Connect with us

Politics

Otti’s LP bloc seeks reconciliation as court sacks Abure

Published

on

The Labour Party faction loyal to Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, has called for reconciliation and unity in the party following Wednesday’s judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission  to recognise the Senator Nenadi Usman-led caretaker committee and effectively sacked Julius Abure as national chairman.

The Interim National Chairman of the faction, Senator Nenadi Usman, made the appeal in a statement issued by her Senior Special Adviser on Media, Ken Asogwa, describing the ruling as a critical opportunity to heal deep-seated divisions within the party rather than worsen the leadership crisis.

“We received with profound joy and relief the judgment of the Federal High Court, which ordered INEC to immediately recognise Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership as the only valid, authentic and legitimate leadership of the Labour Party,” the statement said.

“Although the journey to this point was protracted, difficult and at times turbulent, the Labour Party urges its members and supporters not to celebrate with triumphalism. Rather, this moment should be embraced as a solemn opportunity for genuine reconciliation.”

According to Usman, the judgment should mark a turning point for the party.

“For us, it is a no victor, no vanquished moment. Let it be clearly stated that there is only one united and indivisible Labour Party in Nigeria. This judgment must mark a new beginning anchored on unity, healing and collective progress,” she said.

However, in a swift statement on Wednesday, Abure rejected the judgment, vowing to challenge it on appeal.

In a statement issued by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh, Abure insisted that the judgment contradicted the April 2025 verdict of the Supreme Court on the party’s leadership dispute.

He described Justice Lifu’s verdict as a misinterpretation of the apex court’s decision and an unwarranted intrusion into the internal affairs of the party.

See also  PDP factions open peace talks as Wike denies split

“Although we are yet to see the Certified True Copy of the judgment to fully make detailed comments, it is clear from the brief available to us that the party will appeal,” Ifoh said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court held that Abure’s tenure as national chairman had elapsed and consequently ordered INEC to recognise the caretaker committee headed by Usman pending the conduct of the party’s national convention.

Reacting to the judgment, the Otti-backed faction urged all tendencies within the party, including those dissatisfied with the ruling, to embrace dialogue in the interest of rebuilding the party.

“Accordingly, the Labour Party calls on all members who may feel aggrieved by the current state of affairs – including those against whom today’s judgment was delivered – to sheathe their swords and embrace dialogue in the supreme interest of the party,” Usman said.

“We sue for peace, plead for dialogue, and seek sincere reconciliation. There is enormous work ahead in rebuilding the Labour Party into a strong, credible and virile opposition platform in Nigeria, a task that can only be accomplished in an atmosphere of unity, cohesion and mutual respect.”

As part of efforts to restore internal harmony, Usman announced plans to constitute a reconciliation mechanism.

“In furtherance of this commitment to peace and reconciliation, the party shall immediately constitute a Truce and Reconciliation Committee mandated to engage all aggrieved members and restore lasting harmony within the party,” she said.

The faction also called on INEC to fully comply with the judgment.

“As a law-abiding institution and a major stakeholder in Nigeria’s democratic process, the Labour Party calls on INEC to end all unnecessary distractions by fully complying with today’s judgment and according Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership the formal recognition clearly and unambiguously directed by the court,” the statement added.

On its part, the Abure-led faction alleged procedural irregularities in the handling of the case, claiming it was denied fair hearing and that warning signs emerged even before judgment was delivered.

See also  Over 6.2 million Nigerians complete online voter pre-registration – INEC

“Before today’s judgment, we had suspected it might go this way because of the body language around the court. When the matter was first filed, it was assigned to Justice Omotosho, but suddenly there was a somersault, as another similar matter was filed, the first was withdrawn and the case was reassigned to Justice Peter Lifu. That was a red flag for us,” the statement said.

The faction further alleged that the court refused to allow it respond to issues raised in a counter-affidavit before adjourning for judgment.

“The court refused us the opportunity to respond to issues raised in the counter-affidavit filed by other parties and quickly adjourned for judgment. That was the second red flag,” Ifoh said.

Abure’s camp also questioned the substance of the ruling, arguing that it contradicted established judicial precedents.

“Nigerians should remember that the Court of Appeal had pronounced Julius Abure’s National Working Committee as the authentic leadership of the party. That was what Nenadi Usman took to the Supreme Court, arguing that the courts lacked the power to determine party leadership.

“Ironically, today a Federal High Court has gone ahead to pronounce someone as caretaker national chairman of a party. So what is the judiciary turning into?” the statement queried.

The faction insisted that the Supreme Court had clearly ruled that courts lacked jurisdiction to appoint leaders for political parties and maintained that no leadership vacuum existed in the Labour Party.

“Even the Supreme Court never said our tenure had expired. It simply declined jurisdiction, holding that leadership matters are internal affairs of the party,” the statement said.

See also  VIDEO: Enugu Governor, Peter Mbah Joins APC

It further defended the March 2024 national convention, insisting that the tenure of the party’s executive was still subsisting at the time the convention was held.

“So for the court to say that the tenure had expired and that a vacuum existed is laughable. It is also curious how the court arrived at that conclusion without interrogating the validity and legality of the national convention held on March 27, 2024,” the statement added.

Despite the legal battle, the Abure faction urged party members to remain calm, insisting it would exhaust all legal avenues to reclaim its position.

“The party is not for sale, and no amount of financial power will make us abdicate our leadership position,” it warned.

The leadership crisis in the Labour Party followed an expanded stakeholders’ meeting held in Umuahia, Abia State, where the National Executive Committee resolved to remove Abure as national chairman and constituted a 29-member caretaker committee headed by Usman.

The meeting was hosted by Governor Otti and chaired by the party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

In April 2025, the Supreme Court set aside an earlier judgment of the Court of Appeal that had recognised Abure as national chairman, holding that appellate courts lacked jurisdiction to determine the leadership of a political party.

Justice Lifu, relying on the subsisting position of the Supreme Court, ruled that the caretaker committee constituted by the NEC remained the only valid authority to act for and represent the Labour Party pending the conduct of a national convention.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Oyebanji re-election in Ekiti will validate Tinubu’s influence — APC chieftain

Published

on

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress and House of Representatives aspirant, Henrich Akomolafe, has said the expected victory of Ekiti State Governor, Biodun Oyebanji, in the June 20, 2026, election would serve as a referendum on the leadership of President Bola Tinubu.

Speaking with journalists during a political consultation meeting on Tuesday, Akomolafe framed the Ekiti poll as more than a state contest, arguing that it would also reflect public confidence in the broader direction of the APC-led Federal Government.

He described Oyebanji as a performer and bridge-builder whose administration has brought stability, development and renewed confidence in governance in Ekiti State.

According to him, the governor’s leadership style—anchored on service, humility and visible results—has strengthened public trust and positioned him for electoral success.

“Ekiti people are politically conscious and always assess performance before making electoral decisions. Governor Oyebanji has built trust through his record, and that trust will translate into votes,” he said.

Akomolafe added that Oyebanji’s policies prioritised the welfare of workers, youths, farmers and traditional institutions, noting that his inclusive governance approach had helped sustain peace and unity across the state.

The APC chieftain also linked the governor’s anticipated victory to growing acceptance of Tinubu’s economic reforms, which he described as bold but necessary steps toward long-term national stability.

“Transformational leadership requires courage. The support Oyebanji will receive will also reflect public understanding of the President’s vision,” he added.

While acknowledging the short-term hardships associated with ongoing reforms, Akomolafe maintained that many Nigerians were beginning to see their long-term benefits.

See also  Rising opposition attacks spark concerns ahead of 2027 elections

He further called for unity within the party, particularly in Ekiti South Federal Constituency I, urging intensified grassroots mobilisation to secure victory for the APC across all levels in the election.

Akomolafe also appealed to youths, women and community leaders to rally behind leaders committed to service delivery, stressing that the upcoming governorship poll would be pivotal to consolidating development gains and sustaining peace in Ekiti State.

Continue Reading

Politics

El-Rufai may miss ADC presidential primary, see why

Published

on

A Kaduna State High Court on Tuesday ordered that former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, remain in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, pending a ruling on his bail application.

The trial judge, Darius Khobo, fixed the first week of June for ruling after listening to arguments from both the prosecution and the defence on the bail request.

With the development, the former governor may not participate in the activities leading to the presidential, governorship and National Assembly primaries of the African Democratic Congress.

By the Independent National Electoral Commission timetable, party primaries are to commence on April 23, 2026 and end by May 30, 2026.

The ADC has yet to fix a date for its presidential primary, as the David Mark-led faction and the Nafiu Bala-led faction battle at the Supreme Court over the party’s authentic leadership.

The apex court fixed today (Wednesday) for the hearing of an appeal arising from the leadership crisis in the ADC.

El-Rufai is standing trial on an amended nine-count charge bordering on alleged fraud, abuse of office and corruption.

The anti-graft agency had earlier amended the charge, leaving the former governor as the sole defendant before the Kaduna State High Court.

A Federal High Court earlier granted the former governor N200m bail, with additional conditions.

At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, proceedings were dominated by arguments on the defendant’s application for bail.

Counsel for the ICPC opposed the application, arguing that granting bail could undermine ongoing investigations, alleging that the defendant might interfere with witnesses or evidence.

See also  GO TO HELL! —Trump tells Democratic senate leader Schumer

However, the court declined to deliver an immediate ruling, instead ordering that El-Rufai be remanded in ICPC custody pending its decision.

Reacting, counsel for the defendant, Ubong Akpan, faulted the court’s position, describing it as unjustified and suggestive of deeper concerns.

He argued that the refusal to grant bail appeared to be premised on the assumption that his client’s status as a former governor could enable him to tamper with investigations.

“The court, in its wisdom, decided that because Nasir El-Rufai is a former governor, he is going to interfere with the investigation. Therefore, he is not entitled to bail in an allegation of financial impropriety. We respectfully disagree,” he said.

Akpan stated that the defence team would review the ruling and take appropriate legal steps to challenge it.

“The next step is to take the legal steps required to challenge it. We will respond through the proper legal process. That is what the law requires,” he added.

The defence lawyer further maintained that the case had political undertones, but stressed that the team would remain guided by the rule of law.

“From the beginning, everything about Nasir El-Rufai’s travails has always been political. This is mainly the legal arm of it,” he said.

He also urged supporters of the former governor to remain calm and law-abiding.

“Don’t allow fear to take over. Don’t act as if something fatal has happened. Nobody has died.

“In a conflict, you have gains and setbacks. Sometimes things work against you, but you must not be frightened. Sit up. We are going to take this battle on, and we are going to win,” he said.

See also  VIDEO: Enugu Governor, Peter Mbah Joins APC

The matter was adjourned to the first week of June for ruling on the bail application and continuation of proceedings.

El-Rufai, who returned to the country from Cairo, Egypt, on February 12, 2026.

Following his arrival, he has been involved in multiple legal proceedings, including investigations by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and subsequently the ICPC, and the Department of State Service.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Abure vows appeal after A’Court affirms Usman Labour Party chair

Published

on

The leadership crisis rocking the Labour Party deepened on Tuesday as factional National Chairman, Julius Abure, rejected the judgment of the Court of Appeal, vowing to challenge it at the Supreme Court.

Abure, in a statement made available to journalists in Abuja, dismissed the appellate court’s ruling, which affirmed the leadership of Nenadi Usman, insisting it ran contrary to established legal principles and party procedures.

He argued that party leadership issues remained an internal matter beyond the scope of judicial interference, adding that the court’s decision did not align with existing legal precedents.

“We have seen what transpired today at the Appeal Court, and we want to say very clearly that the judgment is not acceptable to all of us in the Labour Party, led by my humble self.

“I want to say very clearly that the judgment is against all known principles of law. The courts, the Supreme Court and all courts in Nigeria have stated very clearly that the issue of leadership of a political party is an internal affair of a political party.

“It is also not true, and I disagree when people say that the tenure of this executive has expired. That is untrue and very unacceptable to us,” he stated.

Earlier, a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal in Abuja unanimously dismissed Abure’s appeal, describing it as unconvincing and lacking legal foundation.

The court upheld the earlier judgment of the Federal High Court, which had affirmed Usman’s leadership.

Abure held that the party’s convention in Nnewi on March 27, 2024, produced a valid leadership expected to run for four years.

According to him, the court failed to properly consider this in reaching its conclusion.

See also  I'm not done yet - Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris says she may run for president again

He said, “I want to say that the court today didn’t look at that before concluding that the tenure has expired. I must also say clearly that the Umuahia meeting, which produced the Caretaker Committee, was also against the Labour Party constitution.

“It is only the National Chairman and Secretary of a political party who have the power to convene any NEC meeting of any sort. Let me state clearly that we are going to appeal that decision.

“Today’s decision of the Appeal Court is not acceptable to us, and we reject it in its entirety. We have put our legal team together, and we are going to file an appeal and move to the Supreme Court.”

The ruling marks a major setback for Abure’s faction, as a series of legal and political developments have tilted recognition in favour of Usman’s camp.

The crisis reached a decisive turning point two months ago when the Independent National Electoral Commission formally recognised the Usman-led National Caretaker Committee as the authentic leadership of the party, acting on the directive of the Federal High Court.

The commission’s move followed weeks of intense internal wrangling, parallel leadership claims and protracted court battles that have dogged the party since the 2023 general elections.

As part of the changes, INEC updated its records, replacing Abure’s name with that of Usman as Acting National Chairman on its official platform.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending