Connect with us

News

See why Trump hammered hard on Nigeria again!

Published

on

United States President Donald Trump has designated Nigeria  “Country of Particular Concern” over alleged genocide of Christians.

The new designation comes barely three months after Washington imposed tough visa restrictions on Nigerians, limiting most travel visas to single-entry, three-month validity.

Trump, who made the latest announcement on Friday via a post on his Truth Social platform, which was also shared on the official White House X handle, said Nigeria was facing an “existential threat” to Christianity.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter,” the US President wrote.

“I am hereby making Nigeria a ‘Country of Particular Concern.’ But that is the least of it. When Christians, or any such group, are slaughtered like is happening in Nigeria (3,100 versus 4,476 worldwide), something must be done!”

He directed Congressman Riley Moore and Chairman Tom Cole of the House Appropriations Committee to immediately investigate the alleged killings and report back to him.

“The United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria and numerous other countries. We stand ready, willing, and able to save our great Christian population around the world,” he wrote.

Trump renews old charge

The move rekindles a storm that first erupted in December 2020, when Trump, in his first term, designated Nigeria as a CPC under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1998.

The listing, which cited “systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom,” was later reversed by the former President Joe Biden in November 2021.

Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken had argued that while Nigeria faced severe security challenges, the government was not “directly engaged” in religious persecution.

By reintroducing the tag, Trump’s government is effectively declaring that the situation has worsened, and that the Federal Government has failed to act decisively to stop violence targeting Christians and minority faiths.

Pressure from Capitol Hill

Trump’s decision follows months of agitation by American lawmakers and evangelical groups.

In September 2025, Republican Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom Accountability Act of 2025 (S.2747), which seeks to reinstate Nigeria’s CPC status and impose sanctions on culpable government officials.

The bill, co-sponsored by five Republican senators, including Ted Budd, cites the “systematic persecution of Christians and other religious minorities” by Boko Haram, Islamic State in West Africa Province, and Fulani militants.

See also  Abia inaugurates health centre, 31 buildings donated by indigene

The lawmakers alleged that more than 52,000 Christians have been killed in Nigeria since 2009, while over 20,000 churches and Christian institutions have been destroyed or attacked.

The proposed law also mandates the US State Department to submit annual reports to Congress on Nigeria’s human rights record and to recommend visa bans or financial sanctions where violations persist.

Representative Riley Moore, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also sent a letter to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, urging “immediate action” to address what he called the “systematic persecution and slaughter of Christians in Nigeria.”

“You have always been a champion for Christians around the world,” Moore said, thanking Trump for his “leadership” and commitment to defend believers “being slaughtered by radical Islamists.”

What is CPC?

According to the US Department of State, the Country of Particular Concern designation is applied to nations that engage in or tolerate “particularly severe violations of religious freedom.”

Such violations include torture, prolonged detention, enforced disappearance, or denial of life and liberty on religious grounds.

The CPC label empowers the US President to apply or waive punitive measures, including sanctions, diplomatic isolation, or withdrawal of aid, depending on strategic or humanitarian considerations.

Currently, countries such as China, Iran, Russia, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Eritrea are also listed.

While the designation is primarily symbolic, it carries reputational and economic consequences.

Analysts say it can affect Nigeria’s investment attractiveness, bilateral defence partnerships, and access to certain aid programs.

Visa policy twist deepens chill

Friday’s move comes barely months after the US Embassy in Abuja announced a reduction in visa validity and entry privileges for Nigerian citizens.

Under the revised policy, most non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas were downgraded to single-entry, three-month validity — a sharp contrast to the previous two-year multiple-entry regime.

The embassy explained that the measure was part of Washington’s global visa reciprocity process, designed to align visa benefits with how other nations treat American citizens.

In its statement, the embassy said the new rules were “subject to periodic review” and could be eased if Nigeria met criteria such as secure passport issuance, reduced overstay rates, and improved data sharing with U.S. authorities.

See also  PHOTOS: Four children d!e, others injured as vehicle plunges into stream in Benue

However, the timing of the visa cut, now followed by the CPC designation, has fueled speculation of a broader diplomatic downgrade.

US lawmakers hail Trump’s move

Trump’s latest decision has drawn mixed reactions across political and religious circles, both in America and Nigeria.

US Senator for North Carolina, Ted Budd, hailed the decision as “a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities.”

He wrote on X, “President Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern is a necessary response to the brutal slaughtering of Christians and religious minorities. I am grateful to @POTUS and @SecRubio for their swift actions against terrorism and religious persecution.”

Also, Representative Marlin Stutzman commended Trump for the move, saying it was long overdue.

“Thank you @POTUS for labeling Nigeria as a COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN! Christians are being relentlessly tortured and murdered, and this is a much-needed first step,” he posted.

Stutzman said he was working with lawmakers, including Senators Ted Cruz and Tom Cole, to “save lives in Nigeria.”

Also, a congressman for South Michigan, John James, thanked Trump for standing up for “persecuted Christians in Nigeria and around the world.”

“Last year, as Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Africa Subcommittee, I demanded answers and actions from the Biden administration. While Biden chose silence and to not designate Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, President Trump did what Biden failed to,” he added.

But a former Texas mayor, Mike Arnold, cautioned that the designation alone would not end the killings.

He wrote, “It is only a tool. Christians will still be slaughtered, and millions remain displaced. This designation will not affect the north directly, only Abuja — and that’s a great place to start. This is the beginning, not the end. Let’s celebrate today, then gird up for the real work of restoration.”

Nigerians divided over designation

In Nigeria, reactions were divided.

A former Kaduna Central senator, Shehu Sani, faulted the move and questioned US moral consistency.

He wrote, “Haiti is not a communist or terrorist country. It’s simply the poorest in the Western Hemisphere, next to the richest nation on earth. Where is the morality of your generosity and power when your friendly neighbour is poor, hungry, and wretched?”

See also  Nationwide alert: FG warns of five-day flooding in 19 states

The International Secretary of the Ecumenical Synods of Bishops, Archbishops, Apostles and Senior Clergy in London, Archbishop Osazee Williams, welcomed the designation but warned against framing it purely as a “Christian genocide.”

He told Saturday PUNCH, “It is good that he declared Nigeria a country of particular concern, but branding it as Christian genocide brings a dangerous divide. During the Boko Haram crisis, Muslims were also victims. If Muslims were not killed, it would be easier to call it Christian persecution. There are systematic killings, yes, but every soul matters. The declaration should be about insecurity and loss of life generally, not just about religion.”

Also, a former presidential aide, Bashir Ahmad, warned that the decision by Trump to redesignate Nigeria as a CPC would have serious implications for the nation’s counterterrorism operations.

Reacting to the development in a post via his X handle, Ahmad expressed concern that the move could disrupt Nigeria’s long-standing military partnership with the United States, particularly in the area of weapons procurement and counterinsurgency support.

“Finally, some of our own countrymen, with the help of certain US officials, have landed us in this mess,” Ahmad said.

He lamented that the redesignation could result in sanctions that would affect the country’s ability to acquire sophisticated arms needed to combat terrorism.

“Nigeria has almost solely relied on the United States in its fight against terrorism, purchasing the majority of its sophisticated weapons from them. Now, with the new sanctions, how are we supposed to effectively confront the very same terrorists committing these atrocities?” he asked

At the State House, a senior aide to the President, who asked not to be named because he was not authorised to speak publicly, said the Federal Government would use “all diplomatic instruments and avenues” to address the issue.

He said, “We will employ all diplomatic instruments and avenues to ensure that both countries are on the same page on this matter. We believe we will survive this phase.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Pentagon restores name of US Pacific Command

Published

on

The Pentagon is set to restore the name of the US Indo-Pacific Command to the US Pacific Command, it said on Tuesday, reversing a 2018 decision.

The renaming will not change the command’s area of responsibility, which stretches from the western part of India to America’s Pacific coastline, the Department of War said in a statement.

Its “fundamental mission and its unwavering commitment to maintaining a free and open theatre alongside regional allies and partners” also remain unchanged, it added.

The name change “honours the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific,” the department said, without giving additional details.

The US Pacific Command was established by former President Harry Truman after World War II.

It operated under that name for over 70 years before being renamed as the US Indo-Pacific Command in 2018, in a nod to the growing importance of the Indian Ocean in US strategic thinking.

The 2018 name change also came as part of broader efforts by Washington to counter China’s growing influence across the Asia-Pacific domain.

AFP

See also  Remi Tinubu gives grants to persons with disabilities in Sokoto
Continue Reading

News

Labour to engage FG on minimum wage review

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress said they will restart negotiations with the Federal Government over a new national minimum wage, warning that workers can no longer cope with rising living costs as inflation continues to erode real incomes.

The unions are pushing for what they described as a “genuine living wage” to replace the current framework, which they said no longer reflects Nigeria’s economic realities, particularly sharp increases in food, transport, housing, and healthcare costs.

The position was contained in a joint address delivered at the 114th International Labour Conference in Geneva on Monday, where the unions also rejected any proposal to tax the minimum wage or impose additional fiscal burdens on low-income earners.

Nigeria’s current minimum wage of N70,000 was signed into law on 18 July 2024, in an agreement between organised labour and the federal government. President Bola Tinubu formally announced the wage on 19 July 2024, and it took effect on 29 July 2024.

The agreement originally set a three-year review cycle, shifting from the previous five-year arrangement. However, in January 2025, the Federal Government adjusted the framework, announcing that the minimum wage would now be reviewed every two years, effectively setting 2026 as the next review point.

In light of this, labour leaders said they intend to formally open discussions with the federal government ahead of the July 2026 wage renegotiation deadline, in a bid to prevent the delays that have often hindered previous minimum wage reviews.

“The current Act expires early next year, and we have announced that renegotiation will commence by July 2026 to avoid the painful delays of the past. As soon as we leave here, we shall write again to the government demanding the commencement of the process for renegotiating the national minimum wage,” the unions said.

See also  ASUU protest rocks campuses ahead of FG talks

The labour leaders said workers are already under severe pressure from inflation, currency depreciation, and rising costs across essential services, arguing that official economic indicators do not reflect the daily realities of most households.

They warned that taxing the minimum wage would worsen poverty and deepen economic hardship at a time when many citizens are struggling to meet basic needs.

“We demand nothing less than a genuine living wage that reflects today’s harsh economic realities. We also demand immediate relief measures by governments at all levels until a new minimum wage is signed into law. We reject outright any attempt to tax the minimum wage or impose further burdens on the poor,” the unions said in their communiqué.

The unions stressed that the upcoming negotiations must go beyond nominal wage adjustments and instead focus on protecting real incomes, which they said have been steadily eroded by inflation.

They also urged federal and state governments to introduce short-term relief measures pending the conclusion of negotiations, warning that delays could heighten industrial tensions across the country.

Beyond wage concerns, the labour movement used the Geneva platform to highlight broader economic and social challenges, including insecurity, unemployment, and rising poverty levels.

They said insecurity in several parts of the country has made commuting increasingly dangerous for workers, with killings, abductions, and displacement affecting productivity and livelihoods.

According to the unions, nearly 2,000 people were killed in the first quarter of the year, while millions have been displaced, with entire communities and economic activities disrupted by violence.

See also  Iran not planning to attend talks with US in Pakistan

They warned that worsening insecurity could force workers to remain at home as a survival response, escalating tensions beyond traditional labour action if not urgently addressed.

The labour leaders also said about 65 per cent of Nigerians, estimated at roughly 150 million people, are currently living in multidimensional poverty, driven by inflation, job losses, and declining purchasing power.

They argued that while macroeconomic reforms are aimed at stabilisation, they have yet to translate into improved living standards for ordinary citizens.

As the 2027 general elections approach, the unions said they are developing a charter of demands to shape their engagement with political actors and inform their support for candidates, noting that  only political actors who commit to improved security, functional public services, wage reforms, and protection of labour rights would receive their backing.

The labour movement also raised concerns over alleged interference in union affairs in some states, accusing certain governments of undermining democratically elected labour leadership structures.

They emphasised that organised labour would resist any attempt to weaken union independence or impose external control on labour organisations.

As the current wage regime approaches its 2026 review window, the unions said their priority remains securing a wage structure that reflects economic realities and protects workers from further erosion of income.

They maintained that the outcome of the upcoming negotiations would determine whether Nigerian workers receive what they termed a “living wage” or continue to endure worsening economic hardship.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Ribadu, Akpabio advocate tech-driven border control over Insecurity

Published

on

The National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, and President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, on Tuesday called for the deployment of modern technology and stronger regional cooperation to strengthen Nigeria’s border security architecture and address growing security threats across the country.

FILE: Akpabio

They made the call at the opening of the 15th National Security Seminar organised by the Alumni Association of the National Defence College in Abuja.

Represented by the Director of Policy and Strategy at the Office of the National Security Adviser, Yazid Gbemudu, the NSA said Nigeria’s territorial integrity and national stability were closely tied to the effectiveness of its border security framework.

He noted that while Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime borders facilitated trade, regional integration and socio-economic development, they also exposed the country to threats including terrorism, arms trafficking, smuggling, human trafficking, irregular migration and other forms of transnational organised crime.

According to him, weak border governance creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited by criminal and terrorist networks, thereby undermining national security and development efforts.

“A major pillar of Nigeria’s contemporary border security framework is the National Border Management Strategy, which promotes an integrated border management approach.

“The strategy seeks to enhance intelligence collaboration, strengthen border infrastructure, improve surveillance capabilities and modernise border management processes,” he said.

Ribadu said the deployment of Border Management Information Systems and other technological solutions at key entry and exit points had improved data collection, traveller screening and migration monitoring.

“These initiatives demonstrate Nigeria’s commitment to aligning its border management practices with international standards,” he added.

See also  Iran not planning to attend talks with US in Pakistan

The NSA stressed the need for the full implementation of an integrated border management system to improve coordination among security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

“Effective intelligence sharing, joint operations and harmonised border procedures are essential for addressing contemporary security threats,” he said.

He also advocated increased investment in technology-driven border security solutions.

“Expanding surveillance systems across land, maritime and coastal borders will significantly improve monitoring capabilities and reduce illegal cross-border activities.

“Modern challenges require modern solutions, including biometric identification systems, advanced border monitoring technologies and data-driven security frameworks,” Ribadu stated.

The NSA further emphasised the importance of regional and bilateral cooperation, noting that many of the security challenges confronting Nigeria’s borders were transnational in nature and required coordinated responses among neighbouring countries.

He also called for greater investment in border communities through sustainable development, improved infrastructure and economic opportunities to reduce their vulnerability to criminal exploitation.

“Strengthening Nigeria’s border security architecture is fundamental to ensuring national stability, protecting territorial integrity and promoting socio-economic development,” he said.

Ribadu, however, acknowledged challenges such as porous borders, inadequate infrastructure, limited technological capabilities and gaps in inter-agency coordination, saying they required urgent attention.

“Border security is a shared responsibility that requires the collective efforts of security agencies, government institutions, border communities and international partners,” he added.

Speaking at the event, Akpabio, who was represented by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Defence, Ahmad Lawan, said Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime boundaries posed significant security challenges.

“As a country with extensive land and maritime boundaries, Nigeria faces significant challenges relating to border control, illegal migration, arms trafficking, smuggling and the infiltration of criminal and extremist elements.

See also  Nationwide alert: FG warns of five-day flooding in 19 states

“It is, therefore, imperative that Nigeria prioritises the strengthening of its border security architecture through improved surveillance, enhanced infrastructure, better inter-agency coordination, technological innovation and stronger regional cooperation,” he said.

Akpabio noted that many of the security threats confronting Nigeria had transnational dimensions, making coordinated responses essential.

He stressed that peace and security remained prerequisites for meaningful national development.

“There can be no meaningful development without peace and security. Porous and poorly managed borders can become vulnerabilities that undermine national security efforts and national stability,” he said.

The Senate President also advocated a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to addressing insecurity.

According to him, government institutions, security agencies, civil society organisations, the private sector, traditional institutions, the media and academia all have critical roles to play in safeguarding the country.

Earlier, the Acting President of AANDEC, Commodore Amatare Kpou (retd.), described the seminar as a key platform for promoting informed discourse on national security challenges and opportunities.

Kpou said the theme of the seminar, “Strengthening Nigeria’s Border Security Architecture for National Stability,” was timely, given the growing threats of irregular migration, smuggling, trafficking and other cross-border crimes.

He expressed confidence that the deliberations would generate useful recommendations for policymakers and contribute to efforts aimed at building a safer and more secure Nigeria.

Nigeria shares over 4,000 kilometres of land borders with neighbouring countries and an extensive coastline, making border security a critical component of national security.

Authorities have repeatedly identified porous borders as channels for terrorism, arms smuggling, human trafficking and other transnational crimes.

The Federal Government has in recent years intensified efforts to strengthen border management through technology, intelligence sharing and regional cooperation.

See also  FCT doctors begin indefinite strike

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending