Connect with us

News

Indian Army Places Emergency Order For PULS Rocket Systems As Artillery Recast Into Integrated Strike Formations

Published

on

An emergency order for new rocket systems comes as the Army presses ahead with a wider overhaul of its artillery arm. Together the moves point to a shift towards precision long range strike and integrated formations that are redefining how India plans to fight on land.

In a major boost to India’s deep-strike and precision warfare capabilities, the Indian Army has placed a ₹292 crore emergency procurement order with indigenous defence manufacturer NIBE Limited for ground equipment, accessories and ammunition for its universal rocket launcher systems, even as the Army completes a sweeping transformation of its artillery arm into integrated strike formations.

Together, the twin developments underline a decisive shift in India’s land warfare doctrine: from gun-centric firepower to technology-driven, multi-domain strike capability.

What was the contract with NIBE for?

NIBE Limited informed stock exchanges that it has signed a supply contract with the Ministry of Defence for manufacturing and delivering equipment for Universal Rocket Launcher Systems capable of firing multiple rocket types, including long-range munitions with strike ranges of up to 150 km and 300 km.

According to Army sources, the systems relate to the Israeli-origin PULS (Precise & Universal Launching System), with procurement being executed under the Emergency Procurement (EP) route. Deliveries will be completed in tranches within 12 months.

What is the EP mechanism for procurement?

The EP mechanism, introduced after the 2020 standoff with the Chinese PLA in eastern Ladakh, allows fast-tracked acquisitions to meet urgent operational requirements.

Under current rules, Vice Chiefs of the Army, Navy, and Air Force can clear emergency capital procurements of up to ₹300 crore, enabling the services to rapidly plug critical capability gaps during heightened security situations.

See also  FCTA begins promotion exams for 8,000 workers Tuesday

How does the PULS strengthen Army’s rocket forces?

The PULS-linked order is part of the Army’s long-term plan to significantly strengthen its rocket forces. In June 2025, reports confirmed the raising of two additional regiments of the indigenous Pinaka Multi-Barrel Rocket Launcher (MBRL) system.

In artillery parlance, a regiment consists of three batteries, each operating six launchers, making rocket artillery a central pillar of India’s long-range strike posture.

These rocket units fall under the Regiment of Artillery, raised in 1827 and popularly known as the “God of War,” the Army’s second-largest combat arm after infantry. Traditionally focused on massed gunfire, artillery is now undergoing its most far-reaching reorganisation in a century.

How is the Army raising specialised artillery regiments?

Months after announcing post-Operation Sindoor restructuring, the Ministry of Defence has begun equipping specialised artillery formations, known as Shaktibaan regiments, with loitering ammunition and swarm drones.

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) recently cleared procurement of loitering munitions for these units, which will be forward-deployed along the western front with Pakistan and the northern border with China. The Army plans to raise 25 such regiments.

What are the Shaktibaan regiments?

Unlike conventional artillery, Shaktibaan regiments will not rely on guns. Instead, they will operate loitering ammunition, both long- and medium-range, and swarm drones as primary means of attack, enabling rapid detection, decision-making, and engagement of targets.

Indigenous systems such as the Nagastra loitering munition are already available, while multiple drone swarms have been tested across varied altitudes.

What is the Divyaastra batteries concept?

Complementing Shaktibaan is the Divyaastra concept, created after Operation Sindoor (May 7–10, 2025). Five Divyaastra batteries have already been raised and validated during Exercise Divya Drishti in East Sikkim.

See also  PHOTOS: Navy Takes Action As Personnel Fight Soldiers During Tinubu’s Visit In Bayelsa

These units blend long-range artillery guns, UAV-based surveillance, counter-drone systems, and AI-enabled fusion centres into a single, self-contained strike package.

What are Divyaastra batteries capabilities?

Divyaastra batteries can conduct deep-precision strikes, real-time surveillance, and independent operations. When reconnaissance drones detect enemy positions, data flows instantly into AI-enabled fusion centres, which recommend optimal engagement options — whether gunfire, loitering missile, or drone strike.

Integrated electronic warfare, laser-based kinetic kill systems, and the Akashteer Integrated Command and Control System provide layered air defence against hostile UAVs.

How do these rework the Indian Army’s artillery?

This evolution marks a fundamental reconceptualisation of Indian artillery. From 260 largely standardised gun formations, the arm is transitioning into agile, tech-heavy strike formations that integrate conventional firepower with unmanned systems and artificial intelligence.

A 2022 study on reorganisation and rightsizing of the Army had flagged the need for such changes, while ARTRAC has begun reorienting training and education across gunner schools and regimental centres.

Together, the emergency induction of PULS rocket systems and the rise of Shaktibaan and Divyaastra signal a new era, one where India’s artillery is no longer just supporting arms, but a decisive, autonomous strike force shaping the battlefield of the future.

Credits: RNAMEDIA.IN

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fake agency: ICPC grills Femi Gbajabiamila

Published

on

The Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, on Monday, July 21, went before the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to answer questions over his alleged investigation into the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC).

The anti-graft agency is investigating the circumstances surrounding the operation of the purported council by Mr Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew, who allegedly presented himself as its Director-General. Adeniyi had initially alleged that the fake agency was orchestrated by Gbajabiamila. He later retracted his claim and then alleged that it was his now deceased ally that related with Gbajabiamila when the fake agency was being set up.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had, on July 7, directed the ICPC to investigate the fake agency and submit its report within 30 days.

Gbajabiamila’s counsel, Jiti Ogunye, confirmed his client’s appearance before the commission in a statement yesterday.

“In full cooperation with the ICPC, acting on the directive of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I hereby confirm that my client, Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief of Staff to the President, responded to the invitation of the ICPC.

He appeared at about 3p.m on Monday as part of the ongoing investigation into the activities of the fake PFIPC, among other issues.

My client gave his testimony, responded to questions accordingly and has since returned to his duty post.”

Adeyemi Matthew, the self-acclaimed Director-General of the PFIPC, was arrested last week after a court issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

He is believed to be in police custody pending the conclusion of investigations.

See also  ECOWAS begins recruitment for over 30 positions in Nigeria, others

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Russian warship carried out live firing exercise off UK coast

Published

on

A Russian warship carried out a live-fire artillery exercise approximately 46 miles off the coast of Plymouth on Monday, July 20, prompting close monitoring by the Royal Navy.

According to the UK Ministry of Defence, the Russian frigate Neustrashimy notified HMS Tyne, a Royal Navy offshore patrol vessel, of its intention to conduct the exercise before opening fire. A French military aircraft also contacted the vessel over radio to seek clarification on its activities.

The BBC reported that HMS Tyne was asked to move to a safer distance while the live-fire exercise took place, lasting about 30 minutes. The Ministry of Defence said it continues to closely monitor the vessel’s movements.

The incident is the latest involving Russian naval activity near UK waters. Russian warships regularly sail through international waters in the English Channel, although they do not enter British or French territorial waters. Last month, Royal Marine Commandos boarded a Russian “shadow fleet” oil tanker in the Channel during a six-hour operation, marking the first mission of its kind by UK armed forces.

In June, a retired British couple sailing a 40-foot yacht near the Isle of Wight became involved in an incident with the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich. Russia accused the couple of making a dangerous approach, while the couple insisted they were not on a collision course.

The couple said the warship sounded its horn before firing warning shots into the air, an action former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer described as “reckless”. The Russian Navy maintained it had attempted to contact the yacht through radio messages, flares and sound signals.

See also  US company withdraws Nigeria’s presidential jet from sale

The Admiral Grigorovich had also been monitored continuously by Royal Navy patrol ships for an entire month earlier this year as it escorted Russian vessels through the North Sea, Western Approaches and other international waters.

Late last year, the Russian corvette RFN Stoikiy was intercepted by HMS Severn while transiting the Dover Strait before being handed over to a NATO ally near the French coast. Another Russian vessel, Yantar, which is used to map undersea cables, was also detected operating close to UK waters during the same period.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu has not borrowed up to N80tn in three years– Nigerian Government

Published

on

The Federal Government has refuted reports alleging that President Bola Tinubu’s administration incurred approximately N80 trillion in debt within three years.

The FG clarified that the sweeping total is misleading, explaining that the figure predominantly stems from accounting adjustments and currency revaluations rather than fresh borrowing.

Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, provided the clarification during an economic briefing with the Senate Committee on Finance Monday evening, July 20.

Lawmakers had raised questions regarding reports indicating that the present administration had added nearly N80 trillion to the N75 trillion debt burden it inherited upon taking office.

Addressing the committee, Oyedele stated that the widely circulated figures fail to reflect actual new loans taken by the government.

“When this administration came into office, public debt was around N75tn. Many people simply compare that figure with today’s debt stock and conclude that this government has borrowed massively,” Oyedele said.

The minister elaborated that the sharp devaluation of the naira significantly inflated the local currency equivalent of Nigeria’s existing external debt, given that national debt totals are officially calculated and reported in naira. NigerianFootball News

“However, following the reforms and the depreciation of the naira, the foreign currency component of our public debt had to be revalued because Nigeria reports its debt in naira. That accounting adjustment alone added more than ₦40tn to the public debt figure,” he explained.

Oyedele further noted that approximately N33 trillion was added to the national debt balance following the National Assembly’s approval to securitize Ways and Means advances.

See also  Four ministers to quit Tinubu’s cabinet ahead of 2027

He emphasized that this process did not constitute fresh borrowing, but rather represented the formal recognition of pre-existing obligations.

Meanwhile, members of the Senate Committee on Finance voiced concern over what they characterized as poor implementation of the capital projects outlined in the 2026 budget.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending