Connect with us

Lifestyle

Lagos flyover where women, children risk lives for alms

Published

on

Daily, vulnerable citizens, children, the elderly, and people living with disabilities line the railway tracks across Lagos, defiantly confronting constant, life-threatening hazards, despite repeated efforts by authorities to keep them away from potential deadly harm. For them, every naira earned is a hard-fought lifeline, and the rail corridor is more than a mere path; it is a battleground where survival and resilience are tested with every step, writes IBRAHIM ADAM

As the day unfolds in Lagos State, bridges spanning rail tracks and adjoining roads transform into temporary shelters for beggars, who rely on the benevolence of sympathetic passers-by to quietly carry them through another day.

Even as the shrill blast of a train horn cuts through the air, reverberating along the steel veins that slice through the heart of the city, these vulnerable individuals remain undaunted.

One of the many bridges across Lagos, known as a hub for beggars, is the Agege Pen Cinema Flyover.

During multiple visits to the place, our correspondent observed that women, both young and old, far outnumbered men among those seeking alms beneath the structure.

While many clutched worn bags with their calloused hands roughened by years of hardship, some cradled small children, rocking them gently as they waited for whatever the day might bring.

Tension is never far away. As a train thundered past one afternoon, some fled for safety without hesitation, while a daring handful merely took a few steps back, their faces inches from the fast-moving steel, silently calculating danger with chilling precision.

Among them was an amputee, balanced on a single crutch, who stood perilously close to the speeding train, leaning forward as it roared past, his fragile stance underscoring the thin line between survival and death.

The moment the train thundered through the tracks, he quickly hopped away, avoiding the angry stares of concerned passers-by.

Access to this perilous corridor is through two staircases. One, wooden and splintered, sways uncertainly beneath the weight of those who climb it; the other, built of concrete blocks, appears sturdier, yet offers little protection from the dangers that define daily movement in the area.

At the far end, stones have been heaped into a makeshift pathway, enabling passage over the busy lanes where traders go about their daily commerce.

Whenever donations, whether money or gifts, are offered, a group of miscreants takes charge of the distribution, making sure others receive their share.

Our correspondent also visited some of their homes, located a short distance from the railway tracks. The makeshift shanties, which are cramped and closely packed along a narrow gutter, are constructed from discarded corrugated iron sheets and scraps of wood.

Some have no doors, while others are shielded with torn pieces of fabric. Men could be seen taking turns relieving themselves at the edge of the gutter, as others lie asleep inside the dark, stifling interiors.

Portrait of hardship

At 65, Nafiu Magaji’s weathered face tells a silent story of hardship and a life spent navigating society’s neglect.

A native of Ngwa Zango Community in Bichi Local Government Area of Kano State, Nafiu Magaji is married with five children, all of whom depend entirely on the paltry sum he makes daily for survival.

“The reason I started begging is due to prolonged neglect and abandonment,” he said. “For many years, people in my condition have been forgotten by those responsible for our welfare. When a person is left helpless and without hope, they are often forced to do whatever they can simply to survive.”

See also  General Sani Abacha (1943–1998): Nigeria’s Most Controversial Military Ruler

Magaji identified the lack of access to education, food and clothing as the primary factors that pushed him into begging.

Harassment, he added, has further compounded their hardship as they are routinely chased from one location to another by government officials and security agencies.

“Instead of assistance, we are constantly displaced. This has been our reality for as long as I can remember,” he lamented.

Pursuit of safer ground

In search of relative safety, Magaji said he joined his colleagues along the railway corridor. Begging on major roads, he explained, exposed them to the constant threat of traffic accidents, but the rail tracks, which appeared calmer and more accessible, embody greater risk.

“The reality is that the railway environment is extremely dangerous. We remain there not by choice, but because we have no alternative,” he said.

Magaji recalled witnessing several fatal accidents involving fast-moving trains, particularly among beggars who were blind or deaf and unable to react in time.

“Trains move at great speed. Even when someone tries to respond, it is often too late. Some survive by chance; others die instantly. I have seen lives lost before my eyes,” he said.

Mogaji said that due to the risks, railway officials regularly chase them away, only for them to return later in desperation.

“I make about N3,000 daily from begging. I return to the railway every day because I must pay rent and feed my family. There is no other option,” he said.

The ban on street begging

In August 2021, the Lagos State Government imposed a ban on street begging, launching a statewide operation to clear beggars and street urchins from public spaces.

At a joint press conference in Alausa, the then Commissioner for Youth and Social Development, Olusegun Dawodu, alongside officials from the Information Ministry and the Police, vowed to eradicate street begging.

He described the practice as a social vice that constituted a nuisance to law-abiding citizens.

“As a responsible government, we will not allow Lagos to become a haven for beggars. Street begging, if unchecked, will undermine all our development plans,” Dawodu said.

Investigations, he added, revealed that organised syndicates transport children and adults from other parts of the country to Lagos to engage in alms begging and hawking, turning it into a lucrative enterprise.

In July 2024, the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, said lawmakers were considering legislation to regulate alms solicitation across the state. The proposed law would empower the government and registered foundations to oversee aid distribution and sanction those found begging or exploiting children.

In December 2025, the Lagos State Government announced the arrest of 95 individuals for street begging across different parts of the state.

The Commissioner for Environment and Water Resources, Tokunbo Wahab, said the arrests were part of sustained efforts to eliminate what he described as “environmental nuisance.”

A mother’s fight for survival

At 57, Balikis Adamu bears the weight of a life shaped by loss and hardship. A native of Gujungu Community in Taura Local Government Area of Jigawa State, she is a mother of six, five girls and one boy.

See also  Lady sues Peller, demands N395m for filming her without consent

Her life took a devastating turn more than 14 years ago when her husband died, leaving her to raise the children alone. With no means of sustenance, Balikis said she was forced into begging—not by choice, but out of desperation to provide for her children’s basic needs.

She moved to Lagos with her children, earning about N2,000 daily to cater for them. Over time, the struggle became unbearable, and Balikis said she eventually sent her children back to Jigawa so she could continue alone.

“At night, I sleep by the roadside. I wait for nearby shops to close before finding a place to lie down. This has become my daily routine. Over time, I grew used to it and accepted it as my destiny,” she said quietly.

That fragile existence suffered another blow when she was involved in an accident that left her permanently injured.

“I was trying to cross the road when a tricycle hit me,” she recalled. “I received treatment in Lagos and later returned to Jigawa for further care, but it did not work. My hand became permanently deformed. I have accepted it as my fate, which is why I returned to Lagos to continue begging.”

Despite the daily hardships, Balikis still holds on to hope that support could help her rebuild her life. She said she would willingly abandon begging if given assistance.

Hausa council calls for decisive action

The Chieftaincy Council of the Hausa Community in Agege, Lagos, has called on the government to take decisive steps to permanently remove beggars from public spaces, particularly railway corridors.

Speaking to Saturday PUNCH, the council said repeated sensitisation and orientation programmes had failed to yield lasting results, as many beggars continued to return to the streets despite sustained engagement.

“It saddens us deeply that these people are still on the streets and along the rail tracks begging,” the council said, noting that previous bans and arrests had not addressed the problem.

The council disclosed that it had engaged Northern governors in efforts to find a permanent solution. While many beggars were returned to their home states and supported, the initiative proved short-lived, as several later returned to Lagos.

“At this point, only firm and coordinated government action can offer a lasting solution,” the council stated, attributing the return of many beggars to the relatively high income generated from begging in Lagos.

The council revealed that earnings from begging often surpass the income of many salaried workers, which makes it difficult for most of them to quit.

While acknowledging the generosity of Lagos residents, the council warned that continued almsgiving sustains the practice and draws beggars to hazardous locations such as railway corridors.

“These beggars are organised. They have leaders and even tax one another because of the large sums involved. For many, begging has become a business,” the council added.

‘Train accidents have claimed many lives’

A chieftain of the Hausa community, Khalid Ahmed, warned beggars against occupying railway tracks, citing frequent train accidents that have claimed numerous lives.

He highlighted the danger faced by vulnerable individuals, including amputees and those with hearing or speech impairments, who may be unable to respond swiftly to oncoming trains.

“Accidents happen there all the time,” Ahmed said. “Some people are crushed before they can move. Others, sometimes drunk, fall asleep on the tracks. When the train comes at full speed, it kills instantly. We have lost count of how many lives have been lost.”

See also  I want to wait until marriage; Favour Agbro, deceased rape victim’s old video resurfaces

He noted that leaders within the begging community often issue safety warnings, but these are frequently ignored.

Ahmed called for government intervention, stressing that most beggars are driven by desperation rather than choice.

‘I tasted death three times’

A reformed beggar, Sani Bashir, recounted surviving three train accidents within nine months. His body still bears the scars of multiple fractures, a grim reminder that compelled him to abandon begging.

“It was horrible. I tasted death three times, not once, but three times,” he told Saturday PUNCH. “Each incident happened about three months apart. I never imagined it would happen, but Alhamdulillah, I am alive.”

NRC to remove unauthorised occupants

To safeguard lives and protect the rail tracks, the Nigerian Railway Corporation said it came up with plans to remove unauthorised occupants from the Lagos rail corridor.

An NRC official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the exercise would be carried out in collaboration with the Lagos State Government and security agencies.

“During previous operations, the state government supported us with the Police and Civil Defence Corps. Illegal structures and encroachments were removed,” the official said.

He added that the NRC was fully aware of the presence of beggars along the tracks.

“We are doing everything possible to ensure they leave. Their safety also matters, we do not want them to become victims of train accidents,” he said.

‘Government should provide safe locations for us’

The chairman of beggars in Agege, Kabir Usman, and his deputy, Mohammed Nasir, appealed to the government to provide safe, designated locations where vulnerable people could live and sustain themselves.

He said such an arrangement would improve safety, guarantee access to basic needs, and promote more orderly livelihoods. “Agege has a higher concentration of beggars than many other parts of Lagos. If dedicated areas are provided, people can survive without constant harassment, displacement, or discrimination, while contributing to a more organised and peaceful environment,” he said.

They alleged being exploited by the state government during elections, only to be later neglected.

Psychological toll of repeated trauma

A psychotherapist and emotional intelligence expert, Jacob Micheal, said repeated exposure to life-threatening situations can leave vulnerable people emotionally numb, which is known as desensitisation or traumatic adaptation.

According to Michael, many affected individuals develop a fatalistic mindset, adding,  “When a person no longer places value on their own life, it becomes extremely difficult for them to make choices that protect their well-being,” he said.

The psychotherapist noted that many beggars are disconnected from family and society.

“Structured support helps reconnect them to skills, purpose, and community. Guided storytelling sessions, where individuals narrate their experiences, give meaning to trauma. Once trauma is given meaning, the brain no longer holds it emotionally.

“When someone begins to see themselves as useful, even in a small way, their outlook on life changes. With structured psychotherapy and social support, even severely traumatised individuals can recover,” he said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

Catholic bishops’ inconvenient truth

Published

on

Politics and religion often conflate into a toxic brew. So, it is with the storm over John Onaiyekan’s comments after the recent meeting between President Bola Tinubu and the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria. As the waves billow and swell, the encounter opens a window into the tremors in government rather than the cardinal’s intentions.

Instead of treating the bishops’ observations as sincere moral feedback from a respected institution, some of the administration’s vocal defenders responded with personal attacks, accusing the cardinal of partisanship and abuse of clerical privilege.

That reaction was unfortunate and avoidable.

No elected government claiming democratic credentials should treat independent criticism as hostility.

Yet the ferocious responses from the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike; the President’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala; and the SSA on Media, Temitope Ajayi, suggested Onaiyekan had committed a grave offence by saying the bishops told the President Nigeria was “bleeding,” that poverty was worsening, and many were struggling under economic reforms.

The cardinal’s fault was not fabricating facts but speaking publicly about an uncomfortable conversation.

He said the President disagreed, insisting the economy was improving and reforms were laying the foundation for recovery.

The bishops, he said, neither expected agreement nor sought to embarrass the President; they were discharging a moral duty to tell him what many Nigerians could not.

That should have ended the matter. Instead, critics turned a healthy exchange into a public quarrel. Bwala questioned the cardinal’s neutrality, alleging the church supported Peter Obi in 2023.

Ajayi dismissed the bishops as offering only one perspective. Wike argued that having taken sides in a past election disqualified the cardinal from impartiality and faulted the bishops for questioning INEC’s neutrality ahead of 2027 without stronger proof.

These points merit consideration. Religious leaders, like journalists and civil society actors, should aim for fairness as credibility rests on intellectual honesty. Achievements by government should be acknowledged. But fairness works both ways.

The administration’s defenders owe Nigerians an honest engagement with the bishops’ substance rather than attempts to discredit the messengers.

Who the cardinal voted for is irrelevant to whether millions of Nigerians are suffering. Hunger and inflation do not check party membership before striking families.

See also  Ajibike Ogunyemi: The Osogbo Sculptor Bridging Tradition and Modernity

One of the weakest responses to public criticism is to attack motives while avoiding the issues raised. That strategy failed to convince many Nigerians. Therefore, it is no surprise that support for Onaiyekan flowed from across civic space.

The Northern Youth Council said he reflected lived realities; the Middle Belt Forum called the attacks unfair; the Catholic Laity Council defended the church’s pastoral duty to speak for the vulnerable.

Former governor and minister Rotimi Amaechi, himself a Catholic, reminded the Presidency that bishops have every right to criticise governments and urged responses based on evidence, not indignation.

Even Orji Kalu, APC senator and former Abia State governor, threatened to resign from the party if the bishops were insulted, noting their similar interventions across Africa.

The public backlash appears to have prompted moderation. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, reaffirmed the administration’s respect for the Catholic Church and promised deeper consultations.

That is the mature response expected of a confident government, and it should have been the first instinct.

The episode exposes a deeper problem.

With the 2027 elections on the horizon, there is a growing tendency in official circles to interpret every criticism through a partisan lens.

Independent institutions that refuse to sing from the government’s hymn book risk being branded hostile. Such defensiveness serves neither democracy nor good governance.

Onaiyekan’s sharper point was that too many people around the President paint an overly rosy picture of the country. Whether entirely fair, the observation highlights a real danger that administrations insulated by courtiers and loyalists risk mistaking praise for patriotism.

Presidents need more than briefings, official statistics and flattering presentations. They need uncomfortable truths from independent voices including economists, labour unions, journalists, business leaders, traditional rulers and religious organisations.

Governments that refuse to listen lose touch with the people they govern. That is why criticism is not the enemy of reform; silence is.

The Tinubu administration can rightly argue it inherited an economy in deep distress and that difficult choices were necessary. Removing the petrol subsidy and liberalising the foreign exchange market were politically costly but, many economists agree, economically inevitable.

See also  General Sani Abacha (1943–1998): Nigeria’s Most Controversial Military Ruler

The government has expanded fiscal space for states, created NELFUND, launched youth initiatives, and helped end the destructive cycle of prolonged ASUU strikes. These are notable achievements and deserve acknowledgement.

But governments are judged by citizens’ lived realities, not only by economic theory or improving macro indicators.

Foreign reserves have strengthened to $52 billion from about $3 billion, fiscal revenues rose to all-time highs, and the naira exchange rate has stabilised compared with the immediate post-reform shock.

Yet these gains have not delivered meaningful relief for the average Nigerian. Inflation remains punishing at over 15 per cent and above 37 per cent in at least 10 states; food and transport costs are soaring; healthcare and medication are costly; electricity tariffs and rent have escalated; small businesses struggle with high energy costs and expensive credit.

For too many families, over 70 per cent of income is spent on feeding alone. Multidimensional poverty affects 63 per cent of Nigerians, per the World Bank.

The bishops sought to communicate that reality. It cannot be dismissed by citing encouraging macro trends.

The reforms are also incomplete. A parallel foreign-exchange market persists, reflecting distortions and weak confidence.

Oil production remains below projections. Domestic refiners complain of inadequate crude supply even as the government extends Project Gazelle with a new $4.5 billion refinancing, raising concerns about future crude commitments while local refining capacity is planned to double.

External debt keeps rising, increasing exchange-rate exposure and debt-service obligations, which already consume half of revenues.

Terrorism, banditry and kidnapping continue to terrorise large swathes of the country, driving farmers from fertile lands and worsening food inflation.

Official and independent reports indicate that more than 628,000 people have been killed and over 2.2 million abducted since 2023, according to a BusinessDay report in June.

These are measurable national realities, not opposition talking points. Governments need independent voices to speak honestly about them.  No pushback can erase the fact that Nigeria is bleeding.

The Catholic Church has a long history of such moral witness. During military rule, bishops such as Olubunmi Okogie, an Emeritus Cardinal, condemned authoritarianism, corruption and human-rights abuses.

See also  I want to wait until marriage; Favour Agbro, deceased rape victim’s old video resurfaces

Under democratic governments, the church continued to criticise administrations across the political spectrum over insecurity, governance failures and human suffering. Its loyalty has been to moral principles, not to any party.

Tinubu should not regard himself as uniquely persecuted, nor should his supporters mistake clerical witness for partisan politics.

Religious leaders are, firstly, citizens. They bury terrorism victims, counsel unemployed graduates, comfort widows and feed hungry families. If such leaders cannot speak about poverty, insecurity and governance, democracy becomes a farce.

Political parties are also inconsistent. Many who now defend petrol subsidy removal opposed it when it was proposed under President Goodluck Jonathan. Those who benefited from the freedom to criticise must not deny others the same liberty when roles reverse.

One of the most perilous governance tendencies is believing that criticism weakens government. On the contrary, governments make worse mistakes when they become prisoners of official optimism.

They need independent feedback to test whether policies yield intended outcomes. Economic models and official reports are necessary but insufficient; they must be complemented by honest input from labour, business, academia, the media, civil society and faith leaders. Without it, governments risk governing statistical abstractions rather than human realities.

It is encouraging that the administration now appears to be recalibrating. Akume’s pledge of deeper engagement deserves commendation.

Consultation, not confrontation, marks mature democratic leadership. The Presidency gains nothing by quarrelling with institutions focused on the country’s welfare.

Tinubu has often said he welcomes constructive criticism. He insisted that he sought the job and should not be pitied. This episode is a chance to prove it.

Labelling respected clerics as partisan for voicing uncomfortable truths suggests the administration may lack confidence in the transformative power of its own reforms. That is diminishing.

Nigeria’s problems are too serious for official defensiveness. Reform is a journey requiring constant feedback. The bishops fulfilled their civic and moral duty. The Presidency must perform its constitutional role by listening, not by silencing dissent.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF TRUST IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can survive difficult times, financial struggles, and disagreements—but when trust disappears, the relationship begins to lose its foundation.

When a husband no longer trusts his wife, or a wife no longer trusts her husband, even innocent actions can become suspicious. A simple phone call becomes a question. Coming home late becomes an accusation. A private conversation becomes a source of fear and jealousy.

Lack of trust creates emotional distance.

It produces constant suspicion, arguments, insecurity, resentment, and sometimes secretive behaviour. Instead of feeling safe with each other, couples begin to feel like enemies living under the same roof.

Trust is not built by controlling your spouse, checking their phone every minute, or constantly demanding explanations. Trust is built through honesty, faithfulness, transparency, consistency, and keeping your word.

If trust has been broken, don’t pretend everything is fine. Talk about it. Admit mistakes. Forgive where possible. Set healthy boundaries. And be willing to rebuild what has been damaged.

Remember: love may bring two people together, but trust helps keep them together.

💔 Don’t allow suspicion to destroy what communication and honesty can repair.

BUILD TRUST. BE FAITHFUL. BE HONEST. PROTECT YOUR MARRIAGE.

“Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour.”
— Ephesians 4:25 (KJV)

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Ajibike Ogunyemi: The Osogbo Sculptor Bridging Tradition and Modernity
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF OPENNESS IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can look beautiful on the outside and still be struggling on the inside when there is no openness between husband and wife.

When couples stop communicating honestly, keep secrets, hide their feelings, or are afraid to discuss important issues, emotional distance begins to grow. What starts as “I don’t want to cause a problem” can eventually become mistrust, resentment, loneliness, and constant misunderstanding.

Openness does not mean telling your spouse everything in a hurtful or careless way. It means creating a safe relationship where both partners can honestly talk about their feelings, concerns, mistakes, finances, expectations, struggles, and dreams without fear of unnecessary humiliation or condemnation.

A strong marriage requires:

• Honest communication — Talk about problems instead of allowing them to grow in silence.
• Trust and transparency — Avoid unnecessary secrecy that can damage confidence in the relationship.
• Active listening — Listen to understand, not simply to respond or attack.
• Emotional vulnerability — Let your spouse know when you are hurting, worried, disappointed, or afraid.
• Respect — Honesty should never become an excuse for insults, threats, or emotional abuse.
• Forgiveness — When mistakes are acknowledged, work together toward healing and restoration.

The Bible says:

“Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” — Proverbs 11:14 (KJV)

And:

“Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.” — James 1:19 (KJV)

Marriage should be a place where two people can feel safe enough to communicate, honest enough to admit their weaknesses, and humble enough to work through their differences.

See also  The image celebrates Captain Chinyere Kalu, Nigeria’s first female commercial pilot.

Don’t allow silence, secrets, and suspicion to build walls between you and your spouse. Talk. Listen. Understand. Forgive. Grow together.

❤️ Openness builds trust. Trust strengthens intimacy. And healthy communication helps build a stronger marriage.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending