Connect with us

News

Real reasons Tinubu sacked ex-IG Egbetokun revealed

Published

on

Former Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, was removed from office by President Bola Tinubu over his reported resistance to the President’s directive to withdraw police officers from Very Important Personalities protection duties, PUNCH has learnt.

According to multiple highly placed officials in the Presidency and the police establishment with first-hand knowledge of events that unfolded between Monday evening and Tuesday, the former IG was also compelled to resign over his alleged opposition to state policing and vindictive conducts towards colleagues.

Although Egbetokun officially cited “family issues” in his resignation letter submitted on Tuesday, insiders told our correspondent that the former police chief was summoned to the Presidential Villa and informed that he had to step down.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to comment on the matter.

“That Monday evening, he (the President) called him to tell him that he has to go,” one of the sources said.

Another insider explained that the former IG pleaded for more time, asking to be allowed to complete his four-year tenure, which was expected to run until October 2027 under a 2024 amendment to the Police Act granting IGs a fixed term regardless of age or years of service.

“The former IG was supposed to go in 2027. He begged that he be allowed to complete his term. The President said no, he had to go,” the source said.

PUNCH gathered that the President’s decision was driven by three grievances that had accumulated over several months.

The most immediate trigger, Presidency sources said, was Egbetokun’s handling of the November 23, 2025 presidential directive ordering the withdrawal of over 11,000 police officers from VIP protection duties for them to be redeployed to communities plagued by kidnapping, banditry and terrorism.

An official in the Presidency told our correspondent that Egbetokun did not merely drag his feet but pushed back directly against the President during a meeting with security chiefs, arguing that business leaders and senior corporate executives needed police protection.

“One of the issues is the withdrawal of police from VIPs. He didn’t execute it as quickly as the President wanted. He did it halfheartedly. He actually argued against it with the President during the security meeting, saying that the economic actors, the business people need to be protected,” he said.

The source added that the President rejected the argument, pointing to the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps as an adequate replacement.

“The President said yes, they need to be protected. But the police don’t have to protect them. Civil Defence can protect them. In fact, he said, ‘the Civil Defence is even more lethal in handling of arms. So, what are you talking about? What is the difference between Civil Defence and the police? They are both carrying arms. So why are you fixated on having police to do that?’

See also  2027 polls behind surge in killings - CDS

“We are not saying they won’t be protected because they are the bloodstream of the economy. We don’t want our business people to die the kind of death they shouldn’t die. But Civil Defence are trained. They’re even more lethal than police. In any case, the business people also have the resources to hire their own security,” the source added.

On December 10, 2025, weeks after issuing the initial order, President Tinubu reiterated the order at a Federal Executive Council meeting, declaring it “non-negotiable” and directing the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, to work with the IGP and NSCDC to replace the withdrawn officers.

He also asked the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, and the Department of State Services to issue further guidance and ensure the directive is effected.

Another insider knowledgeable about the incident revealed that the initial resistance had a financial dimension.

According to the source, the VIP deployment scheme generated over N300bn annually for the police through a system in which businesses and individuals pay a fee for each officer deployed to them.

“The truth of the matter is, from what we know, what goes into police from money that these people pay for protection is over N300bn annually.

“They collect N100,000 per month from one officer. So, they will give the officer maybe N50,000. So, the rest goes through the chain. It trickles down.

“The President’s order was very disruptive. So, the police establishment was not happy because he removed a big income source from them. They resisted it. Some of them started wearing mufti. So, it means that they found a way to compromise it and the President got to learn about it,” the source said.

Reports had earlier indicated that some officers, rather than comply with the withdrawal order, disguised themselves in NSCDC and vigilante uniforms to continue protecting VIPs, while others paid as much as N500,000 to have their service rifles reissued after returning them.

State police opposition

The second grievance, according to multiple sources who spoke with Saturday PUNCH, is Egbetokun’s alleged opposition to the creation of state police.

State police creation is a flagship security reform that President Tinubu has championed and it is currently the subject of a constitutional amendment process in the National Assembly.

See also  MDAs under fire as FG probes TSA violations

A source familiar with the President’s thinking said the former IGP went as far as presenting a memorandum against state policing at a National Assembly public hearing, a move seen as a direct challenge to the administration’s policy direction.

“He is publicly against state police. Even at the National Assembly, the police memorandum that he read when they did public hearing, he was against it.

“How can you be against something that your Commander-In-Chief wants? He attended a public event where you are arguing against state police. It wasn’t a prudent thing to be openly against what your principal is pushing,” the source said.

He cited the timing of Egbetokun’s exit, saying, “Just hours after the former IGP was summoned to the Villa on Monday evening, President Tinubu had told state governors at an interfaith breaking of fast that the establishment of state police would not be postponed.

“Without it, farms cannot flourish, businesses cannot grow, and families cannot sleep in peace. We will establish state police to curb insecurity,” the President declared at the dinner.

During another Iftar dinner on Wednesday, Tinubu requested the National Assembly to begin the process of amending the constitution to incorporate state police as part of efforts to tackle the nation’s security challenges.

Vindictive conduct

The third reason, sources said, related to Egbetokun’s conduct toward colleagues, particularly his treatment of Olatunji Disu, the man who ultimately replaced him as the Acting Inspector General of Police.

Both men served under Tinubu when he was governor of Lagos State between 1999 and 2007.

Egbetokun was the Chief Security Officer while Disu as Aide-De-Camp, and both owed their career advancement to the President’s political support.

A Presidency source who spoke on condition of anonymity said the President found Egbetokun’s behaviour toward those who had shared the same journey troubling.

“The President doesn’t like people using power against their peers, your friends, people that you grew up with, people that were with you, your colleagues, those who were part of your career growth.

“He (Egbetokun) used his position against Disu. They both served Tinubu when he was governor. Disu was ADC, he was CSO.

“How can somebody that two of you were mentored by the same person and has been instrumental to lifting all of you…So, if Tinubu acted like him, would he have gotten here?” the source said.

He added that the President had been instrumental to every major promotion Egbetokun received throughout his police career, including during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari.

See also  FG enforces no-work-no-pay on striking ASUU members

The insider said, “Tinubu helped him to attain all the positions he got to. It was Tinubu that was pushing him, using political leverage. Tinubu was the one that pushed him to commissioner of police, to be DIG and he eventually became the IG.

“He got Buhari to promote him four times. I mean, he wrote formal letters to Buhari for all his promotions. So, if you have enjoyed someone’s favour, why do you use your position against other people?”

He added that Egbetokun had been hoping Disu would quietly retire from service upon turning 60 in April 2026, removing him as a rival without any overt action.

“He also wanted him to retire out of service in April. He was hoping that this guy is going to retire. So, he just wanted him to ease out by age. But you know the good thing is, the President signed that act that once you become IG, that four-year kicks in,” the source said.

Police Council to meet next week

However, a source familiar with the transition process told our correspondent that the Nigeria Police Council is expected to meet next week to formally consider Disu’s confirmation.

“The Police Council meeting is going to be next week. I’m hearing Monday. But until the schedule is set and invitations have been sent out, it can change,” he said.

Disu currently serves in an acting capacity. The Police Council is expected to consider his appointment after which President Tinubu will transmit his name to the Senate for confirmation as substantive IGP, in line with the Police Act 2020.

Tinubu appointed Egbetokun as the 22nd IGP on June 19, 2023, shortly after his inauguration.

Egbetokun succeeded Alkali Baba, whose tenure had expired in September 2023 following an extension granted by former President Buhari.

The appointment drew early criticism because Egbetokun, born on September 4, 1964, was approaching the mandatory retirement age of 60.

When he turned 60 in September 2024, civil society groups called for his retirement, but the National Assembly passed the Police Act (Amendment) Bill in July 2024, granting IGPs a fixed four-year tenure regardless of age, effectively extending his stay until October 2027.

His replacement, Disu, 59, a Lagos Island native, joined the police on May 18, 1992. He holds a bachelor’s degree in English Education from Lagos State University and master’s degrees in Public Administration and in Criminology, Security and Legal Psychology.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

South Korean judge who hiked ex-first lady’s jail sentence found dead

Published

on

A South Korean judge who more than doubled the former first lady’s prison sentence last month was found dead on Wednesday, police said.

Shin Jong-o was “found unconscious around 1:00 am (1600 GMT on Tuesday)… at the Seoul High Court building”, an investigator at Seocho district police station told AFP.

Shin was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead, he said, adding: “There is no sign of foul play in the death.”

Local media reported that Shin had left a suicide note, but the investigator said there was none.

Last month, Shin presided over 53-year-old Kim Keon Hee’s appeal trial, finding her guilty of stock manipulation and bribery, and increasing her sentence to four years from 20 months.

The heavier sentence came after her acquittal by a lower court on the stock manipulation charge was overturned.

Shin said at the time that Kim had “failed to acknowledge her culpability and has instead consistently resorted to excuses”.

The police investigator said on Wednesday that the judge’s “bereaved family is stricken by the incident” and requests privacy.

AFP

See also  FG seeks young Nigerians to boost primary healthcare
Continue Reading

News

Court frees ex-HOS Oyo-Ita in N570m money laundering case

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday discharged and acquitted former Head of Service of the Federation, Winifred Oyo-Ita, of alleged N570m money laundering charges filed against her by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

The trial judge, Justice James Omotosho, upheld the no-case submissions filed by Oyo-Ita and eight co-defendants, holding that the EFCC failed to establish a prima facie case against them after about six years of trial.

“The case presented by the prosecution has no weight whatsoever,” the judge ruled.

Justice Omotosho described the anti-graft agency’s case as one “built on the quicksand of speculations, suspicions and shoddy investigation.”

He added that the prosecution failed to establish the predicate offences required to prove money laundering allegations.

“Crucial elements of money laundering offences, which are the establishment of a predicate offence, were glaringly absent in this case presented by the prosecution,” he said.

The judge held that the prosecution failed to prove that funds allegedly traced to Oyo-Ita were proceeds of unlawful activities.

According to him, evidence before the court showed that contracts linked to the allegations were duly approved and executed.

He also held that estacodes, duty tour allowances and air tickets allegedly received by Oyo-Ita were properly approved.

“There is no proof before the court that estacodes or duty allowances were approved and subsequently collected without the corresponding trips being undertaken,” the judge said.

He faulted the prosecution for failing to tender travel approvals, official memos, audit queries or other documentary evidence to support its allegations.

“The prosecution has, in effect, invited the court to engage in speculation,” he added.

See also  FG issues final call for health fellows programme applications

Justice Omotosho further held that Oyo-Ita was neither a director nor shareholder in the companies allegedly linked to the transactions under investigation.

“The prosecution did not provide any shred of evidence to show that the monies are tainted with illegality,” the judge ruled.

He subsequently upheld the no-case submissions filed by all the defendants and discharged and acquitted them on the 18-count charge.

The EFCC had arraigned Oyo-Ita and others in March 2020 over allegations bordering on fraud involving duty tour allowances, estacodes and contract kickbacks amounting to about N570m.

During the trial, the commission called eight witnesses and tendered documentary exhibits.

However, the defendants argued that the prosecution failed to establish any ingredient of the offences to warrant them entering a defence.

Justice Omotosho also rejected confessional statements allegedly obtained from Oyo-Ita and some co-defendants, ruling that they were not obtained in compliance with provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

He held that the prosecution failed to produce video recordings of the statement-taking sessions as required by law and consequently expunged the statements from evidence.

Oyo-Ita was removed from office by the administration of the late President Muhammadu Buhari in September 2019, amid corruption allegations.

Continue Reading

News

Missing Ebonyi engineers’ families demand fresh probe

Published

on

Wives of five engineers linked to NELAN Consulting have rejected recent comments by the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing him of attempting to “sweep the truth under the carpet” over the disappearance and presumed killing of their husbands in 2021.

In a strongly worded rejoinder signed by the wives of the engineers, namely Mrs Patricia Onyemeh, Mrs Lovette Edeani, Mrs Ifeoma Ejiofor, Mrs Esther Aneke, and Mrs Nwazulum, the women said Umahi’s response failed to address “grave factual and moral concerns that have persisted for nearly five years.”

The statement follows Umahi’s March 16, 2026, response in which he reportedly linked the engineers’ disappearance to communal unrest.

But the families disputed this, insisting that “the characterisation of the disappearance of the five engineers… as a general consequence of communal crisis is completely outrageous, misconceived, misrepresented, and flawed.”

The engineers, who were supervising an African Development Bank-backed ring road project in Ebonyi State, went missing on November 3, 2021, during Umahi’s tenure as governor.

According to the families, their husbands had travelled for an official meeting arranged by the state government, and were last seen in connection with the project.

“Credible accounts indicate that the victims were last seen in connection with official engagements linked to the Ebonyi Ring Road project,” the statement read, raising “legitimate questions” about attempts to attribute the incident to communal violence.

The wives alleged irregularities in the handling of the case by security agencies, particularly the Department of State Services and the Nigeria Police Force.

See also  Kano, Guinea-Bissau strengthen ties on tourism, others

They questioned why a DSS investigator, identified as Victor Chijioke Onyesom, was “suddenly sacked at the peak of his investigation,” alleging that he had been tracking communications linked to the case.

“Who influenced the conspiracy to terminate the investigation at DSS?” they asked.

The families also faulted the police for presenting skeletal remains without conducting DNA verification.

“The police presented them to the family as remains of the victims, but refused to do a DNA test.

“The test further showed that one of the five skeletal remains belonged to a female, whereas the five missing engineers are all men,” the statement said.

It further accused authorities of rushing to file charges against six suspects without concluding investigations or producing bodies.

“Without a doubt, the conspiracy in hurriedly filing the purported charge… was to tactically close the investigation… and shield the real culprits,” the wives said.

They added: “Where are the bodies of our husbands? You arrested their killers.”

The families also alleged intimidation after petitioning top government officials, including President Bola Tinubu, Senate President Godswill Akpabio, and House Speaker Tajudeen Abbas.

According to them, “an undisclosed person… threatened us not to push further for the reinvestigation of the case.”

Rejecting Umahi’s position outright, the wives said: “We totally reject David Umahi’s responses as misconceived and unfounded,” citing “interference in the investigative process, the sudden termination of the investigation, the removal of key investigators, and the suppression of critical evidence.”

They described the case as a “whitewash, cover-up, mischief, conspiracy, and plot to use the court to foreclose investigation.”

See also  Protest Breaks Out In Lagos Over Renaming Of Streets, Bus Stops

The families called on the President, National Assembly leadership, and civil society groups to compel security agencies to reopen the case.

“We will have no option but to embark on another protest if the investigation is not reopened.

“The blood of our dear husbands will never go in vain,” the wives said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending