Connect with us

Politics

Anambra govt counters Obi, alleges N127bn, $124m debt

Published

on

The Anambra State Government has said the administration of former Governor Peter Obi left unpaid loans from eight different external borrowings as of the time he left office on March 17, 2014, adding that as of June 30, 2026, the total balance of such loans left by Obi at the official exchange rate stood at N127.4 billion.

The Commissioner for Information and Value Reformation, Dr Law Mefor, disclosed this in a press statement in Awka on Wednesday, while responding to claims Obi made that he did not leave any unpaid loan in the state.

Mefor said the state summarised the latest report from the Debt Management Office on Anambra’s debt status (as of June 2026), indicating the dates the loans were signed and the balance remaining.

He explained that, from the evidence, Obi borrowed for malaria, erosion control, education, healthcare, etc and so far, the current government was repaying hundreds of millions of naira every month to service these debts, though it said it was not complaining.

He added that the clarification became necessary to set the record straight.

Recall that Obi, who is also the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, had challenged the earlier claims of “unpaid loans” by the Anambra State Government on his record while in office, insisting he owed no one in pensions, salaries or contract jobs done.

He also challenged that if there are proofs, he will stop campaigning.

The NDC presidential candidate also rejected claims by the Anambra State Government that his administration left behind inherited debts, including a N2bn ecological loan, contractor liabilities and unpaid salaries, gratuities and pensions.

Obi, in a statement on X on Tuesday, described the claims as “completely false,” saying his administration had cleared more than N35bn in historical gratuities and arrears and handed over the state without outstanding salary, pension or gratuity obligations.

He said, “We systematically liquidated historical gratuities and arrears dating back several years, amounting to over N35bn.

“At the point of handover, the state owed nothing in salaries, gratuities, or pensions, nor did we owe anything to any contractor for projects duly executed and certified,” he added.

Obi also specifically disputed the claim concerning the N2bn ecological fund, explaining that the money was released shortly before he left office for the Oko/Umuchiana erosion crisis.

According to Obi, the money was left untouched in a First Bank account in UNIZIK, Awka Branch.

He also vowed to quit the 2027 presidential race if the state government showed evidence that he left debts or owed any contractor.

But reacting to Obi’s claims in the series of documents, Mefor said Obi owed verified salaries, gratuity, and pension to retired teachers and staff of the water corporation, adding that the former governor left a state without any functioning urban or rural water schemes; increasing insecurity and increased poverty, ostensibly dead public schools and dead public hospitals with grossly inadequate teachers and medical personnel.

On the ecological funds, Mefor said Obi blatantly lied about any ecological fund account or deposit with the First Bank of Nigeria, UNIZIK branch, Awka, and wondered how the former governor invented the N2bn ecological fund matter and went ahead to fabricate lies about it.

See also  Senator protests result of Kogi APC senatorial primaries

Mefor insisted that the account in question is an “Internally Generated Revenue – Consolidated Revenue Account”, and not an ecological fund account as claimed by Obi, adding that from 2011, when the account was opened to date, there has never been any such amount, whether as inflow or balance, in the account.

The document was titled, ‘Gov Peter Obi and Record of Public Debt in Anambra: Facts Beyond Propaganda and Lies’.

It read, “Our attention has been drawn to a viral post by a former Governor of Anambra, HE Mr Peter Obi, CON, on what he described as ‘Phantom Debts and Ecological Loan Fallacy’, which presumably was in response to some statements in a podcast by the Anambra State Commissioner for Finance.

“We understand that this is a campaign season and candidates often go to the extremes to impress. If not for the fact that the said post was on his personal handle, we would not have believed that he could have made such wild and verifiably false claims.

“As a government, we are focused 100 per cent on delivering dividends of democracy to millions of Ndi Anambra. However, when a former governor of the state makes some outlandish claims about the state of public debt he left behind, and especially when the present government has been spending billions of Naira servicing the same debt, a responsible government owes the public a response in the interest of transparency and accountability.

“We have no time to join issues. We will simply state the facts here for the record, and they are:

“Fact 1: HE Peter Obi Spent about $4.05 billion (equivalent to N5.4 trillion at the current exchange rate) in eight years and also contracted $123.77 million in external debt alone, for which our government has so far paid billions of Naira in service payments.

“Fact 2: As of the date HE Peter Obi left office (17th March 2014), there were and still are eight different external borrowings his administration left for his successors.

“As of June 30, 2026, the total balance of such loans left by HE Peter Obi at the official exchange rate stood at N127.4 billion. Here we summarise the latest report from the Debt Management Office on Anambra’s debt status (as of June 2026), indicating the dates the loans were signed and the balance remaining.

“Fact No. 3: HE Peter Obi owed verified salaries, gratuity, and pension to retired teachers and staff of Water Corporation

Fact No.4: HE Peter Obi blatantly lied about any Ecological Fund account or deposit with the First Bank of Nigeria, UNIZIK branch, Awka. In the podcast by the Commissioner for Finance, he never mentioned any N2bn ecological fund loan. The video is there. Where did HE Peter Obi invent the N2bn ecological fund matter and go ahead to fabricate lies about it?”

Reacting to Obi’s claim on clearing all inherited arrears of pensions, salaries and gratuities, the government said, “HE Peter Obi made very strong statements about clearing all inherited arrears of pensions, salaries and gratuities. That claim is patently false. We do not want to get into the debate between him and his predecessors regarding which arrears were paid by them or by him.

See also  Ganduje and Yusuf meet, call for unity

“Our administration has cleared about N22 billion in inherited gratuity arrears of retired state and local government employees and teachers. However, there are still legacy arrears which have lingered since the time of HE Peter Obi.

“First, there are arrears of salaries to staff of defunct Water Corporation, which lingered throughout Peter Obi’s tenure, culminating in court processes and judgments. It is this administration that has negotiated a settlement and already paid the first two instalments of the agreed three instalment payments.

“Second, there are arrears of salaries, pensions and gratuities owed to primary school teachers under the local government system during Gov Mbadinuju’s tenure.

“The attention of our administration has recently been drawn to these lingering arrears. We have been informed that the government of Peter Obi verified and certified the debt of 16 months of salary arrears and agreed to pay in tranches.

“It only paid five months and no more until today. This administration has set up a committee headed by the Head of Service to finalise a new verification for us to pay.

“So, Your Excellency Peter Obi, you owed salaries, pensions and gratuities. Many of these people are still alive and can testify. It is not good to speak loudly without facts or with fabricated figures.

“How can you say that if we show one person that you owed, you will quit your 2027 presidential campaign? No, we don’t want you to quit, and we wish you well. But you obviously lied: you owed many, not one, and those debts are yet to be fully cleared even today.”

The statement continued, “HE Peter Obi wrote without any equivocation that as at the date he left office, March 17, 2014, he left the ‘balance of over N2.13 billion in a First Bank Account No.2018779464, UNIZIK branch, Awka’. He subsequently charged that if the claim is found to be false, he ‘would stop campaigning’.

“Well, we have obtained a certified printout of the said account from inception to date. First, the account is an Internally Generated Revenue – Consolidated Revenue Account, and not an ecological fund account. Second, from 2011, when the account was opened to date, there has never been any such amount—whether as inflow or balance—in the account.

“Since Peter Obi raised the issue and admitted that his government received such an amount, and it is evident that no such amount ever entered into the account that he cited, it behoves Peter Obi to tell us where exactly his government kept the money or is the money missing?

“There must be something about this N2.13bn that he should bring up even when it was never mentioned by the Hon. Commissioner. Curious!”

According to him, the issue was not whether or not borrowing is good, as no business or government can scale significantly without some debt.

See also  Primaries aftermath: Obi rallies NDC aspirants for unity

He added, “Yes, we converted the audited and published expenditures using the average official exchange rates during the eight years of HE Peter Obi, and they sum to about US$4.05 billion.

“At the current official exchange rate, it would sum to about N5.4 trillion, and he surely governed to the best of his ability. Of course, no government will ever finish the work of development.

“We are convinced that many Ndi Anambra would not have minded if HE Peter Obi had borrowed to fix public schools and hospitals, water schemes, infrastructure, or even to reduce poverty and insecurity.

“Debt, especially for bankable projects and human capital development, is justifiable. So, HE Peter Obi should stop being irked as if all debt is bad.

“Finally, we do not wish to be drawn into the nebulous creative accounting that generated the phantom N75 billion ‘savings’ or ‘investment’ which the previous administration has vigorously disputed.”

When contacted, Obi’s camp said it was focused on responding to the substantive issues raised by the Anambra State Government.

The camp also described the Presidency as a “meddlesome interloper” for wading into the controversy over the financial liabilities allegedly left behind by Obi’s administration in Anambra State.

Obi’s media aide, Idris Zekeri Jnr, in an exclusive phone interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday, said a team of former officials who worked with Obi as governor was preparing a detailed response to the claims made by the Anambra State Government.

The development followed the intervention of the Presidency in the dispute after the Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, challenged Obi to withdraw from the 2027 presidential race if his claim that he left Anambra without outstanding debts was disproved.

Onanuga wrote on X, “Peter Obi claimed he left Anambra with a clean slate of debt and even threatened to quit the presidential race if his claims were proven otherwise.”

He added, “Now, the Anambra government has confronted him with facts and figures showing he owed Water Corporation workers, teachers, and pension and gratuities, and had also borrowed for frivolous things.

“The ball is back in his court. Will he follow through on his threat by quitting the race?” he asked.

Reacting, Zekeri said, “As for the Presidency, they are meddlesome interloper. So, we don’t bother ourselves with them, especially Bayo Onanuga who you referenced. They are just nothing but meddlesome interlopers.”

He said the response being prepared by members of Obi’s former administration would address the issues raised by the state government.

“Concerning the issue raised by the Anambra State government, our team, especially the one that worked with Obi when he was governor, is putting up a detailed reply.

“You will get it as soon as it is ready. This is not a campaign matter. It is a governance issue, and it is going to be addressed. I can assure you that it is nothing to worry about.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Nigerian woman arrested in US for illegally voting in 2022 and 2024 elections

Published

on

A 56-year-old Nigerian woman, Gladys Adaeze Okafor, has been arrested and charged with illegally voting in the 2022 midterm elections in the United States after lying about her citizenship.

United States Attorney Leah B. Foley and Jeff Grimming, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in New England made the announcement in a release issued the Department of Justice on Wednesday, September 16, 2026.

The Defendant residing in Lynn, Massachusets, Boston, also allegedly voted in the 2024 Presidential primary election.

Okafor, is charged with unlawfully voting as an alien.

The defendant was arrested on Wednesday morning.

She is expected to appear in federal court in Boston on the same day.

According to the charging documents, Okafor is a citizen of Nigeria who was born in Aba, Abia State.

Okafor obtained lawful permanent resident status in December 2022 but is not a U.S. citizen and has not applied for U.S. citizenship.

In July 2022, Okafor allegedly submitted a voter registration card, signing her name under a certification which provided “I AM A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES … Signed under penalty of perjury.”

The City of Lynn subsequently registered her to vote, and Okafor allegedly voted in the midterm elections that fall.

It is further alleged that Okafor submitted a second voter registration form in October of 2023, checking the “U.S. Citizen” box and signing under the U.S. citizen certification. Okafor allegedly voted in the 2024 presidential primary election.

The charge of unlawful voting as an alien provides for a sentence of up to one year in prison, one year of supervised release and a fine of $100,000.

See also  Senator protests result of Kogi APC senatorial primaries

The defendant may be subject to deportation upon completion of any sentence imposed. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Julissa Walsh of the Major Crimes Unit is prosecuting the case.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Utomi leads talks with Atiku, Obi on single candidate ahead of 2027, read details

Published

on

Professor of Political Economy, Pat Utomi, will lead the Movement for Credible Elections in closed-door talks with major opposition presidential candidates as part of efforts to produce a single candidate to challenge President Bola Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress in the 2027 presidential election.

The meetings with the candidates and leaders of their parties are expected to be concluded within two weeks, according to the MCE.

Those expected to be engaged include Atiku Abubakar of the African Democratic Congress, Peter Obi of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Adewole Adebayo of the Social Democratic Party, Seyi Makinde of the Allied People’s Movement, Donald Duke of the People’s Redemption Party, Sandy Onor of the Peoples Democratic Party, Peter Agada of the Young Progressives Party and Omoyele Sowore of the African Action Congress.

The development was disclosed in a statement on Monday by the Media Coordinator of the MCE, James Ezema.

The statement said the Utomi-led Political Commission would hold the meetings behind closed doors to prevent what it described as sabotage by “political mercenaries and jobbers” opposed to the initiative.

It said the engagements were intended to avoid a repeat of previous opposition arrangements in which political actors agreed on the need for a united front but disagreed when it became necessary to select a candidate to lead the alliance.

The statement read, “The Prof Pat Utomi-led Political Commission initiated by Movement for Credible Elections, MCE, to actualise Opposition Coalition for a Single Presidential Candidate in the 2027 Elections has decided to meet shortlisted opposition presidential candidates and their party leaders behind closed doors ahead of its tactical session scheduled to hold in Ibadan in a fortnight.

See also  Primaries aftermath: Obi rallies NDC aspirants for unity

“The rationale for the closed-door engagements, the commission said, is to prevent sabotage from political mercenaries and jobbers opposed to the initiative and determined to frustrate the negotiations and horse-trading amongst the shortlisted presidential candidates.

“Nigeria cannot afford another opposition arrangement in which political actors agree on the need for a united front but disagree when it becomes necessary to determine the arrowhead and rallying point of that electoral alliance.”

MCE said the selection process would be based on credibility, transparency, fairness, due process and a level playing field, stressing that the modalities and terms of endorsement would be agreed upon by all participating candidates and parties.

The movement said the criteria for evaluating the aspirants would include “national acceptability, competence, integrity, leadership profile, political electability, policy orientation, commitment to democratic institutions, capacity to unite the country and ability to work with diverse social interests.”

It added that the process would also consider the candidates’ understanding of Nigerian political and democratic issues, including what it described as the national constitutional question.

MCE said the proposed coalition would be anchored on a clearly articulated national programme that Nigerians could scrutinise before being asked to support any candidate.

“The Nigerian people deserve more than a coalition of political personalities. They deserve a coalition of ideas, competence, values and a coherent ideological programme for national salvation,” it stated.

The movement said the process would produce not only a consensus candidate but also a common democratic and governance agenda to address insecurity, economic hardship, unemployment, poverty, institutional decay, electoral integrity, constitutional reform, education, healthcare, energy and the high cost of governance.

See also  Osun decides: INEC uploads 37 per cent of election results to IReV

It said its role was not to impose a candidate on any political party or aspirant but to facilitate a credible process through which the opposition could arrive at a broadly acceptable political arrangement.

“The ultimate objective would be to offer Nigerians a credible people-oriented governance of the Nigerian opposition and not merely another side of the same coin, and that political negotiation is inevitable in a democratic coalition as those who genuinely seek to present a democratic alternative to Nigerians must be prepared to make personal sacrifices, accommodate others and recognise that no single individual or political party can on their own compete formidably against the party in power.”

The MCE initiative comes against the backdrop of other efforts to bring opposition parties together ahead of the 2027 elections.

In August, a coalition of 100 concerned Nigerians under the banner of G100 called on opposition leaders to bury personal ambitions and negotiate an electoral arrangement built around a single presidential candidate, common programme and strategy.

The G100, in its “Doctrine of a Necessary Democratic Opposition,” specifically appealed to opposition figures including former Vice President Abubakar, Obi, Makinde, Bala Mohammed, Seriake Dickson, Rotimi Amaechi, Rabiu Kwankwaso and Rauf Aregbesola to place national interest above personal ambition.

The group subsequently held consultations with opposition parties, including the ADC, APM, NDC, PDP, PRP and SDP, as part of efforts to establish a framework for cooperation ahead of the 2027 election.

Utomi would be joined in the MCE engagements by Maryam Ciroma, Modupe Adelaja, Solomon Dalung, Uche Onyeagocha, Olusegun Mayegun, Sam Amadi, Mike Iginni, Obongawan Barbara Etim James, Olawale Okunniyi and Dr Adum Ter Alex, among others.

See also  Ganduje and Yusuf meet, call for unity

MCE urged all stakeholders to approach the negotiations with an open mind and put the country’s democratic future ahead of personal interests.

It, however, said every participating presidential candidate and party would be required to commit in advance to respecting the outcome of the process and supporting the coalition’s adopted presidential candidate in the 2027 election.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku gets court nod to serve Tinubu Eligibility suit, read details

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday granted an application by the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Atiku Abubakar, to serve court processes on President Bola Tinubu through the All Progressives Congress.

Justice Inyang Ekwo granted the application while ruling on an ex parte motion filed by Atiku’s counsel, O.T. Omotayo-Ojo, seeking an order for substituted service on the President.

Atiku and his party, ADC, are seeking the disqualification of Tinubu and the APC from participating in the 2027 presidential election over an allegedly forged National Youth Service Corps discharge certificate submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1888/2026, has Tinubu, APC and INEC as the first to third defendants, respectively.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to compel INEC to remove the names of Tinubu and APC from the list of candidates and political parties for the 2027 presidential election.

Moving the motion on Wednesday, Omotayo-Ojo told the court that the application became necessary because the plaintiffs had been unable to effect personal service of the originating summons and other processes on Tinubu.

He, therefore, urged the court to permit the documents to be served on the President through the APC, the second defendant in the suit.

Justice Ekwo granted the application.

Following an undertaking by Omotayo-Ojo, who held the brief of Silas Onu, that the plaintiffs would effect service within seven days, the judge ordered that the processes be served within the period.

The judge subsequently adjourned the suit until September 28 for mention.

See also  Primaries aftermath: Obi rallies NDC aspirants for unity

At the previous proceedings on September 1, Onu had informed the court that the plaintiffs were yet to personally serve Tinubu with the originating summons and had sought an order permitting substituted service.

Meanwhile, Tinubu, the APC and INEC have filed responses challenging the competence of the suit and urging the court to dismiss it.

In a joint counter-affidavit filed on September 9, Tinubu and the APC asked the court to dismiss the suit in its entirety, arguing that it was incompetent and that the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to institute the action.

The first and second defendants denied submitting any forged certificate to INEC for either the 2023 or 2027 presidential elections.

Through the APC Director of Legal Services, Sanusi Samaila, they also averred that they did not submit Form CF001 to INEC for the 2023 or 2027 election as alleged by the plaintiffs.

The defendants further stated that the NYSC had never denied issuing a discharge certificate to Tinubu at the end of his service.

They argued that contrary to paragraph 27 of the affidavit in support of the originating summons, no constitutional provision had been breached and no injustice had been done to the plaintiffs by the submission of the President’s personal particulars to INEC.

In a written address filed alongside their preliminary objection, counsel to Tinubu and the APC, Chief Akin Olujinmi, SAN, argued that the allegation of forgery constituted a criminal allegation which must be proved beyond reasonable doubt under Section 135(1) of the Evidence Act.

Olujinmi argued that the established legal requirement for proving that a certificate was forged was a disclaimer by the institution alleged to have issued it.

See also  Osun decides: INEC uploads 37 per cent of election results to IReV

He cited a previous decision of the Supreme Court, arguing that without evidence from the institution or body purported to have issued a certificate or document, disclaiming its issuance or stating that part of it was not made by it, an allegation of forgery could not be sustained.

He also cited the Supreme Court as holding that “in order to prove forgery, or that a document is forged, two documents must be produced viz: the document from which the forgery was (a) made; and (b) the forgery or the forged document.”

The senior lawyer argued that Atiku and the ADC had produced no evidence from the NYSC Directorate disclaiming the issuance of the discharge certificate to Tinubu.

He consequently described the suit as hypothetical and academic and devoid of real facts.

Olujinmi further argued that the suit was incompetent, being a pre-election matter, and that the plaintiffs lacked the locus standi to challenge Tinubu’s candidacy on the platform of the APC.

He urged the court to uphold the preliminary objection and dismiss the suit.

Similarly, INEC, in its preliminary objection filed on September 7 through its counsel, Dr Alex Izinyon, SAN, challenged the competence of the suit on grounds including statute-bar, lack of locus standi, absence of a reasonable cause of action and abuse of court process.

The electoral commission also argued that the plaintiffs failed to comply with the mandatory written deposition requirement under Paragraph 7(1) of the Federal High Court Pre-Election Practice Directions (Amendment) 2026.

INEC further challenged the propriety of Reliefs 2 and 3 in the originating summons and urged the court to dismiss the suit.

See also  Minister-turned-party boss: Meet APC’s new national chairman, Yilwatda Nentawe

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending