The Peoples Democratic Party candidate for Ogugu State Constituency in the Kogi State House of Assembly, Michael Idoko, has rejected the N5 million campaign signage fee imposed on assembly candidates by the state government ahead of the 2027 general elections.

He disclosed this in a statement issued in Abuja on Thursday.

Idoko described the levy as anti-democratic and anti-people, arguing that the policy could make political participation increasingly dependent on candidates’ financial capacity.

The Kogi State Government had approved N150m as the official fee payable by presidential candidates for the placement of campaign billboards, posters and other promotional materials across the state.

The government also fixed the charges at N50m for senatorial candidates, N30m for House of Representatives candidates and N5m for State House of Assembly candidates.

The Commissioner for Information and Communications, Kingsley Fanwo, disclosed the approved charges in Lokoja, the state capital, after a stakeholders’ meeting with operators in the signage and advertising sector.

The charges cover campaign billboards, posters, branded T-shirts, caps and other political promotional materials ahead of the 2027 elections and the October 2026 Local Government polls.

Reacting to the policy, Idoko said it reflected what he described as a disconnect between the government and the economic realities facing ordinary residents, as queried, “What makes a commercial billboard different from a political billboard? How exactly does a billboard win votes?”

Idoko argued that elections were won through grassroots mobilisation, credibility, service and public trust rather than the number or size of campaign billboards erected by candidates.

“History has repeatedly shown that many candidates have won elections without erecting a single billboard. Votes come from the hearts of the people, not from painted metal structures,” he said.

Idoko said the N5m demanded of assembly candidates could instead be deployed to address constituents’ needs.

“With N5m, I can pay school fees for indigent students, support widows, empower struggling youths through small businesses, provide medical assistance for vulnerable families and improve community welfare in Ogugu.

“Asking candidates to spend such money on billboards while many citizens cannot afford food, medication and transportation is morally indefensible,” he said.

He also faulted the justification that the levy was meant to generate revenue and regulate political advertising, insisting that government should not turn political participation into a source of revenue.

He warned that the charges could discourage young aspirants, women and grassroots politicians from seeking elective office, saying democracy would suffer if access to public office became largely determined by candidates’ ability to pay.

Idoko also challenged the ruling All Progressives Congress in the state to explain how the levies aligned with its claims of running a people-oriented administration.

He reaffirmed his commitment to running a grassroots campaign focused on direct engagement with voters across Ogugu State Constituency, saying public trust would remain his major campaign asset.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

The Independent National Electoral Commission has reproduced ballot papers for the Osun State governorship election to accommodate the candidate of the Social Democratic Party, Dr Olugbenga Ajala, three days to the poll.

This is as the commission is set to distribute sensitive materials for Saturday’s governorship poll to the 30 local government areas in the state today (Thursday).

The distribution is expected to be held on the premises of the Central Bank of Nigeria in Osogbo, the state capital.

The state INEC spokesperson, Musa Olurode, in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, said, “Sensitive materials will be distributed tomorrow, and journalists will be informed of the time the exercise will commence.”

Earlier, in a statement on Wednesday, signed by the National Commissioner and Chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Haruna, the commission said Ajala and his running mate, Faseke Oladipo, had been added to the ballot following a judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, delivered on July 22, 2026.

The judgment was delivered in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/344/2026, between the SDP and Ajala, on one hand, and INEC, on the other.

According to the commission, the court ordered it to “forthwith recognise, accept, upload, process and publish” the name and particulars of Ajala as the SDP governorship candidate.

INEC said, “Consequently, the ballot papers for the election, scheduled for Saturday, 15th August 2026, are being reproduced to reflect this addition, bringing to fifteen (15) the total number of political parties contesting the election.”

It added that the result sheets for the election were also being reproduced alongside the ballot papers to reflect the inclusion of the SDP candidate.

The commission assured political parties, candidates and the general public of its commitment to conducting a free, fair and credible election in Osun State.

Following his inclusion, Ajala said the party was poised for victory.

Ajala disclosed this during a telephone interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday after INEC listed the party among those fielding candidates in the poll.

Although Ajala admitted the party has limited time to canvass for votes, he, however, said despite the setback, SDP could still emerge victorious in the poll.

Asked what he was doing during the time of waiting for INEC’s listing, Ajala said, “We were in court throughout before we got judgments.

“In the next 48 hours, there is very little we can do because it is like a 100-metre race. Some of the contestants have reached 75 metres out of the 100 metres.

“We are now coming out to the starting point. You know, it will be an unfair competition. We will do our best. But let us see what the result will be before we can say decisively which step we will take.

“I am very optimistic about victory. In fact, we are joyous.”

The development brings the number of political parties contesting the election to 15.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Uncertainty has continued to trail the proposal for a single opposition presidential candidate ahead of the 2027 general election, with political parties expressing divergent positions on the proposed arrangement.

The development followed a call by the Group of 100 Nigerians led by former All Progressives Congress chieftain, Salisu Lukman, for opposition presidential candidates and political leaders to close ranks and present a common candidate against President Bola Tinubu in 2027.

The group had urged former Vice President Atiku Abubakar of the African Democratic Congress, Peter Obi of the Nigeria Democratic Congress and their respective running mates, Rotimi Amaechi and Rabiu Kwankwaso, as well as other opposition candidates, to subordinate individual interests to the broader objective of defeating the APC-led Federal Government in 2027.

The G-100 argued that a divided opposition, regardless of its numerical strength, would struggle to defeat the ruling party, making a single presidential candidacy necessary to consolidate opposition votes.

Lukman, earlier in the week, announced the convocation of an opposition summit in Abuja on August 18, signalling the group’s determination to advance the proposal and bring the various opposition tendencies to the negotiating table.

However, indications that the proposal may face difficulties have emerged from some of the parties and political movements expected to participate in the process.

In an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication to ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Mr Phrank Shaibu, came short of confirming his principal’s attendance at the proposed summit, noting that a word to that effect would be made public.

He said, “His Excellency Atiku Abubakar welcomes every genuine initiative aimed at strengthening democratic opposition and providing Nigerians with a credible alternative to the Tinubu administration.

“His attendance at the August 18 summit will, however, be communicated once his schedule and participation are finalised.”

He also lauded the G-100 initiative, saying, “His Excellency has consistently maintained that the challenges confronting Nigeria require opposition parties, leaders and citizens of goodwill to put the national interest above individual or partisan considerations. There is considerable merit in building the broadest possible democratic coalition ahead of 2027.

“What is most important is that any process towards achieving that objective must be transparent, inclusive and democratic, and ultimately produce a candidate capable of earning the confidence of Nigerians.”

On the proposal for a single opposition candidate to confront Tinubu, the ADC candidate was rather evasive, noting, however, that he’s in consultation “with political leaders and stakeholders across the opposition.”

Such engagements, he noted, “are normal and necessary at this stage. The objective is bigger than any individual: to strengthen the opposition, protect our democracy and present Nigerians with a credible alternative to an administration that has failed to meet their expectations.”

He added that “At the appropriate time, the outcome of these consultations will be made public.”

On its part, the Obidient Movement, the support base of the NDC candidate, said an invitation had been extended to Obi to attend the proposed summit but stressed that the decision ultimately rested with him.

The National Coordinator of the movement, Tanko Yunusa, disclosed this in an interview with The PUNCH.

He said, “An invitation has been sent to him. We will see whether he will attend or not. It is left for him to decide on whether to go to such a meeting.”

Yunusa, however, acknowledged the desirability of opposition cooperation, saying, “We agree that it is very good for everyone in the opposition to come together under one umbrella.”

He said he could not confirm whether Atiku had separately contacted Obi over the proposed summit.

The Labour Party, meanwhile, welcomed the principle of opposition collaboration but took a more assertive position, arguing that any coalition seeking to defeat the APC should be built around its existing structure rather than create another political platform.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Ken Asogwa, said the Labour Party appreciated “the need for broad-based collaboration among opposition forces to democratically unseat the ruling All Progressives Congress,” but maintained that its platform was already the strongest opposition vehicle for a presidential contest.

According to Asogwa, the party’s connection with the Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress gives it an organisational advantage that other political parties cannot easily replicate.

He told our correspondent, “The Labour Party is unique among all political parties because the NLC and the TUC are its institutional members,” he said.

He added that the connection gives the party access to a nationwide network of serving and retired civil servants.

“By implication, every serving and retired civil servant across the country is naturally connected to the LP family through these labour institutions,” Asogwa said.

The LP spokesman argued that the structure extended from the national level to polling units, wards, local government areas and communities, describing it as an advantage that should not be discarded in the search for a coalition arrangement.

He, therefore, called on political groups and individuals seeking to form a formidable opposition alliance to instead strengthen the LP.

“It is against this backdrop that the Labour Party respectfully calls on all individuals, groups and political movements seeking to build a formidable opposition coalition to collapse their structures into the Labour Party,” he said.

Asogwa also argued that the party already had what he described as an “energised membership base” and a credible presidential candidate capable of offering Nigerians an alternative to the APC.

“The task before the opposition is not to reinvent the wheel but to unite behind the most viable platform. That platform is the Labour Party,” he said.

The Democratic Leadership Alliance, on the other hand, adopted a more cautious position, welcoming the idea of opposition cooperation but distancing itself from any immediate commitment to a single-candidate arrangement.

The party’s Deputy National Publicity Secretary, Judith Aguenu, said the DLA appreciated the call for opposition forces to work together but disclosed that the party was not currently negotiating with the group or any political party on the adoption of a common presidential candidate.

“The Democratic Leadership Alliance appreciates the call by the G-100 and other stakeholders for opposition forces to close ranks ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“However, at this stage, the DLA is not in talks with the G-100 or any other political party or group regarding the adoption or nomination of a single presidential candidate,” Aguenu said.

According to her, the immediate priority of the DLA was to strengthen its own platform and position it as a credible alternative ahead of the election.

Aguenu, however, said the party remained open to engagement with opposition parties, political movements and civil society organisations sharing its commitment to accountable and people-oriented governance.

“For us, the conversation should go beyond merely producing a single candidate. It must be about building a credible political platform, agreeing on a clear vision for Nigeria, and presenting Nigerians with a leadership alternative they can trust,” she said.

In a separate interview with The PUNCH, the Coalition of United Political Parties commended Lukman and his colleagues for the initiative and pledged its commitment to the success of the summit.

Speaking with our correspondent, the spokesperson of CUPP, Agu Bryan, said the summit would help unite the opposition as a single force ahead of next year’s general election.

“The CUPP acknowledges and appreciates the initiative of the G-100 in convening an opposition summit aimed at fostering greater unity and strategic cooperation among opposition political forces ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“We commend their personal sacrifices, commitment to democratic consolidation and stake in the quest for accountable and good governance in Nigeria.

“CUPP has consistently advocated, from its inception, for the possibility of a single, formidable opposition presidential candidate where practicable.

“We believe that a united opposition, anchored on a credible candidacy and a coherent alternative policy platform, stands a stronger chance of providing Nigerians with a viable democratic alternative to the Tinubu-led administration.

“Accordingly, CUPP is prepared to support and work for the success of a consensus opposition candidate, should the major opposition contenders, including Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar and others, arrive at a mutually acceptable arrangement in the overriding national interest,” he said.

That said, Bryan underscored the importance of free and credible polls.

“Opposition unity must go hand-in-hand with a sustained demand for free, fair, transparent and credible elections. A credible electoral process is the foundation of legitimate governance and the essential pathway to ensuring that the will of Nigerian voters is freely expressed and respected.

“CUPP, therefore, welcomes the August 18 Abuja opposition summit with an open mind and is willing to engage with every credible initiative capable of building a more formidable, united and democratic opposition ahead of 2027,” he added.

While the G-100 believes that a common presidential candidate is essential to prevent the opposition vote from being divided, some political actors appear unwilling to surrender their existing platforms without a clear agreement on the structure, leadership and principles of any proposed coalition.

The issue of presidential candidacy is expected to be particularly contentious given the calibre of opposition figures already positioning themselves for the 2027 contest.

Atiku, Obi and Kwankwaso command distinct political constituencies, while the Labour Party and other emerging opposition platforms are seeking to consolidate their own structures ahead of the election.

The proposed August 18 summit may provide an early test of whether the various opposition tendencies can move beyond individual party interests and agree on a common political strategy.

For the G-100, the argument remains that only a united opposition can mount a serious challenge to the APC and prevent another fragmentation of votes.

For the parties involved, however, the emerging responses suggest that agreeing on who should lead such a coalition may prove considerably more difficult than agreeing on the need for opposition cooperation.

With the 2027 election still months away, opposition leaders have time to negotiate, but the divergent positions already emerging indicate that the road to a single presidential candidacy is unlikely to be straightforward.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM