Connect with us

News

Benin: ECOWAS fears coup surge, Senate okays Nigerian troops deployment

Published

on

The Senate on Tuesday approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to deploy Nigerian troops to the Republic of Benin as part of a rapid regional peace mission aimed at restoring democratic order after an attempted coup in the neighbouring country.

The Senate’s approval comes as the Economic Community of West African States expressed worry over the security and political challenges eroding democracy in the sub-region during the 55th Session of the Mediation and Security Council at the ministerial level in Abuja on Tuesday.

Benin Republic was thrust into turmoil on Sunday after soldiers operating under the Military Committee for Refoundation seized the state-owned television station in Cotonou and announced the removal of President Patrice Talon.

The mutineers, led by Lt. Col. Pascal Tigri, claimed to have deposed the government, raising urgent security alarms across the sub-region.

Loyalist forces, however, regained control after a brief standoff, aided by the rapid mobilisation of Nigerian troops.

The Presidency described the intervention as proof of President Tinubu’s resolve to safeguard constitutional order in West Africa and prevent another democratic collapse within the ECOWAS region.

The Senate granted Tinubu’s request following the consideration of the President’s letter in the Committee of the Whole, after Senate President Godswill Akpabio read the communication during plenary.

In the letter, Tinubu—who also chairs ECOWAS—urged lawmakers to endorse the deployment to “help restore governance” in Benin, where a faction of soldiers had attempted to topple President Patrice Talon.

But the chamber erupted into a rare open disagreement among senior lawmakers shortly after the Senate assented to the request.

Deputy Senate President and First Deputy Speaker of the ECOWAS Parliament, Senator Jibrin Barau, opened the floor with effusive praise for the President’s swift intervention.

He declared, “Democracy is the best form of government. All ECOWAS members are proud of what the president did. Mr President is a true democrat and showed leadership. We will support and stand by him.”

His remarks, however, immediately drew objections from former Bayelsa State governor, Senator Seriake Dickson, who insisted the matter ought to be debated openly.

“I actually felt there is a need for lawmakers to debate this action,” Dickson protested.

Akpabio promptly shut down the suggestion, insisting the Senate had already given its consent.

“We have given the president consent. Every person was in agreement. All the senators are aware and wouldn’t have given consent if otherwise,” he ruled.

He added that the Senate’s position was unanimous, stressing that Tinubu acted in the interest of national and regional security.

“Whatever the president has done, the Senate is in total agreement. That means he is also protecting the borders of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The president is not going to war.”

See also  Bisi Akande reveals what can end insecurity

Former Edo State governor, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, backed Akpabio’s position and reinforced the argument that the matter had been concluded.

“Mr President, we unanimously consented to it, including Senator Dickson. It is not up for debate. He has acted well and in good faith. The Senate has endorsed and sealed it. Therefore, it cannot be opened.”

Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele also weighed in, providing the legal justification for the Senate’s action.

“The standing order says that in the event of a threat or national security, Mr President can intervene and seek the consent of the Senate within seven days,” he explained.

He thanked senators for acting swiftly. “We believe democracy should not be endangered in Africa.”

Dickson later clarified that he did not oppose the approval but insisted ECOWAS must also address governance deficits that often trigger coups.

“Mr President has done the right thing because democratic institutions are collapsing around us. But it has to be done the right way,” he said.

Dickson added, “We must also warn the leaders of the nations around us to stem the tide and run good governance and popular government in accordance with the constitution they run.”

Senator Jimoh Ibrahim described Nigeria’s intervention as consistent with its long-standing leadership role on the continent.

“Peace is not the opposite of war and war is not the opposite of war… Nigeria is also in line to intervene to save democracy among its close neighbours,” he argued.

He added, “I think this action is quite commendable. President Tinubu is a liberal and democrat.”

Akpabio later expanded the historical context, recalling Nigeria’s roles in Liberia and South Africa.

“Nigeria went into Liberia when it was late. That was why we lost so many soldiers. But we are glad peace was eventually restored. In South Africa, we supported the end of apartheid and brought a lot of South Africans to Nigeria to support our brothers and sisters in Africa.

“But the swiftness of this action is why the Senate gave its consent. I think it is commendable,” he noted.

Addressing the 55th Session of the Mediation and Security Council at the Ministerial level in Abuja on Tuesday, the President of the ECOWAS Commission, Dr Omar Touray, warned about escalating political instability and security threats across the region.

Addressing ministers, diplomats and senior officials, Touray painted a picture of West Africa’s political climate, citing recent developments as evidence of a deteriorating environment.

The commission’s president described ECOWAS as facing an average of high risk across its member states.

“Events of the last few weeks have shown the imperative of serious introspection on the future of our democracy and the urgent need to invest in the security of our community.

See also  Oluwo of Iwo: Nigerians may demand constitutional amendment for Tinubu to exceed two terms

“As you would have seen in the memoranda before you, the country-by-country analyses of our member states show different risk levels across our community, from high to medium, with an average of high risk for our community, thereby demanding immediate and concerted action.

“The risk factors are: the persistence of military interventions (Guinea-Bissau and the Republic of Benin just days ago) and non-compliance with transition norms in Guinea, as we face a military leader turning into a civilian leader;

“Growing erosion of electoral inclusivity across multiple states; expanding influence of terrorists and armed groups and criminal networks threatening regional stability; and increasing geopolitical pressures affecting member states’ diplomacy and cohesion,” he explained.

Among the most concerning developments, he emphasised that “Elections have become a major trigger of instability in our community.”

Several ECOWAS states, such as Guinea, Benin, The Gambia and Cape Verde, are headed into elections in the coming months, raising concerns about electoral tensions and constitutional violations.

Touray also cited recent attempted coups and ongoing negotiations with the Alliance of Sahel States, stressing the urgent need for a united regional response to terrorism and cross-border criminal networks.

Declaring the situation unprecedented, Touray warned, “Faced with this situation, Excellencies, it is safe to declare that our community is in a state of emergency.”

He urged that sessions of the Mediation and Security Council be convened more frequently over the next year, insisting that ECOWAS must “pool our resources to confront the threats of terrorism and banditry, which operate without respect for territorial boundaries.”

He outlined key priorities requiring constant ministerial oversight, including managing the crisis in Guinea-Bissau, ensuring peaceful transitions, addressing growing political exclusion and protecting regional unity amid external pressures.

The ECOWAS commission president also highlighted worsening humanitarian conditions across West Africa, referencing recent UNHCR data. He noted that “as of October 2025, approximately 7.6 million individuals are forcibly displaced across the region,” including over 6.5 million internally displaced persons.

Still referring to the data, the largest displaced populations are found in Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali, while countries such as Niger, Mali, Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire and Togo host the highest numbers of asylum seekers.

Touray stressed, “We must therefore take decisions and actions that will reverse this trend.”

Despite the daunting challenges, Touray pledged ECOWAS’s continued commitment to the region’s citizens.

“Let me assure our community citizens that we will not rest on our oars. We will continue to work harder to promote a peaceful, stable and stronger region for the overall benefit of community citizens,” he noted.

See also  Reps probe tax law tweaks, PDP demands suspension

He called on member states to uphold constitutional norms and maintain unity: “Let us all remain committed to preserving regional unity, advancing peace and upholding the community’s constitutional convergence principles.”

He praised President Bola Tinubu for his prompt military response in the Benin Republic following the failed coup attempt.

Concluding his address, he welcomed new ministerial representatives attending for the first time.

“May I extend a warm welcome to the new Ministers of Defence of Nigeria, Rtd. General Christopher Musa, and Foreign Affairs of Cabo Verde, José Luis Livramento, who are joining today for the first time,” he concluded.

In his remarks, Sierra Leone’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and Chair of the Council of Ministers, Timothy Kabba, urged West African leaders to take decisive action to protect democratic governance in the region amid recent political instability.

Kabba highlighted the fragility of democracy in West Africa, pointing to recent political crises in Guinea-Bissau and Benin.

“The recent coup in Guinea-Bissau and the attempted coup in the Benin Republic are sobering reminders of the fragility of our democratic gains,” Kabba said.

He detailed Sierra Leone’s diplomatic efforts, noting that he and a high-level delegation visited Guinea-Bissau on December 1, 2025, to engage with the military leadership and political stakeholders.

“His Excellency’s engagement helped ease tensions and opened the door for continued dialogue under ECOWAS’s guidance.

“These actions reflect our collective position. ECOWAS cannot and will not accept this development. They undermine everything our community stands for, and they threaten the peace and security of our citizens,” he explained.

The minister stressed the urgent need for practical outcomes from the summit.

“The discussions we have today must move beyond just reaffirming principles. They must generate decisions that offer real hope and strengthen the credibility of our institutions.

“Our people no longer have patience for commitments that remain unpaid. They expect us to confront these challenges with seriousness, unity and purpose,” Kabba said.

The meeting of the Mediation and Security Council precedes the gathering of ECOWAS Heads of State and Government, who are expected to deliberate on the Council’s recommendations amid mounting pressure to restore stability in a deeply troubled region.

West Africa is facing escalating political instability and security challenges, with several ECOWAS member states experiencing coups, attempted coups and fragile political transitions.

Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso remain under military rule, while Guinea-Bissau recently joined this group following a military intervention. On Sunday, an attempted coup in the Benin Republic was foiled, further highlighting the fragility of democratic governance across the region

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Reps probe tax law tweaks, PDP demands suspension

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  Oluwo of Iwo: Nigerians may demand constitutional amendment for Tinubu to exceed two terms

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  Guard democracy, curb misinformation, Tinubu urges editors

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Guard democracy, curb misinformation, Tinubu urges editors

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  U.S. lawmaker Riley Moore insists China cannot dictate America’s policy on Nigeria

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  Customs intercept N48.5m cannabis, seize N220m contraband in Kaduna

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Nigerian passport climbs global ranking, slips in visa-free access

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  FCT infrastructure boom reflects Tinubu’s vision for Abuja – Wike

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending