Connect with us

News

Sylva, five others arraigned, officers’ wives seek justice over alleged coup plot

Published

on

The Federal Government will on Wednesday (today) arraign six individuals, including two retired senior military officers and a serving police inspector, before the Federal High Court in Abuja over an alleged coup plot to wage war against Nigeria and overthrow the President.

The defendants — retired Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired Naval Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor, Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Kashim Goni and Abdulkadir Sani — are billed to appear before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik.

Also named in the charge but said to be at large is former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva.

The defendants are facing 13 counts bordering on conspiracy, attempt to commit treason, terrorism, failure to disclose security intelligence, financing terrorism and money laundering.

The charge, filed on Monday by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and signed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), accused them of offences ranging from alleged attempts to overthrow the government to terrorism-related financing.

According to the prosecution, the defendants allegedly conspired in 2025 “to levy war against the state to overpower the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

They are also accused of failing to report alleged knowledge of a planned treasonable act involving one Colonel Mohammed Alhassan Ma’aji and others.

The government further alleged that the defendants “knowing that a treasonable act was intended to be committed, did not give information thereof with all reasonable despatch to either the President… or a Peace Officer.”

They were also accused of failing to prevent the alleged offence, stating that they “did not use any reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence.”

Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim and Zekeri Umoru were also accused of attending meetings allegedly linked to the plot “in a bid to further a political ideology which may seriously destabilise the constitutional structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

The charge further alleged that the defendants “knowingly and indirectly, rendered support” for acts of terrorism and also failed to disclose critical intelligence to security agencies.

Abdulkadir Sani was accused of receiving N2m on September 23, 2025, while Bukar Kashim Goni allegedly retained N50m from accounts linked to A & A Express Link Concept.

Zekeri Umoru was also accused of receiving N10m cash from Colonel Ma’aji and retaining N8.8m in his account, while Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim allegedly received N1m from the same source.

The offences, according to the charge, contravene Sections 37(2), 40(b), 26(1), 2(3)(d), 12(a), 13(1)(a), and 16(1)(a)(b) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, as well as provisions of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

Alleged coup probe

The development comes amid widening investigations into an alleged coup plot that has already led to arrests within the military and security circles.

In October 2025, the Federal Government cancelled the Independence Day parade, a move later linked in reports to the alleged plot.

The Defence Headquarters, however, dismissed any connection.

Weeks later, authorities confirmed the arrest of 16 military officers, while two others were declared wanted.

In January 2026, the Defence Headquarters confirmed that an internal investigation had established a plan to overthrow President Bola Tinubu, adding that suspects would face military disciplinary panels.

Families of detained officers have since staged protests and demanded transparency, access to their relatives, and speedy trial.

Court martial

Meanwhile, The PUNCH gathered that the military has set up a court martial to try serving personnel allegedly implicated in the case.

The serving military personnel reportedly detained are Brig Gen M. A. Sadiq, Col M. A. Maaji, Lt Col S. Bappah, Lt Col A. A. Hayatu, Lt Col P. Dangnap, Lt Col M. Almakura, Maj A. J. Ibrahim, Maj M. M. Jiddah, Maj M. A. Usman, Maj D. Yusuf, Capt I. Bello, Capt A. A. Yusuf, Lt S. S. Felix, Lt Cdr D. B. Abdullahi, Sqn Ldr S. B. Adamu and Maj I. Dauda.

Reliable sources confirmed that the panel will be constituted today to begin proceedings.

It was also gathered that detained officers have, for the first time since their arrest, been granted access to their lawyers.

Wives demand clarity, fairness

One of the campaigners for the detained officers’ families, Nana Usman, said there was confusion over who was being arraigned in court and who would face military trial.

Nana is wife to one of the detained senior officers, Lt. Col Sadiq Mohammed.

She said, “Our husbands are not among those being taken to the Federal High Court tomorrow (today). Those are retired military men and top police officers from what we heard.

See also  Eid al-Fitr: IG orders deployment of policemen to prayer grounds, recreation centres

“We heard our spouses will face a court-martial from tomorrow (today). I may not be able to say much until we see how proceedings go. That’s also partly because there is no official communication from the military.

“We were only to bring their lawyers to see them today (Tuesday) and prepare ahead for the trial. But whatever it is, we just hope the judgment will be fair. I am also surprised to see them grant the lawyers access to finally see them seven months after their arrest.

“Remember when we (serving officers wives) granted an interview with The PUNCH, we told you specifically that members of their families and the lawyers were denied access to see them.

“Although allowing them access to their lawyers is a good development, we are just hoping they will be fair in their judgment.”

Wives and relatives of detained officers have continued protests, demanding fair trial and access to their loved ones, insisting that they have been held without clear communication for months.

They maintain that their demand is for justice and transparency, not interference in judicial processes.

Recently, children of some of the detained officers staged a peaceful protest at the National Assembly, calling for a speedy trial and the release of their fathers. The young demonstrators held placards with inscriptions such as “Don’t Kill Our Daddies,” “Detention Without Trial is Injustice,” and “Six Months of Torture: Enough Is Enough.”

“I find this whole coup allegation very surprising. I still don’t believe that my husband can be explained into even doing what he is being accused of. He’s someone who really holds his family values very dearly. He does not want anything that would dent his reputation or his family values,” Lt Col M. A. Al-Makura’s wife Shafa’atu Ali Agbo, said.

Possible death penalty – SANs

Senior lawyers have weighed in on the possible consequences facing the defendants if convicted.

Mike Ahamba (SAN) said treason-related offences attracted the most severe punishments under the Nigerian law.

“Every treasonable trial case could carry a death sentence or life imprisonment or long term imprisonment, depending on the facts of this case. If it’s treason, it’s a very serious offense in any country, and that’s exactly what they are facing.

“It depends on what they are charged with and what evidence they have against them. Those who heard and did not report may not get the same sentence as those who participated in planning the coup. They are all offenses.

So let us listen to the evidence they have against them, that’s what’s important,” he stated.

Bankole Akomolafe (SAN) also shared his view.

“It is a death sentence (if found guilty) even though the judge may exercise his power to commute it to a life sentence. But generally, treason attracts death sentence,” he said.

He explained that the judge may decide to issue a lesser sentence on defendants who only committed borderline offenses, adding however that under the criminal code, the death sentence had not been abrogated for those with more severe offenses.

“If you look at our criminal code since they are going to try them at the Federal High Court, if anybody is able to prove that his own is a borderline, not fully involved, the judge may apply discretion to give them lesser sentence – long term imprisonment like 20, 15, 10 years and so on.

“But those that will be found directly culpable and all that, it doesn’t matter that they are under a civilian regime, death sentence has not been abrogated from our law, even though the Judges are skeptical and the state governors too. But it is still part of our law. The maximum sentence is death,” Akomolafe stated.

Other senior lawyers, including Sam Erugo (SAN), Olu Daramola (SAN) and Aare Isiaka Olagunju (SAN), also said the accused could face death penalty if convicted of treason, though appellate rights remain intact.

Erugo stressed that conviction would depend on whether treason or a lesser offence is proven, while Daramola noted that punishment would vary based on established charges.

Olagunju added that treason remains a capital offence under Nigerian law.

“If they are found guilty, they will be sentenced to death if the charge is treason. That is the oldest provision in our criminal law, dating back to the pre-independence era and retained in the Criminal Code Act,” he said.

According to him, defendants in such serious criminal cases retain the right of appeal up to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, which must be exhausted before any sentence can be carried out.

See also  Akpabio links terror attacks to plot against Tinubu, see how

“It will not be like a military process. This is a regular court. They will go through the Court of Appeal and up to the Supreme Court,” he said.

He added that the determination of punishment ultimately depends on the exact legal charge proven in court, particularly whether the prosecution secures a conviction for treason rather than a lesser related offence.

Similarly, Olu Daramola, SAN, said that the fate of individuals accused of plotting to overthrow the government will depend on the specific offence established against them under Nigerian law.

Speaking in a telephone interview ahead of the suspects’ planned arraignment, Daramola explained that while treason-related offences are treated with utmost seriousness, the applicable punishment varies depending on the nature of the charge.

“They are going to be arraigned tomorrow. If the prosecution succeeds and they are convicted, whether they will be sentenced to death or life imprisonment depends on the offence proved,” he said.

“The kind of treason where people are plotting to overthrow the government can actually attract a death sentence,” he added.

However, the senior lawyer expressed uncertainty over whether the current legal framework differs significantly from the military-era decrees under which past coup plotters were tried.

Also the Chairman of Egbe Amofin Oodua, Aare Isiaka Olagunju (SAN), said that if the defendants are found guilty of plotting a coup in Nigeria they may face the death penalty, in line with existing criminal laws.

Olagunju, said the law is clear on the punishment for treason, noting that where the prosecution successfully proves such a charge, the court is empowered to impose the maximum penalty.

“The law provides for death sentence in cases of treason. Where such an offence is established before the court, the punishment is clearly spelt out,” he said.

The senior lawyer further noted that while the law prescribes strict penalties, any accused person would still be entitled to a fair hearing and the full benefit of the judicial process.

CHARGES AGAINST DEFENDANTS

COUNT 1

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, TIMPRE SYLVA (still at large) and others, sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired with one another to levy war against the state to overawe the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code Cap C38 LFN 2004.

COUNT 2

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM ONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large) and others, sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this hourable Court, knowing that COLONEL MOHAMMED ALHASSAN MA’AJI (N/10668) and others intended to commit treason, did not give he information thereof with all reasonable despatch to either the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, or a Peace Officer and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 40(b) of the Criminal Code Cap C38 LFN 2004.

COUNT 3

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large) and others, sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, knowing that COLONEL MOHAMMED ALHASSAN MA‘AJI (N/10668), and others intended to commit treason, did not use any reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 40(b) of the Criminal Code Cap C 38 (LFN) 2004.

COUNT 4

“That you MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large) and others, sometime in the year 2025 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired with one another to commit an act of terrorism in the Federal Republic of Nigeria and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 26(1) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

COUNT 5

“That you, INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP 776373) AND ZEKERI UMORU, sometime in the year 2025 in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, in a bid to further a political ideology which may seriously destabilize the constitutional structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, knowingly participated in meetings connected with an act of terrorism and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Sections 2(3)(d) and 12(a) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

See also  Natasha broke penal code in attacks on Akpabio, Bello –AGF

COUNT 6

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP 776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, AND TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large), sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court knowingly and indirectly, rendered support to COLONEL MOHAMMED ALHASSAN MA‘AJI (N/10668) and others, to commit an act of terrorism, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 13(1) (a) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

COUNT 7

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP 776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, AND TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large), sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court had information which you knew would be of material assistance in pventing the commission of the act of terrorism by COLONEL OHAMMED ALHASSAN MA’AJI (N/10668), and others, failed to lose the information to the relevant agency as soon as practicable, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 6(1)(a) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

COUNT 8

“That you, MAJOR GENERAL MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANA -(RTD), CAPTAIN (NN) ERASMUS OCHEGOBIA VICTOR -(RTD), INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM(AP 776373), ZEKERI UMORU, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, ABDULKADIR SANI, AND TIMPRE SYLVA(still at large), sometime in the year 2025, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court had information which you knew would be of material assistance to securing the apprehension of COLONEL MOHAMMED ALHASSAN MA’AJI (N/10668), and others for an offence of terrorism, failed to disclose the information to the relevant agency as soon as practicable, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 16(1){b) of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

COUNT 9

“That you, ABDULKADIR SANI, on or about the 23% day of September,2025, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, indirectly retained the sum of N2,000,000.00(Two Million Naira) only in your Jaiz Bank Account Number 0005620270 from A & A Express Link Concept, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act to wit: terrorism financing, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(d) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act,2022 and punishable under Section 18 (3) of the same Act.

COUNT 10

“That you, BUKAR KASHIM GONI, in September,2025, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, indirectly retained the aggregate sum of N50,000,000.00( Fifty Million Naira) only in your First Bank Account Number 3021511166 from A & A Express Link Concept, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act to wit: terrorism financing, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(d) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act,2022 and punishable under Section 18 (3) of the same Act.

COUNT 11

“That you, ZEKERI UMORU, in September,2025, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, without going through a financial institution accepted a cash payment of the sum of N10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Naira) only from Colonel Mohammed Alhassan Maa‘aji and thereby committed an offence contrary to Sections 2(1)(a) and 19(1)(d) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act,2022 and punishable under Section 19(2)(b) of the same Act.

COUNT 12

“That you, ZEKERI UMORU, in September,2025, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, indirectly retained the aggregate sum of N8,800,000.00(Eight Million, Eight Hundred Thousand Naira) only in your Zenith Bank Plc Account Number 2006041878, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act to wit: terrorism financing, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(d) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act,2022 and punishable under Section 18 (3) of the same Act.

COUNT 13

“That you, INSPECTOR AHMED IBRAHIM, in September, 2025, in Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, directly took possession of the sum of N1,000,000.00(One Million Naira) only from COLONEL MOHAMMED ALHASSAN MA’AJI (N/ 10668), which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act to wit: terrorism financing, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section | (2)(d) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act,2022 and punishable under Section 18 (3) of the same Act.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Suicide bill: Akpabio defends remarks as psychiatrists demand apology

Published

on

Senate President Godswill Akpabio has defended his remarks on the proposed suicide bill, insisting on his position amid growing criticism from psychiatrists, who have demanded an apology.

The psychiatrists faulted Akpabio’s comments, warning that they could reinforce stigma against people experiencing suicidal thoughts and discourage those struggling with mental health challenges from seeking professional help.

Akpabio was quoted as saying during the Senate debate on October 13, 2026, that, “If you attempt it [suicide], you better succeed. If you don’t succeed, we will send you to prison.”

However, the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, in a statement signed by its President, Dr Veronica Nyamali, and Secretary, Prof Mayowa Okonoda, said its statement was prompted by reports that the Senate was considering a bill by Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong seeking to establish a framework for suicide prevention, decriminalise attempted suicide, and provide support for survivors, with Sections 327 and 231 of Nigeria’s Criminal Code and Penal Code, respectively, identified as provisions currently used to criminalise attempted suicide.

The association maintained that a person who survived a suicide attempt should be regarded first and foremost as an individual experiencing severe psychological distress, and that the appropriate response was urgent medical care, compassionate assessment, treatment, safety planning, and follow-up care, not a threat of imprisonment.

“APN respectfully but firmly rejects the proposition that a person who survives a suicide attempt should be punished for surviving. Public officials have a particular responsibility to communicate in ways that protect life, reduce stigma and encourage people at risk to seek help.

“The association acknowledges that suicide and attempted suicide are serious public health concerns requiring urgent and comprehensive intervention.

“However, a person who survives a suicide attempt should be regarded first and foremost as an individual experiencing severe psychological distress.

“The appropriate response is urgent medical care, compassionate assessment, treatment, safety planning and follow-up—not a threat of imprisonment,” the association said.

Continuing, the APN warned that threatening imprisonment for surviving a suicide attempt could deter people from seeking help, discourage families from disclosing attempts, delay access to emergency medical and psychiatric care, and intensify the stigma that already made help-seeking difficult in Nigeria, all of which would undermine rather than strengthen suicide prevention.

“The APN respectfully calls upon the National Assembly to give careful consideration to the evidence and international public-health guidance concerning the criminalisation of attempted suicide and to engage mental health professionals, people with lived experience, human-rights experts and other stakeholders in the legislative process,” the statement noted.

See also  FIDA rescues two-week-old baby abandoned in Rivers shrine by grandfather

The association called on the National Assembly to enact legislation removing criminal penalties for attempted suicide and called on the Senate President to retract and apologise for the reported statement.

It added, “The National Assembly should enact legislation that removes criminal penalties for attempted suicide and establishes a clear, funded framework for prevention, care, rehabilitation and continuing support.

“The Senate President and all public office holders should use language that protects life, avoids stigma and encourages people in distress to seek help; APN calls for a clarification or retraction of the reported statement by the Senate President and an apology to Nigerians.”

The APN said public officials had a particular responsibility to use language that protected lives, reduced stigma and encouraged people at risk to seek help.

The association cited a landmark 2008 study by Omigbodun, Dogra, Esan and Adeodun, which studied 1,429 adolescents aged 10 to 17 years attending secondary schools in south-west Nigeria and found that more than one in five reported suicidal ideation, with approximately 12 per cent reporting a suicide attempt in the preceding year.

It said the study associated suicidal behaviour in adolescents with sexual abuse, exposure to physical violence, hunger, parental divorce, and living in a polygamous family, and that the authors had called on Nigerian policymakers and health providers to address the problem urgently.

The APN also cited global data showing that suicide was responsible for approximately 727,000 deaths worldwide in 2021 and remained among the leading causes of death for young people.

It said the World Health Organisation’s 2023 Policy Brief on the Health Aspects of Decriminalisation of Suicide and Suicide Attempts recommended that countries identify and repeal legislation and policies that criminalised suicide and suicide attempts, noting that decriminalisation was not the same as endorsing suicide but was intended to reduce barriers to help-seeking and enable a person in crisis to receive care rather than punishment.

The association further said children and adolescents required particular protection because their mental health and coping skills were still developing.

The statement said, “A child or young person who survives an attempt should be supported and assessed, with safeguarding measures where abuse, exploitation or other risks are suspected.”

Among its specific recommendations, the association called on the National Assembly to enact legislation establishing a clear, funded framework for prevention, care, rehabilitation, and continuing support for survivors.

See also  PHOTOS: Colombian Vice President Arrives Nigeria For 3-Day Official Visit

It also called on federal and state authorities to strengthen access to mental health care in primary care, emergency departments, schools, and communities; and on families, schools, faith leaders, community organisations, the media, and civil society to be supported to recognise warning signs, respond without blame, and connect people at risk with professional help.

Speaking on the development, Akpabio warned Nigerians against taking lawmakers’ contributions during plenary out of context, insisting that individual opinions expressed during debates should not be mistaken for the Senate’s final position.

His response followed public reactions to his opposition to a bill seeking to decriminalise attempted suicide and replace imprisonment with medical treatment, rehabilitation and psychological support.

The bill, sponsored by Ekpenyong, scaled second reading during Tuesday’s plenary, triggering debate over whether survivors of suicide attempts should be prosecuted or treated as people requiring medical and mental health intervention.

Akpabio had opposed the proposed decriminalisation, insisting that attempted suicide should remain a criminal offence, a position that drew attention and criticism following his remarks that survivors should be jailed.

Addressing the issue during Thursday’s plenary, the Senate President said legislative debates were characterised by opposing views, adding that public commentators should wait for the chamber’s final decisions before concluding.

“When we discuss here, we discuss for and against, and in the course of our discussions, whatever we say should not anger anybody outside this chamber, because at the end, what matters is our final decision,” he said.

He added that lawmakers must be allowed to disagree during deliberations without their contributions being misrepresented or used to damage their reputations.

“We want to make the best laws, so we are bound to oppose each other, and we are also bound to support each other,” he said.

Akpabio specifically cautioned television panellists and other public commentators against interpreting legislative proceedings through political considerations rather than the substance of the issues under consideration.

“No matter the discussion, please consider the final decision of the Senate. Don’t go and sit down in panels and try to do politically motivated discussions,” he added.

The Senate President also addressed the relationship between terrorism and religion, rejecting attempts to associate violent acts with any particular faith.

See also  Eid al-Fitr: IG orders deployment of policemen to prayer grounds, recreation centres

“Terrorists are not Muslims. Terrorists are not Christians. Terrorists are human beings who believe in taking their lives and the lives of others,” he said.

Akpabio maintained that Islam prohibits suicide and killing, arguing that claims about suicide bombers expecting rewards in paradise should not be used to misrepresent the religion.

He further argued that discussions on suicide legislation should distinguish between people experiencing mental health challenges and those who deliberately take their own lives or kill others.

“You have to distinguish between suicide committed by people who are mentally disturbed and suicide intentionally committed by people who are physically sound,” Akpabio said.

He said the Senate’s responsibility was to make laws that addressed societal challenges while taking relevant circumstances into account.

To reinforce his position on religious tolerance, Akpabio cited his record of supporting both Muslim and Christian pilgrims during his tenure as governor, saying he had sponsored 5,800 Muslims to the Holy Land and more than 10,000 Christians to Rome and Jerusalem.

He also referred to his longstanding relationship with Muslim members of his staff, saying he regarded them as family rather than defining them by their religious affiliations.

“My ADC for 19 years is a Muslim. I don’t recognise him as a Muslim. I recognise him as a brother,” he said.

Akpabio added that more than 65 per cent of his staff were Muslims, insisting that he had no reason to speak disparagingly of Islam.

“There’s no way I will talk down on Muslim religion,” he said.

The Suicide Prevention Bill 2026 seeks to address what its sponsor described as inconsistencies in Nigeria’s legal framework, under which the National Mental Health Act recognises attempted suicide as a psychiatric emergency requiring intervention, while provisions of the Criminal Code and Penal Code continue to criminalise the act.

Presenting the bill, Ekpenyong argued that survivors should receive medical assessment, treatment, rehabilitation and follow-up support rather than face imprisonment.

The proposed legislation also seeks to establish crisis helplines, promote public awareness, train police officers, teachers and health workers, and create a national data system to strengthen suicide prevention efforts.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Committees on Judiciary and Health for further legislative action, including a public hearing.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu orders rescue of kidnap victims, safe 2027 polls

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has directed heads of security agencies to rescue all abducted persons and ensure that no terrorist or bandit camp remains anywhere in Nigeria, the Minister of Defence, Gen. Christopher Musa (retd.), said on Thursday.

Musa, who spoke to State House correspondents after a security meeting presided over by the President at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, said Tinubu also asked the service chiefs and other security heads to guarantee a safe environment for Nigerians to vote in the elections scheduled for January.

The minister said the meeting was convened to brief the President on the security situation ahead of the polls, with all heads of security agencies in attendance.

“The directive from the President is: all of us must go all out to fish out and rescue all those that have been abducted, kidnapped, wherever they are.

“There shouldn’t be any camp of any terrorists or bandits anywhere in Nigeria,” he stated.

Musa said Tinubu made it clear that he wanted a free, fair and credible election, and assured political parties that the security forces would not take sides.

Musa stated, “Mr President made it very clear he wants a free, fair and credible election. We must do everything possible to ensure that the country is safe and secure for the citizens to go out and vote.

“We are going to ensure that we give everybody the opportunity to go and serve, so they have nothing to worry about, nothing to be afraid of, and nobody is going to intimidate them for whatever reasons.”

He added that it was “important for all other political parties to understand that the security forces are going to be neutral.”

The minister rejected suggestions that underage persons were being recruited into the armed forces, saying the concern related to the use of children by terrorists.

According to Musa, “There is nobody that is underage that is being brought here. I think the discussion that was made was that the accusation was on the terrorists using underage.

“We know that we don’t have control over what they do, and that’s why we need to understand that we must not allow them to remain wherever they are.”

On efforts to boost the capacity of the security forces, Musa cited increased recruitment, training and procurement.

See also  Natasha broke penal code in attacks on Akpabio, Bello –AGF

He said Tinubu would soon inaugurate about 10 newly acquired aircraft and helicopters.

“Mr President is coming to commission a set of new aircraft and helicopters that have been bought.

“I think almost about 10 of them in number, and to show Nigerians that despite the economic issue, the issue of security is on the front burner of Mr President’s view,” he announced.

He pointed to the recent salary increase for members of the armed forces and said improvements for the police, other agencies and pensioners were being addressed.

“Nobody is going to be left behind,” he said.

On August 4, Tinubu approved salary increases of between 30 and 80 per cent for about 250,000 armed forces personnel, effective September 1.

Privates to staff sergeants got the highest rise, at 80 per cent, while officers above the rank of colonel got 30 per cent. The yearly salary bill rose from N660bn to N924bn.

In October 2025, the Defence Ministry said 24 aircraft, including 10 AW109 Trekker attack helicopters and M-346 fighter jets, were being built for Nigeria by Leonardo in Italy, for delivery in four batches.

The minister urged Nigerians to support the security agencies, including by reporting wrongdoing by security personnel.

He argued, “Security is everybody’s responsibility. It’s not only for members of security forces. Everyone has a role to play.

“Whatever you see that is going wrong, even with our members that are not doing what is right, please don’t hesitate to report. Action will be taken.”

The meeting was attended by the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu; the Minister of Police Affairs, Ibrahim Gaidam; the Minister of State for Defence, Bello Matawalle; and the Special Adviser to the President on Homeland Security, Maj Gen Adeyinka Famadewa (retd.).

Others present were the Chief of Army Staff, Lt Gen Waidi Shaibu; the Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Adm Idi Abbas; the Chief of Air Staff, Air Marshal Sunday Aneke; the Chief of Defence Intelligence, Lt Gen Emmanuel Undiandeye; the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu; the Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, Mohammed Mohammed; and the Director-General of the Department of State Services, Adeola Ajayi.

Thursday’s meeting comes 90 days before Nigerians head into the January 2027 general elections, with the presidential poll scheduled for January 16.

See also  Akwa Ibom doctors threaten N1bn lawsuit against EFCC over hospital raid

Impeccable sources familiar with the discussions held at the meeting told our correspondent that the President ordered the deployment of forest guards in all reclaimed territories from terrorists and bandits, to prevent them from reoccupying areas from where the military had dislodged them.

The sources also said the council discussed the designation of power facilities as critical national assets, following repeated vandalism, and that the President asked for a review of possible restrictions to stem the risk of Ebola entering Nigeria.

One of the sources said the military, by the nature of its operations, clears areas and moves on, often leaving retaken swaths of land open for reoccupation by terrorists.

“The President has directed that we deploy forest guards to hold the grounds that the military has taken. The military does not hold ground. They simply clear the place and move.

“When the military clears the place, these insurgents, they run. And once we take it, we can’t stay there, so they come back.

“The plan now is to deploy forest guards to hold some of these territories,” one high-ranking official stated.

However, the official did not say how many guards would be deployed, in which states, or when.

The Presidential Forest Guards Initiative, coordinated by the Office of the National Security Adviser, was launched in May 2025.

It was conceived in February 2024 after a meeting with state governors, who were asked to recruit between 2,000 and 5,000 guards each.

On December 10, 2025, Tinubu directed the NSA, Nuhu Ribadu, to begin the “immediate training, arming, and deployment of additional forest guards nationwide.”

The President said, “We need all the forces we can utilise.”

On December 27, 2025, more than 7,000 guards graduated after three months of training and were deployed in seven states including Borno, Sokoto, Yobe, Adamawa, Niger, Kwara and Kebbi.

Ribadu described them as a “force multiplier” and said they would “identify hot spots” in forests.

He stated that the Department of State Services and the National Park Service will handle operational coordination.

After the May 15, 2026 abduction of pupils and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State, the Federal Government said Tinubu had approved the recruitment of 1,000 more guards for the state.

See also  Collapsed building: Three dead, 12 rescued as Ogun begins probe

In August, the programme grew to 10 states, with over 2,000 more trained in Kaduna, Edo and Kogi, reportedly bringing the total to about 9,000.

On February 19, 2016, the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen Olufemi Oluyede, inaugurated Operation Savannah Shield in Kwara, vowing that forests and ungoverned spaces “will no longer serve as safe havens” for terrorists.

Another official familiar with Thursday’s deliberations said the council discussed attacks on electricity infrastructure.

“Because of the problems of vandalism of power facilities, we are already working to designate it as a critical national asset. It was brought up at the meeting to be designated.

“It has to be designated before we can now take appropriate action on it,” the official said.

On June 24, 2024, Tinubu signed the Critical National Information Infrastructure Order, which listed power generation and distribution among 13 sectors and tasked the NSA with protecting them.

In October 2024, vandalism of the Shiroro–Kaduna line plunged about 17 northern states into darkness.

Tinubu at the time said the government would no longer tolerate sabotage of public utilities and ordered security cover for repair crews.

A third source said the council also reviewed the Ebola outbreak in Central Africa, which he said was rising.

According to the official, “We looked into this Ebola crisis. We have to look at it because it’s rising. Beyond what we’re doing now, the President said we have to look at it and see whatever restrictions we might need to make to safeguard Nigerians. We cannot afford to fold our arms.”

When pressed for specific measures to be taken by the Federal Government, the official declined to speak.

The recent Bundibugyo strain outbreak was first reported in the Democratic Republic of Congo on May 15, 2026.

The World Health Organisation declared a public health emergency of international concern.

The DRC said it recorded 9,066 confirmed cases and 4,381 deaths, according to the DRC, making it the world’s second-deadliest Ebola outbreak.

On October 6, Kenya confirmed an imported fatal case on October 6.

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention said that, as of that day, Nigeria had no confirmed case.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Five Assemblies say yes, 31 yet to decide on state police bill, read details

Published

on

The proposed constitutional amendment to establish State Police has suffered a setback, with only five of the 36 State Houses of Assembly having approved the bill as of Thursday, October 15, despite a 30-day deadline set by the National Assembly for the state legislatures to communicate their positions.

The Assemblies of Edo, Osun, Oyo, Rivers and Zamfara have passed the proposed amendment, which seeks to decentralise Nigeria’s policing system and provides a constitutional framework for the establishment and operation of state police services.

However, several other state legislatures are still studying the bill, consulting stakeholders or waiting to begin deliberations, leaving the proposed reform far short of the constitutional requirement for approval by at least 24 state Houses of Assembly.

The bill was transmitted to the state legislatures on September 16, 2026, following its passage by the Senate on June 24 and the House of Representatives on July 23. The 30-day period given to the Assemblies was due to expire on October 16 (today).

Despite the deadline, the leadership of the House of Representatives has yet to make a formal statement on the status of the exercise or explain the next steps following the limited number of approvals.

The development raises questions about the pace of the constitutional amendment process, which requires broad support from state legislatures before the proposed changes can take effect.

Section 9(2) of the 1999 Constitution requires a constitutional alteration to be approved by resolutions of at least two-thirds of all state Houses of Assembly, representing 24 of the 36 states, before it can be presented for presidential assent.

With only five states having approved the proposal, the bill remains a considerable distance from the required threshold.

The establishment of state police has featured prominently in Nigeria’s security debate amid persistent challenges involving banditry, kidnapping, terrorism, communal violence and other criminal activities.

However, supporters argue that decentralised policing would enable states to respond more effectively to local security threats, while concerns have been raised over the possible political misuse of state-controlled security agencies.

The proposed amendment provides for a Federal Police Service alongside state police services, with each state empowered to establish its own service through legislation. It also outlines arrangements for the administration, oversight and accountability of state police personnel.

States back Bill

Zamfara State House of Assembly confirmed passing the bill, joining the legislatures of Osun, Oyo, Rivers and Edo in supporting the proposed constitutional amendment.

The spokesperson for the Zamfara Assembly, Malam Nasiru Biya-Buki, told The PUNCH that the House had completed the process and forwarded the bill to the National Assembly.

“The Zamfara State House of Assembly has since passed the bill regarding the creation of the state police,” he said.

“The bill has been sent to the National Assembly, Abuja, as requested. So, we are waiting for the next line of action to take.”

The Speaker of the Osun State House of Assembly, Adewale Egbedun, similarly, read a letter from the National Assembly requesting state legislatures to consider and approve the proposed constitutional alteration.

During deliberations, lawmakers, including Lawrence Adeoti, representing Ife South State Constituency, and Taofeek Olayiwola, representing Ede South, supported the proposal, arguing that state police would improve security across the country.

Adewumi Adeyemi, representing Obokun State Constituency, and Jeremiah Awoyeye, representing Ife Central, also described the proposal as timely.

They argued that the establishment of state police would strengthen security at state and local government levels by enabling authorities to respond more effectively to threats within their jurisdictions.

The motion supporting the amendment was moved by the Majority Leader, Babajide Kofoworola, representing Ede North, and seconded by Tajudeen Adeyemi, representing Ifelodun.

In Oyo, the House of Assembly passed the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026 on September 29 after clause-by-clause consideration.

The session was presided over by the Speaker, Adebo Ogundoyin, following the receipt of a letter from the Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, transmitting the bill for consideration and approval.

See also  Eid al-Fitr: IG orders deployment of policemen to prayer grounds, recreation centres

Ogundoyin said the passage of the amendment would have significant legislative implications for the state, particularly the need to enact a comprehensive law to guide the operation of its police service if the constitutional alteration is completed.

He explained that the proposed framework would provide for a Federal Police Service alongside state police services, with each state empowered to establish its own service through legislation.

According to him, state police would be responsible for enforcing state laws, maintaining public safety and order, preventing and detecting offences, protecting lives and property, and performing other local policing functions prescribed by state law.

The proposal also provides for State Police Service Commissions to oversee appointments, promotions, transfers, discipline, complaints and accountability.

A State Commander of Police would head each state service, with the governor appointing the commander on the recommendation of the National Police Council, subject to confirmation by the State House of Assembly.

The framework would also empower the National Assembly to prescribe minimum policing standards for federal and state police services, while allowing states to establish higher or additional standards.

Others undecided

While five states have approved the proposed amendment, several others are yet to take a definitive position, with some still examining the bill and others planning consultations or public hearings before voting.

In Ogun State, the former Speaker of the House of Assembly and Chairman of the House Committee on Constitutional Amendment, Olakunle Oluomo, said the legislature was considering holding a public hearing on the proposed changes.

Oluomo said he had proposed a public hearing to familiarise residents with the contents of the bill and allow them to contribute before the Assembly reached a decision.

“The Speaker is working round the clock to ensure success of everything. As the House Committee Chairman on Constitution Amendment, I have proposed that we should have public hearing about it.

“I look forward to meeting the Speaker this week so that we can fix a date for public hearing about it, so that our people can get familiarised with the content of the bill and then we take it up from there,” he said.

The Speaker, Oludaisi Elemide, also confirmed that the Assembly was still working on the proposal.

In Delta, the House of Assembly received the bill but has yet to announce whether it will support or reject it.

The Chief Press Secretary to the Speaker, Nkem Nwaeke, confirmed this to The PUNCH, saying that the Assembly was following due legislative process.

“I can confirm that the bill has been received by the House and due legislative process is being followed,” he said.

Nwaeke said the Speaker, Emomotimi Guwor, who also chairs the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, would announce the House’s position after consultations with relevant stakeholders.

“The interest of Delta people remains uppermost to the Assembly, hence the need for due diligence,” he added.

However, he did not disclose when the bill would be debated or voted on.

In Abia, the Speaker, Emmanuel Emeruwa, confirmed that the House had received the constitutional amendment proposal and that it had been brought before members.

“We have this on the floor,” Emeruwa said.

Asked whether a public hearing had been scheduled and when the Assembly would vote, the Speaker said, “I don’t have a position yet on the matter.”

In Anambra, the Clerk of the House of Assembly, Tony Ughenu, said the bill had been communicated to lawmakers but had not been formally listed for consideration.

“It has been communicated on the floor that Anambra State House of Assembly is in receipt from the National Assembly a Bill on State Police Constitution Amendment. It was announced two sessions ago,” Ughenu said.

He noted that the Assembly could not alter the provisions of the proposed constitutional amendment but was required to vote in support of or against it.

“The House normally is expected to vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ on it,” he said.

Ughenu attributed part of the delay to ongoing deliberations at the Speakers’ Forum, adding that the position of the Assembly would become clearer in the coming weeks.

In Imo, the Chairman of the House Committee on Information and Judiciary, Dominic Ezerioha, said the bill arrived as lawmakers were proceeding on recess.

See also  Nnamdi Kanu appeals conviction, faults terrorism trial

He said the House was expected to resume on Thursday, expressing hope that the proposal would be listed for consideration.

“The bill came when we were going for recess. But we resumed on Thursday and it was presented,” Ezerioha said.

He explained that lawmakers would examine the provisions and deliberate on their implications before reaching a decision.

Also, the Kaduna State House of Assembly has begun examining the proposed amendment and plans to organise a public hearing before taking a final position.

The Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Henry Marah, said lawmakers were reviewing the provisions to determine how they would apply to the state’s security situation.

“We are still studying the bill. We are looking at the underlying clauses and everything that is peculiar, in particular, to Kaduna State,” Marah said.

He said the Assembly would bring the bill to the floor after completing its review and would subsequently engage members of the public and other stakeholders.

“The public hearing is important because we need to hear from the people and stakeholders. Their contributions will also guide us when we consider the bill further,” he added.

Reps mum

The leadership of the House of Representatives has declined to comment on the status of the state police bill as the deadline for the state legislatures to communicate their decisions elapsed on Thursday.

In a telephone conversation with our correspondent, spokesperson for the House, Akin Rotimi, told our correspondent that not picking his calls was an indication that he was not interested in speaking on the subject matter.

“If you asked me a question and you did not get an answer, it means I don’t want to answer. You cannot be pressurising me like this,” he said, adding, “You know that question is not for me.”

The insistence of our reporter for an official comment notwithstanding, Rotimi stood his ground and subsequently ended the call.

The silence leaves unresolved questions about whether the National Assembly will extend its deadline, issue a fresh directive or take any other step to advance the constitutional amendment process.

Senate pledges passage

However, the Senate was more accommodating as it assured Nigerians that the proposed establishment of state police would be completed before the tenure of the 10th National Assembly elapsed, despite delays in securing the approval of state legislatures for the constitutional amendment.

The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Senator Yemi Adaramodu, gave the assurance in an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, dismissing fears that the process could be prolonged until the inauguration of the 11th National Assembly.

Despite the slow pace of approvals, Adaramodu said the Senate was not under pressure, noting that the constitutional amendment required the consent of at least 24 state Houses of Assembly, representing two-thirds of the 36 states.

He said, “We are still waiting after transmitting to the states. We only need 24 State Houses of Assembly to consent. That’s two-thirds of 36. So, once we get that, we will go ahead and promulgate.”

The senator also allayed fears that the constitutional amendment could be delayed until the 11th National Assembly, insisting that the current 10th Senate would complete the process before the next legislature takes over before the end of July 2027.

“There is no need for fear. This is the 10th Senate, isn’t it? I can assure you that it will be done in the life of this 10th Senate before the next one comes on board,” he assured.

Asked whether the National Assembly had set another deadline for the state legislatures to approve or reject the bill, Adaramodu said the federal lawmakers expected their responses soon.

See also  Collapsed building: Three dead, 12 rescued as Ogun begins probe

The proposed amendment comes amid persistent security challenges and growing calls for the decentralisation of policing, with proponents arguing that state-controlled police formations would enable authorities to respond more effectively to local security threats.

The National Assembly had, on September 16, 2026, transmitted the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, titled, “A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to Provide for the Establishment of State Police Services; and for Related Matters,” to the 36 state Houses of Assembly.

The transmission followed widespread demands for a review of the country’s centralised policing structure to address insecurity across the federation.

The Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, subsequently clarified that the State Police Bill was the only constitutional amendment proposal that had so far been transmitted to the state legislatures.

The bill’s prospects ultimately depend on securing approval from at least 24 state Houses of Assembly, as required by the Constitution.

Until that threshold is met and the remaining constitutional procedures are completed, the proposed establishment of state police will remain a proposal rather than an operative constitutional arrangement.

National Policing Bill

Meanwhile, the Presidency said on Thursday that the National Policing Bill, the proposed law to give effect to the planned state police system, is 90 per cent ready and would be transmitted to the National Assembly within two weeks, on October 29.

The Chief of Staff to the President and Chairman of the Presidential Working Group, Femi Gbajabiamila, disclosed this while speaking to State House correspondents after a steering committee meeting at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja.

He said, “The National Policing Bill is more or less ready for transmission to the National Assembly. We will probably have one more meeting after this to cross the t’s and dot the i’s and make sure every area is covered. So, we are 90 per cent ready.

“The governors have one or two observations, and we should be ready in about a week or so.”

Gbajabiamila described the proposal as “the most consequential Bill of the administration so far”.

He said it had gone through intense deliberation in the weeks since the steering committee began work on August 3.

Asked whether states might delay approving the constitution amendment on state police, particularly as only five states had passed it, Gbajabiamila said there was a national consensus among Nigerians on the need for the change.

“I see no reason why anyone will want to have a rethink on it,” he stated.

The meeting was attended by the Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum and Governor of Kwara State, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq; Governors Dapo Abiodun (Ogun) and Uba Sani (Kaduna); and the Inspector-General of Police, Tunji Disu.

The Attorney-General of the Federation was represented by the Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Justice, Beatrice Jedy-Agba.

Other members present included the Chairman of the Policy Advisory Committee, Justice Abdullahi Liman (retd); the Head of the Nigeria Police Reform Secretariat, Prof. Olu Ogunsakin; the Special Adviser to the President on National Assembly Matters (House of Representatives), Lanre Smart; the committee secretary, Nnadubem Moghalu; and a representative of the Nigerian Bar Association president.

President Bola Tinubu inaugurated the seven-member Presidential Working Group on July 7, with Gbajabiamila presiding on his behalf.

It was mandated to produce a “technically robust, implementation-ready draft National Policing Bill.”

Tinubu said the bill would cover minimum policing standards, state readiness certification, federal-state coordination, accountability, human rights safeguards and fiscal conditions.

“The Constitution Amendment Bill establishes the framework for dual policing, but it does not operationalise it,” Tinubu said, according to a speech read on his behalf.

On Wednesday, at the inauguration of the APC Presidential Campaign Council, Tinubu told the gathering that state police “will be a reality.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending