Connect with us

News

FG slammed as medical tourism hits $550m annually

Published

on

The Federal Government has come under criticism as foreign exchange outflow for health-related travel by Nigerians surged to $549.29m in the first nine months of 2025, a 17.96 per cent increase from $465.67m in the same period of 2024, The PUNCH reports.

Analysts and health experts slammed the government for failing to curb medical tourism despite repeated pledges to improve local healthcare infrastructure and reduce dependence on treatment abroad.

The foreign exchange refers to the personal allowance an individual can obtain from the Central Bank of Nigeria for medical travel abroad. While the CBN tracks the FX outflow, it does not monitor how the money is spent.

Analysis of the CBN quarterly statistical bulletin for Q3 2025 shows sustained growth in medical-related travel expenses. Nigerians spent $151.53m in Q1 2025, $189.41m in Q2, and $208.35m in Q3, bringing the nine-month total to $549.29m. By comparison, the same period in 2024 recorded $142.95m, $153.67m, and $169.04m, respectively.

The increase underscores persistent demand for healthcare abroad, particularly for critical treatments such as cardiovascular procedures and other specialised care. Experts say declining trust in local health services and systemic disruptions continue to drive Nigerians with financial means to seek treatment overseas.

A recent high-profile case involved author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, who alleged medical negligence after the death of her 21-month-old son in a Lagos hospital while preparing to get treatment in the United States.

Despite promises to reverse medical tourism, the figures indicate limited progress. In August 2023, the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Pate, pledged to prioritise health security and reduce outward medical travel.

See also  End South-East killings, Amnesty urges FG

In April 2025, he stated Nigeria loses about $2bn annually to medical tourism and emphasised the need to build health sovereignty. Earlier, in February 2025, he highlighted growing inbound medical visits: “People are now beginning to come to Nigeria from the region to receive quality healthcare… including people from faraway places like the United Kingdom and the United States.”

However, the recent FX outflow suggests these claims of reversal have not materialised. Former President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria, Olumide Akintayo, blamed worsening conditions in local health facilities for the spike, pointing to inefficiencies, corruption, and prolonged strikes.

“What the statistics and data you just quoted confirm authoritatively is that the health system has only gotten worse. We have just witnessed the longest-ever strike of health workers in the history of Nigeria — 84 days. When even a ward mate or ambulance driver goes on strike, you destroy the entire value chain. There is no way you can run surgeries effectively, drug procurement is impaired, and diagnostics in laboratories and radiology are disrupted,” Akintayo said.

He also cited mismanagement of drug supply systems and alleged corruption: “Go and probe even the little money that is made available and see how it is utilised. The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission openly declared that Ministries, Departments and Agencies in the health sector were among the most corrupt in Nigeria. That is why those health institutions are not working.”

According to Akintayo, many Nigerians travel abroad for medicines not readily available locally, including cardiovascular drugs, anti-diabetic agents, antibiotics, anti-cancer medicines, and anti-malarials. “The shortages of these drugs push patients to foreign hospitals,” he said, also criticising the handling of the drug revolving fund policy over the years.

See also  Don’t sell your NIN or personal data for N2000 — NIMC warns Nigerians

The rising FX outflow comes amid broader pressures to stabilise Nigeria’s external reserves and the naira.

Nigerian Medical Association President, Prof Bala Audu, noted that most Nigerians seeking FX for medical travel likely pursue treatment for chronic and advanced diseases, particularly advanced cancers. He stressed that the absence of detailed CBN data on the purpose of these travels limits policy responses.

“Without that information, it would be very difficult to proffer a solution. But most likely it will be for chronic debilitating diseases such as different types of advanced cancers,” Audu said.

Audu emphasised that Nigerian doctors are globally competitive, with many recruited abroad, but gaps in equipment and infrastructure constrain treatment availability. “For most treatments that are not available, the competent people to give those treatments are available.

“But what about the equipment? Some of these treatments need certain equipment. Sometimes you have the equipment, but you don’t have the reagents. Sometimes tests have to be sent abroad, even by big private laboratories, because we don’t provide for them,” he said.

He linked the challenges to poor funding, noting that of the 2025 capital budget of N218bn, only N36m was released. “The quality of healthcare we get is reflective of the quality of what we put in. If you provide bicycles, you cannot expect them to fly,” Audu said, drawing an analogy with aviation.

Former NMA President Prof Mike Ogirima expressed concern over the outflow of FX, describing medical tourism as a drain on the country’s foreign reserves.

“That means the country will not be buoyant enough to transact business across the borders easily with the dwindling foreign reserve due to high FX for medical tourism,” he said.

See also  Kidnappers hold 166 Kaduna worshippers, demand N29m deposit

He cited poor equipment and underfunded hospitals as key drivers, noting that the affluent often travel abroad due to better-equipped facilities. “Most of our public hospitals are not equipped to manage sophisticated care, and they lack life support gadgets,” he added, also pointing to the influence of the “Japa” syndrome in escalating medical tourism.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic

Published

on

Russia has issued a stern warning to NATO, stating it is fully prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempts to isolate or cut off Kaliningrad, the heavily militarized Russian exclave bordered by Poland and Lithuania.

In a formal diplomatic document transmitted to NATO, Moscow condemned the alliance’s actions as a “dangerous and reckless course” carrying “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict.” The communication explicitly warned that escalation could trigger “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset.”

“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the note stated.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic
The warning underscores mounting friction over Kaliningrad, a strategic territory slightly larger than Connecticut that serves as a vital Russian military outpost on the Baltic Sea.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova echoed the sentiment online, condemning statements from Western officials which she characterized as manifestations of “Russophobia” and a readiness for war.

“If Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different sort of war – a very short war,” Zakharova wrote, adding a call for European leaders to heed Moscow’s warnings. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the series of diplomatic notes issued across European embassies as necessary reminders directed at “hotheads in Europe.”

See also  US announces drug and terrorism charges against captured Venezuelan President Maduro

 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte firmly rejected the threats during a defense conference hosted by Euronews in Brussels, reiterating the alliance’s defensive posture and urging Moscow to cease its rhetoric.

“We are a defensive alliance. And stop the nuclear threats. This is absolutely not called for and not helpful,” Rutte said, noting that alliance activities pose no threat to Russian territorial integrity.

When asked if the threat of nuclear deployment in the Baltic region was imminent, Rutte dismissed the prospect: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win against NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.”

Security analysts warn that the situation highlights a dangerous trajectory of mutual miscalculation. Nikolai Sokov, a Vienna-based nuclear analyst and former Russian diplomat, noted that escalating Western support for Ukraine risks pushing both sides past diplomatic thresholds.

“They expect more action, including a blockade of the Baltic Sea—just below the level of war in European calculation, but for them this will be open war. I see a risk of mutual miscalculation,” Sokov observed.

While Western governments continue to accuse Moscow of orchestrating a broader “hybrid war” across Europe through acts of sabotage and cyber interference, allegations that the Kremlin strongly denies, senior defense officials view the latest nuclear posturing as an unprecedented escalation unseen since the Cold War.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Five EU nations plan deportation centres in Africa

Published

on

Five European Union countries are moving ahead with plans to establish centres outside the bloc for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, with the first facility expected to begin operations in Africa in 2027.

German broadcaster DW reports on Thursday that the five countries are working on what they describe as “return hubs” for people who have been ordered to leave the EU.

Rwanda and Uganda have repeatedly been mentioned by diplomatic sources and European media as possible locations, but neither country has been confirmed as the host.

The five countries involved:

1. Greece

Greece is leading the initiative and has indicated that the first return hub could become operational in the second half of 2027.

Its Migration Minister, Thanos Plevris, said an African country had already been selected, although its identity had not been disclosed.

Greece is also expected to assume the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2027.

2. Germany

Germany is part of the five-country group pushing for agreements with countries outside the EU to establish return hubs.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt previously said the group wanted to reach an agreement with third countries that would enable the establishment of the facilities.

Germany has also participated in discussions on the legal framework governing transfers of migrants who have no legal right to remain in the EU.

3. Austria

Austria is the third member of the group pursuing the return-hub arrangement.

Its Interior Minister, Gerhard Karner, has argued that the project could help reduce irregular migration and dangerous journeys to Europe.

See also  Night of terror in Zamfara

Austria has separately reached a migration and readmission agreement with Uzbekistan, although that agreement does not itself establish a return hub.

4. Denmark

Denmark has previously explored the possibility of transferring asylum seekers to a third country.

In 2021, Copenhagen passed legislation allowing such arrangements and held negotiations with Rwanda over a reception centre. The talks were suspended in 2023 after legal and logistical difficulties emerged.

Denmark has since shifted towards pursuing third-country arrangements together with other European countries.

5. Netherlands

The Netherlands is the fifth member of the group.

Dutch Migration Minister Bart van den Brink has said the proposed facilities should not be viewed as detention camps, but as places offering migrants who cannot remain in Europe another option while return arrangements are made.

The five countries agreed in September to step up discussions with potential partner countries and work towards establishing the hubs.

Plevris said Greece had selected an African country to host the facility but did not name it publicly.

The five countries, known as the “Group of Five”, have been working on a model under which migrants whose asylum applications have been finally rejected would be transferred to facilities outside the EU while arrangements for their return to their countries of origin are made.

The countries have stressed that the facilities would be open centres rather than detention camps.

Responsibility for people transferred to the hubs would remain with the participating European countries, rather than being handed over to the African host country.

The project is also expected to be financed by the five European countries, while organisations including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration could monitor operations.

See also  End South-East killings, Amnesty urges FG

The plan follows several unsuccessful efforts by European countries to outsource asylum processing or deportation arrangements.

The most prominent was Britain’s Rwanda scheme, under which the Conservative government sought to send asylum seekers arriving irregularly in the UK to Rwanda.

The British Supreme Court ultimately ruled the policy unlawful, citing concerns that people sent to Rwanda faced a real risk of being returned to countries where they could face persecution or inhumane treatment.

Italy has also operated migrant centres in Albania since 2024. Italian courts initially blocked transfers to the centres, while one facility has subsequently been used as a deportation centre for men whose asylum applications were definitively rejected.

The Italian scheme has involved significant costs, with DW reporting that the expenditure is expected to exceed €670m by 2028.

A Reuters report published on September 30 said Rwanda had held preliminary discussions with some EU member states about potentially hosting transferred migrants, but that no agreement had been reached.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk returns to US govt for Pentagon war study

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will make a return to officially advising US President Donald Trump’s government by co-leading what the Pentagon called a study on the future of war.

Musk served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before departing in May 2025, having publicly fallen out with Trump.

In a speech at the Quantico military base, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said “Project Meridian” will be “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare”.

“We are leveraging a unique source of American advantage, one our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists,” Hegseth said.

Musk will be a co-leader of Project Meridian alongside Palmer Luckey, the 34-year-old co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, and Newt Gingrich, the 83-year-old Republican former House speaker.

Musk threw his support behind Trump and helped his return to the White House, but the men later had a high-profile blow-up over the president’s spending legislation.

He later resumed giving to Republican causes, including multimillion-dollar donations to individual candidates and conservative political groups.

Hegseth said the project’s purpose is to “creatively look to the future and identify the domains that we must conquer and capabilities we must master”.

Project members will include hand-picked private sector leaders and subject matter experts from across the innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.

Hegseth said he has directed Project Meridian’s findings to be completed and submitted within 120 days.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  US court rules that most of Trump's tariffs are illegal
Continue Reading

Trending