Connect with us

Crime

Court remands ‘fake’ agency DG in Kuje Prison

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday remanded the embattled Director-General of the purported Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, Adeniyi Adeyemi, in the Kuje Correctional Centre after he pleaded not guilty to an eight-count charge of conspiracy, forgery and impersonation.

Adeyemi, 38, was arraigned before Justice Mohammed Umar following the takeover of the case by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN).

The Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), appeared for the Federal Government.

The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/562/2025, was initially instituted by the Nigeria Police Force against Adeyemi and two other suspects, identified in the charge as Femi and Anu, who are still at large.

After the eight counts were read to him, Adeyemi pleaded not guilty to each of them.

Oyedepo told the court that the AGF had directed the Ministry of Justice to take over the prosecution from the police and that the case file would be reviewed.

He, however, urged the court to accept the existing charge and proceed with the arraignment.

Following Adeyemi’s plea, Oyedepo said the defendant had joined issues with the prosecution and had thereby put himself forward for trial.

He subsequently urged the court to remand Adeyemi in custody, citing the circumstances surrounding his conduct prior to his arrest and arraignment.

Defence counsel, Genesis Francis, however, asked the court to consider his client’s bail application, which he said had already been filed and served on the prosecution.

See also  PHOTOS: Police intercept explosive devices in Oyo, arrest driver

Francis further told the court that Adeyemi had a medical appointment scheduled for Friday over an ailment which he described as contagious.

The prosecution opposed the immediate release of the defendant, with Oyedepo assuring the court that Adeyemi would have access to adequate medical attention while in custody.

He said the correctional facility had medical personnel and facilities capable of attending to the defendant’s needs.

Justice Umar, however, declined to hear the bail application, citing the volume of cases on the court’s cause list.

The judge consequently ordered Adeyemi’s remand in the Kuje Correctional Centre and adjourned the matter until October 12, 2026, for hearing of the bail application and continuation of the substantive trial.

Adeyemi’s arraignment followed a previous failure to appear in court, prompting Justice Umar to issue an arrest warrant after an application by police counsel, Wisdom Madaki.

He was subsequently arrested about 24 hours after the order.

The prosecution alleges that Adeyemi operated the purported council from an office on the second floor of the Federal Secretariat Complex, Phase III, Abuja.

The first count alleges that Adeyemi conspired with the two suspects still at large to forge official documents.

The second count specifically accuses him of forging an appointment letter purportedly issued by President Bola Tinubu and signed by the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila.

He was also accused of forging presidential letterhead papers and documents purportedly emanating from the State House.

Other allegations include the forgery of requests for collaboration with government authorities, land requisition, and office accommodation across the 36 states of the federation.

See also  US court jails Nigerian six years for $5m COVID-19 fraud

The charge further alleges that Adeyemi forged documents relating to staff account approval and the purported take-off of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the PFIPC.

In count five, the prosecution accused him of falsely presenting himself as the Director-General of the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, contrary to Section 179 of the Penal Code.

The case is part of a wider controversy surrounding the purported PFIPC and claims that Adeyemi presented the organisation as a presidentially-backed government body.

The Presidency had denied that the council was an established government agency, while the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission was subsequently directed to investigate the activities surrounding the purported council.

The ICPC later said Adeyemi’s appointment letter was fraudulent and did not originate from the Presidency.

The controversy escalated after Adeyemi alleged that he paid N400m through a middleman as part of a larger arrangement to secure his appointment as the council’s Director-General.

He also accused Gbajabiamila of involvement in the alleged payment arrangement, an allegation the Chief of Staff has denied.

The dispute subsequently generated a separate N15bn suit filed by Gbajabiamila against Adeyemi over alleged bribery.

The police investigation was reportedly triggered by a petition from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President over the activities of persons allegedly forging official appointment letters.

The prosecution has listed several witnesses it intends to call during the trial, including Gbajabiamila, officials of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, police officers and civil servants.

Others listed as witnesses include Paul Emmanuel, Jeremiah Imoukhede, Ituah Sylvester, Akimbo Shola, Adamu Balongu, Ojo Victor, Omeh Amarachukwu and Wakili Saidu, among others. Some are alleged to have worked with Adeyemi at the purported agency.

See also  PHOTOS: Troops uncover bomb planted on Borno road, arrest suspected terrorist logistics suppliers

Adeyemi has denied the allegations against him and pleaded not guilty to all eight counts.

The trial and hearing of his bail application will continue on October 12.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime

Police recover six-month-old baby stolen in Edo and taken to Imo, arrest suspects

Published

on

The Edo State Police Command has recovered a six-month-old baby allegedly stolen in the state and taken to Imo State.

The spokesperson for the command, ASP Eno Ikoedem disclosed this during a press briefing on Wednesday, September 30, 2026.

According to the PPRO, the suspects connected to the abduction were arrested, while investigation into the incident continues.

She added that the baby has since been reunited with the family.

“Operatives of the Gender and Family Unit successfully recovered a six-month-old baby allegedly stolen and taken to Imo State, while suspects connected to the incident were arrested. The child has since been reunited with the family,” Ikoedem stated.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Edo security squad raids, destroys five kidnappers’ camps
Continue Reading

Crime

Navy recovers 80,000 litres of stolen crude, arrests three

Published

on

Personnel of the Nigerian Navy Ship Delta, in a joint operation with the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, have arrested three suspected drug traffickers, recovering illicit substances and approximately 80,000 litres of suspected stolen crude oil.

Information from the security agency said the arrests and seizure were made in two separate anti-crude oil theft joint operations involving the Navy and the NDLEA teams in the Niger Delta creeks between Monday and Tuesday.

The Navy, in a statement, said, “The first operation, which was carried out in Oteghele community, resulted in the discovery of a large dug-out reservoir containing 30,000 litres of crude oil, while the second operation resulted in the discovery of another 50,000 litres of crude oil in the Delta community of Obodo Omadino”.

Personnel of the NNS Delta and the NDLEA also conducted a joint operation against suspected illicit drug activities in the Warri general area and its environs, resulting in the arrest of three suspects and the seizure of 15 kilogrammes of cannabis, some cocaine and crystal meth, among others.

The navy added in the statement, “The suspects and recovered items are presently in custody of the NDLEA for further investigation and necessary action”.

Commenting on the incident, the Commander, NNS-Delta, Commodore Shehu Tasiu, noted that the combined operation demonstrates the Nigerian Navy’s ability to address multiple dimensions of maritime and coastal insecurity, from crude oil theft and illegal petroleum activities to illicit drug trafficking.

While describing the development as a significant operational success in the fight against oil thieves and all forms of criminality in the Niger Delta region, the commander said, “Criminal activities in the NNS Delta operational area, and the entire Niger Delta region, will be met with the best professional method under the Chief of the Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Idi Abbas.”

See also  Edo security squad raids, destroys five kidnappers’ camps

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Crime

Again, court martial defers ruling on Coup trial

Published

on

The General Court Martial sitting over the alleged coup plot involving some military officers has again postponed its ruling on the admissibility of statements made by the accused persons.

The ruling, earlier scheduled for Wednesday, September 30, 2026, has now been fixed for Monday, October 5.

The court is presided over by Air Vice Marshal H.I. Alhaji of the Nigerian Air Force and sits at the Scorpion Officers’ Mess, Asokoro, Abuja.

A notice issued to members of the court and other concerned parties said the sitting earlier adjourned to Wednesday had been postponed.

“The GCM sitting earlier adjourned to Wednesday, 30 September, 2026, has now been postponed to Monday, 5 October, 2026.

“The new sitting is scheduled to commence at 10 am at the Scorpion Officers’ Mess, Asokoro, Abuja,” the notice stated.

The notice, signed by the Liaison Officer, Maj. M.U. Ardo, did not give reasons for the latest postponement but expressed regret over the inconvenience caused.

The latest development marks the fourth time the ruling has been deferred.

The ruling is expected to determine whether statements allegedly obtained from some of the accused officers can be admitted as evidence in the ongoing trial.

The defence had challenged the admissibility of the statements, alleging that some of the officers were coerced by officials of the Defence Intelligence Agency into making or reproducing statements containing information they described as false.

The dispute over the statements led to a trial-within-trial, during which the defence called evidence to challenge the circumstances in which the statements were obtained.

See also  EFCC offers 5% reward for leads on stolen assets abroad

Defence lawyers argued that the statements failed to meet the legal requirements for admissibility.

Among other things, they alleged that lawyers or witnesses chosen by some of the accused were not present when the statements were made.

The defence also questioned the absence of video recordings showing some of the officers writing their statements in the presence of their chosen witnesses, as required under relevant provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

The lawyers further alleged that some of the accused officers were neither properly cautioned nor adequately informed of their rights before making the statements.

The prosecution, however, presented evidence aimed at establishing that the statements were made voluntarily and without improper pressure.

Some of the accused officers gave contrary accounts during the trial-within-a-trial, alleging that they were subjected to coercion, intimidation, inducement and physical abuse while in detention.

According to evidence before the court, some of the officers alleged that they were made to believe that reproducing particular statements would facilitate their release.

They further claimed that some statements had already been prepared by intelligence officials and that they were compelled to copy or sign them despite allegedly not knowing some of the matters contained in the documents.

Some also told the court that they did not personally originate or write the statements attributed to them, alleging that they were forced to reproduce pre-written documents containing claims or admissions they considered false or unrelated to their knowledge.

The ruling on the admissibility of the disputed statements is expected to determine whether the prosecution will be allowed to rely on the statements as part of its evidence in the ongoing proceedings.

See also  Police arrest 10 over assassination attempt on Ondo monarch

The postponement therefore further delays the court’s determination of a key evidentiary dispute in the military trial.

The coup plot trial involves several Nigerian military officers accused of conspiring to overthrow the government of President Bola Tinubu on October 1, 2025.

The case arose from allegations investigated by the military authorities, leading to the officers’ arrest and prosecution before a General Court Martial in Abuja.

The accused officers have denied the allegations, while the trial has featured disputes over the circumstances in which some of their statements were obtained, including defence claims of coercion and other forms of improper treatment.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending