Connect with us

Business

Nigeria tops Africa in petrol price surge during US-Iran war

Published

on

Nigeria recorded the sharpest increase in petrol price across Africa during the first half of 2026, with pump prices surging by 39.5 per cent as the Middle East conflict disrupted global crude oil supplies and exposed the country’s vulnerability to external market shocks despite growing domestic refining capacity.

The disclosure was contained in the Nigeria Half-Year Downstream Industry Report (January–June 2026) released on Tuesday by the Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria.

According to the report, the conflict involving Israel, Iran and the United States, which began on February 28, 2026, triggered widespread uncertainty in global oil markets, sending crude oil prices above $100 per barrel and sharply increasing the cost of transporting petroleum products worldwide.

The report explained that the temporary disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz forced oil tankers to abandon the traditional route and sail around the Cape of Good Hope, more than doubling voyage time from about 18 days to nearly 40 days.

MEMAN stated, “During the first half of 2026, severe geopolitical tensions in the Middle East sparked immediate supply anxieties, injecting a heavy risk premium that drove international crude benchmarks past $100/bbl.

“This price surge was quickly compounded as the conflict bottlenecked traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, forcing maritime oil tankers to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope and stretching what is typically an 18-day voyage into a nearly 40-day journey.”

The association said Nigeria’s deregulated petrol market transmitted the global price shock directly to consumers, making the country the hardest hit in Africa.

It said, “Operating under a newly deregulated system, Nigeria experienced an immediate price transmission at the pumps. Data from the height of the crisis revealed that Nigeria recorded a 39.5 per cent gasoline price surge, the sharpest increase across Africa, more than doubling the price jumps seen in regional peers like Egypt (14.3 per cent).”

Despite the sharp rise in prices, the report said the period also marked a significant turning point in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum industry as local refining displaced imported fuel at an unprecedented pace.

See also  Trade minister reveals Nigeria is exploring alternative markets as US tariffs takes effect

According to MEMAN, the expansion of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery significantly reduced Nigeria’s dependence on imported Premium Motor Spirit.

The report stated, “Against the backdrop of this intense price shock, the downstream sector achieved a significant structural shift away from import dependence toward domestic refinery supply, driven primarily by the operational scale-up of the Dangote Refinery, which by the review period accounted for the majority of local PMS supply.”

It added, “Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) local refining share expanded from 38.9 per cent in 2025 to 81.7 per cent over the review period. Concurrently, local units met an average of 64 per cent of diesel demand, while domestic gas processing facilities captured 90.5 per cent of the cooking gas market.”

However, the association warned that increased domestic refining had yet to eliminate Nigeria’s dependence on imported petroleum products. According to the report, local refinery production remained below national demand during critical periods between February and April, forcing regulators to approve fuel imports to prevent shortages.

MEMAN said, “However, the charts also highlight that domestic production alone was still structurally unable to fully bridge national demand, especially during peak periods. This supply-to-consumption deficit became visually evident between February and April, when the national consumption curve systematically crossed above domestic refinery output lines.”

It added, “To prevent severe product stockouts and stabilize the grid, the regulatory framework actively intervened by issuing refined product import licenses to selected marketers, a hybrid supply approach that successfully buffered fuel security during the worst of the international logistical shocks.”

The report further revealed that marketers drastically reduced fuel inventories because of soaring replacement costs, leading to a sharp decline in Nigeria’s strategic fuel reserves.

According to MEMAN, “The high-cost, volatile open-market environment forced aggressive realignments in inventory management across the value chain, as marketers optimized liquidity by drawing down physical buffers rather than holding expensive static wet stocks.”

See also  Failure of Ajaokuta Steel caused by corruption, poor leadership — Economist Oyelaran-Oyeyinka

It added, “This structural shift caused national PMS stock sufficiency to drop progressively from 33 days in January to a low of 16 days by May, falling drastically short of the statutory 30-day safety benchmark, before recovering to roughly 20 days in June as licensed imports began filtering into the system.”

The marketers warned that the rapid depletion of fuel reserves highlighted the need for government-backed strategic petroleum reserves to cushion future global supply disruptions.

The report stated, “The rapid depletion of refined sufficiency days during the global shipping crisis underscored Nigeria’s lack of a resilient buffer, prioritizing the urgent downstream requirement to establish robust, state-backed Strategic Product Reserves and a dedicated Crude Oil Feedstock Reserve to insulate domestic refineries and consumers from sudden external supply chain closures.”

MEMAN also disclosed that persistently high fuel prices forced consumers to cut back on fuel purchases. It stated, “Furthermore, sustained open-market pricing triggered strong consumer demand elasticity, reducing average daily consumption by 22.3 per cent for PMS and 17.5 per cent for AGO.”

The association maintained that while Nigeria’s downstream reforms were beginning to yield results through higher domestic refining capacity, effective regulation would remain essential to sustain competition and protect consumers.

It added, “As domestic refining expands and the downstream sector evolves, sustained regulatory vigilance will remain essential to fostering fair competition, protecting consumers, strengthening investor confidence, and ensuring that the benefits of ongoing reforms are realised across the entire petroleum value chain.”

Under a section titled “Impact of the Middle East Conflict – Strait of Hormuz,” MEMAN said the conflict fundamentally altered global petroleum trade routes after the strategic waterway became temporarily inaccessible.

The report explained that suppliers increasingly shifted cargoes from the Persian Gulf to the U.S. Gulf Coast and West Africa as shipping companies sought safer alternative routes.

According to MEMAN, “The start of the conflict in the Middle East on 28th February 2026 and the subsequent temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz significantly reshaped global crude oil and petroleum product trade flows during the first half of the year. Under normal market conditions, the Gulf serves as the primary export hub for refined petroleum products moving to Europe, Asia and parts of Africa.”

See also  SEC creates insurance recapitalisation desk, pledges 14-day approval

It continued, “However, with access through the Strait severely restricted, cargoes were rerouted to alternative supply sources, particularly from the U.S. Gulf Coast and West Africa. The longer sailing distances, coupled with higher freight and insurance costs, increased delivered product costs and placed additional pressure on global shipping capacity.”

MEMAN further stated, “Under normal conditions, some Gulf-origin cargoes could reach key Asian markets in approximately 18 days via the Strait of Hormuz; however, rerouting around longer alternative routes extended voyage times to nearly 40 days, significantly delaying supply flows and increasing logistical costs. The disruptions reinforced the importance of diversified refining centers and demonstrated the growing strategic role of Atlantic Basin suppliers in maintaining global product availability during supply shocks.”

The first half of 2026 was one of the most volatile periods for Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector since the full deregulation of the petrol market. Pump prices became fully responsive to movements in international crude oil prices, foreign exchange fluctuations, freight costs and supply chain disruptions following the removal of petrol subsidies.

Although the operational expansion of the 700,000-barrels-per-day Dangote Petroleum Refinery substantially reduced Nigeria’s reliance on imported petrol during the review period, local refining capacity was still insufficient to meet peak national demand, prompting the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority to approve imports by selected marketers to maintain energy security.

The report underscores the opportunities and challenges of Nigeria’s transition to a market-driven downstream sector, where increased domestic refining has strengthened supply resilience but global geopolitical events continue to exert a significant influence on domestic fuel prices.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Restoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

Published

on

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  Trade minister reveals Nigeria is exploring alternative markets as US tariffs takes effect

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above N3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about N30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to N60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy, or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy, or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National OrientationRestoring fuel subsidy will reverse Nigeria’s economic gains

The renewed call for the restoration of petrol subsidy under any guise demands a clear-eyed examination of what Nigeria has gained from reform and what the country would have to surrender by reversing course.

See also  Soludo closes Onitsha market for one week, see why

The scale of the problem is important to remember. In 2022, when Nigeria was struggling with declining oil production and weak revenues, the country spent about $10 billion on fuel subsidies. The World Bank also warned that the subsidy was consuming resources that could otherwise have gone into education, healthcare, infrastructure and social protection.

This is the system that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu inherited and boldly decided to change.

At the Federal Government’s recent presentation of “Nigeria’s Reform Scorecard: The Benefits, Costs and Harms Prevented,” the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed that subsidy savings mobilised N15.8tn in resources for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025.

Of this amount, approximately N5.43tn accrued to the Federal Government, N6.52tn to states and N3.88tn to local governments.

It is important to explain these figures honestly. The N15.8tn is not sitting in a government account as a separate pool of cash called “subsidy savings.” It represents resources released within the Federation’s wider fiscal system and made available across the three tiers of government.

The additional resources available to states and local governments have strengthened their capacity to meet salaries and pensions obligations and to invest in infrastructure and essential services, including primary healthcare, basic education, roads and other needs. At the federal level, the broader fiscal space created by the reforms has supported major investments and obligations that would have been considerably more difficult to sustain under the old subsidy regime.

The Federal Government’s Reform Scorecard records approximately N6.47tn in additional expenditure on strategic infrastructure, covering major investments in transport, housing, agriculture, security and other strategic projects. These include major national corridors such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and the Trans-Sahara Superhighway.

The reforms have also made room for significant investments in human capital and social support. Over 10 million Nigerian households have benefited from social transfers. The administration has also extended more than N400bn towards landmark social investment initiatives like the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND (N223.8bn), the MOFI Real Estate Investment Fund, MREIF (N150bn) and the Nigerian Consumer Credit Corporation, CREDICORP (N50bn).

Renewed domestic and foreign investor confidence founded on the reforms has helped make the Nigerian stock market the world’s best-performing in 2026, pushed the external reserves to the highest level in almost 20 years, and helped the country grow oil production to exceed its OPEC quota for the first time in years.

The additional fiscal space has also supported wage adjustments, minimum-wage obligations and pensions, while expanding the capacity for investments in education, healthcare, agriculture, electricity, security and other critical areas of national development.

Nigeria is also entering a new phase in its petroleum sector, with marked expansion in domestic refining capacity. Reversing policy now will undermine this progress and introduce fresh uncertainty for investors at precisely the time Nigeria should be consolidating domestic refining and strengthening energy security.

See also  We want petroleum products at reasonable prices – DAPPMAN

Our Reform Scorecard also assesses the economic harm that the reforms have helped Nigeria avert. Had the subsidy regime remained unaddressed, petrol scarcity would have returned, pushing prices above ₦3,000 per litre on the black market. The legacy Ways and Means financing, which stood at about ₦30 trillion in May 2023 and has since been curtailed, would have doubled to ₦60 trillion or more. The Scorecard projects that, without the reforms, the inherited situation of 27 States unable to reliably pay salaries would undoubtedly have worsened.

There is another important argument being overlooked. Nigeria already carries a second energy subsidy, on electricity consumption, which cost the country an additional N3.14tn between June 2023 and December 2025. This subsidy helps bridge the gap between actual power production costs and the capped tariffs paid by most consumers. Reintroducing a petrol consumption subsidy on top of this would deal a double blow to Nigeria’s fiscal position.

The above illustrates an important point: restoring the subsidy would almost instantly return Nigeria to the economic conditions of 2022, recreating the same fiscal pressures, distortions, scarcity and incentives for arbitrage that made the old system unsustainable in the first place.

We are not claiming that the reforms have solved all of Nigeria’s economic challenges; there is indeed still much work to be done to translate improved fiscal capacity into better services, jobs, infrastructure and living standards. But the proper response to the hardship associated with reform is not to dismantle the reform; it is to accelerate the benefits – which remains what the Tinubu administration is resolutely focused on.

The objective is clear: to move public resources away from subsidising consumption and towards investing in the Nigerian people and the productive foundations of lasting prosperity.

This is also why the debate over restoring subsidy must ultimately come down to hard choices. Do we restore petrol subsidy, or sustain student loans and consumer credit for young Nigerians? Do we restore subsidy or preserve higher allocations to states and local governments? Do we restore subsidy or continue funding roads, rail, power and security? Do we restore subsidy, or strengthen the fiscal capacity required to expand healthcare, education and social protection for vulnerable Nigerians?

It is equally significant that the Organised Private Sector and the wider economic community have cautioned against reversing the reform, recognising that fiscal sustainability, policy stability and a competitive downstream petroleum sector are essential to investment, job creation and economic growth.

Nigeria cannot build tomorrow’s economy by returning to yesterday’s unsustainable subsidy regime. We have moved beyond that model.

We do not downplay or deny the challenges associated with subsidy removal and other major reforms. President Bola Tinubu and his administration are daily working – and succeeding – at translating these sacrifices into improved living standards, stronger public services and greater economic opportunities for the Nigerian people.

Idris is the Minister of Information and National Orientation.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Dangote refinery expands free fuel delivery to four states

Published

on

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery says it has expanded its free petroleum products delivery initiative to Kano, Imo, Anambra and Nasarawa states, a move it says is expected to reduce distribution costs for independent petroleum marketers and create room for lower petrol prices.

According to a statement on Sunday, the initiative, which initially covered Lagos, Ogun, Rivers, Kaduna, Abuja and Delta states, is designed to bring petroleum products closer to marketers and retailers while eliminating the cost of transporting products over long distances from the refinery to different parts of the country.

By absorbing delivery costs, the refinery is reducing one of the major expenses embedded in the downstream petroleum products distribution chain.

Group Executive Director, Commercial Operations, Oil & Gas, WAEP and Fertiliser, Dangote Industries Limited, Fatima Aliko Dangote, said the initiative was aimed at ensuring that the benefits of domestic refining translated into savings for businesses and consumers.

“The value of domestic refining must ultimately be felt beyond the refinery gate. By absorbing the cost of delivering petroleum products to our customers, we are removing a significant component of the distribution burden and creating room for those savings to flow through the value chain to consumers. Our goal is to make fuel distribution more efficient, reduce avoidable costs and support more competitive pump prices across Nigeria.”

The expansion was reportedly welcomed by the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, which said the initiative would reduce some of the financial and logistical pressures confronting independent petroleum marketers and contribute to lower prices for consumers.

See also  Fuel Scarcity Looms As PENGASSAN Declares Nationwide Strike

National Publicity Secretary and Public Relations Officer of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, was quoted as saying that the initiative addressed a longstanding challenge in the petroleum products distribution chain, where marketers commit substantial funds to product purchases and may then wait for extended periods before their orders are loaded and transported.

“This gesture, if sustained, will be able to alleviate the sufferings of independent marketers. There has been the issue of financial hold-up, whereby marketers pay for products and are not loaded for days and weeks, and they suffer unnecessary hardship bringing the product down,” he stated.

According to him, the refinery’s delivery arrangement reduces the period for which marketers’ funds remain tied up, improves cash flow and allows businesses to deploy their capital more efficiently.

Dangote said the reduction in distribution costs is particularly significant for marketers supplying areas far from the refinery, as the transportation of petroleum products over long distances attracts additional expenses associated with haulage, vehicle operations, driver costs, insurance, road risks and other logistics.

It was stated that removing or reducing such costs could improve the economics of supplying distant markets and provide marketers with greater room to compete on retail prices.

The initiative also reduces the operational risks associated with moving large volumes of petroleum products over long distances by taking products closer to their destination markets.

The expansion comes as Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector continues to adjust to increased domestic refining capacity and a more competitive market environment.

The Dangote refinery, with a capacity of 700,000 barrels per day, has been supplying refined petroleum products to the domestic market while also expanding its presence in international markets.

Continue Reading

Business

Banks account for 92% of NFIU suspicious reports

Published

on

The Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit has disclosed that banks, fintech companies and other reporting entities submitted 42,082 Suspicious Transaction Reports to the agency in 2025.

The figure was contained in the NFIU’s 2025 Annual Report, which highlighted continued risks to Nigeria’s financial system and increased regulatory monitoring of transactions.

The agency also received 41,716,214 Currency Transaction Reports and 10,513 Suspicious Activity Reports during the year.

“During the review period, the NFIU received a total of 41,716,214 CTRs, 42,082 STRs, and 10,513 SARs,” the report stated.

The NFIU said its reporting framework covers threshold-based transactions, suspicious transactions and activities, as well as regulatory submissions relating to anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing and counter-proliferation financing compliance.

It noted that it collaborates with the Central Bank of Nigeria, National Insurance Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering to ensure that reporting entities comply with applicable regulations.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for the bulk of STR filings, submitting 38,715 reports, representing about 92 per cent of the total received from the various sectors.

Other Financial Institutions submitted 2,185 STRs, while Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions accounted for 1,029. Capital market operators and insurance companies filed 104 reports, while Virtual Asset Service Providers, including cryptocurrency-related businesses, submitted 49.

Banks also dominated Suspicious Activity Reports, contributing 8,313 of the 10,513 filings recorded in 2025. Other Financial Institutions accounted for 1,816, capital market and insurance companies filed 295, while Virtual Asset Service Providers submitted 89. The DNFBP sector recorded no SAR during the year.

See also  We want petroleum products at reasonable prices – DAPPMAN

The report further showed that financial institutions filed more than 41.7 million Currency Transaction Reports. Deposit Money Banks accounted for 37,214,139 filings, equivalent to about 89.2 per cent of the total, while Other Financial Institutions submitted 4,212,466.

Capital market operators and insurance companies contributed 289,296 CTRs, while Virtual Asset Service Providers filed 313.

According to the NFIU, Section 11 of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act requires financial institutions to report transactions exceeding N5m for individuals and N10m for legal entities within seven days.

The agency added that Section 3(1) of the law mandates the reporting of incoming and outgoing transfers above $10,000 within 24 hours.

Data from the four quarters showed a steady rise in STR filings by banks. Reports increased from 9,134 in the first quarter to 9,658 in the second, 9,891 in the third and 10,032 in the fourth quarter.

Currency Transaction Reports from Deposit Money Banks followed a similar upward trend, rising from 7,040,493 in the first quarter to 8,197,292 in the second, 10,885,247 in the third and 11,091,107 in the fourth quarter.

Among Other Financial Institutions, STR filings stood at 451 in the first quarter and 432 in the second before climbing to 719 in the third and falling to 583 in the fourth.

The NFIU also reported increased activity among Virtual Asset Service Providers. The sector recorded no STRs during the first half of 2025 but filed 17 in the third quarter and 32 in the fourth quarter.

VASPs also submitted 28 SARs in the first quarter, 12 in the second, 24 in the third and 25 in the fourth. Their CTR filings emerged in the second half of the year, with 103 reports in the third quarter and 210 in the fourth.

See also  Trade minister reveals Nigeria is exploring alternative markets as US tariffs takes effect

The agency disclosed that reporting entities submitted 28,133,909 reports involving Politically Exposed Persons during 2025.

Deposit Money Banks accounted for most of the PEP filings, recording 7,263,557 in the first quarter, 5,658,079 in the second, 6,235,585 in the third and 8,225,572 in the fourth.

Other Financial Institutions recorded a significant increase in PEP reports, rising from just 12 in the first quarter to 617,286 in the fourth quarter. Capital market and insurance institutions submitted 28,561 reports, while VASPs recorded none.

The NFIU also disclosed that its Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions Division conducted joint on-site examinations of 29 reporting entities in the Federal Capital Territory.

The entities were drawn from the real estate, casino, precious metals and stones dealing, and consultancy sectors.

According to the report, the exercise resulted in 20 new registrations on the RapidAML portal and subscriptions to NIGSAC, alongside the submission of 1,029 Suspicious Transaction Reports.

Despite the increased compliance activity, the number of STRs received in 2025 was significantly lower than the previous year. STR filings fell by 40,061, from 82,143 in 2024 to 42,082 in 2025, representing a decline of about 48.8 per cent.

Suspicious Activity Reports also dropped by 12,851, from 23,364 in 2024 to 10,513 in 2025, representing a reduction of approximately 55 per cent.

The contrasting figures indicate that while reporting entities recorded significantly higher volumes of threshold-based transactions and PEP disclosures in 2025, suspicious transaction and activity reports declined sharply compared with the previous year.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending