The Oluwo of Iwo, Oba Abdulrosheed Akanbi, has dismissed the long-held claim that Ile-Ife is the cradle of the Yoruba race.
Speaking in a video shared on his Facebook page on Tuesday while conferring a chieftaincy title on one of his subjects, the monarch insisted that the Yoruba people did not originate from Ife, contrary to popular belief.
Flanked by his chiefs, the controversial monarch declared: “Ife is not the origin of the Yoruba race. Those people don’t speak our language. Their language is different. They refer to God as Eledumare, and there is nothing like Eledumare in the Yoruba language. What we have is Olodumare. Ile-Ife has no Yoruba culture.”
The Iwo monarch argued that Ife already had inhabitants before Oduduwa arrived and conquered the city, adding that the language spoken in ancient Ife was distinct from Yoruba.
“Ife people will always say Olofin, and if you ask them what the meaning is, they will tell you it means the owner of the palace. What that means in Yoruba is Alaafin,” he said.
Oba Akanbi described himself as the Arole Olodumare (custodian of the divine mandate), stressing his mission to restore what he called the true history of the Yoruba race.
“Iwo is where you can get the real history that was not even documented. Whatever I am telling you now, you must keep it because death can come anytime. I am not scared of death because it is inevitable,” he added.
The debate over Yoruba origin comes amid recent traditional disputes between prominent monarchs.
Naija News recalls that in August, a clash between the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi, and the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Akeem Owoade, over the conferment of the chieftaincy title Okanlomo of Yorubaland on businessman Dotun Sanusi by the Ooni.
The Alaafin had issued a 48-hour ultimatum demanding that the Ooni revoke the title, insisting no monarch other than him could bestow a title covering all Yorubaland.
But the Ooni’s spokesperson, Moses Olafare, dismissed the threat, saying, “We cannot dignify the ‘undignifyable’ with an official response. We leave the matter to be handled in the public court of opinion… 48 hours my foot!”
Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, has praised Lieutenant Yarima, the naval officer involved in a confrontation with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, over a disputed land in Abuja.
The property is said to belong to former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Awwal Gambo.
Government Promises Protection for Officers on Lawful Duty
Addressing journalists at the National Defence College, Abuja, during a press briefing on the 2026 Armed Forces Remembrance Celebration, Badaru reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to defending military personnel performing their lawful duties.
He said, “At the Ministry and across the Armed Forces, we will always protect our officers performing their duties lawfully. Lieutenant Yarima has acted commendably, and we will ensure his safety.
“We are thoroughly reviewing this matter, and I assure you that any officer performing legitimate duties will receive full protection.”
Viral Video Sparks Public Reactions
Badaru’s comments come after a viral video captured a heated argument between Wike and a naval officer at a construction site in Gaduwa District, Abuja.
In the video, Wike accused the officer of blocking his access to the site, stressing that no one is above the law. The officer, however, maintained that he was following orders from his superiors.
The incident has since generated widespread public debate, with many Nigerians commending the officer’s calmness during the encounter.
A retired Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sunny Anyanwu, has made a generous offer to Lieutenant Ahmad Yerima, the viral naval officer who stood up to FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike.
Notably, Ahmad Yerima has been making headlines following a viral video showing a heated confrontation with FCT Minister Nyesom Wike.
Lieutenant A.M. Yerima
Retired Officer Offers His Pension To Lieutenant Ahmad Yerima
In his Facebook post, the retired Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sunny Anyanwu, revealed he earns a monthly pension of N49,000, and offered N5,000 to the naval officer.
Furthermore, he stressed that Lieutenant Ahmad Yerima should be regarded as a British-trained officer.
Read Post Below…..
Out of my #49k monthly pension, I have decided to offer #5K to the Naval officer that had open confrontation with the FCT minister WIKE.
The officer could be regarded as a British trained officer. I will also advice President Tinubu to honor him with the award of Commander of the Federal Republic (CFR).
His Bank details should be forwarded through his department pls. This is the type of insult I took for 35yrs and gets #49k monthly pension.
The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general elections, Peter Obi, has described the recent altercation between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, and a naval officer in Abuja as an embarrassment coming from a ‘disgraced nation.’
In a statement shared on social media, Obi said the altercation was “yet another unfortunate reflection of the growing institutional disorder in our country.”
According to him, what should have been a routine civic encounter degenerated into “a public spectacle” that exposes deeper governance problems.
He wrote;
‘’Wike versus Naval Officer: A Lesson for National Reflection
The recent needless altercation between the FCT Minister, HE, Barr. Nyesom Wike and a Naval officer are yet another unfortunate reflection of the growing institutional disorder in our country. What should ordinarily be a routine civic encounter has, once again, become a national embarrassment— a typical example coming out of a ‘disgraced country’
Beyond the personalities involved, this incident raises fundamental questions that demand honest national reflection:
Should the military be used for purely civil operations? If proper protocols were in place, should a Minister’s intervention in such a matter be in such an indecorous manner?
Shouldn’t there be clear boundaries between administrative authority and the duties of security agencies?
What does this say about our respect for institutions and the separation of powers? Why are our men and women in uniform so often drawn into civilian disputes? Why has the culture of due process and civility given way to public spectacle and confrontation? If our institutions worked as they should, would tempers flare in situations that should be handled by clear procedure and hierarchy? Above all, what example do incidents like this set for our younger generation about leadership, discipline, and the rule of law?
These are not just questions about one incident – they go to the very heart of how our nation is governed. When public officials act beyond institutional norms, and when security agencies are used in ways that blur their professional boundaries, we weaken both governance and public trust.
We must learn from this episode. It is time to rebuild a nation where institutions are stronger than individuals; where public office is exercised with humility and restraint; where the dignity of our uniformed officers and the rights of every citizen are upheld.
A country that aspires to greatness and feels insulted when referred to as a disgraced nation must replace the culture of impunity with the discipline of law, order, and respect for due process.
Repeatedly, I have maintained that to occupy an office and be referred to as His Excellency, Distinguished or Honourable, how we get to such an office and our character and behaviour while holding it or out of it should reflect such exemplary titles in all ramifications.”