Connect with us

News

21,000 unregistered refugees in Nigeria – UNHCR

Published

on

At least 21,807 foreign refugees and asylum seekers fleeing violence in neighbouring countries remain unregistered in Nigeria, denying them access to food assistance, healthcare and other essential services, the United Nations has revealed.

The figures, contained in the November 2025 UNHCR dashboard obtained by The PUNCH, show that the unregistered asylum seekers, predominantly come from Cameroon’s conflict-torn Anglophone region.

The data revealed that Nigeria currently hosts a total of 127,000 refugees and asylum seekers from 41 countries, with 21,807 still awaiting registration by the National Commission for Refugees, Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons, alongside 80,915 recognised refugees and over 25,000 asylum seekers whose cases are being processed.

Analysis of successive UNHCR dashboards reveals that the backlog of unregistered refugees has fluctuated over the past year, climbing from 21,095 in December 2024 to a peak of 32,750 in June 2025, a 55 per cent surge in six months, before declining to 21,807 by November 2025.

The March 2025 dashboard recorded 20,997 persons awaiting registration, suggesting that the new arrivals continue to outpace the Federal Government’s capacity to process them.

Unregistered refugees remain ineligible for UNHCR-provided food stipends, cash assistance, health insurance schemes, and other humanitarian aid, leaving thousands in limbo as they struggle to meet basic needs in host communities.

One official familiar with the refugee registration process told our correspondent that staffing shortages, security restrictions, and logistical challenges have slowed enrolment in Borno, Adamawa, and Cross River States, which host the bulk of new arrivals.

“Registration can take weeks or even months, depending on the state and the availability of NCFRMI personnel,” explained one field officer who spoke on condition of anonymity.

See also  PHOTOS: Sowore, others shun warnings, lead retired police officers in protest

The data shows that Cameroonians dominate Nigeria’s refugee population, accounting for 86 per cent or approximately 119,208 people fleeing the eight-year-old Anglophone crisis in Cameroon’s North-West and South-West regions.

Smaller populations originate from Niger (15,011), the Central African Republic (1,053), Syria (1,330), and the Democratic Republic of Congo (598), among others.

Women and girls account for just over half of all refugees, while children represent close to 60 per cent, according to UNHCR statistics.

Most refugees live in host communities across Cross River, Taraba, Akwa Ibom, Benue, and Adamawa States, rather than in camps.

Urban centres such as Lagos, Abuja, and Kano also shelter refugees from diverse nationalities, some of whom have been in Nigeria for over a decade.

Nigeria’s open-door policy and adherence to the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1969 Organisation of African Unity Convention require the country to grant asylum to individuals fleeing persecution and conflict.

The NCFRMI, working with the Nigerian Immigration Service and UNHCR, is responsible for registering asylum seekers and conducting Refugee Status Determination procedures, which can take three to six months.

Successful applicants receive refugee identity cards that provide access to work permits, school enrolment, and, in principle, freedom of movement beyond designated settlements.

In 2019, Nigeria began issuing Convention Travel Documents—refugee passports—to enable international travel.

However, during mass influxes, individual asylum procedures are often suspended in favour of group recognition.

In 2024, the government granted 86,000 Cameroonian refugees Temporary Protection Status valid through June 2027, while 20,000 Nigeriens in Damasak received prima facie recognition.

See also  Remi Tinubu donates ₦110m to families of 22 deceased Kano athletes

Speaking with our correspondent, a former Nigerian Ambassador to Singapore, Ogbole Amedu-Ode, warned that while Nigeria must fulfil its international obligations, border control agencies must remain vigilant against infiltrators.

“Nigeria is a signatory to the appropriate international instruments, conventions and treaties that grant favour to asylum seekers, especially those under persecution.

“We’re aware of all the people from Cameroon, where there’s some kind of civil unrest. The same goes for Sudan, Syria and parts of Lebanon. Based on those international conventions, Nigeria is obliged to admit and grant them asylum.

“However, given the security situation we face in Nigeria, the relevant agencies should have their eyes peeled to watch out for people who might be used to infiltrate the Nigerian space for any negative objectives,” Amedu-Ode told The PUNCH.

The registration backlog comes as Nigeria grapples with a broader displacement crisis.

According to the UNHCR, the country hosts 3.5 million internally displaced persons, primarily in the North-East, due to Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province insurgencies.

In 2024, severe floods affected over 480,000 people in 34 of Nigeria’s 36 states, including tens of thousands in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe, further straining humanitarian resources.

Meanwhile, nearly 408,000 Nigerian refugees remain registered in neighbouring countries such as Cameroon, Niger, and Chad, having fled insurgent violence in the Lake Chad Basin.

In 2025, UNHCR facilitated the return of 26,473 Nigerian refugees through voluntary repatriation programmes, including a landmark Tripartite Agreement signed in February with Chad and Nigeria.

Nigeria’s refugee response is coordinated through a Refugee Response Plan involving government agencies, UN bodies, international NGOs, and civil society organisations.

See also  Renowned Author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie loses one-year-old son after brief illness

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US says Nigerian students with valid F1, J1 visas safe from restrictions

Published

on

The United States Mission Nigeria says Nigerian students and exchange visitors holding valid visas will not be affected by the partial visa suspension under Presidential Proclamation 10998.

In a post on X on Monday, the mission disclosed this.

It stated, “Nigerian students and exchange participants with currently valid F1 and J1 visas are not affected by Presidential Proclamation 10998. Students and exchange participants with visas can continue to contribute to learning, research, and innovation at U.S. colleges and institutions.”

The clarification comes ahead of the January 1, 2026 implementation of Presidential Proclamation 10998, titled “Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States.”

What the proclamation does

Under the proclamation, the United States will partially suspend the issuance of certain visas to Nigerian nationals beginning at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on January 1, 2026.

The suspension covers:

  • Nonimmigrant B-1/B-2 visitor visas
  • F, M and J student and exchange visitor visas
  • Immigrant visas, with limited exceptions

However, U.S. authorities have stressed that the measure applies only to foreign nationals who are outside the United States on the effective date and who do not hold a valid U.S. visa as of January 1, 2026.

Officials have also stated: “Foreign nationals, even those outside the United States, who hold valid visas as of the effective date are not subject to Presidential Proclamation 10998. No visas issued before January 1, 2026, at 12:01 a.m. EST, have been or will be revoked pursuant to the Proclamation,”

In December 2025, Nigeria is among 19 countries affected by the partial suspension said to come into effect January 1, 2026.

See also  Kanu to defend self, lists Danjuma, Wike, Sanwo-Olu as witnesses

In recent months, the United States has introduced a series of immigration-related measures affecting Nigerians. Earlier this year, the validity of most non-immigrant visas issued to Nigerians was reduced to single-entry visas with a three-month duration.

In October, Washington also added Nigeria back to its list of countries accused of violating religious freedom. This was followed by Nigeria’s inclusion on a revised U.S. travel restriction list imposing partial entry restrictions.

PUNCH Online reports that this latest clarification from the U.S. Mission is expected to address concerns among Nigerian students and exchange participants about whether their existing F1 and J1 visas would remain valid after the proclamation takes effect.

For now, the mission has confirmed that holders of currently valid F1 and J1 visas can continue their studies and exchange programmes in the United States.

Earlier in February, the mission warned that visa overstays by Nigerian travellers could negatively affect opportunities for other citizens seeking to travel to the US.

F-1 visa: For international students enrolled full-time in academic programmes at U.S. schools or universities.

J-1 visa: For exchange visitors — including students, researchers, and interns — participating in approved educational or cultural exchange programmes in the U.S.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Wike cancels 485 Abuja land titles after failed verification

Published

on

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has approved the cancellation of 485 land documents in Abuja after they failed to meet verification standards set by the authorities.

The affected documents were nullified following an extensive review conducted by the Department of Land Administration in collaboration with the Abuja Geographic Information Systems.

Officials said that the documents did not pass authenticity checks, with many confirmed to be fake.

In a public notice issued by the Federal Capital Territory Administration on Monday and marked as Batch I, authorities confirmed that the invalid applications had been removed from the regularisation database. The notice specifically addressed applicants who had submitted Area Council land documents for validation.

“This is to inform the general public, particularly applicants who submitted Area Council land documents for regularisation, that the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory has approved the nullification or cancellation of applications that failed the necessary official checks for genuineness and have been confirmed to be fake,” the notice read.

The cancelled documents span several Area Councils and layouts. In the Bwari Area Council, the affected locations include Ushafa Village Expansion Scheme, Ushafa Extension and Dawaki Extension 1.

Within the Abuja Municipal Area Council, impacted districts include Kurudu-Jikwoyi Relocation, Kurudu Commercial, Karu Village Extension, Nyanya Phase IV Extension, Jikwoyi Residential, Sabon Lugbe and Lugbe I Extension.

Kuchiyako One layout in the Kuje Area Council was also listed among the affected areas.

Those affected include the Redeemed Christian Church of God, Ministry of Justice Staff Multi-purpose Cooperative Society among others.

See also  US Senate votes to block President Trump from further military action in Venezuela

Under Nigerian law, all land within the FCT is vested in the Federal Government. Certificates of Occupancy and other land titles must be processed through the office of the FCT Minister and formalised by AGIS.

The latest action comes amid ongoing land administration reforms initiated by the FCTA to address longstanding challenges, including forged documents, double allocations and irregular grants allegedly issued by some Area Councils.

The cancellations form part of a broader regularisation exercise that has been underway for months.

The background to the reforms dates back to last year, when the FCTA disclosed that only 8,287 out of 261,914 Area Council land documents submitted between 2006 and 2023 had been screened.

The 8,287 vetted land documents represented just 3.2 per cent of the total submissions, leaving 253,627 documents pending in the database.

FCDA officials acknowledged that progress had been slow over the years, noting that 96.8 per cent of submissions were still awaiting clearance.

Continue Reading

News

El-Rufai sues ICPC ₦1bn over unlawful Abuja home invasion

Published

on

A former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has filed a N1 billion fundamental rights enforcement suit against the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission over the alleged unlawful invasion and search of his Abuja residence.

In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/345/2026 and filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja on February 20 by his counsel, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), El-Rufai is challenging the validity of a search warrant issued on February 4 by a Chief Magistrate of the FCT Magistrates’ Court.

He is asking the court to declare the warrant authorising the search and seizure at his residence invalid, null and void.

According to the application, the former governor contended that the warrant was “null and void for lack of particularity, material drafting errors, ambiguity in execution parameters, overbreadth, and absence of probable cause, thereby constituting an unlawful and unreasonable search in violation of Section 37 of the Constitution.”

El-Rufai listed the ICPC as the first respondent, while the Chief Magistrate of the FCT Magistrates’ Court, Abuja Magisterial District, the Inspector-General of Police, and the Attorney-General of the Federation were named as second to fourth respondents, respectively.

He is seeking seven reliefs, including a declaration that the invasion and search of his residence at House 12, Mambilla Street, Aso Drive, Abuja, on February 19 at about 2 p.m., allegedly carried out by operatives of the ICPC and the Nigeria Police Force under the disputed warrant, violated his fundamental rights.

Specifically, he asked the court to declare that the search “amounts to a gross violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights to dignity of the human person, personal liberty, fair hearing, and privacy under Sections 34, 35, 36, and 37 of the Constitution.”

See also  Moves to demolish my house, hotel politically motivated – Gbenga Daniel insists

He further urged the court to declare that “any evidence obtained pursuant to the aforesaid invalid warrant and unlawful search is inadmissible in any proceedings against the applicant, as it was procured in breach of constitutional safeguards.”

Among other prayers, El-Rufai is seeking an order restraining the respondents from relying on or tendering any items seized during the search in any investigation or prosecution involving him.

He also asked for “an order directing the 1st and 3rd respondents (ICPC and I-G) to forthwith return all items seized from the applicant’s premises during the unlawful search, together with a detailed inventory thereof.”

In addition, he is demanding “the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira) as general, exemplary, and aggravated damages against the respondents jointly and severally for the violations of the applicant’s fundamental rights, including trespass, unlawful seizure, and the resultant psychological trauma, humiliation, distress, infringement of privacy, and reputational harm.”

The former governor broke down the N1 billion claim into N300 million as compensatory damages for psychological trauma and emotional distress; N400 million as exemplary damages to deter future misconduct by law enforcement agencies; and N300 million as aggravated damages for what he described as the malicious and oppressive nature of the respondents’ actions.

He also sought N100 million as the cost of filing the suit, covering legal fees and associated expenses.

In his grounds of argument, Iyamu maintained that the warrant was fundamentally defective, citing lack of specificity in the description of items to be seized, material typographical errors, ambiguous execution terms, overbroad directives and absence of verifiable probable cause.

See also  10,625 cubic metres of sand illegally dredged daily, Lagos laments

He argued that the alleged defects contravened Sections 143 to 148 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015; Section 36 of the ICPC Act, 2000; and constitutional protections against arbitrary intrusion.

According to him, “Section 143 of the ACJA requires that an application for a search warrant be supported by information in writing and on oath, setting forth reasonable grounds for suspicion,” which he said was absent in the present case.

He added that Section 144 mandates specific descriptions of the place to be searched and the items sought to prevent general warrants, but the warrant in question vaguely referred to “the thing aforesaid” without detail.

He further submitted that “Section 146 stipulates that the warrant must be in the prescribed form, free from defects that could mislead, but the document is riddled with errors in the address, date, and district designation.

“Section 147 allows direction to specified persons, but the warrant’s indiscriminate addressing to ‘all officers’ is overbroad and unaccountable.

“Section 148 permits execution at reasonable times, but the contradictory language creates ambiguity, undermining procedural clarity.”

Iyamu argued that the execution of the warrant on February 19 resulted in an unlawful invasion of his client’s premises and violated his constitutional rights.

He cited decided cases, including C.O.P. v. Omoh (1969) NCLR 137 and Fawehinmi v. IGP (2000) 7 NWLR (Pt. 665) 481, to support his position that evidence obtained through improper means is inadmissible.

In an affidavit supporting the application, Mohammed Shaba, a Principal Secretary to the former governor, deposed that officers of the ICPC and the Nigeria Police Force stormed the residence on February 19 under what he described as a defective warrant issued on or about February 4.

See also  PHOTOS: Sowore, others shun warnings, lead retired police officers in protest

He averred that the “search warrant did not specify the properties or items being searched for,” and alleged that the officers failed to comply with procedural requirements before conducting the search.

Shaba further stated that during the operation, officers allegedly seized personal documents and electronic devices, causing “undue humiliation, psychological trauma, and distress.”

He added that none of the seized items had been returned and that the application was filed in good faith to enforce the applicant’s constitutional rights.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending