Connect with us

News

I never asked soldiers to remove meat from meals, activist replies defence minister

Published

on

Social media activist Mark Justice, popularly known as Justice Crack, has denied allegations by the Minister of Defence, Christopher Musa, that he instructed Nigerian soldiers to remove meat from their meals to make their food appear inadequate in a viral video.

Justice Crack’s response followed comments made by the minister during an interview on News Central, where he dismissed claims of poor feeding in the military and accused the activist of staging the video.

“The soldiers’ food was okay. There was meat, there was all these things. He told them to put all these things out and make it look as if those things were not there,” the minister said.

Defence Minister, Christopher Musa

Reacting in a statement on Thursday, Justice Crack described the allegation as false and defamatory, insisting he had no authority to direct serving military personnel.

“The Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa (Rtd), lied during an interview on News Central that I, JusticeCrack, instructed military officers to remove meat and other items from their meals to make the food appear inadequate,” he said.

“I never told any military officer to remove meat or anything else from their food. What authority do I have to give such an instruction? I am not a General, a Commander, or a Colonel. I have no military background whatsoever. Why would I instruct serving military personnel to do such a thing?”

The activist maintained that he never approached military personnel, adding that some officers had instead contacted him to complain about their welfare.

“It is also important for the public to know that I never reached out to military officers. Rather, some of them reached out to me to express concerns about their welfare.

See also  ‘I Am Not Sure I Am Going To Make Heaven’ – Donald Trump

“In good faith, I made a video to raise awareness so that the military authorities could pay attention to the welfare of the officers and men serving our country. My intention was simply to advocate for better working conditions, improved welfare, and better living conditions for the brave men and women who defend Nigeria,” he stated.

Justice Crack said the minister’s comments had the potential to damage his reputation.

“It is deeply painful and, in my view, defamatory to hear the Honourable Minister of Defence make such a statement about me on national television without presenting any evidence.

“Such a statement has the potential to damage my reputation and misrepresent my intentions before the Nigerian public.”

He reiterated that his advocacy had always focused on accountability and improved welfare for security personnel.

“I therefore wish to make it abundantly clear that I, Mark Chidiebere Justice, popularly known as JusticeCrack, never instructed any military officer to remove meat or any other item from their food.

“My advocacy has always been about accountability, better welfare for our security personnel, and good governance. This statement is made solely to correct the record and inform the Nigerian public of the true position.”

PUNCH Online had reported in May that Justice Crack was remanded in prison custody after being arraigned over a viral video allegedly criticising the Nigerian Army’s feeding arrangements.

The activist was charged with alleged cyber-related offences.

One of the charges accused him of circulating false information through his social media handle, @JusticeCrack, regarding the alleged inadequate feeding of Nigerian Army personnel.

See also  Why we halted tinted glass permit enforcement – IGP Egbetokun

The charge reads in part, “That you, CHIDIEBERE JUSTICE MARK… did circulate information to the public through your social media handle @JusticeCrack regarding alleged inadequate feeding of Nigerian Army personnel, which you know the said information to be false but posted it for the purpose of causing annoyance, ill will, and hatred… contrary to and punishable under Section 24(1)(b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015, as amended.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Anthropic flags five Claude AI uses linked to biological weapons research

Published

on

Anthropic, the company behind Claude AI, says it identified five cases in which users employed its artificial intelligence models in ways that could support biological weapons development.

The company disclosed this in its latest threat intelligence report published on Thursday, saying the cases were among a range of malicious or potentially harmful activities detected and disrupted on its platform between December 2025 and August 2026.

Anthropic particularly flagged five Claude AI use cases that involved research into areas including chikungunya virus, highly pathogenic avian influenza, orthopoxviruses, venom peptides and toxins.

The company said it had banned the accounts involved and incorporated information from its investigations into its safeguards, enforcement and threat intelligence systems.

However, Anthropic stressed that it was not asserting that the scientists involved intended to cause harm.

“We do not assert that they intended harm, and identifying them or their labs could expose them to harm,” the company said, adding that it would withhold the names of the research institutions, countries and specific biological agents or techniques involved.

Anthropic said the cases demonstrated the difficulty of distinguishing between legitimate scientific research and activities that could be used for harmful purposes.

“Biological misuse is one of the most serious risks of frontier AI models,” the company said, warning that AI could potentially be used to make existing pathogens more dangerous or create new ones.

“The same information that can be used to develop a biological weapon could also be used to develop, for example, a vaccine or a cure for a disease,” the AI giant added.

See also  ‘I Am Not Sure I Am Going To Make Heaven’ – Donald Trump

In the first case, Anthropic said its biological safety classifier blocked a request to help prepare a grant application involving gain-of-function research on chikungunya virus.

The company said its subsequent investigation found that a reseller platform was being used to provide access to Claude to researchers in regions where Anthropic does not offer its services.

The platform also allegedly routed requests rejected by Claude to other AI models with more permissive safeguards.

Anthropic said it banned the associated accounts, worked with partners to take down the relay networks and shared its findings with AI companies and government authorities.

In a second case, the company said a researcher outside the US used Claude over several weeks while planning research involving highly pathogenic avian influenza and its adaptation to mammals.

According to Anthropic, the researcher used Claude for study planning, data analysis, interpretation and prioritisation of experiments, as well as editorial assistance.

The company said its safeguards restricted the researcher to weaker Claude models and that the AI’s contribution was primarily limited to clerical assistance, study ideation and design.

Anthropic said the case nevertheless provided evidence of active research programmes involving pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential.

A third case involved a grant application for orthopoxvirus research at a state-associated infectious disease laboratory. Anthropic said a reseller relay serving more than a dozen customers used Claude to draft the application.

The company said the application involved research into how orthopoxviruses interact with the immune system and was produced using Claude Opus 5 in about an hour.

The fourth and fifth cases involved research into venoms and toxins.

See also  Igbo Town Unions drag Lagos demolitions to UN, ECOWAS Court, alleges ethnic bias

Anthropic said one researcher used Claude to develop an atlas of venom toxin peptides and a generative system for optimising toxin characteristics, with the stated goal of developing therapeutic molecules.

In another case, a researcher used Claude in projects involving the computational redesign of toxins under a national public research programme. Anthropic said the researcher deliberately obscured the identities of some toxins and viral proteins in progress reports.

The company said both accounts were banned in May 2026 for violating its Supported Regions Policy.

Anthropic said the cases highlighted the challenge of regulating AI-assisted biological research because many applications are “dual use”, meaning they can have both beneficial and harmful applications.

Anthropic, however, cautioned against interpreting its findings as evidence that Claude was currently enabling imminent biological threats.

“We take these cases as evidence not of the imminence of biological threats currently uplifted by Claude, but rather as evidence that significant dual-use research efforts are associated with state actors of concern,” the company said.

The report is part of a wider disclosure by Anthropic on the misuse of its AI systems.

The company said its investigations over the past eight months also uncovered cyber operations, surveillance, influence operations, scams and fraud, conventional weapons development and attempts to illicitly distil its models.

The report comes shortly after concerns raised publicly by former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon about the risks posed by increasingly capable AI systems.

PUNCH Online previously reported that Coxon resigned from Anthropic and said “people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

See also  US-based Nigerian doctor escapes death in Oyo mob attack

Anthropic’s latest report also said it had identified a Russia-linked cyber espionage operation in which Claude was used to automate parts of attacks against organisations in Ukraine and Europe.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

South Korea, Iran discuss Strait of Hormuz security

Published

on

The foreign ministers of South Korea and Iran discussed the Strait of Hormuz in a phone call on Friday, Seoul said, days after confirming it was weighing a “contribution” to the waterway’s security.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly pressured ally South Korea to provide help for the war in the Middle East, saying Seoul rejected his request for assistance in securing the waterway that is crucial to global oil supplies.

South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun spoke by phone with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi at Tehran’s request, “discussing the recent situation in the Middle East”, and the Strait of Hormuz, the foreign ministry in Seoul said in a statement.

The Friday announcement followed a warning from Tehran earlier this week that any South Korean military contribution to the conflict would have “serious consequences”.

South Korea sent a fact-finding team to assess the situation in the strait and has repeatedly said it has not decided whether to deploy its military to Hormuz.

Traffic through the vital shipping route has been virtually paralysed since the US-Iran war began on February 28, disrupting global energy markets.

Negotiations between Iran and the United States have stalled as they vied for control over Hormuz, which normally carries around a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas exports.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  US-based Nigerian doctor escapes death in Oyo mob attack
Continue Reading

News

US arms NAF for terror war

Published

on

The United States has delivered military equipment to the Nigerian Air Force as part of efforts to strengthen the security partnership between both countries and support Nigeria’s counter-terrorism operations.

The United States Africa Command disclosed this in a post on its X handle on Thursday, along with pictures of a U.S. Air Force C-17 aircraft delivering the equipment.

AFRICOM said the equipment was supplied under a foreign military sales agreement between the two countries.

“PARTNERSHIP IN ACTION: A U.S. Air Force C-17 delivers equipment to the Nigerian Air Force this weekend. The equipment is part of a foreign military sales agreement that furthers the U.S.-Nigerian partnership and will aid in Nigeria’s efforts to counter terrorism in the region,” the command said.

The latest delivery comes against the backdrop of continued military cooperation between Nigeria and the United States, including training and capacity-building programmes.

On August 23, US forces began training Nigerian troops in unmanned aircraft systems, combat casualty care and other military skills at Operating Location Bauchi, as part of efforts to strengthen security cooperation between the two countries.

According to AFRICOM, the training covered combat lifesaver and tactical combat casualty care instruction, weapons familiarisation, camouflage, water treatment and testing, explosive ordnance disposal, small-unit tactics and unmanned aircraft systems.

The command said the training was developed based on the expertise available among US forces and areas identified by their Nigerian counterparts as beneficial.

It added that unmanned aircraft systems generated particular interest among Nigerian forces, with about 10 members of the Nigerian Air Force Special Forces Regiment receiving practical training on operating the systems.

See also  ‘I Am Not Sure I Am Going To Make Heaven’ – Donald Trump

The US personnel also trained the Nigerian troops on techniques for employing unmanned aircraft systems and incorporating information gathered by the systems into military operations.

The development followed AFRICOM’s disclosure in July that the United States had withdrawn most of its troops deployed to Nigeria for a specific counter-terrorism operation, while retaining an intelligence-sharing and security partnership with the country.

Despite the withdrawal, both countries have continued to engage in military cooperation through intelligence sharing, training and other capacity-building initiatives.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending