Connect with us

Politics

PDP govs, Wike camp move to open reconciliation talks after Appeal Court fallout

Published

on

Following Monday’s Court of Appeal judgment, governors of the Peoples Democratic Party and the camp of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, are moving to close ranks by exploring options to either constitute a harmonised Caretaker Committee or hold a unity convention aimed at preventing the party from collapsing.

PDP leaders, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly on the issue,  told our correspondent that both camps are holding marathon meetings to finalise the modalities and conditions for reconciliation.

This comes as Acting Chairman Mohammed Abdulrahman, Acting National Secretary Senator Samuel Anyanwu of the Wike-backed caretaker committee, and former Senate President Bukola Saraki called on all stakeholders to set aside personal interests, foster unity, and collaborate to strengthen the party ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The governors had earlier endorsed the Ibadan Convention held on November 15, which elected Taminu Turaki and other members of the National Working Committee for a four-year term.

They also oversaw the leadership transition from former Acting Chairman Umar Damagum to Turaki, before the expiration of Damagum’s tenure on December 9.

In a counter-move, a faction loyal to the FCT minister constituted a 13-member Caretaker Committee on December 8, appointing Abdulrahman as acting national chairman and Anyanwu as acting national secretary, among others, with a 60-day mandate.

Attempts by both the Wike-aligned group and the governors’ faction to hold meetings at the PDP National Secretariat, Wadata Plaza, on November 18, 2025, degenerated into physical confrontations. The Nigeria Police Force subsequently sealed the secretariat, which has remained closed since.

Both factions later sought recognition from the Independent National Electoral Commission, but the commission refused to acknowledge either group, leading to prolonged legal disputes.

On February 12, the Court of Appeal heard the consolidated cases on the PDP leadership crisis and delivered its judgments on Monday.

The appellate court, led by Justice Mohammed Danjuma, affirmed the decision of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which held that the processes leading to the PDP National Convention backed by the governors and held in Ibadan, Oyo State, on November 15 and 16, violated the Electoral Act, the Constitution of Nigeria, and the party’s constitution.

The court ruled that the convention that produced Turaki and other members of the National Working Committee was not conducted in compliance with the law, nullifying its outcome.

A source loyal to Wike’s camp revealed that since the Appeal Court ruling, leaders from both factions have been considering ways to safeguard the party and ensure it presents candidates for the 2027 elections.

He stated, “You see, since the Appeal Court judgment, what I am aware of is that our side here, if you listen to what His Excellency, the former Rivers State Governor, said, he called for peace and a truce. So, it is a signal that we are ready for reconciliation.

“The discussion is already ongoing. We are ready to reconcile and to move the party forward. It is in the interest of the party that we all work together.

‘’What we are still trying to sort out are the modalities. How do we go about it? Is it to organise a convention or to constitute a harmonised caretaker committee? All these are still part of what is on the table and under discussion. At the right time, Nigerians will be informed.

“For now, I assure you that the party and the leaders, from both camps, are already discussing reconciliation. If an agreement is reached, I am sure Nigerians will be informed. If not, then I am afraid it will affect many things and our members’ ambitions.”

An insider in the governors’ camp stated that they are ready for reconciliation, provided the PDP is allowed to function freely as an opposition party and present candidates for the 2027 elections.

He stated, “Reconciliation is vital for the party at this moment to preserve PDP. On our part, we are ready to reconcile with anyone willing to support the PDP in its efforts to thrive as a genuine opposition party. Our main concern, however, is that some people may not want the party to have a presidential candidate or candidates for key positions, which we see as a threat.

“Discussions among leaders are already ongoing, including in our recent meeting, on how to close the gaps among all stakeholders and PDP leaders. The focus is on putting the party back on track and determining the best approach to reconciliation.

See also  Four ministers to quit Tinubu’s cabinet ahead of 2027

“Whatever steps we take to achieve reconciliation will be guided by the PDP Constitution, the Electoral Act, and the Nigerian Constitution. We will consider all options, whether through a convention or a caretaker committee, and Nigerians will be informed in due course.’’

The party chieftain adds, “Reconciliation will only succeed if it is widely embraced by party members and the PDP is allowed to function freely as an opposition party. The party must be allowed to field a presidential candidate and present candidates for the 2027 elections, and we must address the issue of party structure. Any arrangement that undermines this objective cannot be considered a meaningful reconciliation. Then, we will come up with our plan B.”

Hinting about the reconciliation moves, Anyanwu recalled that the FCT minister, in his reaction to Monday’s judgment, said that the judicial decision has paved the way for the upcoming national convention set for March 29 and 30, calling for unity of purpose.

Speaking while inspecting the venue of the convention at the Moshood Abiola National Stadium Velodrome in Abuja, Anyanwu reassured PDP aspirants that there is no cause for concern regarding their participation in the party’s electoral processes.

“I just want to use the opportunity to tell our party faithful, all those members who want to contest an election under the platform of the PDP, that they should not be afraid.

‘’Initially, they thought that we didn’t have candidates in the FCT. They were thinking about who was going to sign their forms. But the Appeal Court has affirmed this Caretaker Working Committee, and by the time we have our convention, we will have a full-fledged National Working Committee of the party.

“And of course, if you are going to run in an election under the PDP, rest assured you will not be disqualified. Rest assured that somebody is going to sign your forms. Do not worry about the excuses given by those who have defected, that they were worried about who would sign their forms.

‘’By April 1st, we would have gotten a full-fledged National Working Committee. We would have been sworn into office. Of course, they are going to do our primaries. People will participate. And I am sure that the PDP is going to win massively across the country.”

In his remarks, the Caretaker Chairman, Abdulrahman, urged party members to remain united, assuring them that the forthcoming convention would be transparent, credible, and acceptable to all stakeholders.

He stated, “And with the leadership of our leaders and the position of the National Caretaker Working Committee, we are willing to do everything possible to make sure that we have a smooth national convention that we have never, ever had before.

“Unity is important for the party at this stage. So, we call on all members of our party to come so that we can work together for the progress of the party and democracy in Nigeria. We are not claiming that the victory is for an individual or a certain group. It is a victory for all. And we should all put the Appeal Court judgment aside and come to work for the progress of the party.”

Earlier, while addressing a press conference in Abuja on Tuesday, Abdulrahman stated that the caretaker committee remains the only recognised leadership of the PDP.

“I want to make it clear at this time that the National Caretaker Working Committee remains the only national leadership recognised by law and the party.

“The National Caretaker Working Committee is the only legitimate body that can present candidates in the build-up to the 2027 general elections. As such, I urge all stakeholders, party leaders, party members, and supporters to rally around the National Caretaker Working Committee as we prepare to approach activities towards the 2027 general elections.

“As we proceed with the preparations towards our national convention, we shall wait for the Certified True Copy of the judgment by the Court of Appeal to prepare ourselves for further defence of the party at the Supreme Court, if any. Most importantly, I want to call on all party stakeholders, leaders, and members to unite for the betterment of our great party. Enough of the litigation that will delay our activities towards the 2027 general elections and off-season elections.”

Additionally, former Senate President Saraki, in a statement through his media aide Yusuph Olaniyonu, on Tuesday, urged all PDP leaders and stakeholders to set aside their differences, respect the Court of Appeal ruling, and work towards conducting a new national convention in full compliance with INEC guidelines.

See also  NELFUND opens student loan portal for 2025/2026 academic session

“My own position is that the Court of Appeal has ruled. However, with the revised timetable by the Independent National Electoral Commission, it is obvious that there is no time to wait for the Supreme Court decision. Otherwise, we would not meet the deadlines for completing the process of nominating candidates.

‘’Also, uncertainty will continue to hang over the validity of the tickets issued to those nominated on the PDP platform. If our motive is to see that we do not jeopardise the chances of our numerous members who want to contest elections on our platform, then this consideration should be the priority of all of us in the party.

“One of the key essentials of a political party is to provide a platform for candidates seeking to serve the people by contesting elections. We should not defeat this purpose. It is for these reasons that I believe the only option open to all of us is to end all litigation and work with the arrangements that are on the ground for holding a national convention within the INEC timetable.

“From the beginning, some of us have warned and advised about the dangers of travelling this route. We know that it will only imperil the party. However, since we have found ourselves here, our focus should be on how to get back on the path of full recovery, stability, and progress.’’

Speaking further, Saraki said, “I know that at this stage, egos have been bruised. However, the difference between an ordinary man and a statesman, between a person and a patriot, between a follower and a leader is the ability to rise above the din and ignore personal interests to serve the larger common interests and public good.

‘’Thus, some leaders of the party who did not get what they desired from the courts should now consider the bigger interest of the PDP in the 2027 elections and beyond. This is a more noble, dignified, and responsible position to adopt than to embark on a journey that leads to nowhere.”

He declared that his concern is how to save and preserve the party for the benefit of the numerous members who have hinged their aspirations on the PDP platform.

Saraki continued, “There are many Nigerians at the grassroots who have been investing their time and resources in mobilising support for the party because they want to contest elections on the PDP platform. These are members who want to contest elections into the Houses of Assembly, House of Representatives, Senate, Governorship, and the Presidency.

“Feuding leaders should not allow their ego and personal differences to jeopardise, undermine, and defeat the aspirations of these honest, devoted and committed party members by depriving them of the opportunity to subject themselves to the verdict of the electorate. That is what these leaders will be doing if anybody continues with the litigation.

“The only viable option open to all of us is to sit down, discuss, and work towards holding an all-inclusive national convention at a time that will comply with INEC guidelines. What should be paramount to all of us is to adopt a give-and-take attitude that will ensure we accommodate all interests in the election of officers at the national convention. We should let the sleeping dog lie peacefully. There is really no time for continuous bickering and grandstanding.”

In a related development,  the PDP Board of Trustees Chairman, Adolphus Wabara,  Turaki, and Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde, have said the recent judgment offers a fresh opportunity to strengthen and reaffirm the party, noting that history would look favourably upon their actions.

Speaking during the expanded BoT meeting in Abuja on Tuesday, Wabara stated that the leaders have important decisions to make to safeguard the PDP.

“We need to find a solution. We need to talk about the judgment. In fact, the Board considers the judgment an order for the party to begin again. We respect the law. So, this is an opportunity for us to begin again. And that’s why we are all here.

“Having said so, it’s not a day for speech-making. It’s a day that we have to be very serious with the decisions we are going to arrive at, as we’ve always done with the Board. We obey the Constitution. We must work in accordance with the Constitution. And you can never go wrong if you abide by the Constitution and the rule of law.”

See also  Convention showdown: PDP govs resist Wike bloc’s move to dismantle committees

On his part, Turaki expressed concern that Nigerians, including both current and former PDP members, are troubled by the developments in the country’s political landscape and within the party.

“Since our convention in November last year in Ibadan, we strived to make sure that we keep the hope of millions of Nigerians alive in democracy, in party politics, through the instrumentality of our party. Indeed, we have worked hard to make sure that the fortunes of our party are increased. I leave you, indeed, and Nigerians to be the judge of whether the little we have done was positive and what impact it has made.

“In the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, yesterday (Monday), it becomes imperative that our leaders must sit down and then consider the situation on the ground and then come up with workable and implementable options that will save this party and indeed save Nigeria’s democracy.

So, there can never be a better time than now, especially when you look at the compacted nature of the 2026 Electoral Act that has been passed into law by the National Assembly.”

Speaking on behalf of the PDP Governors Forum Chairman, Governor Seyi Makinde described the period as a challenging time for the party.

“It’s a challenging period for us as leaders and members of the People’s Democratic Party. It’s also a challenging period for democracy in Nigeria. I have been talking to people of knowledge, people who have been involved in the political evolution of this country. And none of them has seen a political landscape like what we are witnessing today. I can only say, we are only two remaining, but we are not bothered.

“I can say personally, and on behalf of my chairman, that when the story of this period is told, when the story of democracy in Nigeria is told, they will find us on the side of the people. So please, I can only say that this period will also go away. It will pass away.

“So, whatever role we want to play as individuals and collectively as a party, we must be conscious of what history is going to record against or for us for this period. And I’ll leave you with a short remark. I’m sure it’s from the Holy Book. I don’t know where it is in the Quran, but in the Bible, I know where it is. And what I want to say is that weeping may endure for the night, but in the morning, joy cometh.”

Speaking to journalists after the expanded BoT meeting, PDP National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, stated that the governors’ camp is prepared for any reconciliation aimed at ensuring the survival of the PDP.

He emphasised that any reconciliation that reduces the PDP to an appendage or sub-party of the ruling All Progressives Congress cannot be considered true reconciliation.

He stated, “Number one is that the PDP will not die. Number two is that the PDP will be on the ballot. Discussions will continue tomorrow, and we are certain that firmer approaches to achieving this will be arrived at. PDP will not die, PDP will be on the ballot.

“The first point that came out of the mouth of Turaki is that we must reconcile. But the reconciliation must be on the basis of principle—the principles to make the party survive. The PDP is currently an opposition party. Any reconciliation that makes it an appendage, a sub-party of the ruling party, is not reconciliation.

“But any reconciliation that allows the party to survive, to allow the PDP to function as an opposition party that aligns with the wishes of the people: Political, emotional, spiritual, we are putting a finality to it.

“The reconciliation must be based on the principles that the PDP does not die. Immediately, we find ourselves at that common ground. We don’t want to be an opposition party that is an appendage of the ruling party.”

The expanded BoT meeting, which was attended by members of the Turaki-led PDP National Working Committee, BoT, Governors Bala Mohammed and Makinde, and state chairmen,  would resume today.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Read how ADC presidential candidate may emerge

Published

on

There are indications that the presidential candidate of the opposition coalition, the African Democratic Congress (ADC), is likely to emerge late in the month of May through the use of the consensus option.

Leaders of the party, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Nigerian Tribune on Monday that media reports which indicated that there is a breakdown in communication in the determination of the presidential candidate of the party are false, as they added that the formal process aimed at determining the candidate has not begun.

“What we agreed on is that we will not allow the issue of presidential standard-bearer to divide the coalition. That is what our opponents believe would happen, but we are certain to beat them to the game. The United Opposition Movement will work tirelessly to midwife a consensus arrangement because it is the cheaper option. It is only when a consensus is difficult to attain that we will go to the second option, which is the direct primary option,” a source stated.

Another source in the know within the party said that the party leaders have not started discussing the matter because of the ongoing suit at the apex court.

He said: “The story of a decision over the issue of a consensus candidate is APC propaganda. No one has even started discussing the matter. Everyone is waiting for the Supreme Court decision. Obviously, in any party that does not have a candidate, people would have opinions, and that is what democracy is all about. Calling that a division is not right.”

See also  Rivers APC rejects Fubara’s impeachment

The source further stated that the party would guard its loins tightly, knowing that the prying eyes of the ruling party are on the opposition coalition, with a view to destabilising it.

Further investigations, however, confirmed that the process by which the presidential candidate would emerge has already been mapped out.

“First, the party would take a shot at the consensus option. It will look at all the available resource materials and the likely candidate who can best defeat the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). There are issues of zoning, which the party has also downplayed. We are not sure yet at what stage that would come up. But we are so far assured of aspirants from the North and the South.”

The presidential hopefuls in the ADC include the former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar,  the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 election, Mr. Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, and the former Minister of Transport, Rotimi Amaechi. Obi and Amaechi come from the South-East and the South-South, respectively, while Atiku hails from Adamawa in the North-East, and Kwankwaso hails from Kano, in the North-Western part of the country.

Although the APC and the former ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), have zoning arrangements which recognise power rotation between the North and the Southern divides of the country, something the ADC has yet to come clean about.

Meanwhile, the Grassroots Mobilisation Network (GMN), a support group of the ADC, has criticised the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, over comments it claims suggest backing for individuals expelled from the party.

See also  Ganduje and Yusuf meet, call for unity

In a statement signed by Idris Bala Musa and issued on Monday in Abuja, the group accused Gbajabiamila of indicating support for Bala Nafiu and Honourable Leke Abejide in efforts to reclaim influence within the ADC.

GMN described the remarks as troubling and called on Nigerians to urge those in the presidency to safeguard democratic principles, warning against what it termed attempts to destabilise opposition parties.

According to the group, Gbajabiamila made the comments during a reception marking Abejide’s 20th wedding anniversary and his wife’s 50th birthday.

The ADC had, at its last national convention, ratified the expulsion of both Abejide and Nafiu over alleged anti-party activities.

GMN said the comments, if accurate, point to “a disturbing level of interference” in the affairs of an opposition party and warned of broader implications for Nigeria’s democratic system.

The group further alleged that such actions suggest a broader strategy aimed at suppressing opposition voices ahead of future elections.

GMN argued that any attempt to impose individuals on a political party violates constitutional provisions, citing Section 40 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees freedom of association, as well as relevant sections of the Electoral Act governing party autonomy.

tribuneonline.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

I did my best as President, Jonathan counters Atiku

Published

on

Former President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan, has defended his administration, adding that he did his best while in office.

His reply followed the criticism of his administration by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar during an interview on Prime Time on Arise TV.

Atiku, a presidential aspirant on the platform of the African Democratic Congress, had, during the interview, described Jonathan as inexperienced, stating that he made mistakes while he held sway.

Atiku is contesting the presidential ticket with the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 election, Peter Obi, former Minister of Transport, Rotimi Amaechi and former governor of Kano State, Rabiu Kwankwaso.

In the interview, Atiku played down the prominence of Kwankwaso and Tambuwal in the North, limited Obi’s support base to the South-East and Amaechi’s strength to the South-South.

He also expressed disappointment in President Bola Tinubu’s administration and labelled ex-President Jonathan as inexperienced.

“I know Goodluck Jonathan very well. He is a decent young man, but also inexperienced, and I believe that contributed to his inability to manage the affairs of the country, particularly when he was faced with challenges,” he said.

Speaking at the 2025 Association of Retired Career Ambassadors of Nigeria awards ceremony in Abuja, on Monday, Jonathan said nobody who becomes a governor or president would say he did not make mistakes.

“So not too long ago, a very senior politician said, ‘Oh, Jonathan was too young and probably that’s why he made mistakes.’

“If I made mistakes, yes, nobody who becomes a governor or a president will say you did not make mistakes. Even when you promote yourself to the level of a god, you become a deity.

“All human beings must make mistakes. I became president in 2010 at the age of 53. I left in 2015 at the age of 58, and they say I was too young. Must it have been 100 years before I ran the affairs of the state?”

See also  2027: Be wary of politicians with unrealistic promises, Makinde warns

The former President defended his decisions in office, saying that while mistakes are inevitable, he did his best.

The former president highlighted Nigeria’s diplomatic achievements during his tenure, particularly its election to the United Nations Security Council.

“I’m talking to diplomats, so I can say that during my period, I knew what I did for us to appear in the UN Security Council two times… If I were so naive, I don’t think I would have been able to navigate through that process,” he said.

Speaking on the state of the West African countries, Jonathan stressed that political stability remains a critical foundation for economic development, warning that unstable governance systems will continue to hinder progress across West Africa.

He noted that while the founding fathers of ECOWAS had a strong vision, the bloc continues to face instability due to political challenges in member states.

He observed that, particularly in enforcing democratic norms among member states, ECOWAS has suffered setbacks, adding that although the bloc was initially focused on economic cooperation, the region cannot make tangible progress if its societies remain politically unstable.

He stressed, “We cannot progress economically if we are very unstable societies politically.”

He added that efforts to promote democracy and good governance often clash with national sovereignty, making consensus among leaders difficult.

“That means that ECOWAS must interfere with the internal affairs of the states, and the issue of sovereignty becomes a problem,” he said.

Jonathan further urged West African leaders to take collective responsibility for stabilising the region, stating, “the heads of states of ECOWAS must continue to work together and agree on concrete terms and make sure that the sub-region is politically stable.”

See also  Anambra Election: Peter Obi Votes, Laments Vote Buying (Photos)

He noted that the region’s ambition for economic integration could not succeed without strong democratic institutions.

Jonathan also called on Nigerian diplomats to document the country’s foreign policy experiences to guide future administrations, noting that such efforts would help leaders make informed decisions in international relations.

Paying tribute to the founders of ECOWAS, including former Head of State, Yakubu Gowon, Jonathan praised their foresight in establishing the regional bloc in 1975, describing the vision of a united and economically integrated West Africa as “bold, ambitious, and necessary.”

Gowon, who was also honoured at the awards ceremony, reflected on the origins of ECOWAS, attributing its formation to post-war diplomatic engagements and regional cooperation.

According to him, “it was as a result of the various efforts of all Nigerians when we went through a very difficult period, and I had to go to the various countries to say thank you.”

He explained that discussions with regional leaders revealed a common pattern in bilateral agreements, which inspired a broader vision for collective integration.

“Why don’t we also think about having something that we can at least have in agreement for all of us when we are working together?” he said.

The former leader emphasised that the regional bloc was not the work of one individual but a collective effort involving government institutions and civil servants.

“This would not have been possible without the support of all the staff of the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Economic Development,” he stated.

Gowon added that the recognition given to him and other awardees should be shared widely.

“The honour that is being done to me today should really go back to all the staff that worked so hard to make sure that this became a reality,” he said.

See also  UK to bar eligible visitors without ETA from February 25

He described the establishment of ECOWAS in 1975 as a defining moment for the region, bringing together leaders across West Africa to pursue shared economic and political goals, and commended ARCAN for sustaining diplomatic discourse and supporting governance.

The President of ARCAN, Joe Keshi, underscored the importance of recognising excellence in diplomacy, noting that the awards celebrate outstanding achievements and lifelong service to Nigeria and Africa.

“Diplomacy is one profession where success is often invisible, reflected not by news coverage, but by maintained stability, prevented conflicts, cultivated partnerships,” he said.

Keshi added that this year’s ceremony marks the 50th anniversary of ECOWAS, paying tribute to its founding visionaries, including Gowon and Gnassingbé Eyadéma, describing the bloc as “a bold experiment in regionalism.”

He urged diplomats to respond to evolving global challenges such as security, climate change and economic transformation, while commending award recipients and their families for their service.

The Chief of Army Staff, Lt Gen Waheed Shaibu, also paid tribute to Gowon, describing him as a symbol of visionary leadership and national unity.

He said the honour offers an opportunity to reflect on a legacy “defined by visionary leadership, courage, and unwavering commitment to the unity, stability, peace, and progress” of Nigeria, adding that Gowon’s leadership exemplified “patriotism, resilience, and a profound sense of duty.”

Shaibu further commended ARCAN for its role in shaping discourse on international affairs, noting that it remains “a vital intellectual and diplomatic platform” contributing to Nigeria’s engagement with the global community.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigerians, not INEC, will determine ADC’s fate — Party’s founding chairman, Ralph Nwosu

Published

on

In this interview with WALE AKINSELURE, the founder and pioneer National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Ralph Nwosu, explains the origin of the David Mark-led coalition, addresses factional and legal disputes, and the party’s strategy ahead of the 2027 general election

A lot is going on with the African Democratic Congress, among which is litigation, factionalisation spearheaded by the likes of Nafiu Gombe and Dumebi Kachikwu, which gives us the genesis of the David Mark-led ADC coalition that is being disputed.

This coalition happened immediately after the court judgment on the last election. I was moving around seeking a coalition. I had meetings with former President Olusegun Obasanjo many times. He invited some leaders. I had a meeting with Rauf Aregbesola in his home in Lagos and Osun. After that, Emeka Nwajuiba approached me and said that he was talking for a larger group, that all the groups that had been wanting to get in, including the PDP group, the Congress for Progressive Change group, the All Progressives Congress group, and I said that it was good. So, I started working with that group. I insisted that we will form this coalition once all of the critical opposition figures have signed in. This is because ADC, working with one single party alone, cannot do it. After I had the first conversations, we set up a committee that included Dr Mani Ahmad from Niger State, Dr Bamidele Ajadi from Oyo State, and Godson Okoye from Anambra State. They were the ones that we put forward to handle the negotiations. When it becomes a bit difficult, I will get involved. Later, we added more people. We added Jumoke Olawoyin, Bala Nafiu, and a couple of others. We continued that conversation. This recent coalition started more than two years ago. And when we started to agree, there was a need for us to have a National Executive Council meeting so that all our members and leaders would be informed. Our NEC is all the state chairmen plus the Federal Capital Territory, that is 37 chairmen. Then it also includes all our zonal executives. Each zone has between nine and 13 members, multiplied by six, that is over 70 members. Then the National Working Committee had about 30 members. So, we have a total of over 130 members. We held our first NEC meeting at NICON Luxury. The committee reported to them that some people are approaching us to form a coalition, merger or alliance and asked all the NEC members if they approve for us to continue that journey. They all approved. It was 100 per cent approval. The records are there. The media was there. The Independent National Electoral Commission was there at our NEC. So, when we agreed that we are ready to work with other political parties, other individuals to form a mega coalition, we sent them our Constitution. They saw our constitution, and they saw some limitations, that is, things in our constitution that would limit them from fully participating. And they raised it. For instance, you have to be a member for two years before you can contest an election, or even want to be an executive of the party, unless you get a waiver. When they pointed that out to us, we met and told them that, under our Constitution, the NEC can do the work you can do during the convention. The NEC can act for the convention. Therefore, we need to call another NEC meeting and make the needed amendments to make the coalition work well and be constitutional. So, NEC was called. Over 130 people were there, and the documentation was done. INEC was also present. Members of these different groups will also send a few people as observers to make sure everything is going well. They all went well. There was one clause that, if the national chairman resigns or is voted out, the person to act should be the deputy national chairman in charge of politics and must come from the same zone as the national chairman. We had to make all these amendments to make it possible for anybody from anywhere to contest the election. We did it in the presence of INEC. INEC helped us. Prelude to all of this, we were having some issues before, caused by Dumebi Kachikwu.

Are you referring to the same Dumebi Kachikwu who was your presidential candidate?

Yes, the small party we were then, anybody can come and say they want to run for President. We were looking for people to come and run. A lot of people will go to the PDP and APC to run, and parties were struggling to get a candidate who could run. As a matter of fact, it was when Dumebi came to undermine and deal with our party that we put those clauses that nobody can come after two or three months, and we give the person the ticket to run because you don’t know their motives. So, when we redid our constitution, we included all that, because of the troublesomeness of Dumebi. Dumebi came to our party to cause problems.

If he was causing problems, what firm measures did you implement to deal with the situation?

During our convention, he was expelled. And our party was free to adopt the Labour Party presidential candidate during the election proper. He was expelled. Those who know Dumebi Kachikwu will know he is just looking to play a destructive game.

But he still claims to be a member…

See also  Kano Gov Meets Tinubu In France After Secret Meeting With Kwankwaso

Presently, he’s not our member. But, for some reason, the fact that he was a presidential candidate makes him feel that it doesn’t expire. You always see him on television claiming to be the presidential candidate of ADC. But you took our ticket and tried to damage the party. If you were a presidential candidate, it has expired now; you didn’t use it well. Now, the gains of ADC have created business for the people instead of thinking of nation-building. So, people like Kachikwu, and unfortunately, Bala Nafiu, have become victims. All that is happening is just the party in power and the media that is giving it this colouration.

Was Bala part of the various meetings you mentioned?

One hundred per cent, yes. There was no meeting he missed. The records are there. INEC records are there. When Bala went to court claiming something, one of the documents that was presented in the court was the one that INEC wrote. INEC presented a case against Bala that it was there and that Bala participated in everything. INEC had their record. But recently, we heard that INEC had gone back on what they presented when Bala started this troublesome thing.

So, what is happening now?

What is happening is that people are being induced to appear as if there is a crisis in ADC. How can one individual be a faction in a group that is now five million persons? We have had people who have run as presidential candidates even in the major parties before, and the moment that election year finishes, and you didn’t win, that is over. But as far as Dumebi is concerned, he is using anything that would make it look as if he influences ADC, as the government in place has so much money to throw away. This is money they have come to regard as an anti-opposition budget. A few people are looking that way. But that few, even if they are 20 or 30 or whatever number, is not a fraction in an organisation that is over five million registered members who are paying their dues.

There are those of the opinion that while you were reaching terms of agreement with Senator David Mark and his group, you sidelined Bala, Dumebi and others in some sharing formula…

Sharing what? I have never been a transactional leader. As far as ADC is concerned, as far as this coalition is concerned, nobody did any transaction. We are part of the party, and if by God’s grace, we win the election, we’ll be part of the government. From what we were before, that’s a big plus. We gave Pat Utomi the party to run for president. Ask him if there was any transaction. Instead, most leaders of the party were contributing to his election. When the former president Obasanjo came, ask him if Chief Nwosu or any executive of the party had come to him to collect a dime. None. We’re not into transactions. We are deeply vested in nation-building. But some people can be easily swayed, and they think that everything in politics is about transaction; it’s about money, and so on. And if we don’t change that, it will continue to hurt this country. That is why I said that the ADC is hope built on integrity, and nobody can take that away.

You have a lot of legal battles that you face, and you hope to participate in the 2027 elections. How do you hope to circumvent these battles?

Those legal battles started because of the coalition that we built. And how many? Even though all this legal battle is getting public attention, it is not up to one per cent of the legal battles within the APC itself. It’s not up to one per cent of the legal battle within PDP. It’s not up to one per cent of the legal battle within the All Progressives Grand Alliance. It’s not up to 50 per cent of the legal battle within all the other political parties that are in existence today. It’s just being hyped by people who want to create the impression that there’s too much trouble in ADC. Don’t go there. That’s the game. But the leadership of the party in place has also helped us navigate very well. It would be good as media professionals that you tell political parties and leaders, that it’s election time, go and focus on campaigning and convincing Nigerian people and not investing money to destroy the party, corrupting all the systems that we have. INEC was challenging Bala on their own because they have the records. Then, since Prof Joash Amupitan came, that challenge was withdrawn. INEC actually organised the Alternative Dispute Resolution. This is the ADR that brought together all the old chairmen more than two years back. And all those we brought back, we gave their position. And all these records were put together. INEC has them. And INEC got one of the best ADR firms to handle it at their own cost. And we were benevolent to bring everybody back. Now that it’s time for congresses, some of those chairmen who were giving problems that we brought back and whose tenure is over are now trying to blackmail the party so that all of them are returned. We said, go and face the election. They don’t want to do that. Instead, they’ve gone back to people who have the budget to stop all the coalition processes. When Nigerians are suffering, when we have a security situation, the APC has some billions of Naira to fund people who want to disrupt other political parties.

See also  Convention showdown: PDP govs resist Wike bloc’s move to dismantle committees

Does that include Leke Abejide, who is also in protest against the David Mark leadership?

Part of the thing pushing Leke Abejide is that, since he got elected in ADC, he became an APC supporter because APC got him and gave him the chairman of the House Committee on Customs. He’s in a minority party, and they gave him the position of chairman of customs, so he’s in alignment with the APC. In 2023, Leke Abejide made it clear that ADC is for President Bola Tinubu and their government because he’s the chairman of customs in the House of Representatives.

You went ahead with your Convention despite derecognition by the INEC. Some ex-staff of INEC and analysts fear that there might be consequences, including that INEC may not recognise that Convention.

It would be wrong if we did everything we needed to do, if all our processes are good, and then the umpire is out to de-market us. The umpire put out the time for the congresses to happen. The umpire set out the time for parties to choose candidates for the upcoming election. And when it is about one month to do your congresses and present your candidates, the umpire came out to interpret a ruling any way they like and continue to de-market ADC? We are a peace-loving party, and we are genuine in what we are doing. It’s a democracy, and we are doing everything we are doing transparently before the Nigerian public. All the agencies in this country, as far as democracy is concerned, whether you are the president, whether you are anything, report to the Nigerian people. We want the Nigerian people to take ownership. Nigerian people must take ownership of INEC. If the Chairman of INEC has become a tool, we’re now reporting to the Nigerian people. We can’t allow his whims and caprices to derail us. We won’t allow that. The media, international organisations, international agencies, and embassies witnessed our convention.

What if INEC declares that all your electoral processes from top to bottom are not recognised?

INEC is supposed to oversee the electoral process, but the moment they start to fail, you hand it over to the Nigerian people, who own the country and own all the agencies and so on. We must stop Amupitan. If you love democracy, you’ll be very upset with Bola Tinubu. You mean we fought for democracy for him to become president and foist an undemocratic system like never before on the country? Is that why the military was chased away? For him to have the opportunity to become President, he has fallen short of expectations for his constituency and everybody. People like Obafemi Awolowo and MKO Abiola will be turning in their graves. Is this a democracy?

The ADC, PDP, and LP’s challenges are quite pronounced. Do you also share the fear that the 2027 presidential election might be a walkover for Tinubu?

That is what Bola Tinubu is planning, but it would not work.

Why won’t it work?

The Nigerian people will take over.

The same Nigerian people who are sometimes regarded as docile?

We have become accountable to the Nigerian people. My phone is always on silent mode because I receive over a thousand calls in a day. The ADC website, despite being upgraded to the Amazon portal, is still challenged because of the interest of the Nigerian people. Nigerians are alert. We will not allow a few, desperate, disingenuous individuals to run down the democracy in our country. Enough is enough.

When shall the ADC get to the point of zoning the presidency? Recently, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, during an interview on Arise Television, made a case for the North producing the president in 2027.

In ADC, it is open. When this coalition was happening, I had some young Northern people come to my office who argued against the South continuing. They said, ADC, you have to be fair. They argued that this republic started in 1999, and from then till the end of the current Bola Tinubu’s tenure, that the South would have done 18 years and the North 10 years. And that we are still saying that it is the turn of the South? I never thought in that light, but that is the reality. If the North is saying, leave it open. If the South gets it, they will be ready to work with them.

When you mean leaving it open, are you talking about direct primaries?

We are plotting two options. We are looking at a consensus if everybody agrees. But where there is disagreement, we do direct primaries. Whoever wins becomes the standard-bearer of the party. I have heard some of the candidates say that if they don’t win, they are in the party and would support whoever wins. Rotimi Amaechi, Atiku Abubakar, and Peter Obi have said that. We await Rabiu Kwankwaso to also say that publicly. But the day the document was signed, that was what we put forward. We were very clear on open ticket and transparency. That was part of the reason everybody agreed that one of the persons who can do transparent primaries, because of his transparent character, is the chairmanship of David Mark.

There is the view that your party could fall in place or fall apart with the choice of its presidential candidate. How crucial is it that you get this right?

See also  Abia community donates ₦100m for Otti’s re-election bid

By October, you will realise that with the party that we are building, anyone who gets the ticket will win the election. The frontrunners now are Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, Rotimi Amaechi, Emeka Nwajuiba, Rauf Aregbesola, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Aminu Tambuwal, and Babachir Lawal. Any of these is what we are looking at. One of them will become a candidate, but it is also possible that none of them will be because the party we are building will deliver anybody we put forward. So far, it’s going well with the party. The Nigerian people are in love with what we are doing. The only people trying to pour sand in our garri are the APC, which is unfortunate. It’s democracy. Go and campaign, and if God has helped you and you get into office, your campaign would have been the outcome of your good governance. The judiciary should tell politicians that it is not for the courts to give them victory; they should go and meet the Nigerian people.

In terms of zones, where do you think the strength of ADC lies?

From the membership registration of over five million that we have presently, the North-West has registered the most, followed by the North-East, then South-South and South-West, then North-Central. For some reason, the South-East has not done so well, but they are coming up.

But a five-million-member membership would not win the presidential election.

These are active men and women who are involved in the party. It is not up to five per cent of eligible Nigerians who want to be involved in parties as members. I am an ADC member; my children and wife are busy with their own professions. As a matter of fact, they don’t want anything to do with politics. And that is the same way in most homes. Most bankers are not members of any political party; most professionals are busy. But they are conscious, and they would vote. We are targeting 37.5million votes to win the election. ADC will win the election.

But you also have factions at the state level.

At the state level, ADC is one of the strongest organisations that we have. When David Mark took office, we only had about seven party offices at the state level that were working. But now we have 36 strong party offices as strong as any party in Nigeria. We have 774 local government offices, and we have 8,900 ward offices spread across Nigeria. We have set up different committees. Our intelligence committee is working very hard. Our contact and mobilisation committee is working. Our integrity committee is working. Recently, two major organisations came out of ADC. There is the one ADC movement chaired by Lauretta Onochie, and the idea is to make sure that all groups coalesce into one ADC. Then the other major group is the Coalition for Electoral Integrity, and within the next few months, it will ensure that Nigerians are properly educated about what their vote means. They would preach that even if somebody offers them N100,000 – which we heard is the budget they are setting for buying votes – it is not worth it. The coalition is taking off, and Nigerians will be educated more on how they should vote than they have ever been educated in our democracy before.

Funding continues to be crucial for parties to prosecute elections. You alluded that it was once the bane of the ADC. How do you intend to change that narrative with the 2027 election?

When we formed the party, I was clear with my colleagues that we were going to take this party, with our vision and DNA, into the Villa. Due to funding, it has taken us this long. But now, with the calibre of persons, stature of individuals who have joined the party, and with what Nigerians have seen, we won’t have any issue regarding funding. You see a lot of Nigerians working on their own, promoting ADC. We have had old, retired men and women asking us to send our account for them to send money, saying they love what we are doing. They are both military and civilians. We have had retired men of the Armed Forces who have seen their men killed, contractors who the government is not paying, who send their stipends seeking our help to rescue them. We will have more than enough money to prosecute the election. And a lot of people are not asking us for money.

What are we looking at in terms of the amount for your party forms for the various elective positions?

It will be out within the next fortnight.

You gave up your national chairmanship of the party. In what role do you now play in the party?

I am a floor member, and I like that. At times, it is good to lead from the floor. Nigerians need to be inspired to see that this bloated head about the leader, the president, is nothing. I am a floor member as well as a major stakeholder in the party. I have declined all the committees they put me on. I am only the chairman of the Integrity Committee.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending