Connect with us

News

Call to scrap LGs in Nigeria, transfer authority to traditional rulers sparks fresh debate

Published

on

More than one year after local government areas got what could be described as favourable landmark judgement, they are yet to be freed from the grip of state governors.

In July 2024, the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of local government autonomy, affirming the financial and administrative independence of Nigeria’s 774 local councils by declaring actions by state governments unconstitutional.

The landmark judgment prohibited states from dissolving elected councils, installing caretaker committees, withholding funds allocated to local governments from the federation account, and managing local government finances.

However, the full implementation of that judgement remains a mirage, opening further calls that the local government system should be scrapped.

A former presidential aspirant of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Adamu Garba, reopened the debate recently when he called for the scrapping of local governments in Nigeria.

Garba said local governments should be scrapped because State governors use it as a back channel to loot funds, stressing that its power should be transferred to traditional rulers within their domain.

“Local governments take their legislation from the state assemblies and you know what that means. Autonomy or not, the LGs are still ATMs of some state governors.

“In reality, there is no country on earth that has a third tier of government except Nigeria. Since it proved to be non-workable, why not scrap it?

“Instead of struggling to get constitutional authority for our traditional rulers, they should be handed over the local government councils and let them run it according to the local culture and tradition of the people within their domain.

“All entitlements due to LGs should be channeled to the leadership of the traditional rulers of such areas. A form of pre-colonial Native Authority we used to have and was very very effective.”

Scrap SIEC not local governments – AA National Chairman

The National Chairman of Action Alliance, AA, Kenneth Udeze, disagreed with the clamour for the scrapping of local governments in Nigeria.

Udeze pointed out that local governments are a necessary tool in conveying the dividends of democracy to the grassroots.

See also  Ivory Coast opposition party calls for rally against election violence

Speaking , Udeze said: “I don’t agree with that school of thought at all, the only challenge we have in Nigeria is leadership and bad governance that has brought us down to our knees where we are today.

“Yes, in as much as some people can argue that local government is a backend for people to cash out, where things are done properly, we can’t say we have three tiers of government from the federal to state and local government and at the end of the day, we still have issues.

“If the Supreme Court of the land has actually made a pronouncement with respect to issues of sending the local government allocations directly to them with the hopes that leaders, politicians, and administrators make sure that the strict letters of the pronouncement of the Supreme court should be respected, for us in the Action Alliance and as the National chairman of a political party in this country, with respect to the constitution amendment that is going on, we emphasize that local government autonomy should remain extant and that issues that has to do with allowing the government to function on its own, that is the only way leadership can be felt at the grassroot.

“As a politician we all know that every politics is local no matter where you stay, if truly we respect morality and as a matter of fact we respect the law, this will go a long way to frustrate the activities of people who are causing unnecessary insecurity because by the time the funds that are meant for local governments are channeled properly without the intervention of the state through joint account – in fact the joint account issue should find a way in the constitution to get it distorted – so that at the end of the day, everything that has to do with local government should go directly to them without the intervention of the state.

See also  Inflation, insecurity still major challenges despite reforms – FG

“I can tell you that even from the local government where I come from, when you hear the amount allocated, last month’s allocation was over N400 million and when you get back to the village, you ask yourself where is this money being channeled?

“You find out that it’s still the state government that runs those areas. But then when you talk about getting the dividends of democracy to the grassroot, you can’t shy away from the fact that we need local government administration.

“The best way to anchor this is instead of scrapping local governments we should scrap SIEC, the State Independent Electoral Commission in all the states in Nigeria and let INEC, the only independent body known to conduct election be in charge of local government election, so that when election are being conducted in the states of the Federation, you will find out that when people are properly elected, everybody will mind their business – the state and the federal will mind their business.

“So I’m not in support of the school of thoughts that talks about the scrapping of local government administration in Nigeria.”

Scrapping local governments not in Nigeria’s interest – Lawyer

On his part, activist lawyer, Maduabuchi Idam insisted that the scrapping of local governments is not in the interest of Nigeria.

He said that, “The call to scrap local governments in Nigeria is self-serving and I can tell you it’s only promoted by persons who one way or the other believe that such action will benefit them, it’s not in the interest of Nigeria.

“The provision of section 7 of the constitution is very clear and it was intended to bring government to local authorities which is why it created the local government, because the same section established the local government in Nigeria. Also by the same section it was made autonomous.

“By the virtue of the judgment of the Supreme Court delivered in June 2024 which is the AGF vs the AG of the 36 states in Nigeria, It’s clear that local governments have become autonomous and the idea of scrapping it is self-serving.

See also  Board warns Nigerians against fake paramilitary recruitment messages

“How can you agitate that local governments be replaced with traditional rulers that are appointed by the state?

“Traditional rulers are being given office by the state. If it happens, the idea is that local governments should give way so that the state will perpetually supplant itself on the people direct from the state to local authorities because local governments were intended by the same provisions to bring the government closer to the local authority.”

He added that the clamour should be for local governments elections to be transparent not scrap that tier of government.

He said: “The agitation should be that elections into local government should be transparent, they should be asking for reforms which is what Nigerians are clamouring for proper electoral reforms that would enable candidates to emerge not necessarily from the party that is controlling the state.

“If there is a reform by the electoral act, it will enable chairmen of local government to emerge that would not be under any influence of the state, so the agitation should not be to scrap local governments but it should be to strengthen local government to function as it was intended by the virtue of the constitution.”

Execution of the judgment

The lawyer, however, wondered why the Supreme Court judgment has not been executed.

“I must say that I’m not abreast as to the reason that judgment has not been complied with but I can tell you that the judgment of the Supreme Court is supreme.

“It’s qualified, absolute and commands total compliance and no party, no matter how highly placed is big enough to violate the judgment of the Supreme Court and go scot free,” he added.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  See real reason ex-defence minister, Badaru resigned

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Edo begins gratuity payments for 2012 retirees after 14-year delay

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Inflation, insecurity still major challenges despite reforms – FG

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Remi Tinubu donates ₦110m to families of 22 deceased Kano athletes

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Inflation, insecurity still major challenges despite reforms – FG

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Ivory Coast opposition party calls for rally against election violence

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending