Connect with us

Politics

Police, Abdulsalami panel move to curb rising tension in the 2027 campaigns

Published

on

The Nigeria Police Force and the National Peace Committee led by former military Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar (retd.), have stepped up efforts to contain rising political tension and alleged inciting comments as campaigns for the 2027 general elections gather momentum.

The police have commenced investigations into controversial remarks allegedly made by the Borno State Commissioner for Youth and Sports Development, Sainna Buba; the Chairman of Kuje Area Council in the Federal Capital Territory, Samuel Shekwolo; and Senator Francis Fadahunsi, representing Osun East Senatorial District.

At the same time, the Peace Committee has activated a situation room and an Electoral Offences Tracking System to monitor campaigns, alleged breaches of the political accord and other conduct capable of undermining the electoral process.

The developments followed a series of controversial statements and reported incidents that have heightened fears of intimidation and violence as political parties intensify mobilisation for the 2027 polls.

Last week, Shekwolo sparked public outrage after a viral video showed him warning residents opposed to the All Progressives Congress to leave the council ahead of the elections.

“I’ve said in my area council, it is either you are doing APC or leave the area council. I am not hiding it. I’m saying it with all confidence,” Shekwolo said.

Days after Shekwolo’s warning, thugs armed with cutlasses reportedly attacked an Accord Party political gathering in Kuje, Abuja, on Sunday. The attackers allegedly chased participants away, destroyed campaign materials and furniture, and injured at least one person.

Similarly, Fadahunsi came under criticism after another viral video showed him threatening members of the Accord Party in Ilesa, Osun State, amid heightened political tension before last month’s governorship election.

Fadahunsi, an APC member, spoke in Yoruba while addressing supporters during a protest at the palace of the Owa Obokun of Ijesaland over what he described as the incessant killing of APC members in the area.

He said, “The cap they wear – it is yellow fever cap, it is the cap of an animal.

“It is animal that kills. Have you ever heard that APC killed anyone? Are those being killed not your people? So, we have come to tell you, up till the day of the election, if we see them, it is killing.”

His comments came a day after three people were killed in a shooting in the Imo area of Ilesa, Osun State, amid heightened political tension ahead of the August 15 governorship election. The circumstances surrounding the killings, however, remained disputed.

Buba also came under fire after he reportedly threatened to flog and cut off the fingers of residents who refused to support the APC in the 2027 election.

The incidents have intensified concerns over the potential use of threats, intimidation and violence in the electoral process, prompting increased scrutiny by security and peace-building institutions.

On Tuesday, opposition parties accused the APC-led government of heightening political tension, while the ruling party challenged them to provide evidence to support the allegations.

The Tanimu Turaki (SAN)-backed Peoples Democratic Party National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, told The PUNCH in an exclusive interview that the APC was aware that a free, fair and credible election could produce an outcome undesirable to the ruling party.

He alleged that threats were being issued to intimidate voters and discourage them from exercising their franchise.

The National Democratic Congress National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, also accused President Bola Tinubu of actions and utterances capable of heightening political tension, insisting that Nigerians could not be cowed by threats or intimidation.

Similarly, the National Chairman of the Action Democratic Party, Yabagi Sani, warned the APC and other political actors against actions that could create confusion, disorder or anarchy during the election period.

However, the APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, dismissed allegations that the ruling party was desperate or recruiting people to cause mayhem.

He challenged the accusers to provide evidence, arguing that the APC had no reason to create chaos while in power and seeking to retain it through the delivery of democratic dividends to Nigerians.

Opposition blames APC

Reacting, the PDP accused the APC of fearing a free, fair and credible election and alleged that the threats were aimed at intimidating voters and discouraging turnout.

Ememobong said the incidents formed part of a wider strategy and reflected what he described as an early sign of failure by the ruling party.

He stated, “The attacks and threats are clear indication of the rejection that they are already aware of. A free, fair and credible election will produce a result that will be undesirable to them, which is why they are now trying to force the people to do what they know is against the tide.

“The current tide is against them, and so they know that they are swimming against the tide, which is why they are issuing threats well in advance and undertaking activities that will either scare people from coming to vote or will force people to vote against the tide of the moment.

“And so, it is a clear sign of an early failure, and that is why you see that it is a strategy. It is not isolated cases. These are things that are happening everywhere at the same time, with the same intensity, and all of them have the same underlying issue: the threats that are being issued by these people. So, it is clear that they know that the election is theirs to lose.

See also  Labour Party in Nasarawa elects new chairman

“Well, that is why we are coming together to expand the platform under which everybody who is opposed to the system can exercise their franchise. So, in that way, we are going to have a lot of joint activities where we are not just doing PDP, doing ADC, doing NDC, but we are all together opposing a common enemy.”

The NDC National Publicity Secretary said democracy was under siege in Nigeria, condemning the alleged use of violence and undemocratic tactics to intimidate and silence opposition parties ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Director called on security agencies and the international community to protect the democratic process, urging Nigerians to participate fully in the election and freely exercise their right to vote.

He stated, “The NDC is concern with the manifestation of violence. Obviously, democracy is under siege in Nigeria, and this is clear from the statement of the President who said that in politics, all is fair. All is fair in politics, so it means violence, using undemocratic means to intimidate and cow the opposition, is fair. So, by that statement, they threaten members of his party or intimidate them and take possible members of the opposition in a bid to realise their nefarious and burgeoning ambition of winning the 2027 general election. It is so unfortunate.

“We are calling on the Nigerian security agencies to please take the responsibility to ensure that this is addressed. We are calling on the international community and society to help sustain democracy in Nigeria and ensure that these negative manifestations of anti-democratic forces are terminated and put under control.

“The voters in Nigeria and the electorate in general should not be intimidated. They must be citizens of Nigeria. It is not just enough to call yourself a citizen; you must be a civilised citizen, and that is part of your right to vote. So, we must vote and participate in the process to change any government that we don’t want.

“These people are a minority. Nigerians and the Nigerian masses are larger than them, and they should be committed to ensuring a free and fair election. They should participate in the forthcoming election by casting their votes without fear or intimidation.”

On its part, ADP National Chairman, Yabagi Sani, cautioned that while the government had the power of incumbency, the opposition could also react negatively to actions it considered threatening to the electoral process.

He stated, “Well, you know, every national election, not only in Nigeria, comes with some level of anxiety over issues such as the safety of lives and property, rigging, intimidation, and the high-handedness that can sometimes come with the power of incumbency. So, people naturally get worked up when such an important exercise is approaching.

“But the cases you mentioned, such as the alleged maltreatment of people at the mission somewhere in the North, and also here, I don’t know whether they are isolated cases. If they are not, and they are connected to the upcoming election, then it is unfortunate because that will not go well for anyone.

“If the government has the power of incumbency and can do and undo, it should also remember that the opposition has the power to, I wouldn’t say cause destruction, but to react negatively. So, they must be wary of that. People should not, on account of elections, begin to create problems that could affect lives and property.”

APC reacts

In response, the All Progressives Congress dismissed allegations that it was recruiting people to cause mayhem, insisting that the claims were unsupported by evidence.

APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, also questioned the identities of those making the allegations, accusing some individuals of posing as party members to damage the APC’s image and credibility.

He stated, “Any allegation that does not come with evidence remains an allegation, and it will be treated as an allegation until that proof is provided. The evidence that we are desperate is not there. The evidence that we are recruiting people to cause mayhem is not there. Why should we, when we are in control? Why should we, when we are enjoying support and increasing support on a daily basis, create confusion or chaos in the system that will lead to disorder or anarchy, when we are the ones in power and we want to continue being in power so that we will keep giving democratic dividends to the people?

“You see, sometimes I question the evidence, the proof, and the authority to authenticate the identity of the person making the allegations.

“One, some people make allegations in disguise when they are truly not real, genuine members of our party. Some people will disguise themselves; they will wear the robe of the party in power and make allegations with a view to robbing or bringing down the image or name of the party.

“But when you conduct a genuine investigation, you will find that they are not genuine members of the party until the identities of those people are really brought out and they are seen to be card-carrying members of our party.

“I don’t want to believe in what is being said. Why? There is just no logic. It beats common sense that a party in power will want to create anarchy. When there is anarchy, it means there will be no law and order. When there is no law and order, automatically, it means you lose control of the power you are enjoying.”

See also  Natasha resumes at Senate, calls Akpabio dictator

Peace committee action

Meanwhile, the National Peace Committee has commenced monitoring alleged violations of the political accord among parties, while the police have begun investigating reported incidents linked to the agreement.

Head of Secretariat, National Peace Committee, Fr. Atta Barkindo, said the committee had established a situation room and an Electoral Offences Tracking System to monitor breaches of the Peace Accord, electoral laws and other regulatory frameworks.

“We have a situation room, and we have what we call the Electoral Offences Tracking System that we use to monitor not just violations of the Accord, but also violations of the electoral law and electoral frameworks.

“We are monitoring that, whether it’s by parties, candidates, party members, party supporters, party stakeholders, party spokespersons, etc. We are documenting both the violent and the non-violent aspects,” he said.

Barkindo added that the committee had documented utterances made by presidential candidates at the recently concluded Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association, which would be forwarded to the Independent National Electoral Commission and the police for appropriate action.

“We are handing over to the police and INEC. The Peace Committee does not have the constitutional authority to prosecute or to sanction. So, the police and INEC were witnesses. They signed onto the accord,” he said.

He said the committee was also advocating the establishment of an Electoral Offences Commission by the National Assembly.

“So, we are sharing that information with them, and we are doing two things. We expect that they will take action, number one, and number two, we are pushing with the National Assembly to set up the Electoral Offences Commission,” Barkindo stated.

He urged the media to support efforts to promote issue-based campaigns, citing debates on fuel subsidy removal and the reopening of Nigeria’s borders as examples of issues that should dominate political discourse.

A top INEC official, who spoke with our correspondent on condition of anonymity, said the commission could not comment on the allegations because they were security matters.

The official, however, said political parties and other stakeholders were expected to comply with campaign rules and guidelines.

“INEC cannot comment on it. Those are security matters. Campaigns have started, and there are rules guiding those campaigns, so INEC expects compliance.

“Comments made by political actors fall within the ambit and purview of security agencies, so I can’t comment on that. But INEC expects political parties and stakeholders to abide by the rules,” the official said.

Police probe violence

In a related development, the Nigeria Police Force, confirmed that aside from investigating the comments of Fadahunsi, Shekwolo and Buba, the 154 persons arrested during the August 15 Osun State governorship election were also under investigation.

Addressing journalists at a joint security spokespersons’ briefing on Tuesday in Abuja, the Force spokesman, Ani Iniedu, said inciting comments, particularly those relating to the electoral process, constituted a criminal offence.

The police said the investigation formed part of efforts to address issues arising from the conduct of the Osun election and recent controversial statements by political actors.

Iniedu said the police had questioned Fadahunsi over his alleged threat against members of the Accord Party.

He said, “On the issue of the Senator in Osun State, the Council Chairman in FCT and the Borno Commissioner’s inciting comments. I was part of the team that questioned the distinguished Senator in Osun State. The law is very clear when it comes to inciting. It is criminal to incite members of the public, especially as you comment on the electoral process.

“The Nigerian Police Force is responsible for maintaining law and order and we will not shy away from this responsibility, no matter whose ox is gored.”

The Force said all the alleged inciting statements were under investigation and that the outcomes would be made public.

“Every inciting statement listed here is under investigation presently and the outcome will be released. We want to also use this opportunity to advise and caution all political stakeholders to desist from such comments,” he added.

On the Osun election, Iniedu confirmed that 154 suspects arrested as of the morning of the poll remained under investigation.

“However, I want to confirm that through the elections, as of the morning of the elections, we had arrested about 154 persons and they are presently being investigated,” the police spokesperson said.

The Force also appealed to members of the public to cooperate with investigators by providing statements and evidence needed to prosecute suspected offenders.

Iniedu identified the reluctance of witnesses to come forward as a major challenge to criminal prosecution, noting that allegations must be supported by evidence.

“One of the challenges I must tell you now that we have, the law states that a case is made when there are two or three witnesses. He who alleges must prove his allegations,” he said.

“The challenge we have in Nigeria right now is that most of our witnesses are those who have evidence to incident, do not come forward when it is time to go to court.”

He urged members of the public to provide information and evidence without fear, saying their cooperation would assist investigators and prosecutors in securing convictions.

See also  APC ramps up membership e-registration in states

He said, “I would refer to you, enlightened members of the public, to come forward without fear and to give your representation so we could help our lawyers in prosecution of these cases.”

‘Shun hate speech’

Also, the Savannah Centre for Diplomacy, Democracy and Development’s Council of the Wise, chaired by former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, urged presidential candidates contesting the 2027 general elections to shun hate speech, inflammatory remarks and violence during their campaigns.

The council made the call on Tuesday evening in Abuja during an advocacy engagement with the Peoples Redemption Party presidential candidate and former Cross River State Governor, Donald Duke.

The Ariwoola-led council also urged presidential candidates and their supporters to comply with electoral laws and guidelines, stressing the need for issue-based campaigns focused on addressing the challenges confronting Nigerians.

Ariwoola said elections in Nigeria since 1999 had been marred by violence, hate speech, rigging, vote-buying and other malpractices.

The former CJN stated, “The 2007 general elections through which the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua was elected President was generally regarded as flawed, which he publicly admitted. As a concerned leader, he set up an Electoral Reform Committee headed by a former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Muhammed Uwais. Sadly, death took him (Yar’Adua) in 2010 before the implementation of the committee’s report, of which 90 per cent of its recommendations were accepted by the government but not implemented.

“Recall the unpleasant experience of many killings and destruction that followed the 2011 general election which recorded the highest casualty when over 1,000 lives were lost in that mayhem, especially in the Northern States.

“Failure to implement most of the recommendations of the reform committee, the triggers and drivers of election-related violence continued to pose serious threats to subsequent general elections. As the 2015 general elections approached, the situation became more alarming, thus requiring more intervention to prevent the repeat of the nasty experience of 2011. Your Excellency, as a two-term Civilian Governor of Cross River State during this period, you are a living witness to the bitter experiences I summarised now.”

Addressing Duke, Ariwoola urged him to set an example of responsible political conduct and ensure that his campaign was free of hate speech and inflammatory rhetoric.

He said, “The Council wishes to congratulate you on your emergence as the party’s candidate for the 2027 presidential elections. The Council’s main advice to you as the presidential candidate under the Peoples Redemption Party is to request you to always listen to your own wise counsel during the campaigns in order to have successful elections.

“It is also important to emphasise that as a presidential candidate, you should ensure that the political campaigns are devoid of rancour, hate speech, inflammatory and unguided utterances capable of instigating violence. Nigeria deserves peaceful, transparent 2027 elections.

“Let me also remind you that it is imperative to always abide by the party’s Code of Conduct and Constitution, so that you earn the trust and respect of the electorate who will vote for you. It is also important to remind you that as a responsible Nigerian who aspires to secure the mandate to lead the country as a whole, exemplary conduct and inspiring attitude is expected from you at all times.

“In this regard, it will greatly deepen democracy and democratic practice if you lead in compelling members of your party and supporters to fully comply with the electoral laws and guidelines issued by the electoral umpire, in order to develop a culture of integrity and trust.”

Responding, Duke assured the Council of the Wise that he and the PRP would conduct themselves lawfully ahead of the 2027 elections and would not resort to violence or confrontation, even when faced with challenges.

Duke said Nigeria’s democracy had become a “do-or-die affair” because politics was increasingly treated as an occupation rather than a vocation.

“Unfortunately, the way we practise democracy in Nigeria is devoid of that, and there are several reasons for this. Before I go into all that, let me give you my assurance, and that of my party, that we will conduct ourselves in a law-abiding manner. Even when things are going wrong for us, we will not resort to violence or confrontation. There is a due course of action to be taken, and we will align with that,” the former Cross River governor said.

He added, “But the fundamentals of our democracy are being lost on us because, as you mentioned in passing, it has become literally a do-or-die affair. That is because we have turned politics into an occupation rather than a vocation.

“Politics ought to be seen as a vocation in which people express their views on how society should be run, which is a noble thing. Indeed, I tell people that the noblest vocation is politics because it really runs every other aspect of society. Whether you are a doctor, a lawyer or whatever profession, you are influenced by the politics of the society. Politicians make the rules and regulations that govern society.”

The PRP presidential candidate attributed the growing attraction to politics to unemployment, economic hardship and other social challenges, which he said had encouraged many Nigerians to view politics as an occupation rather than public service.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Traditional rulers face neutrality test as politicians storm palaces ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

As political interests increasingly seek the influence of traditional institutions, Nigeria’s royal fathers face a delicate battle to preserve their neutrality, authority and place above partisan divisions, writes CHIMA AZUBUIKE

When the Emir of Gombe, Abubakar-Shehu Abubakar III, declared that traditional rulers belonged to no political party and would not allow personal considerations to divide the communities entrusted to their care, his message resonated beyond the confines of his palace. Abubakar echoed this imperative when the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof Joash Amupitan, visited him in his palace last Monday. The visit touched on one of the most delicate questions in Nigeria’s political landscape: whether traditional institutions can remain impartial despite the fact that their positions, privileges and continued relevance are often tied to the political establishment. It was also a timely reminder of the responsibility traditional rulers bear as custodians of community values, mediators in local disputes and influential voices in grassroots political engagement. The visits of political office holders, political office seekers to palaces is bound to increase ahead of the 2027 elections.

Amupitan’s visit was part of INEC’s North-East zonal interactive meeting with electoral officials and stakeholders ahead of the 2027 general election. Beyond seeking royal blessings and prayers, the engagement offered an opportunity to reflect on the influence traditional rulers wield over their subjects and the extent to which that influence can contribute to credible elections.

The emir’s position was unambiguous: traditional rulers must serve everyone, regardless of political affiliation, religious beliefs or social background. He said, “As royal rulers, we recognise that free and peaceful elections are essential to the stability, unity and progress of our country.

“Our task is to ensure that we are in a unique position in this regard. Royal fathers serve all our subjects irrespective of their political affiliation, religious beliefs or social backgrounds.

“We belong to no political party, and we have never allowed our personal considerations to divide the community entrusted to our care. This is a responsibility we take very seriously.”

It was a statement of principle, but one that also raises the question: How can traditional rulers remain politically neutral when the political system within which they operate sometimes rewards loyalty and punishes perceived disloyalty?

Across Nigeria, traditional rulers occupy a complicated position. They are expected to be above partisan politics, yet they operate in an environment where political actors frequently seek their endorsement, blessings and influence. Their palaces are important stops for politicians seeking legitimacy, while their public appearances can be interpreted as signals of political preference.

For many politicians, a royal reception is more than a courtesy call. It is an opportunity to demonstrate acceptance by the community, mobilise grassroots support and communicate political strength to rivals.

Conversely, an absent monarch, a closed palace gate or a reception organised away from the traditional seat of authority can become a political statement in itself.

The emir’s declaration invites a deeper examination of whether traditional rulers can successfully separate their public responsibilities from the political calculations that increasingly shape their relationships with elected officials.

Traditional rulers have long occupied an important place in Nigeria’s community life. Their influence extends beyond ceremonial functions to conflict resolution, cultural preservation, mobilisation for development and mediation between governments and citizens.

In many rural communities, they remain among the most accessible authorities. Their words carry weight because of longstanding cultural relationships, inherited institutions and their familiarity with local grievances. That proximity to the people makes them valuable partners in electoral administration.

While INEC is responsible for organising elections, it cannot independently resolve issues of voter apathy, community tensions, misinformation and resistance to electoral participation. Traditional rulers can easily help bridge that gap. They can explain the importance of voter registration, encourage eligible citizens to collect their Permanent Voter Cards, discourage political violence and urge residents to resolve disagreements through lawful democratic processes. They can also challenge attempts by political actors to exploit ethnic, religious or communal divisions for electoral advantage.

See also  Peter Obi reveals why he cannot step down for Atiku, read details

But the same influence that makes traditional rulers valuable to electoral administration can become problematic when deployed in the service of partisan interests.

Recollections by some Nigerians suggest that the relationship between traditional institutions and political competition has not always matched the ideal of neutrality expressed by the Emir of Gombe.

Samaila Dati, a Gombe resident, recalled an incident in which an emir allegedly shut his palace gates because he feared receiving a governor who was then seeking election.

According to Dati, the experience illustrated the difficulties politicians can encounter when traditional rulers are caught between their responsibility to serve the entire community and their relationship with the incumbent political leadership.

“Today’s Gombe governor tasted that bitter pill during his campaign to one of the emirates in the north. The emir failed to turn up despite being informed about the engagement. It took party loyalists who are members of the emirate to organise a reception in another location to welcome the current governor, who was then a candidate,” he added.

The account, as recalled by Dati, illustrates how a palace can become an arena for political calculations even when the traditional ruler’s public responsibility is to maintain open channels of communication with all political actors.

For a candidate seeking office, access to a traditional ruler can be an opportunity to present campaign promises, discuss community needs and demonstrate respect for local institutions. When that access is denied because of political considerations, the encounter risks sending a message that the community is closed to a particular political interest.

The consequences can extend beyond the immediate political contest. Where residents perceive that a traditional ruler favours one political camp, those who support opposing parties may begin to question whether the palace remains an impartial institution.

Such perceptions can weaken the palace’s ability to mediate disputes after elections, especially when political disagreements spill into family relationships, community associations and local development initiatives.

Dati’s recollection offers a perspective on the political pressures facing traditional rulers, but the circumstances surrounding the incident would require independent verification and a response from the emir concerned.

Dati’s account raises the question: should access to traditional institutions depend on a politician’s relationship with the government of the day, or should every credible political actor be treated with the same measure of courtesy?

For those who believe that traditional rulers must remain impartial, the answer should be straightforward.

Danladi Adamu, a teacher, said that tensions could emerge in the relationship between political officeholders and traditional institutions when monarchs are perceived to be close to politicians opposed to the sitting governor.

Adamu referred to the political disagreements between Governor Muhammadu Yahaya and his predecessor, Governor Danjuma Goje, during which, according to him, some traditional rulers came under pressure.

He said, “Recall Governor Inuwa Yahaya’s political tussle with his former boss, Governor Danjuma Goje. Some emirs were nearly affected, including the Emirs of Gona in Akko Local Government Area and Deba in Yamaltu-Deba LGA, but thank God for how they were resolved.”

The accounts point to the vulnerability of traditional institutions when political disagreements between powerful individuals extend into the structures of customary authority.

Adamu’s recollection does not, on its own, establish the full circumstances of the tensions he described. But it reflects a concern that deserves serious attention: the extent to which political rivalries can expose traditional rulers to pressure and threaten their ability to serve communities impartially.

For Mohammed Ahmed, a civil servant, the problem runs deeper than individual incidents involving palace visits. He believes the process through which traditional rulers are selected, nominated or recognised can influence their willingness to challenge political authorities. Ahmed invoked a popular maxim to explain his position. “He who pays the piper determines the tune,” he said. He argued that traditional rulers would struggle to remain neutral while depending on politicians for their selection and continued security in office.

“Until traditional rulers stop depending on politicians for their selection and nomination, they cannot be neutral; they can’t see something bad and say it. They will continue to be underdogs, busy watching the body language of the governors and chairmen. They will continue to be partisan,” Ahmed added. His argument raises a structural question about the relationship between traditional institutions and democratic governance.

See also  Falana, Adams predict one-candidate presidential poll in 2027

In Nigeria, traditional institutions are not uniform. Their succession arrangements differ according to local customs, historical practices and the legal frameworks governing chieftaincy matters in individual states.

In some communities, succession involves kingmakers or other customary authorities. State governments may also have formal roles in recognition, approval or the administration of chieftaincy affairs, depending on the applicable law.

Ahmed’s argument is that such dependence can turn traditional rulers into observers of political signals rather than independent voices of community interest.

The visit by Amupitan to the Gombe Emir’s Palace, therefore, carried significance beyond its ceremonial setting. The INEC chairman said the commission was consulting traditional rulers across the country to seek their blessings, prayers and support ahead of the 2027 general elections.

He explained that the North-East was the fourth geopolitical zone visited by the commission as part of its readiness assessment, following similar engagements in the South-West, North-West and South-East.

“We have visited other zones. We started with the South-West. From there, we moved to the North-West, and then to the South-East. Today, we are in the North-East,” he said.

Amupitan acknowledged the importance of traditional rulers in electoral administration, particularly in mobilising voters and promoting peaceful participation.

“Your role cannot be underestimated, most especially in ensuring the success of the 2027 general election. I am delighted to lead my team here today to seek your blessings, prayers and support,” he told the emir.

The chairman said the North-East had approximately 19.96 million registered voters, representing 13.51 per cent of Nigeria’s total registered voters.

The figures underline the region’s significance in the national electoral process and the need to ensure that eligible citizens are able to participate without intimidation, misinformation or avoidable administrative obstacles.

Amupitan appealed to the emir to mobilise eligible voters to collect their Permanent Voter Cards, emphasising that the cards were necessary for exercising their voting rights.

“Collection of PVCs is currently ongoing. It is not a favour anybody is doing the electorate to come out and vote, but you cannot vote without your PVC. We want your Royal Highness to help INEC mobilise the electorate to go out and collect their PVCs so that they can exercise their voting rights,” he said.

He urged the emir to appeal to political leaders to conduct their campaigns peacefully and discourage actions capable of undermining the electoral process.

The INEC chairman also sought the support of traditional rulers in tackling misinformation and disinformation, warning that false reports circulated on social media could cause panic, discourage voter participation and incite violence.

“People will start posting fake news, claiming that there is fighting or killing when it is not true, most of the time. We are appealing to your Royal Highness to help educate our people so that they will not be carried away by fake news and can verify information before it causes panic,” he said.

Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to impartiality, assuring Nigerians that INEC would work towards delivering free, fair, inclusive and credible elections.

“INEC is committed, I can assure you, sir, and the good people of Gombe State that under my watch, INEC will remain absolutely impartial. We have no candidate of our own, but we will do everything possible to conduct a free, fair, inclusive and credible election come 2027,” he said.

The parallel between INEC’s commitment and the emir’s declaration is significant. Both institutions must demonstrate impartiality not merely through public statements but through decisions that citizens can observe and evaluate.

For INEC, that means applying electoral rules consistently, providing accurate information and ensuring that eligible voters can participate in accordance with the law.

For traditional rulers, it means opening channels of communication to competing political interests, discouraging violence regardless of who is responsible and resisting pressure to turn customary authority into an instrument of electoral advantage.

See also  Cameroon President Biya appoints his son as vice president, hands him military command

The INEC chairman’s appeal for traditional rulers to combat misinformation is especially relevant. False reports can inflame communal tensions, undermine confidence in electoral procedures and create confusion about where and when citizens can vote.

Traditional rulers can help counter such narratives by communicating verified information through community meetings, religious and cultural gatherings, local networks and other trusted channels.

The Emir of Gombe’s declaration provides a standard against which the conduct of traditional institutions can be assessed as Nigeria approaches another general election.

But it is not enough for a monarch to announce that he belongs to no political party. It must be reflected in how the palace treats competing political actors and how the ruler responds when political interests threaten to divide the community.

A traditional ruler need not pretend to have no personal political opinions. Like other citizens, he may have views about public affairs. The more important distinction is between personal preference and the exercise of public authority.

The responsibility of the office requires that personal sympathies should not determine access to the palace, the distribution of communal attention or the willingness to mediate disputes involving competing political interests.

As the 2027 elections approach, Nigeria’s traditional institutions face an important opportunity to reaffirm their relevance in a changing political environment. Their influence will be most valuable when it is used to strengthen peaceful coexistence, protect civic participation and preserve channels of communication across political divisions.

The challenge is particularly acute in communities where access to public authorities is often mediated through traditional leaders. If a palace closes its doors to political opponents, it risks narrowing the space for democratic engagement. If it welcomes competing interests fairly, it can demonstrate that political disagreement does not have to become social hostility.

The experiences recalled by Dati, Adamu and Ahmed suggest that the question of royal neutrality cannot be resolved through appeals for good conduct alone. It also requires attention to the institutional arrangements and political relationships that may discourage traditional rulers from acting independently.

Governments must respect the distinction between their constitutional responsibilities and the customary authority exercised by traditional institutions. Political parties must recognise that a monarch’s willingness to receive an opponent is not an act of hostility. Traditional rulers, for their part, must resist the temptation to trade impartiality for political favour.

Communities also have a role to play by demanding fairness, encouraging accountability and rejecting attempts to portray political access as a privilege reserved for supporters of those in power.

Ultimately, the credibility of a traditional institution is measured not by the number of politicians who visit its palace but by the confidence people across political divides place in its ability to serve them fairly.

The Emir of Gombe’s declaration that traditional rulers belong to no political party offers a starting point. The more difficult task is ensuring that the principle survives the pressures of electoral competition.

For Nigeria’s democracy to benefit fully from the influence of traditional institutions, the palace must remain a place where political differences can be acknowledged without becoming grounds for exclusion.

The true test of neutrality, therefore, is not whether traditional rulers can avoid wearing party colours. It is whether they can protect the dignity and rights of people who wear different political colours.

As the countdown to 2027 continues, Nigeria needs traditional institutions that can stand above partisan rivalries without standing apart from the concerns of their communities.

The palace should not be a campaign office, an extension of a governor’s political structure or a refuge for one faction against another. It should remain a meeting point for the community in all its diversity. Only then will the declaration that traditional rulers belong to no political party become more than a believable statement.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Makinde’s commissioner, two aides resign, read why

Published

on

Three key appointees of the Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, officially resigned from the state cabinet on Monday.

They were the Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planning, Ayobami Ojo; Special Adviser on Budget and Economic Planning, Adegbola Oyeleke; and a member of the state Independent Electoral Commission, Sunday Falana.

Ojo, who hails from Ago-Are in Atisbo Local Government Area of the state, communicated his resignation in a letter addressed to the governor through the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Musibau Babatunde.

The PUNCH reports that in October, the governor’s Chief of Staff, Segun Ogunwuyi, resigned after more than five years in office.

His resignation was followed by that of the former Director-General of the state’s Due Process Office, Tara Adefope.

Ogunwuyi, a former member of the House of Representatives, did not publicly disclose his reason for resigning.

Following his departure, Makinde appointed Akinwole Akinwole as his replacement, while Aderonke Adedayo was appointed Director-General of the Due Process Office.

However, Ojo, on Monday, referenced his appointment letter dated June 22, 2026, and said his resignation takes immediate effect.

Ojo, who did not disclose his reason for leaving the state Executive Council, expressed appreciation to Makinde for the confidence reposed in him and the opportunity to serve the state.

Also, a former two-term member of the state House of Assembly and former council chairman, Oyeleke, announced his resignation as Special Adviser on Budget and Economic Planning.

Oyeleke, in his letter dated November 2, 2026, and addressed directly to Makinde, said he was no longer comfortable with the working environment in the administration.

See also  Cameroon President Biya appoints his son as vice president, hands him military command

He added that the circumstances had made it difficult for him to effectively pursue and fulfil the aspirations of his people while serving in the government.

Oyeleke, however, appreciated the governor for his leadership, encouragement, support, as well as the opportunity to contribute to the administration’s policies and development programmes.

He wrote, “I sincerely appreciate Your Excellency’s leadership, encouragement, support and the invaluable experience I have gained during my period of service. I remain grateful for the opportunity to have been part of this administration and to have contributed to its laudable achievements.”

The third official, Falana, who hails from Ogbomoso, also resigned his appointment as a member of OYSIEC.

In a letter dated November 2 and addressed to the governor through the Chief of Staff, Falana announced that his resignation would take immediate effect.

He did not disclose the reason for his decision but thanked Makinde for the opportunity to serve on the state’s electoral management body, describing his experience as “worthwhile.”

When The PUNCH contacted the Director-General, Media and Publicity, Bimbo Adekanmbi Campaign Council, Yinka Oladoyinbo, in Ibadan, the state capital, on Monday, he said, “The resignation will not affect the chances of our candidate (APM) in the next election. This election is not about politicians alone; it’s about the people of Oyo.

“It’s about 7.9 million people of Oyo, and they are the ones that going to decide who become the governor.

“As people are moving out of Allied People’s Movement, we also have people that are moving into APM. Like my principal said this afternoon, this is the moment we call the transfer market in politics; it’s in football. Some people would come, some people would go.

See also  Ramadan: Adamawa gov relaxes night-time restriction on tricycles

“But the ultimate power resides with the people. It is the people in the majority who will decide who becomes the governor of Oyo State, and we have the majority on our side.

“So, definitely, politicians moving or resigning will not affect our party’s chances negatively in the next general elections,” Oladoyinbo insisted.

Meanwhile, the latest departures add to the growing list of officials who have left the Makinde administration in recent months.

Other notable officials who had left their positions include former Commissioner of Police and Special Adviser on Security, Fatai Owoseni; former member of the state Advisory Council, Babatunde Oduyoye; and former Senior Special Assistant on Diaspora Matters, Funmi Arulogun.

Also included were the former Chairman of the Governing Board of the College of Agriculture, Igboora, Damilare Gideon Amusan, and former lawmaker, Peter Oyetunji.

Four other appointees — Joshua Olusola Afolabi, Rebecca Oladoja Agbejimi, Noah Adeyanju and Suleiman Adegbola — also resigned their appointments on October 19.

In a related development, the Executive Chairman of Ogbomoso North Local Government, Jimoh Idowu, resigned his membership of the APM.

Idowu announced his decision in a letter addressed to the party’s executives in the local government on Monday, expressing “appreciation for the opportunity to serve and his contributions to grassroots mobilisation and party unity.”

He also promised to hand over party documents, assets and records to the appropriate authorities.

The development comes as the state Independent Electoral Commission prepares for the December 29, 2026 local government elections across the 33 LGAs.

See also  Natasha resumes at Senate, calls Akpabio dictator

The commission released its final list of candidates on October 27.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Natasha begins re-election campaign in Kogi ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on Sunday commenced her re-election campaign across Kogi Central ahead of the February 6, 2027 senatorial election, with her supporters and Peoples Democratic Party candidates joining the campaign engagements.

The campaign featured roadside receptions across communities in Okene and other parts of the district, culminating in a gathering at the senator’s residence in Obeiba, Ihima, Okehi Local Government Area.

Her media aide, Mike Idoko, disclosed this in a statement issued in Abuja on Monday.

The campaign activities attracted party members, community leaders, political stakeholders and supporters, while PDP candidates contesting National Assembly and Kogi State House of Assembly seats in the district also participated.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, accompanied by her husband, Emmanuel Uduaghan, and other political associates, used the engagements to reaffirm her commitment to quality representation, constituency development, and legislative advocacy.

She said her relationship with the people of Kogi Central went beyond elections, adding that their support remained a source of motivation for her public service.

“My relationship with the people of Kogi Central goes beyond elections. These are my people, my family and the very reason I remain committed to public service. I do not need an election season to remember where I come from or who entrusted me with the responsibility of representing them.

“What we witnessed today is a reflection of the bond we have continued to build over time. I am deeply grateful to everyone who came out, not because they were compelled to do so, but because they believe in the journey we have undertaken together. Their love and confidence mean a great deal to me, and I will never take them for granted,” she said.

See also  Labour Party in Nasarawa elects new chairman

The senator also pledged to intensify efforts to attract infrastructure, economic opportunities and other development projects to the district, particularly the Ajaokuta area, whose development concerns she said required sustained attention.

She stressed that effective representation should go beyond occupying public office to include regular engagement with constituents, responsiveness to their needs and purposeful legislative interventions.

Among those who participated in the campaign were PDP candidates for the House of Representatives seats representing Adavi/Okehi, Ajaokuta and Okene/Ogori-Magongo Federal Constituencies, as well as the party’s candidates for the various Kogi State House of Assembly constituencies in Kogi Central.

Their participation provided an opportunity for party members and candidates to strengthen their cooperation ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The statement said thousands of supporters gathered at the senator’s Ihima residence, with many remaining there late into the night.

Kogi Central comprises five local government areas: Adavi, Ajaokuta, Okehi, Okene and Ogori-Magongo.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending