Connect with us

Politics

Bayelsa’s next Deputy Gov: Behind-the-scenes moves, political calculations, intrigues

Published

on

The sudden death of Bayelsa State Deputy Governor, Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, has triggered an intense political scramble across the state, with power brokers, party leaders and interest. With Governor Diri holding the ace, stakeholders are divided over whether Sagbama LG should retain the position — or whether broader political considerations, including 2027 permutations, will ultimately shape the decision, LINUS EFFIONG reports

Just weeks after surviving a bitter political storm, Bayelsa State Deputy Governor, Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, was gone.

The 60-year-old politician, who stood his ground when the state’s political landscape shifted beneath his feet, died on Thursday, December 11, 2025, bringing to a sudden end a career defined — in his final months — by loyalty, defiance and quiet resilience.

When Governor Douye Diri defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressives Congress on November 3, Ewhrudjakpo refused to follow. While several state officials crossed over with the governor, he chose to remain in the PDP, the party he had long identified with.

That decision set off months of unease within the state’s political establishment. Rumours swirled of a plot to replace him with a more compliant ally. In response, the deputy governor took the extraordinary step of suing the Bayelsa State House of Assembly to forestall any move against him — a suit he later withdrew after Diri’s intervention paved the way for an out-of-court settlement.

Then came the shock.

Ewhrudjakpo slumped in his office in Yenagoa and was rushed to the Federal Medical Centre, where doctors pronounced him dead. The suddenness of it all stunned the state.

Only hours earlier, at exactly 11:48am, he had posted photographs on his Facebook page showing him in a meeting at Government House with UNICEF Country Representative in Nigeria, Wafaa Saeed. There were no outward signs that it would be his final public engagement.

Tributes poured in from across Nigeria, many describing him as a “gentleman” and an unrelenting workaholic. Former President Goodluck Jonathan called him “a devoted steward of Bayelsa, a patriot, and a loyal servant of our state and nation.”

“Throughout his years in public service, he demonstrated an unwavering passion for the welfare of our people and earned the respect and admiration of many across the country,” Jonathan said.

But even as tributes continued, political calculations quietly resumed.

Behind the scenes, lobbying intensified as attention shifted to who would fill the vacant office. His death has now ignited a fresh debate over zoning and equity, with many insisting that fairness demands the next deputy governor emerge from Sagbama Local Government Area, the late Ewhrudjakpo’s home base.

For Bayelsa, the mourning is real. But so too is the power struggle that has already begun.

See also  PDP compiles delegates list ahead of national convention

The power play

If the battle for Bayelsa’s deputy governorship has a silent command centre, many believe it lies with Seriake Dickson.

The former governor and now senator is widely regarded as the most formidable force capable of shaping the succession conversation. Yet, in public, he has struck a careful tone — insisting he has not been consulted by Governor Douye Diri and stressing that the choice of a new deputy is solely the governor’s constitutional prerogative.

Few in Yenagoa take that at face value.

Observers of Bayelsa’s intricate political chessboard argue that such restraint is typical Dickson — measured words masking strategic patience. His relationship with Diri has remained outwardly cordial, even warm. He has openly supported the governor’s administration and pointed would-be aspirants away from his doorstep, advising them instead to lobby the man who holds the final pen.

But beneath that public posture, whispers persist.

Many believe Dickson is quietly rooting for his former deputy chief of staff, Hon. Ebizi Rosemary Brown Ndiomu, now representing Sagbama III in the state House of Assembly. Her emergence, should it happen, would not only preserve Sagbama’s hold on the office but also reinforce Dickson’s enduring relevance in Bayelsa’s evolving power matrix.

In Bayelsa politics, influence is rarely declared. It is inferred.

The Goodluck Jonathan factor

Then there is the shadow — calm but unmistakable — of Goodluck Jonathan.

No major political decision in Bayelsa is ever discussed without invoking the former President’s name. His influence in the state remains profound, particularly in his relationship with Diri.

Jonathan’s endorsement was pivotal to Diri’s re-election in 2023. At the time, the governor described that backing as “worth more than billions of naira,” a remark that underscored just how decisive it was. Diri has repeatedly acknowledged Jonathan’s role in shaping his political ascent — from the National Assembly to Creek Haven.

Now, as the deputy governorship hangs in the balance, stakeholders believe Jonathan’s voice — whether spoken publicly or whispered privately — could tilt the scales.

The uncertainty, however, lies in where that influence will fall. Will he align with Dickson’s perceived preference? Or does the former President have a different calculation altogether?

For now, Jonathan remains silent — and in Bayelsa, silence can be more powerful than speech.

Lokpobiri’s calculated presence

Hovering on the edges of the unfolding drama is Heineken Lokpobiri, whose growing visibility has not gone unnoticed.

A seasoned political operator, former Minister of State for Agriculture and Rural Development, two-term senator for Bayelsa West, and now Minister of State for Petroleum, Lokpobiri possesses both federal leverage and deep-rooted local networks.

His long-standing governorship ambition is no secret. Having openly expressed interest in succeeding Diri, his stake in the deputy governorship calculation is clear: whoever emerges could either strengthen or complicate his 2027 pathway.

See also  APC consensus push faces resistance in states ahead of primary elections

Political watchers are therefore studying his movements carefully. An endorsement here, a meeting there — each gesture is dissected for meaning.

In a contest shaped by loyalty, zoning, defections and future ambitions, Lokpobiri represents not just a participant, but a strategist with eyes firmly set beyond the immediate vacancy.

And as Bayelsa mourns, the manoeuvring intensifies.

Diri at the centre of the storm

At the eye of the gathering storm is Governor Douye Diri himself.

His measured silence — and the careful, almost clinical way he chooses his words at public events — has only deepened the suspense. In a state where every handshake is analysed and every smile decoded, Diri’s refusal to drop the slightest hint about his preferred successor has left Bayelsans guessing.

Behind closed doors, however, the permutations are thick.

A source close to the governor confided that Diri may be considering his Chief of Staff, Pastor Peter Akpe — not just a trusted aide, but also his maternal cousin. Akpe’s proximity to power, administrative grip and daily access to the governor make him a natural contender. Yet, for some, that closeness raises questions about optics and political messaging at a time when zoning and inclusivity dominate the conversation.

But Akpe is not the only name on the chessboard.

Prince Ebitimi Amgbare, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Niger Delta Basin Development Authority, is said to be leveraging federal goodwill. Widely perceived to enjoy a cordial relationship with President Bola Tinubu, Amgbare’s growing praise of Diri’s infrastructural strides has not gone unnoticed.

With Diri now firmly aligned with the APC and publicly backing Tinubu’s 2027 re-election bid, some insiders speculate that a subtle nod from Abuja could influence the governor’s calculus. Amgbare’s credentials — foundation member of the old Action Congress of Nigeria, loyal APC stalwart, 2023 presidential campaign council member and former Youth and Sports Commissioner — position him as a bridge between Bayelsa’s old APC structure and the governor’s new political home.

Whether that bridge is one Diri is willing to cross remains the unanswered question.

Casting the net wider

Beyond loyalty and federal connections lies another powerful argument: zoning.

Many political leaders insist that Sagbama, the home base of the late Ewhrudjakpo, should retain the office in the spirit of balance and continuity. To abandon that unwritten arrangement, they warn, could unsettle delicate political understandings in the state.

If Sagbama remains the anchor, one prominent figure is the Speaker of the Bayelsa State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Abraham Ingobere. Though representing Brass Constituency III, Ingobere has maintained a close and cooperative relationship with Diri. The governor has repeatedly praised him as “a stabiliser of the polity,” crediting him with fostering a rancour-free executive-legislative partnership since his re-election as Speaker in June 2023.

See also  Read how ADC presidential candidate may emerge

Yet, the field remains crowded.

Dr. Peter Akpe’s name resurfaces here too — hardworking, administratively savvy and deeply entrenched within the corridors of Government House. His connections to former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and First Lady Oluremi Tinubu add another layer to his political capital.

Then there is Dr. Dennis Otiotio, Bayelsa APC chairman from Nembe. A lawyer with a PhD and a history of fierce criticism of Diri — once describing his administration as “a punishment to Bayelsa State” — Otiotio’s political journey took a dramatic turn when he welcomed Diri into the APC fold in November 2025. Whether that reconciliation translates into consideration is another matter entirely.

In a quieter corner of the conversation is Christopher Ewhrudjakpo, elder brother of the late deputy governor and a serving aide to Diri. His possible emergence would carry emotional weight — a gesture of continuity and consolation — but whether sentiment aligns with political pragmatism remains uncertain.

Stakeholders weigh in

As lobbying intensifies, party chieftains are no longer shy about projecting their preferences.

PDP stalwart Christopher Abarowe argues that the governor must balance what he describes as a “political marriage” between the APC and PDP in the state. According to him, certain APC factions have already secured benefits, including commissioner slots tied to the David Lyon and Lokpobiri blocs.

“The foundational APC members — the old guard — should now be considered,” he said, listing figures such as Prince Ebitimi Amgbare and Briya Aganaba as worthy of attention.

On the other side of the divide, APC chieftain John Asawana insists the moral argument outweighs political arithmetic.

“To me, Sagbama should retain the position,” he said. “The state is now APC. What we should be considering is integrity. Whoever the governor appoints must be credible and not someone already compensated with political office.”

And so, the lines are drawn.

Loyalty versus zoning. Federal whispers versus local equilibrium. Sentiment versus strategy.

In the end, only one signature will settle the contest — that of Governor Douye Diri. But until the announcement is made, Bayelsa remains suspended between mourning and manoeuvring, waiting for the next move in a political drama that shows no sign of slowing.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

A three-horse race as Ekiti goes to poll

Published

on

Just days to the June 20 governorship election in Ekiti State, the political atmosphere is steadily reaching a crescendo as parties intensify last-minute campaigns and voter mobilisation efforts across the 16 local government areas of the state. In this report, ’YOMI AYELESO examines the factors likely to shape the outcome of the election, the strengths and challenges confronting the leading political parties.

The people of Ekiti State will on Saturday, June 20, head to the polls to elect a governor who will steer the affairs of the state for another four-year term beginning from October 16, 2026. Following months of political campaigns, consultations, grassroots engagements and strategic mobilisation, candidates and political parties are now making final efforts to consolidate support and secure victory.

Unlike previous governorship contests in the state, particularly the fiercely contested 2022 election, developments in the months preceding this year’s exercise suggest a different political reality. While the contest remains open, many political observers and analysts believe the incumbent governor enjoys a considerable advantage heading into the election.

Governor Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji of the All Progressives Congress (APC), popularly known as BAO, secured his first term in office in 2022 after defeating former Governor Segun Oni of the then Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Bisi Kolawole of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Oyebanji polled 187,057 votes, representing 53 per cent of the valid votes cast. Segun Oni garnered 82,211 votes, representing 23 per cent, while Kolawole scored 67,457 votes, accounting for 19 per cent of the votes.

As the state prepares for another election cycle, the political dynamics have shifted. While the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has confirmed that 15 political parties are participating in the poll, prevailing political realities indicate that the contest has largely narrowed to three parties — the APC, the PDP and the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

• APC and Oyebanji’s quest for continuity

There is little doubt that Governor Oyebanji enters the election as the candidate to beat. In the last three years and eight months, the governor, who hails from Ikogosi-Ekiti in Ekiti Central Senatorial District, has carved a reputation for inclusive governance and a leadership style that many residents describe as markedly different from those of his predecessors. His administration’s six-point Shared Prosperity Agenda has become the central pillar of his re-election campaign.

See also  South-East no longer Obidient, we’ll vote Tinubu in 2027 – Umahi mocks Peter Obi

Across critical sectors including education, healthcare, infrastructure, agriculture, economic development and social investment, the administration has implemented programmes aimed at improving the welfare of residents. The impact of these interventions has been felt among civil servants, pensioners, artisans, women, transport workers, youths and vulnerable groups across the state.

The governor’s achievements and consensus-building approach to governance have attracted endorsements from across political divides. Notably, four former governors of the state, Adeniyi Adebayo, Ayodele Fayose, Dr Kayode Fayemi and Chief Segun Oni, have publicly expressed support for his re-election bid. Influential figures within the state’s elite class, including legal luminaries such as Chief Afe Babalola, SAN and Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, have also identified with the administration.

Beyond elite endorsements, the APC enjoys significant structural advantages. The party controls all nine National Assembly seats from the state, 26 seats in the Ekiti State House of Assembly, the 16 local government councils and the 22 Local Council Development Areas (LCDAs). Over the past three years, more than 300 groups, associations, communities and traditional institutions across the state have declared support for Oyebanji’s second-term ambition. These factors have strengthened the belief among APC supporters that the party is on course for a convincing victory.

However, despite the favourable outlook, challenges remain. One factor capable of creating some internal discomfort is the outcome of the recently concluded APC State and National Assembly primaries. Of the six House of Representatives members currently serving, only three secured return tickets, while three lost out. Similarly, 20 out of the 26 members of the State House of Assembly failed to obtain tickets for another term, leaving pockets of dissatisfaction within the party.

Should Governor Oyebanji secure victory on Saturday, he would set a new political record as the first governor in Ekiti State’s history to win two consecutive terms in office.

• PDP’s Oluyede and the narrow road to victory

See also  2027: Why I want to succeed Sanwo-Olu as governor –Jandor

For the PDP, the June 20 election presents both an opportunity and a formidable challenge. The party enters the race weakened by years of internal divisions and factional disputes that have affected its cohesion and electoral strength. Nonetheless, its candidate, Dr Wole Oluyede, remains optimistic about his chances and has continued to project confidence throughout the campaign.

Oluyede, an indigene of Ikere-Ekiti in Ekiti South Senatorial District, is no stranger to Ekiti politics. He contested the APC governorship primary in 2018, later emerged as the ADC governorship candidate in 2022, and is now flying the PDP flag in the current contest. His repeated participation in Ekiti’s electoral cycles has helped maintain his visibility among voters.

His home town of Ikere-Ekiti, one of the state’s largest voting blocs after Ado-Ekiti, could provide a significant electoral base. The argument in some quarters that the community should produce a governor rather than continue occupying the deputy governor’s office may resonate with sections of the electorate.

The broader agitation for an Ekiti South governor also remains a factor. Since the creation of the state and the return to democratic governance in 1999, no governor has emerged from the southern senatorial district. Although zoning is not dominating campaign conversations as strongly as in previous elections, many residents of the zone still believe the time has come for power to shift southward.

However, any sentiment favouring the South Senatorial District may not exclusively benefit Oluyede, as ADC candidate Ambassador Dare Bejide also comes from the same zone.

Perhaps the biggest challenge confronting the PDP is the position of former Governor Ayodele Fayose, widely regarded as the party’s most influential figure in Ekiti politics. Fayose has openly endorsed Governor Oyebanji’s re-election and has consistently mobilised support for the APC candidate. Given Fayose’s enduring influence among party faithful and sections of the PDP structure, political observers believe his stance has significantly complicated the PDP’s pathway to victory.

The party’s deputy governorship candidate, Deji Ogunsakin from Ado-Ekiti, is expected to help galvanise support in the state capital, which remains the largest voting centre in Ekiti.

See also  APC consensus push faces resistance in states ahead of primary elections

• ADC battles structural limitations despite growing appeal

The ADC has also emerged as a notable contender in the election. Its candidate, Ambassador Dare Bejide, is a familiar face in Ekiti politics, having served as Secretary to the State Government and Nigeria’s Ambassador to Canada. The seasoned politician and elder statesman from Ilawe-Ekiti has positioned himself as a credible alternative to both the APC and PDP.

The ADC gained momentum following the influx of prominent opposition politicians who adopted the party as a coalition platform last year. This development generated expectations that the party could become a major force in the governorship race but happenings in recent weeks and months are suggesting the fact that the ADC might not constitute threat for the office.

Among its notable figures are former Deputy Governor Professor Kolapo Olusola-Eleka, former Commissioner for Information Akin Omole, philanthropist Funsho Ayeni and several other influential politicians. Despite these strengths, the ADC faces a significant challenge: the absence of an extensive grassroots structure comparable to those of the APC and PDP.

Political observers argue that while the party enjoys visibility among politically active groups and sections of urban voters, translating that goodwill into votes across thousands of polling units may prove difficult.

The party’s deputy governorship candidate, Ayodeji Babatola, a former APC chieftain from Ado-Ekiti, is expected to strengthen ADC’s appeal in the state capital.

• The final verdict

As Ekiti voters prepare to make their choices, the election appears, on the surface, to favour the incumbent governor and the APC, buoyed by widespread endorsements, strong grassroots structures and the advantages of incumbency, including achievements in office. Yet elections are ultimately decided by voters, and the level of turnout, voter sentiment and election-day dynamics will play crucial roles in determining the final outcome.

Beyond the contest itself, the June 20 governorship election will serve as an important test for Nigeria’s electoral process under the new Electoral Act 2026 and a major indicator of political trends ahead of the 2027 general elections.

tribuneonlineng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

APC, PDP trade words over Pantami’s political membership status

Published

on

A fresh controversy has erupted in Gombe State over the political status of former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Ali Pantami, as the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party laid conflicting claims to his party membership.

The dispute followed Pantami’s emergence as the PDP governorship candidate ahead of the 2027 general elections, after the APC primary election produced Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The Gombe State chapter of the PDP insisted that Pantami had validly resigned from the APC and is now a bona fide member of the opposition party.

The APC, however, maintained that the former minister remains its member because due process was allegedly not followed in effecting his resignation.

Addressing journalists in Gombe on Tuesday, the APC Publicity Secretary, Moses Kyari, said the party’s executive committee in Pantami Ward had earlier clarified that it neither received nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Pantami.

“As you may recall, 25 out of the 27 members of the ward executive committee publicly stated that they neither saw nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Professor Ali Isa Pantami.

“They maintained that the claim was merely a fabrication orchestrated without the knowledge or approval of the ward executive committee,” Kyari said.

According to him, the ward chairman, Alhaji Bala Galda, disclosed that the alleged resignation letter was received on May 23, 2026, despite being dated May 19, and was delivered by one Abba Pantami.

“Despite repeated requests, members of the ward executive committee have not been provided with a copy of the said letter,” Kyari stated.

See also  Kwankwaso reveals why the north settled for Peter Obi as most capable ally

He argued that under the provisions of the APC Constitution, the Independent National Electoral Commission guidelines and the Electoral Act, Pantami remained an APC member until the prescribed procedures were completed and verified.

“It is, therefore, our position that Professor Ali Isa Pantami remains a member of the APC until all due processes are properly followed and verified,” he said.

Kyari also dismissed claims allegedly made by Pantami during a televised interview on TVC that his defection to the PDP and governorship ambition had the blessing of President Bola Tinubu.

“We categorically reject this assertion. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a committed leader of the APC and has consistently demonstrated loyalty to the party. It is difficult to believe that the President would endorse activities that are contrary to the interests and unity of the APC,” he said.

He called on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify the issue to prevent misinformation.

“We, therefore, call on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify and dispel these claims in order to prevent misinformation and avoid misleading the people,” Kyari added.

However, in a swift response contained in a statement signed by its state Public Relations Officer, Abdulkadir Dukku, the PDP dismissed the APC’s position, insisting that Pantami had fulfilled all constitutional and legal requirements for membership of the opposition party.

“We wish to categorically state that Professor Pantami is a bona fide member of the Peoples Democratic Party, having duly complied with all the constitutional and legal requirements for membership of our party,” the PDP said.

See also  APC seeks cancellation of Kano by-elections over violence

The party further stated that it possessed documentary evidence confirming Pantami’s resignation from the APC.

“The PDP possesses all relevant documents confirming his resignation from his former party, acknowledged by his then ward chairman,” the statement read.

According to the PDP, the APC chairman in Pantami Ward personally acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter on May 19, 2026.

“The chairman of APC in Pantami Ward acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter in person on May 19, 2026, and subsequently posted it on social media, where it went viral,” the party added.

The opposition party described the APC’s repeated press briefings on the matter as unnecessary.

“It should be noted that this is the third time the APC has organised a press conference on the same issue, despite the facts being clear and well documented,” the statement said.

The PDP urged the ruling party to focus on preparations for the forthcoming elections rather than what it described as distractions.

“Consequently, we urge the APC in Gombe State to focus on preparing for the forthcoming general election instead of engaging in unnecessary distractions,” it stated.

The party also argued that the Constitution and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association.

“If the APC lacks confidence in its candidate, it should address its internal concerns instead of insisting that Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami must remain in the party.

“After all, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association,” the PDP said.

It added that the APC still had the opportunity, within the electoral process, to make decisions regarding its candidature if it believed its candidate could not effectively compete against Pantami.

See also  Atiku Abubakar's bloc shops for VP, eyes Obi, Amaechi

Reaffirming its stance ahead of the elections, the PDP said it remained committed to issue-based campaigns and providing credible leadership to the people of Gombe State.

“The PDP remains committed to issue-based campaigns and to providing the people of Gombe State with credible leadership, development and good governance,” the statement concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

Published

on

Following the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress and four other parties on Monday, ADC National Chairman Senator David Mark stated the judiciary is on trial and warned the Federal Government against political manipulation.

Stakeholders also called for sanctions against Justice Peter Lifu for flouting a superior court order, as the ADC assures supporters they will remain on the ballot.

Political parties and stakeholders affected by the Federal High Court’s controversial deregistration order welcomed the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the judgment.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja had on Tuesday ordered a stay of execution of the judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party, while delivering a stinging rebuke to Justice Lifu for flouting a May 22 appellate court order restraining him from delivering the ruling.

In a unanimous decision on Tuesday, a three-member panel led by Justice A. B. Mohammed condemned Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja for flouting a May 22 order that directed him to suspend proceedings before him, describing his conduct as the gravest form of judicial misconduct.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution,” the panel held.

The appellate court went further, invoking a Supreme Court precedent to characterise Justice Lifu’s conduct in the harshest terms.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is the highest form of judicial impertinence,” the panel declared, adding that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acted in such a manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

The court said it had a duty to assert its supervisory authority over lower courts and protect the integrity of the judicial hierarchy.

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This court has supervisory authority over the trial court. This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are obeyed. The application for stay of execution is hereby granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the panel ruled.

The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Lifu, had on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party, ruling that the five parties failed to meet the constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution, specifically, requirements related to securing at least 25 per cent of votes in certain states or winning seats in the 2023 general elections.

Earlier in Tuesday’s proceedings, INEC told the appellate court it was stunned by Justice Lifu’s decision to deliver the judgment, disclosing that the commission only learned of the ruling through media reports rather than any official notification.

INEC’s lead counsel, Mr Haliru Mohammed, told the panel that the commission had been aware of the appellate court’s May 22 order restraining the lower court from delivering the judgment, which had originally been reserved for June 5.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media. We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment,” Mohammed submitted.

The commission also aligned itself with the notice of appeal filed by the affected political parties.

Counsel to the ADC, Mr Shuaibu Aruwa, SAN, told the court that Justice Lifu communicated the judgment’s delivery to the party via WhatsApp, a disclosure that drew visible reactions from the bench.

See also  APC seeks cancellation of Kano by-elections over violence

Aruwa described the lower court’s conduct as an invitation to anarchy and urged the appellate court to invoke its disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution to sanction the judge.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay,” he added.

APC reacts

Reacting to the appellate court’s decision,  the ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the ruling offered a measure of hope for the judiciary’s credibility, though he was careful not to celebrate unreservedly.

“It indicates that the judiciary may still redeem itself. We are cautiously delighted but we insist that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place,” Abdullahi said in a telephone interview.

He called on the National Judicial Council to take urgent steps to rid the bench of judges whose conduct brought the institution into disrepute.

“We, therefore, hope that the judicial council will take urgent steps to purge the bench of judges who bring the judicial institution to disrepute,” he said.

The National Leader of the Action Peoples Party, Ikenga Ugochinyere, was more emphatic in his welcome of the ruling, describing it as a vindication of the party’s position from the outset and calling on the NJC to weed out what he termed controversial judges.

“There was no need to panic in the first place, and, so, this ruling is a vindication of our position from the get-go,” Ugochinyere said.

“We call on the NJC to weed out controversial justices who say one thing in the morning and another in the evening. These are the bad eggs giving the judiciary a bad name,” he added.

Ugochinyere raised broader concerns about public confidence in the justice system, warning that judicial inconsistency was eroding citizens’ respect for court pronouncements.

“Court pronouncements are supposed to be respected by citizens, particularly because they come from institutions established by law. But when people begin to hide behind technicalities, it raises concerns about the integrity of those institutions.

“How do we expect citizens to obey court judgments when many people no longer see justice as blind, but rather as something influenced by individuals and personal interests? That is the challenge before us,” the APP leader added.

He also noted that the controversy surrounding Justice Lifu’s ruling had sparked frustration across the country, with some of the anger directed at the presidency.

“This situation has generated a lot of reactions across the country. Many people are directing their frustrations at the President. Perhaps there is a need for greater clarity so that Nigerians understand exactly what is happening,” Ugochinyere said.

He nevertheless described Tuesday’s outcome as a victory for democracy and the rule of law.

“What happened today (Tuesday) is a victory, not just for democracy, but for the rule of law. We are happy because the courts have once again demonstrated their relevance in our democratic process,” he said.

Other parties speak

The Acting National Chairman of the Coalition of United Political Parties,  Peter Ameh, took a philosophical approach in welcoming the ruling, invoking the words of the philosopher Edmund Burke to frame the significance of the appellate court’s intervention.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” Ameh said.

He warned that what he described as hostile executive rascality and brazen judicial overreach must not be allowed to stand.

See also  APC consensus push faces resistance in states ahead of primary elections

Also, the ADC presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar said in a statement posted on his X handle that the ruling was a positive development, noting with particular significance that INEC itself had initiated the application for the stay .

“I welcome the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the Federal High Court judgment seeking the deregistration of our great party, the ADC, and four other political parties. It is particularly significant that INEC itself initiated the application for the stay,” he wrote.

Atiku, Mark protest

The former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar also criticised what he described as judicial contradictions in the ongoing legal dispute, warning that such developments had placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny.

“The disturbing spectacle of judicial contradictions and politically charged rulings playing out in our courts has placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny. As ADC National Chairman, Sen. David Mark, rightly observed, the judiciary itself is now on trial,” Atiku said.

He warned against any attempt to weaponise the courts against Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

“Any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s hard-won democracy through judicial manipulation is a grave danger to the Republic. If our democracy suffers further injury, history will demand accountability from those entrusted with dispensing justice,” he said.

Following the judgment given by Justice Lifu, the National Judicial Council has been urged to investigate Justice Peter Lifu over his decision to deliver judgment in a case that was already before the Court of Appeal.

The civil society organisation, Tap Initiative for FOR Citizens’ Development, on Tuesday in a statement called on the leadership of the judiciary to immediately investigate Justice Lifu over the judgment.

The call follows concerns over the alleged disregard for the hierarchy of courts and implications such actions could have on the judiciary and Nigeria’s democracy as the country moves closer to the 2027 general elections.

Justice Lifu had on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties over their alleged breach of Section 225(A) of the Constitution.

However, the judgment was reportedly delivered despite an order staying proceedings issued by the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal on May 22.

The decision has since attracted criticism from several quarters, with critics accusing the judge of undermining democratic principles.

In a statement signed by its Executive Director, Mbasekei Martin Obono, the group urged the NJC to, among other things, “Determine whether the decision was delivered in disregard of pending appellate proceedings and a subsisting order of stay;

“Examine possible breaches of the judicial code of conduct; Take appropriate disciplinary action if misconduct is established; and

Reaffirm the authority of appellate courts and the supremacy of due process within the judiciary”.

The group recalled that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, had consistently emphasised the need for accountability, discipline and ethical conduct within the judiciary.

It disclosed that it had formally petitioned the CJN, in her capacity as Chairman of the NJC, seeking an investigation and possible disciplinary action against Justice Lifu.

According to the group, the petition presents an opportunity to reinforce the principles of accountability and demonstrate that judicial independence is not incompatible with responsibility.

“Tap Initiative expresses grave concern that at the time the said judgement was delivered, there were subsisting appellate proceedings before the Court of Appeal in respect of the same subject matter in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026. Furthermore, the Court of Appeal had issued an Enrolment Order expressly granting a stay of proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2025, being the very proceedings in which the Federal High Court subsequently proceeded to deliver judgment.

“This development raises profound constitutional and procedural concerns, as it appears that a valid order of stay and active appellate proceedings were in force at the material time. If established, this situation would constitute a serious affront to the doctrine of judicial hierarchy and the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal within Nigeria’s constitutional order.

See also  South-East no longer Obidient, we’ll vote Tinubu in 2027 – Umahi mocks Peter Obi

“Tap Initiative emphasizes that the integrity of Nigeria’s justice system depends fundamentally on strict adherence to judicial hierarchy, procedural discipline, and respect for appellate authority. Any deviation from these principles risks creating conflicting judicial outcomes, eroding legal certainty, and undermining public confidence in the courts”, he said.

The group stressed that the judiciary remains the last hope of the common citizen, arguing that its legitimacy is sustained not only by constitutional authority but also by unwavering public confidence in its fairness, discipline and respect for the rule of law.

It therefore called on the NJC to treat the matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves in the interest of justice, democracy and national stability.

Meanwhile, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Senator David Mark, on Tuesday declared that the Nigerian judiciary, rather than the opposition party, is the institution facing scrutiny over the controversy surrounding the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties.

Speaking at the ADC Strategic Communications Retreat in Abuja, the former Senate President accused the judiciary of actions capable of undermining public confidence in the nation’s democratic process, while questioning the conduct of Justice Peter Lifu in matters relating to the party.

According to Mark, the outcome of the controversy will test the credibility of the judiciary and the ability of the National Judicial Council to address concerns arising from the case.

“The ADC is not on trial. Rather, it is the judiciary that is on trial and the nation is waiting to see how the National Judicial Council is going to handle this precarious situation,” he said.

The ADC chairman expressed concern over what he described as unprecedented judicial actions, alleging that Justice Lifu ignored an order of the Court of Appeal directing a stay of proceedings in the matter.

He said it was difficult to comprehend how a judge could be involved in actions that appeared to contradict existing court directives.

Mark further alleged that the judge issued conflicting decisions regarding the status of the party within a short period.

“It is strange that a judge can order the Independent National Electoral Commission to pronounce a party dead and in less than 24 hours put the same party on trial,” he said.

The remarks come amid growing political tension over recent legal challenges affecting opposition parties ahead of preparations for the next electoral cycle.

Despite the legal setback, Mark urged party members not to lose confidence in the ADC, insisting that the party would emerge stronger from the dispute.

“Like I have said previously, our members should not worry about the shenanigans of the ruling party. We will go through all these turbulence because we are up to the task. By the time we are through all these, ADC will come out stronger,” he stated.

The former Senate President also accused the ruling All Progressives Congress APC of attempting to weaken opposition forces through distractions, claiming that the governing party was struggling to defend its record in office.

He alleged that the President Bola Tinubu-led government is diverting attention from its challenges by targeting opposition platforms.

Addressing party communicators at the retreat, Mark charged them to craft messages capable of expanding the ADC’s appeal across political divides, including among members of the ruling party.

He challenged the communications team to develop persuasive narratives that would attract more Nigerians to the ADC project.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending