Connect with us

News

Five things to know as Africa hosts its first G20 summit

Published

on

Leaders of the world’s largest economies will meet in Johannesburg on November 22 and 23 for the G20 summit, the first of its kind in Africa.

Here are five things to know about the annual meeting, which is taking place at a time of heightened global instability and tensions between Pretoria and Washington.

– First in Africa –

Founded in 1999, the Group of 20 (G20) leading economies comprises 19 countries and two regional bodies, the European Union and the African Union (AU).

Its rotating presidency will be held by South Africa this year, marking the first time the summit will be in Africa.

G20 members represent 85 per cent of the world’s GDP and about two-thirds of its population.

South Africa is the only member state from the continent, although the AU was admitted as a group in 2023.

– ‘Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability’ –

South Africa lists its priorities for its G20 presidency as strengthening disaster resilience, debt sustainability for low-income countries, financing a “just energy transition”, and harnessing “critical minerals for inclusive growth and sustainable development”.

Its theme is “Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability”.

Ranked by the World Bank as “the world’s most unequal country”, South Africa commissioned an expert team to analyse global wealth inequality and offer solutions to the summit.

The team, led by Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, called for the creation of an intergovernmental panel to tackle the “inequality emergency” that leaves 2.3 billion people hungry worldwide.

– US boycott –

President Donald Trump said this month no US officials would attend the meeting and called South Africa’s presidency a “total disgrace”.

See also  Kwara carnage: Maximising US security intervention

Trump has singled out South Africa for harsh treatment on several issues since he returned to the White House in January, notably making false claims of a “white genocide”.

He has slapped the country with 30 per cent tariffs, the highest in sub-Saharan Africa.

While a US boycott could undermine South Africa’s agenda, Pretoria said the absence was Washington’s “loss”, and it was still looking forward to a successful summit.

Argentine President Javier Milei, a Trump ally, will not attend and is sending his foreign minister.

As in previous meetings, Russian President Vladimir Putin will also not be present.

– Johannesburg in the spotlight –

The G20 leaders’ meeting will be hosted at the Nasrec Expo Centre, South Africa’s largest purpose-built conference venue.

Situated on the edge of the iconic Soweto township and chosen as a symbol of post-apartheid “spatial integration”, the venue hosts large-scale events such as the ruling African National Congress annual convention.

It is also adjacent to the stadium that hosted the 2010 FIFA World Cup final.

The event has brought attention to the plight of the city that was formed in a gold rush in the late 1880s and is now home to around six million people, according to official July estimates.

Home to Africa’s richest square mile, Johannesburg is also scarred by crumbling infrastructure, lack of services, and chronic mismanagement.

President Cyril Ramaphosa lashed out at the disrepair in March and demanded improvements. The African Development Bank in July approved a $139 million loan for upgrades.

– End of a ‘Global South’ run –

See also  Lagos plaza death toll hits five as fire razes another market

South Africa will hand the G20 to the United States, marking the end of a cycle of “Global South” presidencies following those of Brazil, India, and Indonesia.

Trump has said he plans to radically reduce the platform, which has over the years expanded to include multiple working groups and social issues beyond its original financial scope.

The US president has also questioned whether South Africa should “even be in the Gs any more”, raising questions about the G20’s future.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Enough Of Blaming It On His Support For Tinubu – Isbae U Defends Ogogo Amid Cancer Battle

Published

on

Content creator, Isbae U, has come to the defence of veteran Nollywood actor Taiwo Hassan, popularly known as Ogogo, after some Nigerians criticized the actor for his political support for President Bola Tinubu amid his battle with cancer.

It was reports that Ogogo is currently undergoing treatment for stage-four cancer, a development that was recently made public by members of his family.

The news has raised concern among fans, colleagues, and others in the Nigerian entertainment industry.

However, the actor’s health condition also became part of an online political argument after some social media users attempted to connect his illness with his decision to support Tinubu.

The controversy grew after comedian MC Lively shared an old video in which Ogogo publicly declared his support for Tinubu ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

MC Lively later deleted the post after criticism from social media users.

Isbae U reacted to the controversy by asking people to stop using Ogogo’s illness to attack him over his political views.

He called on those who did not have useful information or assistance for the actor to refrain from turning his condition into a political discussion.

The content creator said Ogogo’s political decision should not be used as a reason to mock or blame him while he is dealing with a serious illness.

He wrote on 𝕏: “Ogogo has stage 4 cancer, if you don’t have any necessary information that can help him, then please just pray for him …. Enough of blaming it on him supporting Tinubu, Legend or Not, A human like us is fighting for his life for God sake.”

See also  Ex-Ondo SDP governorship candidate, Akingboye, dies

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Nigeria, 74 others spared as US judge strikes down visa ban

Published

on

A US judge on Friday struck down a Trump administration policy suspending the issuance of immigrant visas to applicants from 75 countries, ruling that the policy exceeded Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s statutory authority.

US District Judge Jeannette Vargas in Manhattan said the policy, announced by the State Department in January, was “patently unlawful” and ran afoul of federal immigration law, which explicitly stripped the secretary of state of authority over consular officers’ processing of immigrant visas.

“The Policy, which categorically ⁠prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme,” she wrote, Reuters reported Saturday.

US President Donald Trump.
US President Donald Trump. Photo: AFP

The State Department’s suspension, which also took effect in January, affected applicants from Latin American countries including Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay; Balkan nations such as Bosnia and Albania; South Asian countries including Pakistan and Bangladesh; and many nations across Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean.

The State Department said applicants from the affected countries were “at a ‌high ⁠risk for becoming a public charge and recourse to local, state and federal government resources in the United States.”

The department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.

Vargas, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by immigrant rights groups Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, along with immigrant-visa applicants and U.S. citizens sponsoring family members from the designated countries.

President Donald Trump has pursued an aggressive immigration crackdown that he says is aimed at improving domestic security.

See also  Turkey probes Israel’s arrest of 24 citizens in international waters

Rights groups say the crackdown has violated free speech and due process rights and created an unsafe environment, particularly for ethnic minorities, who have raised concerns about racial profiling.

A check from National Law Immigration Center listed the country below.

What Are the 75 Countries Listed in the Ban?

In alphabetical order, they are: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, and Yemen.

Why These 75 Countries?

Without citing any facts, the Trump administration claims that people from these countries are more likely than others to “extract wealth” or “take welfare and public benefits” from the United States. The pattern is hard to miss: every single one of the 75 countries listed are in Africa, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe, countries with populations that are mostly nonwhite or that include significant ethnic minorities.

Are Immigrants Even Eligible to Receive Public Benefits?

Many immigrants are not eligible for various forms of government assistance until years after they arrive, or until they become U.S. Citizens. Immigrants may be able to receive services in some states, and Congress decided that all residents should be able to receive certain emergency services and access to critical public programs. Many immigrants do not enroll in government benefits even when they are eligible. Immigrants pay state, local, and federal taxes that help fund the services used by all U.S. residents, including U.S. citizens. Their work and spending helps the U.S. economy grow.

See also  Shoot anyone with illegal firearms, IG orders police

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

They Can’t Ignore Presidential Order – EFCC Unfreezes Osun Government Accounts

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has lifted the restriction on the Osun State Government’s bank accounts following an order by President Bola Tinubu.

It was reports that the accounts, held by First Bank of Nigeria and Zenith Bank, were frozen earlier in August as part of an investigation into the alleged misuse of public funds in the state.

Checks by Saturday Punch showed that the accounts had resumed normal operations.

The EFCC issued a Post No Debit instruction on the accounts on August 5.

The commission said the action was connected to an investigation that began in March 2026 over the alleged handling of about ₦11bn in Ecology Funds, Intervention Funds and allocations received from the Federation Account Allocation Committee.

The matter later drew the attention of President Tinubu, who ordered the commission to remove the restriction.

The President had described the EFCC action as embarrassing and called for the state accounts to be reopened.

Following his victory in the election, Adeleke also instructed the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Oluwole Jimi-Bada, SAN, to withdraw the legal action filed against the EFCC over the restriction on the accounts.

Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Temitope Ajayi, confirmed that the restriction had been removed.

According to him, the EFCC acted on the President’s directive and the accounts were reopened immediately.

“The lien has been lifted. EFCC cannot ignore the presidential order. I can confirm to you that it was done immediately.

See also  Kwara carnage: Maximising US security intervention

“If it was not lifted, the Osun State Government would have made it a campaign issue. The fact that they are not talking about it shows it has been done,” he said.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending