Connect with us

Lifestyle

Abdulsalami reveals why he told Obasanjo not to contest 1999 presidency

Published

on

Former Head of State, Gen Abdulsalami Abubakar (retd.), has disclosed that when Gen Olusegun Obasanjo came to see him after his release from prison in 1998, he advised him point-blank to abandon the idea of contesting the presidential election.

He said he told him at the time to go home, thank God he was alive, and forget about becoming President.

Abdulsalami also revealed that at the same meeting, he talked Obasanjo out of filing a lawsuit against the Federal Government over his wrongful imprisonment, warning him that the court process was uncertain and offering instead to explore compensation for the collapse of his business during his years in detention.

The accounts are contained in Chapter 22 of Abdulsalami’s 264-page, 27-chapter autobiography titled ‘Call of Duty,’ obtained by our correspondent at the public presentation of the book at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja.

The presentation was held to mark the former Head of State’s 84th birthday and was attended by President Bola Tinubu, who was represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima as the special guest of honour.

Describing the encounter, Adulsalami wrote that Obasanjo came to him with two issues after his release: his intention to sue the government and the invitation from the Peoples Democratic Party to contest the presidency.

“I was forthright with him. One, I advised him that he should not take the government to court because it might not augur well.

“For one, he would not know how long it would take the court to give judgment. I told him that, as a government, we would try to see what could be done about his business in the form of compensation.

“The court process was uncertain, I told him. I tried to dissuade him from pursuing the litigation option, and he agreed with me,” he wrote.

Abdulsalami continued, “On the invitation by the PDP that he should run in the presidential race, I advised him to return home and thank God that he was still alive after all he had gone through in four years. I told him point-blank that he should forget about contesting to be President.

“He took a deep sigh and said he was going to think about it and revert. He never got back to me. He can confirm this encounter.”

The former head of state argued that the fact that Obasanjo ultimately contested and won the election should not be taken as evidence that his administration was behind the candidacy.

See also  Saheed Osupa thanks Burna Boy for calling him ‘GOAT’ singer

“I tell people till today that my administration had nothing to do with the presidential ambition of General Obasanjo.

“It may be hard to believe, but we did not endorse him, and we did not work for him. It was a conjecture.

“As I have said several times, as a government, we decided to release all political prisoners. We did not pick and choose. We did not single any individual out for favour. General Obasanjo was one of those prisoners who regained freedom,” he stated.

According to him, “Some said because we granted him a pardon, which allowed him to run for office, that meant we were working for him.

“But we released and pardoned scores of political prisoners. It was because General Obasanjo ended up as the President that people overlooked the other prisoners that were pardoned as well.”

Abdulsalami also acknowledged that there were reports of retired Generals working behind the scenes to persuade Obasanjo to run, believing he could unite Nigerians at that critical moment. But he distanced himself and his government from those efforts.

“There were reports that some retired Generals worked behind the scenes to persuade General Obasanjo to run because they believed he was the one who could unite Nigerians at that critical time, given his experience, network and knowledge.

“I read the reports, too. I was also aware of efforts made by some people to ensure that somebody who was nationally acceptable was elected as President.

“Those were private initiatives and had nothing to do with our government or me,” he wrote.

In the chapter, Abdulsalami also gave an account of how he deliberately bent the electoral rules to ensure the Alliance for Democracy, the party formed by NADECO and the Afenifere Yoruba socio-cultural organisation, was registered as a political party, even though it failed to meet the criteria his administration had set.

He said that by the criteria for party registration, which required presence in two-thirds of the 36 states, legal registration, offices in the FCT and state capitals, and a constitution, the Peoples Democratic Party and the All Peoples Party were clearly the top two, while the AD could realistically only win the six south-western states.

He said, “We had to apply some wisdom and flexibility. As projected, the AD eventually didn’t meet the criteria for the registration of political parties. We tinkered with the rules and said any party that came third would be registered. That was how AD scaled through.

“We did not want to create a system in which the South-West would feel marginalised. Whatever decision we took was for the peace and progress of the country. If tinkering with the rule we made ourselves would give respite to Nigerians, why not?

See also  Moses Olaiya Adejumo, widely celebrated by his stage name Baba Sala

“The rules were made by humans and for humans. The idea was to give peace a chance and to ensure that there was equity and justice.”

Abdulsalami also explained why Nigeria’s return to civilian rule came in May 1999 rather than October 1998, the date Abacha had announced before his death.

He said the October date was never feasible, as his administration scrapped Abacha’s entire transition programme as lacking credibility, adding that May 1999 was ultimately determined not by political calculation but by a request from the judiciary.

According to him, “My first suggestion was that we should draw up a six-month transition plan. That would have seen us hand over to a democratically elected President by March 1999.

“However, when I called for a meeting with the military echelon and the judiciary, Justice Muhammadu Uwais, then Chief Justice of Nigeria, said he would need at least sixty days after the elections to ensure that all the judicial matters brought to the courts were dispensed with before inauguration.

“That was how we arrived at May 1999. It was a function of a judicial request and my desire to make the transition process as short as possible. Six months was the fastest we could do to organise elections and give the political parties the time to set up and prepare.”

He disclosed that he faced pressure from multiple directions not to hand over at all, including from some of his own military colleagues, from some West African Heads of State, from segments of the international community, and even from some NADECO members who felt they had been caught flat-footed by the speed of the transition and wanted more time.

“Initially, there was intense pressure from some of my colleagues, some Heads of State in the West African sub-region and some in the international community that it was too soon to transition to democracy.

“Surprisingly, there were pressures from some NADECO members too. Two to three months into my administration, some NADECO members realised that I was sincere about the handover date, and they saw themselves as short-changed because they were not politicking as they should have done.

See also  Crispin Curtis Adeniyi-Jones (1876–1957): Medical Pioneer and Nigerian Nationalist

“They felt they had missed the train and wanted to come on board, which made them request more time to get their act together,” he wrote.

He said when NADECO came to him requesting an extension, he turned the tables on them, demanding that they write a formal letter requesting the extension and call a press conference publicly endorsing the request, which they declined.

“I promised that if they did that, I would grant an extension. But they never did. I knew they wouldn’t. We went ahead with our programme,” Abdulsalami wrote.

He said some of his military colleagues were also hostile to handing over to civilians, but that he was personally unmoved by any temptation to stay.

“For me, I was not in any way tempted to stay longer in office. I had made up my mind. By the time I took over the reins of power, the country was on the edge.

“There was extreme pressure from NADECO, G-34, and other political players for the military to go.

“Nigeria was at a breaking point. The military needed to relinquish power,” he wrote.

On the eve of the May 29, 1999, handover, Abdulsalami said he slept soundly, noting that the only nights he had not slept since taking power were the first few nights.

“I slept well that night. I always slept well, apart from the day I assumed power when I didn’t sleep a wink for days.

“Thereafter, I always slept well, even though I worked round the clock at times. But that was a choice. I had no anxieties whatsoever on the eve of the handover. I had made up my mind to relinquish power within the shortest possible time, and I didn’t have any issues that I was about to leave power.

“Rather, I was happy that as much as possible, we had brought peace to the country and stabilised the military too,” he wrote.

He added that on the morning of May 29, 1999, he took Obasanjo on a familiarisation tour of the Presidential Villa, introduced him to staff, and, after the handover ceremony, drove back to Minna, his personal belongings having already been moved out a week earlier.

“As we drove through towns and villages, people gathered by the roadside to wave to us. It was quite a sight. I was a very happy man,” he wrote.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

Why Do Some People Hate Being Corrected?

Published

on

Some people can accept praise without a problem—but the moment you point out their mistake, everything changes.

You bring facts, they bring anger.

You try to explain, they become defensive.

You calmly point out that they may be wrong, and suddenly you become the problem.

But why?

For some people, being corrected feels like an attack on their intelligence, authority, or pride. Instead of seeing correction as an opportunity to learn, they see it as an attempt to embarrass them.

And let’s be honest: nobody knows everything.

Even intelligent and experienced people make mistakes. The ability to listen, reconsider your position, and admit when you are wrong is not weakness—it is a sign of maturity.

At the same time, correction should be done with respect. There is a big difference between helping someone understand their mistake and deliberately embarrassing them in front of others.

The real question is:

Do people hate being corrected because of pride, or because they genuinely believe they are right?

And another question:

How do you react when someone points out that you are wrong?

👇 Share your opinion in the comments. Let’s have an honest conversation.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  ‘I’m A Wise Woman Unlike You, People Should Stop Taking You Seriously’ – Iyabo Ojo Blasts VeryDarkMan
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Parental Trauma vs. Outside Trauma: Which Hurts Children More?

Published

on

A child can survive many difficult experiences—but what happens when the person causing the pain is the same person they expect to protect them?

This is a question many families may not want to discuss.

Trauma from outsiders can come from bullying, relatives, teachers, friends, or other people. It can damage a child’s confidence and leave emotional scars for years.

But parental trauma can feel different.

When a child repeatedly experiences humiliation, rejection, harsh insults, neglect, constant comparison, fear, or emotional abuse from a parent, the child may begin to question their own worth.

The painful irony is that the child may still desperately want the love and approval of the person hurting them.

But here is where the debate gets complicated:

Is parental trauma always worse than trauma from outsiders?

Or can an experience involving an outsider be just as devastating—or even worse—depending on what happened and how long it lasted?

🔥 THE NEWSBREAK365 QUESTION:

Which one do you think hurts children more?

🔴 PARENTAL TRAUMA
🔵 TRAUMA CAUSED BY OUTSIDERS

Don’t just choose one.

Tell us what you think and explain your reasons. 👇

Someone reading your comment may see their own childhood experience differently.

What do you think?

#NewsBreak365 #ChildhoodTrauma #Parenting #ParentingDebate #FamilyMatters #ChildProtection #MentalHealth #AfricanParents #NigerianParents #LetsTalk

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Crispin Curtis Adeniyi-Jones (1876–1957): Medical Pioneer and Nigerian Nationalist
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Tunde Kelani reveals why he is still passionate about filmmaking

Published

on

Veteran filmmaker and cinematographer, Tunde Kelani, discusses with VERA ALKALI about his career and current trends in the industry

You have had an extraordinary journey in the film industry. Can you take us through the highest and lowest moments of your career?

You cannot just say the highest moments because that is a jump. I joined the industry at an early age. I had uncles who were already in the industry, but I also grew up in a community in Abeokuta (Ogun State) where I was exposed to different forms of culture and oral traditions.

As soon as I could read and write in Yoruba, I took off from there. Abeokuta is a meeting point of culture, and my experience started from there. I could read to my grandfather, and we learnt English alongside Yoruba. I was able to compare what I learnt from social studies with what I learnt through Yoruba culture.

That was how I started. Later, I went into photography and eventually moved into motion pictures. I was employed by Western United Television, where I was trained primarily as a film cameraman.

I later attended the London Film School for the artistic and technical aspects of filmmaking. When I returned, I worked in television for one or two years before becoming an independent filmmaker.

From that point, I began to see films by people such as Professor Wole Soyinka, Bandesola Oru, Rasheed Onikoyi and Hubert Ogunde. I had known some of these people and had seen their works on the big screen.

Before then, I was already a film enthusiast. I practically saw all the films that came into Lagos and were shown in some of the theatres at the time.

On the high side, I think I chose the medium of cinema particularly to promote, preserve and document the rich Yoruba culture.

I have benefited from global cinema, including Hollywood, Japanese, Indian, Italian and European cinema, but people often ask me, “What is your style?” I tell them my style is unique. Having benefited from global cinema, I am still impressed by the Yoruba acting tradition.

I have seen people such as Kola Ogunmola and Oyin Adejobi. Those were my coaches. I also had many mentors, and that became my take-off point.

You mentioned being influenced by Hollywood, Japanese, Italian and other cinemas. What cultural differences or shocks did you experience in filmmaking and cinematography?

I think global cinema is about identity. You just know it. When you see an Indian film, you know it is Indian. When you see a Japanese film, you know it is Japanese. When you see a South Korean film, you know it is South Korean.

When you see me as a Yoruba man with my abetiaja cap on, you know that is our signature.

You have worked as a cinematographer, director and producer. Which aspect of filmmaking would you say is your favourite?

I trained for two years at the London Film School. The course specialised in the Diploma of Art and Technical Filmmaking.

Primarily, I am a storyteller. I share my experiences, our culture and our history, but I use cinema as my vehicle for dissemination.

See also  Kajuru Castle: Nigeria’s Bavarian-Style Hilltop Retreat (PHOTOS)

You are a Yoruba man and have made films that strongly reflect Yoruba culture. What does it mean to you to convey your messages in Yoruba and preserve the culture through film?

That is my whole being. It is my essence. It is my culture and language.

I am an advocate for indigenous cultural expression, and I believe Nigeria should be united in diversity.

Our films are not displaying enough of that diversity. We have more than 300 languages, but we hardly see movies depicting these different cultures and languages in Nigeria.

As someone who is committed to indigenous storytelling, how do you decide which stories are worth telling?

My works are classified. Most of them are adaptations from literature. ‘Oleku’ and some of my works were written by authors such as Femi Osofisan and others.

Most of the films I make are adapted from texts. So, I work more from text to screen because of my background. I have read works by many of these authors.

Some are classified as ‘conscience drama’ because they are films that explore socio-political themes. ‘Saworoide’, ‘Arugba’ and ‘Campus Queen’ are examples of socio-political films.

What attracted you to bringing literature to the screen?

I was born in Lagos, but my father decided that I should be brought up in Abeokuta. I was taken to the family compound. I missed my mother, but I had a lot of people around me catering for me.

However, I felt lonely. As soon as I could read and write, I found reading to be a comfort, and a form of escape At that point, literature got stuck with me, and I learnt how to use it.

It is difficult for filmmakers to pick a favourite among their works, but if you had to choose one, which would it be?

All my works give me satisfaction and recognition. They also came with equal amounts of ups and downs because making a successful film is very challenging.

But my latest film, ‘Cordelia’, is my favourite.

Can you take us through the making of Cordelia?

‘Cordelia’ is adapted from Femi Osofisan’s novel of the same title, and I had kept the project for years.

In fact, I was going to make it before ‘Maami’ (which was released in 2012). When I got to Femi Osofisan and we discussed it, he wondered why I was interested in it. He went in and brought ‘Maami, but I insisted that I wanted ‘Cordelia’ at the time.

About three or four years ago, I received visitors from the University of Delaware in the United States. The music department wanted a sort of cultural fusion. They said that if we made the soundtrack for the film, they would orchestrate it in the United States.

I was interested. They were asking for an old film from me, but I said, ‘No, we would do a new film.’

I told them about ‘Cordelia’ and explained that it was the new film we wanted to make because the story could inspire a solid musical score. It is so dramatic that it can inspire a strong musical composition.

See also  PHOTOS: Nollywood Actress Allwell Ademola was finally la!d to rest in Lagos

When you compare filmmaking today with what obtained in your early days, which era do you feel more connected to?

It does not matter because I have worked with all the new technologies of making motion pictures.

Recently, I completed an experiment in a small studio which I call “Studio Lab”, where I combined all the known technologies of making motion pictures, including physical sets, green screen, traditional props and everything else.

I have also added digital cinema cameras and artificial intelligence. So, it combines all of them.

What is your view on artificial intelligence and its growing role in filmmaking?

Artificial intelligence is everything, but just like when computers came and they added sound cards and graphics cards, I knew it was going to come into motion picture production.

I started early. It is the same thing with any technology that comes along. I embrace it.

We should embrace technology, but it should not replace our culture or our language. We should be in control and not let it tell our stories for us.

How do you blend artificial intelligence with Yoruba culture and other indigenous cultures?

Artificial intelligence technology is already a tool. Most of the time, if we are making a movie, our script is written in English. Later, we indicate the dialogue in Yoruba.

Filmmaking is a collaborative medium. You can have 150 people working on a film, and most of them may not be Yoruba.

You document, organise the group and use everything that technology provides. The technology is the tool, but the product becomes whatever you want it to be.

There has been an emergence of more Nigerian movies in cinemas. Do you think contemporary directors and producers are doing enough to preserve Nigerian cultures?

We have gatekeepers; I mean those people who fund movies. They are not necessarily interested in cultural preservation. They want to invest in a business, recoup their money and make a profit.

So, it is business. You can make a movie that they do not think will sell well, and that becomes a challenge.

The world is rapidly changing, and people’s tastes are changing as well.

I consider myself a “techie”. Even with all my experience with technology, I am still surprised by how many things you can do with a smartphone. Today, I lectured with my smartphone.

That is what technology is all about. We have witnessed similar things with the advent of video games and mobile phones, and now we are talking about artificial intelligence. These are all tools.

You recently received an award from the Nigerian Academy of Letters. Did you expect this kind of recognition when you were starting out?

I never really set out with recognition in mind. I was simply passionate about what I was doing. From photography to cinematography, advertising, music and everything else I got involved in, I was driven by the desire to create and communicate.

See also  Why Babangida removed me in 1985 - Buhari

I had stories I wanted to share with people, and that was what occupied my mind. I wanted to use whatever medium was available to me to tell those stories and connect with people. I was more concerned about the work itself and how best I could express what I had in mind than about whether anybody would recognise or reward me for it.

So, awards were never the motivation. They are certainly appreciated, and I am grateful whenever my work is recognised, but when I was starting out, I was not thinking about receiving awards many years later. I was simply following my passion, learning along the way and trying to tell stories that I believed were worth telling.

If you are passionate about what you do and remain committed to it, recognition may come, but it should not be the reason you do the work.

Many young filmmakers and creatives look up to you. What is your advice to them?

Number one, it is about passion.

You have to be passionate about what you are doing. If you are not passionate about it, it becomes very difficult to sustain yourself, especially in a creative field where you will face many challenges, disappointments and moments when things may not go the way you want.

In fact, my case is different. I am not supposed to be known because I am the person behind the camera. I am not a star. My job has always been to help tell the story and make sure that the story gets across to the audience in the best possible way. I have always been comfortable being behind the camera and allowing the work to speak for me.

For young filmmakers, I would say they should not be in a hurry to become famous. They should concentrate on learning their craft, understanding the medium and developing their own voice. You must be willing to learn continuously because filmmaking is changing all the time. The technology changes, the platforms change and the way people consume stories changes, but the fundamental need to tell good stories remains.

They should also understand that there are many different roles in filmmaking. You do not necessarily have to be the person in front of the camera. You can be a cinematographer, editor, writer, sound designer, production designer, director or work in any of the other areas that make filmmaking possible. What matters is that you find the area where your passion lies and develop yourself in it.

For me, the most important thing is to remain committed to the work. Fame and recognition may come, but they should be secondary. If you have passion, discipline and a story to tell, keep working at it. Eventually, the quality of your work will speak for you.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending