Connect with us

News

El-Rufai abused medical visit, doctor arrested – ICPC

Published

on

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on Tuesday alleged that former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, violated the conditions of a court-approved medical visit while in the commission’s custody.

The commission also announced the arrest of his personal physician, Prof Bello Abubakar, for allegedly making false statements.

In a statement by its spokesperson and Head of Media and Public Communications, John Odey, the commission said it had facilitated El-Rufai’s medical visit in compliance with a court directive and its statutory obligation to respect the rights and welfare of persons in its custody.

The ICPC disclosed that the Kaduna State High Court had fixed July 6, 7 and 8, 2026, for the accelerated hearing of criminal charges against the former governor but that he failed to appear on the first day of proceedings.

According to the commission, its prosecution team informed the court that when officers arrived to convey El-Rufai to court, he declined to accompany them, insisting on seeing his personal doctor.

“The prosecution further informed the court that no prior request had been made to the commission for such medical consultation and that, when asked by the commission’s medical doctor, the defendant reportedly indicated that he had no immediate medical complaints but stated that his wife, Aisha El-Rufai, who is also one of his legal counsel, had requested that he see his personal physician, Prof Bello Abubakar,” the statement said.

The commission said the court subsequently adjourned the matter until July 15, 2026, to hear El-Rufai’s application seeking the trial judge’s recusal and to await the decision of the Chief Judge of Kaduna State on a petition seeking the transfer of the case.

It stated that despite the adjournment, it approved the medical visit in line with the court’s directive.

“During the hospital visit on Tuesday, 7th July, 2026, at the private wing of the National Hospital, FCT, officers of the commission’s medical and security team conducted themselves professionally and respected the defendant’s privacy,” the statement said.

The commission added that, at the request of El-Rufai’s family members, its officers remained outside the consultation room while the attending oncologist was said to be examining him.

However, the ICPC alleged that it later discovered photographs posted on Facebook by one of El-Rufai’s political associates, Isa Ashiru, showing the former governor with several visitors, including Prof Abubakar, during the period designated for the medical consultation.

“The images and post by Isa Kudan indicated that the arranged medical visit was utilised for activities outside the scope contemplated by the court and the ICPC. This is a clear violation of the court order,” the commission stated.

The anti-graft agency said it had managed El-Rufai and other suspects in its custody “with patience, professionalism and courtesy,” but alleged that such goodwill had been abused.

“The ICPC will bring to the attention of the courts the flagrant disobedience of court orders by the defendant. The professional and humane nature of the ICPC should not be taken for granted,” it added.

The commission further announced that Prof Abubakar had been arrested.

“At this moment, Prof Bello Abubakar, El-Rufai’s personal physician, has been taken into custody for further investigation.

See also  Failed peace talks: You can’t dictate terms to Iran – Javad Zarif to US

“The ICPC reiterates its resolve to continue to operate within the ambit of the law at all times.

“The commission also wants to make it categorically clear that it will not tolerate, under any guise, the abuse of its goodwill by anybody or group of persons,” the statement said.

Earlier on Tuesday, the Kaduna State High Court adjourned proceedings to await the decision of the state’s CJ on an application seeking the transfer of El-Rufai’s case to another judge.

Justice Darius Khobo fixed July 15 for the hearing of the defendant’s application after the defence asked the court to recuse itself from the case, citing a lack of confidence in obtaining justice before the judge.

The matter, which had earlier been slated for accelerated hearing on July 6, 7 and 8, could not proceed after El-Rufai failed to appear in court.

Lead prosecuting counsel, Chief Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), told the court that the former governor declined to accompany operatives to court because he wanted to consult his personal physician.

Adedipe said El-Rufai neither informed the commission beforehand of his intention to see his doctor nor complained of any illness when he was examined by the commission’s medical personnel.

“The defendant was examined by the commission’s doctor and indicated that he had no health complaints. He only stated that he wanted to honour his wife’s request to see his personal doctor,” the prosecutor told the court.

He further disclosed that the prosecution was served on Monday morning with a motion filed by the defence seeking Justice Khobo’s recusal and a stay of proceedings pending the determination of the application.

Adedipe opposed the request, arguing that the Kaduna State Administration of Criminal Justice Law, 2017, empowers the court to continue with criminal proceedings where a defendant deliberately absents himself.

He also maintained that the law does not recognise applications seeking a stay of criminal proceedings.

Counsel for the defendant, Ubong Akpan, however, urged the court not to proceed with the accelerated hearing, saying a formal petition had already been submitted to the Chief Judge of Kaduna State requesting that the matter be reassigned to another judge.

Akpan argued that since both the recusal application and the petition were pending, it would be inappropriate for the court to continue with the trial until the CJ determined the request.

Delivering his ruling, Justice Khobo agreed with the prosecution that the Administration of Criminal Justice Law permits a court to proceed where a defendant wilfully refuses to attend trial and that the mere filing of a recusal application does not automatically stay criminal proceedings.

The judge, however, held that since the CJ had already received a petition seeking the transfer of the case, the court would await his directive before proceeding with the substantive trial.

“The court will await the directive of the Honourable Chief Judge on the petition seeking the transfer of this case before proceeding further,” Justice Khobo ruled.

El-Rufai is facing an amended nine-count charge bordering on alleged abuse of office, fraud, conferring undue advantage, irregular award and execution of public contracts, money laundering and unlawful handling of public funds during his eight-year tenure as governor of Kaduna State.

See also  FG Updates Terrorism Sponsors’ List

The ICPC alleges that the offences involved the diversion and mismanagement of public funds as well as violations of procurement procedures.

The former governor pleaded not guilty to all the charges and has consistently maintained that the prosecution is politically motivated.

ADC alleges assault

The ADC has accused the Federal Government of subjecting El-Rufai to political persecution, alleging that operatives of the ICPC denied him access to medical treatment, arrested his personal physician and assaulted his wife.

In a statement issued on Tuesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the opposition party described the alleged incident as evidence that Nigeria was “sliding into tyranny” and called for El-Rufai’s immediate access to medical care, family members and legal representatives.

According to the ADC, El-Rufai was taken to the National Hospital, Abuja, for medical attention after his health reportedly deteriorated.

The party claimed that despite medical advice recommending his admission, ICPC officials allegedly insisted on returning him to custody.

The party further alleged that protests by El-Rufai’s wife and personal physician led to a confrontation during which his wife was assaulted while the doctor was arrested.

“The actions of the ICPC and the Tinubu government have for months now gone beyond the realm of law enforcement.

“They have become an assault on the Constitution of 200 million Nigerians, on human dignity, and on the most basic principles of justice and human rights,” the statement read in part.

The ADC also described El-Rufai as a “political prisoner,” accusing the government of President Bola Tinubu of using state institutions to target political opponents.

“The world should know today that President Bola Tinubu is holding a political prisoner in Nigeria by the name of Mallam Nasir El-Rufai,” the party stated.

It argued that denying a detainee access to medical care and family members ran contrary to democratic principles and existing court orders.

“No democratic government that claims to respect the rule of law should deny a detainee access to medical care or prevent close family members from seeing him in flagrant disobedience of the courts,” the statement said.

The opposition party warned that the development extended beyond El-Rufai’s personal circumstances and raised broader concerns about the state of Nigeria’s democracy.

“This is no longer about Mallam El-Rufai alone. It is about whether Nigeria remains a constitutional democracy or has descended into a republic where law enforcement agencies have become instruments of political persecution,” Abdullahi said.

The ADC also demanded explanations from the ICPC over the alleged denial of access to El-Rufai’s family and doctor, as well as the reported arrest of his physician.

Among its demands, the party called for unrestricted access for El-Rufai to his wife, children, legal team and personal doctors, a review of his bail conditions, an end to what it described as degrading detention conditions, full compliance with constitutional safeguards for persons in custody, and greater transparency from the anti-corruption agency.

El-Rufai’s wife laments

Hajiya El-Rufai, on Tuesday, appealed to President Bola Tinubu to ensure her husband receives fair treatment, saying the family had endured trauma despite the support they gave the President during the 2023 election campaign.

See also  NEPC, workers dismiss strike reports, affirm industrial harmony

Asia, who spoke alongside El-Rufai’s other wife, Aichatou, at their Abuja residence, said the family was not asking the President to interfere with the ongoing trial but to ensure that the former governor enjoyed the constitutional rights guaranteed to every Nigerian.

Asia also alleged that her husband, who she said had been diagnosed with high blood pressure and high blood sugar, had been denied access to adequate medical treatment.

She recalled the role she and her husband played during Tinubu’s presidential campaign.

“Mr President, Sir, I campaigned for you. I stood up and went to every nook and cranny of Kaduna State for you. My husband stood by your side. Is this what our family deserves?

“The ball is in your court, Mr President. All these can stop if you say a word. We believe that you are a father, and we know you can empathise,” she stated.

Asia maintained that the family was not seeking special treatment or political interference in the legal process.

“Please, I am not asking you to tell them not to prosecute him, but we are asking you to allow him the basic human rights that the constitution you swore to uphold and defend guarantees.

“Let them give him the bail that he can afford. If he is guilty, let the court decide. If he is innocent, let the court decide,” she said.

She alleged that El-Rufai’s continued detention and restrictions on access to doctors, relatives and lawyers had left the family traumatised.

“We, the family, are traumatised. We live in constant fear that we will wake up and hear some bad news.

“I honestly think that what they are doing is more about psychological warfare against Malam and his family. If they humiliate, dehumanise and put us in constant fear, they feel it affects him,” she said.

Asia also questioned the reported decision to deny El-Rufai’s personal physician access to him.

“We were told that orders from ‘above’ said Professor Bello Abubakar cannot have access to anybody for 24 hours. Who is the ‘above’?” she asked.

The family further alleged that El-Rufai had been denied regular access to his personal doctors while visits by relatives had become increasingly restricted.

They also raised concerns over a medical report purportedly issued by the National Hospital Abuja, saying questions surrounding the document’s authenticity and the circumstances under which it was issued should be investigated through the consultant whose name appeared on it.

According to Asia, the restrictions had also affected the former governor’s ability to prepare his defence.

She reiterated the family’s appeal for El-Rufai to be granted bail on conditions he could reasonably meet pending the conclusion of his trial.

“We do not shy away from defending ourselves, but we want a fair trial. We want an opportunity to be heard. Malam cannot adequately prepare for his defence while he remains in custody and has limited access to his lawyers,” she said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

UK, Canada, Australia slam Israel ending probe into aid worker killings

Published

on

Britain, Canada and Australia on Friday condemned as “shameful” Israel’s decision to close an investigation into the death of seven aid workers killed in Gaza in 2024.

The World Central Kitchen employees — three Britons, a dual US-Canadian national, a Pole, an Australian and a Palestinian — died in a drone strike on their vehicle convoy after overseeing the unloading of a food aid shipment.

Israel’s military called the incident a “tragic mistake.”

“In the more than two years since, we have been pressing for Israel to swiftly and thoroughly consider the case and hold those responsible to account,” the three nations said in a joint statement.

“The announcement by the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) on 19 August 2026 that it would not pursue criminal investigations into this strike, without further explanation, is shameful,” it said.

The incident in April 2024 sparked global outrage and renewed calls to ensure the safety of aid workers in Gaza.

“Announcing this decision on World Humanitarian Day, while the world honoured the courage and sacrifice of humanitarians, was particularly egregious,” the joint statement added.

The Israeli military acknowledged a series of errors at various levels of command, but a preliminary investigation concluded on Wednesday that there was no “reasonable suspicion of criminal misconduct.”

“Israel extends its condolences to the families of the seven World Central Kitchen aid workers… who tragically lost their lives under deeply regrettable circumstances,” Israel’s foreign ministry posted on X on Friday.

It said the decision not to launch a criminal probe “was made by Israel’s independent military prosecution authorities on the basis of strict professional and legal considerations.”

See also  Presidential Pardon: Why Maryam Sanda, 85 convicts got lesser sentences– AGF

“We remain committed to the safety of humanitarian personnel, compliance with international humanitarian law and preventing such tragedies from recurring,” it added.

The US-based World Central Kitchen condemned the decision not to launch a criminal investigation, calling it “inconsistent with the full truth and deeply offensive.”

It demanded an independent commission to investigate the airstrikes “because the IDF cannot credibly investigate its own conduct.”

On Thursday, Australia expressed outrage at the closure of the investigation and summoned Israel’s ambassador to the country.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

FBI asks US court to keep records on Tinubu drug trafficking probe secret

Published

on

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has asked a US court for permission to submit a confidential declaration explaining why it is withholding some records relating to allegations linking President Bola Tinubu to a drug-trafficking investigation.

The FBI made the request in an application dated August 20 before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, saying it could not publicly disclose the full reasons for withholding certain information.

An ex parte, in camera declaration is a submission made privately to a judge for consideration without being placed on the public record.

The application was published on X on Thursday by Von Batten-Montague-York, a Washington-based lobbying firm recently hired by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar.

The FBI said it had invoked various exemptions under the US Freedom of Information Act in response to requests for records relating to Tinubu from 1992 to 1993.

According to the agency, releasing the withheld information “would, among other things, disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations and/or could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual”.

Part of the FBI’s application reads: “One of the requests at issue is the request assigned Request Number 1588244-000, which sought “[t]he entire FBI file for Bola Ahmed Tinubu, DOB 3/29/1952, President-Elect of Nigeria as of February 2023”.

“Plaintiff submitted a second FOIA request to the FBI seeking “FBI 302 interviews with Bola Tinubu from FBI Case No. 245-IP-71386-UUUUUU during the timeframe 1992-1993”.

“This was assigned Request Number 1593615-000. The FBI has invoked various Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Exemptions, including 6, 7(C), 7(D), 7(E) and 7(F) regarding these requests, and determined the information withheld from Plaintiff in this case, if disclosed, would, among other things, disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations and/or could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.

See also  Corruption: Many people in public office today were not well brought up - Emir of Kano, Sanusi II

“The FBI has determined that it cannot provide on the public record the full basis for the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to certain withholdings and that, therefore, an ex parte, under seal declaration is necessary.”

The FBI said that if the court granted its request, it would submit the confidential declaration explaining the reasons for withholding the information before August 28.

The plaintiff in the case is Aaron Greenspan, an American businessman and founder of PlainSite.

The development came after the US Department of Justice sought an additional 10-day extension to respond to a court order concerning the release of records linked to allegations involving Tinubu.

However, Judge Beryl Howell granted only four additional days, moving the deadline to August 21.

 

 

Tinubu, through his legal team, subsequently joined the DOJ’s request for an additional 10-day extension. Howell, however, declined the request.

Between 2022 and 2023, Greenspan filed 12 Freedom of Information Act requests with six US federal agencies, seeking records from investigations into a Chicago heroin ring that operated in the early 1990s.

He sought records concerning four individuals whom he said were linked to the drug ring, including Tinubu, Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Adegboyega Akande and Abiodun Agbele.

Five of the agencies responded that they could neither confirm nor deny the existence of the requested records.

Dissatisfied with the responses, Greenspan approached the Department of Justice’s Office of Information Policy.

The OIP upheld the agencies’ refusal to confirm or deny the existence of the requested records, according to court documents.

See also  EU extends Russia sanctions until October 2026 following hybrid threats

On June 12, 2023, Greenspan filed a lawsuit challenging the agencies’ use of what is known as a Glomar response to his FOIA requests.

A Glomar response is an official refusal by a US government agency to confirm or deny whether requested records exist.

The FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, Internal Revenue Service, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and Department of State were initially named as defendants.

The Central Intelligence Agency was later added as a defendant in the first amended complaint.

In April 2025, Howell ruled that the responses issued by the FBI and DEA were “improper and must be lifted”.

The judge held that the two agencies had failed to establish a sufficient privacy interest to justify keeping secret the fact that Tinubu was a subject of a criminal investigation.

Howell also held that the FBI and DEA had failed to provide enough evidence to justify maintaining their Glomar responses.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Over 46 bodies recovered in Sokoto boat accident

Published

on

At least 46 bodies have so far been recovered following a boat accident in Gorau community, Goronyo Local Government Area of Sokoto State, the state Police Command has confirmed.

The accident occurred on Thursday when a boat carrying 77 passengers, including men, women and children, reportedly capsized in the community.

Confirming the incident, the spokesperson for the Sokoto State Police Command, DSP Ahmed Rufai, said 46 corpses had been recovered while 15 passengers were rescued alive.

Rufai said rescue operations were still ongoing, with security agencies and emergency responders searching for the remaining 16 passengers.

According to him, the rescue team comprises local divers, officials of the National Emergency Management Agency, the State Emergency Management Agency and the Police.

He said, “46 corpses have so far been recovered, while 15 persons were rescued alive. The rescue team, comprising local divers, NEMA, SEMA and the Police, is still searching for the remaining 16 persons.”

The police spokesman added that “77 persons were on board the boat at the time of the incident.”

The development has thrown Gorau community into mourning, with families anxiously waiting for information about their loved ones.

The latest incident occurred exactly one year after a similar boat accident in Kijio community, also in Goronyo Local Government Area.

Earlier, a resident of Gorau who spoke on condition of anonymity said the accident occurred Thursday morning, although the casualty figure was initially difficult to establish.

The resident said, “Only a few people were initially reported rescued, while several bodies were recovered from the water. Rescue efforts are ongoing as local divers and emergency responders continue searching for those still missing.”

See also  Corruption: Many people in public office today were not well brought up - Emir of Kano, Sanusi II

The resident appealed to the authorities to intensify the rescue operation, saying many families were still waiting anxiously for news of their relatives.

Meanwhile, a senior NEMA official who identified himself simply as Alhaji Ibrahim told our correspondent that the agency had mobilised personnel to the community.

He said, “Our officials are currently on their way to the community to join the rescue operation.”

The cause of the accident was not immediately known, while rescue operations continued as of the time of filing this report.

Meanwhile, the African Democratic Congress governorship candidate in Sokoto State, Hon. Manir Muhammad Dan’iya, has expressed deep sorrow over the boat accident in Gorau town, Goronyo Local Government Area.

Reacting to the tragedy in a statement issued by his Media Aide, Aminu Abdullahi, Dan’iya described the incident as a “devastating tragedy,” particularly as some of the passengers were reportedly children between the ages of 10 and 15 travelling with farmers and labourers.

He said, “I am deeply saddened by this tragic incident and the loss of precious lives in Gorau. My thoughts and prayers are with the families who have lost their loved ones and those whose relatives are still missing.”

The ADC candidate commended local divers and residents participating in the rescue operation, while urging the Sokoto State Government and relevant emergency agencies to immediately deploy additional personnel, medical teams and rescue equipment to the affected community.

Dan’iya also called for proper identification and documentation of victims to enable their families to receive appropriate assistance.

He said the incident had exposed the urgent need to provide safer means of transportation for farming communities located around waterways.

See also  Failed peace talks: You can’t dictate terms to Iran – Javad Zarif to US

“This tragedy highlights the urgent need for safer means of transportation for our farming communities. No farmer should have to risk his or her life simply to access a farm and provide food for the family,” he said.

Dan’iya called for a comprehensive assessment of waterways in the state, provision of properly regulated boats and life jackets, training of boat operators, emergency response equipment and the construction of bridges or alternative crossings where necessary.

According to him, “The safety and welfare of rural communities must remain a fundamental responsibility of government, especially when citizens are travelling to their farms to produce food and sustain their families.”

He further pledged that an ADC administration in Sokoto would prioritise rural infrastructure, agricultural development and community safety.

Dan’iya extended his condolences to the families of the deceased, the Gorau community, Goronyo Local Government and the people of Sokoto State.

He prayed for the repose of the souls of the victims and urged residents to remain calm and cooperate with emergency responders as the search and rescue operation continues.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending