Connect with us

News

Electoral Act 2026: Tinubu defends assent, opposition raises hell

Published

on

Opposition parties and civil society organisations have condemned President Bola Tinubu’s assent to the Electoral Act 2026 (Amendment), describing the move as a setback to Nigeria’s democratic progress and a legalisation of electoral manipulation ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The Peoples Democratic Party, on Wednesday, alleged that the ruling All Progressives Congress’s fear of losing the upcoming elections drove what is called the rushed approval of the contentious legislation, which the party described as a threat to the country’s democratic process.

President Tinubu signed the Electoral Act 2026 (Amendment) into law around 5pm on Wednesday at the Aso Rock Presidential Villa, Abuja, with senior National Assembly officials in attendance.

It came barely 24 hours after the bill was passed by both chambers of the National Assembly.

During the ceremony, Tinubu raised concerns about Nigeria’s current broadband infrastructure and technical capacity to handle real-time electronic transmission of election results, even as he signed the Electoral Act 2026 (Amendment) into law.

But in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, the PDP called the development “a dark day for democracy.”

He stated, “The hurried grant of presidential assent to the contentious bill, as passed by both chambers of the National Assembly, despite widespread opposition from Nigerians, confirms that this was a well-choreographed drama by the APC.

“The party’s fear of inevitable defeat in a free and fair election is palpable, and they can no longer conceal it. This is indeed a sad day for democracy.

“The Nigerian people have been dealt a bad hand, one that existentially threatens democratic governance. The President has demonstrated an inability to rise above partisanship in the art of governance.”

The bill, which was approved by the National Assembly on Tuesday, has generated significant debate, especially over provisions for real-time electronic transmission of election results, a key demand by opposition parties, civil society groups, and election observers following widespread allegations of result manipulation during the 2023 general elections.

The signing occurred days after the Independent National Electoral Commission released the timetable for the 2027 general elections, intensifying concerns among opposition stakeholders that the amendment was designed to favour the ruling party.

The Executive Director of YIAGA Africa, Samson Itodo, described the bill as “a step backward rather than a reform.”

He said, “First, this bill that was passed, it is an absolute missed opportunity for transformative electoral reforms because it fails to address critical gaps. It signals a regression.

“So, it is a reform in name and a regression in substance. I wish that the President had rejected the bill and asked the legislators to go and fix some aspects of the bill.”

 

 

He also criticised provisions related to INEC’s independence and electronic transmission of results, saying, “When you look at electronic transmission of results, the provision adopted by the National Assembly is completely against what citizens demanded because what they have done is they have made the process more vulnerable to manipulation.

“So, I say that this particular bill signals a regression in substance. And we cannot call these reforms.”

Meanwhile, the Country Director of Accountability Lab, Friday Odeh, described the amendments as a potential threat to election integrity.

Odeh stated, “There is a huge danger of rigging. We know there has been progress made, but again, for me, it looks like a huge reversal of the progress that has been made. And this is legalising rigging in a very formal way.”

However, the Executive Director of the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, Auwal Musa, offered a more measured perspective, acknowledging that while the law was not perfect, it provided a framework for future improvement.

“Well, as it is now, since the National Assembly and the President did not yield to the call by Nigerians to ensure that we have electoral law that is acceptable by us, improve the electoral transparency and boost confidence of Nigerians to even participate in the election, I think whatever it is, we just have to manage with what we have now.

“We just have to accept this law and continue to advocate for an improved electoral law in Nigeria,” Musa explained.

Opposition kicks

The Labour Party caucus in the House of Representatives also condemned what it called the hurried assent granted to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 by President Tinubu.

The plenary of the House was on Tuesday turned into a rowdy session over the bill as opposition lawmakers teamed up against their All Progressives Congress counterparts in demanding, among others, the electronic transmission of election results without a proviso.

The controversy had intensified following the release of the timetable for the 2027 general elections by the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Last week protests rocked the National Assembly complex, with civil society organisations and opposition figures demanding that the law mandate live electronic transmission of results from polling units directly to the commission’s central server.

See also  Group lauds Nwoko’s call for Anioma State creation

They argued that such a provision would reduce manipulation and enhance transparency.

However, members of the ruling All Progressives Congress and other stakeholders expressed reservations about the technical feasibility of real-time transmission in areas with limited telecommunications infrastructure, advocating a phased or hybrid approach that would allow manual collation where electronic systems fail.

 

 

Despite an overwhelming rejection of the altered version, which recognised both electronic transmission and manual transmission in the event of the failure of technology, the APC lawmakers voted in the majority, forcing the opposition to stage a walkout.

Reacting to President Tinubu’s assent to the legislation, leader of the caucus, Mr Afam Ogene, said he wondered why the development took place at the speed of light.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the Anambra lawmaker said, “It is quite interesting that, even before the ink with which the parliament crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s on the clean copies of the bill dried up, the President has gleefully put his imprimatur on the bill, leaving Nigerians to wonder if, indeed, the executive had ample time to look through the document.”

He added, “Gone with the signing are the genuine concerns of apprehensive Nigerians regarding what the new Act portends to the integrity of the country’s future elections.

“In fact, Nigerians and indeed the world must now begin to see the clear difference between campaign promises and actual motives of political players.

“While it is convenient outside the confines of power to oppose incremental increase in the price of petroleum products, it is convenient to pronounce ‘subsidy gone’ when they have the opportunity.”

The lawmaker said while it is right to advocate electronic voting in 2013, it has become obtuse, 13 years after, to canvass a fragment of it: electronic transmission of results.

He explained, “While it was convenient to ask a sitting administration to quit, on account of an alleged inability to halt the spread of insecurity, today, under their watch and allure of office, insecurity of multivarious form have become an insistent by-word.

“For emphasis, on January 13, 2013, the National Publicity Secretary of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria, Lai Mohammed, had in a statement said, ‘We assure INEC of our full support towards using electronic voting in 2015. We also appeal to all other political parties, civil society organisations and indeed all Nigerians to join us in pushing for a system that will eliminate the role of thugs and sideline vote thieves during our elections, in addition to making our elections free, fair and credible.’

“Today, 13 years afterward, neither Mohammed, who moved on to become Nigeria’s Minister of Information and Culture for eight years, and his principal, who is now our country’s current leader, see anything worthy in electronic transmission of results, much more electronic voting.

“Now that they have had their way, we call upon Nigerians not to despair. On the contrary, the battle for our country’s redemption has only just begun.”

He pledged the readiness of the LP House of Representatives caucus to mobilise Nigerians to reject any compromise of the electoral system.

“As an opposition bloc, we certainly have our job cut out: the mobilisation of fellow Nigerians to reject, at the polls, those who specialise in asking them to do only as they say, instead of living by their own creed,” he added.

CUPP slams Tinubu

 

 

The Coalition of United Political Parties also criticised the President and the National Assembly for undermining the will of Nigerians by amending the Electoral Act to allow manual transmission of election results, despite Nigerians demand for mandatory electronic transmission.

CUPP National Secretary, Peter Ameh in an exclusive interview with The PUNCH described the move as a blatant disregard for the aspirations of citizens who hope to vote out the current leadership in 2027.

He stated, “President has been collaborating with the National Assembly all along to undermine the wishes and aspirations of our citizens.

“The effort for a mandatory electronic transmission of election results had already been approved, but they were attempting, using their majority, to brazenly act in disregard of the people.

“Democracy is not built around elective officials; it is built around the citizens.”

Ameh said after prior consultation with all zones, it was agreed that electronic transmission should be mandatory.

Yet, resources were spent on charades, traveling from one zone to another, pretending to act transparently and truthfully for the benefit of the election, only to reverse provisions that would have strengthened the electoral process, he stated.

“The President quickly signed the Electoral Act into law after working with the National Assembly to include manual transmission, against the demand of many Nigerians, instead of mandating only electronic transmission of results,” he asserted.

See also  Christian Genocide: Detail of meeting between US War Secretary, Hegseth, Nigerian delegation emerges

According to Ameh, the new mandate for electronic and real-time transmission of results will empower more Nigerians and strengthen the electoral process against rigging, and they will be voted out in 2027.

“However, they colluded against the Nigerian people by adding a manual transmission clause for their convenience and hurriedly signing it into law, because they fear credible elections.

“This is totally disheartening and disappointing. I am also disappointed with the opposition,” he lamented, adding that they should not rely solely on breakthroughs or isolated issues but must collaborate and develop a stronger, more coherent strateg.

“Leadership requires putting pressure on the National Assembly, which has surrounded itself with the executive and consistently underperformed.

“They are clearly afraid of elections, which makes the times ahead very challenging,” he argued.

Tinubu questions broadband

At the signing ceremony, President Tinubu raised concerns about Nigeria’s current broadband infrastructure and technical capacity to handle real-time electronic transmission of election results.

“Maybe Nigeria should question our broadband capability. How technically are we today? How technically will we be tomorrow to answer the call of either real-time or not,” the President said, addressing principal officers of the National Assembly who had transmitted the bill to him for assent.

The President emphasised that the credibility of elections depends more on proper human management and oversight than on electronic systems, noting that voters still cast their ballots manually, and results are still counted and sorted manually at polling units.

“No matter how good a system is, it’s managed by the people, promoted by the people, and result is finalised by the people.

“In fact, for final results, you are not going to be talking to the computer.

“You are going to be talking to human beings who announce the results,” he said.

‘Every vote counts’

Senate President Godswill Akpabio, speaking earlier to journalists, said the amended Act addressed core concerns raised by Nigerians and introduces provisions that will make future elections more transparent.

He said the new piece of legislation eliminates the perennial problem of result manipulation between polling units and collation centres.

Speaking to journalists shortly after the signing ceremony, Akpabio said the new law addresses the core concerns raised by Nigerians over the integrity of the electoral process and introduces provisions that will make future elections more transparent and secure.

“At the end, Nigerians will benefit a lot from future elections. Every vote will now count,” the Senate President said.

He noted that the amendment represents the first time since independence in 1960 that Nigeria’s electoral laws will recognise electronic transmission of results.

Akpabio explained that the amended Act mandates the electronic transmission of polling unit results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal, a key demand by civil society organisations, opposition parties, and election observers following widespread allegations of result manipulation during the 2023 general elections.

However, he said the law also took into account areas with poor telecommunications infrastructure, ensuring that the primary source of results remains the EC8A forms signed by presiding officers, party agents, and security personnel at polling units.

“We took cognisance of areas where there may not be any network, where they may not be communication capacities and availability.

“We said, since the polling unit result comes in from EC8A, which is signed by the presiding officer, signed by the agents, and signed in the presence of security agents, copies are given to all.

“Then we can use that as the primary source of collation at that unit,” he said.

Akpabio added, “And then, of course, we transmit it. Even if there is no network at that time, once we step out of there, maybe towards the ward centre or the local government centre, it will drop into the iREV and people will still be able to view.”

The Senate President said the implication is that Nigerians will now be able to compare results uploaded to the portal with what is eventually collated at ward, local government, and state levels, making it impossible for results to be tampered with after leaving polling units.

“The implication of that is that if what is eventually collated at the next centre is different from what is in the iREV, Nigerians will be able to compare whether the election result had been tampered with.

“And for us, that had always been the problem in the country, that once election results leave a polling unit, they will be tampered with or mutilated. That has been eliminated today,” he said.

The Senate President dismissed suggestions that the National Assembly had bowed to political pressure, insisting that the final provisions of the amendment were the product of thorough consultations and deliberations in plenary sessions of both chambers.

See also  FCT doctors’ strike continues despite partial payment of arrears

“We are satisfied that we have met the aspiration of Nigerians, not those who are politically motivated,” he said, adding that the Senate had even sacrificed its holiday break to conclude work on the amendment.

Akpabio also highlighted other provisions in the new law, including the introduction of direct primaries for political parties, which will allow party members to vote directly for candidates of their choice rather than relying on delegate selection.

“Participatory democracy, more inclusiveness. Members of different political parties are now allowed to do direct primaries.

“That means you can choose the person you want. Delegate selection, of course, one person can write the list and then just submit, but this time around, the members who are in the political party will stand up and vote for their candidates and the candidates of their choices,” he said.

The Senate President said the amendment also addresses scenarios where election winners are disqualified by courts, noting that instead of declaring the runner-up as winner, the law now mandates fresh elections to ensure that Nigerians truly elect their leaders.

“We don’t want a situation where in an election, you have five people contesting, one person scores out of 300,000 votes, one person scores 290,000, and then, for one reason or the other, he’s disqualified by the court, and then the person who scored 1,000, who is not popularly elected, will now be declared a winner.

“All those things are eliminated. We have now recommended that where such a case happens, then they should call for another election,” he said.

He noted that the same principle now applies to governorship elections, where candidates who fail to meet the constitutional requirement of scoring 25 per cent of votes in at least two-thirds of local government areas cannot be declared winners even if they scored the second-highest votes.

Speaker of the House of Representatives, Abbas Tajudeen, who also addressed journalists, drew attention to the reduction of the election notice period from 360 days to 300 days.

“This will inadvertently translate to holding the presidential and National Assembly elections in January 2027, and that will technically avoid conducting elections during the month of Ramadan of 2027.

“I think this is another piece of ingenuity that the National Assembly has introduced to avoid voter apathy in the next general election,” the Speaker said.

The Electoral Act 2026 (Amendment) comes days after INEC released the timetable for the 2027 general elections.

The 2022 Electoral Act had been criticised following the failure of INEC’s Result Viewing Portal on the day of the 2023 elections, an incident that triggered allegations of rigging.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

 

 

Tinubu gave ascent to the Electoral Act 2026 (Amendment) at a signing ceremony at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, around 05:00pm, with principal officers of the National Assembly in attendance, our correspondent observed.

The 2027 general elections are scheduled to hold on February 20 for Presidential and National Assembly elections and March 6 for Governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections.

Wike commends Tinubu

Meanwhile, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, commended President Bola Tinubu for promptly signing the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 into law, describing the move as a strong commitment to strengthening Nigeria’s democratic process.

In a statement issued on Wednesday by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, the minister praised the President’s swift assent to the bill, noting that it demonstrates a resolve to make elections more credible.

Wike said the passage of the amended Electoral Act by the National Assembly and the President’s immediate approval had effectively put an end to what he described as “unnecessary protests” by individuals preparing excuses for electoral defeat.

“Democracy has always been a work-in-progress, as it has continuously evolved,” Wike said, adding that “by always looking into the Electoral Act with a view to strengthening our democratic process, it is sure that we will keep getting it better.”

 

 

The minister congratulated both the President and members of the National Assembly for their roles in the legislative process.

“I therefore congratulate Mr President and the National Assembly members for playing their roles in this dispensation to make democracy stronger,” he said.

Wike applauded President Tinubu for the speed with which he signed the bill into law.

“Particularly, I commend the President for not keeping Nigerians waiting for more than 24 hours before signing the Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2026 into law,” he said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Belgian parliament to legislate to allow police to enter homes to facilitate undocumented migrant removals

Published

on

Belgian police will soon be able, in conjunction with the Immigration Office (DVZ), to enter the homes of undocumented migrants who pose a threat to public order or national security. This is set out in a bill drafted by the Belgian Asylum and Migration Minister, Anneleen Van Bossuyt (Flemish nationalist N-VA), and Justice Minister Annelies Verlinden (Flemish Christian democrat CD&V), which has now been approved by the House Home Affairs Committee. The proposal still needs to be OKed during a plenary session of the lower house of the Belgian parliament.

Home searches like these are controversial. The aim is to make it easier to deport people residing here illegally and who persistently refuse to cooperate with efforts to facilitate their return.

The new law will make this possible. Following entry into the home, the police may place the person in question – that is, the individual who poses a threat to public order or national security – under administrative detention. However, prior authorisation from an investigating judge is required to enter the home.

Speaking to press agency Belga, Minister Van Bossuyt referred to this as “an historic breakthrough” and had previously said that this “is the final piece in a firm but humane return policy”.

“This is not a witch-hunt against people who have international protection or are simply in the country illegally (..) The law sets out clear conditions, and a search of a home can only take place with the authorisation of an investigating judge.”

(Overly) broad definitions

The bill did, however, attract a great deal of comment and was extensively discussed in parliament.

See also  FG targets mid-August for outstanding wage award payments

The opposition, the federal police, investigating judges and lawyers alike were highly critical. They believe that the exact meaning of ‘a threat to public order or national security’ has not been defined clearly enough.

“It will be up to the investigating judge to determine whether someone poses a threat to public order or national security,” says Van Bossuyt. “The judge will independently assess whether that person poses such a threat. That is a crucial test.”

Minister Van Bossuyt finds the debate strange: “The concepts of public order and national security feature in many parts of our legislation. Nowhere is a specific list provided of what they entail.” What is more, according to Van Bossuyt, the Council of State, which vets Belgian draft legislation, has explicitly stated that it is not desirable to define these concepts, as they may evolve over time.

“When the Justice Minister drafts new legislation, she isn’t asked how judges should apply that law, is she?” Van Bossuyt notes.

Van Bossuyt has also tabled an amendment to her own bill: “We have given investigating judges more time to reach a decision, from 5 days to 7.”

She emphasises that their role is not merely reduced to that of a ‘rubber-stamp judge’: “The investigating judge will absolutely not be a rubber-stamp judge, precisely because they play such a crucial role in assessing whether someone poses a threat or not. They will have access to the full case file.”

What about minors?

Another point of criticism concerns the rights of minors. According to critics, these are not sufficiently safeguarded. Government party Les Engagés (Francophone centrist) was only prepared to vote for the bill if greater protection for minors was provided.

See also  CDS eyes foreign partnership to crush insurgency

“When authorising a search of a home, the investigating judge must determine all the conditions under which that search may take place,” explains Van Bossuyt. “If, for example, children are present, the investigating judge can stipulate that the search must take place during school hours. In that case, the likelihood of children being present is very low.”

The investigating judge may also, for example, require a psychologist to be present during the search, says Van Bossuyt. “So, the possible presence of minors has certainly been taken into account.”

The minister also points to the responsibility of the person who poses a threat to public order or national security: “It is that person who is making life difficult for those children,” says the minister.

Desperately needed, according to Van Bossuyt

Government party, Les Engagés, did not secure all the amendments it had requested, so MP Xavier Dubois boycotted the second reading. However, his group leader, Aurore Tourneur, did defend the amendments in the House Home Affairs Committee.

This enabled the majority to approve the bill after all, with the support of the Flemish liberal opposition party Anders. Although they, too, called for further amendments.

The left-wing opposition parties voted against. The far-right Vlaams Belang abstained. According to MP Francesca Van Belleghem, the law has been “so watered down by coalition negotiations that it will have virtually no effect in practice”.

‘This was a sensitive bill for several government parties: that’s no secret. In practice, there was an absolute need for this,’ concludes Van Bossuyt.

The bill must now be put to a vote during a plenary session, where the law can be definitively approved.

See also  Missing Ebonyi engineers’ families demand fresh probe

Speaking to Belga, the minister warned local authorities that have already announced they will not permit home visits, such as Leuven. “Be fully aware of what that choice means. If you refuse to implement this law and things go wrong, do not point the finger at the federal government afterwards. Because then you will be jeopardising the safety of your own residents” she said.

Source: VRT.BE

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Trump rules out new Iran attack before US midterm elections

Published

on

President Donald Trump ruled out Thursday attacking Iran before the US midterms on November 3, saying Washington was holding “productive discussions” with Tehran.

Trump’s announcement on his Truth Social platform followed a surge in oil prices driven by media reports suggesting potential new US strikes prior to the elections.

“I want to make it clear to everybody that, while Iran is in very bad condition, both economically and militarily, and while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect…we will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections,” he wrote.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he added.

The Atlantic magazine reported on Wednesday that the White House had asked the Pentagon to develop options to strike Iranian targets that could be used before the midterms.

The New York Times said Thursday the plans were being developed despite Trump’s “ambivalence.”

The surge in crude oil prices has also been fueled by persistent tensions in the Strait of Hormuz — a strategic chokepoint for the global oil trade — as well as hostilities between Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis and Saudi Arabia.

Polls suggest American voters are strongly dissatisfied with fuel prices, which have soared since US-Israeli strikes against Iran on February 28 triggered the conflict.

Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, rallied to as high as $105.88 a barrel on Thursday before retreating to $104.28.

– Putin vows to help –

Russian President Vladimir Putin promised Thursday to “do everything” to help end the Middle East war when he met Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian for talks ahead of a regional summit, Russian media reported.

See also  Christian Genocide: Detail of meeting between US War Secretary, Hegseth, Nigerian delegation emerges

“We are ready to do everything that is in our power to contribute to the settlement of this situation,” Putin said after arriving in Turkmenistan for a summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) that starts Friday in the Caspian Sea resort of Avaza.

He added that Iran had made “real efforts to end the war,” according to Russian news agencies.

Russia and Iran have reinforced diplomatic and military links since Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine in February 2022, becoming increasingly reliant on each other.

Trump has repeatedly insisted in recent weeks that the United States has effectively won the Iran war, despite ongoing unrest and a recent security threat that forced the withdrawal of American bombers from a base in England.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted Tehran was “engaged in dialogue, but every time we negotiate with the United States, they attack again”, Iranian state media quoted him as saying at the talks with Putin.

Pezeshkian said the Islamic republic wanted to see a “final framework” to end the war.

But he accused the United States of “trying to impose its policies and views on all countries”.

“If the United States insists on pursuing a unilateral approach, a resolution will not be possible,” he said, according to state media.

– Approaching election –

The midterm elections will shape the final two years of Trump’s presidential term as his Republican Party risks losing its current grip on Congress.

Although Trump is not on the ballot, he is holding numerous rallies in an attempt to limit the damage or even turn the political tide.

See also  CDS eyes foreign partnership to crush insurgency

Trump has warned he faces a possible third impeachment if Democrats retake the House of Representatives, and the White House is preparing for a slew of investigations into corruption and abuse of power.

The US president also sought to calm a furor on Thursday over his comments at a rally earlier this week that Iran could “take out” the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego.

The 80-year-old blamed the “fake and artificial news” for misinterpreting the remarks, which Democrats pounced on.

“In actuality, what I was talking about was that a temporary increase in the price of Gasoline is a small price to pay for Iran not having a Nuclear Weapon and, if you want to see a big price, can you imagine what it would be like if they bombed San Diego and/or Los Angeles?” Trump said on Truth Social.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

INEC displays voter register, begins PVC distribution ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission has commenced the display of the preliminary register of voters and distribution of Permanent Voter Cards across states as part of preparations for the 2027 general elections.

The seven-day exercise, which begins on Friday and runs through October 15, will allow registered voters to verify their details, raise claims and objections, and collect PVCs from the first phase of the Continuous Voter Registration conducted between August and December 2025.

In Plateau and Sokoto states, the respective Resident Electoral Commissioners announced that the exercise would take place at Registration Area centres, with PVC collection continuing at INEC offices at the local government level after the display period.

In a statement by the Plateau REC, Prof. Sam Egwu, made available to journalists in Jos on Thursday, the commission said the exercise was pursuant to Section 19(1) of the Electoral Act 2026, which mandates it to display the voter register not less than 90 days before the general elections.

He said, “The Independent National Electoral Commission, Plateau State, wishes to inform the good people of Plateau State that the commission will commence display of the Preliminary Register of Voters, attend to the hearing of claims and objections as well as collection of Permanent Voters Cards (PVCs) simultaneously in all the 207 Registration Areas in the state, from the 9th to 15th of October 2026 (7 days and weekends inclusive). Time is 9 am -3 pm daily.”

The statement asked all registered voters to take advantage of the opportunity to check their details.

See also  Ex-AGF Malami, Others To Know Fate On Bail Application January 7

“All registered voters are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity to carefully check information they provided, such as their names, photographs, date of birth, polling units and other relevant registration details to make necessary claims and objections within this stipulated period as an accurate voter register is important for free and credible elections,” the REC said.

He further disclosed that PVCs from the first phase of the CVR exercise conducted from August 18, 2025 to December 10, 2025, would be available for collection during the exercise.

In Sokoto, the REC, Umar Garba, while briefing journalists on the commission’s preparations for the 2027 general elections, said the exercise was part of INEC’s activities ahead of the 2027 elections.

Garba, who was at the Nigeria Union of Journalists Press Centre, said the commission was committed to ensuring that eligible voters were given the opportunity to verify their registration details and collect their PVCs.

“The Independent National Electoral Commission will commence the display of the preliminary register of voters for claims and objections, as well as the distribution of Permanent Voter Cards from the 9th to the 15th of October 2026,” Garba said.

He said PVCs relating to lost or damaged cards, transfers, updates and registrations conducted during the second and third phases of the CVR were not yet ready for collection.

Garba said the commission would announce when the affected PVCs became available.

He added that after the exercise at the Registration Area level ended on October 15, distribution would continue at INEC offices in the 23 local government areas of the state.

See also  Share terror intelligence with security agencies, Presidency replies Ndume

“This will enable eligible voters who could not collect their cards at the Registration Area level to do so,” he said.

On security, Garba said INEC had continued to take the advice of security agencies into consideration throughout the voter registration process.

“Throughout the registration of voters held recently, the commission took the advice of security agencies very seriously. This contributed to a safe process without any casualties,” he said.

He assured eligible voters that INEC would work to ensure that PVCs were distributed across the state.

On internally displaced persons, Garba said the commission was engaging security agencies to establish the number of IDPs in Sokoto and determine how they could participate in the 2027 elections.

“The commission is always talking with security agencies to ascertain the number of IDPs in the state. We are working to ensure that they vote once they are in official and recognised camps,” he said.

The REC also said INEC would release the total number of registered voters in Sokoto State at the appropriate time.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending