Connect with us

News

US alerts citizens in Nigeria as Shi’ite protest rocks Lagos over Israel-Iran tensions

Published

on

Members of the South-West leadership of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria staged a peaceful protest in Lagos State, denouncing the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in strikes by the United States and Israel.

The development comes as Mansoureh Khojasteh Bagherzadeh, wife of Iran’s Supreme Leader, reportedly died from injuries sustained during recent United States and Israeli strikes at her residence in Tehran.

According to the Jamaran News Agency on Monday, Bagherzadeh had slipped into a coma after being injured in the attacks but succumbed to her wounds on March 2.

Her death comes amid reports that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in the early hours of Saturday, February 28, during coordinated US and Israeli strikes.

Several other senior figures of the Iranian regime were also said to have been killed in the attack.

The protest in Lagos on Monday follows similar demonstrations by the Shi’ites in Kano, Yobe, Gombe, and Bauchi states on Sunday.

In Lagos, the demonstrators marched through parts of the Maryland axis, carrying placards and banners denouncing what they described as an “invasion” of Iran and the targeted assassination of the long-serving Iranian leader.

South-West coordinator of IMN, Muftau Zakariya, said the protest would remain peaceful and continue across the South-West geopolitical zone.

The protesters marched, chanting solidarity with Iran and strong opposition to the actions of the United States and Israel.

He said that the protest was organised to express their concerns about what he called sustained invasions of sovereign nations by the United States administration, citing Venezuela as a recent example of foreign interference.

He also urged the Federal Government to reject the presence of US troops in the country.

Zakariya claimed that terrorism in Nigeria has increased since the involvement of the US government. He said heightened and sustained attacks in Kwara State followed what he described as US involvement in the country’s affairs.

Another leader of the movement, Muhammadu Bashir, said the protest was to register their concerns over the killing of Iranian leaders.

Recall that in the protest in Gombe, an IMN leader, Muhammad Abbari, described the attack on Khamenei as “unfortunate and unacceptable.”

See also  El-Rufai anticipates arrest as police detain allies

Abbari said, “We strongly condemn any attack on a religious and political leader of such standing.

“However, we urge our followers to remain calm, peaceful and law-abiding in the expression of their concerns.”

He emphasised that the protest was organised to demonstrate solidarity and not to incite violence.

“Our action today is purely peaceful. We are here to register our grievances and show solidarity, nothing more,” Abbari added.

Security personnel were observed monitoring parts of the metropolis during the procession.

However, no breach of peace was recorded as the protest ended without incident.

Meanwhile, the Kano State Commissioner of Police, Ibrahim Bakori, has heightened security measures across the state following protests by members of the IMN.

The CP told The PUNCH that the Shi’ite group did not notify the police of their planned demonstration, but that the command got intelligence of the protests and quickly deployed their personnel to the scenes.

He added, “Our men escorted them to ensure the peaceful take-off of the protests and to avoid any unrest. You know it was evening, people are fasting.”

He further disclosed that the police command had deployed officers across the state and continued to monitor their movements.

Members of the IMN staged a procession on Sunday at the Fegge Central Mosque in Kofar Waika around 2.30 pm to mourn the reported killing of Khamenei.

The demonstration, initially peaceful, saw participants kneeling on roads, halting traffic, carrying white shrouds, lighting candles, and distributing water and dates to bystanders.

Although the protest ended peacefully around 4.00 pm, security agencies remained on standby for potential follow-up demonstrations.

The Kano State Police Public Relations Officer, Abdullahi Kiyawa, added that the command was monitoring developments and liaising with community leaders to prevent escalation.

In Bauchi, the PPRO, Nafiu Habib, in an interview with The PUNCH, affirmed the demonstration on Sunday in the state was conducted without any reported incident.

“Like every Nigerian individual or group, the Shi’ites have the right to peaceful demonstration. We are aware that yesterday they conducted the same in Bauchi,” Habib said.

See also  Nigeria’s Inflation rate falls to 21.8% — NBS

“What we witnessed was peaceful, and up till now, we have not recorded any breakdown of law and order,” he added.

Speaking on IMN in Bauchi, Ahmad Yashi said the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader would not bring peace but would rather aggravate the situation.

“We are with Iran in heart and soul. They are targeting the Iranian Supreme Leader to make the country surrender, but they are mistaken. The Supreme Leader, as a religious authority, is among those dousing tensions,” he said.

Yashi described Islam as a religion of peace but blamed Western powers for what he termed persistent global unrest.

“Islam is a peaceful religion, but the West is the problem. They are selfish and want everyone to bow to them. This will not happen; those days are gone,” he added.

He further disclosed that members of the movement in Bauchi staged the peaceful demonstration in solidarity with Iran.

“Yesterday, we conducted a peaceful demonstration in support of Iran, and every Muslim must take a side in this war. You are either with the righteous or with the oppressors,” Yashi stated.

Also in Yobe, hundreds of Shi’ite Muslims marched through the streets of the local government areas of Potiskum, Bade, and Nguru on Sunday to mourn the death of their spiritual leader in Iran.

Demonstrators carried portraits of Khamenei, waved Iranian flags, and burnt the flags of the United States and Israel in a dramatic display of grief and defiance.

Abdullahi Hassan, one of the protest leaders, told the crowd, “We are shocked and devastated over the killing of our leader. This is a painful moment not only for us in Yobe but for Shiites across the world. Yet we will not be broken. We will continue to stand firm, and our voices will not be silenced. This is the beginning of our victory, and we will honour the legacy of our leader in every action we take.”

He added, “We burn the flags of the United States and Israel not out of hatred but to show that we will never bow to oppression. The sons and daughters of Khamenei remain strong, committed, and united. Our faith is our strength, and our resolve is unshakable.”

See also  Big diplomatic overhaul: Tinubu’s 65 envoy picks brace for Senate storm

The protests lasted for several hours across the three local government areas as demonstrators marched through the streets, chanting slogans, holding placards, and waving pictures of Khamenei.

US issues alert

Meanwhile, the United States Government has issued a security alert to its citizens in Nigeria following escalating hostilities between the US and Iran.

In a statement on Monday, the US authorities warned Americans abroad to remain vigilant in the wake of ongoing military operations involving Iran.

“Following the launch of U.S. combat operations in Iran, Americans worldwide and especially in the Middle East should follow the guidance in the latest security alerts issued by the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate,” the advisory stated.

The alert noted that Americans could experience travel disruptions due to periodic airspace closures linked to the unfolding crisis.

The US Department of State advised citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution.

It also urged them to enrol in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program to receive timely security updates and to follow the ‘US Department of State Security Updates for U.S. Citizens’ WhatsApp channel for further information.

The advisory follows reports by Iranian state and local media confirming the death of Ali Khamenei, after airstrikes reportedly carried out by the United States and Israel.

Several other high-ranking Iranian officials were also said to have been killed in the strikes.

In retaliation, Iran has reportedly launched multiple missiles targeting U.S. bases in Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, vowing to avenge the death of its Supreme Leader and other regime officials.

US President Donald Trump, speaking in a live broadcast while the attacks were ongoing on Saturday, said he was determined to eliminate members of the Iranian regime.

He also called on Iranian citizens to take control of their government once military operations were concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Wike to PDP govs: Your actions will bury party

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  FG defers 70% of 2025 capital projects to 2026

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  FG defends Tinubu’s UK visit, highlights strategic Nigeria‑UK ties

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Kano gov sacks investment commissioner

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  FG defends Tinubu’s UK visit, highlights strategic Nigeria‑UK ties

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  FG defers 70% of 2025 capital projects to 2026

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending