Connect with us

News

Presidential panels rack up N13bn bill

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima have inaugurated at least 46 committees since assuming office in May 2023, with budget allocations and documented spending on these panels crossing N13bn in less than three years.

Analysis of budget documents from 2023 to 2026 and government payment data obtained from GovSpend, a public finance transparency platform, shows that N12.99bn has been allocated for the running of long-standing presidential committees, while at least N105.97m in traceable disbursements have been made to individuals and companies servicing specific ad hoc panels.

The N13.1bn represents approximately 62 per cent of the N21.17bn spent over seven years between 2018 and 2025 under the previous administration, according to an analysis by The PUNCH.

For the period under review, committee-related spending was N4.37bn per year, significantly higher than the N3bn annual average recorded between 2018 and 2022 under the previous administration.

The data showed that most of the Tinubu-era committees were special-purpose or ad hoc committees set up to address specific policy challenges with defined lifespans.

The rest are long-standing statutory panels with permanent secretariats that receive annual budget allocations.

Budget documents show consistent annual allocations for these long-standing presidential committees under the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.

In 2023, the Presidency allocated N3.73bn for these panels, covering political officers and standing committees, the Presidential Advisory Committee, the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reforms, the Presidential Advisory Committee on the Prerogative of Mercy, the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council, the Presidential Standing Committee on Private Jetties, and the Presidential Standing Committee on Inventions and Innovations.

In 2024, total allocations amounted to N2.96bn.

The breakdown included N2.58bn for Political Officers and Standing Committees, N50m for the Presidential Standing Committee on Private Jetties, N89.29m for the Standing Committee on Inventions and Innovations, N10.73m for the Presidential Advisory Committee, N221.3m for the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reforms, and N9.8m for the Advisory Committee on the Prerogative of Mercy.

See also  PHOTOS - Tinubu begins 10-day vacation, departs Abuja for Europe

The 2025 appropriation rose to N3.24bn, with the Presidential Technical Committee on Land Reforms alone drawing N478.45m, more than double its 2024 allocation.

Other line items included N2.58bn for Political Officers and Standing Committees, N65m for the Standing Committee on Private Jetties, N89.29m for Inventions and Innovations, N15.38m for the Presidential Advisory Committee, and N8m for the Prerogative of Mercy committee.

In 2026, the allocation stood at N3.06bn, comprising N2.58bn for Political Officers and Standing Committees, N418m for the Land Reforms committee, N45.5m for Private Jetties, and N15.37m for the Presidential Advisory Committee.

Aside from the budget allocations, GovSpend data reveals six specific payments made for the operations of ad hoc presidential committees between May 2023 and December 2025, totalling N105.97m.

 

 

The earliest entries, both dated May 31, 2023, weeks after the President’s inauguration, revealed payments of N46.64m to Shale Atlantic Intercontinental Services Limited and N21.72m to Good News Creative Ideas Limited, both described as consultant fees for the Presidential Committee on Salaries reviewing the 2014 and 2012 white paper reports.

On December 26, 2023, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation disbursed N5.02m to a project accountant for the purchase of toners, office consumables, and photocopying services to enable the Presidential Committee on Trade Malpractices to carry out its mandate.

Four days later, on December 30, 2023, the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure paid N19m to Muhammed Salisu as honorarium for members of the Presidential Committee on the Transfer of Technology.

The Federal Ministry of Justice paid N7.52m to Charvid Digital Printing Press Limited on March 15, 2024, for the printing of reports of an unnamed presidential committee, following approval by the SGF on February 26, 2024.

On December 31, 2025, a payment of N6.07m was made to Francis Emmanuel Ukpong as project accountant to the Presidential Committee on Trade Malpractices for administrative and operational costs.

See also  Terrorists release six more abducted ECWA worshipers in Kogi after ransom payment

However, the figures represent only what is traceable through the government’s payment infrastructure.

Since taking the oath of office on May 29, 2023, Tinubu and Shettima have turned to committees as a default governance mechanism across virtually every major policy challenge.

On June 19, 2023, barely three weeks in office, the President constituted a steering committee to address organised labour’s demands following the abrupt removal of petrol subsidies.

The committee was mandated to produce a workable framework within eight weeks.

On July 7, 2023, the President established the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, appointing former PwC partner Taiwo Oyedele as chairman. The committee was inaugurated in August.

In the same month, the Federal Government created the Presidential Steering Committee on Palliatives to forestall a looming nationwide labour crisis.

On September 14, 2023, Tinubu established the Presidential Committee on Implementation of Livestock Reforms, which eventually led to the creation of a new Ministry of Livestock Development.

On October 10, 2023, he set up the Presidential Committee on Flood Mitigation, Adaptation, Preparedness and Response, directing immediate action to mitigate nationwide flooding. Then-Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello chaired the committee, which submitted a roadmap on November 23.

Six days later, the Federal Executive Council, chaired by the President, created the Presidential Council on Industrial Revitalisation Roadmap, with Tinubu himself as chairperson.

 

 

On November 1, 2023, following a meeting of the Nigeria Police Council, the President established a special committee to assess constitutional shortcomings and enhance coordination and technology resources for the police.

A week later, he inaugurated the National Coordination Committee on Civil Registration and Vital Statistics System alongside the National Geospatial Data Repository.

On November 10, 2023, Vice President Shettima constituted an ad hoc committee to harmonise Nigeria’s agenda at the COP28 Climate Change Conference in the United Arab Emirates.

Ten days later, Shettima established a multi-sectoral committee to drive the Federal Government’s Human Capital Development programme, which was inaugurated in May 2024.

On December 21, 2023, the National Economic Council, chaired by the Vice President, created two committees on Economic Affairs and Crude Oil Theft and Management, headed by Kwara State Governor, AbdulRahman AbdulRazak and Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, respectively.

See also  Obi, Kwankwaso join NDC, demand litigation-free politics ahead of 2027

In 2024, the administration created at least 25 additional committees covering sectors including steel development, school feeding, social investment programmes, explosives regulation, minimum wage negotiations, emergency food intervention, farmer-herder clashes, state police, agricultural credit, flood prevention, economic coordination, the Oronsaye report, consumer credit, youth development, ambassadorial nominations, the National Single Window Project, CNG adoption, cholera response, sanitation campaigns, poliovirus eradication, dam integrity, minors’ detention, and electricity reform.

In 2025, the pace continued with the creation of committees on economic and financial inclusion on February 10, digital public infrastructure in May, the Museum of West African Art dispute in November, and APC conflict resolution ahead of the 2027 elections in December.

The Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms produced a comprehensive overhaul of Nigeria’s tax architecture that resulted in four Tax Reform Acts signed into law in 2025.

The Tripartite Committee on the National Minimum Wage delivered the new wage framework eventually adopted.

The committee on state police produced the framework that opened legislative action on the subject.

However, critics argue that the committee habit has become a costly form of political patronage.

“I think it is all about political patronage because none of the committees has led to anything significant,” Deji Adeyanju, a sociopolitical activist and former leader of the Concerned Nigerians Advocacy Group, told The PUNCH in an interview.

He said, “There’s always this policy flip-flop. That is money down the drain in several committees like that.”

The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, had not responded to queries on the matter as of press time.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Alleged coup: Families of detained officers protest at N’Assembly

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  ADC gives reasons why Tinubu should be scared ahead of 2027

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  SEE FULL LIST: IG deploys new AIGs, CPs in major police re-organisation

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Police yet to receive court order on tinted-glass permits – FPRO

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Daniel, Amosun, Rochas crash, Abiodun, Uzodimma, Bello win APC senate primaries; read details

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  PHOTOS - Tinubu begins 10-day vacation, departs Abuja for Europe

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Disu declares total war on police corruption, impunity

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Collapsed Lagos building occupants ignored distress signs – Residents

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending