Connect with us

News

Fake agency probe: ICPC team grills embattled PFIPC DG inside police detention

Published

on

The investigation into the controversial Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) intensified on Wednesday as the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission commenced interrogation of the alleged founder of the disputed agency, Adeniyi Adeyemi, inside police detention.

The PFIPC controversy erupted after allegations that Adeyemi presented himself as the Director-General of a presidential body that several government institutions said they neither created nor recognised, while questions were raised over alleged forged documents, bank accounts and the council’s inclusion in budget proposals.

Adeyemi’s questioning, however, came after an earlier attempt by the anti-graft agency to interview him was stalled when his new lawyer failed to appear at the Nigeria Police Force National Cybercrime Centre, where the suspect was being held.

ICPC operatives, who arrived at the facility around 10am, had prepared for the session but suspended the exercise to allow Adeyemi secure legal representation in line with his rights under criminal procedure.

The interrogation later commenced after his new lawyer arrived, but the session was not concluded as investigators continued probing allegations surrounding the creation, operations and claims of official recognition by the purported PFIPC.

The development came as the controversy widened, with the House of Representatives set to question top government officials, including the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume; National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu; Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu; and Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, over the council’s appearance in the 2026 budget and its alleged access to government facilities on Thursday (today).

Adeyemi grilled

A senior police source familiar with the investigation, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to comment on the matter, said the anti-graft agency rescheduled Adeyemi’s grilling session from 10am to 3pm on Wednesday to ensure compliance with the suspect’s right to legal representation.

“The ICPC earlier today (Wednesday) was at the Cybercrime Centre in an attempt to interview Adeyemi around 10am, but the interview could not hold after the set-up had been done because his lawyer was absent. That was why the interview was later fixed for 3pm,” the source said.

Another police source confirmed that the interrogation eventually commenced after Adeyemi’s lawyer arrived but noted that the session could not be concluded.

“His lawyer eventually came and he was later interrogated in the presence of his lawyer. They couldn’t conclude the questioning today and there’s the possibility of them continuing some other day, probably tomorrow (today),” the source said.

Under Nigeria’s criminal justice procedure, suspects undergoing formal interrogation by law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies are entitled to legal representation, and investigators typically defer questioning until counsels are present to safeguard the integrity of the process.

On Monday, the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was at the headquarters of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission in Abuja.

Adeyemi, who was arrested last week, claimed that Gbajabiamila gave him an appointment letter for the role, adding that he gave money to the Chief of Staff to secure the job.

See also  Solomon Islands’ PM survives attempt to oust government

But the former House of Representatives Speaker has denied the allegations, filing a suit against Adeyemi. The Presidency has also said the council does not exist.

​Gbajabiamila’s legal counsel, Jiti Ogunye of Jiti Ogunye Chambers, confirmed the Chief of Staff’s appearance in an official statement.

Ogunye said, “​In full cooperation with the ICPC acting as directed by the President of Nigeria, I hereby confirm that my client, Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief of Staff to the President of Nigeria, responded to the invitation of the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission and appeared at about 15:00hrs on Monday, July 20, 2026, as part of the ongoing investigation into the activities of the ‘PFIPC’ fake agency, among others.

“My client gave his testimony, responded to questions accordingly, and has returned to his duty post.”

Gbajabiamila’s appearance at the anti-graft agency comes weeks after President Bola Tinubu directed the ICPC to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the activities of the fictitious Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, which the Presidency said was never established by the Federal Government.

In a statement issued on July 7 by the President’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, Tinubu ordered the anti-corruption agency to investigate the activities of the fake council and submit a report within 30 days.

The Presidency said the investigation should cover the alleged use of forged appointment letters and official government documents by one Adeniyi Adeyemi, who allegedly presented himself as the Director-General of the non-existent council while falsely claiming to be a presidential appointee.

The probe also includes allegations that Adeyemi used the false claim to seek official recognition and diplomatic support, including visa facilitation, and allegedly opened multiple bank accounts in the names of purported government agencies using forged documents.

Reps committee

The House of Representatives Ad-hoc Committee investigating the controversial establishment and operations of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is set to question several top government officials today over their alleged roles in the activities of the council and its inclusion in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Among those expected to appear before the panel are the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume; the National Security Adviser, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu; the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu; the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); the Minister of Finance, Taiwo Oyedele; and the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi.

Others expected before the committee, chaired by Plateau lawmaker Yusuf Gagdi, include the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu; Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; Executive Secretary/Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission, Aisha Rimi; officials of the National Economic Council Secretariat; as well as representatives of the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission and the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission.

The officials are expected to clarify their respective roles in the inclusion of the PFIPC in the 2026 budget estimates presented by President Bola Tinubu to the National Assembly, as well as issues surrounding the allocation of office accommodation to the council.

The latest hearing follows revelations by the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Dunoma Ahmed, who distanced the ministry from the activities of the council and questioned its legitimacy.

See also  Missing names, party disputes cloud INEC list ahead of 2027 elections

Ahmed told lawmakers that an individual identified as Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi approached the ministry on three occasions — June 26, 2025; August 5, 2025; and June 5, 2026 — introducing himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

He said Adeyemi sought the ministry’s endorsement and collaboration to organise a World Investment Summit in Nigeria.

According to the Permanent Secretary, the ministry rejected the requests after conducting due diligence, citing inconsistencies in the correspondence and concerns over the authenticity of the council and its purported leadership.

Ahmed further disclosed that the ministry wrote to the Office of the National Security Adviser on October 16, 2025, seeking clarification on the status of the organisation and the identity of its alleged Director-General.

He said the NSA’s office replied on November 26, 2025, informing the ministry that inquiries made with both the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President showed that Prince Adeyemi was unknown to any Federal Government office.

The Permanent Secretary also told the committee that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had no involvement in any diplomatic engagement involving the PFIPC and did not facilitate meetings between the council and foreign governments, diplomatic missions, international organisations or prospective investors.

He added that no memorandum of understanding, treaty or investment agreement was negotiated or executed through the council, while no Nigerian diplomatic mission abroad was instructed to recognise or engage with it.

The committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce two suspects reportedly arrested in connection with documents allegedly obtained from the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, which purportedly approved the council’s participation in the federal budget process and granted a waiver for the deployment of about 300 personnel.

Akume is also expected to explain the circumstances surrounding the allocation of office space within Phase III of the Federal Secretariat complex, which was originally assigned to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation in 2023 but was allegedly transferred to the PFIPC.

At Tuesday’s proceedings, Gagdi expressed dissatisfaction with the failure of several invited officials to honour the committee’s invitation, warning that the panel would invoke its constitutional powers to compel their appearance if they failed to attend the next sitting.

The investigation follows concerns over the alleged operation of the PFIPC as a government agency despite claims by several federal institutions that they neither established nor recognised it.

Lawmakers are seeking to determine how the council allegedly secured office accommodation, sought official recognition from government agencies and appeared in the 2026 budget proposals despite questions surrounding its legal status.

The outcome of the probe is expected to guide further legislative action as the House seeks to establish whether there were breaches of due process or abuse of public institutions in the operations of the council.

See also  See why Bayelsa governor delayed defection to APC

Atiku tackles Tinubu

Meanwhile, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar intensified the political dimension of the controversy, accusing the Tinubu administration of failing to provide clarity over conflicting explanations surrounding the operations of the alleged agency and demanding accountability from the government.

Atiku said the differing positions of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Central Bank of Nigeria over the opening of bank accounts linked to the PFIPC had raised serious questions about the handling of the matter.

In a statement issued by his Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice-president said President Bola Tinubu should either order an independent investigation into the controversy or take responsibility for resolving the issues.

He said, “This is where the cover-up appears to begin. One institution denied authorising the opening of the PFIPC accounts and alleged forgery. Another, before the representatives of the Nigerian people, stated that the accounts were opened on the directive of the Accountant-General after due process was followed. Both accounts cannot be true.”

Atiku argued that the conflicting accounts from the two government institutions had created a credibility crisis for the administration.

“When two of your most sensitive financial and monetary authorities publicly contradict each other on the same transaction, no serious leader needs a clairvoyant to know that his administration is trapped in a web of deception and a profound crisis of credibility.

“The President cannot continue to watch from the sidelines while his government tears itself apart with conflicting narratives,” he said.

The former Vice President challenged Tinubu to clarify which of the two official positions his administration recognised.

“President Tinubu must answer a simple question: which version does he believe — the Accountant-General’s or the Central Bank’s? If he believes neither, why has he not acted?” he asked.

He also criticised what he described as the silence of the Attorney-General of the Federation, saying it had further heightened public concerns over the controversy.

Atiku urged the National Assembly to invite the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria to appear jointly before its investigative committee to explain the conflicting claims.

“The PFIPC scandal has ceased to be merely about disputed accounts. It has become a referendum on President Tinubu’s integrity and competence,” he said.

He maintained that the President could restore public confidence only by ensuring an independent investigation into the matter.

“President Tinubu owes Nigerians an unreserved apology for presiding over this unprecedented collapse of public accountability. If he cannot immediately restore public confidence through a genuinely independent investigation and ensure that everyone responsible is held to account, then he has forfeited the moral authority to continue in office. The honourable course is simple: apologise to Nigerians and resign,” he said.

The PFIPC controversy followed conflicting explanations by the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Central Bank of Nigeria over the opening of accounts linked to the council.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

N10bn intervention not for Ebola alone, says NCDC boss

Published

on

The Director-General of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr Jide Idris, has said that the controversial N10bn emergency intervention fund approved by President Bola Tinubu was not meant for Ebola Virus Disease alone but for strengthening Nigeria’s preparedness against multiple epidemic-prone diseases.

Idris, who clarified amid growing public debate over the allocation, said the fund was designed to strengthen prevention, preparedness, early detection and rapid response to public health threats, including Lassa fever, cholera, cerebrospinal meningitis, diphtheria, measles, monkeypox and antimicrobial resistance.

He explained that the N10bn was released directly to the NCDC and not to the Presidential Task Force on Ebola Virus Disease, contrary to some narratives surrounding the intervention.

The NCDC boss who had during a press conference on Sunday, October 25, 2026, told journalists that the N10bn has not been released to the agency, did not specify when the fund was eventually released.

Idris, who stressed that the allocation was inadequate in view of Nigeria’s growing health security needs, disclosed that implementing the country’s National Action Plan for Health Security, covering 2025 to 2029, would cost approximately N522bn over five years.

“This translates to an average annual requirement of N104.4bn, meaning the N10bn intervention represents only about two per cent of the plan’s average yearly cost.”

According to him, Nigeria, with a population exceeding 240 million, requires sustained investments from the Federal Government, state governments and development partners to adequately protect its population against epidemic threats.

Providing a breakdown of government funding for health security, Idris disclosed that NCDC’s allocation increased from N4bn in 2024 to N7bn in 2025, followed by a N5bn intervention fund that year, while the 2026 Appropriation provides N22bn.

See also  El-Rufai sues ICPC ₦1bn over unlawful Abuja home invasion

He added that President Tinubu approved the additional N10bn emergency intervention funding in June 2026 following the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which raised global concerns about Ebola.

Idris maintained that the request was never restricted to Ebola but covered the broader national health security agenda.

“In June 2026, as the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo became a global emergency, Mr President graciously approved a further N10 billion in emergency intervention funding. That fund was requested for all our epidemic-prone diseases, not Ebola alone, and now strengthens work already underway, as we had mobilised resources from government and partners and kept building.

“The gap, however, remains real. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board estimates that a country needs US$1 to US$2 per person each year to be acceptably prepared for epidemics.

“For about 240 million Nigerians, that is US$240 million to US$480 million a year. Sustained investment from government, States and partners will close that gap.

“This background illustrates the extent to which health security remains underfunded, partly because public investment tends to favour more tangible and immediately visible interventions”, he added.

The NCDC boss said the debate surrounding the N10bn should shift from political controversy to the urgent need for sustainable investment in national health security.

He argued that preventing epidemics, averting deaths and avoiding economic disruption require deliberate financial commitments, warning that the cost of failing to prepare for disease outbreaks could far exceed the cost of prevention.

On the Ebola situation, Idris said Nigeria had confirmed its first imported case of Bundibugyo Ebola virus disease, adding that the laboratory confirmation was made on October 20, 2026, within 24 hours of receiving the alert in Abuja.

See also  Tinubu approves ₦3.3trn payment plan to restore reliable power

He, however, assured Nigerians that there was no active case in the country as of the time of his statement, with identified contacts under daily surveillance.

He said surveillance would continue until the last identified contact completes the mandatory 21-day monitoring period without developing symptoms or any new case emerging.

Idris also dismissed calls for the postponement of elections, restrictions on travel or a blanket ban on mass gatherings, insisting that the prevailing situation did not warrant such measures.

According to him, the NCDC had instead developed technical guidelines for organisers of mass gatherings, stressing that strict adherence to infection prevention and control measures would enable public events to proceed safely.

He urged Nigerians to avoid spreading unverified information, warning that misinformation and the politicisation of public health emergencies could undermine public confidence and jeopardise the country’s response efforts.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

National Assembly proposes 74 additional seats for women

Published

on

The National Assembly has proposed the creation of 74 additional seats for women in the Senate and House of Representatives, alongside three reserved seats for women in each state House of Assembly, as part of efforts to address the underrepresentation of women in Nigeria’s political system.

The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, disclosed this on Monday at the 2026 Law Week organised by the International Federation of Women Lawyers, Ekiti State chapter, with the theme, “Justice in a Changing World: Responding to New Challenges Affecting Women and Children.”

The senator representing Ekiti Central Senatorial District said that the proposed constitution amendment was targeted at breaking the barriers limiting women’s participation in governance and promoting inclusive political culture.

Bamidele, who is also the Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, said the proposals were part of the ongoing constitutional amendment process and would create special legislative seats for women without displacing existing elected representatives.

The initiative, if approved, would add 37 seats to the Senate and 37 to the House of Representatives, ensuring that each state of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory has one additional seat in each chamber.

The programme was attended by the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Information and National Orientation, Steve Fatoba, and the Speaker of the Ekiti State House of Assembly, Adeoye Aribasoye, among others.

Speaking at the event, Bamidele said, “A Bill for an Act to alter the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to provide for special seats for women in the National and state Houses of Assembly and for related matters is receiving our attention at the National Assembly.”

The Senate Leader said the proposal followed extensive consultations and consensus-building, adding that the National Assembly had commenced the constitutional review process early to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive exercise.

See also  Dangote now supplies 92% of petrol as FG pauses imports

He added that the legislative initiative “is the fruit of extensive consultation and consensus-building. It is why we commenced the constitutional amendment process early, ensuring that this is not a rushed, haphazard endeavour but a deliberate, inclusive, and thorough reform.

“The proposal, as it stands, is meticulous in its design. It seeks to add 37 seats in the Senate and 37 seats in the House of Representatives.

“This suggests that if finally approved, each state of the federation, including the FCT, will have one additional seat in each of the Houses of the National Assembly.”

Bamidele said the committee had also proposed three additional seats for women in each state House of Assembly, with the arrangement expected to last for 16 years, covering four electoral cycles, before a comprehensive review.

He said the proposal was intended to provide women with greater access to legislative representation while allowing time to assess its impact on political participation.

Bamidele further revealed that the constitution review committee proposed three additional seats for each state House of Assembly, all specifically reserved for women, without displacing any existing electoral seats.

“This arrangement is proposed to run for a period of 16 years, four electoral cycles, before a comprehensive review. This is a sunset clause designed to ensure sustainability and to allow for the organic development of a more inclusive political culture.

“We are actively and strategically engaging with the state Houses of Assembly, as their concurrence is a constitutional sine qua non for bringing this reform to fruition. However, let me add a crucial point that speaks to the very essence of our democratic journey and the Renewed Hope Agenda,” he said.

The Senate leader said the proposal was not a partisan initiative but a constitutional intervention aimed at addressing the exclusion of women from political decision-making.

Bamidele noted that the resolve of the 10th National Assembly had been strengthened by advocacy from senior government figures, including the First Lady, Oluremi Tinubu.

See also  UK backs reforms as Abbas, Bamidele list safeguards for State Police

He said the special seat initiative “is not a partisan endeavour. It is a historic imperative. The rationale is anchored on a simple, yet profound, principle of constitutional law: the foundational precept of representative democracy.

“A democracy that systematically excludes over half of its population from the decision-making tables that determine their futures is, at best, a flawed democracy and, at worst, a veiled oligarchy.”

He also highlighted the need for legislative interventions to protect vulnerable groups, particularly women, children and persons with disabilities, through improved access to healthcare, education and social protection.

He said: “We were mindful of the reality that the state must intervene to provide a robust safety net where the market and tradition fail. This recognition is translated into legislative support for healthcare initiatives, educational access, and social protection programmes that are meticulously targeted at the most vulnerable demographics: our women, our children, and persons with disabilities.”

On the protection of women and children, Bamidele said Nigeria’s laws must respond to emerging threats that cross geographical boundaries and exploit weaknesses in existing systems.

He stressed that justice must go beyond constitutional provisions and statutory declarations to become accessible and effective for victims of abuse.

He said justice should be more than “a promise merely expressed in the Constitution or a provision enshrined in our statute books. Rather, it must be accessible, affordable, timely, and effective.

“A woman who suffers domestic violence must be able to seek protection without intimidation or social condemnation. A child who experiences abuse must be heard, protected from further harm, and provided with appropriate support.

“Victims must have access to legal assistance, medical care, and psychosocial services, while perpetrators must be held accountable in accordance with due process and the rule of law,” the Senate leader said.

See also  Solomon Islands’ PM survives attempt to oust government

He called for stronger collaboration among the legislature, executive, judiciary, law enforcement agencies, social welfare institutions, religious organisations, traditional rulers, civil society groups and the private sector to strengthen the protection of women and children.

Bamidele charged FIDA to deepen engagement with the National Assembly and other relevant institutions, particularly in identifying gaps in existing laws, proposing reforms and ensuring that government policies and budgetary provisions translate into tangible benefits for vulnerable Nigerians.

In her address, the Vice-Chancellor of Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Prof. Smaranda Olarinde, called for stronger legal and institutional frameworks to protect women and children against emerging forms of abuse, particularly those enabled by technology and economic vulnerabilities.

The VC said that the increasing use of AI and digital platforms had created new dimensions of threats, including cyberstalking, online harassment, deepfake images, impersonation and exploitation of children, as she called for stronger collaboration among government, the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, universities, religious and traditional leaders, the media and civil society organisations to tackle gender-based violence and child abuse.

The Chief Judge of Ekiti State, Justice Lekan Ogunmoye, described the Senate leader as a perfect person to speak on the emerging issues towards initiating legislative and policy reforms in protection of women and children.

In her welcome address, FIDA Chairperson, Ekiti State chapter, Ayobami Olowoyo-Richards, reiterated the association’s commitment to promoting, protecting and preserving the rights of women and children.

Olowoyo-Richards, who said that the changing realities had continued to present new and complex concerns for the safety, dignity, and fundamental rights of women and children, urged, “We must continually strengthen our laws, institutions, and collective response to ensure that justice remains accessible, effective, and responsive to their needs.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

FG tightens payroll checks as salaries gulp N1.96tn, read details

Published

on

The Federal Government has introduced stricter verification requirements for newly recruited workers seeking admission into its payroll, as personnel costs rose by N133.94bn to N1.96tn in the first quarter of 2026, exceeding capital expenditure during the period.

An analysis by The PUNCH, of the Federal Government’s First Quarter Budget Implementation Reports for 2025 and 2026 showed that personnel expenditure increased by 7.35 per cent from N1.82tn in the corresponding period of 2025, reflecting growing pressure on public finances.

The new measures were announced on Monday by the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation in a statement signed by its Director of Press and Public Relations, Bawa Mokwa.

The OAGF said the directive, which takes immediate effect, applies to all ongoing and subsequent payroll admission processes under the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System.

The statement read, “Henceforth, no newly recruited employee shall be enrolled without first being captured on the nominal roll of the relevant MDA and satisfying all prescribed validation and eligibility requirements.”

According to the 2026 First Quarter Budget Implementation Report, the Federal Government spent N1.96tn on personnel costs between January and March, compared with N1.69tn on capital expenditure.

This means salaries and related personnel obligations exceeded capital spending by approximately N267bn, or 15.77 per cent.

Personnel expenditure accounted for 20.05 per cent of the Federal Government’s total expenditure of N9.76tn, while capital expenditure represented 17.32 per cent.

A breakdown showed that personnel costs for Ministries, Departments and Agencies increased from N1.57tn in the first quarter of 2025 to N1.70tn in the corresponding period of 2026, representing an increase of N133.94bn, or 8.54 per cent.

Personnel expenditure by Government-Owned Enterprises remained unchanged at N254.35bn, indicating that the entire increase in the reported wage bill came from MDAs.

The figures further showed that the Federal Government spent an average of N652.37bn monthly on personnel costs during the review period, compared with N607.73bn in the corresponding period of 2025.

Despite the increase, actual personnel spending remained below the quarterly budget projection.

The Budget Office disclosed that N8.35tn was allocated to MDAs’ personnel costs in the 2026 budget, compared with N7.60tn in 2025, representing an increase of approximately N758.51bn, or 9.99 per cent.

The report stated, “The sum of N8.35tn was appropriated for MDAs Personnel Cost in the 2026 Budget. This translates to a prorated quarterly expenditure outlay of N2.09tn in 2026. Actual expenditure of N1.70tn was released in the first quarter of 2026, translating to N385.78bn (18.47 percent) below the quarterly projection for the year.”

While personnel expenditure continued to rise, implementation of the Federal Government’s capital budget remained significantly below expectations.

The report showed that total capital expenditure of N1.69tn fell short of the prorated quarterly projection of N8.07tn by N6.38tn, representing a shortfall of 79.06 per cent.

More significantly, no funds were released for the implementation of MDAs’ 2026 capital budget during the quarter, despite a prorated allocation of N3.92tn.

Explaining the development, the Budget Office stated, “Funds for MDAs’ capital expenditure were not released in the first quarter of 2026 because some MDAs were still utilising funds released under the 2025 capital budget, whose implementation period had been extended to 31st December, 2026.”

See also  Ramaphosa slams xenophobic violence, vows illegal immigrants arrest

Consequently, implementation of the 2026 MDAs’ capital budget stood at zero as of March 31, although expenditure was recorded under other capital components, including GOEs, the Tertiary Education Trust Fund and externally financed projects.

GOEs accounted for N740.32bn in capital expenditure, while TETFund spending stood at N393.56bn. Multilateral and bilateral project-tied loans contributed N287.44bn, while grants and donor-funded projects accounted for N249.50bn.

The pressure was further reflected in non-debt recurrent expenditure, which increased from N2.24tn in the first quarter of 2025 to N2.77tn in the corresponding period of 2026, representing an increase of approximately N523.49bn.

Personnel costs accounted for 70.73 per cent of non-debt recurrent spending during the period.

Expenditure on pensions and gratuities, including service-wide pensions, also increased from N161.60bn to N330.72bn, representing a rise of N169.12bn, or 104.65 per cent.

When pensions and gratuities are combined with personnel costs, the Federal Government’s expenditure on these obligations reached N2.29tn, compared with N1.98tn in the corresponding period of 2025.

However, pensions and gratuities are classified separately from personnel costs in the budget implementation reports.

The rising obligations coincided with weak revenue performance.

According to the Budget Office, the Federal Government generated approximately N5.08tn in the first quarter of 2026, against a quarterly target of N9.22tn, representing a shortfall of 44.93 per cent.

Personnel costs alone were equivalent to 38.56 per cent of actual revenue, compared with approximately 36.80 per cent in the corresponding period of 2025.

This means that for every N100 received by the Federal Government during the quarter, an amount equivalent to nearly N39 was spent on personnel costs.

Debt-service payments further constrained government finances, reaching N4.63tn, equivalent to approximately 91.18 per cent of actual revenue.

Combined personnel costs and debt-service obligations amounted to N6.58tn, exceeding government revenue by approximately N1.51tn.

The Federal Government recorded a fiscal deficit of N4.69tn during the period.

The Budget Office acknowledged the need to contain recurrent spending, noting that restrictions on unapproved recruitment remained part of the government’s expenditure management measures.

It stated, “The FGN continued to pursue its goal of curbing the growth of recurrent expenditure as stated in the 2026-2028 MTEF/FSP.”

The report added, “Key initiatives aimed at reducing recurrent costs were therefore pursued vigorously during the period. This includes the embargo on unapproved recruitment by MDAs.”

It explained that recruitment and payroll enrolment requests must first obtain clearance from the Budget Office, while efforts to extend IPPIS coverage across federal establishments were continuing.

Under the latest arrangement, MDAs will assume greater responsibility for managing personnel budgets and maintaining accurate nominal rolls.

The OAGF explained that agencies seeking to enrol newly recruited employees must submit formal requests accompanied by recruitment approvals, appointment letters, applicable waivers and other supporting documents.

These records will undergo verification alongside salary structures, grade levels, salary steps, allowances and other financial entitlements to establish the legitimacy of appointments and the accuracy of payroll obligations.

See also  Flooding: Stop blocking gutters with garbage – Abia Govt cautions residents (PHOTOS)

The statement added, “The validation process will also cover statutory details, including Pension Fund Administrator information, pension identification numbers, National Housing Fund registration and tax records to ensure accurate deductions and timely remittances.”

Following the initial verification, employee records will be forwarded to the relevant MDA for confirmation and endorsement by the Accounting Officer, Director of Human Resources, Director of Finance and Accounts, and designated Payroll Validating Officer.

The records will then be returned to the OAGF for final processing.

The office stated, “Final admission into the Federal Government payroll will be subject to satisfactory completion of all validation procedures and the approval of the Accountant-General of the Federation.”

Permanent Secretaries, Heads of Agencies and other relevant officials have been directed to ensure strict compliance with the requirements.

The OAGF warned that incomplete documentation or unresolved discrepancies would result in the deferment of payroll admission until the necessary conditions were satisfied.

It added that officers responsible for processing and approving payroll admissions would be held accountable for breaches of applicable rules and regulations.

The Federal Government’s wage bill is expected to rise further as it approved a monthly allowance of N70,000 for public servants beginning in November, following a conciliation meeting with the Nigeria Labour Congress, the country’s biggest workers association, in Abuja.

The agreement provides for the payment across all levels for six months, although it did not specify the number of beneficiaries or the total amount budgeted for the intervention.

The PUNCH estimated that the Federal Government’s six-month transport allowance for its workers could cost about N465.7bn if all 1.1 million employee records on its payroll system qualify for the payment.

The economists, however, called for sustainable measures to reduce commuting costs and ease pressure on household budgets.

The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria, however, rejected the N70,000 wage award to cushion transportation expenses.

Instead, the TUC demanded an immediate salary increase for workers and the implementation of outstanding agreements with health workers under the Joint Health Sector Unions.

Experts demand discipline

Reacting to the development, a Nigerian economist, public affairs analyst and Chief Executive Officer of CSA Advisory, Dr Aliyu Ilias, expressed concern that personnel expenditure had exceeded capital spending, warning that the trend could undermine investment in critical infrastructure.

Speaking in an interview with The PUNCH, Ilias said the government needed to prioritise capital projects because of their importance to education, healthcare, transportation and other essential services.

He said, “It is an anomaly to have personnel costs higher than capital expenditure because social infrastructure is very critical. It benefits education, healthcare, road infrastructure, among others.”

The economist argued that the government’s expenditure pattern was particularly troubling because salaries and debt-service obligations were consuming resources needed for development.

He acknowledged that both obligations were difficult to avoid, especially given the declining purchasing power of workers, but maintained that the situation raised serious concerns about fiscal priorities.

See also  Women protest in Abuja for reserved seats bill

“Remember that debt servicing is an obligation that you must meet, and salary payment is something you cannot delay. Even if you look at purchasing power, it is very poor. Disposable income is not enough for people to manage,” he said.

Ilias also criticised the repeated extension of budget implementation periods, arguing that the practice had weakened clarity and accountability in public expenditure.

He called on the National Assembly to strengthen its oversight of budget implementation and demand explanations for the government’s spending priorities.

“When we don’t have clear budgets, these are the things that we are likely to see,” he said.

He added that improved revenue collections and potential gains from higher crude oil prices should provide opportunities for increased infrastructure investment.

According to him, the National Assembly has a responsibility to scrutinise the government’s expenditure decisions and provide Nigerians with information on how public resources are being utilised.

Also speaking, an investment banking and financial policy expert and Chief Executive Officer of CFG Advisory, Dr Tilewa Adebajo, warned that Nigeria’s fiscal position was becoming increasingly difficult to sustain, with recurrent obligations and debt servicing limiting the resources available for productive investment.

Adebajo said the figures reflected the severe fiscal pressure facing the government and raised questions about the sustainability of its economic reform programme.

“What you are telling me now is not a surprise. These numbers are not a surprise to us because it is clear from the way government has been spending that government is under severe fiscal pressure,” he said.

He warned that macroeconomic reforms alone would not deliver meaningful improvements in living standards without stronger economic growth, fiscal discipline and investment in productive sectors.

“Reforms by themselves are definitely not enough,” he said.

The financial expert stressed that capital expenditure was essential to expanding the economy, warning that persistent underfunding of development projects could undermine the benefits of macroeconomic stabilisation.

“If you do not fund your capital budget, that is the investment needed to grow the economy. The economy will not grow,” Adebajo said.

He argued that the government needed to shift its attention towards policies capable of stimulating productivity, attracting private investment, expanding exports and improving household welfare.

“The next phase must be fiscal discipline, productivity, private sector investment and export diversification, and improvements in household welfare,” he stated.

Adebajo maintained that the country needed a credible strategy to achieve economic growth of between eight and 10 per cent, noting that stabilising macroeconomic indicators was only the foundation for improving living standards.

“Macroeconomic stability is the foundation for economic prosperity. It is not the destination,” he said.

He further expressed concern about the government’s borrowing plans and the transparency of public expenditure, calling for stronger scrutiny of compliance with fiscal regulations.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending