Connect with us

Politics

Convention: Four PDP governors storm Ibadan as INEC signals boycott

Published

on

Four governors of the Peoples Democratic Party have arrived in Ibadan, Oyo State, as the party pushes forward with its national convention despite a Federal High Court order suspending the exercise.

The South-West chairman of the party, Kamorudeen Ajisafe, on Friday, confirmed the development to Saturday PUNCH.

He confirmed the presence of the governors of Bauchi (Bala Mohammed), Zamfara (Dauda Lawal), Adamawa (Ahmadu Fintiri) and Oyo (Seyi Makinde) ahead of the convention.

Conflicting court rulings

The PDP has been engulfed in crises, with factions loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesome Wike, and the acting Chairman Umar Damagum, locked in a bitter confrontation over the convention scheduled for today and Sunday, November 16.

In the build-up to the convention, a former governor of Jigawa, Sule Lamido, approached the Federal High Court in Abuja to seek justice after being denied the opportunity to purchase the PDP national chairmanship nomination form.

Delivering judgment on Friday, Justice Peter Lifu ordered the party to suspend the convention.

He also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from supervising, monitoring or recognising any convention conducted by the PDP without including the plaintiff as a contestant.

Justice Lifu held that evidence before the court established that Lamido was denied the opportunity to obtain a nomination form to contest for the position of National Chairman of the party.

The court affirmed that the PDP was duty-bound to create opportunities for its members to serve by adopting deliberate measures that enabled them to pursue their political aspirations.

As a consequential order, Justice Lifu directed that the planned convention be put on hold to allow Lamido to obtain the nomination form, mobilise supporters and conduct his campaign.

“An order is hereby made that before any convention is held, the PDP is to make nomination forms available to the plaintiff,” the judge declared.

Recall that on Tuesday, November 11, 2025, Justice Lifu delivered a similar ruling restraining the PDP from holding the convention, which was intended to elect new national officers to lead the party.

Lamido, through his counsel, Jephthah Njikonye, SAN, had filed an ex parte motion, seeking an interim injunction to stop the convention pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.

The former Jigawa State governor, in his suit, stated that if the PDP was not restrained, the party would be violating its constitution and, by implication, denying him the opportunity to contest for the position of national chairman.

Justice Lifu, while delivering a ruling in the motion, held that the plaintiff’s application had merit and consequently restrained the PDP from convening the event pending the determination of the substantive matter before the court.

He argued that there was no reason to depart from an earlier ruling delivered by Justice James Omotosho of the same court on October 31, 2025, which similarly halted the planned convention and restrained INEC from participating.

However, in a conflicting order, the Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan on November 3 permitted the PDP to proceed with the convention.

Justice Ladiran Akintola approved the convention while ruling on an ex parte application filed by an Oyo PDP member, Mr Folahan Adelabi, and directed INEC to attend and monitor the convention for the election of new national officers.

Reacting to Friday’s ruling, Ajisafe denied knowledge of Lifu’s new order.

He said, “We’re not aware of any fresh court ruling. This is almost 6 o’clock, and none of the party’s leaders is aware of the ruling you’re talking about.

“The convention will hold. Nothing will stop it because we are obeying the Ibadan High Court ruling that directed us to proceed with the convention.

“As I speak to you, we already have four governors from Bauchi, Zamfara, Adamawa and Oyo states on the ground. We are 98 per cent ready for the convention, and nothing will stop us.”

Delegates arrive venue

Checks by our correspondents, who were at the venue of the convention on Friday night, confirmed that preparations for the event had been completed.

Delegates from different states were seen in elated mood as they danced to the rhythm of traditional drums.

Around past 8pm, the Chairman of Adamawa PDP, Hamza Madagali, came to the venue of the convention with his entourage, perhaps to assess the level of preparedness for the elective convention.

Our correspondents also reliably gathered that delegates from Lagos, FCT, Bauchi, Akwa Ibom, Ebonyi, Delta had arrived at the venue, while delegates from other states were still trooping in as of the time of this report.

An Armoured Personnel Carrier with stern-looking security operatives was also noticed at the entrance to the convention venue.

See also  2027 Elections: PDP ticket zoning to South splits North

INEC signals boycott

Saturday PUNCH reliably gathered that INEC would not be monitoring the convention.

A senior official of the commission involved in monitoring party conventions said, “INEC will not monitor the PDP convention.”

Another INEC official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, stressed the commission’s commitment to the law.

“INEC is law-abiding. We will obey the FCT High Court,” the source said.

Saturday PUNCH learnt that the commission had earlier prepared a press statement to clarify its position on whether it would monitor the convention, but the statement was later withdrawn.

Attempts to reach the Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Victoria Eta-Messi, were unsuccessful, as she neither answered her calls nor replied to messages.

Efforts to speak with other directors in the commission also yielded no response.

Lamido blames govs for crisis

Speaking on the convention, Lamido urged the party to obey the latest court ruling.

Lamido, who spoke while appearing on Channels TV Politics Today on Friday, blamed party governors for the crisis in the party.

He said, “There is a judgement stopping the convention and asking the party to invite me and give me my form to fill and go through the normal campaign and go to the election.

“We had 14 governors, but now we have only three remaining. And even among the three, two are going. The problem came from the governors because they are eroded with their own notion that they are now in charge. There is no governor; the only governor is Seyi Makinde, who I so much respect because he is a very nice young man.”

When asked if he would be attending the convention, Lamido said, “I am now a creation of the court order and therefore being somebody saved by the court, I can’t go to the convention undermining and renouncing something I gained from the court. If I go to the convention, it will mean whatever I got in has been washed away. So, I can’t go there.”

He added, “They want somebody they can control. This party produced three presidents, how many governors, senators, the Senate President, and Ambassadors. The governors of today are emperors.”

Wike, Bode George clash

A chieftain of the party, Bode George, and Wike, who also spoke on the TV programme, traded tackles over the court order suspending the convention.

George, a founding member of the PDP and former Board of Trustees member, dismissed claims of a party crisis.

He said the party remained “solid and undivided.”

George expressed surprise over Lamido’s decision to take the party to court.

“The way things are done, I am hell shocked that he took the party to court. The last NEC meeting, the date for collection of forms was stipulated. What they are supposed to do, when they are supposed to return the forms, were all well stated and approved by NEC,” he said.

He alleged that Lamido missed the official schedule for obtaining and returning nomination forms.

“Everybody who wanted to collect forms applied, paid the normal dues, and they gave you the form. But on his own side, he came physically on the very day that the return of forms closed. Of course, with his status, if he had called them earlier, they would oblige him because of his status, but to now go to court because they didn’t give you the form. That day was the last day to return the forms. Did he do what is right?”

He reaffirmed that the party’s convention would proceed, noting that the court under Justice Ladiran Akintola had allowed operations to continue until Monday, November 18, with a final judgment expected on December 8.

Wike defended the court ruling suspending the convention.

The minister called on the party to respect the ruling and suspend the convention.

“I am a respecter of the law. I have heard Sule Lamido, I have heard our father, Chief Olabode George, but it is unfortunate that at the level of Chief Olabode George, you don’t know the difference between a substantive judgement and an ex parte order,” Wike said.

He explained that the Federal High Court had already delivered a substantive judgement on October 31, 2025.

“And again, Sule Lamido went to court challenging the party that it cannot continue with the convention because it denied him his right,” Wike noted.

The minister argued that a subsequent Ibadan court order was an ex parte order, not a substantive judgement.

“The court in Ibadan gave an ex parte order and then extended that ex parte order. Are you now telling us that an ex parte order will override a substantive judgement of a court?” he asked.

See also  David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

NWC, govs urged to accept reconciliation report

Meanwhile, the South-South Zonal Secretary of the party, George Turna, as well as the Forum of PDP State Chairmen, have called on the national leaders of the party and PDP governors to accept the recommendations of the reconciliation committee set up by the Board of Trustees in good faith.

They also called on the NWC and PDP governors to suspend the convention.

Addressing a press conference on Friday, Turna noted that the processes leading up to the Ibadan convention did not align with the party’s constitution and guidelines, the Electoral Act, 2022, and the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

He said, “Principal among our concerns was the conduct of state congresses. We believed that, by our procedures, state congresses ought to have been concluded in almost all states — or at least a substantial number — to form the bulk of delegates to the national convention.”

“We looked forward to guidelines; none were issued. We expected a timetable; we couldn’t find any. We sought information on procedures, including the purchase of forms; nothing was made available.

“Out of these frustrations, we approached the court to seek answers. It is now public knowledge that we obtained judgment in our favour, delivered by Honourable Justice Omotosho of the Federal High Court on October 31, 2025.

“It is important to clarify, because false narratives have spread, that we acted as proxies to stop the PDP convention, or that we are undermining the party’s progress. In the build-up to this and following the judgment, the party’s Board of Trustees set up a fact-finding committee. The committee reviewed the crisis and produced a report. As party members, we had access to the report.”

He noted that the report by the BoT Reconciliation Committee had vindicated the position of party stakeholders that the affairs of the PDP had been conducted in violation of certain principles and procedures.

Also speaking, the Imo State Chairman of the party, Austin Nwachukwu, said, “Justice Lifu has delivered another judgment aligning with the issues we raised in our own suit.

“This particular suit was filed by former Governor of Jigawa State, Sule Lamido, who was denied the opportunity to obtain forms to contest at the planned convention. He was understandably upset, as a foundation member and elder statesman of the party.

“The court held that it was wrong and unjust to deny Sule Lamido the right to participate in a convention of this magnitude and ordered that he must be allowed to purchase forms and participate in any future convention. The court also cautioned the PDP to stop acts of impunity.

“This again vindicates our position. While some individuals rushed to Ibadan to obtain an ex parte order from a High Court, we followed due process and the rule of law — and the court has again justified our actions.”

On his part, the Abia State Chairman of the PDP, Amah Abraham, commended the BoT Reconciliation Committee for prioritising the party’s interests above all in its recommendations.

Govs, NWC press ahead

Despite the recommendations, PDP stakeholders, including the four governors have reportedly converged on Ibadan for the convention.

The party is now operating under two rival factions, raising concerns that internal conflict may deepen ahead of the 2027 elections.

Governors Mohammed, Makinde, and Muftwang accused Wike of destabilising the party.

Meanwhile, the National Working Committee defended disciplinary actions against some national officers, accusing them of taking instructions from Wike.

The suspended officials countered, alleging hidden agendas and unconstitutional actions by the NWC and governors.

Former Senate President Bukola Saraki warned that proceeding under the current conditions could cause irreparable damage, recommending the formation of an all-inclusive caretaker committee.

He also advised that first-term governors in Osun, Plateau, and Zamfara could defect if the crisis persisted.

Saraki further recommended that future amendments to the PDP constitution strip the Governors’ Forum of its status as a party organ to prevent recurrence of such conflicts.

Internal divisions threaten party stability

But prominent stakeholders of the PDP, including Adamawa State Governor, Ahmadu Fintiri, converged on Ibadan on Friday for the party’s national convention.

The PDP, once Nigeria’s dominant political force for 16 straight years, is battling what its Board of Trustees Chairman, Senator Adolphus Wabara, described as a “self-inflicted crisis.”

With two rival factions now operating from separate secretariats, the party is grappling with an internal turmoil that threatens its cohesion ahead of the 2027 general election.

See also  Anambra Voter Laments ₦1,000 Stipend For Votes

In a bid to restore order, the BoT on November 5, inaugurated a reconciliation committee chaired by Ambassador Hassan Adamu.

The six-man panel submitted its report days later, recommending that the convention be postponed until all aggrieved parties had been reconciled.

However, the advice—supported by former Senate President Bukola Saraki—was ignored by the Umar Damagum-led National Working Committee.

A leaked copy of the report, sighted by Saturday PUNCH, revealed that the committee found widespread distrust across party ranks.

It also documented Wike’s objections to the committee’s neutrality, noting that its inauguration in the presence of the Damagum-led NWC had compromised its credibility.

“Wike faulted the BoT for publicly siding with the acting national chairman’s camp and accused the zoning committee of shutting out critical stakeholders,” the report reads in part.

The report further states that “Wike accused the PDP Governors’ Forum, led by Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed and Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde, of hijacking party processes. He also alleged that Taraba State Governor, Agbu Kefas, was covertly collaborating with the ruling All Progressives Congress.

“Wike raised concerns about cancelled congresses in states such as Anambra and Ebonyi and insisted that the Ibadan convention could only hold if Abuja court orders were obeyed. He vowed to continue challenging what he described as the governors’ refusal to honour agreements,” the report read in part.

During its session with the committee, Governor Bala Mohammed—accompanied by Governors Makinde and Caleb Muftwang of Plateau—accused Wike of destabilising the party and violating its constitution.

He alleged that Wike was bent on controlling the PDP and weakening its foundations, describing the former Rivers governor as “trouble-prone” and unwilling to cease hostilities.

The NWC, in its submission, defended the suspension of National Secretary Senator Samuel Anyanwu, National Legal Adviser Kamaldeen Ajibade, and National Organising Secretary Umar Bature.

The Acting Chairman Damagum said the trio were disciplined for alleged indiscipline and anti-party activities, “accusing them of taking instructions from Wike.

Bature was accused of running “a one-man show,” while Ajibade was said to have compromised the party’s legal interests.”

But the suspended officials pushed back, accusing the NWC of disobeying valid court orders and alleging that Governors Diri, Bala and Makinde were pursuing hidden agendas.

“They maintained that the suspension of the South-East Vice Chairman, Ali Odefa, was valid and insisted that documents signed by him since then were illegal.

They also accused Damagum of incompetence, describing Makinde as a core contributor to the party’s crisis.”

Saraki, in his meeting with the committee, said he had deliberately distanced himself from President Bola Tinubu since the latter assumed office, insisting on prioritising party stability above personal political relationships.

He warned that the unresolved crisis surrounding the national secretary’s office and the governors’ “ego-driven decisions” had pushed the party to the brink. According to him, “governors had originally agreed to concede the Rivers PDP structure to Wike but later reneged, triggering renewed hostilities.”

Saraki warned that proceeding with the convention under current conditions risked “irreparable damage,” and recommended the formation of an inclusive caretaker committee.

He also cautioned that first-term PDP governors in Osun, Plateau and Zamfara could defect ahead of their re-election battles if the crisis persists.

He further advised that the next amendment to the PDP constitution should strip the Governors’ Forum of its status as a party organ.

The reconciliation committee’s report underscored deep mistrust between the governors and the NWC, noting that ambitions for 2027 had distorted the party’s internal cohesion. It warned that lingering litigation, shifting loyalties, and internal power blocs had severely weakened the PDP’s operational structure.

The committee recommended that the Ibadan convention be held “Only if legal conditions were favourable and if INEC was willing to monitor the exercise. It cautioned that multiple conflicting court orders would likely deter INEC from doing so.”

It is therefore advised that the party immediately revert to status quo ante, lift all suspensions, and establish an all-inclusive caretaker committee to manage its affairs.

It further urged strict adherence to party supremacy, constitutional discipline, and neutrality from the BoT, warning against any attempt to formalise the Governors’ Forum as an organ of the party.

Despite these warnings, the NWC—backed by the PDP Governors’ Forum—pressed ahead with the Ibadan convention, raising concerns that the party’s internal conflict could worsen in the weeks ahead.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

A three-horse race as Ekiti goes to poll

Published

on

Just days to the June 20 governorship election in Ekiti State, the political atmosphere is steadily reaching a crescendo as parties intensify last-minute campaigns and voter mobilisation efforts across the 16 local government areas of the state. In this report, ’YOMI AYELESO examines the factors likely to shape the outcome of the election, the strengths and challenges confronting the leading political parties.

The people of Ekiti State will on Saturday, June 20, head to the polls to elect a governor who will steer the affairs of the state for another four-year term beginning from October 16, 2026. Following months of political campaigns, consultations, grassroots engagements and strategic mobilisation, candidates and political parties are now making final efforts to consolidate support and secure victory.

Unlike previous governorship contests in the state, particularly the fiercely contested 2022 election, developments in the months preceding this year’s exercise suggest a different political reality. While the contest remains open, many political observers and analysts believe the incumbent governor enjoys a considerable advantage heading into the election.

Governor Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji of the All Progressives Congress (APC), popularly known as BAO, secured his first term in office in 2022 after defeating former Governor Segun Oni of the then Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Bisi Kolawole of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Oyebanji polled 187,057 votes, representing 53 per cent of the valid votes cast. Segun Oni garnered 82,211 votes, representing 23 per cent, while Kolawole scored 67,457 votes, accounting for 19 per cent of the votes.

As the state prepares for another election cycle, the political dynamics have shifted. While the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has confirmed that 15 political parties are participating in the poll, prevailing political realities indicate that the contest has largely narrowed to three parties — the APC, the PDP and the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

• APC and Oyebanji’s quest for continuity

There is little doubt that Governor Oyebanji enters the election as the candidate to beat. In the last three years and eight months, the governor, who hails from Ikogosi-Ekiti in Ekiti Central Senatorial District, has carved a reputation for inclusive governance and a leadership style that many residents describe as markedly different from those of his predecessors. His administration’s six-point Shared Prosperity Agenda has become the central pillar of his re-election campaign.

See also  David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

Across critical sectors including education, healthcare, infrastructure, agriculture, economic development and social investment, the administration has implemented programmes aimed at improving the welfare of residents. The impact of these interventions has been felt among civil servants, pensioners, artisans, women, transport workers, youths and vulnerable groups across the state.

The governor’s achievements and consensus-building approach to governance have attracted endorsements from across political divides. Notably, four former governors of the state, Adeniyi Adebayo, Ayodele Fayose, Dr Kayode Fayemi and Chief Segun Oni, have publicly expressed support for his re-election bid. Influential figures within the state’s elite class, including legal luminaries such as Chief Afe Babalola, SAN and Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, have also identified with the administration.

Beyond elite endorsements, the APC enjoys significant structural advantages. The party controls all nine National Assembly seats from the state, 26 seats in the Ekiti State House of Assembly, the 16 local government councils and the 22 Local Council Development Areas (LCDAs). Over the past three years, more than 300 groups, associations, communities and traditional institutions across the state have declared support for Oyebanji’s second-term ambition. These factors have strengthened the belief among APC supporters that the party is on course for a convincing victory.

However, despite the favourable outlook, challenges remain. One factor capable of creating some internal discomfort is the outcome of the recently concluded APC State and National Assembly primaries. Of the six House of Representatives members currently serving, only three secured return tickets, while three lost out. Similarly, 20 out of the 26 members of the State House of Assembly failed to obtain tickets for another term, leaving pockets of dissatisfaction within the party.

Should Governor Oyebanji secure victory on Saturday, he would set a new political record as the first governor in Ekiti State’s history to win two consecutive terms in office.

• PDP’s Oluyede and the narrow road to victory

See also  Abure kicks as Labour Party faction claims court stops nationwide congress

For the PDP, the June 20 election presents both an opportunity and a formidable challenge. The party enters the race weakened by years of internal divisions and factional disputes that have affected its cohesion and electoral strength. Nonetheless, its candidate, Dr Wole Oluyede, remains optimistic about his chances and has continued to project confidence throughout the campaign.

Oluyede, an indigene of Ikere-Ekiti in Ekiti South Senatorial District, is no stranger to Ekiti politics. He contested the APC governorship primary in 2018, later emerged as the ADC governorship candidate in 2022, and is now flying the PDP flag in the current contest. His repeated participation in Ekiti’s electoral cycles has helped maintain his visibility among voters.

His home town of Ikere-Ekiti, one of the state’s largest voting blocs after Ado-Ekiti, could provide a significant electoral base. The argument in some quarters that the community should produce a governor rather than continue occupying the deputy governor’s office may resonate with sections of the electorate.

The broader agitation for an Ekiti South governor also remains a factor. Since the creation of the state and the return to democratic governance in 1999, no governor has emerged from the southern senatorial district. Although zoning is not dominating campaign conversations as strongly as in previous elections, many residents of the zone still believe the time has come for power to shift southward.

However, any sentiment favouring the South Senatorial District may not exclusively benefit Oluyede, as ADC candidate Ambassador Dare Bejide also comes from the same zone.

Perhaps the biggest challenge confronting the PDP is the position of former Governor Ayodele Fayose, widely regarded as the party’s most influential figure in Ekiti politics. Fayose has openly endorsed Governor Oyebanji’s re-election and has consistently mobilised support for the APC candidate. Given Fayose’s enduring influence among party faithful and sections of the PDP structure, political observers believe his stance has significantly complicated the PDP’s pathway to victory.

The party’s deputy governorship candidate, Deji Ogunsakin from Ado-Ekiti, is expected to help galvanise support in the state capital, which remains the largest voting centre in Ekiti.

See also  Burkina Faso grounds Nigerian military aircraft over airspace violation

• ADC battles structural limitations despite growing appeal

The ADC has also emerged as a notable contender in the election. Its candidate, Ambassador Dare Bejide, is a familiar face in Ekiti politics, having served as Secretary to the State Government and Nigeria’s Ambassador to Canada. The seasoned politician and elder statesman from Ilawe-Ekiti has positioned himself as a credible alternative to both the APC and PDP.

The ADC gained momentum following the influx of prominent opposition politicians who adopted the party as a coalition platform last year. This development generated expectations that the party could become a major force in the governorship race but happenings in recent weeks and months are suggesting the fact that the ADC might not constitute threat for the office.

Among its notable figures are former Deputy Governor Professor Kolapo Olusola-Eleka, former Commissioner for Information Akin Omole, philanthropist Funsho Ayeni and several other influential politicians. Despite these strengths, the ADC faces a significant challenge: the absence of an extensive grassroots structure comparable to those of the APC and PDP.

Political observers argue that while the party enjoys visibility among politically active groups and sections of urban voters, translating that goodwill into votes across thousands of polling units may prove difficult.

The party’s deputy governorship candidate, Ayodeji Babatola, a former APC chieftain from Ado-Ekiti, is expected to strengthen ADC’s appeal in the state capital.

• The final verdict

As Ekiti voters prepare to make their choices, the election appears, on the surface, to favour the incumbent governor and the APC, buoyed by widespread endorsements, strong grassroots structures and the advantages of incumbency, including achievements in office. Yet elections are ultimately decided by voters, and the level of turnout, voter sentiment and election-day dynamics will play crucial roles in determining the final outcome.

Beyond the contest itself, the June 20 governorship election will serve as an important test for Nigeria’s electoral process under the new Electoral Act 2026 and a major indicator of political trends ahead of the 2027 general elections.

tribuneonlineng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

APC, PDP trade words over Pantami’s political membership status

Published

on

A fresh controversy has erupted in Gombe State over the political status of former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Ali Pantami, as the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party laid conflicting claims to his party membership.

The dispute followed Pantami’s emergence as the PDP governorship candidate ahead of the 2027 general elections, after the APC primary election produced Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The Gombe State chapter of the PDP insisted that Pantami had validly resigned from the APC and is now a bona fide member of the opposition party.

The APC, however, maintained that the former minister remains its member because due process was allegedly not followed in effecting his resignation.

Addressing journalists in Gombe on Tuesday, the APC Publicity Secretary, Moses Kyari, said the party’s executive committee in Pantami Ward had earlier clarified that it neither received nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Pantami.

“As you may recall, 25 out of the 27 members of the ward executive committee publicly stated that they neither saw nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Professor Ali Isa Pantami.

“They maintained that the claim was merely a fabrication orchestrated without the knowledge or approval of the ward executive committee,” Kyari said.

According to him, the ward chairman, Alhaji Bala Galda, disclosed that the alleged resignation letter was received on May 23, 2026, despite being dated May 19, and was delivered by one Abba Pantami.

“Despite repeated requests, members of the ward executive committee have not been provided with a copy of the said letter,” Kyari stated.

See also  Supreme Court fixes April 22 for hearing of PDP appeals, see why

He argued that under the provisions of the APC Constitution, the Independent National Electoral Commission guidelines and the Electoral Act, Pantami remained an APC member until the prescribed procedures were completed and verified.

“It is, therefore, our position that Professor Ali Isa Pantami remains a member of the APC until all due processes are properly followed and verified,” he said.

Kyari also dismissed claims allegedly made by Pantami during a televised interview on TVC that his defection to the PDP and governorship ambition had the blessing of President Bola Tinubu.

“We categorically reject this assertion. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a committed leader of the APC and has consistently demonstrated loyalty to the party. It is difficult to believe that the President would endorse activities that are contrary to the interests and unity of the APC,” he said.

He called on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify the issue to prevent misinformation.

“We, therefore, call on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify and dispel these claims in order to prevent misinformation and avoid misleading the people,” Kyari added.

However, in a swift response contained in a statement signed by its state Public Relations Officer, Abdulkadir Dukku, the PDP dismissed the APC’s position, insisting that Pantami had fulfilled all constitutional and legal requirements for membership of the opposition party.

“We wish to categorically state that Professor Pantami is a bona fide member of the Peoples Democratic Party, having duly complied with all the constitutional and legal requirements for membership of our party,” the PDP said.

See also  See why Bayelsa governor delayed defection to APC

The party further stated that it possessed documentary evidence confirming Pantami’s resignation from the APC.

“The PDP possesses all relevant documents confirming his resignation from his former party, acknowledged by his then ward chairman,” the statement read.

According to the PDP, the APC chairman in Pantami Ward personally acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter on May 19, 2026.

“The chairman of APC in Pantami Ward acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter in person on May 19, 2026, and subsequently posted it on social media, where it went viral,” the party added.

The opposition party described the APC’s repeated press briefings on the matter as unnecessary.

“It should be noted that this is the third time the APC has organised a press conference on the same issue, despite the facts being clear and well documented,” the statement said.

The PDP urged the ruling party to focus on preparations for the forthcoming elections rather than what it described as distractions.

“Consequently, we urge the APC in Gombe State to focus on preparing for the forthcoming general election instead of engaging in unnecessary distractions,” it stated.

The party also argued that the Constitution and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association.

“If the APC lacks confidence in its candidate, it should address its internal concerns instead of insisting that Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami must remain in the party.

“After all, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association,” the PDP said.

It added that the APC still had the opportunity, within the electoral process, to make decisions regarding its candidature if it believed its candidate could not effectively compete against Pantami.

See also  Amupitan pledges inclusivity as new INEC chairman

Reaffirming its stance ahead of the elections, the PDP said it remained committed to issue-based campaigns and providing credible leadership to the people of Gombe State.

“The PDP remains committed to issue-based campaigns and to providing the people of Gombe State with credible leadership, development and good governance,” the statement concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

Published

on

Following the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress and four other parties on Monday, ADC National Chairman Senator David Mark stated the judiciary is on trial and warned the Federal Government against political manipulation.

Stakeholders also called for sanctions against Justice Peter Lifu for flouting a superior court order, as the ADC assures supporters they will remain on the ballot.

Political parties and stakeholders affected by the Federal High Court’s controversial deregistration order welcomed the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the judgment.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja had on Tuesday ordered a stay of execution of the judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party, while delivering a stinging rebuke to Justice Lifu for flouting a May 22 appellate court order restraining him from delivering the ruling.

In a unanimous decision on Tuesday, a three-member panel led by Justice A. B. Mohammed condemned Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja for flouting a May 22 order that directed him to suspend proceedings before him, describing his conduct as the gravest form of judicial misconduct.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution,” the panel held.

The appellate court went further, invoking a Supreme Court precedent to characterise Justice Lifu’s conduct in the harshest terms.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is the highest form of judicial impertinence,” the panel declared, adding that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acted in such a manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

The court said it had a duty to assert its supervisory authority over lower courts and protect the integrity of the judicial hierarchy.

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This court has supervisory authority over the trial court. This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are obeyed. The application for stay of execution is hereby granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the panel ruled.

The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Lifu, had on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party, ruling that the five parties failed to meet the constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution, specifically, requirements related to securing at least 25 per cent of votes in certain states or winning seats in the 2023 general elections.

Earlier in Tuesday’s proceedings, INEC told the appellate court it was stunned by Justice Lifu’s decision to deliver the judgment, disclosing that the commission only learned of the ruling through media reports rather than any official notification.

INEC’s lead counsel, Mr Haliru Mohammed, told the panel that the commission had been aware of the appellate court’s May 22 order restraining the lower court from delivering the judgment, which had originally been reserved for June 5.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media. We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment,” Mohammed submitted.

The commission also aligned itself with the notice of appeal filed by the affected political parties.

Counsel to the ADC, Mr Shuaibu Aruwa, SAN, told the court that Justice Lifu communicated the judgment’s delivery to the party via WhatsApp, a disclosure that drew visible reactions from the bench.

See also  Make election rigging difficult — Peter Obi begs Nigerians to get PVC

Aruwa described the lower court’s conduct as an invitation to anarchy and urged the appellate court to invoke its disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution to sanction the judge.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay,” he added.

APC reacts

Reacting to the appellate court’s decision,  the ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the ruling offered a measure of hope for the judiciary’s credibility, though he was careful not to celebrate unreservedly.

“It indicates that the judiciary may still redeem itself. We are cautiously delighted but we insist that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place,” Abdullahi said in a telephone interview.

He called on the National Judicial Council to take urgent steps to rid the bench of judges whose conduct brought the institution into disrepute.

“We, therefore, hope that the judicial council will take urgent steps to purge the bench of judges who bring the judicial institution to disrepute,” he said.

The National Leader of the Action Peoples Party, Ikenga Ugochinyere, was more emphatic in his welcome of the ruling, describing it as a vindication of the party’s position from the outset and calling on the NJC to weed out what he termed controversial judges.

“There was no need to panic in the first place, and, so, this ruling is a vindication of our position from the get-go,” Ugochinyere said.

“We call on the NJC to weed out controversial justices who say one thing in the morning and another in the evening. These are the bad eggs giving the judiciary a bad name,” he added.

Ugochinyere raised broader concerns about public confidence in the justice system, warning that judicial inconsistency was eroding citizens’ respect for court pronouncements.

“Court pronouncements are supposed to be respected by citizens, particularly because they come from institutions established by law. But when people begin to hide behind technicalities, it raises concerns about the integrity of those institutions.

“How do we expect citizens to obey court judgments when many people no longer see justice as blind, but rather as something influenced by individuals and personal interests? That is the challenge before us,” the APP leader added.

He also noted that the controversy surrounding Justice Lifu’s ruling had sparked frustration across the country, with some of the anger directed at the presidency.

“This situation has generated a lot of reactions across the country. Many people are directing their frustrations at the President. Perhaps there is a need for greater clarity so that Nigerians understand exactly what is happening,” Ugochinyere said.

He nevertheless described Tuesday’s outcome as a victory for democracy and the rule of law.

“What happened today (Tuesday) is a victory, not just for democracy, but for the rule of law. We are happy because the courts have once again demonstrated their relevance in our democratic process,” he said.

Other parties speak

The Acting National Chairman of the Coalition of United Political Parties,  Peter Ameh, took a philosophical approach in welcoming the ruling, invoking the words of the philosopher Edmund Burke to frame the significance of the appellate court’s intervention.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” Ameh said.

He warned that what he described as hostile executive rascality and brazen judicial overreach must not be allowed to stand.

See also  Coalition demands Atiku and Obi’s full membership on 2027 Presidency

Also, the ADC presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar said in a statement posted on his X handle that the ruling was a positive development, noting with particular significance that INEC itself had initiated the application for the stay .

“I welcome the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the Federal High Court judgment seeking the deregistration of our great party, the ADC, and four other political parties. It is particularly significant that INEC itself initiated the application for the stay,” he wrote.

Atiku, Mark protest

The former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar also criticised what he described as judicial contradictions in the ongoing legal dispute, warning that such developments had placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny.

“The disturbing spectacle of judicial contradictions and politically charged rulings playing out in our courts has placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny. As ADC National Chairman, Sen. David Mark, rightly observed, the judiciary itself is now on trial,” Atiku said.

He warned against any attempt to weaponise the courts against Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

“Any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s hard-won democracy through judicial manipulation is a grave danger to the Republic. If our democracy suffers further injury, history will demand accountability from those entrusted with dispensing justice,” he said.

Following the judgment given by Justice Lifu, the National Judicial Council has been urged to investigate Justice Peter Lifu over his decision to deliver judgment in a case that was already before the Court of Appeal.

The civil society organisation, Tap Initiative for FOR Citizens’ Development, on Tuesday in a statement called on the leadership of the judiciary to immediately investigate Justice Lifu over the judgment.

The call follows concerns over the alleged disregard for the hierarchy of courts and implications such actions could have on the judiciary and Nigeria’s democracy as the country moves closer to the 2027 general elections.

Justice Lifu had on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties over their alleged breach of Section 225(A) of the Constitution.

However, the judgment was reportedly delivered despite an order staying proceedings issued by the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal on May 22.

The decision has since attracted criticism from several quarters, with critics accusing the judge of undermining democratic principles.

In a statement signed by its Executive Director, Mbasekei Martin Obono, the group urged the NJC to, among other things, “Determine whether the decision was delivered in disregard of pending appellate proceedings and a subsisting order of stay;

“Examine possible breaches of the judicial code of conduct; Take appropriate disciplinary action if misconduct is established; and

Reaffirm the authority of appellate courts and the supremacy of due process within the judiciary”.

The group recalled that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, had consistently emphasised the need for accountability, discipline and ethical conduct within the judiciary.

It disclosed that it had formally petitioned the CJN, in her capacity as Chairman of the NJC, seeking an investigation and possible disciplinary action against Justice Lifu.

According to the group, the petition presents an opportunity to reinforce the principles of accountability and demonstrate that judicial independence is not incompatible with responsibility.

“Tap Initiative expresses grave concern that at the time the said judgement was delivered, there were subsisting appellate proceedings before the Court of Appeal in respect of the same subject matter in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026. Furthermore, the Court of Appeal had issued an Enrolment Order expressly granting a stay of proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2025, being the very proceedings in which the Federal High Court subsequently proceeded to deliver judgment.

“This development raises profound constitutional and procedural concerns, as it appears that a valid order of stay and active appellate proceedings were in force at the material time. If established, this situation would constitute a serious affront to the doctrine of judicial hierarchy and the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal within Nigeria’s constitutional order.

See also  ADC ticket: Atiku rejects call to step down, attacks Tinubu

“Tap Initiative emphasizes that the integrity of Nigeria’s justice system depends fundamentally on strict adherence to judicial hierarchy, procedural discipline, and respect for appellate authority. Any deviation from these principles risks creating conflicting judicial outcomes, eroding legal certainty, and undermining public confidence in the courts”, he said.

The group stressed that the judiciary remains the last hope of the common citizen, arguing that its legitimacy is sustained not only by constitutional authority but also by unwavering public confidence in its fairness, discipline and respect for the rule of law.

It therefore called on the NJC to treat the matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves in the interest of justice, democracy and national stability.

Meanwhile, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Senator David Mark, on Tuesday declared that the Nigerian judiciary, rather than the opposition party, is the institution facing scrutiny over the controversy surrounding the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties.

Speaking at the ADC Strategic Communications Retreat in Abuja, the former Senate President accused the judiciary of actions capable of undermining public confidence in the nation’s democratic process, while questioning the conduct of Justice Peter Lifu in matters relating to the party.

According to Mark, the outcome of the controversy will test the credibility of the judiciary and the ability of the National Judicial Council to address concerns arising from the case.

“The ADC is not on trial. Rather, it is the judiciary that is on trial and the nation is waiting to see how the National Judicial Council is going to handle this precarious situation,” he said.

The ADC chairman expressed concern over what he described as unprecedented judicial actions, alleging that Justice Lifu ignored an order of the Court of Appeal directing a stay of proceedings in the matter.

He said it was difficult to comprehend how a judge could be involved in actions that appeared to contradict existing court directives.

Mark further alleged that the judge issued conflicting decisions regarding the status of the party within a short period.

“It is strange that a judge can order the Independent National Electoral Commission to pronounce a party dead and in less than 24 hours put the same party on trial,” he said.

The remarks come amid growing political tension over recent legal challenges affecting opposition parties ahead of preparations for the next electoral cycle.

Despite the legal setback, Mark urged party members not to lose confidence in the ADC, insisting that the party would emerge stronger from the dispute.

“Like I have said previously, our members should not worry about the shenanigans of the ruling party. We will go through all these turbulence because we are up to the task. By the time we are through all these, ADC will come out stronger,” he stated.

The former Senate President also accused the ruling All Progressives Congress APC of attempting to weaken opposition forces through distractions, claiming that the governing party was struggling to defend its record in office.

He alleged that the President Bola Tinubu-led government is diverting attention from its challenges by targeting opposition platforms.

Addressing party communicators at the retreat, Mark charged them to craft messages capable of expanding the ADC’s appeal across political divides, including among members of the ruling party.

He challenged the communications team to develop persuasive narratives that would attract more Nigerians to the ADC project.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending