority through constitutional structures. Allowing parallel campaign councils creates competing power centers that undermine party discipline,” the source said.

The feud is further complicated by leadership disputes around Ughulu. While state and ward coordinators of the OK Movement have threatened mass withdrawal if Ughulu is removed, NDC leaders have resisted his authority, citing unresolved disciplinary proceedings over past primary disputes in Lagos.

Campaign council list ‘nonsensical’ – Dickson

The NDC national leader, Dickson, also criticised the OK Movement over the controversy surrounding the 59-member presidential campaign council list, describing the group’s actions as “nonsensical.”

Dickson addressed the issue on Tuesday following a meeting of NDC stakeholders in Abuja, where Babachir Lawal, former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), officially joined the party.

Rejecting the movement’s stance, Dickson emphasised that support groups must understand their boundaries and avoid attempting to rival the party apparatus.

“Support groups don’t compete with the political party that is sponsoring candidates. Support groups don’t compete for supremacy and space. They provide grassroots support and mobilisation. They don’t convert themselves to become critics of the political party sponsored. They don’t attack the political party sponsored,” he said.

Dickson noted that while support groups exist across all political platforms, including the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), none had attempted to usurp party functions.

“None of them will dare say they are setting up a presidential campaign council. It is unheard of. Nonsensical. And those who had a duty to educate and call people to order should do so,” he added.

Despite the reprimand, the NDC leader affirmed that the party recognises the value of grassroot support groups and remains open to collaborating with them, noting that he has previously held constructive meetings with Obedient groups.

See also  Jonathan cleared for 2027 elections as Turaki PDP hails court verdict; read details

Movement declares independence from party

Refusing to back down, Ughulu, in a statement on Wednesday, asserted that the movement remains an autonomous entity that will neither merge into the NDC nor surrender its nationwide structures.

“The OK Movement is an independent political organisation, not a support group created as an appendage of any political party. Its existence and internal administration are not subject to the internal management of the NDC. Political cooperation between the OK Movement and the NDC should be understood as collaboration rather than organizational subordination,” Ughulu declared.

He maintained that the movement is self-funded by its members and retains the right to design its own campaign strategy and field operations. While affirming that the group does not claim supremacy over the NDC, he warned against attempts to dissolve or hijack its network.

“No individual can simply declare that structure dissolved, transferred, or absorbed without the authority of the movement’s legitimate organs,” he warned.

He stressed that the movement operates through its own established nationwide structures across national, state, local government, and ward levels, adding that these assets would neither be surrendered, collapsed, nor merged into the NDC or any other political party.

“The movement’s structures were built through the commitment of thousands of coordinators across the country over time. No individual can simply declare that structure dissolved, transferred, or absorbed without the authority of the movement’s legitimate organs,” Ughulu said.

Reaffirming the group’s long-term strategy, Ughulu stated that the OK Movement remains united, lawful and fully committed to advancing the Obi-Kwankwaso presidential campaign through the 2027 general elections.

Rift may affect NDC’s chances at polls – Analysts

A Kano-based political analyst, Mustapha Isa, said the OK Movement operates outside the formal party structure and enjoys the blessings of both Obi and Kwankwaso because of its organisational strength and ability to mobilise resources more pragmatically than many party organs.

He noted that the recent rift between the NDC and the movement over the campaign council reflects a lack of synergy and highlights the group’s independence, which the party may see as a threat.

“Traditionally, what obtains in Nigerian politics is for the party to inaugurate its campaign council and assign roles to support groups. This is usually done under a coordinator or director of support groups, who harmonises their activities, just like the APC did,” Isa said.

The analyst maintained that the NDC was right to dissociate itself from the campaign council list released by the movement, warning that recognising it could encourage other support groups to set up parallel councils, thereby creating a cumbersome structure for the party to manage.

He added that the OK Movement, because of its allegiance to the candidates, believes the party cannot effectively manage campaigns or safeguard their mandate.

Isa advised that the way forward is for the party to accommodate the movement within its proposed campaign council and address its grievances, so that its wide network can be deployed during electioneering.

He urged Obi and Kwankwaso to personally intervene in resolving the feud before it worsens.

Speaking on the issue, a political analyst, Dr Ayinde Mosadi, said the disagreement within the NDC over the structure of its campaign machinery should be viewed beyond the immediate internal wrangling.

He warned that the crisis could have wider implications for the opposition ahead of the 2027 general election.

Mosadi said the NDC’s present crisis was partly rooted in the history of the party and the manner in which it had evolved with the entry of prominent political figures.

According to him, the party was initially a relatively small political platform that welcomed prominent figures such as Obi and Kwankwaso because of their political strength and the desire to win the election.

See also  Anambra govt counters Obi, alleges N127bn, $124m debt

A lecturer at the Department of Political Science, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State, Idowu Ajayi, warned that the ongoing rift between the NDC and the OK Movement could affect the party’s performance in the 2027 general election if not urgently resolved.

Ajayi said the manner in which the campaign committee was constituted had the potential to create divisions within the political platform, particularly if the various groups involved were not adequately carried along.

He said the disagreement should not be treated as an ordinary misunderstanding because it could affect internal coordination, grassroots mobilisation and the party’s ability to present a common message to the electorate.

According to him, any political organisation preparing for a general election requires a clearly defined structure in which the roles of the party, campaign organisation and support groups are understood by all stakeholders.

“The way the campaign committee was constituted is capable of creating misunderstanding among the different interests within the movement. If the issue is not properly managed, it could affect the performance of the party during the general election,” he said.

Ajayi explained that the major issue appeared to be the relationship between the authority of the political party and the independent identity of the OK Movement and other support organisations associated with the Obi-Kwankwaso political project.

He said while the party would want to maintain control over its official structures and candidates, the support movements would also expect recognition of their structures and contributions.

He warned that failure to resolve the differences could create confusion among supporters at the grassroots, particularly over who is responsible for mobilisation, campaign activities and communication.

“When supporters begin to receive different directives from different structures, it can affect coordination. At the ward and polling-unit levels, there must be clarity about who is responsible for what,” Ajayi said.

The political scientist also noted that continued public exchanges between the NDC and the OK Movement could shift attention away from the party’s candidates, policies and campaign message, while prolonged disagreement could deepen mistrust among the different interests within the political platform.

We’re awaiting nominations to PCC from Obi, Kwankwaso – NDC

Meanwhile, the NDC has ceded the privilege to nominate key members of the party’s Presidential Campaign Council to Obi and Kwankwaso.

The party said the duo would nominate the Director-General, Deputy Director-General (North), campaign spokesman, deputy spokesman, Head of New Media, Finance Director, Deputy Finance Director and other officials of the council in consultation with the party leadership.

The NDC stated this in a statement on Tuesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, following consultations between Obi, Kwankwaso and the party’s national leadership.

Director said the arrangement was designed to promote inclusiveness and cohesion in the campaign structure.

The spokesman explained that the organogram of the campaign council had been prepared since August and submitted to Obi and Kwankwaso for their input, while nominations had also been received from stakeholders nationwide.

He said, “The party leadership has given a free hand to the presidential candidate and his running mate to make nominations.”

The NDC said it would announce and inaugurate the council after receiving the candidates’ inputs.

“We also appeal to all our candidates at all levels to restrain their supporters and support groups to focus on the need to win elections. There are no battles to fight within the NDC. The common opponent to defeat is the ruling APC.

“We are committed as a party. The party has done its own and is ready to do more. The candidates and their supporters are encouraged to do the same,” he stated.

Source: dailytrust.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

APC challenges Atiku’s substituted service request on Tinubu’s credentials, read details

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress has written to the Federal High Court in Abuja to argue that an order for substituted service granted against President Bola Tinubu in the suit filed by Atiku Abubakar and the African Democratic Congress challenging his eligibility for the 2027 election was needless.

The party insisted that the President’s lawyers had already filed and served his defence before the order was made.

In a letter dated September 22, 2026, and addressed to the Deputy Chief Registrar of the court for the attention of the Registrar of Court 6 presided over by Justice Inyang Ekwo, the party said it only learnt of the order “through the media propaganda embarked on by the plaintiffs immediately after the order was made.”

It stressed that the plaintiffs “have not served any Enrolled Order on the APC up to this moment.”

The letter, signed by the party’s National Secretary, Ajibola Basiru, and made available to our correspondent on Tuesday, was written in respect of Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1888/2026.

Atiku and the ADC are seeking to disqualify Tinubu and the APC from the 2027 presidential race, principally over a discrepancy between the name on a National Youth Service Corps discharge certificate submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission and the president’s official name.

The order being contested by the APC was made on September 16, 2026, permitting the plaintiffs to serve court processes on the President through the party’s national secretariat, after his direct service had proved difficult.

According to the party, while it respects all courts in the country, inclusive of all orders made by them, it also felt “under a duty to bring it to the attention of the court when its processes are being abusively employed to harass the public and/or any of our members, particularly, the leader of our party, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR.”

See also  Makinde joins presidential race, warns against one-party state ahead of 2027

Basiru, in a six-point chronology, laid out what he said were the facts of how the case had progressed.

According to him, the suit was filed against Tinubu, the party and INEC as first, second and third defendants sometime in August 2026, following which Atiku “addressed the press after filing the action and informed the general public that he personally went to the registry of the court to depose to the supporting affidavit.”

The party said that although the plaintiffs served the second and third defendants, they, “for reasons best known to them, refused or failed to serve the first defendant,” Tinubu.

They added that the President had briefed a legal team led by Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) to represent his interests, as soon as he learnt of the suit through media reports.

Narrating the sequence of court appearances, the APC said the matter came up on the cause list on September 1, 2026, when one of Tinubu’s lawyers, Omosanya Popoola (SAN), informed the court of his readiness to accept service on the President’s behalf, having been so instructed.

According to Basiru, counsel for the plaintiffs “objected to the harmless request which ordinarily, the plaintiffs or any plaintiff should have gladly accepted,” prompting the court to adjourn to September 28, 2026, for mention.

 

 

The party added that on Tinubu’s further instruction, Olanipekun formally wrote the court on September 10, 2026, to the effect that his client had instructed his legal team to collect the originating processes filed by the plaintiffs and obtain certified true copies, and that Tinubu had also directed that his defence be filed immediately after the documents were obtained.

See also  Electronic transmission needs legal backing – Analyst, Arogundade

Based on that, the letter said, the President’s lawyers “formally obtained and paid for Certified True Copies of the processes on 11th September, 2026,” after which they filed a preliminary objection to the processes on September 14, and followed with “a defence to the action with a comprehensive written address” the next day, September 15.

Both the preliminary objection and the defence, the party said, were served on the plaintiffs’ counsel on September 14 and 15 respectively, “and his office duly acknowledged receipt of service.”

It was against this backdrop, the APC said, that it found it curious that the application for substituted service was moved on September 16 by the plaintiffs’ counsel “and the attention of the court was not drawn to the above facts, particularly that the first defendant’s defence in the action had been filed and served on the plaintiffs’ counsel.”

The party further told the court that it does not have Tinubu’s “consent or authority… to receive any processes in this matter on his behalf,” noting that the President has his own counsel of choice representing him in the suit, a fact it said was already known to the plaintiffs’ lawyers.

“It is for the foregoing reasons that the APC wishes to inform the court that the ex parte application for substituted service filed by the plaintiffs was unnecessary, given the trajectory of the facts stated above,” the letter read, adding that both the party and Tinubu “have filed their respective defences to the plaintiffs’ action, and are ready to prosecute the case accordingly.”

See also  Wabara BoT seeks INEC recognition for Turaki PDP

The suit at the centre of the dispute was instituted by Atiku and the ADC in August, asking the court to determine whether Tinubu ought to be barred from the 2027 poll over the alleged discrepancy between the name on his NYSC discharge certificate and his official name, and inviting the court to invoke relevant sections of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, along with provisions of the Electoral Act.

When the matter first came up for mention on September 1, the plaintiffs’ lawyer had told the court that his team had been unable to personally serve Tinubu with the originating processes, prompting the adjournment to September 28 for hearing.

At the same sitting, Popoola’s offer to accept service on the President’s behalf on the spot was turned down by the plaintiffs, who said they wanted to steer clear of any future arguments over technicalities in how service was effected.

INEC, on its part, has since filed a counter-affidavit describing the suit as an abuse of court process and contending that the plaintiffs lack the locus standi to institute the action.

The suit is one of a string of pre-election legal battles that have trailed Tinubu’s candidacy in past cycles, with disputes over service of process on him a recurring feature of such litigation.

The matter remains before Justice Ekwo, with the APC’s letter now placed before the registry ahead of further proceedings.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending