Connect with us

News

See why Trump hammered hard on Nigeria again!

Published

on

United States President Donald Trump has designated Nigeria  “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged genocide of Christians.

The new designation comes barely three months after Washington imposed tough visa restrictions on Nigerians, limiting most travel visas to single-entry, three-month validity.

Trump, who made the latest announcement on Friday via a post on his Truth Social platform, which was also shared on the official White House X handle, said Nigeria was facing an “existential threat” to Christianity.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter,” the US President wrote.

“I am hereby making Nigeria a ‘Country of Particular Concern.’ But that is the least of it. When Christians, or any such group, are slaughtered like is happening in Nigeria (3,100 versus 4,476 worldwide), something must be done!”

He directed Congressman Riley Moore and Chairman Tom Cole of the House Appropriations Committee to immediately investigate the alleged killings and report back to him.

“The United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria and numerous other countries. We stand ready, willing, and able to save our great Christian population around the world,” he wrote.

Trump renews old charge

The move rekindles a storm that first erupted in December 2020, when Trump, in his first term, designated Nigeria as a CPC under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1998.

The listing, which cited “systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom,” was later reversed by the former President Joe Biden in November 2021.

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken had argued that while Nigeria faced severe security challenges, the government was not “directly engaged” in religious persecution.

By reintroducing the tag, Trump’s government is effectively declaring that the situation has worsened, and that the Federal Government has failed to act decisively to stop violence targeting Christians and minority faiths.

Pressure from Capitol Hill

Trump’s decision follows months of agitation by American lawmakers and evangelical groups.

In September 2025, Republican Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025 (S.2747), which seeks to reinstate Nigeria’s CPC status and impose sanctions on culpable government officials.

The bill, co-sponsored by five Republican senators, including Ted Budd, cites the “systematic persecution of Christians and other religious minorities” by Boko Haram, Islamic State in West Africa Province, and Fulani militants.

See also  Oyo abduction: NUT strike begins as Tinubu sends 1,000 forest guards

The lawmakers alleged that more than 52,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, while over 20,000 churches and Christian institutions have been destroyed or attacked.

The proposed law also mandates the US State Department to submit annual reports to Congress on Nigeria’s human rights record and to recommend visa bans or financial sanctions where violations persist.

Representative Riley Moore, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also sent a letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, urging “immediate action” to address what he called the “systematic persecution and slaughter of Christians in Nigeria.”

“You have always been a champion for Christians around the world,” Moore said, thanking Trump for his “leadership” and commitment to defend believers “being slaughtered by radical Islamists.”

What is CPC?

According to the US Department of State, the Country of Particular Concern designation is applied to nations that engage in or tolerate “particularly severe violations of religious freedom.”

Such violations include torture, prolonged detention, enforced disappearance, or denial of life and liberty on religious grounds.

The CPC label empowers the US President to apply or waive punitive measures, including sanctions, diplomatic isolation, or withdrawal of aid, depending on strategic or humanitarian considerations.

Currently, countries such as China, Iran, Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Eritrea are also listed.

While the designation is primarily symbolic, it carries reputational and economic consequences.

Analysts say it can affect Nigeria’s investment attractiveness, bilateral defence partnerships, and access to certain aid programs.

Visa policy twist deepens chill

Friday’s move comes barely months after the US Embassy in Abuja announced a reduction in visa validity and entry privileges for Nigerian citizens.

Under the revised policy, most non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas were downgraded to single-entry, three-month validity — a sharp contrast to the previous two-year multiple-entry regime.

The embassy explained that the measure was part of Washington’s global visa reciprocity process, designed to align visa benefits with how other nations treat American citizens.

In its statement, the embassy said the new rules were “subject to periodic review” and could be eased if Nigeria met criteria such as secure passport issuance, reduced overstay rates, and improved data sharing with U.S. authorities.

See also  Drama as APC committee screens Fubara, Wike allies ahead of 2027 Rivers governorship

However, the timing of the visa cut, now followed by the CPC designation, has fueled speculation of a broader diplomatic downgrade.

US lawmakers hail Trump’s move

Trump’s latest decision has drawn mixed reactions across political and religious circles, both in America and Nigeria.

US Senator for North Carolina, Ted Budd, hailed the decision as “a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities.”

He wrote on X, “President Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern is a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities. I am grateful to @POTUS and @SecRubio for their swift actions against terrorism and religious persecution.”

Also, Representative Marlin Stutzman commended Trump for the move, saying it was long overdue.

“Thank you @POTUS for labeling Nigeria as a COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN! Christians are being relentlessly tortured and murdered, and this is a much-needed first step,” he posted.

Stutzman said he was working with lawmakers, including Senators Ted Cruz and Tom Cole, to “save lives in Nigeria.”

Also, a congressman for South Michigan, John James, thanked Trump for standing up for “persecuted Christians in Nigeria and around the world.”

“Last year, as Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Africa Subcommittee, I demanded answers and actions from the Biden administration. While Biden chose silence and to not designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, President Trump did what Biden failed to,” he added.

But a former Texas mayor, Mike Arnold, cautioned that the designation alone would not end the killings.

He wrote, “It is only a tool. Christians will still be slaughtered, and millions remain displaced. This designation will not affect the north directly, only Abuja — and that’s a great place to start. This is the beginning, not the end. Let’s celebrate today, then gird up for the real work of restoration.”

Nigerians divided over designation

In Nigeria, reactions were divided.

A former Kaduna Central senator, Shehu Sani, faulted the move and questioned US moral consistency.

He wrote, “Haiti is not a communist or terrorist country. It’s simply the poorest in the Western Hemisphere, next to the richest nation on earth. Where is the morality of your generosity and power when your friendly neighbour is poor, hungry, and wretched?”

See also  INEC trains staff to tackle misinformation ahead of 2027 elections

The International Secretary of the Ecumenical Synods of Bishops, Archbishops, Apostles and Senior Clergy in London, Archbishop Osazee Williams, welcomed the designation but warned against framing it purely as a “Christian genocide.”

He told Saturday PUNCH, “It is good that he declared Nigeria a country of particular concern, but branding it as Christian genocide brings a dangerous divide. During the Boko Haram crisis, Muslims were also victims. If Muslims were not killed, it would be easier to call it Christian persecution. There are systematic killings, yes, but every soul matters. The declaration should be about insecurity and loss of life generally, not just about religion.”

Also, a former presidential aide, Bashir Ahmad, warned that the decision by Trump to redesignate Nigeria as a CPC would have serious implications for the nation’s counterterrorism operations.

Reacting to the development in a post via his X handle, Ahmad expressed concern that the move could disrupt Nigeria’s long-standing military partnership with the United States, particularly in the area of weapons procurement and counterinsurgency support.

“Finally, some of our own countrymen, with the help of certain US officials, have landed us in this mess,” Ahmad said.

He lamented that the redesignation could result in sanctions that would affect the country’s ability to acquire sophisticated arms needed to combat terrorism.

“Nigeria has almost solely relied on the United States in its fight against terrorism, purchasing the majority of its sophisticated weapons from them. Now, with the new sanctions, how are we supposed to effectively confront the very same terrorists committing these atrocities?” he asked

At the State House, a senior aide to the President, who asked not to be named because he was not authorised to speak publicly, said the Federal Government would use “all diplomatic instruments and avenues” to address the issue.

He said, “We will employ all diplomatic instruments and avenues to ensure that both countries are on the same page on this matter. We believe we will survive this phase.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Nigerians top list of asylum seekers in Ireland

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Senate approves Tinubu’s request to deploy troops in Benin

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Trump’s statement opportunity to end killings in Nigeria — Northern CAN

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Festac DPO, Matilda Ngbaronye, Dies in Lagos Hospital

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Declare Diri’s seat vacant over PDP resignation, Kenneth Okonkwo urges INEC

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Nigerians top list of asylum seekers in Ireland

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending