Connect with us

News

WFP’s report of looming severe hunger in northern Nigeria raises concern

Published

on

The United Nations agency, the World Food Programme, WFP, last week raised the alarm over an imminent food crisis in northern Nigeria if the government does not make a concerted effort to control the situation.

It warned that the escalating conflict and dwindling humanitarian funding were pushing northern Nigeria into its worst hunger crisis in nearly a decade, with millions of people facing severe and acute food insecurity.

The agency called for immediate financial support, without which hunger would deepen further, with more people being displaced and instability spreading across the region.

The warning, contained in the agency’s statement, confirmed the reality on ground, that Nigerians, particularly most northerners are living on edge with tension rising as the economic hardship continues to worsen by the day.

Many Nigerians blame the situation on the worsening insecurity which has prevented farmers from going to farm, with the resultant effect of food shortages, not only in the north but across Nigeria.

According to the WFP, the food security situation had deteriorated faster than previously projected, following the renewed attacks across northern Nigeria, which has continued to displace communities, restrict humanitarian access and cut people off from food assistance.

Recall that in March 2024, the WFP raised a similar alert when it stated that the inflation rate had exceeded 33 percent year-on-year, eroding the frail purchasing power of households in a country, where 38 percent of the citizens live below the poverty line.

In the same vein, the World Bank and the United Nations, had, at different times equally raised concerns about the looming hunger.

In 2021, the World Bank noted that inflation had pushed about seven million Nigerians into poverty in 2020, stressing that Nigeria’s economic growth was being hindered by food inflation, heightened insecurity, unemployment and stalled reforms.

It noted that persistent inflationary pressure was driven largely by accelerating food prices, while the nation’s inflation rate rose steadily throughout 2020 and reached a four-year high in March 2021.

Lead economist for Nigeria and co-author of the report, Marco Hernandez, explained at that time that inflation, especially in food prices, was exacerbating poverty and food insecurity in the country.

Also, the United Nations, in 2022, reported that 70 percent of Nigerians in the North West were living below the poverty line.

The world body bemoaned the spate of the nutrition crisis in the North West region of Nigeria, saying 70 percent of the region’s population lived below the poverty line.

The UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Nigeria, Mr. Matthias Schmale, who made the disclosure said he was in Katsina to get a better understanding of the nutrition and food security situation of the state, describing the nutrition crisis bedeviling children in the region as staggering and worrisome.

He explained that it was traumatising to see how children were suffering because they could not get the right or enough food to eat, saying the situation should be addressed in order to alleviate the plights of the victims.

He, however, noted that insecurity, poverty and lack of knowledge were the driving factors of the nutrition crisis afflicting children in Katsina and the North West region in general.

See also  ICPC defends El-Rufai detention as group hires US lobbyists

But in the latest WFP report, over 17 million people across nine conflict-affected states in northern Nigeria are experiencing crisis, emergency or catastrophic levels of hunger, representing an increase of almost two million people since the previous projections.

The report showed that Borno State remained the hardest hit, with more than three million people acutely food insecure following intensified insurgent attacks and reductions in food assistance.

It added that more than 750,000 people in the state were experiencing severe hunger conditions, while over 10,000 people were facing catastrophic hunger.

The WFP Regional Director for West and Central Africa, Kinday Samba, said the growing geographical spread of insecurity was worsening the humanitarian situation.

“What concerns us most is how this crisis is expanding. For years, insurgent attacks and violence were largely concentrated in parts of Northeast Nigeria.

“Today, they are spreading across a much wider area and forcing people from farmland, driving displacement and restricting humanitarian access, meaning hunger is quick to follow,” he said.

The organisation said worsening insecurity, access constraints and severe funding shortages had significantly reduced its ability to deliver life-saving assistance to vulnerable populations.

It noted that the number of inaccessible locations had doubled, with 15 additional areas now considered partially inaccessible to frontline humanitarian workers.

It emphasised that attacks and illegal checkpoints along major transport routes were disrupting the movement of relief supplies, leaving air transport as the only viable option in many locations.

The agency further disclosed that although the number of food-insecure people across the three Northeastern states had risen to 6.2 million, it currently had resources to assist only 740,000 people, leaving about 5.5 million people, particularly children, without life-saving food and nutrition support.

It noted that the development marked a sharp decline from the 1.3 million people it was able to assist during the peak of the 2025 lean season.

The WFP expressed concern that the suspension of food assistance in some communities due to funding shortages was forcing vulnerable households to adopt desperate survival strategies.

The agency said reports from affected communities indicated that some individuals were joining armed groups in search of food or income, highlighting the growing security risks associated with worsening hunger.

It also warned that the suspension of food assistance in some displacement camps had triggered an alarming increase in exploitation and gender-based violence, with women and children bearing the greatest burden.

“When people lose access to food, the risks of displacement, exploitation and instability increase. Yet, resources are at their lowest at the time they are needed most,” Samba said.

To sustain food and nutrition assistance as well as critical logistics operations across northern Nigeria, WFP said it urgently requires $89 million over the next six months.

The agency warned that without immediate financial support, hunger would deepen further, more people would be displaced and instability would continue to spread across the region.

The report also indicated that the overall number of food-insecure people across Nigeria had risen to 36.2 million, reflecting the growing scale of the country’s humanitarian and food security challenges.

See also  Why we sent Egusi to space – Dr. Oniosun

However, this latest report has again brought to the fore the reality the government and its agencies are running away from and the urgency of the required intervention.

Reactions have continued to trail the report with some people insisting that even with the WFP’s report, Nigerians across board, not only in the north, are aware that acute hunger is lurking around.

Those who hold this view believe that once the producers of food are no longer producing, there is bound to be a shortage of food and when that happens, the result is acute hunger, malnutrition, disease, and ultimately, death.

There are others who are angry that even though the government has failed to provide security so that farmers can go to farm, the government has also failed to provide security for agencies that want to help with food aid.

Others are equally angry that what makes the headlines everyday is how billions and trillions of Naira were mismanaged and squandered by one government official or the other, while the people die of hunger.

One of those who believe that insecurity is the primary cause of the current situation is Dr. Pogu Bitrus, president of the Middle Belt Forum, MBF.

He believes that the government needs to take decisive action against banditry, kidnapping and all forms of criminalities to create enabling environments for farmers to go back to farm, so that there could be enough food to feed Nigerians.

He said that the government needs to reassess some of its economic policies which appear to have contributed more to the people’s economic hardship.

“If possible, see how such policies could be touched to bring about improvement in the citizens’ economic fortunes, and by extension, their standard of living,” he stated.

A policy analyst, James Adedayo also wondered why the government has not been able to restore sanity in the land.

“How can anybody convince me that the Federal Government is not capable of securing Nigeria so much that our farmers cannot go to the farm.

“Look, the government should not play politics with people’s lives. We are talking about people’s existence. Why can’t the government flush out these bandits and terrorists once and for all, and let Nigerians return to their normal lives? Enough of all this nonsense.

“We can feed ourselves. Our farmers are capable of feeding the nation but they must be allowed to do that without fear of being killed or kidnapped,” he stated.

He stressed that the government should create an enabling environment for farmers to do their farm work without fear of being attacked, kidnapped or even killed by bandits and terrorists.

He also wondered why the government cannot assist some agencies with the funds to procure food for some Nigerians that are facing acute and severe hunger.

“And why should agencies like the WFP not have access to hunger-prone areas in the North due to insecurity and the government is keeping quiet?

“I think the government needs to do more than issuing press statements. It needs to take the bull by the horn. It needs to protect Nigerians at all costs,” he added.

See also  Veteran labour activist, Comrade Abiodun Aremu, d!es after hit-and-run in Ota

He expressed worry at the rate food prices keep rising on a daily basis, warning that if the government does not take urgent steps to arrest the development, the situation would spread to other parts of Nigeria.

“It is when farmers go to farm that they can produce food. A situation where bandits, kidnappers, herdsmen and Boko Haram Islamist insurgents have driven farmers away from the farms, without any reaction from any quarter, what do you expect?

“Do you expect manna to fall from heaven in this 21 century? No, that won’t happen. Acute food shortage with its attendant hunger and starvation will be the outcome,” he added.

Adekunle Ajibade, a retired teacher, also contributing to the development argued that since the government had failed to provide security to farmers; a situation that has led to acute food shortage in parts of the North, it should assist agencies that want to help.

“Such assistance should be in the form of finance and security. It should be able to earmark funds for food importation to areas that are facing acute hunger.

“Secondly, the government must also be able to provide security for such agencies to be able to distribute the food items to those that need them.

“A situation where those who want to assist with food and other materials are prevented from reaching the people in need by bandits, terrorists and other criminal gangs, doesn’t speak good about the government. All this nonsense must stop,” he warned.

In his contribution, a real estate agent, Rowland Adebayo, bemoaned the situation in which some people in Nigeria find themselves.

“According to him, after air and water, food is the next most important need of man to survive, wondering why the government should play with such an existential matter as food.

“Do you know that in the hierarchy of man’s need food ranks third in that scale? After air and water, it is food. So, why should any responsible government play politics with such an important part of human existence?

“That’s why some of us believe that this government needs to be changed. Let us try another set of leaders.

“For God’s sake, food should not be a problem to a country like Nigeria that is blessed with abundant human and mineral resources as well as wonderful weather conditions.

“Why should the government allow a few hoodlums who call themselves bandits, terrorists or whatever, to be running riot across Nigeria and preventing our farmers from going to do their farm work?

“How did we descend to this level? I believe the cause of all these problems is politics and it is time Nigerians put aside politics of religion and ethnicity and look for a leader with competence and character to bring us out of this dead wood,” he submitted.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic

Published

on

Russia has issued a stern warning to NATO, stating it is fully prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempts to isolate or cut off Kaliningrad, the heavily militarized Russian exclave bordered by Poland and Lithuania.

In a formal diplomatic document transmitted to NATO, Moscow condemned the alliance’s actions as a “dangerous and reckless course” carrying “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict.” The communication explicitly warned that escalation could trigger “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset.”

“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the note stated.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic
The warning underscores mounting friction over Kaliningrad, a strategic territory slightly larger than Connecticut that serves as a vital Russian military outpost on the Baltic Sea.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova echoed the sentiment online, condemning statements from Western officials which she characterized as manifestations of “Russophobia” and a readiness for war.

“If Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different sort of war – a very short war,” Zakharova wrote, adding a call for European leaders to heed Moscow’s warnings. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the series of diplomatic notes issued across European embassies as necessary reminders directed at “hotheads in Europe.”

See also  We want Ibadan state, Olubadan tells Tinubu

 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte firmly rejected the threats during a defense conference hosted by Euronews in Brussels, reiterating the alliance’s defensive posture and urging Moscow to cease its rhetoric.

“We are a defensive alliance. And stop the nuclear threats. This is absolutely not called for and not helpful,” Rutte said, noting that alliance activities pose no threat to Russian territorial integrity.

When asked if the threat of nuclear deployment in the Baltic region was imminent, Rutte dismissed the prospect: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win against NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.”

Security analysts warn that the situation highlights a dangerous trajectory of mutual miscalculation. Nikolai Sokov, a Vienna-based nuclear analyst and former Russian diplomat, noted that escalating Western support for Ukraine risks pushing both sides past diplomatic thresholds.

“They expect more action, including a blockade of the Baltic Sea—just below the level of war in European calculation, but for them this will be open war. I see a risk of mutual miscalculation,” Sokov observed.

While Western governments continue to accuse Moscow of orchestrating a broader “hybrid war” across Europe through acts of sabotage and cyber interference, allegations that the Kremlin strongly denies, senior defense officials view the latest nuclear posturing as an unprecedented escalation unseen since the Cold War.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Five EU nations plan deportation centres in Africa

Published

on

Five European Union countries are moving ahead with plans to establish centres outside the bloc for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, with the first facility expected to begin operations in Africa in 2027.

German broadcaster DW reports on Thursday that the five countries are working on what they describe as “return hubs” for people who have been ordered to leave the EU.

Rwanda and Uganda have repeatedly been mentioned by diplomatic sources and European media as possible locations, but neither country has been confirmed as the host.

The five countries involved:

1. Greece

Greece is leading the initiative and has indicated that the first return hub could become operational in the second half of 2027.

Its Migration Minister, Thanos Plevris, said an African country had already been selected, although its identity had not been disclosed.

Greece is also expected to assume the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2027.

2. Germany

Germany is part of the five-country group pushing for agreements with countries outside the EU to establish return hubs.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt previously said the group wanted to reach an agreement with third countries that would enable the establishment of the facilities.

Germany has also participated in discussions on the legal framework governing transfers of migrants who have no legal right to remain in the EU.

3. Austria

Austria is the third member of the group pursuing the return-hub arrangement.

Its Interior Minister, Gerhard Karner, has argued that the project could help reduce irregular migration and dangerous journeys to Europe.

See also  Protesters March Against Sunday Igboho’s Iru Ekun Security Outfit In Oyo, Allege Tribal Discrimination

Austria has separately reached a migration and readmission agreement with Uzbekistan, although that agreement does not itself establish a return hub.

4. Denmark

Denmark has previously explored the possibility of transferring asylum seekers to a third country.

In 2021, Copenhagen passed legislation allowing such arrangements and held negotiations with Rwanda over a reception centre. The talks were suspended in 2023 after legal and logistical difficulties emerged.

Denmark has since shifted towards pursuing third-country arrangements together with other European countries.

5. Netherlands

The Netherlands is the fifth member of the group.

Dutch Migration Minister Bart van den Brink has said the proposed facilities should not be viewed as detention camps, but as places offering migrants who cannot remain in Europe another option while return arrangements are made.

The five countries agreed in September to step up discussions with potential partner countries and work towards establishing the hubs.

Plevris said Greece had selected an African country to host the facility but did not name it publicly.

The five countries, known as the “Group of Five”, have been working on a model under which migrants whose asylum applications have been finally rejected would be transferred to facilities outside the EU while arrangements for their return to their countries of origin are made.

The countries have stressed that the facilities would be open centres rather than detention camps.

Responsibility for people transferred to the hubs would remain with the participating European countries, rather than being handed over to the African host country.

The project is also expected to be financed by the five European countries, while organisations including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration could monitor operations.

See also  UNICEF Nigeria welcomes new country representative

The plan follows several unsuccessful efforts by European countries to outsource asylum processing or deportation arrangements.

The most prominent was Britain’s Rwanda scheme, under which the Conservative government sought to send asylum seekers arriving irregularly in the UK to Rwanda.

The British Supreme Court ultimately ruled the policy unlawful, citing concerns that people sent to Rwanda faced a real risk of being returned to countries where they could face persecution or inhumane treatment.

Italy has also operated migrant centres in Albania since 2024. Italian courts initially blocked transfers to the centres, while one facility has subsequently been used as a deportation centre for men whose asylum applications were definitively rejected.

The Italian scheme has involved significant costs, with DW reporting that the expenditure is expected to exceed €670m by 2028.

A Reuters report published on September 30 said Rwanda had held preliminary discussions with some EU member states about potentially hosting transferred migrants, but that no agreement had been reached.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk returns to US govt for Pentagon war study

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will make a return to officially advising US President Donald Trump’s government by co-leading what the Pentagon called a study on the future of war.

Musk served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before departing in May 2025, having publicly fallen out with Trump.

In a speech at the Quantico military base, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said “Project Meridian” will be “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare”.

“We are leveraging a unique source of American advantage, one our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists,” Hegseth said.

Musk will be a co-leader of Project Meridian alongside Palmer Luckey, the 34-year-old co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, and Newt Gingrich, the 83-year-old Republican former House speaker.

Musk threw his support behind Trump and helped his return to the White House, but the men later had a high-profile blow-up over the president’s spending legislation.

He later resumed giving to Republican causes, including multimillion-dollar donations to individual candidates and conservative political groups.

Hegseth said the project’s purpose is to “creatively look to the future and identify the domains that we must conquer and capabilities we must master”.

Project members will include hand-picked private sector leaders and subject matter experts from across the innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.

Hegseth said he has directed Project Meridian’s findings to be completed and submitted within 120 days.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  UN General Assembly votes for Hamas-free Palestinian state
Continue Reading

Trending