Connect with us

News

UK contractor details luxury property, unpaid bills during Diezani trial

Published

on

A former building contractor has given detailed testimony about the renovation and management of high-value London properties linked to Nigeria’s former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Alison-Madueke, as her bribery trial continued for a fifth day at Southwark Crown Court in London.

Tony Mulcahy, a former director of Bear Rock Construction Ltd, told the court that his company carried out major refurbishment works between 2011 and 2014 on several properties allegedly used by Alison-Madueke and her family.

His evidence, supported by emails and financial records shown to the jury, described a business relationship with Nigerian businessman Kolawole Aluko that was marked by repeated payment delays.

Mulcahy said Bear Rock was engaged by Aluko to oversee extensive renovations at 39 Chester Close North, London.

Floor plans presented in court showed the installation of a residential lift, which Mulcahy said was required because the intended occupant, Alison-Madueke’s mother, had mobility challenges.

He added that the top floor was designated for the minister’s son and that the total cost of work on the property was about £2m.

He told the jury he had direct contact with Alison-Madueke, meeting her at properties to review materials such as stone samples and fabric swatches.

Text messages exchanged in early 2014 about lighting choices were also shown in court, and Mulcahy confirmed he had her personal mobile number.

A major part of Mulcahy’s evidence focused on financial difficulties caused by late or incomplete payments from Aluko.

He described a cycle of repeated requests for funds and unfulfilled promises. By December 2013, Mulcahy said his company was “on the brink,” which he explained meant “going under.”

See also  Court halts Willie Obiano’s N4bn money laundering trial indefinitely

After Aluko promised a £200,000 payment that did not arrive on time, Mulcahy said Bear Rock withheld a large Harrods delivery in storage as “leverage” to recover its money.

The £200,000 was paid shortly afterwards.

The court heard that the financial strain continued into 2014. In April of that year, Mulcahy emailed Aluko saying unpaid bills were “ruining us” and asked whether he should contact Alison-Madueke directly.

Aluko reportedly advised him to write a formal letter to the former minister, which Mulcahy said he hand-delivered to her residence at St Edmund’s Terrace. A payment of £270,000 followed about a week later through Aluko’s company, Atlantic Energy.

Mulcahy also told the court that Aluko arranged a meeting with him at One Hyde Park, one of London’s most expensive addresses. “It really annoyed me,” he said.

“Here is a man who is owing me money, and he invites me to meet him at One Hyde Park,” Mulchay added.

Emails presented to the jury suggested that Aluko’s company, Tenka Limited, managed expenses for the properties Alison-Madueke used, including staff salaries, utilities and maintenance. One internal email from May 2013 instructed staff to replace references to “HM” (Honourable Minister) with “Clients” in account records.

Mulcahy said he later tried to resolve the mounting debts through Donald Amamgbo, introduced as a lawyer. Despite several meetings, Bear Rock Construction eventually entered voluntary liquidation.

Alison-Madueke, is standing trial alongside oil executive Olatimbo Ayinde and her brother, Doye Agama, on five counts linked to alleged bribery. All three defendants have pleaded not guilty.

Prosecuting counsel, Alexandra Healy, told the jury that Alison Madueke “lived a life of luxury in London,” adding that this lifestyle was allegedly supported by business figures seeking influence over Nigeria’s oil sector.

See also  Customs seek legislative overhaul of waivers, Customs Act provisions

She said the alleged bribes were not given as cash, but as luxury goods and access to expensive properties.

Defence counsel has argued that Alison-Madueke had no direct power over the award of oil contracts and acted only as a “rubber stamp” for decisions made by other agencies.

Prosecutors further allege that the property renovations, along with luxury shopping and chauffeur services, amounted to bribes to Alison-Madueke from individuals whose companies benefited from oil sector contracts while she was in office.

The defence has rejected this claim, arguing that Alison-Madueke’s use of properties and goods paid for by associates formed part of lawful arrangements. They also say delays in the investigation have harmed their case because key financial records are no longer available.

In earlier hearings, prosecutors told the court that Alison-Madueke allegedly spent about £140,000 on luxury furniture and art in a single day.

According to prosecutors, the former minister made the purchases at a high-end antiques shop in London, where she bought bespoke lighting, premium furniture and decorative artworks.

The court was told that the items were allegedly paid for through intermediaries, not directly by Alison-Madueke.

Mulcahy is expected to continue his testimony when the trial resumes.

Meanwhile, supporters from the Ijaw community in Nigeria filled the public gallery of the London Court to follow the trial and show support to the former minister.

The Ijaw National Congress has also declared full solidarity for Alison-Madueke, describing her as “our daughter” and expressing concern over the prolonged nature of her legal ordeal, which has lasted for more than a decade.

See also  Police tear-gas elderly pensioners, Falana demands justice

Speaking for the Ijaw people, INC President Prof. Benjamin Okaba said the group was moved not only by her situation but also by wider grievances over oil production, management and underdevelopment in the Niger Delta.

Okaba said the Niger Delta suffers a troubling paradox in which communities that produce Nigeria’s oil wealth remain poor and underdeveloped. He warned that unless the structural problems in the oil industry and its management are addressed, peace and sustainable development in the South-South region will remain difficult to achieve.

On Alison-Madueke’s case, Okaba stressed that she remains an integral part of the Ijaw nation and enjoys the full backing of her people. He said the INC’s public intervention was meant to show that she is not alone and to draw attention to the human dimension of her prolonged legal struggle, which continues to worry the Ijaw community.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  Trailer kills Kogi varsity lecturer

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  Olubadan urges vigilance in Yoruba land over insecurity

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  Police tear-gas elderly pensioners, Falana demands justice

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  Tinubu brokers peace as Fubara, Wike exit Villa together

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending