Connect with us

Politics

Missing names, party disputes cloud INEC list ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

Political parties and their candidates have begun moves to resolve discrepancies in the Independent National Electoral Commission’s final list of candidates for the 2027 general elections, following the omission of several governorship and other candidates across the country.

The development has triggered protests and anxiety among affected parties, with the Peoples Democratic Party, Nigeria Democratic Congress, African Democratic Congress and other political platforms engaging the electoral commission over the missing names.

While some parties suspect administrative or technical errors, others are grappling with internal leadership disputes, nomination controversies and pending court cases, with the Action Alliance threatening legal action to secure the inclusion of its affected candidates.

Among the prominent politicians omitted from the list are former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Prof Isa Pantami, the PDP governorship candidate in Gombe State, and the party’s Ogun State contestant, Oladipupo Adebutu.

Other affected candidates include Aminu Gwarzo of the NDC in Kano State, former senator Danjuma Tella La’ah in Kaduna State and the Social Democratic Party’s governorship candidate in Benue State, Prof Sebastine Hon (SAN).

Pantami, Adebutu and other affected candidates have urged their supporters to remain calm, expressing hope that the discrepancies can be resolved through engagement with INEC and the appropriate legal channels. The PDP said it was already holding discussions with the commission, while other parties insisted that they had complied with the relevant nomination guidelines and submission deadlines.

However, not all omissions have been attributed to administrative errors. In Kwara State, the African Action Congress governorship candidate, Duwatsu Musa, was excluded because he had yet to attain the constitutionally prescribed minimum age of 35 for governorship candidates.

In Jigawa, the ADC protested the omission of its endorsed deputy governorship candidate, Aminu Ringim, and about seven other candidates from the published list.

The controversy has raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the omissions, the eligibility of affected candidates and the remedies available to political parties ahead of the elections. As the parties seek clarification and possible corrections, the unresolved cases threaten to trigger further legal disputes over who will appear on the ballot in 2027.

INEC’s final list, signed by the commission’s Secretary, Rose Oriaran-Anthony, contains the names of candidates and their running mates cleared to contest the 2027 general elections. However, the omission of candidates nominated by some political parties has raised concerns about their participation in the polls and the options available to secure their inclusion.

The Peoples Democratic Party said it had begun engaging INEC to resolve the omission of its governorship candidates in Ogun and Gombe states, assuring affected candidates and supporters that it was treating the matter with the seriousness it deserved.

In a statement on Sunday, the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Jungudo Mohammed, said the PDP was pursuing an amicable resolution in line with the law and established electoral guidelines.

The party urged affected candidates, members and supporters to remain calm while discussions with the commission continued.

The statement read in part, “The party wishes to assure all affected candidates, members and supporters that it is already engaging with INEC to address the issues responsible for the omissions, with a view to securing an amicable resolution in accordance with the law and established electoral guidelines.

“The PDP, therefore, assures all concerned that it is treating this development with the utmost seriousness it deserves and will communicate further developments as appropriate.

“The party is committed to ensuring that all legitimate concerns are properly addressed with the commission.

“Consequently, the party calls on all affected candidates, members and supporters to remain calm, exercise patience and refrain from actions or statements capable of undermining the ongoing engagements with the commission.”

INEC’s final lists for Ogun and Gombe states contained 13 and 16 governorship candidates, respectively, but neither included a PDP candidate.

The omissions affected the party’s governorship flagbearers in the two states, Oladipupo Adebutu in Ogun and former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Prof Isa Pantami, in Gombe.

Adebutu, in a statement on Sunday, maintained that he remained a duly registered PDP member and had fulfilled the requirements for his candidacy. He said he completed his digital membership registration within the stipulated period and that his membership card had been printed and verified before the relevant documents were submitted to INEC.

He also maintained that the primary election that produced him as the party’s governorship candidate was conducted in the presence of INEC officials, who attended as observers.

Addressing his supporters, Adebutu said, “I am aware of the concerns following the omission of my name from INEC’s published list of Ogun governorship candidates for the 2027 election. I consider it important to address you directly and reassure you that there is no cause for alarm.

“I remain a duly registered member of the Peoples Democratic Party. I completed my digital registration within the stipulated period, and my membership card was printed and verified. My documentation was duly submitted to INEC within the prescribed time. I have not at any point left the PDP, and my commitment to our great party remains unwavering.

See also  2027: Ohanaeze Ndigbo Lagos declares support for Tinubu’s re-election

“The governorship primary that produced me as the party’s candidate was conducted with INEC officials in attendance as observers. The relevant documents were presented for verification, certification and confirmation. These are important facts that must not be overlooked in the present circumstances.”

Adebutu alleged that the Ogun State PDP had faced undue pressure from the ruling All Progressives Congress, questioning why his name was missing from the governorship list while the party’s candidates for the state House of Assembly, House of Representatives and Senate were included.

He said the party would pursue the matter through the appropriate channels, adding, “No amount of intimidation should prevent the people of Ogun State from having a fair opportunity to choose leaders of choice.”

The PDP candidate urged his supporters to remain steadfast, insisting that he would not abandon his ambition to lead the state.

However, Kayode Odunaro, Special Adviser on Media to the APC governorship candidate, Senator Solomon Adeola, dismissed Adebutu’s allegation that the ruling party had pressured INEC to exclude him.

Odunaro argued that the PDP should accept responsibility if it had failed to comply with the commission’s administrative procedures and electoral requirements.

“How can anyone now attribute the failure of PDP to follow through on simple administrative procedures and adherence to rules of the game to pressure from APC on INEC leading to the non-listing of their candidate as a contestant?

“Besides, other candidates from other states suffered the same fate as factional PDP in Ogun State for similar non-adherence to the law. The nationally comatose PDP should stop the blame game on APC and its flagbearer, Senator Solomon Adeola, for all their gambling tendencies in simple matters of following laid-down rules,” he said.

Odunaro added that the APC and its candidate were prepared to contest against any candidate recognised by INEC, arguing that it would be futile to focus on a candidate whose name did not appear on the commission’s list.

Pantami urges calm

In Gombe State, Pantami’s camp also appealed to supporters to remain calm, describing the omission as a temporary setback that could still be resolved within the period allowed by law.

The former minister emerged as the PDP governorship candidate following a fresh primary election held on September 29, 2026, after a Federal High Court order necessitated another exercise to determine the party’s flagbearer.

The spokesperson for the Pantamiyya Movement, Prof Suleiman Mohammed, acknowledged concerns among PDP members and Pantami’s supporters but maintained that the omission did not represent a final determination of the candidate’s political future.

In a statement shared by Pantami on Facebook, Mohammed said, “Our attention has been drawn to the non-publication of the name of our candidate from the fresh primary election of September 29, 2026, as ordered by the Federal High Court, Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim (Pantami).

“We wish to assure all our supporters to remain calm, steadfast, and hopeful. This is a temporary challenge and a normal part of the electoral process, not a final determination, in sha Allah.”

He said Pantami’s legal and liaison teams were engaging relevant party organs and INEC to address the omission and ensure compliance with the law.

“Our legal and liaison teams are already engaging with the relevant organs of the party and INEC to ensure full compliance and rectification within the window provided by law. By the grace of Allah, this matter will be resolved,” he said.

Mohammed further alleged that some individuals were working behind the scenes to frustrate what he described as responsible leadership in Gombe State, although he did not identify those allegedly involved.

He urged supporters to remain focused on mobilisation ahead of the election and not allow the development to disrupt their activities.

“We urge our supporters to continue their mobilisation and to remain focused on our collective ideology of service to humanity,” he said.

Gwarzo:   NDC kicks

The Nigeria Democratic Congress in Kano State has vowed to engage the Independent National Electoral Commission over the omission of its governorship candidate, Aminu Gwarzo, and his running mate, Mustapha Kwankwaso, from the final list.

The party’s state chairman, Hussaini Mairiga, said the names of the candidates were submitted to INEC in line with the applicable guidelines and statutory deadlines.

Mairiga attributed the omission to a possible administrative mix-up, insisting that it did not invalidate the party’s governorship ticket.

“Gwarzo’s name was submitted to INEC, and he and his running mate, Mustapha Rabiu Kwankwaso, are the authentic flagbearers of the party,” he said.

Expressing confidence that the discrepancy would be resolved, Mairiga added, “I believe there is a mix-up somewhere, and I do not think the list is from the commission, since we are sure that the name we submitted is what stands.”

He insisted that INEC was expected to recognise the candidates nominated by the party rather than substitute them with other names.

“INEC cannot substitute our names; they just have to work on the names we presented to them,” he said.

The party’s Public Relations Officer, Yusif Fasaha, also blamed the omission on a technical error, claiming that INEC had assured the party that the issue would be rectified.

See also  Fake agency probe: ICPC team grills embattled PFIPC DG inside police detention

“I want to assure you, as the PRO of the party, the problem is not from us. We have consulted the INEC, and they told us that the problem was from the computer, and they will rectify it,” Fasaha said in a statement reported by the News Agency of Nigeria.

However, INEC had not publicly confirmed that a computer error was responsible for the omission as of the time of filing this report.

AA threatens action

The Action Alliance has threatened to challenge the omission of some of its governorship and legislative candidates, describing the development as a possible technical error and warning against the disenfranchisement of legitimate candidates.

The party’s National Chairman and presidential candidate, Aare Adekunle Omo-Aje, disclosed this at a town hall meeting in Kaduna on Sunday, saying its legal team was preparing a formal complaint to INEC.

“There is no cause for alarm. All mechanisms are being put in place to address the issue and ensure that no legitimate candidate of the party is disenfranchised,” he said.

The party identified its affected governorship candidates as Eke Israel in Rivers State, Titilola-Sodo Dayo in Oyo State, Abdullah-Bukharin in Nasarawa State and Zubairu Musa in Bauchi State.

Omo-Aje said the omissions also affected some National Assembly and state House of Assembly candidates, adding that the party would continue to pursue the matter until the discrepancies were resolved.

“We are following up on all the cases diligently and will not relent until the issue is resolved in the interest of justice and democracy,” he said.

The AA chairman maintained that the party had complied with INEC’s guidelines and deadlines, expressing confidence that a review of the commission’s records would resolve the discrepancies.

He urged INEC to strengthen its verification procedures before publishing final candidates’ lists to prevent avoidable controversies and litigation ahead of the elections.

In Jigawa State, the African Democratic Congress also protested the omission of its endorsed deputy governorship candidate, Aminu Ringim, whose name was replaced by Musa Balarabe on the published list.

The party’s Deputy State Chairman, Nuraddeen Jidawa, confirmed that Ringim and about seven other candidates endorsed by the party were missing from the final list, despite its claim that their names had been submitted in accordance with INEC’s guidelines.

“The party doesn’t consider the released list as final. We will continue to reach out to the electoral umpire through any legal means,” Jidawa said.

He said the party was dissatisfied with the omissions and would continue to engage INEC over the affected candidates across several constituencies, including Hadejia/Auyo/Kafin Hausa, Kaugama and Birnin Kudu.

Jidawa called for compliance with constitutional and electoral requirements, expressing hope that the disputes would be resolved through the appropriate legal channels.

NDC cites mix-up

In Kaduna State, the NDC governorship candidate and former senator, Danjuma Tella La’ah, was also missing from INEC’s list amid an unresolved dispute over the party’s ticket.

The party’s state chairman, Evangelist Mordecai Ibrahim, attributed the omission to discrepancies in the registration of La’ah’s name, explaining that network problems during the online registration process led to multiple registration attempts and a subsequent mix-up.

“The problem is that there was a mix-up of names. The person who registered him made a mistake because, each time there were network issues, we got several people to try registering him,” Ibrahim said.

He added, “They are trying to make sure that Danjuma Tella La’ah and Danjuma La’ah are the same person. That is all.”

The chairman expressed confidence that the discrepancy would be resolved, insisting that the party and its candidate were qualified to participate in the election.

He said legal options could be explored if necessary, citing a previous election in which, according to him, a court ordered the inclusion of a candidate on the ballot shortly before the poll.

However, Ibrahim did not disclose whether the party had formally petitioned INEC over the alleged registration error or initiated legal proceedings to secure La’ah’s inclusion.

The omission came amid an earlier disagreement within the NDC over who should represent the party in the Kaduna governorship election.

In August, Ibrahim said the party had yet to decide between La’ah and lawyer Mohammed Abbas.

“The bitter truth is that both at the state and national levels, the decision as to who the governorship candidate of Kaduna State, whether Barrister Mohammed Sani Abbas or Senator Danjuma Tella La’ah, has not been taken,” he had said.

INEC had not responded to the chairman’s explanation as of the time of filing this report.

Others report omissions

The omissions have also affected candidates of other political parties across several states.

In Benue State, the Social Democratic Party’s governorship candidate, Prof Sebastine Hon, SAN, was missing from INEC’s list of 13 candidates.

The party’s state chairman, Idoko Itodo, described the omission as a possible error and expressed confidence that the commission would correct it.

“The omission of our governorship candidate on the latest list must be an error; it has nothing to do with the Supreme Court judgment because our candidate had registered as a party member before the deadline for submission of party membership,” Itodo said.

See also  Obi won’t join d—ollarised primaries, Obidients reply Atiku

He said the party would take up the matter with INEC, insisting that Hon had fulfilled the membership requirements.

In Bauchi State, the SDP said it would convene an emergency meeting to discuss the omission of some candidates, including its governorship candidate.

The party’s state chairman, Nasiru Dan-Bauchi, linked the development to the party’s internal crisis, adding that the state chapter would communicate its position to the national leadership after deliberations.

The New Nigeria Peoples Party also appealed for calm following the omission of its Bauchi governorship candidate, Ambassador Shuaibu Ahmed.

The party’s state chairman, Abdulkareem Matori, said the NNPP believed the omission was inadvertent and was taking steps to engage INEC and other relevant authorities.

“The NNPP understands the disquiet and apprehension this omission has raised among our teeming supporters across Bauchi State,” Matori said.

He urged members and supporters to remain united and focused on grassroots mobilisation, expressing confidence that the matter would be resolved through the appropriate legal channels.

“We are confident that the matter will be addressed through the appropriate lawful channels. Amb. Shuaibu Ahmed remains in the race and shall be Bauchi State Governor come 2027,” he said.

In Plateau State, PDP governorship aspirant Sunday Biggs was also missing from the list, while Ropshik Wungak appeared as the party’s candidate, with Kim Dung listed as his running mate.

A PDP official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, linked the development to the leadership dispute between the factions associated with FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and Tanimu Turaki, which was pending before the Court of Appeal.

“We have no problem with his missing name. Don’t forget the matter is still in court. In fact, there was a hearing last week because we have this case between Wike and Turaki group which is still pending in the Court of Appeal,” the official said.

In Nasarawa State, the Accord Party’s governorship candidate, Shuaibu Kubi, was not listed. Bukhari Nata’ala of the Action Alliance, whose name had appeared on an earlier list, was also missing from the final publication.

Party ticket disputes

In Lagos State, the controversy has centred largely on disputes over party nominations and the replacement of candidates, particularly within the ruling All Progressives Congress.

In Agege Constituencies I and II, Ganiyu Egunjobi and Azeez Ninalowo reportedly won the APC primaries but were subsequently dropped from the party’s final tickets. Both later defected to the Allied Peoples Movement, while their replacements appeared on INEC’s final list.

The case of Noheem Adams, the Lagos State House of Assembly Majority Leader, also drew attention. Adams reportedly won the APC primary for Eti-Osa Constituency I with 7,638 votes, against Saheed Bankole’s 1,225, but was subsequently displaced by Bankole, whose name appeared as the party’s candidate on INEC’s final list.

In Oyo State, the SDP candidate, Mogaji Agboola, was omitted after the party reportedly replaced its earlier candidate, Michael Okunlade. The development raised concerns among party stakeholders, while other candidates on the list faced separate nomination disputes.

In Borno State, the NDC said several of its candidates, particularly those contesting State House of Assembly seats, were missing from INEC’s list.

The party’s Publicity Secretary, Aliyu Balarabe, said the state chapter was still identifying the omissions before deciding on a collective response.

“There are a lot of issues, but I can’t talk about it for now. It is just like an internal crisis,” he said.

Balarabe added that some names on the State Assembly list were unfamiliar to the state chapter, including that of a candidate he said was from Adamawa State.

The ADC, however, said all its candidates in Borno State had been included on the list.

 

Age controversy

In Kwara State, the African Action Congress governorship candidate, Duwatsu Musa, was excluded from the final list after INEC determined that he had not attained the constitutionally prescribed minimum age to contest the election.

Musa, who confirmed his age to The PUNCH on Sunday, said he was 34 and would turn 35 in February 2027.

“I am currently 34, but will clock 35 next February,” he said.

Section 177(b) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, stipulates that a person must have attained the age of 35 to qualify for election as governor.

Reacting to his exclusion in a Facebook post on Saturday, Musa said the decision would not stop him from expressing his political views ahead of the election.

“INEC has removed my name from the final list on the grounds of age, but this will not stop me from making my political position known,” he said.

He added that he would announce in the coming days the candidate he and his supporters intended to back, as well as their political direction, while urging party members and followers to remain calm and united

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Traditional rulers face neutrality test as politicians storm palaces ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

As political interests increasingly seek the influence of traditional institutions, Nigeria’s royal fathers face a delicate battle to preserve their neutrality, authority and place above partisan divisions, writes CHIMA AZUBUIKE

When the Emir of Gombe, Abubakar-Shehu Abubakar III, declared that traditional rulers belonged to no political party and would not allow personal considerations to divide the communities entrusted to their care, his message resonated beyond the confines of his palace. Abubakar echoed this imperative when the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof Joash Amupitan, visited him in his palace last Monday. The visit touched on one of the most delicate questions in Nigeria’s political landscape: whether traditional institutions can remain impartial despite the fact that their positions, privileges and continued relevance are often tied to the political establishment. It was also a timely reminder of the responsibility traditional rulers bear as custodians of community values, mediators in local disputes and influential voices in grassroots political engagement. The visits of political office holders, political office seekers to palaces is bound to increase ahead of the 2027 elections.

Amupitan’s visit was part of INEC’s North-East zonal interactive meeting with electoral officials and stakeholders ahead of the 2027 general election. Beyond seeking royal blessings and prayers, the engagement offered an opportunity to reflect on the influence traditional rulers wield over their subjects and the extent to which that influence can contribute to credible elections.

The emir’s position was unambiguous: traditional rulers must serve everyone, regardless of political affiliation, religious beliefs or social background. He said, “As royal rulers, we recognise that free and peaceful elections are essential to the stability, unity and progress of our country.

“Our task is to ensure that we are in a unique position in this regard. Royal fathers serve all our subjects irrespective of their political affiliation, religious beliefs or social backgrounds.

“We belong to no political party, and we have never allowed our personal considerations to divide the community entrusted to our care. This is a responsibility we take very seriously.”

It was a statement of principle, but one that also raises the question: How can traditional rulers remain politically neutral when the political system within which they operate sometimes rewards loyalty and punishes perceived disloyalty?

Across Nigeria, traditional rulers occupy a complicated position. They are expected to be above partisan politics, yet they operate in an environment where political actors frequently seek their endorsement, blessings and influence. Their palaces are important stops for politicians seeking legitimacy, while their public appearances can be interpreted as signals of political preference.

For many politicians, a royal reception is more than a courtesy call. It is an opportunity to demonstrate acceptance by the community, mobilise grassroots support and communicate political strength to rivals.

Conversely, an absent monarch, a closed palace gate or a reception organised away from the traditional seat of authority can become a political statement in itself.

The emir’s declaration invites a deeper examination of whether traditional rulers can successfully separate their public responsibilities from the political calculations that increasingly shape their relationships with elected officials.

Traditional rulers have long occupied an important place in Nigeria’s community life. Their influence extends beyond ceremonial functions to conflict resolution, cultural preservation, mobilisation for development and mediation between governments and citizens.

In many rural communities, they remain among the most accessible authorities. Their words carry weight because of longstanding cultural relationships, inherited institutions and their familiarity with local grievances. That proximity to the people makes them valuable partners in electoral administration.

While INEC is responsible for organising elections, it cannot independently resolve issues of voter apathy, community tensions, misinformation and resistance to electoral participation. Traditional rulers can easily help bridge that gap. They can explain the importance of voter registration, encourage eligible citizens to collect their Permanent Voter Cards, discourage political violence and urge residents to resolve disagreements through lawful democratic processes. They can also challenge attempts by political actors to exploit ethnic, religious or communal divisions for electoral advantage.

See also  Dele Farotimi dismisses Jonathan’s political return, urges focus on these structural problems

But the same influence that makes traditional rulers valuable to electoral administration can become problematic when deployed in the service of partisan interests.

Recollections by some Nigerians suggest that the relationship between traditional institutions and political competition has not always matched the ideal of neutrality expressed by the Emir of Gombe.

Samaila Dati, a Gombe resident, recalled an incident in which an emir allegedly shut his palace gates because he feared receiving a governor who was then seeking election.

According to Dati, the experience illustrated the difficulties politicians can encounter when traditional rulers are caught between their responsibility to serve the entire community and their relationship with the incumbent political leadership.

“Today’s Gombe governor tasted that bitter pill during his campaign to one of the emirates in the north. The emir failed to turn up despite being informed about the engagement. It took party loyalists who are members of the emirate to organise a reception in another location to welcome the current governor, who was then a candidate,” he added.

The account, as recalled by Dati, illustrates how a palace can become an arena for political calculations even when the traditional ruler’s public responsibility is to maintain open channels of communication with all political actors.

For a candidate seeking office, access to a traditional ruler can be an opportunity to present campaign promises, discuss community needs and demonstrate respect for local institutions. When that access is denied because of political considerations, the encounter risks sending a message that the community is closed to a particular political interest.

The consequences can extend beyond the immediate political contest. Where residents perceive that a traditional ruler favours one political camp, those who support opposing parties may begin to question whether the palace remains an impartial institution.

Such perceptions can weaken the palace’s ability to mediate disputes after elections, especially when political disagreements spill into family relationships, community associations and local development initiatives.

Dati’s recollection offers a perspective on the political pressures facing traditional rulers, but the circumstances surrounding the incident would require independent verification and a response from the emir concerned.

Dati’s account raises the question: should access to traditional institutions depend on a politician’s relationship with the government of the day, or should every credible political actor be treated with the same measure of courtesy?

For those who believe that traditional rulers must remain impartial, the answer should be straightforward.

Danladi Adamu, a teacher, said that tensions could emerge in the relationship between political officeholders and traditional institutions when monarchs are perceived to be close to politicians opposed to the sitting governor.

Adamu referred to the political disagreements between Governor Muhammadu Yahaya and his predecessor, Governor Danjuma Goje, during which, according to him, some traditional rulers came under pressure.

He said, “Recall Governor Inuwa Yahaya’s political tussle with his former boss, Governor Danjuma Goje. Some emirs were nearly affected, including the Emirs of Gona in Akko Local Government Area and Deba in Yamaltu-Deba LGA, but thank God for how they were resolved.”

The accounts point to the vulnerability of traditional institutions when political disagreements between powerful individuals extend into the structures of customary authority.

Adamu’s recollection does not, on its own, establish the full circumstances of the tensions he described. But it reflects a concern that deserves serious attention: the extent to which political rivalries can expose traditional rulers to pressure and threaten their ability to serve communities impartially.

For Mohammed Ahmed, a civil servant, the problem runs deeper than individual incidents involving palace visits. He believes the process through which traditional rulers are selected, nominated or recognised can influence their willingness to challenge political authorities. Ahmed invoked a popular maxim to explain his position. “He who pays the piper determines the tune,” he said. He argued that traditional rulers would struggle to remain neutral while depending on politicians for their selection and continued security in office.

“Until traditional rulers stop depending on politicians for their selection and nomination, they cannot be neutral; they can’t see something bad and say it. They will continue to be underdogs, busy watching the body language of the governors and chairmen. They will continue to be partisan,” Ahmed added. His argument raises a structural question about the relationship between traditional institutions and democratic governance.

See also  Wiretapping: El-Rufai to file no-case submission as DSS closes case

In Nigeria, traditional institutions are not uniform. Their succession arrangements differ according to local customs, historical practices and the legal frameworks governing chieftaincy matters in individual states.

In some communities, succession involves kingmakers or other customary authorities. State governments may also have formal roles in recognition, approval or the administration of chieftaincy affairs, depending on the applicable law.

Ahmed’s argument is that such dependence can turn traditional rulers into observers of political signals rather than independent voices of community interest.

The visit by Amupitan to the Gombe Emir’s Palace, therefore, carried significance beyond its ceremonial setting. The INEC chairman said the commission was consulting traditional rulers across the country to seek their blessings, prayers and support ahead of the 2027 general elections.

He explained that the North-East was the fourth geopolitical zone visited by the commission as part of its readiness assessment, following similar engagements in the South-West, North-West and South-East.

“We have visited other zones. We started with the South-West. From there, we moved to the North-West, and then to the South-East. Today, we are in the North-East,” he said.

Amupitan acknowledged the importance of traditional rulers in electoral administration, particularly in mobilising voters and promoting peaceful participation.

“Your role cannot be underestimated, most especially in ensuring the success of the 2027 general election. I am delighted to lead my team here today to seek your blessings, prayers and support,” he told the emir.

The chairman said the North-East had approximately 19.96 million registered voters, representing 13.51 per cent of Nigeria’s total registered voters.

The figures underline the region’s significance in the national electoral process and the need to ensure that eligible citizens are able to participate without intimidation, misinformation or avoidable administrative obstacles.

Amupitan appealed to the emir to mobilise eligible voters to collect their Permanent Voter Cards, emphasising that the cards were necessary for exercising their voting rights.

“Collection of PVCs is currently ongoing. It is not a favour anybody is doing the electorate to come out and vote, but you cannot vote without your PVC. We want your Royal Highness to help INEC mobilise the electorate to go out and collect their PVCs so that they can exercise their voting rights,” he said.

He urged the emir to appeal to political leaders to conduct their campaigns peacefully and discourage actions capable of undermining the electoral process.

The INEC chairman also sought the support of traditional rulers in tackling misinformation and disinformation, warning that false reports circulated on social media could cause panic, discourage voter participation and incite violence.

“People will start posting fake news, claiming that there is fighting or killing when it is not true, most of the time. We are appealing to your Royal Highness to help educate our people so that they will not be carried away by fake news and can verify information before it causes panic,” he said.

Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to impartiality, assuring Nigerians that INEC would work towards delivering free, fair, inclusive and credible elections.

“INEC is committed, I can assure you, sir, and the good people of Gombe State that under my watch, INEC will remain absolutely impartial. We have no candidate of our own, but we will do everything possible to conduct a free, fair, inclusive and credible election come 2027,” he said.

The parallel between INEC’s commitment and the emir’s declaration is significant. Both institutions must demonstrate impartiality not merely through public statements but through decisions that citizens can observe and evaluate.

For INEC, that means applying electoral rules consistently, providing accurate information and ensuring that eligible voters can participate in accordance with the law.

For traditional rulers, it means opening channels of communication to competing political interests, discouraging violence regardless of who is responsible and resisting pressure to turn customary authority into an instrument of electoral advantage.

See also  Fake agency probe: ICPC team grills embattled PFIPC DG inside police detention

The INEC chairman’s appeal for traditional rulers to combat misinformation is especially relevant. False reports can inflame communal tensions, undermine confidence in electoral procedures and create confusion about where and when citizens can vote.

Traditional rulers can help counter such narratives by communicating verified information through community meetings, religious and cultural gatherings, local networks and other trusted channels.

The Emir of Gombe’s declaration provides a standard against which the conduct of traditional institutions can be assessed as Nigeria approaches another general election.

But it is not enough for a monarch to announce that he belongs to no political party. It must be reflected in how the palace treats competing political actors and how the ruler responds when political interests threaten to divide the community.

A traditional ruler need not pretend to have no personal political opinions. Like other citizens, he may have views about public affairs. The more important distinction is between personal preference and the exercise of public authority.

The responsibility of the office requires that personal sympathies should not determine access to the palace, the distribution of communal attention or the willingness to mediate disputes involving competing political interests.

As the 2027 elections approach, Nigeria’s traditional institutions face an important opportunity to reaffirm their relevance in a changing political environment. Their influence will be most valuable when it is used to strengthen peaceful coexistence, protect civic participation and preserve channels of communication across political divisions.

The challenge is particularly acute in communities where access to public authorities is often mediated through traditional leaders. If a palace closes its doors to political opponents, it risks narrowing the space for democratic engagement. If it welcomes competing interests fairly, it can demonstrate that political disagreement does not have to become social hostility.

The experiences recalled by Dati, Adamu and Ahmed suggest that the question of royal neutrality cannot be resolved through appeals for good conduct alone. It also requires attention to the institutional arrangements and political relationships that may discourage traditional rulers from acting independently.

Governments must respect the distinction between their constitutional responsibilities and the customary authority exercised by traditional institutions. Political parties must recognise that a monarch’s willingness to receive an opponent is not an act of hostility. Traditional rulers, for their part, must resist the temptation to trade impartiality for political favour.

Communities also have a role to play by demanding fairness, encouraging accountability and rejecting attempts to portray political access as a privilege reserved for supporters of those in power.

Ultimately, the credibility of a traditional institution is measured not by the number of politicians who visit its palace but by the confidence people across political divides place in its ability to serve them fairly.

The Emir of Gombe’s declaration that traditional rulers belong to no political party offers a starting point. The more difficult task is ensuring that the principle survives the pressures of electoral competition.

For Nigeria’s democracy to benefit fully from the influence of traditional institutions, the palace must remain a place where political differences can be acknowledged without becoming grounds for exclusion.

The true test of neutrality, therefore, is not whether traditional rulers can avoid wearing party colours. It is whether they can protect the dignity and rights of people who wear different political colours.

As the countdown to 2027 continues, Nigeria needs traditional institutions that can stand above partisan rivalries without standing apart from the concerns of their communities.

The palace should not be a campaign office, an extension of a governor’s political structure or a refuge for one faction against another. It should remain a meeting point for the community in all its diversity. Only then will the declaration that traditional rulers belong to no political party become more than a believable statement.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Makinde’s commissioner, two aides resign, read why

Published

on

Three key appointees of the Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, officially resigned from the state cabinet on Monday.

They were the Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planning, Ayobami Ojo; Special Adviser on Budget and Economic Planning, Adegbola Oyeleke; and a member of the state Independent Electoral Commission, Sunday Falana.

Ojo, who hails from Ago-Are in Atisbo Local Government Area of the state, communicated his resignation in a letter addressed to the governor through the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Musibau Babatunde.

The PUNCH reports that in October, the governor’s Chief of Staff, Segun Ogunwuyi, resigned after more than five years in office.

His resignation was followed by that of the former Director-General of the state’s Due Process Office, Tara Adefope.

Ogunwuyi, a former member of the House of Representatives, did not publicly disclose his reason for resigning.

Following his departure, Makinde appointed Akinwole Akinwole as his replacement, while Aderonke Adedayo was appointed Director-General of the Due Process Office.

However, Ojo, on Monday, referenced his appointment letter dated June 22, 2026, and said his resignation takes immediate effect.

Ojo, who did not disclose his reason for leaving the state Executive Council, expressed appreciation to Makinde for the confidence reposed in him and the opportunity to serve the state.

Also, a former two-term member of the state House of Assembly and former council chairman, Oyeleke, announced his resignation as Special Adviser on Budget and Economic Planning.

Oyeleke, in his letter dated November 2, 2026, and addressed directly to Makinde, said he was no longer comfortable with the working environment in the administration.

See also  Presidential panels rack up N13bn bill

He added that the circumstances had made it difficult for him to effectively pursue and fulfil the aspirations of his people while serving in the government.

Oyeleke, however, appreciated the governor for his leadership, encouragement, support, as well as the opportunity to contribute to the administration’s policies and development programmes.

He wrote, “I sincerely appreciate Your Excellency’s leadership, encouragement, support and the invaluable experience I have gained during my period of service. I remain grateful for the opportunity to have been part of this administration and to have contributed to its laudable achievements.”

The third official, Falana, who hails from Ogbomoso, also resigned his appointment as a member of OYSIEC.

In a letter dated November 2 and addressed to the governor through the Chief of Staff, Falana announced that his resignation would take immediate effect.

He did not disclose the reason for his decision but thanked Makinde for the opportunity to serve on the state’s electoral management body, describing his experience as “worthwhile.”

When The PUNCH contacted the Director-General, Media and Publicity, Bimbo Adekanmbi Campaign Council, Yinka Oladoyinbo, in Ibadan, the state capital, on Monday, he said, “The resignation will not affect the chances of our candidate (APM) in the next election. This election is not about politicians alone; it’s about the people of Oyo.

“It’s about 7.9 million people of Oyo, and they are the ones that going to decide who become the governor.

“As people are moving out of Allied People’s Movement, we also have people that are moving into APM. Like my principal said this afternoon, this is the moment we call the transfer market in politics; it’s in football. Some people would come, some people would go.

See also  Lagos APC exco member, Yesiro dies hours before inauguration

“But the ultimate power resides with the people. It is the people in the majority who will decide who becomes the governor of Oyo State, and we have the majority on our side.

“So, definitely, politicians moving or resigning will not affect our party’s chances negatively in the next general elections,” Oladoyinbo insisted.

Meanwhile, the latest departures add to the growing list of officials who have left the Makinde administration in recent months.

Other notable officials who had left their positions include former Commissioner of Police and Special Adviser on Security, Fatai Owoseni; former member of the state Advisory Council, Babatunde Oduyoye; and former Senior Special Assistant on Diaspora Matters, Funmi Arulogun.

Also included were the former Chairman of the Governing Board of the College of Agriculture, Igboora, Damilare Gideon Amusan, and former lawmaker, Peter Oyetunji.

Four other appointees — Joshua Olusola Afolabi, Rebecca Oladoja Agbejimi, Noah Adeyanju and Suleiman Adegbola — also resigned their appointments on October 19.

In a related development, the Executive Chairman of Ogbomoso North Local Government, Jimoh Idowu, resigned his membership of the APM.

Idowu announced his decision in a letter addressed to the party’s executives in the local government on Monday, expressing “appreciation for the opportunity to serve and his contributions to grassroots mobilisation and party unity.”

He also promised to hand over party documents, assets and records to the appropriate authorities.

The development comes as the state Independent Electoral Commission prepares for the December 29, 2026 local government elections across the 33 LGAs.

See also  Osun backs deputy gov, ex-PDP secretary despite anti-party allegations

The commission released its final list of candidates on October 27.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Natasha begins re-election campaign in Kogi ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on Sunday commenced her re-election campaign across Kogi Central ahead of the February 6, 2027 senatorial election, with her supporters and Peoples Democratic Party candidates joining the campaign engagements.

The campaign featured roadside receptions across communities in Okene and other parts of the district, culminating in a gathering at the senator’s residence in Obeiba, Ihima, Okehi Local Government Area.

Her media aide, Mike Idoko, disclosed this in a statement issued in Abuja on Monday.

The campaign activities attracted party members, community leaders, political stakeholders and supporters, while PDP candidates contesting National Assembly and Kogi State House of Assembly seats in the district also participated.

Akpoti-Uduaghan, accompanied by her husband, Emmanuel Uduaghan, and other political associates, used the engagements to reaffirm her commitment to quality representation, constituency development, and legislative advocacy.

She said her relationship with the people of Kogi Central went beyond elections, adding that their support remained a source of motivation for her public service.

“My relationship with the people of Kogi Central goes beyond elections. These are my people, my family and the very reason I remain committed to public service. I do not need an election season to remember where I come from or who entrusted me with the responsibility of representing them.

“What we witnessed today is a reflection of the bond we have continued to build over time. I am deeply grateful to everyone who came out, not because they were compelled to do so, but because they believe in the journey we have undertaken together. Their love and confidence mean a great deal to me, and I will never take them for granted,” she said.

See also  Presidential aide defends Tinubu’s Falcons rewards, cites BBNaija N150m prize money

The senator also pledged to intensify efforts to attract infrastructure, economic opportunities and other development projects to the district, particularly the Ajaokuta area, whose development concerns she said required sustained attention.

She stressed that effective representation should go beyond occupying public office to include regular engagement with constituents, responsiveness to their needs and purposeful legislative interventions.

Among those who participated in the campaign were PDP candidates for the House of Representatives seats representing Adavi/Okehi, Ajaokuta and Okene/Ogori-Magongo Federal Constituencies, as well as the party’s candidates for the various Kogi State House of Assembly constituencies in Kogi Central.

Their participation provided an opportunity for party members and candidates to strengthen their cooperation ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The statement said thousands of supporters gathered at the senator’s Ihima residence, with many remaining there late into the night.

Kogi Central comprises five local government areas: Adavi, Ajaokuta, Okehi, Okene and Ogori-Magongo.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending