Connect with us

News

See why Trump hammered hard on Nigeria again!

Published

on

United States President Donald Trump has designated Nigeria  “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged genocide of Christians.

The new designation comes barely three months after Washington imposed tough visa restrictions on Nigerians, limiting most travel visas to single-entry, three-month validity.

Trump, who made the latest announcement on Friday via a post on his Truth Social platform, which was also shared on the official White House X handle, said Nigeria was facing an “existential threat” to Christianity.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter,” the US President wrote.

“I am hereby making Nigeria a ‘Country of Particular Concern.’ But that is the least of it. When Christians, or any such group, are slaughtered like is happening in Nigeria (3,100 versus 4,476 worldwide), something must be done!”

He directed Congressman Riley Moore and Chairman Tom Cole of the House Appropriations Committee to immediately investigate the alleged killings and report back to him.

“The United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria and numerous other countries. We stand ready, willing, and able to save our great Christian population around the world,” he wrote.

Trump renews old charge

The move rekindles a storm that first erupted in December 2020, when Trump, in his first term, designated Nigeria as a CPC under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1998.

The listing, which cited “systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom,” was later reversed by the former President Joe Biden in November 2021.

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken had argued that while Nigeria faced severe security challenges, the government was not “directly engaged” in religious persecution.

By reintroducing the tag, Trump’s government is effectively declaring that the situation has worsened, and that the Federal Government has failed to act decisively to stop violence targeting Christians and minority faiths.

Pressure from Capitol Hill

Trump’s decision follows months of agitation by American lawmakers and evangelical groups.

In September 2025, Republican Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025 (S.2747), which seeks to reinstate Nigeria’s CPC status and impose sanctions on culpable government officials.

The bill, co-sponsored by five Republican senators, including Ted Budd, cites the “systematic persecution of Christians and other religious minorities” by Boko Haram, Islamic State in West Africa Province, and Fulani militants.

See also  Fuel war brews as Dangote presses Tinubu to ban imports

The lawmakers alleged that more than 52,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, while over 20,000 churches and Christian institutions have been destroyed or attacked.

The proposed law also mandates the US State Department to submit annual reports to Congress on Nigeria’s human rights record and to recommend visa bans or financial sanctions where violations persist.

Representative Riley Moore, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also sent a letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, urging “immediate action” to address what he called the “systematic persecution and slaughter of Christians in Nigeria.”

“You have always been a champion for Christians around the world,” Moore said, thanking Trump for his “leadership” and commitment to defend believers “being slaughtered by radical Islamists.”

What is CPC?

According to the US Department of State, the Country of Particular Concern designation is applied to nations that engage in or tolerate “particularly severe violations of religious freedom.”

Such violations include torture, prolonged detention, enforced disappearance, or denial of life and liberty on religious grounds.

The CPC label empowers the US President to apply or waive punitive measures, including sanctions, diplomatic isolation, or withdrawal of aid, depending on strategic or humanitarian considerations.

Currently, countries such as China, Iran, Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Eritrea are also listed.

While the designation is primarily symbolic, it carries reputational and economic consequences.

Analysts say it can affect Nigeria’s investment attractiveness, bilateral defence partnerships, and access to certain aid programs.

Visa policy twist deepens chill

Friday’s move comes barely months after the US Embassy in Abuja announced a reduction in visa validity and entry privileges for Nigerian citizens.

Under the revised policy, most non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas were downgraded to single-entry, three-month validity — a sharp contrast to the previous two-year multiple-entry regime.

The embassy explained that the measure was part of Washington’s global visa reciprocity process, designed to align visa benefits with how other nations treat American citizens.

In its statement, the embassy said the new rules were “subject to periodic review” and could be eased if Nigeria met criteria such as secure passport issuance, reduced overstay rates, and improved data sharing with U.S. authorities.

See also  Obi, Kwankwaso lead NDC’s battle against deregistration

However, the timing of the visa cut, now followed by the CPC designation, has fueled speculation of a broader diplomatic downgrade.

US lawmakers hail Trump’s move

Trump’s latest decision has drawn mixed reactions across political and religious circles, both in America and Nigeria.

US Senator for North Carolina, Ted Budd, hailed the decision as “a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities.”

He wrote on X, “President Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern is a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities. I am grateful to @POTUS and @SecRubio for their swift actions against terrorism and religious persecution.”

Also, Representative Marlin Stutzman commended Trump for the move, saying it was long overdue.

“Thank you @POTUS for labeling Nigeria as a COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN! Christians are being relentlessly tortured and murdered, and this is a much-needed first step,” he posted.

Stutzman said he was working with lawmakers, including Senators Ted Cruz and Tom Cole, to “save lives in Nigeria.”

Also, a congressman for South Michigan, John James, thanked Trump for standing up for “persecuted Christians in Nigeria and around the world.”

“Last year, as Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Africa Subcommittee, I demanded answers and actions from the Biden administration. While Biden chose silence and to not designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, President Trump did what Biden failed to,” he added.

But a former Texas mayor, Mike Arnold, cautioned that the designation alone would not end the killings.

He wrote, “It is only a tool. Christians will still be slaughtered, and millions remain displaced. This designation will not affect the north directly, only Abuja — and that’s a great place to start. This is the beginning, not the end. Let’s celebrate today, then gird up for the real work of restoration.”

Nigerians divided over designation

In Nigeria, reactions were divided.

A former Kaduna Central senator, Shehu Sani, faulted the move and questioned US moral consistency.

He wrote, “Haiti is not a communist or terrorist country. It’s simply the poorest in the Western Hemisphere, next to the richest nation on earth. Where is the morality of your generosity and power when your friendly neighbour is poor, hungry, and wretched?”

See also  Big diplomatic overhaul: Tinubu’s 65 envoy picks brace for Senate storm

The International Secretary of the Ecumenical Synods of Bishops, Archbishops, Apostles and Senior Clergy in London, Archbishop Osazee Williams, welcomed the designation but warned against framing it purely as a “Christian genocide.”

He told Saturday PUNCH, “It is good that he declared Nigeria a country of particular concern, but branding it as Christian genocide brings a dangerous divide. During the Boko Haram crisis, Muslims were also victims. If Muslims were not killed, it would be easier to call it Christian persecution. There are systematic killings, yes, but every soul matters. The declaration should be about insecurity and loss of life generally, not just about religion.”

Also, a former presidential aide, Bashir Ahmad, warned that the decision by Trump to redesignate Nigeria as a CPC would have serious implications for the nation’s counterterrorism operations.

Reacting to the development in a post via his X handle, Ahmad expressed concern that the move could disrupt Nigeria’s long-standing military partnership with the United States, particularly in the area of weapons procurement and counterinsurgency support.

“Finally, some of our own countrymen, with the help of certain US officials, have landed us in this mess,” Ahmad said.

He lamented that the redesignation could result in sanctions that would affect the country’s ability to acquire sophisticated arms needed to combat terrorism.

“Nigeria has almost solely relied on the United States in its fight against terrorism, purchasing the majority of its sophisticated weapons from them. Now, with the new sanctions, how are we supposed to effectively confront the very same terrorists committing these atrocities?” he asked

At the State House, a senior aide to the President, who asked not to be named because he was not authorised to speak publicly, said the Federal Government would use “all diplomatic instruments and avenues” to address the issue.

He said, “We will employ all diplomatic instruments and avenues to ensure that both countries are on the same page on this matter. We believe we will survive this phase.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Pay more attention to health, education, TUC tells Diri

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  #FreeNnamdiKanu: Protest wave hits Abuja, paralyses S’East states

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  Big diplomatic overhaul: Tinubu’s 65 envoy picks brace for Senate storm

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Pay more attention to health, education, TUC tells Diri

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Bandits attacked Kwara community for 10 hours before soldiers arrived – Village head

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  Access Holdings appoints Innocent Ike new GMD/CEO

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Atiku meets ADC South-East leaders ahead of primaries

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  INEC RECs risk two-year jail term over rigging

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending