Connect with us

Sports

False, misrepresented, Ideye disowns report on jailing broke footballers

Published

on

A former Super Eagles striker, Brown Ideye, has denied media reports suggesting he called for retired footballers who end up broke to be jailed.

The 2013 Africa Cup of Nations winner came under fire last week after a comment he made during an online debate was widely circulated by several outlets, with many accusing him of being insensitive to the plight of former Nigerian players.

In a statement released on Sunday, Ideye described the reports as false and a misrepresentation of his position.

“Let me be clear: These statements are completely false and misrepresent my views,” he said in the statement titled Setting the Record Straight.

The former West Bromwich Albion forward said his views have always centred on support for footballers and athletes, particularly in addressing the challenges they face after retirement.

“I would never suggest punitive action towards anyone who struggles financially or otherwise.

“Instead, I advocate for focus to be on offering all necessary support, resources, trainings and mentorship programmes to help players/athletes navigate the transition from sports to life after the game,” Ideye explained.

He added that conversations about the welfare of footballers should be approached with compassion, not condemnation.

“It’s important to approach these conversations with empathy and solutions, not condemnation,” he said.

The former Super Eagles star also condemned the reports as damaging to his character and urged the media to avoid false attributions.

“This article is misleading of my person and character, and I strongly condemn it.

“I urge the public to disregard it and ask for the media to desist from false claims and publications as such stories only bring disrepute and sow seeds of discord,” he said.

See also  FULL LIST: Morocco shines at 2025 CAF Awards as Super Falcons, Nnadozie win big

On social media, Ideye further warned against hasty conclusions and misinterpretations of his comments.

“School is not a scam, try to learn how to read and understand the whole story before jumping into conclusions,” he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

The controversy began days earlier after Ideye advised active footballers to start saving money early in their careers.

His advice came in response to ex-defender Taribo West’s emotional outburst at the burial of late goalkeeper Peter Rufai, where West accused football authorities of neglecting Nigerian legends.

During the online debate, Ideye encouraged players to be financially disciplined. “Footballers, start saving for your future from day one.

“No matter how small your salary is, put something aside for your retirement,” the former footballer wrote.

He also stressed the importance of having the right support system, noting that success after retirement depends on good people and a reliable partner.

But in response to a follower, Ideye had written: “They should be jailed for life if, after they retired from playing, they can’t feed themselves.”

The 34-year-old, who recently announced his retirement from international football, is one of Nigeria’s most experienced forwards, having represented the Super Eagles at the 2010 FIFA World Cup and won the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Barcelona fined €602 over Álvarez approach

Published

on

Barcelona have been handed a €602 fine by the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) following a formal complaint from Atlético Madrid about the Catalan club’s handling of interest in striker Julián Álvarez.

As reported by Fabrizio Romano on X on Wednesday, the sanction, confirmed on Tuesday, was imposed under Article 133 of the RFEF’s disciplinary regulations for failure to comply with orders, instructions, agreements or regulatory obligations.

It is classified as a minor infringement. Spanish rules require any club seeking to negotiate with a contracted player to first notify the player’s current club in writing.

Atlético alleged Barcelona approached the Argentina international without properly fulfilling that requirement.

Álvarez, 26, remains under contract at Atlético until June 2030 after joining from Manchester City in 2024.

Interest from Barcelona intensified during the summer transfer window, fuelled in part by the player’s public comments expressing a desire to fulfil a long-held dream of playing for the Blaugrana.

No deal materialised, and Álvarez stayed in Madrid.

Atlético also lodged a parallel complaint with FIFA, which ruled it had no jurisdiction over a dispute between two Spanish clubs and left the matter with the RFEF.

The federation opened an extraordinary disciplinary file in late July and has now resolved it with the maximum fine available under the relevant light-infringement clause.

The amount has been widely described as symbolic or “irrisoria.” It closely mirrors a 2019 case in which Atlético complained about Barcelona’s approach for Antoine Griezmann and the resulting fine was just €300.

Barcelona intend to appeal. Club sources and reports from outlets including Marca and El Chiringuito indicate the decision is being challenged on principle rather than over the modest sum.

See also  FBI tags England vs Argentina highest-risk World Cup match

Barcelona maintain they informed Atlético of their interest and conducted themselves correctly throughout the process.

Meanwhile Álvarez has been working to repair relations with Atlético supporters.

He has faced some booing this season but scored the decisive goal in Saturday’s win over Deportivo La Coruña, after which he publicly apologised for the timing and manner of his earlier comments about wanting to leave.

The fine closes the formal disciplinary chapter of a tense summer saga between two La Liga rivals, though Barcelona’s planned appeal means the matter is not yet fully settled.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Sports

SEE FULL LIST: Top 10 memorable cup upsets in English football history

Published

on

English football has produced some extraordinary giant-killings, with lower-league and non-league clubs shocking established giants in the FA Cup and League Cup.

From Hereford United’s famous victory over Newcastle United to Bradford City’s stunning comeback against Chelsea, these matches have become unforgettable moments in English football history.

Here are 10 of the most memorable cup upsets as reported by BBC Sport on Wednesday

1. Hereford United 2-1 Newcastle United (FA Cup, 1972)
Hereford United produced one of the most iconic giant-killings in FA Cup history by defeating top-flight Newcastle United in a third-round replay. Ronnie Radford’s spectacular long-range equaliser sent the match into extra time before substitute Ricky George scored the winner.

2. Wrexham 2-1 Arsenal (FA Cup, 1992)
Fourth-tier Wrexham stunned reigning league champions Arsenal. After Alan Smith gave the Gunners the lead, Mickey Thomas scored a memorable free-kick before Steve Watkin netted the winner to complete a remarkable comeback.

3. Sutton United 2-1 Coventry City (FA Cup, 1989)
Non-league Sutton United shocked Coventry City, who had won the FA Cup just two years earlier. Matthew Hanlan scored the decisive goal to send Sutton into football folklore.

4. Bradford City 4-2 Chelsea (FA Cup, 2015)
Bradford City produced a stunning comeback at Stamford Bridge after falling 2-0 behind to Chelsea. Goals from Jon Stead, Filipe Morais, Andy Halliday and Mark Yeates turned the tie around and eliminated the Premier League leaders.

5. Bradford City 1-1 Arsenal (3-2 on penalties, League Cup, 2012)
Bradford City, then a fourth-tier club, knocked Arsenal out of the League Cup quarter-finals. Garry Thompson scored for Bradford before Thomas Vermaelen equalised late, but the home side prevailed in the penalty shootout.

6. Oldham Athletic 3-2 Liverpool (FA Cup, 2013)
League One side Oldham Athletic stunned Liverpool despite the visitors featuring stars such as Luis Suarez, Raheem Sterling and Daniel Sturridge. Matt Smith scored twice, while Reece Wabara added another goal to secure a famous victory.

See also  Liverpool star Mohamed Salah Wins 2025 PFA Player of the Year Award to Reach Historic Milestone

7. York City 3-0 Manchester United (League Cup, 1995)
York City stunned Manchester United with a commanding first-leg victory at Old Trafford. Paul Barnes scored twice and Tony Barras added a third. Despite United winning the return leg, York progressed 4-3 on aggregate.

8. Northampton Town 2-2 Liverpool (4-2 on penalties, League Cup, 2010)
Northampton Town pulled off a major upset at Anfield, holding Liverpool to a 2-2 draw before winning the penalty shootout. The League Two side demonstrated remarkable composure to eliminate their Premier League opponents.

9. Plymouth Argyle 1-0 Liverpool (FA Cup, 2025)
Plymouth Argyle eliminated Liverpool after Ryan Hardie’s second-half penalty secured a narrow victory. The Championship side defended resolutely to knock out a team that would go on to win the Premier League title that season.

10. Grimsby Town 2-2 Manchester United (12-11 on penalties, League Cup, 2025)
Grimsby Town delivered an astonishing upset against Manchester United. The League Two side raced into a 2-0 lead before United fought back to force penalties. After an extraordinary shootout, Grimsby eventually prevailed 12-11.

These historic results demonstrate why the FA Cup and League Cup remain so special.

Smaller clubs can overcome financial disadvantages, league positions and reputations to create unforgettable football moments.

From Hereford’s famous triumph in 1972 to more recent shocks involving Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United, English football continues to prove that no favourite is guaranteed victory.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Sports

Henry breaks silence on Yamal, Kate Scott controversies on Ballon d’Or

Published

on

A former France international, Thierry Henry, has defended his interactions with Barcelona forward Lamine Yamal and presenter Kate Scott at the Ballon d’Or ceremony, insisting that his remarks were not intended to disrespect either of them.

Henry, who co-hosted the ceremony with Scott, addressed the backlash in a video posted on his Instagram page on Tuesday, a day after the event was held in London, United Kingdom.

The former Arsenal and Barcelona striker came under criticism following two separate exchanges during the ceremony, with his question to Yamal over the Kopa Trophy and a joke involving Scott sparking debate on social media.

The incidents divided viewers, with some accusing Henry of embarrassing Yamal and disrespecting his co-presenter, while others defended the former footballer, describing the moments as harmless humour that had been taken out of context.

The first controversy followed Yamal’s third consecutive Kopa Trophy triumph, an award presented to the best young player in world football.

Despite extending his record at the ceremony, the Barcelona teenager missed out on the Ballon d’Or, the event’s most prestigious individual prize.

Henry drew attention to the distinction when he asked Yamal whether the Kopa Trophy was the award he had really wanted, a question widely interpreted as a reference to the teenager’s failure to win the main prize.

The remark triggered mixed reactions online. Critics argued that the question placed Yamal in an uncomfortable position and risked undermining his achievement, particularly given his status as one of football’s brightest young talents.

Others, however, viewed the exchange as light-hearted banter between two prominent figures in football, arguing that Henry was simply acknowledging the significance of the Ballon d’Or and the disappointment of missing out on it.

See also  Nigeria's Efe Ajagba enters boxing top 10 as Anthony Joshua drops out

The reaction prompted Henry to clarify his intentions, insisting that he was not attempting to challenge the Barcelona winger’s ego or diminish his achievement.

“I’m a big fan of Lamine Yamal. I wasn’t trying to check his ego whatsoever. If you didn’t like the joke, I understand,” Henry said.

Explaining the context of his question, the former Barcelona forward said he knew the Ballon d’Or announcement was still to come when he spoke to Yamal.

“I was simply asking if that was the trophy he really wanted because I knew the real prize was coming later,” he said.

Henry further emphasised his admiration for the teenager, describing him as one of the players he particularly enjoys watching.

“He’s actually one of those players I would pay to watch. I love him,” he added.

Henry also addressed the second controversy, which arose during the presentation of the Socrates Award, named after the late Brazilian football legend.

The exchange involved a joke about the pronunciation of Socrates’ name, with some viewers interpreting Henry’s response to Scott as dismissive or disrespectful towards his co-presenter.

The incident generated further debate, with critics questioning Henry’s conduct on stage, while others maintained that the interaction was part of a shared joke between the presenters.

Rejecting suggestions that he had disrespected Scott, Henry insisted that she was aware of the joke and had deliberately participated in the exchange.

“Kate was in on the joke with me, and you can ask Kate, by the way. She did it on purpose to say Socrates,” he said.

The former France captain expressed frustration at the accusations, stressing that he would not deliberately undermine his co-presenter.

See also  Oyo backs MTN Champs grand-finale as 3,200 athletes converge on Ibadan

“Please stop saying I disrespected Kate. I will never do that,” Henry added.

Henry acknowledged that not everyone would find the exchanges amusing but urged critics not to attribute malicious intentions to his remarks.

His response sought to clarify the circumstances surrounding both incidents, as debate continued over whether the exchanges amounted to inappropriate remarks or were simply jokes that had been misunderstood by some viewers.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending