Connect with us

News

Senate, SGF fault Makinde’s UN probe demand on Oyo abduction

Published

on

The Senate on Tuesday cautioned Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, over his call for a United Nations-led investigation into the abduction and rescue of 39 pupils and six teachers in the state, warning that such remarks could undermine the efforts of the Federal Government and security agencies in tackling insecurity.

The warning followed the consideration of a motion sponsored by the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, on the successful rescue of the victims after 56 days in captivity and the sacrifices made by security personnel during the operation.

The Senate also commended President Bola Tinubu, the Armed Forces, intelligence agencies and other security institutions for securing the release of the victims without the payment of ransom.

Also on Tuesday, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, faulted Makinde for what he described as politicising the abduction of pupils and teachers in Oyo State, insisting that Tinubu prioritised their rescue over making telephone calls.

Makinde had, on Monday, while formally assuming responsibility for the welfare, rehabilitation and education of the rescued teachers and pupils, called for a UN-backed investigation into the abduction, arguing that Nigerians deserved a full account of the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Bandits had on May 15, 2026, attacked three schools in Yawota and Ahoro Esiele communities in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State, abducting 39 pupils and six teachers.

Leading the criticism of the governor during plenary, the senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, described Makinde’s call as unnecessary and capable of diminishing the achievements of the security forces.

He said, “Mr President, I read it this morning in newspapers, and I have also seen it in the electronic media that the governor of Oyo State is calling on the United Nations to probe the overall circumstances surrounding the kidnap and even the rescue.

“I thought that was unsportsmanlike. He has carried partisan politics too far, and this Senate should condemn his unguarded statement.

“Nigeria is a sovereign nation. When we wake up and call on foreign authorities to investigate.

“This is one case in which our armed forces have shown that, without paying a ransom, even though it meant those children and some adults remained in captivity for almost two months, they worked quietly to carry out the rescue operation.

“As captured in this motion, the operation unfortunately resulted in the loss of some lives.

“To trivialise it or suggest, as Oyo governor seems to have done, that the UN needs to unearth the circumstances is to question the sovereignty of our nation, and to downplay the achievements of the Commander-in-Chief, President Bola Tinubu and all the service chiefs involved in this process.

“I think there is a moment in the history of this nation when, across party divides, we should stand in unity to commend the manner in which these victims were released and encourage the armed forces to build on it.

“It is not possible for them to share with us some of the things they did, like I heard they were able to identify the guys and arrest some of their relatives.

“I want us to resolve that the governor of Oyo State should not be seen as downplaying, undermining and politicising an issue that ought to be something the whole nation across party divides should commend the armed forces for what they have done on this occasion and continue to encourage them to do so.”

Oshiomhole’s position was seconded by Senator Aniekan Bassey, who represents Akwa Ibom North-East Senatorial District.

Consequently, the Senate resolved to urge the Oyo governor to avoid statements capable of undermining the ongoing efforts of the Federal Government and security agencies in addressing terrorism, kidnapping and other forms of insecurity.

In its resolutions, the upper chamber commended the Armed Forces, intelligence agencies and other security institutions for securing the release of the victims after more than 50 days in captivity.

See also  Investigation uncovers Col who plotted Tinubu’s ouster

The lawmakers also praised Tinubu for directing security agencies to deploy all necessary resources to ensure the unconditional release of the victims abducted by heavily armed terrorists.

According to the Senate, the rescue operation, which culminated in the victims’ release on July 10, 2026, led to the arrest of eight suspected terrorists, while several others were killed.

The Senate noted that the operation demonstrated growing professionalism, operational efficiency and improved inter-agency collaboration among the security agencies involved.

The lawmakers, however, paid tribute to security personnel who lost their lives during the operation.

They identified the fallen officers as Lt F.A. Isaac of the Nigerian Army, Private Silas Musa of the 81 Battalion of the Nigerian Army and Sgt Abena John Jerome of the Nigeria Police Force.

The Senate also recognised Lance Cpl Adamu Hussain, who sustained injuries during the rescue mission.

The chamber equally expressed sadness over the death of two of the abducted teachers while in captivity but described the successful rescue of the remaining victims as a major achievement that had restored hope among Nigerians, particularly parents and school communities.

The Senate urged the Federal Government to ensure the prompt payment of statutory death benefits, insurance claims, pensions and other entitlements due to the families of the deceased security personnel.

It also called for improved welfare, training, equipment and operational capacity for members of the Armed Forces, the Nigeria Police Force and other security agencies.

The lawmakers further urged the Federal Government to intensify military and intelligence operations against terrorists, kidnappers, bandits and other criminal groups through the provision of modern equipment, advanced surveillance technology, enhanced intelligence capabilities, improved logistics and better welfare packages for security personnel.

They also called on security agencies to sustain efforts to secure the release of other Nigerians still being held captive across the country.

In his statement on Tuesday, Akume said the President’s focus was on securing the release of the victims through intelligence-driven security operations rather than engaging in “public grandstanding.”

The statement released by the SGF’s media aide, Yomi Odunuga, said Akume spoke in Abuja while receiving members of the Global Association of Christian and Muslim Youth for Peace and Development led by its President, Peter Bassey.

Making an apparent reference to Makinde’s remarks, Akume said what was before the President was “more important than a telephone call.”

Akume was quoted as saying, “We live in a society where everything is politicised. Yes, we inherited difficult situations, but we are improving by the day.

“You could see the political sagacity and strategy of the President by ensuring the release of our dear ones who were held captive by these crooks.

“When the noise was rife that the President did not place a phone call to someone, it did not make sense. Would a telephone call to that person have resolved the case? Would those held captive have been released? No.

“It is the strategy being used to ensure the safety of those held in captivity that should be paramount. We should be interested in the release of these children and others. We should not be interested in a telephone call.”

Akume described Tinubu as “a doer” whose leadership is defined by action rather than rhetoric.

“This is why I tell people that Asiwaju (the President) is a doer. He is not a talker. He is like the Centurion of the old Roman Empire, whose services were rendered in deeds and not in words. His leadership is defined by action and results.

“Nigerians wanted to see the safe return of those innocent children and, today, they have been rescued through the strategic efforts of our security agencies under the President’s leadership. That is what matters,” he said.

See also  Senate reverses principal offices rule as Oshiomhole slams Akpabio

The SGF maintained that the successful rescue operation demonstrated the Federal Government’s commitment to protecting lives through carefully coordinated security operations.

He stressed that terrorism and kidnapping required intelligence-led responses rather than political rhetoric.

“The President has taken the fight against insecurity very seriously. His administration remains focused on restoring peace across the country, protecting lives and creating an environment where Nigerians can live and pursue their legitimate aspirations without fear,” Akume said.

The SGF also commended the Global Association of Christian and Muslim Youth for Peace and Development for promoting religious harmony and national unity.

Earlier, the association’s President, Bassey, said the group visited the SGF to strengthen its relationship with his office, citing Akume’s record in public service.

“We have come to familiarise and strengthen our relationship with you because we believe strongly in your leadership. We have followed your antecedents over the years, and we are convinced that you are committed to the service of our nation,” Bassey said.

Oyo APC slams Makinde

The Oyo State chapter of the All Progressives Congress, on Tuesday, condemned Makinde’s call on the UN to investigate the circumstances surrounding the killings, abductions and subsequent rescue of 44 abductees, describing it as “shameful, shocking and unbecoming of a leader.”

The APC, in a statement issued by its Publicity Secretary, Olawale Sadare, in Ibadan, described the governor’s position as “the height of ineptitude, cluelessness and grandstanding.”

The party urged the governor to be “circumspect, decorous and statesman-like in his politicking, even as he prepares to leave office in about 10 months.”

It added, “Nigeria has been battling banditry and related crimes in recent times, and this can be attributed to a number of factors. But most people are worried that Oyo has emerged as the worst-hit state in the southern part of the country since 2019, when Makinde came on board.

“Meanwhile, events in the last two months have provided answers to many questions being raised in that regard. Oyo State has a governor who plays politics with everything, including the welfare and security of the masses.

“Cluelessness is when a governor feels he would only function well as the chief security officer of his state if he were handed the power to appoint and control the Inspector-General of Police, the Chief of Army Staff and the rest of them.

“It is safe to say that it is on this premise that Governor Makinde has thrown his hat into the ring as a contestant for the presidency, but his laughable ambition cannot see the light of day because he lacks the wherewithal to lead a nation like Nigeria.

“But for dirty politicking, naivety and cluelessness, an average elite should know about Article 2(7) of the United Nations Charter, which shields sovereign states from external interference.

“And if it becomes a must for Makinde to make such a call, he should be courageous enough to submit himself to investigations over the diversion of local government funds, the abduction and brutal killings of Igangan residents, the N7.7bn surveillance aircraft deal, the firefighting truck scam, the possession of lethal weapons by Mukaila Auxiliary, the N50bn Bodija explosion relief fund, the Agbowo Shopping Complex contract, the Ibadan Airport and stadium upgrade projects, loan scandals, among others.”

The position by the Senate, SGF and Oyo APC comes a day after the Presidency faulted Makinde’s call for a UN-led investigation, describing it as unnecessary and politically motivated.

The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, had said the governor’s request suggested a lack of confidence in Nigeria’s security institutions, insisting that the military and other security agencies had already provided explanations on the rescue operation.

See also  CBN pumps $1.25bn into fuel import, others

Onanuga, however, said the Federal Government had no objection to an international body examining the incident if the governor believed there were unresolved issues.

Oyo Assembly backs Makinde

The Oyo State House of Assembly, on Tuesday, reaffirmed its support for Makinde’s call for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding the abduction of schoolchildren and their teachers in Oriire LG.

It maintained that an international probe remained necessary to establish the facts surrounding the mass abduction, strengthen Nigeria’s security architecture and help prevent similar attacks on schools across the country.

The House, in a statement from the Office of the Speaker in Ibadan, the state capital, congratulated the government and the people of the state on the successful rescue of the pupils and teachers abducted by terrorists in the local government.

It said, “Mass abduction of schoolchildren has become a disturbing pattern in Nigeria. If our collective efforts as a country have not been sufficient to end this menace, it is only appropriate to invite the relevant agency of the United Nations to investigate the unusual circumstances surrounding the Oyo State case and make recommendations that will help prevent a recurrence. Enough is enough.”

The assembly also reacted to the Senate’s resolution cautioning Makinde against seeking a UN-backed investigation, insisting that the governor’s position had been misconstrued.

According to the House, “Governor Makinde’s call should not be misinterpreted, but rather it should be seen as a patriotic appeal for greater transparency, accountability and international collaboration in addressing the growing menace of terrorism and mass school abductions.

“The governor had consistently commended President Tinubu, the Armed Forces, intelligence agencies, the Nigeria Police Force, Amotekun Corps and other security stakeholders for their coordinated efforts that culminated in the successful rescue of the victims after weeks in captivity.

“The call for an independent international investigation is neither an indictment of the Federal Government nor a criticism of our gallant security agencies.

“It is a responsible request aimed at establishing the full circumstances surrounding this unfortunate incident, identifying possible security gaps and making recommendations that will help prevent a recurrence.

“Commending the efforts of our security agencies and seeking a transparent review of the incident are not mutually exclusive.”

It further explained that terrorism and attacks on schools had assumed transnational dimensions, making international cooperation increasingly important in developing effective counter-terrorism strategies.

The House stressed that many democratic nations had subjected major security incidents to independent investigations without undermining the professionalism of their security institutions or their national sovereignty.

It stated that Makinde’s proposal was not about apportioning blame but about ensuring that every lesson from the Oriire abduction was fully understood and translated into stronger security measures capable of protecting innocent schoolchildren across Nigeria.

While commending the Senate for recognising the bravery and sacrifices of the Armed Forces, intelligence agencies and other security operatives involved in the rescue mission, the House also praised the upper chamber’s call for improved welfare, training, logistics and modern equipment for security agencies, as well as prompt payment of benefits to the families of fallen personnel.

It, however, maintained that these resolutions complemented, rather than contradicted, Makinde’s call for an international investigation, noting that both are aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s fight against terrorism and kidnapping.

The House, therefore, called on Nigerians, irrespective of political, ethnic or religious affiliations, to support every genuine initiative capable of improving national security, safeguarding schools and protecting children from future attacks.

It also commiserated with the families of the security officers and the teacher who lost their lives during the tragic incident.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Governors spend N512bn on travels, offices

Published

on

Thirty-three state governments spent at least N512.10bn on Government Houses, Governors’ Offices and travel and transport in the first six months of 2026, an amount about 4,713 times higher than the combined six-month salary of Nigeria’s 36 governors, an analysis of state budget implementation reports has shown on Monday.

The analysis showed that while a governor’s stated monthly salary of N503,000 translates to N3.018m over six months, the combined six-month salary of all 36 governors would amount to just N108.65m.

Against this, the available records showed that N420.01bn was identified under Government House, Governor’s Office and related executive administration expenditure, while another N92.09bn was spent under travel and transport budget heads.

The combined amount stood at N512.10bn. The six-month salary of all 36 governors, therefore, represented only 0.02 per cent of the identified expenditure on executive offices and travel.

The figures offers a striking contrast to the ongoing debate over the official salaries of Nigerian governors.

Delta State Governor, Sheriff Oborevwori, recently said his monthly salary was N503,000, arguing that some senior civil servants, including permanent secretaries earned N900,000 monthly, more than state governors.

But an analysis of the cost of maintaining the offices occupied by governors shows that their salaries represent only a fraction of the wider public expenditure and perks associated with the offices.

While the personal salary of a governor may appear modest compared with the salaries of some senior public servants, the analysis shows that the wider cost of maintaining the executive office runs into hundreds of billions of naira.

The figure is not the personal income of governors. Government House and Governor’s Office budget heads cover a broad range of official expenses, including administrative operations, staff, protocol, maintenance, official residences, utilities, security-related activities, state functions and other expenditure required to run the executive arm of government.

Similarly, travel and transport spending covers official local and foreign trips, transportation and related expenses across the wider state public service.

However, the figures provide an indication of the enormous public cost attached to maintaining the structures surrounding the offices of state governors and the larger fiscal question on the  total public cost of maintaining the office and the administrative structures around it.

The analysis is based on available Budget Implementation Reports for the first and second quarters of 2026, using the largest identifiable Government House, Governor’s Office or executive administration expenditure line in each state, alongside the general travel and transport expenditure head.

See also  PDP HQ showdown: Makinde, Wike factions hold rival NEC sessions today

Abia, Adamawa, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Plateau, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara had the complete data. Comparable data were unavailable for Edo, Osun and Rivers.

For comparison, available records for the first half of 2025 showed N465.07bn spent under Government House, Governor’s Office and similar executive administration heads, while N92.73bn was recorded for travel and transport. The combined figure stood at N557.80bn.

This means that, based on the states and budget heads for which comparable data were available, the first-half 2026 expenditure was about N45.70bn lower, representing a 8.19 per cent decline, compared with the corresponding period of 2025.

Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure accounted for the larger share of the spending.

The amount fell from N465.07bn in the first half of 2025 to N420.01bn in the corresponding period of 2026, representing a reduction of N45.05bn or 9.69 per cent.

Travel and transport spending, however, was largely unchanged. Available records showed that states spent N92.09bn on travel and transport in the first six months of 2026, compared with N92.73bn in the same period of 2025.

This represented a marginal decline of about N643.66m, or 0.69 per cent.

The figures suggest that while spending under Government House and executive administration heads moderated in the available records, the cost of official travel remained broadly stable.

Commenting on the development, a development economist, Aliyu Ilias, said the enormous cost associated with maintaining executive offices showed why it was misleading to focus only on a governor’s basic salary without taking into account the wider expenses and privileges attached to the office.

He argued that executive offices in Nigeria had become excessively expensive to maintain, partly because political office holders had significant influence over how the institutions under their control were structured and funded.

“Ordinarily, anything that has to do with executive office in Nigeria appears to be much more expensive because they actually direct how it works there. And with the docile state assemblies we have, who always concur, it is clear that our democracy is very expensive because of the way we maintain their offices, and that is why it is very juicy.

See also  ‘Sleeping Prince’ of Saudi Arabia dies after 20 years in coma

“Some even want to go as far as borrowing money to win an election and, when they enter office, they believe they are going to repay the money. So, it is not correct to say that a Permanent Secretary is earning better than a governor when you isolate the governor’s salary without adding the other travel perks and expenses attached to the office.

“The governor just wanted to be sensational. But with the addition you have done, it shows that they are taking the bigger cheque from the spending arising from the high income that the state is generating,” Ilias said.

A state-by-state analysis of the 2026 Government House or Governor’s Office expenditure, Kogi recorded the highest amount at N65.34bn, followed by Ogun with N45.26bn and Lagos with N45.04bn.

Kano recorded N25.87bn, while Ekiti spent N25.22bn and Cross River recorded N23.92bn.

Bayelsa recorded N22.99bn, Imo N19.43bn and Enugu N16.20bn.

At the lower end of the available records, Oyo recorded about N1.95bn, Sokoto N2.20bn, Kwara N2.59bn and Abia N2.78bn.

Kogi’s figure alone represented more than 15 per cent of the identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure captured in the 2026 dataset.

On travel and transport, Plateau recorded the highest identifiable expenditure at N10.11bn in the first six months of 2026.

Lagos followed with N8.23bn, while Taraba recorded N5.16bn.

Niger spent N4.45bn, Ekiti N4.41bn, while Bauchi recorded N3.75bn and Yobe N3.68bn.

Oyo recorded one of the lowest identifiable amounts at N667.52m, while Kano recorded N626.95m.

The figures also showed wide variations in expenditure patterns between 2025 and 2026.

For example, Kogi’s Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure increased from N51.99bn in the first half of 2025 to N65.34bn in the corresponding period of 2026. This represented an increase of about N13.34bn, or 25.66 per cent.

Bayelsa’s identifiable spending rose from N14.48bn to N22.99bn, an increase of N8.51bn, or 58.75 per cent.

Cross River’s expenditure increased from N9.91bn to N23.92bn, representing a rise of about N14.01bn, or 141.37 per cent.

Ekiti, which had no comparable 2025 figure in the dataset provided for this analysis, recorded N25.22bn in the first six months of 2026.

See also  Tinubu laying strong foundation for long-term prosperity — Minister

Other states, however, recorded significant reductions.

Ogun’s identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure declined from N49.83bn in the first half of 2025 to N45.26bn in 2026, a reduction of N4.57bn, or 9.17 per cent.

Kano’s expenditure fell from N28.84bn to N25.87bn, representing a decline of about N2.98bn, or 10.32 per cent.

Niger recorded a smaller decline from N13.13bn to N14.15bn, although the available figures show an increase of about N1.02bn, or 7.74 per cent, underscoring the differences in spending patterns across the states.

Lagos recorded one of the most significant increases in the available data, with identifiable spending rising from N25.86bn in 2025 to N45.04bn in 2026, an increase of about N19.18bn, or 74.16 per cent.

The Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission is constitutionally responsible for determining the remuneration of governors and other political office holders. The existing remuneration framework remains in force while a broader review is being processed by the relevant authorities.

In recent weeks, RMAFC said its review of remuneration for executive and legislative office holders had reached an advanced stage, with proposed legislation expected to be considered by the National Assembly.

The spending also comes at a time when state governments have received significantly higher allocations from the Federation Account following the Federal Government’s economic reforms.

An analysis of Ministry of Finance data previously showed that N47.25tn was shared through the Federation Account between 2023 and 2025 alone, accounting for more than half of the N93.13tn distributed over the nine years from 2017 to 2025.

The sharp increase in revenues has intensified public scrutiny over whether the additional resources flowing to states are being translated into better infrastructure and public services.

The records reveal a huge gap between the official salaries of governors and the actual cost of maintaining the executive structures around their offices.

While the basic pay of a governor may appear modest, it represents only a fraction of the public funds required to run Government Houses, Governors’ Offices and official travel. The broader question, therefore, is not simply how much governors earn as salaries, but how much it costs taxpayers to maintain the offices they occupy.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Despite Court Warrant, Sunday Igboho Allegedly Stops Police From Arresting Tani Olohun In Ibadan

Published

on

A disturbing incident in Ibadan has raised serious questions about the conduct of the Nigerian Police and the circumstances surrounding the alleged attempted arrest of a traditionalist,Tani Olorun, reportedly over his longstanding religious disagreements with some Islamic clerics in Kwara State.

According to accounts circulating about the incident, a Toyota Hiace bus allegedly arrived at the traditionalist’s residence in Ibadan with four men believed to be police officers. Two were reportedly dressed in police uniform while the other two were in mufti.

What immediately raised suspicion was that the vehicle allegedly had no visible number plate, while the men reportedly failed to produce police identification when requested by the resident’s wife and neighbours. As the situation attracted a crowd, concerns grew that what was being presented as an arrest could instead be an unauthorised attempt to forcibly remove the man from his residence.

The situation reportedly took an even more dramatic turn when Chief Sunday Igboho arrived at the scene and intervened, insisting that the men follow proper police procedures.

The intervention reportedly stopped the attempted removal and the men were ordered to return to their ilorin base.

But the bigger question remains:

Why would security personnel travel all the way from Kwara to Ibadan to remove a traditionalist from his home under circumstances that allegedly failed to meet basic standards of police identification and due process?

The controversy is particularly sensitive because Tani Olorun has reportedly had longstanding disputes with some Islamic clerics over religious issues. He was previously arrested in Kwara following allegations that he defamed an Islamic cleric and reportedly spent a prolonged period in detention before his release.

See also  Israel Orders Evacuation Of Gaza City Tower Ahead Of Planned Strike

His subsequent outspoken criticism of religious teachings and defence of traditional African religion have reportedly continued to generate controversy.

This is where Chief Sunday Igboho’s confrontation with the Kwara State Commissioner of Police becomes significant.

Igboho was reportedly heard questioning why the Kwara Police Command[b] appeared to have the resources and urgency to pursue a controversial religious-related arrest in Ibadan, while communities in Kwara continue to complain about kidnapping, banditry and insecurity, including attacks allegedly affecting ordinary citizens and traditional rulers.[/b]

His message was essentially this:

If the police can travel from Kwara to Ibadan to arrest a traditionalist over a religious dispute, why has the same urgency not been demonstrated in confronting the kidnappers and bandits terrorising Kwara communities?

That question deserves a serious answer.

The Nigerian Police Force must not allow legitimate law enforcement to be confused with intimidation, religious persecution or extra-judicial abduction. If an individual is wanted for an offence, the police should identify themselves properly, present the appropriate documentation and follow established legal procedures.

No Nigerian citizen should be secretly taken away from his home under questionable circumstances.

And if this was indeed a legitimate arrest, then the authorities should explain clearly what offence was alleged, what warrant or lawful authority was relied upon, why officers travelled from Kwara to Ibadan, and why the operation reportedly generated such serious concerns about its legitimacy.

Chief Sunday Igboho’s intervention has therefore brought an important issue to the public space:

Law enforcement must protect Nigerians from kidnappers—not create circumstances in which Nigerians begin to fear that the police themselves may come to take them away.

See also  Death toll rises to six in Lagos GNI fire

The allegations surrounding this incident should be thoroughly investigated, and the public deserves transparency.

Security must never become a tool for religious vendetta. Justice must never be selective. And an arrest must never look like a kidnapping.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

US plans mass visa revocation for asylum seekers — Report

Published

on

The United States government is planning to revoke the business and tourism visas of as many as 200,000 foreigners who have sought or are seeking asylum in the country, in what could become the largest mass visa revocation in US history.

The planned action targets holders of B1 and B2 visas issued between 2016 and 2026 who entered the US as short-term visitors but subsequently applied for asylum, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press and two US officials, as reported by the agency on Monday.

The State Department is expected to begin announcing the revocations in the coming weeks in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security.

State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott confirmed the planned action but said the number of affected people could change.

“We are coordinating with DHS to identify and revoke the nonimmigrant visas of foreigners who have come to the United States claiming to be short-term visitors, but then file for asylum to stay here permanently,” Pigott said.

He added that “the number of revocations remains dynamic” and that the action would be carried out “on a rolling basis.”

The revocations would not automatically lead to immediate deportation, according to the officials. People with pending asylum applications would instead lose their B1 or B2 status while their cases are considered.

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau defended the proposed policy, arguing that visitor visas should not be used as a route into the US asylum system.

“Asylum isn’t supposed to be a loophole to circumvent immigration law,” Landau said in a post on X.

See also  ‘Sleeping Prince’ of Saudi Arabia dies after 20 years in coma

B1 visas are generally issued for business travel, while B2 visas cover tourism, family visits and medical treatment. Applicants are required to demonstrate that they intend to return to their home countries.

What it could mean for Nigerians

The proposed revocation could affect Nigerians among other foreign nationals, although the US government has not disclosed how many Nigerians may be involved in the 200,000 figure.

Nigerians have historically accounted for a significant share of African asylum applications in the US. According to UNHCR figures previously reported by The PUNCH, 2,827 Nigerians applied for asylum in the US in 2024.

Between 2022 and 2024, US immigration courts granted asylum to 1,372 Nigerians, while 1,534 applications were denied.

For Nigerians currently holding B1 or B2 visas who have applied for asylum, the development could mean losing their visitor status and facing closer scrutiny of their immigration cases. It also signals a tougher environment for Nigerians seeking to use short-term US visas as a pathway to remain in the country.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending