Connect with us

Lifestyle

Ayra Starr visa denial: S’Africa demands proof as Tyla cancels Lagos show

Published

on

The South African government has rejected claims that Nigerian singer Ayra Starr and members of her team were denied visas into the country.

The South African Consul-General to Nigeria, Prof Bobby Moroe, in an interview with Saturday PUNCH on Friday, said immigration authorities had no record of any visa application or rejection involving the singer or her team.

He, however, urged those alleging that visas were denied to submit the names of the affected persons and their visa application reference numbers to enable the mission to verify the claims.

The reaction came after some Nigerians, including former Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole, and the senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, Akpoti-Uduaghan, urged the Federal Government to review visa applications submitted by S’African artistes and their entourages in line with the principle of reciprocity.

“If it is confirmed that our Nigerian artiste Ayra Starr and her team were previously denied entry visas to South Africa, leading to the cancellation of their engagements, then Nigeria should respond with equivalent measures until Nigerian citizens and artistes are accorded fair and respectful treatment,” Akpoti-Uduaghan had said in a statement on Thursday.

Findings by our correspondents showed that in February 2024, Starr and her team were allegedly denied visas to South Africa ahead of the singer’s scheduled performances in Johannesburg and Cape Town.

The organisers of the concerts, Steyn Entertainment, had in a statement attributed the cancellation of the shows to visa denial.

Ayra starr
Ayra starr. Photo credit: Forbes

A statement by the company’s Managing Director, Dale De Ruig, read, “Regrettably, as has happened numerous times with other artistes from West Africa, through no fault of their own, visas were denied despite exploring every avenue possible to secure visas for Ayra Starr and her team.

“We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause those who have already purchased tickets. All previously purchased tickets will be fully refunded within seven business days via Quicket.”

But the South African envoy said there was no proof that any visa application was made.

Speaking with Saturday PUNCH, Moroe said, “The immigration said they were not aware of the application or the rejection. But what will assist us is if the people who are making these allegations will send us the names and reference numbers of Ayra Starr and her team; if they were rejected and why they were rejected, so that we can double-check.”

Efforts by our correspondents to obtain Starr’s reaction were unsuccessful, as an email sent to an address listed on her official Instagram page had yet to receive a response.

Tyla cancels Lagos concert

As the diplomatic row deepened, Grammy-award winning South African singer, Tyla, removed Lagos from the list of places she planned to visit.

See also  Senate bans preaching, hawking in commercial buses, okays N50,000 fine

Tyla had on Monday announced plans to hold a concert in Lagos as part of her world tour itinerary.

The planned stop was expected to be her first headline concert in Nigeria and one of the highlights of the country’s busy “Detty December” season.

However, the announcement of the visit triggered outrage among Nigerians, who criticised her silence in the xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in her country.

Nigerian celebrities and citizens linked the show to ongoing reports of anti-migrant violence in South Africa, including the death of Nigerian national, Chika Ibe, in Cape Town.

Tyla
South African music star Tyla. Photo: Vanguard

Also, social media activist Martins Otse, threatened to mobilise the “Ratel Movement” to physically prevent the concert, declaring, “Tyla’s show will not happen in Nigeria.”

A social media personality, Solomon Buchi, urged his followers to reject the performance, as media personality, Do2dtun, called on the Nigeria Immigration Service to deny Tyla and her team visas.

An online petition seeking to ban Tyla from Nigeria until the xenophobic attacks ceased had gathered thousands of signatures.

But a check on the singer’s official tour website on Friday showed that the December 22 Lagos date had been removed, while dates across Europe, North America, Cape Town and Johannesburg remained on the schedule.

Neither Tyla nor her management issued any public explanation for the change.

The cancellation further fuelled hostility on social media, with many South Africans celebrating her decision.

In a particularly inflammatory post, a South African X user, @Abahambekr, called for Nigerians to leave the Rainbow Nation.

He wrote, “See Nigerians trying to stop Tyla from performing in Lagos during her APOP tour. If that happens, we want each and every Nigerian gone with immediate effect.

“We still have more than 500,000 Nigerians in South Africa. We want all of them gone back to their countries, and we won’t be nice about it. These ungrateful bastards are angry because we don’t want their people to come into our country illegally, to sell drugs in our country and to run businesses that are meant for South Africans according to our law. Now they are trying to attack innocent people who go by the law wherever they go.

“We will make sure there is no Nigerian in our country if Tyla’s show gets cancelled for any reason, and we will see who will cry on social media. We are done being nice and diplomatic.

“We will take the law into our own hands, and every Nigerian in South Africa will suffer the consequences.”

See also  Why I did BBL surgery — Uche Ogbodo

The rhetoric intensified on Friday evening, with another South African X user, @LeslyJohn7, posting, “As they should! SA has one job now; no Nigerian artist should ever perform in SA, period!”

Similarly, @Tyger1960 wrote, “Tyla is good. She removed Lagos from her tour. Now it’s time for SA and Nigeria to accept they don’t like each other and cut all diplomatic ties. Nigerians in SA must go back to Nigeria and South Africans in Nigeria must come back home.”

Another account wrote, “There’s still millions of Nigerians in South Africa… telling Tyla not to come there is risky for your Igbo and Yoruba brothers who are refusing to go home. All hell will break loose!!!”

Similar comments circulated widely on social media, with users calling for the collective expulsion of Nigerians, retaliation against Nigerian artistes, and justifying the hostility on the grounds of illegal immigration and crime.

Ex-envoy knocks South Africa

Speaking on the development, a former Nigerian Consul to Cameroon and Delegate to the World Expo and Economic Development Centre in Paris, Rasheed Akinkuolie, said the removal of Lagos from her tour was inevitable given the current diplomatic tension between Nigeria and South Africa.

According to him, bilateral relations between the two countries would remain strained, making it inappropriate to organise cultural exchanges at this time because of potential security concerns for participants.

“The relationship between Nigeria and South Africa is still very tense and, as such, this is not the appropriate time to stage cultural events in both countries. Participants in such events may be harmed,” he said.

Akinkuolie argued that the South African Government should compensate Nigerians for the loss of lives, businesses and property destroyed during the attacks, saying the matter should be resolved through dialogue and negotiations.

He, however, warned that if South Africa failed to address the issue, Nigeria could consider measures such as the seizure of S’African assets in the country as compensation.

The former diplomat also faulted the manner in which South African authorities handled immigration enforcement, insisting that the exercise could have been carried out in a civilised manner without allowing hoodlums to attack Nigerians and destroy their property.

He disclosed that Nigeria, alongside countries such as Ghana and Zimbabwe, would seek legal redress at the International Criminal Court to deter similar actions against foreign nationals in future.

No formal communication from Tyla – S’African Consul-General

Responding to reports that Lagos had been removed from Tyla’s tour schedule, South African Consul-General Moroe said the mission had yet to receive any formal communication from the organisers regarding the development.

He said, “On Tyla, we have not received any formal complaint or notification from the promoters, although we have also seen reports on social media, so we cannot confirm or deny them.”

See also  Court acquits Abba Kyari of asset non-declaration charge

Moroe maintained that diplomatic relations between Nigeria and South Africa remained cordial despite the recent concerns raised on social media.

“The fact that our President was proactive in requesting that President Bola Tinubu receive South Africa’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation is indicative of South Africa’s willingness to reconcile differences between the two countries.

“The meeting that took place on Monday between the ministers went very well, and we believe it was very productive,” he added.

FG demands compensation for xenophobia victims

Meanwhile, the Federal Government has urged South Africa to take concrete steps to implement the Memorandum of Understanding on the Early Warning Mechanism while renewing its demand for compensation for Nigerians who lost property during the recent wave of xenophobic attacks.

It also called for an end to the recurring attacks on Nigerians living in South Africa, insisting that compensation for victims was non-negotiable.

The demands came as the Nigerian delegation returned to Pretoria following diplomatic engagements aimed at easing tensions between the two countries after the attacks.

A credible source at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who spoke with Saturday PUNCH, said Nigeria expected South Africa to move beyond commitments by activating the Early Warning Mechanism agreed upon by both countries to prevent future attacks and ensure a swift response to emerging threats.

“Nigeria expects action on the Early Warning Mechanism MoU as the delegation returns to Pretoria. Nigeria also looks forward to an end to xenophobic attacks on its nationals resident in South Africa,” the source said.

The source added that the Federal Government was also pursuing compensation for affected Nigerians, insisting that victims deserved restitution for the losses they suffered.

The latest position follows diplomatic engagements that began after a South African delegation led by the country’s Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, Ronald Lamola, arrived in Abuja last Friday on the directive of President Cyril Ramaphosa to meet President Bola Tinubu.

However, Tinubu declined to receive the delegation, prompting it to remain in Abuja over the weekend in a bid to hold the bilateral discussions for which it had travelled.

Following a telephone conversation between Ramaphosa and Tinubu, the Nigerian President directed the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Sola Enikanolaiye, to meet with the South African envoys.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

WHAT YOU DON’T WANT OTHERS TO DO TO YOU, DON’T DO IT TO THEM: WHY DO PEOPLE DEMAND RESPECT BUT REFUSE TO GIVE IT

Published

on

Some people want loyalty but betray others. They demand honesty but live by deception. They expect kindness but treat people with cruelty. So why do we expect others to treat us better when we refuse to treat them the same way?**

There is something deeply disturbing about human behaviour: some people want the best treatment from everyone around them, yet they have no problem making other people’s lives miserable.

They want respect, but they disrespect others. They want loyalty, but they betray those who trust them. They want forgiveness, but they hold grudges. They want people to understand their struggles, but they show no compassion when someone else is going through difficult times.

The biggest problem is that many people have become experts at identifying how others have wronged them while remaining completely blind to the pain they inflict on others.

**Is this not the height of hypocrisy?**

## THE HYPOCRISY OF DEMANDING WHAT YOU CANNOT GIVE

Think about it.

You don’t want anyone to embarrass you in public, yet you find pleasure in humiliating others.

You don’t want anyone to betray your trust, yet you betray people who genuinely believe in you.

You don’t want anyone to lie to you, yet you manipulate the truth whenever it benefits you.

You don’t want anyone to take advantage of your kindness, yet you exploit the kindness of others.

You don’t want anyone to abandon you when you need help, yet you disappear when someone needs you.

See also  Dangote exports 1.66bn litres fuel amid US-Iran tensions

You don’t want people to speak badly about you behind your back, yet you participate in destroying other people’s reputations.

And when someone finally decides to treat you the way you have treated them, suddenly, you become the victim.

**Why should you expect a different standard of treatment when you refuse to practise the same values you demand from others?**

## PEOPLE HAVE FEELINGS TOO — NOT EVERYONE WILL TELL YOU WHEN YOU HURT THEM

One of the most dangerous assumptions people make is believing that someone who remains silent is not hurting.

Some people smile while carrying emotional wounds. Some people pretend everything is fine because they don’t want to explain their pain. Others simply withdraw because they have realised that explaining their feelings to someone who doesn’t care is a waste of time.

Never mistake someone’s silence for weakness.

The person you constantly insult may eventually stop speaking to you. The person whose kindness you repeatedly exploit may eventually walk away. The person you repeatedly disappoint may eventually stop expecting anything from you.

And when that happens, don’t always accuse them of changing.

Sometimes, your behaviour is the reason they changed.

## YOUR ACTIONS SAY MORE ABOUT YOU THAN YOUR WORDS

It is easy to preach about love, respect, kindness, loyalty and humanity.

It is easy to post inspirational quotes about treating people well.

It is easy to condemn wickedness when you are the victim.

But the real test of character is how you treat people when you have power over them, when they cannot offer you anything in return, and when nobody is watching.

See also  Why I did BBL surgery — Uche Ogbodo

Do you respect people who cannot help you financially?

Do you treat workers, cleaners, security guards and vulnerable people with dignity?

Do you keep people’s secrets?

Do you apologise when you are wrong?

Do you consider the emotional consequences of your actions before hurting someone?

These are the questions that reveal genuine character.

## BEFORE YOU HURT SOMEONE, PUT YOURSELF IN THEIR SHOES

Imagine someone treating your mother, father, spouse, children or someone you deeply love the same way you treat other people.

Would you accept it?

Imagine being betrayed by someone you trusted. Imagine being publicly humiliated, manipulated, lied to or emotionally destroyed by someone you considered a friend.

Would you call it acceptable?

If you wouldn’t want it done to you or someone you love, why do you think it is acceptable to do it to another human being?

Nobody is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. But there is a difference between making mistakes and repeatedly hurting people without taking responsibility.

**Being human is not an excuse for treating other human beings like they don’t matter.**

## THE GOLDEN RULE WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET

The principle is simple:

**WHAT YOU DON’T WANT OTHERS TO DO TO YOU, DON’T DO IT TO THEM.**

If you want respect, learn to respect others.

If you want honesty, be honest.

If you want loyalty, demonstrate loyalty.

If you want kindness, show kindness.

If you want forgiveness, learn to forgive.

If you want people to consider your feelings, start considering theirs.

The world would be a much better place if people stopped measuring good behaviour by what they personally receive and started measuring it by what they give.

See also  EFCC recovered N500bn, secured 7,000 convictions under my watch – Tinubu

Remember, you are not the only person with feelings. You are not the only person who deserves respect. And you are certainly not the only person whose heart can be broken.

**Before you make someone cry, ask yourself whether you would be comfortable experiencing the same pain. Before you destroy someone’s peace, ask yourself whether you would accept someone destroying yours.**

Because demanding good treatment while deliberately treating others badly is not strength. It is hypocrisy.

—

## LET’S DEBATE: ARE PEOPLE BECOMING MORE SELFISH?

Why do some people demand respect, honesty, loyalty and kindness when they themselves refuse to offer those same values?

Is it selfishness, hypocrisy, lack of empathy or simply a society that has forgotten the meaning of humanity?

**Do you believe people should treat others exactly the way they want to be treated? Or should everyone simply treat others according to how they are treated?**

Share your thoughts in the comment section. Your opinion matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Bringing You Stories, Issues and Conversations That Matter.*

#Humanity #Respect #Hypocrisy #Kindness #LifeLessons #HumanBehaviour #GoldenRule #Newsbreak365

 

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Sex outside marriage: Saudi court orders 100 lashes for Kenyan woman, read complete story

Published

on

A Saudi Arabian court has sentenced a 40-year-old Kenyan domestic worker, Esther Wanja Muthoni, to 100 lashes for having sex outside marriage after she gave birth to a child in the kingdom.

The sentence, issued in October, followed several court hearings last summer and has left Muthoni fearing for her safety as she struggles to return to Kenya with her one-year-old son, Abudy.

The New York Times reported on Tuesday that Muthoni had been trying for more than a year to leave Saudi Arabia with her child but was unable to do so because of the legal proceedings against her.

“I am so afraid,” she told the newspaper in a telephone interview last month.

“I don’t think I can endure those lashes,” she said.

Muthoni, a mother of five, was working legally as a domestic worker through Maharah Human Resources, a Saudi recruitment company, when she became pregnant following a brief relationship with an Egyptian resident identified only as Mohamud.

She gave birth in August 2025 at staff accommodation. According to court documents reviewed by the newspaper, a supervisor discovered her and took her and the baby to a hospital, after which police detained her for questioning over the pregnancy.

Muthoni told the police that the child’s father had left Saudi Arabia. The court documents did not provide his surname.

Although she was released from police custody, she was reportedly denied access to both her staff accommodation and a shelter.

She subsequently lived at a petrol station in Riyadh that had become a gathering place for migrant mothers hoping to leave the country with their children.

See also  NMDPRA cracks down on filling stations for petrol under-dispensing

The New York Times said its investigation published last year had documented the difficulties faced by East African domestic workers who became pregnant in Saudi Arabia, including the bureaucratic obstacles preventing them from obtaining documents for their children and returning home.

Following the newspaper’s earlier report on Muthoni’s situation, Maharah provided her with accommodation, while the Kenyan Embassy issued documents intended to allow her to leave Saudi Arabia.

However, she remained unable to travel while her criminal case was pending.

The newspaper reported that Muthoni was provided with a court interpreter but had no lawyer during the proceedings. The court documents it reviewed also contained no indication that she had legal representation.

Although indigent defendants in Saudi Arabia are entitled to state-sponsored lawyers, experts told the newspaper that criminal trials sometimes proceed without legal representation, including in some cases carrying the death penalty.

In October, the three-judge panel found Muthoni guilty of having sex outside marriage and imposed the 100 lashes prescribed under its interpretation of Islamic law.

The judgment did not indicate that authorities had pursued the child’s father.

Ekaterina Porras Sivolobova, a labour migration analyst and founder of the non-profit organisation Do Bold, criticised the punishment, saying it violated international human rights standards.

“This sentence of flogging does not align with international human rights standards,” she told the newspaper.

She added that the punishment stripped Muthoni of her dignity instead of protecting a vulnerable woman.

The case has also raised questions about Saudi Arabia’s claims of legal and social reforms, particularly its 2020 announcement of restrictions on flogging.

See also  SOME PEOPLE ARE SO ARROGANT THAT YOU WOULD THINK THEY OWN THE EARTH, CONTROL HEAVEN, AND HAVE SIGNED A CONTRACT NEVER TO DIE!

The New York Times noted that judgments involving morality offences were not routinely published, making it difficult to establish how frequently courts still imposed the punishment.

Saudi Arabia’s judicial system is based on Islamic law, or sharia, but the kingdom does not have a written penal code.

Judges therefore interpret Islamic law in deciding criminal cases, leaving some offences and their punishments open to differing interpretations.

Muthoni did not appeal the judgment, saying she wanted to return home to her other children.

“It is the only way that can take me back home to my children,” she said.

In addition to the lashes, the court sentenced her to one year of banishment. The newspaper reported that Saudi rules generally allow a person sentenced to banishment to be sent to another city in the kingdom when no destination is specified in the judgment.

It remains unclear whether the order means Muthoni will be deported to Kenya. Her exit documents have also expired, leaving uncertainty over how she and her son will return home.

The Saudi and Kenyan governments, as well as representatives of Maharah, did not respond to requests for comment from The New York Times.

The newspaper’s earlier investigation found that East African women recruited to work as domestic workers in Saudi Arabia faced reports of physical abuse, sexual violence, withheld wages and abandonment.

It also reported that some Kenyan women who became pregnant while working in the kingdom struggled to obtain birth certificates for their children, while diplomats who could assist them were accused of neglecting their cases or demanding bribes and sexual favours.

See also  Presidential aide defends Tinubu’s Falcons rewards, cites BBNaija N150m prize money

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Paul McCartney ranks third-richest musician with $1.4bn

Published

on

Former Beatles member Paul McCartney has become a billionaire, with an estimated net worth of $1.4bn, making him the world’s third-richest musician, Forbes has reported.

The 84-year-old British singer-songwriter ranks behind American rapper Jay-Z, whose fortune is estimated at 2bn, according to the publication.

Forbes disclosed this in a report published on Monday, attributing McCartney’s wealth to decades of songwriting, music publishing investments, royalties, touring and property holdings.

Much of his fortune comes from MPL Communications, the music publishing company he established in 1969, shortly before The Beatles broke up.

Through the company, McCartney acquired the publishing rights to thousands of songs, including works by early rock-and-roll musician Buddy Holly and scores from Broadway musicals.

The catalogue also includes several well-known Christmas songs, such as “It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas”, “Blue Christmas” and “Baby, It’s Cold Outside”.

Forbes estimated that MPL is worth at least $`250m and generates tens of millions of dollars in annual revenue from music royalties.

The singer also earns from The Beatles’ music catalogue through the group’s Apple Corps company, which Forbes estimated generates more than $50m annually from streaming, vinyl sales and merchandise.

McCartney, drummer Ringo Starr and the estates of late band members John Lennon and George Harrison each receive a 25 per cent share of the company’s income, according to Forbes.

His share of the songwriting copyrights to The Beatles’ compositions in the United States is also estimated to be worth at least 10m annually.

McCartney’s wealth further includes earnings from decades of international tours, property in the United Kingdom and the Hamptons in the United States, as well as an art collection featuring works by Pablo Picasso and René Magritte.

See also  Murtala Muhammed’s simplicity led to his assassination – Daughter

The singer’s financial success came after an early career in which The Beatles reportedly earned less than one US cent for each album sold under their initial record deal, while music publisher Dick James controlled the copyrights to songs written by the group.

McCartney subsequently established his own publishing company to gain greater control over his music and future royalties.

In a 2017 Forbes essay, he described the group’s early recording agreement as “basically a slave contract”, saying they did not receive a raise despite the success they brought the company.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending