Connect with us

Politics

Tinubu, Atiku, Obi weigh ex-govs for campaign DG roles ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

With barely two weeks to the official commencement of presidential campaigns for the 2027 general election, political parties have intensified behind-the-scenes consultations over the composition of their campaign organisations, with former governors emerging as leading contenders to head the campaign structures of the major presidential candidates.

Investigations by The PUNCH revealed that while the ruling All Progressives Congress is weighing the credentials of former Nasarawa State Governor Tanko Al-Makura and Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma to lead President Bola Tinubu’s re-election campaign, the African Democratic Congress has settled on former Sokoto State Governor, Senator Aminu Tambuwal, as the leading contender to direct former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s presidential bid.

The Labour Party, the New Nigeria Peoples Party, the Social Democratic Party and the National Democratic Coalition have also stepped up consultations over their campaign structures, with officials of the parties confirming that announcements on their campaign directors-general and campaign councils would be made before August 19, the date fixed by the Independent National Electoral Commission for the commencement of presidential campaigns.

The flurry of consultations reflects the strategic importance political parties attach to the office of campaign Director-General, regarded as one of the most influential positions in any presidential race after the candidate and running mate.

Beyond coordinating campaign logistics, the DG is expected to supervise nationwide mobilisation, harmonise the activities of campaign councils across the six geopolitical zones, manage relationships with political stakeholders, oversee fundraising efforts, coordinate media messaging and ensure that the candidate’s manifesto is effectively communicated to voters.

With President Tinubu seeking a second term and opposition parties attempting to build a formidable coalition capable of ending the APC’s dominance at the centre, political observers say the choice of campaign managers could significantly shape the intensity and direction of the contest.

Already, preparations have gathered momentum following INEC’s release of the timetable for the 2027 general election, which provides for presidential campaigns to begin on August 19.

The timetable has effectively shifted political parties from internal consultations and candidate nominations to full campaign mode, with attention now focused on assembling campaign organisations capable of reaching voters across Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.

Although several parties have already unveiled their presidential candidates, many have continued consultations on campaign structures in a bid to strike political, regional and religious balances that could strengthen their electoral prospects.

For the ADC, which recently emerged as the platform of a broad opposition coalition, attention has centred on former Sokoto State governor and serving Senator, Aminu Tambuwal.

Former Vice President and presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar.
File: Former Vice President and presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar.

Party sources familiar with the development disclosed that Tambuwal was poised to be named Director-General of the Atiku Abubakar 2027 Presidential Campaign Organisation, barring any last-minute changes arising from consultations among party leaders.

If confirmed, Tambuwal would reprise the role he played during the 2023 presidential election when he served as Director-General of Atiku Abubakar’s presidential campaign on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party.

Atiku eventually lost the election to President Tinubu of the APC after a keenly contested race that also featured Labour Party candidate Peter Obi and NNPP flag bearer Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso.

Party insiders believe Tambuwal’s familiarity with Atiku’s political structure, coupled with his long-standing relationship with the former vice-president, makes him one of the strongest candidates for the position.

A highly placed source close to Atiku told The PUNCH that the former Speaker of the House of Representatives had emerged as the leading choice to coordinate the campaign machinery for the ADC presidential candidate.

When asked who was being considered for the position, the source, who requested anonymity because the decision had yet to be formally announced, replied simply: “Tambuwal.”

The source further disclosed that Tambuwal would work closely with Atiku’s running mate, former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, in developing and executing the party’s nationwide campaign strategy.

According to the source, “Amaechi will work alongside Tambuwal even though the former Rivers governor is the running mate of the ex-vice president.”

The anticipated appointment underscores the central role both men are expected to play in the ADC’s efforts to present a united opposition front against the ruling APC.

Tambuwal
File: Aminu Tambuwal

While Tambuwal is expected to oversee the campaign structure and political coordination, Amaechi is projected to spearhead nationwide mobilisation alongside the presidential candidate.

Political analysts note that both men bring extensive experience to the table.

Tambuwal has served as Speaker of the House of Representatives, Governor of Sokoto State for two terms and now represents Sokoto South Senatorial District in the Senate.

Throughout his political career, he has remained one of the country’s most influential power brokers, maintaining close relationships across party lines and playing major roles in coalition-building ahead of successive general elections.

He was among the prominent northern politicians who supported Atiku’s presidential ambitions within the PDP before both men eventually left the party for the ADC amid disagreements over the party’s leadership and direction.

Tambuwal formally joined the ADC in March 2026 after resigning from the PDP, where he had remained one of the party’s leading figures for many years.

Shortly after his defection, he announced that he would not seek another term in the Senate.

Explaining the decision at the time, the former governor said stepping aside would help promote unity within the party and create opportunities for younger politicians to assume leadership responsibilities.

His previous experience in managing Atiku’s 2023 campaign is also seen as a major advantage, especially as the opposition seeks to avoid organisational lapses that affected previous electoral outings.

Meanwhile, a chieftain of the ADC and former Deputy National Youth Leader of the Peoples Democratic Party, Timothy Osadolor, confirmed that consultations on the composition of the presidential campaign structure were ongoing.

See also  APC waives screening for Tinubu ahead of primaries

Speaking with The PUNCH, Osadolor said the party leadership would meet on Wednesday, with a final decision on the campaign Director-General expected after the meeting.

“They have not agreed on a name yet but they are to meet this Wednesday,” he said, adding that “some names have been suggested.”

His remarks suggest that although Tambuwal has emerged as the frontrunner, the party leadership is still following internal procedures before making an official announcement.

The consultations also reflect the balancing act within the opposition coalition as leaders work to accommodate various political interests while presenting a united front ahead of the election.

For the ADC, the challenge extends beyond naming a campaign Director-General.

The party must also integrate politicians drawn from different political backgrounds into a single campaign structure capable of taking on the ruling APC.

With Atiku leading the presidential ticket and Amaechi as his running mate, party leaders are expected to ensure that the campaign council reflects Nigeria’s geopolitical diversity while also rewarding loyal party members and coalition partners.

The expected appointment of Tambuwal is therefore being viewed not merely as an administrative decision but as an important political signal regarding the direction of the opposition campaign and the calibre of politicians expected to drive Atiku’s latest bid for the Presidency.

The ruling All Progressives Congress is also intensifying consultations ahead of the commencement of campaigns, with multiple sources in the Presidency and the party disclosing that former Nasarawa State Governor, Tanko Al-Makura, and Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, are the leading contenders to head President Bola Tinubu and Vice-President Kashim Shettima’s 2027 Presidential Campaign Organisation.

Although no final decision has been taken, insiders said the discussions had narrowed considerably, with Uzodimma currently enjoying the backing of influential party stakeholders.

According to the sources, the APC leadership is weighing political experience, organisational capacity, regional acceptability and religious considerations before making its final choice.

The campaign Director-General is expected to coordinate what could become the largest campaign operation in the country, considering the APC’s control of the Federal Government and its extensive political structures across many states.

Party strategists believe the position requires an individual capable of harmonising the interests of governors, ministers, federal lawmakers, party leaders and thousands of campaign officials expected to participate in the nationwide mobilisation.

The emergence of Uzodimma as the leading contender is also being linked to broader political calculations within the APC.

Since President Tinubu and Vice-President Shettima are both Muslims, party leaders are said to be considering a prominent Christian political figure to coordinate the campaign in order to reinforce the administration’s message of inclusiveness.

The APC’s decision to field a Muslim-Muslim presidential ticket in the 2023 election generated intense national debate, with many Christian groups expressing concerns over religious representation.

Although the ticket eventually secured victory, party leaders are said to be mindful of sustaining confidence among Christian voters as the President seeks a second term.

A presidency source told The PUNCH that Uzodimma’s emergence would help project religious balance while also rewarding one of the party’s influential governors.

The source said, “At the moment, it is still unclear who will eventually lead the campaign organisation. However, Governor Hope Uzodimma is the person being tipped by party stakeholders to head the APC’s presidential campaign team. That could still change before a final decision is made.”

Imo governor has remained one of President Tinubu’s closest political allies and currently serves as Chairman of the Progressive Governors’ Forum, the umbrella body of APC governors.

His position has placed him at the centre of several strategic engagements involving the ruling party, making him one of the administration’s leading political coordinators.

Al-Makura, another respected party stalwart, is also regarded as a loyal party man.

A founding member of the APC’s legacy bloc, the former Nasarawa governor has played key roles in the evolution of the ruling party from the days of the Congress for Progressive Change through the merger that produced the APC in 2013.

His longstanding relationship with President Tinubu and other party leaders has kept him among the influential figures within the ruling party.

Party insiders, however, stressed that consultations were still ongoing and that additional names could emerge before a final announcement.

Beyond the choice of campaign Director-General, the APC is also expected to unveil a broad-based campaign council comprising serving governors, former governors, ministers, lawmakers and party leaders from across the federation.

For the Labour Party, attention is centred on consolidating the gains made during the 2023 presidential election, when the party recorded one of its strongest electoral performances since its formation.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Ken Asogwa, confirmed that consultations on the campaign structure had reached an advanced stage.

According to him, the party already has a Director-General but has delayed the official unveiling pending the completion of the campaign organogram.

He said, “Our campaign structure is being put together. There is a DG in place, although it has not been unveiled officially. I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to start reeling out names ahead of time. The DG is in place, I can assure you. The entire organogram is being fine-tuned as we speak. I’m sure that before August 19, it will be unveiled publicly.”

The Labour Party believes its greatest electoral strength lies in its institutional relationship with organised labour.

Asogwa said the party intended to build its campaign around the Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress.

See also  Why Sowore is being detained – CP

“We have always said that we have the biggest structure in Nigeria that any political party can have, which, in the past, the Labour Party did not harness. That is the institutional membership that we have in NLC and TUC.”

He explained that the party was working to integrate the structures of both labour unions into its nationwide campaign architecture.

According to him, “So, going into this election, the party has decided to weld together those institutional memberships with the mainstream party. So, what we are doing now is to adopt NLC and TUC as our pivot. The entire structure is built around them, including how we are going to even police our votes during the election.”

The LP spokesman expressed confidence that labour unions would provide the party with a nationwide grassroots structure extending to every polling unit.

He said, “I can assure you that we are going to harness that potential during this campaign period. This time, the NLC is back on track and they have not withdrawn that commitment to serve as party agent during the election. They are ready to deploy all their members across the 186,000 polling units in Nigeria to serve as party agents for free.”

The party also believes that such an arrangement would substantially reduce campaign costs.

Addressing concerns over funding, Asogwa acknowledged that the LP could not compete financially with the ruling party but insisted that prudent management of resources would remain its strategy.

He added, “But for the campaign, the model we are adopting is quite different from the model that the APC or any other political party is adopting. We are not going to adopt or run a bogus or outsized campaign when we know that we don’t have the kind of deep pockets that can finance such a campaign.”

According to him, “So our model is going to be very productive but it’s going to be cost effective at the same time.”

He also acknowledged that supporters of the party would contribute towards campaign expenses.

“Sure! Every presidential campaign comes with people who are willing to defray one or two costs based on the belief they have in what stories they have been selling to them and to the public. So definitely there are so many Nigerians who are committed to assisting the party defray some campaign costs.”

On insecurity, Asogwa urged the Federal Government to create an enabling environment for campaigns across the country.

“I will answer this question by urging the government in place to do what is necessary to at least curtail the state of insecurity in the land.”

Recalling the postponement of the 2015 general election, he said, “I remember in 2015, in the build-up to that election, President Goodluck Jonathan shifted the election a bit to allow for the military to allow the military carried out an onslaught against Boko Haram in the Northeast then. And within that period that he shifted the election, the military did a very good job in pushing back the terrorists and allowing people to come out to vote.”

He added, “So I urge the government in place today to replicate the same thing, to see that the insecurity is at least reduced to the barest minimum, to allow people to go out and perform their civic responsibility.”

The Social Democratic Party is equally putting finishing touches to its campaign structure.

SDP National Publicity Secretary, Rufus Aiyenigba, told The PUNCH that unlike some political parties still searching for candidates and campaign structures, the SDP had commenced preparations long before now.

He said, “We already have our strategy on ground long before now. We had our plans well laid out. That was why we became the SDP was the first to announce its presidential candidate among all political parties. He also didn’t spend more than 24 hours before he nominated a renowned public intellectual, Dr. Usman Bugaje as his running mate.”

The spokesman said the party would soon unveil a formidable campaign team.

“I can assure you, we are going to put up a formidable campaign structure in the characteristics of the presidential candidate. Our campaign DG and his team will unveiled very shortly.”

Aiyenigba said the SDP was not overly concerned about campaign financing, insisting that financial resources alone had never guaranteed electoral victory in Nigeria.

He said the party would instead rely on grassroots mobilisation, public goodwill and the personal appeal of its presidential candidate.

The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi.
The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Photo: X | Peter Obi.

“No, as much as I agree with you that funding is important, money alone doesn’t win elections. We all saw the impact Peter Obi made during the 2023 election. Yet, he didn’t have all the billions like the ruling APC.

“The most important funding support you have is the people. And that is what Adebayo is leveraging on. I believe you saw a trending video of the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal endorsing Obi as the best man for the job.

“As much as you are getting the groundswell of endorsements of political influencers like that, you know that there will also be corresponding moral and logistical support to power the project. I can tell you that Prince Adewole Adebayo is by no means a small fry when it comes to capacity to fund his election,” he stated.

Responding to concerns that worsening insecurity across parts of the country could affect campaigns, Aiyenigba argued that the prevailing security situation had, in fact, strengthened the opposition’s message.

He said, “Let me tell you that the campaigns are already going on. Adebayo is the only candidate in Nigeria today who has been traversing the length and breadth of Nigeria. And you see that everywhere he goes, the media follows him, you know that.

See also  2027: Tinubu’ll win more than 32 states if Jonathan contests – ADC Rep, Leke Abejide

“When the president could not even visit Jos metropolis, Adewole went to the neighbourhood and visited the affected families where those things happened. But the president had to turn back from the airport.

“Just two or three months ago, we were in Ilesha, where the whole of Afenifere moved into the party. We don’t see the insecurity as a setback. In fact, it is a major campaign tool for us. All over the country, the people are living in grave despair, fear, anxiety, social tension, uncertainties and all of that.

“They are crying and asking when are we getting out of this? It’s enough campaign on its own. We need to keep assuring the people that a solution is in sight. This is why they need Get the right person in power and you’ll get the right answers.”

Like the SDP, the New Nigeria Peoples Party said it had entered the final stage of constituting its campaign council.

The party’s National Chairman, Major Agbo, disclosed that the National Working Committee would adopt the list of nominees this week before making the composition public.

He said, “Oh, we are working on it. The NWC is expected to adopt one (DG nominees) by Friday this week. Yes, nominations are coming in. Already, we have a committee in place to constitute the campaign council. They are working on it.

“We want to have a broad committee that cuts across all sections of the country. We decided to entrust that to a small committee to be able to come up with what is broadly acceptable. Nominations are still coming in. By Friday, we’ll fine-tune and release the names to the press.”

The NNPP chairman said the party deliberately wanted a campaign structure that reflected Nigeria’s diversity and gave every geopolitical zone a sense of belonging.

On campaign funding, Agbo acknowledged that resources remained important in modern elections but argued that excessive monetisation had become a major obstacle to the growth of smaller political parties.

According to him, “Our position on this issue of campaign funding always is that we must deliberately look for how to go away from this heavily monetised political system, which is stifling to the younger political parties.

“However, I can tell you that we are not afraid of what they have, because as far as we are concerned, we are talking to Nigerians to move away from this issue of monetising our votes and all of that. So, we are not bothered about it.”

He also dismissed suggestions that the ruling APC’s access to government resources would necessarily determine the outcome of the election.

“We also would not want to speak on the war chest that the APC is bringing to the campaign because that is within the speculative realm. Of course, they (ruling party) have not come out to tell you what they are actually bringing for the campaign.

“Of course, funding is a major determinant of who wins elections. But at this level now, we have concertedly spoken to Nigerians on the need to move away from money when it comes to votes casting and all of that. So, we hope that Nigerians will see reasons why they should also look at the younger parties that probably do not have the kind of resources that the party in government has. So, we are not bothered or worried.”

On campaign strategy, Agbo said the party intended to return to traditional grassroots mobilisation.

He explained, “We are trying to adopt the house-to-house, community-to-community and village-to-village approach, using what our people used before they brought in this issue of money factor. We will be using town criers, town halls, community meetings and grassroots meetings.

“Our party all along has always been the party of the ordinary people. So, we don’t want to move away from it. And the only way you can reach ordinary people is to adopt the strategies that are known to them. That is the use of town criers. Those are the things they are used to. So, we want to strengthen that for our 2027 general election.”

On insecurity, he maintained that elections would still hold despite prevailing security challenges.

“We saw it during the build-up to 2023. It looks like there won’t be a Nigeria at the end of the election. But at the end of the day, people were able to move around to do their campaigns and visited where their voter cards are domiciled, to be able to cast their votes. So, I don’t see anything different from that.”

He added, “Funny enough, as I said, in a few days or a few weeks to the election, it will always subside. We are going to see it happen. This year would also not be an exception.”

The National Democratic Coalition also confirmed that consultations on its campaign structure had yet to be concluded.

NDC National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, said the party leadership was carefully weighing several considerations before naming a campaign Director-General.

He said, “We have not decided on that. We are also meeting and consultation. Once the consultation is concluded, we shall announce the DG of our campaign at the appropriate time.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

INEC unveils gov, Assembly candidates Saturday ahead of 2027 polls

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission will on Saturday, August 29, display the list of candidates nominated by political parties for the February 6, 2027, governorship and state Houses of Assembly elections.

The governorship election will be conducted in 28 states, while state Houses of Assembly elections will be held in all 36 states of the federation.

According to the electoral timetable, the governorship poll will take place in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Delta, Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Cross River, Enugu, Ebonyi, Abia, Kwara, Benue, Plateau, Niger and Nasarawa states.

Other states where governorship elections are scheduled are Borno, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Bauchi, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Kaduna, Katsina, Zamfara, Kebbi and Sokoto.

The elections will not be held in Ondo, Osun, Ekiti, Edo, Bayelsa, Anambra, Imo and Kogi states, where governorship polls were held at different times because of the staggered electoral cycle.

INEC had said the publication of the candidate lists was part of its preparations for the 2027 general election and would enable political parties, candidates and the public to verify the information submitted to the commission.

The 22 registered political parties are expected to field new candidates in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Yobe, Borno, Adamawa, Bauchi, Gombe, Kwara and Nasarawa, where the tenure of the incumbent governors will expire in 2027.

The commission is also expecting political parties contesting the presidential and National Assembly elections to submit their final lists of candidates by Saturday, August 29.

The deadline follows the August 22 deadline for candidates seeking to withdraw from the 2027 elections.

See also  Natasha resumes at Senate, calls Akpabio dictator

Under Section 31 of the Electoral Act 2026, a candidate seeking to withdraw from an election is required to submit a written notice, signed by the candidate and accompanied by an affidavit, personally to the political party that nominated the candidate.

The provision is intended to establish a formal process for candidates who decide to withdraw after being nominated by their political parties.

INEC is expected to publish the final list of presidential and National Assembly candidates on Saturday, September 12.

The list will include candidates for the Senate and House of Representatives, alongside those contesting the presidential election.

With the August 29 deadline approaching, political parties are expected to conclude their candidate nomination and substitution processes ahead of the commission’s publication of the final lists.

The February 6, 2027 governorship and state Houses of Assembly elections will form part of the wider electoral programme for the 2027 general elections.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku-Tinubu faceoff widens over subsidy, $16bn power projects ahead of 2027

Published

on

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has challenged the Federal Government to investigate and prosecute him if it has evidence linking him to the alleged $16bn power expenditure while in office.

Atiku, the presidential candidate of the African DemocraticCongress, accused the President Bola Tinubu-led government of recycling old allegations to divert attention from questions over the use of revenues saved from petrol subsidy removal.

Atiku, in a statement on Wednesday, issued by his SeniorSpecial Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, said the resurfacing of allegations surrounding power-sector projects, privatisation and public assets was an attempt to shift public attention from the economic hardship confronting Nigerians.

The Olusegun Obasanjo administration’s power sector spending and commitments, commonly cited at about $16bn, became the subject of a House of Representatives probe after his exit from office in 2007.

In 2008, the Umaru Yar’Adua administration raised questions about expenditure on the power sector, with the allegation initially reported as about $11bn, before the figure became commonly cited as $16bn.

In his defence, Obasanjo cited an EFCC investigation and a presidential review process, arguing that these had undermined the allegation that $16bn had simply been squandered.

A report claimed only about $3.7bn of the $10bn budgeted amount had actually been disbursed, with the balance retained in an account at the Central Bank of Nigeria.

Also, an EFCC report published in 2018 reportedly revealed that about N1.2tn had been allocated to NIPP, but only approximately N360.7bn was paid to contractors by the time Obasanjo left office in 2007.

It also reported about N273.65bn spent on PHCN between 1999 and 2007.

Atiku challenged the Tinubu government to account for the resources it had gained since the removal of petrol subsidy, asking, “Where is the people’s money?”

He said the allegations against him had been repeatedly raised over the years without resulting in any prosecution, despite successive governments having access to the investigative machinery of the state.

“The National Assembly investigated the power projects. I was never invited to answer any allegation of wrongdoing.

“Yes, I chaired the National Council on Privatisation as Vice President. But on the power project, I disagreed with its concept and did not preside over its implementation. The responsible minister did. The same applies to the Aluminium Smelter matter.

“I have repeatedly asked to be investigated. I left office in 2007 and have spent much of the period since then opposing governments in power. If there is evidence that I stole public money, why has no government produced it before a court?

“It is still not too late. Investigate me. Invite me. Produce the evidence. Prosecute me if you have a case. But propaganda cannot substitute for evidence,” the statement read in part.

The ADC chieftain’s latest challenge comes amid an intensifying political confrontation between the opposition and the Federal Government over the state of the economy and the impact of the government’s reforms. Atiku has made the economic consequences of subsidy removal a central part of his criticism of the administration, arguing that Nigerians have endured substantial increases in the cost of petrol, transportation, food and other basic necessities without seeing commensurate benefits from the additional government revenues.

He noted that the controversy over the power projects was being revived because his demand for greater transparency over the proceeds of subsidy removal had become politically uncomfortable for the administration.

“They removed subsidy from the poor and promised that the sacrifice would free resources for development. Nigerians accepted extraordinary pain on that promise.“Today, petrol is more expensive, transportation is more expensive, food is more expensive, and the purchasing power of the Nigerian worker has been devastated,” he added.

See also  Nigeria spends $10bn annually on food imports, minister laments

He further questioned the government’s fiscal priorities, alleging that while ordinary Nigerians were being asked to endure the consequences of subsidy removal, powerful economic interests continued to benefit from fiscal incentives, waivers and concessions.“Meanwhile, government revenues have increased, while fiscal incentives, waivers, tax credits and concessions continue to be available to powerful economic interests. So, our question remains brutally simple: where is the people’s money?”

Atiku argued that the government could not justify removing a major form of relief from Nigerians because the resulting savings would be redirected to development while simultaneously describing economic interventions targeted at powerful interests as incentives.

“You cannot take relief away from the poor, celebrate the resulting revenue and then tell the same impoverished citizens that government intervention on their behalf is economically irresponsible while interventions benefiting powerful interests are called incentives. That hypocrisy is precisely what we are challenging,” he stressed.

Tinubu announced the removal of fuel subsidy shortly after his inauguration in May 2023, ending a long-standing system under which the Federal Government subsidised the cost of the product.The government defended the decision as necessary to reduce pressure on public finances and redirect resources towards infrastructure and social programmes.

The policy, however, triggered a sharp increase in petrol prices and contributed to higher transportation and living costs, making subsidy removal one of the most politically contentious issues of the Tinubu presidency. The government has since introduced various measures to cushion the effects of the reforms, while maintaining that the previous subsidy regime was financially unsustainable.

However, Atiku proposed alternative economic measures and has increasingly positioned accountability, cost-of-living pressures and the management of public resources at the centre of his campaign. His latest statement also comes against the backdrop of growing political activities ahead of the 2027 presidential election, with the ADC and other opposition forces mounting increasingly direct attacks on the Tinubu administration.

Atiku dismissed what he described as “sponsored social-media mud slinging”, insisting that such attacks would not deter him from demanding accountability.

“The people who removed subsidy from the poor cannot frighten us into silence by resurrecting allegations that governments with all the investigative machinery of the Nigerian state have had nearly two decades to establish,” he said.

“If you have evidence against Atiku, bring it. If you have a case, prosecute it. But if you have neither, stop manufacturing distractions and answer Nigerians. You removed the subsidy. You collected the savings. Where is the money?”

Presidency slams Atiku

However, the Presidency criticised Atiku over what it described as conflicting positions on petrol subsidy, saying the different explanations coming from him and his aides within one week showed a lack of clarity in his policy proposal.

The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, stated this in a statement released on Wednesday titled, ‘Atiku confused on petrol subsidy; third U-turn in one week shows he is simply playing politics.’

Onanuga said Atiku’s position had changed or been explained differently three times within a week, beginning with a statement by his spokesperson, Paul Ibe, that the former Vice President would restore petrol subsidy if elected and later phase it out.

He said another aide, Phrank Shaibu, subsequently described Ibe’s position as an “unauthorised and misleading characterisation” of Atiku’s stance, arguing that the subsidy would instead remain until domestic refining increased, supply stabilised and market competition deepened.

See also  PDP inaugurates 44-member zoning committee, demands Wike’s total loyalty

According to Onanuga, Atiku later intervened and reaffirmed that his position had not changed, saying he would restore what he described as a targeted subsidy.

He quoted Atiku as saying, “I will restore targeted subsidy and put purchasing power back in the hands of Nigerians.”

The Presidency questioned the different explanations, asking why an aide would describe the subsidy as temporary and subject to a phase-out while another disowned that position before Atiku himself reaffirmed the original proposal.

Onanuga said, “This is not merely a matter of semantics. It is a serious policy contradiction.”

He also challenged Atiku to explain how his proposed subsidy would work, including its cost, beneficiaries, funding mechanism and conditions for its eventual removal.

“We therefore urge Atiku to stop shifting positions and explain precisely what he means by ‘targeted subsidy’: how much will it cost, who will benefit, how will beneficiaries be identified, how will it be funded and what objective economic conditions will determine its eventual termination?” he asked.

The presidential aide also rejected what he described as an over simplification of the relationship between petrol prices and cost of living, arguing that several other factors, including insecurity, exchange rates, logistics, storage, flooding and agricultural input costs influenced food inflation.

He further questioned the ADC candidate’s proposal to link subsidy to the price of crude oil, noting that refining crude produces several other petroleum products apart from petrol. Onanuga cited diesel, aviation fuel and kerosene among the products derived from crude oil, and asked whether Atiku’s proposed subsidy would extend to those products as well.

“Jet fuel and kerosene make up about nine per cent of the barrel. Kerosene and jet fuel were deregulated in 2009, and subsidies removed in 2016,” Onanuga stated.

On the other petroleum by-products, he added, “About 10 to 15 per cent of the barrel creates base ingredients for synthetic rubber, nylon, polyester, and plastics used in everyday goods like toothbrushes, cups, and packaging.

“Asphalt makes up about two to four per cent of the barrel. Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids, like propane and butane, make up about four per cent.

“Lubricants and waxes constitute about one to two per cent. Petroleum coke and sulfur form the solid residue left from refining.”

He specifically recalled that diesel was deregulated in 2004 under the administration in which Atiku served as Vice-President, while kerosene and aviation fuel were deregulated at different times.

The statement also accused Atiku of focusing excessively on petrol while overlooking other products obtained from crude oil. The Presidency maintained that a comprehensive economic policy should address the wider factors driving inflation and the cost of living rather than focus solely on petrol prices.

Onanuga concluded that the economy was too important to be subjected to what he described as “policy somersaults, incoherence, destructive populism and election gimmicks.”

He questioned the consistency of subsidising only petrol while ignoring other by-products used by equally vulnerable Nigerians.

“Will Atiku subsidise all these by-products of the barrel as well, since kerosene is used by the underprivileged to cook, and many homes and factories use diesel to power generators and delivery trucks?

“And will he allow the refineries to supply discounted crude oil to profit from 55 per cent of the by-products, while focusing subsidy only on petrol, his obsession?”

The Presidency further argued that the former Vice President was “definitely suffering from a lack of basic understanding of his newfound policy prescription.”

See also  PDP governors warn Wike camp, says party won’t bow to impunity

‘Go to court’

In a related development, the All Progressives Congress challenged Atiku to go to court and provide evidence to substantiate his claim that “thieves” were responsible for the country’s political and economic problems ahead of the2027 general elections.

The ruling party’s reaction followed remarks attributed to the ADC presidential candidate in which he said the 2027 presidential contest was a race against individuals whom he described as thieves.

Daily Trust, citing a video posted on Atiku’s social media handles on Tuesday night, reported that the former Vice President made the remarks while addressing supporters at his residence in Abuja.

“We are competing with thieves. They stole the election. Now, they have stolen the economy. They have stolen everything,” Atiku was quoted as saying.

Responding to the development, the APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, urged Atiku to seek legal redress if he had evidence to support his allegations.

Speaking with The PUNCH, Ibrahim questioned whether Atiku had lost confidence in the judiciary.

“As a former Vice President of the country and as someone who has contested elections and lost before, I don’t know if Atiku is passing a vote of no confidence on the judiciary. If he is, then he has no business contesting again. ‘’But if he has confidence in the judiciary and he is making these allegations, I think he knows the right place to go, to prove his point. He should go to court, present facts to support his claims that he is competing against thieves. It is for the court to take a decision and those thieves will certainly be made to have their day in court,” he said.

NANS tackles Atiku

Meanwhile, the National Association of Nigerian Students criticised the former VP’s proposal to restore fuel subsidy if elected President in 2027, describing the promise as a political response to economic hardship rather than a sustainable solution to Nigeria’s fiscal challenges.

NANS president, Akinteye Babatunde, stated this in a statement on Wednesday, arguing that returning to the old subsidy system without a clear structural framework would recreate the problems that made the policy unsustainable.

“Every sane and patriotic citizen who is conversant with our nation’s economy will agree with me that the removal of the fuel subsidy was a difficult but necessary economic reform aimed at ending an increasingly unsustainable system that consumed trillions of naira, benefited higher fuel consumers disproportionately, encouraged smuggling, and constrained the government’s ability to invest in critical sectors.”

The student leader stressed that the real test of the reform was not simply the amount of money saved but how the government deployed the resources.

“However, the real measure of the reform should not be the savings alone, but what the government does with those savings,” he said.

“Clearly, we have seen the government increase state subventions and redirect resources into education, healthcare, infrastructure and agriculture.

Realistically, the Nigerian people have made a productive sacrifice that must ultimately translate into a stronger and more sustainable economy,” he said.

The NANS president argued that an outright return to subsidy without addressing the structural weaknesses of the previous arrangement would only recreate the problems that necessitated its removal.

“This is why calls or promises for the outright return ofsubsidy, without a clear structural framework for addressing the fundamental weaknesses that made the policy unsustainable in the first place, amount to little more than a political response to a genuine economic challenge.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku disowns aide, insists ‘I will restore subsidy’

Published

on

Presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar, has insisted that his position on subsidy has not changed, adding that he will restore it.

Speaking on Tuesday when he received the Osun State leadership of the ADC in Abuja, Atiku disowned comments made by one of his media aides, Paul Ibe, during an interview on AIT, stating that he was not speaking on his authority.

“Earlier, one of my press aides contradicted me in a policy statement as far as subsidy is concerned.

“I want to repeat categorically that when I said I would return to subsidy, I will! Nigeria is rich enough to look after the welfare of its citizens. Let it be clearly stated that he was not speaking on my own authority,” Atiku said.

Ibe had earlier in his interview said his principal would restore petrol subsidy if elected president in 2027, but would gradually phase out the intervention after the economy recovers.

But Atiku, in a statement posted on his X, countered, saying, “On the question of subsidy, my position has not changed and will not change: I will restore it! A nation as blessed as ours has no business abandoning its citizens to hardship. Nigeria is rich enough to look after her own.

“I believe the wealth of a nation is not measured by how much government collects, but by how much the money in the pockets of its people can buy.

“I want wages to have value again. I want farmers to move produce without transport swallowing their profits. I want families to fill their baskets without emptying their pockets. I want businesses to produce, employ and prosper.

“That is why I will restore targeted subsidy and put purchasing power back in the hands of Nigerians.

“When fuel rises, transport rises. When transport rises, food rises. When food rises, families suffer. I will break that wretched chain that has defined our national life in the nearly four years of Tinubu’s presidency.

“I will support Nigerian production, reduce energy costs and restore purchasing power. I will not restore the import racket; I will restore relief.

See also  ADC unveils Borno chapter, pledges strong opposition to APC

“I restated this commitment when I received the Osun State leadership of the ADC in Abuja on Tuesday. I will make the naira in your pocket worth more, make daily living affordable again, and secure our people. That is the Nigeria I intend to build.”

Atiku also drew a clear line between his proposed petroleum intervention and Nigeria’s former fuel import subsidy regime, saying any support under his administration would be targeted at domestic production and tied to measurable performance.

In a statement issued on Tuesday by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice president’s camp said Atiku had not proposed bringing back the old system under which government subsidised imported petrol, but rather a capped and transparent intervention designed to support local refining, increase supply and ultimately bring down energy costs.

“For the avoidance of doubt, policy belongs to the candidate, not the spokesperson.

“Our responsibility as communicators is to explain Atiku’s position accurately, not create formulations capable of confusing Nigerians or handing opponents convenient talking points,” Shaibu said.

According to him, Atiku’s proposal would involve a “targeted, capped, transparently budgeted and independently audited subsidy,” for domestic refining and production.

The intervention, he added, would not operate according to an arbitrary withdrawal date.

Instead, it would be phased out as domestic refining capacity expands, fuel supply becomes more stable, and competition improves.

“There is no arbitrary withdrawal date. As domestic refining expands, supply stabilises, competition deepens, and the market becomes capable of delivering affordable prices without government support, the intervention progressively becomes unnecessary,” he added.

He likened the proposed arrangement to temporary scaffolding used during construction.

“You do not remove scaffolding because the calendar says so. You remove it when the building can stand securely on its own,” he said.

The clarification comes as the fuel subsidy debate has returned to the centre of the 2027 presidential contest.

President Bola Tinubu abolished the petrol subsidy at his inauguration on May 29, 2023, a decision that triggered a sharp increase in petrol prices and fed into a broader cost-of-living crisis.

The reform, alongside the liberalisation of the foreign exchange market, has also been defended by the Federal Government as necessary to strengthen public finances and attract investment.

The subsidy question has nevertheless remained politically sensitive because of its direct impact on transport, food prices, household expenses and the operating costs of businesses.

See also  PDP inaugurates 44-member zoning committee, demands Wike’s total loyalty

Atiku reignited the debate last week when he said he would bring back the petroleum subsidy if elected, arguing that Nigerians had not benefited sufficiently from the savings associated with its removal.

His latest clarification seeks to redefine that position as a production-support mechanism rather than a return to the old import-driven arrangement.

The ADC presidential candidate said any intervention would be subject to controls intended to prevent the leakages associated with the former subsidy regime.

Rather than focusing on when government support would end, Shaibu said the emphasis should be on whether the intervention achieves its intended economic objectives.

“The real question is simple: Why has everything become so expensive, and what will Atiku do to make life affordable again?” he asked.

He accused the Tinubu administration of transferring the burden of its economic reforms to households and businesses, arguing that an Atiku government would instead focus on reducing production and transportation costs, strengthening domestic refining and rebuilding purchasing power.

“Tinubu transferred the shock of his reforms to Nigerian families.

“Atiku will reduce production and transportation costs, strengthen domestic refining, and restore purchasing power.

“The choice is not removal of subsidy versus restoration of subsidy. It is Expensive Nigeria versus Affordable Nigeria,” Shaibu said.

Ibe, speaking on AIT, also said the proposed subsidy would differ from the former regime, as government support would be tied to crude oil production and domestic refining.

He said the policy would provide temporary relief to Nigerians and businesses, stimulate economic activity and improve productivity.

“What he’s simply saying is that the subsidy that he is advocating will be tied to the barrel, the crude oil barrel. This is perhaps the only thing that we have in so much abundance that Nigerians have not yet benefited from,” Ibe said.

According to him, crude oil would be supplied to local refiners at a discounted price, enabling them to produce petrol and diesel at lower costs, which would translate into reduced pump prices for consumers.

See also  Natasha resumes at Senate, calls Akpabio dictator

“The crude oil will be sold at a discounted price, subsidised to refiners, and that will enable refiners to be able to produce fuel and diesel at a cheap cost. And when they produce cheaply, they will sell at the real pump price,” he said.

Ibe said an independent committee would determine the appropriate price of crude oil supplied to refiners, taking prevailing market conditions into account.

He added that despite the deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector, government could monitor prices to ensure refiners and marketers operated within the framework of the policy.

“There’ll be a window because, of course, we deregulated. You may not fix the price, but you can have price monitoring to ensure that everybody aligns with what government hopes to achieve,” he said.

Ibe said the intervention would be temporary and aimed at reviving economic activity and increasing productivity.

“It is not something that is… It is for a time, and it is essentially to ensure that we jumpstart this economy,” he said.

The former vice-president’s spokesman also criticised the administration of President Tinubu for removing petrol subsidy alongside other major economic reforms without allowing the economy sufficient time to adjust.

“No surgeon, no doctor would carry out two or more serious major surgeries, one after the other. They would do one, allow the patient to recuperate, and then undertake the second, or the third.

“But what has this administration done? The issue of subsidy, flippant. No cabinet. No advisers. Just in the heat of the moment, it has been removed. No shock absorbers. Nothing. No palliatives. Absolutely nothing,” Ibe said.

He argued that the simultaneous removal of petrol subsidy, deregulation of the foreign exchange market and electricity subsidy had worsened the economic hardship faced by Nigerians.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending