Connect with us

Politics

Anyanwu expulsion battle: Zonal leaders plot PDP takeover

Published

on

The protracted leadership crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has taken a dramatic new turn, with zonal chairmen of the party signalling their readiness to assume interim national leadership should the courts uphold the expulsion of National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, and nullify key conventions tied to his actions.

As rival factions continue to trade legal blows, several zonal leaders confided in Sunday PUNCH that they are prepared to invoke the doctrine of necessity to prevent a total leadership vacuum.

They plan to appoint an acting National Chairman and acting National Secretary from among themselves and other surviving National Working Committee members whose tenures remain intact.

One zonal chairman, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the time had come for decisive internal intervention to halt the endless crises that have weakened the main opposition party.

“It is high time we put a final stop to all these crises. The zonal chairmen are not just there; we are part of the NWC and we have the mandate to stabilise the party,” the chairman stated.

He added, “While not predicting the outcome of the pending Supreme Court ruling on Anyanwu’s legitimacy to organise the March 30, 2026 convention, NWC members, particularly the zonal chairmen, will step in to offer national leadership in an acting capacity.

“If the court upholds Anyanwu’s expulsion and the nullification of the Ibadan convention, it means there will be a leadership vacuum. Anyanwu, as an expelled member of the PDP, cannot act for or on behalf of the party. You cannot build something on nothing. Since he wrote INEC to notify the commission of the Wike-backed convention, the court may declare his actions a nullity if he is no longer a party member.

“If both conventions are nullified, then we will have to step in. What I mean is that the zonal chairmen and other NWC members whose tenure have not expired will come together and appoint, among ourselves, an acting National Chairman and National Secretary. Two of us have discussed this, and we need to step up efforts in that direction.”

See also  You Are A One-term President, Stop Plotting To Stay – ADC Tackles Tinubu

Another zonal chairman echoed the sentiment, noting that providing leadership at such a critical moment would serve the best interest of the party.

“We don’t know what the court will say about the two conventions, so it may be premature to make plans. But despite that, NWC members are constitutionally recognised, and our functions are clearly spelt out.

“A doctrine of necessity may arise from these legal issues. If we do not have any legally recognised leadership, then steps may be taken to provide direction for the party. But we must wait and not preempt the court,” he said.

However, the North-East Zonal Chairman, Babangida Maddibo, counselled restraint.

“Let us wait for the outcome of the Supreme Court on the cases. We shouldn’t put the cart before the horse. When we get to the bridge, we will cross it,” Maddibo told Sunday PUNCH.

Turaki faction writes INEC

The zonal leaders’ positioning comes against the backdrop of fresh pressure mounted by the Tanimu Turaki-led faction on the Independent National Electoral Commission.

In a strongly worded letter dated April 16, 2026, and addressed to INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan, the faction’s counsel, Abdullahi Ibrahim, SAN, demanded the immediate derecognition of Anyanwu as a party member and National Secretary.

The letter drew INEC’s attention to the January 12, 2026 judgment of the Federal Capital Territory High Court delivered by Justice Yusuf Halilu in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1050/2025, which dismissed Anyanwu’s suit and affirmed his expulsion from the PDP.

The Turaki faction argued that Anyanwu ceased to be a member of the party from the date of his expulsion and therefore lacked the competence to act on its behalf in any capacity.

The counsel emphasised that the filing of a notice of appeal on April 10, 2026, does not constitute a stay of execution, meaning the High Court judgment remains subsisting and enforceable under Section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

The letter read in part, “Senator Samuel Anyanwu has ceased to be a member and officer of the Peoples Democratic Party and has no competence to act on behalf of the party in any capacity whatsoever since his expulsion… By implication, the judgment dismissing his case remains subsisting and in force, and the commission has a constitutional obligation to enforce, comply with, and implement the judgment… even without prompting from the Peoples Democratic Party.”

See also  ADC Reps caucus demands INEC chair removal

The faction described INEC’s continued recognition of Anyanwu as an affront to the judiciary and urged the commission to expunge all recognitions granted to him since January 12, 2026, including any correspondences, notices, and his listing on the INEC portal as PDP National Secretary.

The crisis traces back to March 10, 2025, when the PDP’s National Disciplinary Committee recommended Anyanwu’s expulsion for alleged anti-party activities.

This was reportedly ratified by the party leadership at the time.

On November 15, 2025, during the controversial Ibadan national convention, the PDP under then Acting National Chairman Umar Damagum expelled Anyanwu alongside prominent figures such as Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Nyesom Wike and former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose for similar reasons.

Courts later nullified the Ibadan convention.

Anyanwu, aligned with the Wike faction, approached the FCT High Court in Suit No. CV/1050/2025 seeking redress.

On January 12, 2026, Justice Halilu dismissed the suit in its entirety.

Undeterred, Anyanwu filed an appeal on April 10, 2026, at the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal, challenging the High Court ruling.

Despite the legal cloud, Anyanwu, acting in his capacity as National Secretary, played a pivotal role in organising the Wike-backed national convention held on March 29-30, 2026, in Abuja.

That convention produced Abdulrahman Mohammed as National Chairman and retained Anyanwu as National Secretary.

INEC subsequently recognised the Mohammed-led National Working Committee and updated its records accordingly.

Wike camp fires back

The Wike-aligned faction has pushed back strongly, describing media reports on Anyanwu’s expulsion as misleading.

In a statement on Saturday, the faction’s National Publicity Secretary, Jungudo Mohammed, insisted that no valid suspension or expulsion ever took effect.

He explained that the Tom Ikimi Disciplinary Committee only made a recommendation for suspension, which was never reviewed, adopted, or ratified by either the National Working Committee or the National Executive Committee.

“The suit, which was first initiated at the FCT High Court, Abuja, was filed to challenge the competence and proceedings of the Disciplinary Committee previously chaired by Mr. Tom Ikimi, who has since left the PDP,” the statement noted.

See also  Attack scare: Police deploy officers to top Lagos schools

Mohammed emphasised that the committee was constituted in violation of Chapter 10, Article 57(1) of the PDP constitution, rendering its recommendations non-binding. He added that the FCT High Court judgment did not affirm any suspension or expulsion, as that was never the core issue before the court; rather, the suit was struck out partly on jurisdictional grounds concerning internal party discipline.

The faction further clarified that the appeal filed on April 10 was “inadvertently” lodged and has since been directed to be withdrawn immediately, as it was no longer necessary. It maintained that the Abuja convention of March 29-30, 2026, was conducted with full legal backing in line with valid court judgments and was duly monitored by INEC.

Potential collapse of structures

Speaking on the Turaki faction’s letter to INEC, its spokesperson Ini Ememobong warned of dire consequences if Anyanwu’s expulsion is upheld.

“The so-called caretaker committee is in limbo… If the court upholds Anyanwu’s expulsion, it would mean everything built on him will collapse like a pack of cards. It affects the so-called National Working Committee,” Ememobong said.

He pointed out that Anyanwu signed critical notices to INEC, including those for NEC meetings and the convention itself. “So everything will collapse on them,” he added.

Legal experts, who spoke with Sunday PUNCH on condition of anonymity, largely agreed that an upheld expulsion would pose serious challenges.

A Lagos-based Senior Advocate of Nigeria described it as common sense.

He said, “Someone who is not part of a family cannot act on behalf of that family. If his expulsion is upheld… then all his actions may be nullified because an expelled member no longer has legal standing within the party.”

Another lawyer, however, cautioned against hasty conclusions, stressing the importance of due process.

He said, “Were the processes leading to the reported expulsion transparent? Was he given a fair hearing? Were all legal requirements followed? These are critical questions.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Abia ADC chair retains position, vows to unseat Otti

Published

on

Don Norman Obinna on Friday in Umuahia retained his position as the state chairman of the African Democratic Congress in Abia State, and vowed to unseat Governor Alex Otti in the 2027 governorship election.

His emergence followed the state congress of the party held in Umuahia by the Abia Congress Committee led by Chioma Cynthia Ladeinde as chairman, while Agodi Kanu emerged as secretary.

Naomi Nwogu and Gold Mbamaghionyeukwu emerged as the state Woman Leader and Deputy Woman Leader respectively.

Addressing journalists, Obinna said the congress followed the April 29 judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which, according to him, clarified the conduct of party congresses under Article 17 of the ADC Constitution.

“So all we did was to go back to our states and execute or implement the court judgments

“We wrote to INEC, Abuja, because it is a court judgment, a court order. We wrote to them and they know that we held the congresses today, and they were there,” he said.

The congress began on Thursday with ward and local government congresses, while the state congress was held on Friday.

“By the grace of God, it was an affirmation that I was returned as the ADC Chairman of the state”, he said, adding that a representative of INEC observed the process.

He further stated that consultations were held with electoral authorities ahead of the exercise.

“We held an extensive meeting with them yesterday. We sent a letter to them. They are aware of this congress because they had to obey the court order, the court judgment, which was delivered in favour of the state chairman,” he said.

See also  Court defers Nnamdi Kanu’s transfer appeal, rejects brother’s representation

Obinna said the congress was conducted in line with Article 17 of the ADC constitution.

“It is in our constitution. So what we did today was in line with the ADC constitution and also in line with the court judgment. Because the reason we took David Marks National Working Committee to court was not to challenge the leadership.

“Rather, we went to court to ask the court to interpret the ADC constitution, article 17 of the ADC constitution, to determine whose constitutional right it is to conduct congresses. And the court in that wisdom, after producing through our constitution, gave a judgment that it is the ADC state chairman and the National Working Committee and the state executive committee that have the right to conduct congresses. And that was what we did today”, he said.

He insisted that the party has no factions in the state.

Continue Reading

Politics

Halt sales of nomination forms, Bala tells ADC

Published

on

The Nafiu Bala faction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has asked the David Mark-led leadership to halt the sale of Expression of Interest and Nomination Forms pending the determination of a suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The development came as the Federal High Court in Abuja adjourned indefinitely the leadership suit filed by Bala after the plaintiff applied for the transfer of the case to another judge.

In a statement issued in Abuja on Friday, May 8, 2026 the Secretary of the ADC Board of Trustees, Rufus Akanmi, said the need to stop the sale of the forms formed part of resolutions reached at the party’s BoT meeting held on Thursday.

He warned that anyone proceeding with the purchase of nomination forms despite the directive would be doing so at their own risk.

Akanmi said, “All parties concerned are directed to immediately suspend the sale/purchase of such forms pending the final determination of the matter presently before the Federal High Court.

“It is expressly stated that any person who proceeds to purchase the said forms does so at their own risk, and the African Democratic Congress shall not accept any liability or responsibility for consequences arising therefrom,” he said.

The faction also commended the Supreme Court for its April 30, 2026 judgment, describing the verdict as a landmark contribution to constitutional democracy and the rule of law within Nigeria’s political system.

Akanmi urged members of the coalition within the party and the Mark’s faction to set aside partisan interests and collaborate with the Gombe-led leadership in the interest of party unity.

According to him, such cooperation was necessary to guarantee the party’s effective participation in the forthcoming general elections and ensure the emergence of credible candidates for elective offices at the state, local government and ward levels.

See also  Tinubu’s New Year message (Full Text)

“The Board hereby directs the National Working Committee to constitute Caretaker Committees in all states where the tenure of the current State Executive Committees has expired, to ensure continuity and stability in party administration at the grassroots level.

“We further direct the National Working Committee to immediately initiate processes for the convening of a Mini National Convention, for the purpose of filling all vacant positions arising from the recent resignation of certain members of the NWC, in accordance with the Constitution of the party,” he added.

Meanwhile, proceedings in the substantive leadership suit suffered another setback on Friday after Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja adjourned the matter indefinitely.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, had earlier been stalled following an interlocutory appeal filed by David Mark, which eventually went to the Supreme Court.

At Friday’s proceedings, counsel for the plaintiff, Luka Musa Haruna, informed the court that the Supreme Court on April 30 dismissed the interlocutory appeal for lacking merit and set aside the Court of Appeal’s order staying proceedings in the substantive suit.

“The interlocutory appeal of the 2nd defendant has travelled to the Supreme Court. My Lord, we are glad to inform this honourable court that on the 30th day of April 2026, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the interlocutory appeal dismissing the said appeal for lacking in merit,” he said.

Haruna, however, disclosed that the plaintiff had through a letter dated May 4, 2026 applied to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for the transfer of the case to another judge.

He said the letter had already been transmitted to the court registrar and urged Justice Nwite to await the administrative decision of the Chief Judge.

See also  Cameroon President Biya appoints his son as vice president, hands him military command

“At this juncture, we must humbly pray to your Lordship to wait for the administrative decision of the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Haruna said.

The request drew stiff opposition from the defence team, which accused the plaintiff of attempting to frustrate the accelerated hearing earlier ordered by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court.

Counsel for the first defendant, Realwan Okpanachi, who held brief for S.E. Aruwa, argued that the plaintiff had misrepresented the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment.

According to him, the apex court partially allowed the appeal and specifically upheld the appellate court’s order directing accelerated hearing of the case.

Okpanachi further faulted the plaintiff for allegedly ambushing the defendants with the transfer request.

“We have not received any communication regarding that application. My Lord, so as it is, we don’t know the form or the content of that application. Therefore, we take the approach of the plaintiff as an ambush

“We also consider it as an attempt to frustrate the order of accelerated hearing granted by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court,” he added.

Counsel for the second defendant, Sulaiman Usman, also condemned the plaintiff’s move, describing it as “forum shopping and judge shopping.”

Usman told the court that the Supreme Court had commended Justice Nwite “in glowing terms” over his handling of the proceedings.

“So my Lord, for the plaintiffs to come back to this court, and to inform us today that they have written a private correspondence to the Honourable Chief Judge, and to hinge that to make a request for this court to await the outcome of that private correspondence, is not only unfortunate My Lord, but a dangerous trend which must not be allowed to stand,” he said.

See also  ADC Reps caucus demands INEC chair removal

Counsel for the third defendant, M.E. Sherriff, aligned himself with the submissions of the first and second defendants, arguing that substantive prayers could not be sought through ordinary letters.

Similarly, counsel for the fifth defendant, P.I. Oyewole, described the application as “strange” and accused the plaintiff of inviting the Chief Judge “to indulge in judicial rascality.”

“My Lord, asking the Chief Judge to transfer that kind of case is worse than forum shopping,” Oyewole argued.

Responding, Haruna faulted the defence for attacking a letter they had not seen, insisting that the plaintiff stood by its application.

Justice Nwite subsequently held that the court could not take any decision on the letter without hearing all parties.

“Taking a decision or any action in such a letter without hearing from the defendants will amount to breach of their fundamental right in this suit,” the judge ruled.

He added that since the letter was addressed to the Chief Judge, the trial court could not make any pronouncement on it.

“This matter is best adjourned sine die to afford the parties properly file a Certified True Copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the interlocutory appeal in the suit, to serve the defendants with the letter addressed to the Honourable Chief Judge, and finally to await further or any directive from the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Justice Nwite said.

The matter was thereafter adjourned indefinitely.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fani-Kayode, Omokri oppose return of power to North before 2031

Published

on

Two of President Bola Tinubu’s ambassador-designates, Femi Fani-Kayode and Reno Omokri have declared that returning power to Northern Nigeria after only one southern term would be unpatriotic and a betrayal of the rotation pact that has anchored Nigeria’s democracy since 1999.

They added that it would also be a slight against the man who was the chief architect of the North’s return to power in 2015.

Ambassador-designate to South Africa, Fani-Kayode, and Ambassador-designate to Mexico, Omokri, made the declaration in a joint statement on Saturday, endorsing Tinubu for re-election in 2027.

The two allies argued that the North had enjoyed two full, uninterrupted terms under former President Muhammadu Buhari, with southern support, and that equity demanded the South be allowed a commensurate two terms before any power shift.

“We view it as unpatriotic and inimical to the unity, equilibrium, and progress of Nigeria for anyone to even conceive of power returning to Northern Nigeria after only one term of four years, during which it was domiciled in Southern Nigeria,” they said.

They noted that the South’s current hold on power was not incidental but deliberate.

They added, “Not just in Southern Nigeria, but in the specific hands of the man who was the chief architect for the return of power to the North in 2015.”

On the principle of reciprocity, they were unambiguous.

“We are of the opinion that one good turn deserves another and that one good term deserves another,” they said.

The statement described the gentleman’s agreement on rotation as the bedrock of Nigeria’s post-military stability.

“It is in the best interest of the stability, unity, and prosperity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and in keeping with the Gentleman’s Agreement which ushered in our Fourth Republic in 1999, after sixteen years of turbulence and political instability, for there to be a balanced and orderly rotation of power in Nigeria between the North and the South,” they said.

See also  Cameroon President Biya appoints his son as vice president, hands him military command

They added that Northern Nigeria, having “completed and made full and unfettered use of two terms of four years under the Muhammadu Buhari administration,” had exhausted its turn in the rotation and must now yield.

On performance, the statement credited Tinubu with 12 consecutive cycles of GDP growth and trade surpluses, saying he had added “$67 billion to our economy” and made “Nigeria the sixth largest contributor to global GDP growth in 2025.”

The designates also pointed to infrastructure under the Renewed Hope Agenda as proof of a unifying presidency. They called on all Nigerians to back the president’s re-election.

“Finally, we call on all Nigerians, irrespective of region, religion, and communion, to join us and queue behind the present Presidency and future candidacy of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the Renewed Hope Agenda, which has seen infrastructural efforts to unite Nigeria, including the ₦15 trillion 750-kilometre Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, the ₦13 trillion 1068-kilometre Illela-Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and bridging the gap between the Southeast and the entire North through the 465-kilometre Trans-Saharan Road being constructed at a cost of an estimated $750 million.

“If we all extend the right hand of fellowship to President Bola Tinubu, we will, with the help of God, collectively see Nigeria become a $1 trillion economy by 2031,” they said.

Citing Switzerland as a model, they argued that structured power-sharing had kept the Alpine nation stable and conflict-free for over two centuries.

“The reason Switzerland has been stable, peaceful, and prosperous for the last 211 years is because that Alpine nation wisely introduced power sharing amongst its multiethnic population and has not seen any conflict since 1815,” they said.

See also  PDP Releases Timetable For National Convention [Full Details]

The statement ended on a rallying note. “To re-elect President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a task that must be done,” they declared.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending