Connect with us

News

Wike saga: Throwback to military impunity

Published

on

TUESDAY’S confrontation in Gaduwa District between the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, and naval officers allegedly acting on the orders of former Navy Chief, Awwal Gambo, again highlights a clear misuse of power long after the end of military rule. Worse, it signals a gross misallocation of critical national resources.

This incident, which centred on an attempt to demolish an unapproved building on a disputed land parcel allegedly linked to Gambo, was aborted by military deployment to protect private interests rather than wider national interests for which the Armed Forces are dedicated.

As the FCT minister sought to enforce a demolition order against a structure without FCT Administration approval, naval officers, claiming superior orders, blocked him and his team.

The encounter quickly escalated into a tense standoff, captured in viral videos showing threats of military violence toward civilian officials, police officers, and DSS security details over a private property the minister insists has no valid approval or allocation papers.

This episode is profoundly incongruous in a democracy. Military discipline, while sacrosanct, must be subject to civilian authority.

This sordid spectacle reflects a troubling waste of military resources. Nigeria grapples with relentless security challenges, including Boko Haram insurgency, banditry, oil theft, and other violent crimes.

Yet, the military is being deployed to guard a contested private construction site within Nigeria’s capital, diverting troops from frontline security duties.

This borderline arrogance and abuse of power by serving and former military commanders, which veils private interests under the guise of uniformed authority, should not be tolerated.

The incident echoes that of January 2022, where police officers drafted from Abuja on the orders of the Inspector-General of Police defied the Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu’s directive to vacate a disputed parcel of land in the Magodo Phase 2 Estate.

See also  PHOTOS: No Casualties As Fire Guts Great Nigeria Insurance House In Lagos

The FCT minister wields significant constitutional powers over land allocation, use, and development within Abuja. The minister’s office is empowered to approve or revoke land rights and ensure compliance with urban planning regulations.

Lere Olayinka, Wike’s media aide, has since claimed that the former CNS was duped into buying land allocated for parks and recreation by a company that had subdivided the plot for onward sale to other buyers, even though its application to convert the land to commercial use was denied in 2022 before Wike came into office.

This and similar land disputes should ideally be resolved through administrative or judicial channels, not military standoffs.

Gambo should have approached the courts for a restraining order against the FCT minister or entered into negotiations instead of resorting to self-help, just because he can influence the military.

However, the altercation exposes shortcomings on Wike’s part. He should have secured a valid court order to carry out the demolition.

His approach appeared impulsive, proceeding with enforcement actions without allowing a reasonable window for amicable dialogue or legal contestation.

While he has demonstrably sanitised the land allocation system in the FCT and enforced payment of land charges by thousands of defaulters, deploying bulldozers should not be the first line of enforcement.

In a democracy, the proper route for resolving disputes is the courts, not forceful demolition, which can result in the breakdown of law and order.

Moreover, the speech and demeanour adopted by Wike during the confrontation have exposed him to public ridicule. His use of uncouth language on the naval officer is indecorous and belittles his office.

See also  Nigerian Egusi seeds return from space

Every Nigerian deserves respect and civil conduct from public officials, despite the tensions at play. In contrast, the naval officer in charge, identified as A.M. Yerima, maintained composure and discipline under provocation.

The former Chief of Army Staff, Tukur Buratai, framed the minister’s behaviour as a national security threat undermining the military chain of command and the authority of the Commander-in-Chief and demanded a public apology from Wike. This line was echoed by Osita Chidoka, former Minister of Aviation.

However, this framing is incorrect and misleading. The main issue is not disrespect or security but an abuse of military power and a dangerous precedent of military interference in civilian land governance.

For democracy to deepen in Nigeria, military authority must be subordinate to civilian rule, but exercised transparently and lawfully. Land governance must follow due process, while arbitrary enforcement actions must be curtailed.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  FG offers HIV patients free liver, kidney tests

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  Nigerian Egusi seeds return from space

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  PHOTOS: No Casualties As Fire Guts Great Nigeria Insurance House In Lagos

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  Court freezes four bank accounts linked to Mele Kyari

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending