Connect with us

Politics

Atiku ’s three-decade quest for Aso Villa, analyzed

Published

on

Long before Atiku Abubakar became a household name across Nigeria, he had been nurturing presidential ambitions that have not lasted for three decades. When the military administration of Ibrahim Babangida initiated the 1993 transition programme, Atiku threw his hat into the ring within the Social Democratic Party (SDP), contesting the presidential primaries against the business mogul, Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, popularly known as MKO Abiola, and Baba Gana Kingibe. He came third, a distant but telling debut.

That primary loss did not discourage him. Instead, it sharpened his political instincts and expanded his network. When the June 12, 1993 election was annulled and Nigeria descended into political chaos, Atiku retreated to consolidate his business interests and bide his time. The ambition, however, never died.

By 1998, the Adamawa-born politician had won the governorship of the state, only to be persuaded almost immediately to step aside in favour of a bigger prize — becoming vice president under General Olusegun Obasanjo (rtd) on the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) platform. For eight years, Atiku occupied Nigeria’s second-highest political office, presiding over privatisation, managing the economy, and building one of the most formidable political networks the country had ever seen.

Yet even as Vice President, the tension between his ambitions and those of his principal was palpable. Atiku quietly built his own base, one so formidable that, at a point, he reportedly commanded the loyalty of more state governors than the President himself.

The 2007 fall-out

The relationship between Obasanjo and his Vice was never entirely warm, and eventually collapsed dramatically. The rupture came over Obasanjo’s alleged attempt to secure a third term through constitutional amendment, a bid Atiku helped defeat. The President retaliated by engineering Atiku’s suspension from the PDP and alleged corruption charges that led the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to initially omit his name from the 2007 presidential ballot.

Atiku fought back through the courts with remarkable tenacity. The Supreme Court of Nigeria ultimately upheld his right to contest the election. However, Atiku decided to eye Aso Villa from the Action Congress (AC), and later placed third behind the PDP’s Umaru Yar’Adua and the ANPP’s Muhammadu Buhari, securing roughly seven percent of the vote — a creditable showing for a candidate who had nearly been barred from the race entirely.

After Yar’Adua won, Atiku quietly returned to the PDP. By 2010, and head of the 2011 general elections, he was again declared the Northern Consensus Candidate by a committee of elders, ahead of former military President Ibrahim Babangida and others.

See also  Suspected thugs disrupt Ondo Speaker’s impeachment bid

2011 and 2015: The internal battles

In the 2011 presidential primary, Atiku faced incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan — who is seeking his first direct shot at the presidency after Yar’Adua’s demise, a contest Atiku lost within the PDP.

Before 2015, Atiku had joined forces for a merger majorly formed by three political parties that metamorphosed into the All Progressives Congress (APC). The former Vice President threw his hat in the ring again for the party’s ticket against 2015. This time, the odds favoured Muhammadu Buhari (now late), who had crossed from the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) to flag APC flag against the PDP’s incumbent Goodluck Jonathan gunning for a second term.

Each loss reinforced a curious paradox — Atiku was consistently powerful enough to reach the final stages of the race, yet consistently unable to win it.

2019: The race he almost won

The 2019 presidential election represented Atiku’s most credible performance. Returning home to run again on the PDP platform was a calculus he perfected in 2017. This time, after a well-managed party’s primary victory, Atiku secured over 11 million votes, which was 39 per cent of the total votes, against President Buhari’s 15 million. Atiku believed he won the poll Supreme Court, after a long, suspenseful legal battle, upheld Buhari’s victory, but the margin had narrowed considerably. Nigeria’s opposition had finally found its voice, and Atiku was its standard-bearer.

Unlike 2015, when Buhari enjoyed a wider acceptability, many observers believed 2019 was the election that should have been Atiku’s. The economy under ‘Sai Baba’ was struggling, security was deteriorating, and the incumbent was visibly frail. Yet the combination of incumbency advantages, voter suppression allegations, and deep North-South political faultlines conspired, his supporters argued, against a fair outcome.

Atiku in 2023 ‘youth revolution’

The 2023 election introduced a new dynamic that proved fatal to Atiku’s chances. The emergence of Labour Party’s Peter Obi as a powerful third-force candidate shattered the traditional two-party contest. The Obi’s candidacy reawakened sheer civic engagement that saw seeming revolutionary tempest by young Nigerians, mobilised under the #ObiDatti movement, to oust the reigns of the old parties.

Atiku, despite winning the PDP primary, found himself squeezed between Bola Tinubu of the APC, Peter Obi of the LP who was his 2019 vice presidential candidate, and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso of the New Nigeria People’s party (NNPP). He came second in what became one of Nigeria’s most litigated elections.

See also  Abiodun, Osoba, Amosun, Daniel endorse Yayi Ogun APC gov candidate

The irony was inescapable; the very forces of democratic energy that Atiku had championed — civil society, youth activism, anti-incumbency sentiment — had turned against his own bid, flowing instead toward a fresher face.

2027: Eyes on the goal

In a move that stunned Nigeria’s political establishment, Atiku Abubakar left home — the PDP — again in 2025, to join in the cooking of another APC-coalition in the African Democratic Congress (ADC). More remarkably, he did so alongside his running mate-turned-rival, Peter Obi and PDP’s homeboy, Kwankwaso. The three men, whose competing candidacies in 2023 arguably split the opposition votes and handed victory to the incumbent President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, appeared finally to have taken the lesson for united front to Aso Villa.

Tribune Online reports that opposition political parties in Nigeria, after a recent summit in Ibadan, agreed to present a sole presidential candidate to rival President Tinubu in the 2027 election. Could this be Atiku?

Meanwhile, the alliance is historic. It unites the North-South, Muslim-Christian symbolism that Nigerian politics demands, and brings together most experienced opposition politicians of their generation.

Political scientists and a professor, Bolaji Omitola, had noted the absence of an extensive state-level structure for the ADC, particularly in the South-South and South-East, which undercuts its national ambition. “Without such foundations,” he said, the party “risks being dismissed as another Abuja coalition rather than a mass movement.” Whether it can withstand the centrifugal pressures of ego, ethnic balance, and party dynamics remains the central question of the 2027 election cycle.

Should Atiku secure the ticket to contest in 2027, he will be 80 years old on election day. Critics are already raising the age question with renewed urgency. Nigeria, a country with a median age of just 18 years, has an overwhelmingly young electorate increasingly impatient with recycled political figures. The same youth energy that powered the #EndSARS protests of 2020 and the Obidient movement of 2022 is unlikely to be easily harnessed by an octogenarian candidate.

What drives the man?

Political psychologists and analysts who have studied Atiku’s career point to several interlocking motivations. There is, first, the simple and unashamed personal ambition of a self-made man who rose from poverty in Jada to the highest offices in the land and sees the presidency as the natural culmination of a remarkable life story.

Atiku confirmed in a recent interview with Arise TV that he would not contest again after this: “Certainly, yes. Because I believe that will be my last outing. That is incontrovertible,” he admitted.

See also  Makinde best opposition presidential candidate, says Lagos APM ahead of 2027 elections

Responding to questions about whether his candidacy represents the future or the past, Abubakar argued that leadership requires a balance of both experience and generational renewal.

While Olaniyi Ajibola, Public Policy Analyst, said, “I represent both the past and the future. We have seen various levels of leadership, both young and old. I believe expectations of young leadership have been below what we thought; they require experience and tutelage from the older generation. Sometimes you need to be in power to give that tutelage,” he noted.

“Going by the accounts of individuals that are very close to Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, I can safely conclude that the rationale behind his presidential ambition since over three decades is more spiritual than logical.”

“Obviously, every spiritual phenomenon is mostly physically illogical, so, many Nigerians are not convinced about what drives him since 1992. He has never come up with any brilliant alternative policies to better the lives of Nigerians nor creative ideas for economic growth. He must have been listening to some voices beyond the terrestrial realm.”

“He has run six times. He has lost six times. He is probably going to run again. At what point does determination become something else entirely? You would be a fool to write him off. People have been writing off Atiku Abubakar since 1993. He is still here, still talking, still building alliances.”

The verdict of history

Whatever the outcome of 2027, Atiku Abubakar’s place in the annals of Nigerian political history is already secured not as president, but as the most tenacious presidential aspirant the Fourth Republic has produced. He has outlasted Obasanjo’s hostility, survived INEC’s attempts to exclude him, weathered U.S. Senate corruption investigations, and watched rivals rise and fall while continuing his own march.

The question Nigeria must answer in 2027 is not whether Atiku has earned the right to try once more. By any measure, he has. Nigeria’s political story is full of men who waited too long, who held on past the moment when the country was ready for them. Whether Atiku is one of them, or whether 2027 finally delivers what thirty years of effort could not, that is the question hanging over Nigerian politics heading into the next election cycle — and may be answered with ADC presidential primary.

tribuneonlineng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

No quarrel with Soludo, says Peter Obi on Anambra debt

Published

on

Former Anambra State Governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has said he has no disagreement with his successor, Chukwuma Soludo, declaring that he will not seek the governorship of any state again.

Obi made the clarification on Friday while responding to issues that had recently generated public discussion, including the controversy over the financial obligations associated with projects implemented during his tenure as Anambra governor.

The former governor, who said he had remained silent in recent days because he was mourning his late elder brother and friend, Chief Okey Ezeibe, said he was not interested in returning to the governorship, even if the Constitution was amended.

“I wish to assure the public that I have no disagreement with my dear elder brother, Governor Soludo, or with any governor in Nigeria. I am not seeking the office of governor in any state, and I will not seek that position again, even if the Constitution is amended”, he stated.

Obi also appealed to governors to allow presidential candidates and other contestants to campaign freely in their states, irrespective of their political affiliations. He said, “Accordingly, I appeal to governors to support whichever presidential candidate they choose while also permitting and assisting other presidential candidates and contenders for other offices to campaign freely and without interruption in their states. Ultimately, voters should be allowed to determine whom they wish to serve them.”

He added that political actors should focus on the challenges confronting Nigerians rather than engage in distractions.

See also  2027: MURIC seeks religious balance, urges Ogun Christians to support Muslim candidate

“On the Anambra debt question, I have remained silent over the past few days because I have been grieving the loss of my very dear elder brother and friend, Chief Okey Ezeibe. However, the time has come for me to address some of the matters that have occupied public discussion in recent days. I respectfully urge everyone to concentrate on the existential challenges confronting Nigeria and the hardships endured by its citizens, rather than on the needless distractions that have become widespread in our politics.”

His comments came amid a disagreement between the Anambra State Government and Obi over external borrowings associated with projects undertaken during his administration. https://punchng.com/anambra-govt-counters-obi-alleges-n127bn-124m-debt/

The state government had said eight external borrowings linked to projects during Obi’s tenure had a combined contracted value of $123.77m, with $92.35m outstanding as of June 30, 2026, based on figures from the Debt Management Office.

Obi rejected the characterisation of the facilities as “debt owed by Peter Obi”, saying they were primarily World Bank and International Fund for Agricultural Development development programmes negotiated by the Federal Government and accessed by participating states through subsidiary arrangements.

He said the figures being cited should be separated into the amount approved, the amount actually drawn and the balance outstanding when he left office. “The government has combined these distinct categories, added them together, and described the resulting US$123.77 million as ‘loans left by Peter Obi.’ That is an incorrect application of public-sector accounting”, he argued.

Obi further maintained that he did not personally approach any financial institution to borrow funds or issue a bond on behalf of the state. He said, “Regarding the multilateral funding inaccurately described as ‘debt owed by Peter Obi’ in Anambra State, I wish to state unequivocally, as Governor of Anambra State, I did not approach any financial institution to borrow funds or issue a bond on behalf of the state.

See also  Tinubu, APC Will Win Massively In Southwest – Lawmaker

“Indeed, at his farewell ceremony, the then Director-General of the DMO, Abraham Nwankwo, appointed me chairman and declared that, during his 10 years in office, I was the only state governor who had not approached him for a loan facility.”

He also said his administration left no unpaid salaries, gratuities or pensions, and no verified debts owed to contractors or suppliers. “When I left office, the Anambra State Government owed no unpaid salaries, gratuities, or pensions. Neither did it owe any contractor or supplier who had completed work that the government had verified and certified.”

Obi said the issues surrounding the development financing should be considered in the context of how the facilities were approved, accessed and repaid.

“The eight facilities identified were primarily World Bank and IFAD development programs negotiated by the Federal Government, with participating states receiving access to the funds through subsidiary arrangements. They were not conventional commercial loans that I personally secured during my tenure. This does not suggest that Anambra had no repayment responsibilities; rather, each facility must be examined in light of its approval, effectiveness, drawdown, and repayment record”, he explained.

He also cited Debt Management Office figures for Anambra’s external debt at different points, questioning how the $123.77m figure attributed to his administration was arrived at.

“The clearest contradiction appears in the government’s own figures. It states that the original facilities amounted to approximately US$123.77 million and that US$92.35 million remained outstanding in June 2026. However, the DMO’s published records showed Anambra’s total external debt at approximately US$18 million when I began my tenure in March 2006, about US$30 million in March 2014, when I left office, and approximately US$45.15 million as of 31 December 2014, nine months after my departure.

See also  ADC Reps caucus demands INEC chair removal

“The Anambra State Government must therefore clarify how a state whose recorded external debt was about US$30 million in March 2014 and US$45.15 million in December 2014 could supposedly have inherited US$123.77 million from Peter Obi, who left office in March of that same year”, he concluded.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Moghalu rejects Atiku campaign appointment ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

A former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Kingsley Moghalu, has rejected his inclusion in the policy team of the African Democratic Congress presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, for the 2027 election.

Moghalu, in a statement posted on his X handle on Thursday, said he was neither consulted nor asked for his consent before his name was published as a member of Atiku’s campaign policy team.

His reaction came hours after Atiku’s campaign unveiled its Presidential Campaign Council, naming Moghalu among members of its Policy Team.

The team is chaired by economist and banker Mohammed Hayatudeen, with Professor Mohammed Sagagi as deputy chairman.

Atiku Abubakar
FILE: Atiku Abubakar

“I am surprised to see a statement from @atiku and @ADCNig campaign team including my name as a member of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s policy team for the 2027 presidential campaign.

“For the record: I was not consulted and did not give my consent to my name being published as a member of the ADC candidate’s policy team.

“I am NOT, in fact a member of Atiku’s policy team, even unofficially or in any advisory capacity,” Moghalu said.

Moghalu, who was a presidential candidate of the Young Progressives Party in the 2019 election, said he had quit partisan politics in Nigeria in 2022.

“I have quit partisan politics in Nigeria since 2022. I have maintained, and continue to maintain, my non-partisan posture in our country’s national affairs.

“I am not a member or sympathiser of any political party in Nigeria,” he said.

He said his current engagements included serving as president of the Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation, IGET Africa, which he described as a non-partisan public policy think tank and executive education academy, as well as Chief Executive Officer of Sogato Strategies, a geopolitical risk and regulatory strategy advisory firm.

See also  Lagos 2027: Hamzat begins consultations, meets GAC members

Moghalu said his decision to remain outside partisan politics did not mean he was disengaged from national affairs.

“I remain committed to my country, Nigeria and its progress, but such commitment does not have to entail ANY partisan alignment.

“I have adopted the path of statesmanship, not partisanship,” he said.

The clarification follows the unveiling of Atiku’s campaign structure on Thursday, with Kashim Ibrahim-Imam named chairman, former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai as deputy chairman and Senator Austin Akobundu as Director-General and Campaign Manager.

The campaign said its Policy Team would develop policy proposals addressing issues including the cost of living, unemployment, insecurity and declining purchasing power.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Benue PDP faults Alia over LG workers’ attendance register

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party in Benue State has condemned the directive issued by Governor Hyacinth Alia, ordering the 23 local government areas to maintain attendance registers for their workers.

The Benue State Local Government Service Commission, in a letter dated September 24, 2026, and signed by the Permanent Secretary, John Akume, on behalf of the chairman of the commission, had directed all LGAs to maintain daily staff attendance registers across departments.

The circular read, “I am directed to inform you that owing to the directives from His Excellency, the Executive Governor of Benue State, Rev. Dr Hyacinth Alia, all establishments in the state civil service are to keep and maintain attendance registers.

“To this end, all local government councils are directed to comply with the above directive by opening attendance registers for staff across Departments.

“These registers are to be opened and closed by Heads of Departments daily at 8:30 am, as only staff who attain the minimum punctuality of 25 days would be eligible for payment of salaries.”

The permanent secretary advised that all the local government councils must adhere strictly to the directive beginning from  October 1, 2026.

Reacting, the opposition PDP described the directive as “draconian and anti-worker.”

In a statement issued by the party’s state publicity secretary, Bright Antyo and made available to journalists in Makurdi on Thursday, the PDP said the directive negated the judgment of the Supreme Court, which affirmed the financial and administrative autonomy of local governments in Nigeria.

See also  Abiodun, Osoba, Amosun, Daniel endorse Yayi Ogun APC gov candidate

The PDP statement read, “This directive is not only draconian and anti-worker, but also a direct affront to the spirit and letter of the landmark Supreme Court judgment of July 2024, which affirmed the financial and administrative autonomy of local governments in Nigeria.

“Autonomy means independence. Autonomy means local governments should be free to take decisions concerning their administration, personnel management and internal operations without interference from the state government.

“A governor who genuinely believes in local government autonomy cannot simultaneously act as a supervisor, inspector, disciplinarian and paymaster of local government employees.”

The major opposition party in the state stated that the directive had exposed the contradiction between the governor’s public rhetoric and the reality on the ground.

“While the administration continues to celebrate supposed local government autonomy in public speeches, its actions reveal a desperate determination to retain control over affairs of the 23 councils through intimidation and despotic directives.

“Even more disturbing is the threat that workers who fail to meet a prescribed attendance requirement would be denied salaries.

“The authority to determine staff attendance, discipline workers and administer payroll belongs to the appropriate local government authorities, not the Governor’s Office or agencies acting on its behalf.

“Attempting to centralise such powers undermines the constitutional status of Local Governments and reduces elected council officials to mere spectators in the administration of their councils.”

The opposition PDP asked if the governor had been receiving directives from the Federal Government on how to administer the state.

The PDP said that with the directive, the third tier of government had been reduced to an appendage of the governor.

See also  Makinde best opposition presidential candidate, says Lagos APM ahead of 2027 elections

“They neither possess the practical freedom nor the financial capacity to award contracts independently.

“The governor runs the councils as extensions of his office, while any local government chairman who dares to complain or assert independence is swiftly suspended and eventually forced out of office,” the statement concluded.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending