Connect with us

News

Lagos Assembly backs state police, advances anti-begging bill

Published

on

The Lagos State House of Assembly on Wednesday renewed its push for the establishment of a fully autonomous state police, urging state legislatures across the country to fast-track approval of the constitutional amendment.

The assembly also advanced a bill to outlaw street begging and related activities in Lagos.

The two security-focused measures dominated the plenary as lawmakers argued that decentralised policing and stricter regulation of street begging were critical to addressing rising security concerns across the state.

Presiding over the session, Speaker of the House Mudashiru Obasa described state police as Nigeria’s best opportunity to tackle insecurity, insisting that any constitutional framework establishing the system must grant states operational and administrative independence.

“The initiative remains the most practical solution to the security challenges confronting the country, including kidnapping, banditry and other violent crimes,” Obasa said.

He argued that state police would only be effective if state governments were constitutionally empowered to recruit, screen and appoint personnel familiar with the peculiar security realities of their communities.

According to him, “Any intervention by the Federal Government in the operations of state police should be clearly defined by law and limited strictly to matters that threaten national security.”

Obasa also endorsed the proposal allowing governors to appoint state commissioners of police, subject to confirmation by state houses of assembly, but said legislative oversight should extend beyond that office.

“I also believe appointments of Area Commanders, Zonal Commanders and other senior officers should equally be subjected to confirmation by the respective state houses of assembly,” he said.

See also  Governors convene emergency session, school lockdowns rise due to kidnapping crisis

Responding to concerns that governors could misuse state police for political purposes, the Speaker dismissed the argument as insufficient to derail the reform.

“Similar concerns have always existed regarding the Nigeria Police Force under the Federal Government, yet the institution continues to function. We must not allow such fears to weaken a reform whose primary objective is the protection of lives and property,” he said.

He commended President Bola Tinubu, the National Assembly and other stakeholders for advancing the constitutional amendment process, describing the current effort as a significant milestone towards decentralising policing.

Earlier, while moving the motion, Stephen Ogundipe noted that Section 214 of the 1999 Constitution currently recognises only the Nigeria Police Force, but said ongoing constitutional amendments presented an opportunity to establish state police as part of wider security reforms.

Other lawmakers also backed the proposal, saying Lagos had consistently advocated community policing and had repeatedly called for constitutional changes that would allow states to assume greater responsibility for internal security.

The House simultaneously passed for second reading a bill seeking to prohibit street begging, street urchins and related activities across Lagos, with lawmakers describing the proposed legislation as another important step towards improving public safety.

The proposed law, titled A Bill for a Law to Prohibit Street Begging, Street Urchins and Related Vices in Lagos State and for Connected Purposes, received unanimous support during debate.

Leading discussions, lawmakers argued that criminal elements increasingly exploit street begging as cover for theft, robbery and other offences, particularly in traffic corridors and public spaces.

Contributing to the debate, Desmond Elliot cautioned against treating poverty as a criminal offence.

See also  GNI fire: Three siblings burnt to death to be buried on Jan 14

“We must give this legislation a human face. There should be rehabilitation centres where those taken off the streets can receive care, support and opportunities for reform,” he said.

Elliot added that the eventual establishment of state police would strengthen enforcement of the proposed law.

Deputy Chief Whip David Setonji said weak enforcement had undermined several existing laws and urged that the Lagos State Neighbourhood Safety Corps be included among agencies responsible for implementing the legislation.

Also speaking, Bonu Solomon said the Assembly had enacted numerous laws over the years but often struggled with implementation.

He argued that the bill should address both child and adult begging and also target those who encourage the practice through indiscriminate alms giving.

Majority Leader Noheem Adams described the bill as timely, noting that some northern states and the Federal Capital Territory had already introduced similar measures.

In his remarks, Obasa clarified that the proposed law was not designed to discourage charity but to regulate how assistance reaches vulnerable persons.

“We are not saying people should not give. What we are saying is that the process should be organised in a way that enhances security and restores order,” he said.

The Speaker warned that criminals increasingly disguise themselves as beggars, particularly at night and during traffic congestion, creating security risks for motorists and pedestrians.

He also condemned the growing exploitation of women and children for street begging, describing it as a business operated by individuals who profit from vulnerable people.

According to him, “Government should establish dedicated institutions where members of the public can channel their donations while those removed from the streets receive rehabilitation, welfare support and opportunities for reintegration.”

See also  Workers threaten indefinite strike over wages, insecurity

Obasa further argued that discouraging indiscriminate street giving would reduce organised begging.

“If there is no giver, there will be no beggar,” he said.

While acknowledging concerns about enforcement capacity, he maintained that the absence of existing structures should not prevent the state from enacting the legislation.

He urged the government to establish holding and rehabilitation centres across Lagos to ensure effective implementation, adding that lawmakers still had the opportunity to improve the bill before its final passage.

Following the second reading, the Assembly referred the bill to its Committee on Youth and Social Development, directing the committee to report back within two weeks.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic

Published

on

Russia has issued a stern warning to NATO, stating it is fully prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempts to isolate or cut off Kaliningrad, the heavily militarized Russian exclave bordered by Poland and Lithuania.

In a formal diplomatic document transmitted to NATO, Moscow condemned the alliance’s actions as a “dangerous and reckless course” carrying “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict.” The communication explicitly warned that escalation could trigger “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset.”

“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the note stated.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic
The warning underscores mounting friction over Kaliningrad, a strategic territory slightly larger than Connecticut that serves as a vital Russian military outpost on the Baltic Sea.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova echoed the sentiment online, condemning statements from Western officials which she characterized as manifestations of “Russophobia” and a readiness for war.

“If Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different sort of war – a very short war,” Zakharova wrote, adding a call for European leaders to heed Moscow’s warnings. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the series of diplomatic notes issued across European embassies as necessary reminders directed at “hotheads in Europe.”

See also  Malami, Fagbemi clash over $200m Mambilla settlement

 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte firmly rejected the threats during a defense conference hosted by Euronews in Brussels, reiterating the alliance’s defensive posture and urging Moscow to cease its rhetoric.

“We are a defensive alliance. And stop the nuclear threats. This is absolutely not called for and not helpful,” Rutte said, noting that alliance activities pose no threat to Russian territorial integrity.

When asked if the threat of nuclear deployment in the Baltic region was imminent, Rutte dismissed the prospect: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win against NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.”

Security analysts warn that the situation highlights a dangerous trajectory of mutual miscalculation. Nikolai Sokov, a Vienna-based nuclear analyst and former Russian diplomat, noted that escalating Western support for Ukraine risks pushing both sides past diplomatic thresholds.

“They expect more action, including a blockade of the Baltic Sea—just below the level of war in European calculation, but for them this will be open war. I see a risk of mutual miscalculation,” Sokov observed.

While Western governments continue to accuse Moscow of orchestrating a broader “hybrid war” across Europe through acts of sabotage and cyber interference, allegations that the Kremlin strongly denies, senior defense officials view the latest nuclear posturing as an unprecedented escalation unseen since the Cold War.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Five EU nations plan deportation centres in Africa

Published

on

Five European Union countries are moving ahead with plans to establish centres outside the bloc for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, with the first facility expected to begin operations in Africa in 2027.

German broadcaster DW reports on Thursday that the five countries are working on what they describe as “return hubs” for people who have been ordered to leave the EU.

Rwanda and Uganda have repeatedly been mentioned by diplomatic sources and European media as possible locations, but neither country has been confirmed as the host.

The five countries involved:

1. Greece

Greece is leading the initiative and has indicated that the first return hub could become operational in the second half of 2027.

Its Migration Minister, Thanos Plevris, said an African country had already been selected, although its identity had not been disclosed.

Greece is also expected to assume the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2027.

2. Germany

Germany is part of the five-country group pushing for agreements with countries outside the EU to establish return hubs.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt previously said the group wanted to reach an agreement with third countries that would enable the establishment of the facilities.

Germany has also participated in discussions on the legal framework governing transfers of migrants who have no legal right to remain in the EU.

3. Austria

Austria is the third member of the group pursuing the return-hub arrangement.

Its Interior Minister, Gerhard Karner, has argued that the project could help reduce irregular migration and dangerous journeys to Europe.

See also  Tariff war; FG intervenes as states, Discos’ rift deepens

Austria has separately reached a migration and readmission agreement with Uzbekistan, although that agreement does not itself establish a return hub.

4. Denmark

Denmark has previously explored the possibility of transferring asylum seekers to a third country.

In 2021, Copenhagen passed legislation allowing such arrangements and held negotiations with Rwanda over a reception centre. The talks were suspended in 2023 after legal and logistical difficulties emerged.

Denmark has since shifted towards pursuing third-country arrangements together with other European countries.

5. Netherlands

The Netherlands is the fifth member of the group.

Dutch Migration Minister Bart van den Brink has said the proposed facilities should not be viewed as detention camps, but as places offering migrants who cannot remain in Europe another option while return arrangements are made.

The five countries agreed in September to step up discussions with potential partner countries and work towards establishing the hubs.

Plevris said Greece had selected an African country to host the facility but did not name it publicly.

The five countries, known as the “Group of Five”, have been working on a model under which migrants whose asylum applications have been finally rejected would be transferred to facilities outside the EU while arrangements for their return to their countries of origin are made.

The countries have stressed that the facilities would be open centres rather than detention camps.

Responsibility for people transferred to the hubs would remain with the participating European countries, rather than being handed over to the African host country.

The project is also expected to be financed by the five European countries, while organisations including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration could monitor operations.

See also  Atiku, Presidency clash as Senate rejects fresh probe on Fake PFIPC agency scandal

The plan follows several unsuccessful efforts by European countries to outsource asylum processing or deportation arrangements.

The most prominent was Britain’s Rwanda scheme, under which the Conservative government sought to send asylum seekers arriving irregularly in the UK to Rwanda.

The British Supreme Court ultimately ruled the policy unlawful, citing concerns that people sent to Rwanda faced a real risk of being returned to countries where they could face persecution or inhumane treatment.

Italy has also operated migrant centres in Albania since 2024. Italian courts initially blocked transfers to the centres, while one facility has subsequently been used as a deportation centre for men whose asylum applications were definitively rejected.

The Italian scheme has involved significant costs, with DW reporting that the expenditure is expected to exceed €670m by 2028.

A Reuters report published on September 30 said Rwanda had held preliminary discussions with some EU member states about potentially hosting transferred migrants, but that no agreement had been reached.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk returns to US govt for Pentagon war study

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will make a return to officially advising US President Donald Trump’s government by co-leading what the Pentagon called a study on the future of war.

Musk served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before departing in May 2025, having publicly fallen out with Trump.

In a speech at the Quantico military base, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said “Project Meridian” will be “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare”.

“We are leveraging a unique source of American advantage, one our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists,” Hegseth said.

Musk will be a co-leader of Project Meridian alongside Palmer Luckey, the 34-year-old co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, and Newt Gingrich, the 83-year-old Republican former House speaker.

Musk threw his support behind Trump and helped his return to the White House, but the men later had a high-profile blow-up over the president’s spending legislation.

He later resumed giving to Republican causes, including multimillion-dollar donations to individual candidates and conservative political groups.

Hegseth said the project’s purpose is to “creatively look to the future and identify the domains that we must conquer and capabilities we must master”.

Project members will include hand-picked private sector leaders and subject matter experts from across the innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.

Hegseth said he has directed Project Meridian’s findings to be completed and submitted within 120 days.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Malami, Fagbemi clash over $200m Mambilla settlement
Continue Reading

Trending