Connect with us

Politics

INEC probes source of ‘strange’ names in NDC list ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission has commenced an examination of its records to determine how names allegedly unknown to the Nigeria Democratic Congress appeared on the party’s list of candidates for the 2027 general elections.

The move followed allegations by the NDC that names of candidates it neither nominated nor authorised were uploaded and published as its candidates in several state House of Assembly constituencies, particularly in Anambra State.

The commission denied the allegations and said it removed candidates nominated by the party for the election and replaced them with names allegedly unknown to it.

The allegations, which particularly concern some state House of Assembly constituencies in Anambra State, were addressed by INEC’s Chief Press Secretary and Media Adviser to the INEC Chairman, Adedayo Oketola, in a chat with The PUNCH on Monday.

Responding to the allegations, Oketola stressed that INEC had no legal authority to nominate candidates for political parties or substitute its preferred candidates for those validly nominated by a political party in accordance with the law.

“For the avoidance of doubt, INEC does not nominate candidates for political parties. The nomination of candidates is the responsibility of political parties, subject to compliance with the Constitution, the Electoral Act 2026 and other applicable laws, Regulations and Guidelines,” he said.

He explained that while political parties were responsible for nominating and submitting their candidates, INEC’s role was to administer the electoral process in accordance with the Constitution, the Electoral Act and applicable regulations and guidelines.

According to him, the candidate nomination portal provided by the commission is the platform through which political parties submit the particulars of their candidates using access credentials issued for that purpose.

See also  'It's too bad' - US President Trump rules out third term bid

He added that all activities carried out on the portal were electronically recorded and could be verified through the commission’s records and audit trail.

“It is, therefore, possible to establish objectively the history and source of entries relating to any candidate whose name appears on the portal,” Oketola said.

He said the allegation that INEC officials introduced or “smuggled” candidates into the NDC’s list should therefore not be determined through speculation, noting that the electronic and documentary records would establish what transpired.

Oketola also clarified the distinction between INEC’s responsibility to monitor political party primaries and the responsibility of parties to nominate and submit their candidates.

He said the monitoring of a party primary by INEC officials did not amount to the commission nominating a candidate for the party.

“Neither does a report made by officials who monitor a primary confer upon the commission the power to choose a candidate for the political party,” he said.

He explained that the monitoring process was undertaken for statutory purposes and did not transfer the responsibility for candidate nomination from political parties to INEC.

The INEC spokesman said disputes over who validly emerged from a political party primary, the effect of an appeal arising from the primary or the validity of any subsequent attempt to alter its outcome must be resolved within the framework of the Electoral Act 2026 and other applicable laws.

“INEC cannot assume the role of a political party in choosing its candidates, nor can it disregard applicable statutory requirements governing the nomination and submission of candidates,” he stated.

On the NDC’s specific allegation that INEC officials went behind the party to obtain Form EC9 directly from individual aspirants or candidates and subsequently uploaded their particulars without the party’s authorisation, Oketola described the claim as particularly serious.

See also  Subsidy row: APC attacks Atiku’s plan, ADC demands account for N15.8tn

He, however, said the allegation could be objectively verified from the commission’s electronic and documentary records.

“Rather than make categorical assertions on matters that can readily be established from those records, the commission will examine the relevant records relating to the constituencies identified by the NDC,” he said.

Oketola urged the NDC to provide the commission with evidence and details of any officials allegedly involved in unauthorised interference with its candidate nomination process.

He said any credible allegation of misconduct against an INEC official would be investigated in accordance with established procedures.

The commission, he stressed, had no institutional interest in the choice of candidates fielded by any political party.

“Its responsibility is to administer the electoral process impartially and in accordance with the constitution, the Electoral Act and applicable regulations and guidelines,” he said.

Oketola also reminded political parties of their responsibility to ensure that their nomination processes, internal appeals, submission of candidates and use of the commission’s candidate nomination portal complied with the law and prescribed timelines.

He assured stakeholders that INEC would continue to handle the candidate nomination process transparently and impartially, adding that legitimate concerns would be addressed on the basis of the Commission’s records and applicable law.

“The Commission will neither nominate candidates for political parties nor lend itself to the imposition of candidates on any political party,” Oketola said.

Recall that the NDC, in a post on X, formerly Twitter, had accused INEC and its officials of uploading and publishing unauthorised names in some constituencies in Anambra State.

See also  How Party Crises, Electoral Commission, Tinubu, Atiku, Obi, Wike Will Shape 2026

According to the party, nine names unknown to it, and not authorised or submitted to INEC, were uploaded and published as its candidates for some constituencies in the Anambra State House of Assembly.

The NDC National Chairman, Moses Cleopas, said the development was particularly disturbing because Anambra is the home state of the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

The party alleged that INEC had systematically removed its nominated candidates for the 2027 general elections and replaced them with names not recognised by the party.

The names listed by the NDC as having been allegedly smuggled into its candidate list include: Onitsha South 1 — Umennaajiego Jude Ezenwa, Onitsha South 2 — Akpotue Obinna Chibuike, Orumba North — Nwankwo Chiemerie, Anaocha 1 — Maduagwu Eric K, Idemili North — Ngoebisi Obinna, Njikoka 1 — Isintume Charles, Nnewi South — Nwachukwu Nonso, Nnewi South 2 — Okeke Ifeanyi Akunne, Ayamelum — Nnonyelu Samson E, Dunukofia – Azotani Chuks Francis.

The statement, signed by Cleopas, called on the INEC chairman to investigate the matter and determine how the names came to be published as candidates of the party.

“We call on the INEC chairman to urgently and immediately cause an investigation into the matter and unravel how this came to be,” it said.

The NDC said the investigation should also cover other constituencies across the country, including Benue and Imo states, where it claimed to have observed a similar pattern of authentic party candidates being replaced with what it described as INEC-chosen imposters.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

APM postpones Makinde/Daura presidential campaign office unveiling

Published

on

The Allied People’s Movement has changed the date for the official unveiling of the Makinde/Daura Presidential Campaign Office from the earlier announced date of Thursday, September 3, 2026, to Monday, September 7, 2026.

The National Publicity Secretary of the party, Abubakar Yusuf, stated this in a statement on Tuesday, according to the Special Adviser (Media) to the Oyo State Governor, Dr Sulaimon Olanrewaju.

The statement noted that the event would hold at the Makinde/Daura Presidential Campaign Office, 43 Agadez Street, Wuse 2, Abuja, by 11am.

It read in part: “The APM urges all our leaders, critical stakeholders and teeming members to note this change of date and be guided accordingly.

“We sincerely regret the inconveniences caused by this change of date.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  How Party Crises, Electoral Commission, Tinubu, Atiku, Obi, Wike Will Shape 2026
Continue Reading

Politics

Ex-APC presidential aspirant withdraws from active politics

Published

on

A former presidential aspirant of the All Progressives Congress, Adamu Garba, has announced his withdrawal from active political participation.

Garba made this known in a statement posted on his X handle on Tuesday, saying he would focus exclusively on his technology company.

He said his decision followed “careful reflection” and was driven by the demands of his responsibilities as head of the business.

“To my friends, associates, party leaders, supporters and the general public, after careful reflection, I write to formally announce my decision to scale down all politically related activities and to focus exclusively on my responsibilities as Executive Chairman of IPI Group Limited and Chief Platform Architect of the Group and all its subsidiaries,” Garba said.

According to him, the work required his “sustained personal attention, technical depth and a presence that cannot be delegated.”

“In all honesty, they cannot be carried alongside heavy political participation without one or the other suffering.

“I have therefore chosen to give my full and exclusive attention to the development of our AI-First enterprise, and to the work of strengthening our community and our society through technology, for the greater good of all, and for the benefit of the future of our country and our continent,” the former presidential aspirant said.

He added, “I am deeply grateful for the interest, the invitations and the collective support I have received throughout my political journey over the past nine years. That season shaped me, and I do not take lightly the confidence that was placed in me.”

See also  Subsidy row: APC attacks Atiku’s plan, ADC demands account for N15.8tn

Garba declared interest in the 2019 presidential race under the All Progressives Congress, emphasising structural reforms, youth inclusion and national integration.

He continued as an APC presidential aspirant ahead of the 2023 elections.

In 2022, he withdrew from the APC contest, citing the high cost of expression-of-interest and nomination forms, which were pegged at N100m, and concerns that the cost would commercialise politics and exclude young and less-wealthy contenders.

His campaign had raised about N83.2m in donations, which he said would be returned.

Throughout the subsequent years, Garba remained publicly associated with the APC.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku, Obi absent as opposition begins single-candidate talks ahead of 2027

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar, and his Nigeria Democratic Congress counterpart, Peter Obi, were absent on Monday as opposition parties and presidential candidates opened fresh negotiations in Abuja on the possibility of presenting a single candidate against the ruling All Progressives Congress in the 2027 presidential election.

The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi.
The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Photo: X | Peter Obi.

The summit, convened by the G-100 political pressure group at the Yar’Adua Centre, brought together representatives of six opposition parties — the ADC, Allied Peoples Movement, NDC, Peoples Democratic Party, Peoples Redemption Party and Social Democratic Party.

Among those present were the PRP presidential candidate, Donald Duke; SDP presidential candidate, Adewale Adebayo; Democratic Leadership Alliance candidate, Moses Olusoji; and APM vice-presidential candidate, Lawan Daura, alongside other party leaders and stakeholders.

The absence of Atiku and Obi was not explained at the meeting. However, a source familiar with the discussions said the two leading opposition figures were watching the process closely and were likely to take a position after assessing the framework being developed by the G-100 organisers.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, said the emergence of the G-100 after the various parties had already produced their presidential candidates could make the negotiations particularly difficult.

“While the goal of the G-100 is laudable, Atiku is perhaps thinking that they started quite late. He is in support of every legitimate strategy to unseat the APC-led government, but the fact that the group emerged after the parties had produced their respective presidential candidates didn’t make the work easier.

“The argument is, who will be willing to step down at this point in time? These are what I think Atiku is looking at at the moment, but I am not speaking for him,” the source said.

On Obi, the source said his absence was also understandable given the political calculations surrounding the reported alliance between the former Anambra State governor and ex-Kano State governor, Rabiu Kwankwaso.

“As for Obi, I would have been surprised to see him here. Unless others agree to put aside their ambition in support of the Obi/Kwankwaso ticket, I don’t see them backing out of the race.

“However, both men are likely to attend subsequent meetings if they are sure the G-100 is on track,” he added.

Although efforts to obtain official reasons for their absence from the camps of both presidential candidates were unsuccessful, the spokesman of the House of Representatives minority caucus, Afam Ogene, said their absence should not be interpreted as a lack of support for the initiative.

See also  PHOTOS: Atiku visits Amaechi after ADC presidential primary

Ogene said Monday’s summit was primarily to lay the foundation for the process.

“It’s just the laying of structures, so the party chairmen and officials largely handled that,” he stated.

Similarly, Atiku’s media aide, Phrank Shaibu, said the former vice president’s absence was unavoidable and should not be construed as a boycott or lack of commitment to efforts aimed at strengthening opposition unity.

Shaibu said Atiku remained fully aligned with the objective of the summit and supported efforts to build a broad and disciplined opposition ahead of the 2027 election.

“His Excellency’s absence was unavoidable and should not be mischievously interpreted as a boycott or lack of commitment to opposition unity.

“He is fully aligned with the objective of the summit and has made his position clear: Nigeria urgently needs a broad, disciplined and united opposition capable of ending the hardship, insecurity and economic mismanagement of the Tinubu administration in 2027.

“Atiku’s commitment to that cause is not in doubt,” Shaibu said.

Duke on consensus

Despite the absence of two of the opposition’s most prominent presidential contenders, Donald Duke pledged to support whoever emerges from the negotiations as the opposition’s consensus candidate.

Duke, a former governor of Cross River State, said his commitment to the process was not conditional on whether he eventually emerged as the candidate.

“We will support any political party that emerges in 2027. Whatever decision is arrived at today, I will not walk away but will strive all along because that’s what the people want to see,” he said.

The summit came against the backdrop of the opposition’s failure to coordinate its votes in the 2023 presidential election.

Opening the summit, the G-100 convener, Salihu Lukman, argued that opposition parties collectively secured about 13 million votes in 2023—substantially more than the less than nine million votes recorded by the eventual winner, President Bola Tinubu—but lost the opportunity to defeat the All Progressives Congress because the votes were divided among several candidates.

“Nobody stole 13m votes. We divided them ourselves, in public, and we did it knowing exactly what the consequence would be,” Lukman said.

He urged the parties to draw lessons from the negotiations that preceded the 2015 presidential election, when opposition parties eventually formed the APC and defeated the then-ruling Peoples Democratic Party.

According to Lukman, the success of the 2015 alliance was not based on personal affection among the political actors but on an agreed process.

See also  Don’t sell your votes, Oyebamiji begs Osun voters  

“What they had was not affection. What they had was sequence. They agreed on the rules before they knew the outcome,” he said.

He said the immediate task before the opposition was therefore not to compel parties or candidates to abandon their ambitions, but to establish a structure through which competing interests could be negotiated.

“What has been missing is not analysis. It is a table,” Lukman said.

Summit’s negotiation framework

At the end of the summit, the six participating parties agreed to begin a structured negotiation process on opposition cooperation ahead of the 2027 election.

A communiqué read by Ogene stated that the parties recognised that insecurity, the rising cost of living and limited employment opportunities required political cooperation that went beyond the interests of individual parties.

The parties agreed to establish three standing coalition organs: a Central Leadership Committee, a Publicity and Communication Committee and a Legal Committee.

According to Ogene, “The Central Leadership Committee will provide political direction and coordination, while the Publicity and Communication Committee will handle joint messaging and media engagements. The Legal Committee will advise on the constitutional and legal aspects of the negotiations and draft agreements arising from the process.”

The communiqué also approved five working groups, with each participating party expected to nominate a representative to each group.

The groups are to prepare proposals on a National Covenant for Democratic Renewal, a Single-Term Transition Charter, a National Reform Programme, a Framework for Opposition Unity and a Roadmap to a Common Presidential Candidate.

The groups have four weeks to complete their assignments, after which the opposition parties will reconvene for a second summit to consider the recommendations.

Lukman stressed that the initiative was not asking any party to dissolve or any presidential candidate to withdraw immediately.

“It is not asking any party to dissolve. It is not asking any party to disappear into another party. It is not asking any candidate to stand down this morning,” he stated.

Rather, he said the objective was to create an agreed mechanism for negotiating the interests and demands of the different parties before a final decision was taken on the presidential ticket.

G-100 four-year proposal

The summit also proposed a four-year transition arrangement as part of its broader political reform agenda.

The proposal is contained in the Single-Term Transition Charter to be developed by one of the five working groups. It forms part of the G-100’s plan for what it described as a “Government of National Competence” and a four-year National Reset Programme.

However, the summit’s communiqué did not provide further details on how the proposed four-year transition would operate or whether it would require constitutional amendments.

See also  Subsidy row: APC attacks Atiku’s plan, ADC demands account for N15.8tn

The opposition parties also called for greater transparency and public accountability among persons occupying the highest offices in the country.

In a resolution that could trigger further political controversy, the G-100 called on the United States Government to process and lawfully disclose all non-exempt official records concerning President Bola Tinubu that are of legitimate public interest, subject to applicable law and ongoing judicial proceedings in the United States.

The communiqué specifically referenced Freedom of Information Act proceedings before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. It, however, stressed that the demand did not presume the contents of any undisclosed records or amount to a finding of wrongdoing.

The G-100 also said it would communicate its position to the ECOWAS Commission and other relevant Community institutions, seeking diplomatic and institutional engagement on transparency and public accountability.

According to Lukman, “Someone will have to accept an outcome he did not want.”

He acknowledged that the search for a single opposition candidate would inevitably require some political actors to make sacrifices.

“There is no version of this that costs nobody anything. Someone in this hall will have to accept an outcome he/she did not want. That is what unity is. It is not a communiqué. It is somebody’s disappointment, borne well,” he said.

The group said its ultimate objective was not merely to create another electoral alliance but to provide Nigerians with a credible alternative to the ruling party.

“Our only interest is the one stated in the Doctrine we published in August, which is that a democracy is sustained not merely by holding elections, but by the credible possibility of an alternative government.

“Today, that possibility is in this room. It is in nobody else’s hands,” Lukman declared.

The latest initiative comes as opposition parties intensify efforts to avoid a repeat of the 2023 presidential election, when votes were split among Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Kwankwaso and other candidates, allowing the APC’s Tinubu to emerge with a plurality rather than a majority of the total votes cast.

With the major opposition parties already divided over their presidential ambitions, the immediate challenge for the G-100 will be to persuade the leading candidates and their parties to accept a transparent process capable of determining who eventually flies a common opposition ticket in 2027.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending