Connect with us

News

FG eyes oil windfall to fund N9tn budget gap

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Tuesday asked the National Assembly to approve a N9.09tn increase in the 2026 budget.

The government plans to finance the budget increase through crude oil gains linked to the Unites States-Iran conflict and by securing new loans

The Tinubu’s request, which signals a significant adjustment to the fiscal framework for the coming year, was conveyed in a letter read on the Senate floor by the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, during plenary on Tuesday.

Tinubu explained that the proposed adjustment is intended to enhance fiscal transparency and support the effective execution of key national programmes.

The letter reads, “The proposed adjustment is aimed at strengthening fiscal transparency and ensuring the effective implementation of priority national programmes.”

According to him, the review would allow the government to properly capture existing public debt obligations within the fiscal framework.

The adjustment, Tinubu added, would also provide for a limited number of strategic priority projects while aligning the 2026 financing plan to safeguard macroeconomic stability and reduce pressure on the domestic financial market.

However, the National Assembly passed the 2026 Appropriation Bill, increasing the budget to N68.32tn from the N58.18tn initially proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

An analysis by The PUNCH shows that adding the President’s N9.09tn request to the original proposal would bring the total to about N67.3tn. This indicates that the approved figure of N68.32tn includes an additional increase of roughly N1tn beyond the executive’s request.

The upward revision, according to lawmakers, is intended to clear legacy obligations, fund key infrastructure, strengthen the judiciary, boost healthcare interventions, and support preparations for the 2027 general elections.

Presenting the report, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Solomon Adeola, said the increase was necessary to address outstanding commitments and align the budget with prevailing economic conditions.

He said the adjustment would “regularise outstanding commitments from previous fiscal years, align the budget with current economic realities and maintain macroeconomic stability.”

Tinubu had originally presented the N58.18tn proposal to the National Assembly on December 19, 2025, under the theme, “Budget of Consolidation, Renewed Resilience and Shared Prosperity,” with a focus on economic growth, security and capital projects.

However, the version approved by both chambers reflects a significant expansion in spending.

A breakdown shows that N4.799tn is allocated to statutory transfers, N15.809tn to debt servicing, N15.427tn to recurrent (non-debt) expenditure, and N32.287tn to capital projects.

The committee explained that the N9.09tn increase followed a formal request from the President to include critical expenditures omitted in the initial proposal and to prevent unresolved obligations from undermining the 2026 fiscal plan.

A major component of the adjustment is the rollover of N7.71tn in outstanding capital obligations from the 2025 budget.

Lawmakers noted that about 70 per cent of capital projects in the 2025 Appropriation Act were affected by revenue shortfalls, necessitating a carryover into 2026 to avoid abandonment and rising costs.

Beyond legacy liabilities, new provisions were introduced for strategic interventions across key sectors.

These include N478.6bn as the Federal Government’s equity contribution under the Ministry of Finance Incorporated framework to support rail projects in Lagos, Kano, Kaduna and Ogun States, as well as feasibility studies for urban rail systems in Enugu and Maiduguri and upgrades to the narrow-gauge rail network.

The committee also approved N8.96bn for feasibility studies on the Calabar–Maiduguri corridor and the Maiduguri–Sokoto superhighway under the Tinubu National Beltway Initiative.

In the health sector, an additional $344.83m, equivalent to about N482.76bn, was allocated for priority interventions under bilateral agreements, aimed at improving healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

The judiciary received increased funding, including N98.5bn for the Court of Appeal, N36.7bn for the Supreme Court and N268.54bn to restore its budget ceiling and accommodate the appointment of more judges ahead of the 2027 elections.

Lawmakers stressed that strengthening the judiciary was essential to handling election-related disputes and ensuring timely justice.

To finance the expanded budget, the committee proposed a combination of revenue measures and borrowing.

This includes a $10 per barrel increase in the oil benchmark, expected to generate about N2.592tn in additional revenue.

The committee also highlighted improved contributions from the telecommunications sector following tariff adjustments and policy reforms.

It is projected that MTN Nigeria would generate N724bn in company income tax in 2026, while Airtel Nigeria is expected to contribute N150bn, bringing total additional revenue from the sector to N874bn.

Despite these measures, lawmakers approved an increase in external borrowing by N6.163tn to bridge the financing gap, noting that the borrowing remains within manageable limits.

The report stated that the 2026 budget is designed to strengthen macroeconomic stability, improve the business environment, create jobs and reduce poverty.

It added that priority sectors include security, infrastructure, health, education and human capital development.

See also  36 Speakers back state police, final test begins

The committee recalled that the Senate had debated the general principles of the bill in December 2025 before subjecting it to detailed scrutiny, including engagements with the President’s economic team.

It said a public hearing held on February 9, 2026, themed ‘From Budget to Impact,’ drew inputs from government agencies, civil society groups, development partners and private sector stakeholders.

However, lawmakers raised concerns over delays in fund releases and other bureaucratic challenges that affected the implementation of the 2025 budget.

They called for urgent reforms, warning that such bottlenecks could weaken the impact of the 2026 fiscal plan.

The committee recommended stronger collaboration between the executive and legislature, as well as improved oversight to ensure the timely execution of projects.

It also proposed extending the 2025 Appropriation Act to June 30, 2026, to allow for the completion of ongoing projects.

Adeola commended members of the committee and stakeholders for their contributions, noting that collaboration with the House of Representatives ensured a balanced report.

He urged the Senate to approve the revised bill, describing it as critical to sustaining economic gains, addressing structural challenges and setting the country on a path of growth.

Like the Senate, the House of Representatives also passed the N68.30tn Appropriation Bill for the 2026 fiscal year.

At a plenary on Tuesday, presided over by the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, the House also approved extending the implementation of the capital component of the 2025 budget from March 31 to June 30, 2026.

Of the proposed total expenditure of N68.30tn, N34.33tn is the projected revenue for the year. Budget deficit is N23.85tn, representing 4.28 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product.

Macroeconomic assumptions of the budget consist of an oil benchmark of $64.85 per barrel, a production target of 1.84 million barrels per day, and an exchange rate of N1,400 to a dollar.

The Federal Government’s share of the main revenue pool is projected at N21.62tn, while the revenue targets for tax and non-tax sources are N124.25tn and N845.98 bn, respectively.

The government also hopes to generate N1.37tn from foreign aid and grants, with government-owned enterprises expected to contribute N10.27tn to the revenue pool.

The Federal Government allocated N618.13bn to the Niger Delta Development Commission, N244.07bn to the North-East Development Commission and N145bn to the North-West Development Commission. The South-West, South-South, South-East and North-West Development commissions had a statutory transfer of N140bn each.

Other statutory transfers include the National Assembly (N577.85bn), the Independent National Electoral Commission (N1tn), the National Human Rights Commission (N20bn) and the Public Complaints Commission (N29.46bn).

Also, domestic debt servicing, including ways and means, got N10.16tn, while foreign debt was allocated N5.36tn.

The presidency was allocated N142.42bn, the Ministry of Defence (N2.69tn), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (N287.90bn), and the Office of the Head of the Service of the Federation (N17.17bn), among others.

Addressing lawmakers shortly before the passage of the budget, the Chairman, House Committee on Appropriation, Mr Abubakar Bichi, said all amounts appropriated in the proposal shall be released from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation only for the purpose specified in the executive bill.

On virement, the Kano lawmaker noted that “if the implementation of any of the projects intended to be undertaken under this bill cannot be completed without virement, such virement shall only be effected with the prior approval of the National Assembly.”

He called on the Accountant General of the Federation to “immediately, upon coming into force of this bill, maintain a separate record for the documentation of revenue accruing to the Consolidated Revenue Fund in excess of the oil price benchmark adopted in this budget.”

According to Bichi, “such revenues refer to monies accruing from sales of government crude oil in excess of the approved benchmark price per barrel, the Petroleum Profit Tax and Royalty on Oil and Gas.”

With the Senate similarly passing the budget proposal, it is expected to be transmitted to the President for assent in the coming days.

Tinubu’s $6bn loan

The Senate and House of Representatives have also approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to secure fresh external loans totalling $6bn, in a move aimed at plugging fiscal gaps and financing key infrastructure projects.

The approval followed the presentation and consideration of reports by the Chairmen of the Senate and House Committees on Local and Foreign Debts, Senator Aliyu Wamakko (APC, Sokoto North) and his House of Representatives counterpart, Abubakar Nalaraba, on Tuesday.

The red chamber’s decision came just hours after the President formally wrote to the Senate seeking legislative backing for the facilities, underscoring the Executive’s push to shore up funding for priority sectors.

In a letter addressed to the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and read during plenary, Tinubu sought approval to borrow $5bn from Abu Dhabi Bank to support budget deficit financing and meet existing debt obligations.

See also  Walker, Texas Ranger star and martial arts icon Chuck Norris dies at 86

The president said the facility would be made available to Nigeria in tranches.

The letter partly read, “The purpose of this letter is to request for the approval and resolution of the national assembly pursuant to the provisions of section 21(1) and 27(1) of the debt management office establishment act 2003 to establish a structured total return swap derivative external financing programme from First Abu Dhabi Bank of the United Arab Emirates of up to $5bn which will be made available to the Federal Republic of Nigeria in tranches.”

Tinubu said the proceeds would be used for budget implementation, development of priority infrastructure projects and repayment of relatively expensive domestic and external debts.

He added that the facility would also help the federal government meet urgent financial obligations when necessary.

The president said Nigeria’s total public debt currently stands at $110.3bn, equivalent to about N159.2tn as of December 31, 2025.

In a separate letter, the president sought approval for a $1bn UK export finance loan facility arranged by Citibank, London branch.

Tinubu noted that the projects—covering the Lagos Port Complex and Tin Can Island Port—are designed to tackle longstanding operational challenges and reposition Nigeria’s maritime sector.

“The rehabilitation of the ports project is a strategic modernisation initiative of the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Nigerian Ports Authority to restore and upgrade two of Nigeria’s most vital ports, namely Tin Can Island Port complex and Lagos Port complex, Apapa, which have reached critical engineering failures,” the letter read.

Following the reading of the requests, Akpabio had referred both letters to the Senate Committee on Local and Foreign Debts, directing the panel to expedite consideration and report back promptly—a directive that culminated in Tuesday’s approval.

The latest borrowing request comes amid the Federal Government’s continued reliance on a mix of domestic and external loans to finance budget deficits and critical infrastructure.

Shortly after both letters were read by Mr Abbas, the requests were referred to the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debts Management.

The House thereafter dissolved into the Committee of Supply to consider the report.

Speaking on the substance of the request, Nalaraba who represents Awe/Doma/Keana Federal Constituency, Nasarawa State said, “The House should consider the report of the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt Management on the request for approval to establish a structured total return swap an external financing programme of $5bn with First Abu Dhabi Bank, to support Federal Government funding and fiscal liquidity management and approve recommendations therein.”

According to him, “the implementation of a total return swap transaction involving the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank in aggregate principal amount of up to $5bn together with the collateralisation of the transaction by the issuance of naira-denominated FGN Securities to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC as collateral for the loan of up to 133.3 per cent of the amount drawn.”

The Committee recommended that the Federal Government of Nigeria make margining payments to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC in dollars upon demand if, at any time, either due to fluctuations in the market prices of the Federal Government securities or as a result of movements in exchange rate or both, the value of the collateral issued to First Abu Dhabi Bank falls below the initial value at the time of issuance.”

Another recommendation includes “that the $5bn should be drawn down in tranches, with each tranche comprising a corresponding confirmation and other ancillary agreements (as may be required) between the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank.

“Authorisation of the use of proceeds for budget implementation, development of key infrastructure projects, which are of priority to the administration, repayment of relatively more expensive domestic and external debts in the Federal Government of Nigeria’s public debt portfolio.”

Both loan requests were unanimously approved when the lawmakers returned to plenary from the Committee on Supply, where the consideration took place.

Expert react

Commenting, the Chief Executive Officer of CSA Advisory and a development economist, Aliyu Ilias, urged the Federal Government to prioritise security, economic productivity and targeted support measures in deploying the proposed N9tn budget expansion.

Speaking in a telephone interview with our correspondent, Ilias said strengthening security should be the government’s foremost priority, noting that economic growth would remain constrained without stability across the country.

“The first sector these funds should be channelled into is security. Once we are able to stabilise the security situation, then we can look at the economy, particularly trade and industry, to make things actually work,” he said.

He also called for targeted interventions to cushion the impact of rising crude oil prices on Nigerians, suggesting that some form of subsidy or support mechanism may still be necessary.

See also  Mathematics no longer compulsory for Arts students, says FG

“I also expect a form of relative subsidy in terms of helping people to mitigate the effect of the rising price of crude oil and its impact on petrol prices. It can even be extended to critical players like Dangote as some form of leverage, if funds can be directed to that sector,” he added.

On the proposed budget review, Ilias said the move was not unexpected, citing Nigeria’s historical trend of revising budgets during the fiscal cycle.

He pointed to structural issues in past budgets, particularly the low implementation of capital projects, as justification for a larger fiscal framework.

The economist further explained that changes in global oil prices have altered Nigeria’s revenue outlook, creating room for upward budget adjustments.

While supporting a larger budget size, Ilias emphasised the need for improved revenue generation to sustain increased spending.

“For me, I am an advocate of a bigger budget, but only if we can strengthen our revenue side. A bigger budget allows us to implement more projects and drive development,” he stated.

He also stressed the importance of increasing capital expenditure, warning that rising global volatility could worsen Nigeria’s debt profile.

Ilias, however, cautioned that the effectiveness of the budget review would ultimately depend on how well the additional funds are utilised.

Also speaking, an economist, Professor Adeola Adenikinju, urged the Federal Government to prioritise the power sector, social investment programmes, infrastructure, and agriculture to address the country’s economic challenges and improve citizens’ welfare.

Speaking on key areas requiring urgent government attention, Adenikinju stressed the importance of electricity for economic growth and welfare.

“I think the power sector is very important. The power sector? Yes, given the role that the power sector, or electricity, plays in economic growth and welfare generally. The power sector is very important,” he said.

While noting that the sector has already been privatised, the economist pointed out that several unresolved challenges persist.

“I know it is privatised, but there are legacy issues that require further attention. The huge debt that is being owed is probably because of issues with tariffs,” he said.

According to him, the government must address major infrastructure gaps in the electricity value chain.

“We have to fix some of the infrastructural issues, particularly the transmission and distribution segments that are not working well. That is one sector that is very important,” he added.

Beyond power, Adenikinju also called for stronger social protection programmes to cushion the impact of ongoing economic reforms on vulnerable citizens.

“Then the government needs to pay more attention to social investment expenditure because a lot of people are feeling the impact of reform,” he said.

He noted that reforms introduced by the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had intensified inflationary pressures on households.

“The effect of the economic reforms that the president started about three years ago—removal of subsidy, the single-unit pricing, all of that—has led to severe inflation in the economy and has impacted negatively on the welfare of people,” he said.

Adenikinju emphasised that targeted relief measures are necessary for citizens most affected by the reforms.

“There needs to be an effective way of providing relief to very poor people who are badly affected by the reforms. Social investment is very important to take care of those who are extremely vulnerable and who are struggling,” he added.

The economist also identified poor infrastructure, particularly road networks, as a major contributor to rising food prices across the country.

“The other sector that I will mention is infrastructure. Our roads are bad. The roads leading to rural areas are very bad. Therefore, that has driven up the cost of food in many urban areas where a lot of consumers are,” he said.

He noted that improving transport links between rural production areas and urban markets would help reduce food costs.

“The road infrastructure has to be looked at. It has to be improved, especially the rural–urban areas and from the food-producing areas to urban centres,” he said.

Adenikinju further stressed the need for greater government support for farmers through improved access to agricultural inputs.

“Finally, I will say agriculture—by providing food seedlings for farmers and supporting fertilisers,” he said.

He warned that rising fertiliser prices, driven by global factors, were also affecting local food production.

“The prices of fertilisers have gone up because of the war. They also have to be supported. So these are the areas that I think should be prioritised, in my view,” he added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  Group lauds Nwoko’s call for Anioma State creation

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  Health minister, manufacturers clash over sugary drink levy

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  No pact with Atiku, Obi, Jonathan in 2027 says ADC faction

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  Tariff war; FG intervenes as states, Discos’ rift deepens

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  APC may pick Ganduje’s successor at make-or-break NEC meeting

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  NAF redeploys key leaders to rejig operational efficiency

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending