Connect with us

News

Amosun hits back at Abiodun on Buhari Estate row

Published

on

Former Ogun State Governor, Ibikunle Amosun, has challenged Governor Dapo Abiodun’s claim of having “rescued” the President Muhammadu Buhari Estate in Abeokuta from forfeiture, following legal action instituted by the project’s contractor over non-payment.

Amosun described the claim as a distortion of the estate’s history, insisting that the project was already substantially completed before the present administration assumed office in 2019.

In a statement titled, “The Rescue of PMB Estate by Gov Dapo Abiodun: The Limit of Falsehood,” issued on Monday by his media office and made available to journalists, Amosun said the claim “could not be farther from the truth.”

He said the estate’s infrastructure contract, valued at about N3.5bn, had been fully mobilised and was approximately 95 per cent complete before the end of his administration.

According to the statement, the estate was developed on approximately 500 hectares of acquired land along the Abeokuta-Sagamu Expressway.

About 170 hectares constituted the master-planned first phase, while approximately 50 hectares were developed as the pilot scheme.

It said the estate was conceived as a Three Arms residential zone for members of the executive, legislature and judiciary.

The statement added that the new Ogun State Judicial Complex, located opposite the estate, was designed to complement the judges’ quarters, while members of the executive and legislature were expected to reside within the estate.

Amosun’s media office said it had refrained from responding to what it described as repeated attempts by the Abiodun administration to rewrite the history of projects executed by his predecessor.

However, it said the latest claims about the PMB Estate warranted a response because they allegedly went beyond political disagreement to an attack on Amosun’s personal integrity.

“We did not respond, not because the allegations possessed merit, nor because their authors had uncovered anything capable of unsettling our record.

“We remained silent because we considered the continuing peace, dignity and stability of our dear state more important than exchanging words with those who appear to require our name as an explanation for their own stewardship,” the statement said.

See also  Lagos firm seeks IGP intervention over alleged land grabbers’ threat

It argued that “governance cannot remain a perpetual press conference about one’s predecessor,” adding that every administration must eventually be judged by its own record.

“At some point, excuses expire, propaganda becomes threadbare, and every administration must stand before the people on the strength—or weakness—of its own record,” it said.

According to the media office, virtually all the infrastructure listed by the Abiodun administration had been completed under the Amosun administration and inaugurated as part of Ogun State’s 40th anniversary celebrations by former President Muhammadu Buhari on February 3, 2016.

“These included a network of 43 roads, already named after some of the founding fathers of the state, with street lighting, electricity grid, water distribution network, drainage networks, central sewage system, gas supply lines and fibre optic cable ducts.

“In addition, there was a fully developed master plan with commercial, multi-residential, school districts and other locations properly delineated in the 170-hectare layout,” the statement said.

It added that, contrary to the suggestion that the estate was largely undeveloped, infrastructure within the pilot area had reached approximately 95 per cent completion by May 2019.

“This is not conjecture. It is verifiable and documented in the formal handover notes of the supervising ministry,” it said.

The media office said the infrastructure contract was valued at approximately N3.5bn and that the contractor, ZCC, had been fully mobilised.

“More importantly, sufficient funding was available against the outstanding works to enable the contractor to complete the project,” it said.

Questioning the governor’s claim that the project had almost stalled and faced forfeiture through litigation, Amosun asked: “If the contractor had been fully mobilised, the infrastructure was already approximately 95 per cent complete, and sufficient funds remained available for the outstanding work, who then took the government to court and threatened seizure/forfeiture, and for what reason?”

The former governor said the question was particularly important because the current narrative referred to a legal dispute arising from unpaid obligations to the contractor and an alleged threat of forfeiture.

See also  Fire-ravaged Lagos airport old terminal to be demolished – Keyamo

He said the government should explain when and how the dispute arose, the sums allegedly outstanding and how a contractor that had been adequately mobilised became the basis of an existential threat to the estate.

Amosun also cited the estate’s commissioning in 2016 as evidence that substantial infrastructure had already been completed before he left office.

“In 2016, when Ogun State marked the 40th anniversary of its creation, activities were held at the estate. President Muhammadu Buhari commissioned the estate and drove round the tarred roads with all the street lights on.

“He was also hosted to a state banquet at the so-called abandoned estate. A location without roads, electricity, drainage, access, central water and sewage system and substantial infrastructure could hardly have hosted such major events,” he said.

The media office also raised concerns about subscribers to the estate, particularly Nigerians in the diaspora, who it said had certificates of occupancy, development approvals and other relevant documents but could no longer access their land.

“A significant proportion of these purchasers were reportedly Nigerians in the diaspora. What has happened to them? Some lawful allottees now face difficulties accessing, possessing or developing plots they legitimately acquired.

“The government must explain to the public what new services it added to the project that had not been done before. Is it the road network, electricity, drainage, access, sewage system or what precisely?”

It also called for a comprehensive account of the status of the entire 500-hectare estate.

“If the estate has genuinely been ‘rescued,’ the public deserves a comprehensive account of the condition of the entire 500 hectares.

“How much of the land remains intact? How much has been allocated? How much has been developed? How much has been redesignated? How much, if any, has been encroached upon or become the subject of dispute?

“These questions are essential because rescuing a public asset must mean securing and protecting it in its entirety, not merely developing one portion, commissioning a cluster of houses and proclaiming victory while leaving the fate of hundreds of hectares unexplained.”

See also  ‘Officers Behind Coup Are Ready To Face The Wrath’ – Musa

The statement further alleged that the 108-unit housing project being celebrated by Abiodun, “good as it is,” occupies less than one hectare of the 50 hectares for which infrastructure had been provided under the Amosun administration.

It also alleged that the project sits on land originally designated for a primary school.

The statement added that the Access Bank Training School, conceived under the Amosun administration and for which the bank had already been allocated and paid for land at the Abeokuta City Centre beside the GTBank Training School building, was now being constructed in a zone designated for the executive arm of government, including commissioners’ quarters.

The statement said this “clearly has made nonsense of the Three Arms Zone and indeed the entire master plan.”

Concluding, Amosun’s media office said, “The record is clear: the President Muhammadu Buhari Estate had already been conceived, acquired, master-planned, funded, substantially developed and inaugurated before the present administration assumed office.

“What is the status of the existing allottees whose plots and titles predated the present administration? And what has become of the remaining hundreds of hectares that constitute the greater part of the estate?

“Until these questions are answered fully, factually and transparently, the claim that Governor Dapo Abiodun ‘rescued’ the President Muhammadu Buhari Estate will remain less a faithful account of history than a political narrative deliberately constructed upon a false premise.”

Recall that Abiodun, according to a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Kayode Akinmade, was said to have rescued the PMB Estate from possible forfeiture and transformed the reportedly stalled project into a 108-unit modern residential community.

The statement added that the estate is scheduled for inauguration today, Tuesday, August 18, by the First Lady, Oluremi Tinubu.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic

Published

on

Russia has issued a stern warning to NATO, stating it is fully prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempts to isolate or cut off Kaliningrad, the heavily militarized Russian exclave bordered by Poland and Lithuania.

In a formal diplomatic document transmitted to NATO, Moscow condemned the alliance’s actions as a “dangerous and reckless course” carrying “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict.” The communication explicitly warned that escalation could trigger “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset.”

“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the note stated.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic
The warning underscores mounting friction over Kaliningrad, a strategic territory slightly larger than Connecticut that serves as a vital Russian military outpost on the Baltic Sea.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova echoed the sentiment online, condemning statements from Western officials which she characterized as manifestations of “Russophobia” and a readiness for war.

“If Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different sort of war – a very short war,” Zakharova wrote, adding a call for European leaders to heed Moscow’s warnings. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the series of diplomatic notes issued across European embassies as necessary reminders directed at “hotheads in Europe.”

See also  UK to launch digital ID scheme to curb illegal migration

 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte firmly rejected the threats during a defense conference hosted by Euronews in Brussels, reiterating the alliance’s defensive posture and urging Moscow to cease its rhetoric.

“We are a defensive alliance. And stop the nuclear threats. This is absolutely not called for and not helpful,” Rutte said, noting that alliance activities pose no threat to Russian territorial integrity.

When asked if the threat of nuclear deployment in the Baltic region was imminent, Rutte dismissed the prospect: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win against NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.”

Security analysts warn that the situation highlights a dangerous trajectory of mutual miscalculation. Nikolai Sokov, a Vienna-based nuclear analyst and former Russian diplomat, noted that escalating Western support for Ukraine risks pushing both sides past diplomatic thresholds.

“They expect more action, including a blockade of the Baltic Sea—just below the level of war in European calculation, but for them this will be open war. I see a risk of mutual miscalculation,” Sokov observed.

While Western governments continue to accuse Moscow of orchestrating a broader “hybrid war” across Europe through acts of sabotage and cyber interference, allegations that the Kremlin strongly denies, senior defense officials view the latest nuclear posturing as an unprecedented escalation unseen since the Cold War.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Five EU nations plan deportation centres in Africa

Published

on

Five European Union countries are moving ahead with plans to establish centres outside the bloc for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, with the first facility expected to begin operations in Africa in 2027.

German broadcaster DW reports on Thursday that the five countries are working on what they describe as “return hubs” for people who have been ordered to leave the EU.

Rwanda and Uganda have repeatedly been mentioned by diplomatic sources and European media as possible locations, but neither country has been confirmed as the host.

The five countries involved:

1. Greece

Greece is leading the initiative and has indicated that the first return hub could become operational in the second half of 2027.

Its Migration Minister, Thanos Plevris, said an African country had already been selected, although its identity had not been disclosed.

Greece is also expected to assume the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2027.

2. Germany

Germany is part of the five-country group pushing for agreements with countries outside the EU to establish return hubs.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt previously said the group wanted to reach an agreement with third countries that would enable the establishment of the facilities.

Germany has also participated in discussions on the legal framework governing transfers of migrants who have no legal right to remain in the EU.

3. Austria

Austria is the third member of the group pursuing the return-hub arrangement.

Its Interior Minister, Gerhard Karner, has argued that the project could help reduce irregular migration and dangerous journeys to Europe.

See also  Court orders interim takeover of Timipre Sylva’s nine properties

Austria has separately reached a migration and readmission agreement with Uzbekistan, although that agreement does not itself establish a return hub.

4. Denmark

Denmark has previously explored the possibility of transferring asylum seekers to a third country.

In 2021, Copenhagen passed legislation allowing such arrangements and held negotiations with Rwanda over a reception centre. The talks were suspended in 2023 after legal and logistical difficulties emerged.

Denmark has since shifted towards pursuing third-country arrangements together with other European countries.

5. Netherlands

The Netherlands is the fifth member of the group.

Dutch Migration Minister Bart van den Brink has said the proposed facilities should not be viewed as detention camps, but as places offering migrants who cannot remain in Europe another option while return arrangements are made.

The five countries agreed in September to step up discussions with potential partner countries and work towards establishing the hubs.

Plevris said Greece had selected an African country to host the facility but did not name it publicly.

The five countries, known as the “Group of Five”, have been working on a model under which migrants whose asylum applications have been finally rejected would be transferred to facilities outside the EU while arrangements for their return to their countries of origin are made.

The countries have stressed that the facilities would be open centres rather than detention camps.

Responsibility for people transferred to the hubs would remain with the participating European countries, rather than being handed over to the African host country.

The project is also expected to be financed by the five European countries, while organisations including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration could monitor operations.

See also  BREAKING: Ladoja to be crowned 44th Olubadan September 26

The plan follows several unsuccessful efforts by European countries to outsource asylum processing or deportation arrangements.

The most prominent was Britain’s Rwanda scheme, under which the Conservative government sought to send asylum seekers arriving irregularly in the UK to Rwanda.

The British Supreme Court ultimately ruled the policy unlawful, citing concerns that people sent to Rwanda faced a real risk of being returned to countries where they could face persecution or inhumane treatment.

Italy has also operated migrant centres in Albania since 2024. Italian courts initially blocked transfers to the centres, while one facility has subsequently been used as a deportation centre for men whose asylum applications were definitively rejected.

The Italian scheme has involved significant costs, with DW reporting that the expenditure is expected to exceed €670m by 2028.

A Reuters report published on September 30 said Rwanda had held preliminary discussions with some EU member states about potentially hosting transferred migrants, but that no agreement had been reached.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk returns to US govt for Pentagon war study

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will make a return to officially advising US President Donald Trump’s government by co-leading what the Pentagon called a study on the future of war.

Musk served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before departing in May 2025, having publicly fallen out with Trump.

In a speech at the Quantico military base, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said “Project Meridian” will be “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare”.

“We are leveraging a unique source of American advantage, one our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists,” Hegseth said.

Musk will be a co-leader of Project Meridian alongside Palmer Luckey, the 34-year-old co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, and Newt Gingrich, the 83-year-old Republican former House speaker.

Musk threw his support behind Trump and helped his return to the White House, but the men later had a high-profile blow-up over the president’s spending legislation.

He later resumed giving to Republican causes, including multimillion-dollar donations to individual candidates and conservative political groups.

Hegseth said the project’s purpose is to “creatively look to the future and identify the domains that we must conquer and capabilities we must master”.

Project members will include hand-picked private sector leaders and subject matter experts from across the innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.

Hegseth said he has directed Project Meridian’s findings to be completed and submitted within 120 days.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Lagos firm seeks IGP intervention over alleged land grabbers’ threat
Continue Reading

Trending