Connect with us

News

INEC pushes back as opposition rejects S’West voter figures

Published

on

Two opposition political parties, the African Democratic Congress and the Labour Party have queried the authenticity of the claim by the Independent National Electoral Commission that the South-West accounted for the highest percentage of the pre-registration numbers in its ongoing Continuous Voter Registration exercise.

The electoral umpire, however, dismissed the claims as unfounded, noting it was based on a lack of historical understanding of past voter registration trends.

The ADC in a statement issued on Thursday by its Acting National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, had questioned the registration process in the South West, stressing that the figures from Osun State in particular contradict both historical trends and demographic realities.

According to INEC’s figures, Osun State recorded nearly 400,000 new registered voters, a claim faulted by the ADC which called for a forensic audit of the figures.

“The African Democratic Congress has viewed the first set of data released by the Independent National Electoral Commission on new Continuous Voter registrations with great concern.

“According to INEC’s figures, Osun State alone recorded 393,269 pre-registrations in just one week. To put this in context, Osun added only 275,815 new voters between 2019 and 2023, a period of four years. In other words, Osun has now supposedly registered more people in seven days than it managed to do in an entire electoral cycle of four years.

“Even at its highest point of political mobilisation in 2022, Osun has never produced more than 823,124 votes cast in the Governorship Election. Now, by some miracle, nearly 20 percent of all eligible adults in the state have rushed to register. This is not just unusual, it is statistically implausible.

“The anomalies become even more glaring when viewed in the context of the overall registration report. Across the six geopolitical zones, the South West alone accounts for 848,359 pre-registrations, an astonishing 67 per cent of the national total. By contrast, the entire South East recorded just 1,998 pre-registrations.

“To further illustrate, three states Osun, Lagos, and Ogun make up 54.2 per cent of all pre-registrations in Nigeria, while five states combined Ebonyi, Imo, Enugu, Abia, and Adamawa barely recorded 4,153, or 0.2 per cent, while the entire North East recorded just 6.1 per cent,” the ADC statement read in part.

Speaking in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, the Interim National Publicity Secretary of the Labour Party, Tony Akeni urged Nigerians to be vigilant, saying the claim by INEC should not be taken lightly.

He said, “We are tired of INEC’s shenanigans. Even their claims of having registered prison inmates is an open fraud. They are just giving us advance notice that the forthcoming elections would be as fraudulent or more fraudulent than the past. Nigerians should be vigilant as they go out to register so that we will not see names like Michael Jackson and Donald Trump in our voter register in 2027.”

See also  United States Orders Embassy Staff Out Of Abuja, Flags 23 Nigerian States As Danger Zones

But  the All Progressives Grand Alliance dismissed ADC’s reaction to the South-West figures, noting that the David Mark-led party was simply being alarmist.

Speaking with our correspondent, the National Publicity Secretary of the party, Ejimofor Opara said the credibility of INEC is not in doubt.

He said, “Figures don’t lie. To what extent has the ADC gone to mobilise their members to register across the states of the federation? If the data is showing that there are more newly registered voters  in the South-West than any other geo-political zone, the much we can say is that we don’t have the data with us.

“If we see the data, we can interrogate it. If the body responsible for the registration exercise is saying based on the data available to them, the South-West has more voters in the CVR going on, then, that is what it is. There is a need for circumspection.

“INEC credibility is not in doubt. We believe they will do the right thing by carrying everyone along and capturing them in the process. ADC is just being alarmist. We are mobilising our members to go and register. At the end of the day, the data will speak for itself.”

Reacting to the PVC  figure, the Osun State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party said it could be an indication of the people’s readiness for the coming governorship poll in the state.

The All Progressives Congress on the other hand noted that only the Independent National Electoral Commission could explain how it came about the figures recorded by the state.

The two parties stated these in separate responses to the alarm raised by the ADC regarding Osun’s figures in the CVR exercise.

The Osun APC spokesperson, Mr Kola Olabisi, said since no other organisation can be responsible for the voter registration, the party should not have been asked questions about the figures.

“I want to believe that another person cannot be doing INEC’s work. If there is a proper query, let it be brought up so that people will know that some people are not acting as meddlesome interlopers,” Olabisi said.

Also in reaction to ADC, Osun PDP spokesperson, Oladele Bamiji, said the party would investigate the figures.

He said, “We are all alarmed like any other political party and persons on how INEC came up with the figure, but what we can only say is that the people of Osun are really up for the election. But that is not to say that the figure is not alarming. We are also putting heads together to see what happened.

See also  Ogun PSN seeks recognition of pharmacists’ role in healthcare

“We have our ways of monitoring our people who have not registered before but are registering now. Those who are of voting age and our supporters who are now registering.”

Meanwhile, INEC in a statement issued Thursday by the Chief Press Secretary to the INEC Chairman, Rotimi Oyekanmi, stated, “The attention of the Independent National Electoral Commission  has been drawn to a press statement attributed to the spokesperson of a political party on the data published by the Commission on the online pre-registration of voters.

“In particular, the statement claimed that the number of pre-registrants in Osun State defies “historical patterns and demographic realities.” Nothing can be further from the truth,” the statement read.

INEC reiterated that its online pre-registration portal was launched on August 18, 2025, with in-person registration following on August 25.

Within the first week, 1,379,342 Nigerians had pre-registered online. Osun State recorded the highest number of registrants at 393,269, followed by Lagos State with 222,205, and the Federal Capital Territory with 107,682.

According to Oyekanmi, the current figures are consistent with data from INEC’s 2021 online registration exercise. He noted that within the first 24 hours of the portal’s launch on June 28, 2021, over 59,000 accounts were created.

‘’By the second week, Osun had 154,893 pre-registrants. That figure grew to 232,880 by the third week and 402,619 by the eleventh week. As of April 18, 2022, Osun led all states with 708,782 completed pre-registrations.

“With regard to Osun State, the pattern is similar to what occurred in June 2021 when the Commission launched the online pre-registration for the first time. Within the first 24 hours of launching the portal on 28th June 2021, 59,331 accounts were created.

“By the second week on 12th July 2021, a total of 456,909 accounts were active. Interestingly, Osun state led with 154,893 pre-registrations at the time. In the third week, 752,011 persons had pre-registered and Osun State was at the front with 232,880.

“By the eighth week on 23rd August 2021, 2,215,832 persons had pre-registered with Osun State still leading with 365,412. In the 11th week of the exercise on 13th September 2021, 2,953,094 individuals had pre-registered, with Osun State still in the lead with 402,619. By 18th April 2022, a total of 8,271,647 Nigerians had pre-registered, and Osun was ahead of all States with 708,782 registrations.

“If the party were proactive enough, a simple search of past records already in the public domain would have revealed these facts. The Commission was upfront during the last CVR exercise by releasing the data on a weekly basis, until it was concluded in 2022. Besides, all persons who pre-registered online were required to physically visit a designated centre to complete their registration process during which their biometrics were captured,” Oyekanmi explained.

See also  Tinubu picks Disu for pre-2027 security boost, DIGs to retire

He stressed that INEC has always maintained transparency by publishing weekly updates throughout the 2021/2022 Continuous Voter Registration exercise.

The CPS also clarified that online registrants are still required to complete their registration in person, where biometric data is collected to verify identity and prevent double registration.

“Throughout the last CVR exercise which lasted over four quarters, the commission paused after each quarter to display the preliminary voters’ register for claims and objections, to enable citizens draw attention to any individual not qualified to be on the register.

“At the same time, the Commission applied its robust Automated Biometric Identification System to detect and isolate double registrants,” the statement added.

Oyekanmi highlighted that after the due diligence carried out in the 2019 and 2023 general elections, over 14 million and 9.4 million new voters were added to the National Register, respectively — bringing the total number of registered voters in 2023 to 93,469,008.

“Throughout the last CVR exercise which lasted over four quarters, the Commission paused after each quarter to display the preliminary voters’ register for claims and objections, to enable citizens draw attention to any individual not qualified to be on the register.

“At the same time, the Commission applied its robust Automated Biometric Identification System to detect and isolate double registrants.

“After all the processes and due diligence, over 14 million Nigerians were added to the National Register of Voters for the 2019 General Election, pushing the figure from almost 70 million to 84,004,084 voters. In the same manner, after the 2021/2022 CVR, over 9.4 million new voters were added to the Register, totalling 93,469,008 for the 2023 General Election,” he noted,” the statement read.

INEC assured the public that it will continue to publish timely updates on the ongoing voter registration process and advised against the spread of misinformation.

The CPS added, “While it is not in the commission’s place to develop conjectures on why any state has more registrants than others on our CVR portal, our duty as a commission, which we take seriously, is to ensure that only real persons, who meet the criteria stipulated in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Electoral Act 2022 are allowed to register.

“The commission will continue to make information available to the public on the progress of the current online and in-person CVR.

“We appeal to all well-meaning citizens to be circumspect in going public with information based on sheer conjecture when they can rely on authentic and verifiable data available from our official repositories for both ongoing and historical record of our activities.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Tinubu picks Disu for pre-2027 security boost, DIGs to retire

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Acting Awujale, Abiodun’s aide push for Ijebu State

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Tinubu picks Disu for pre-2027 security boost, DIGs to retire

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Former diplomat Dr Christopher Kolade dies at 92

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Tinubu picks Disu for pre-2027 security boost, DIGs to retire

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Ogun PSN seeks recognition of pharmacists’ role in healthcare

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending