Connect with us

Business

Banditry crisis: FG rejects northern govs’ call to suspend mining

Published

on

The Federal Government has ruled out a blanket suspension of mining activities across Northern Nigeria, despite calls by northern governors and traditional leaders for a six-month halt as part of efforts to curb insecurity in the region.

The Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake, disclosed this in an exclusive interaction with The PUNCH on Monday in Abuja, stressing that a total shutdown of mining operations would have grave economic consequences for both the North and the country at large.

The minister’s position was conveyed through his Special Assistant on Media, Segun Tomori, who said the Federal Government had carefully weighed the security concerns against the economic realities of ongoing mining and mineral processing activities across the region.

He said, “The position of the Federal Government remains that there can’t be a blanket suspension of mining activities across the North because it will have far more adverse economic implications for the region and the nation.”

Alake added that several strategic industrial facilities rely directly on mining operations in the North.

“We have lithium plants that are operational in Nasarawa and the outskirts of Abuja; an iron processing plant in Kaduna, and a host of other mining activities that will be affected by a blanket ban. Even the cement factory in Ajaokuta, Kogi State, depends on mining of limestone,” Tomori said.

He added that following engagements with the Federal Government, northern governors had begun to reconsider their earlier advice on a total ban.

“So, based on these facts, I believe the northern governors have reconsidered their advisory on a blanket ban based on our engagement with them,” he said.

Instead of a wholesale suspension, the minister said the Federal Government was pursuing a targeted security approach aimed at flushing out criminal elements operating around mining sites.

According to him, this strategy is already being implemented through a multi-agency security operation coordinated by the Office of the National Security Adviser, covering parts of the North-West, North-East and North-Central.

“What can work is to map out areas that are severely affected by bandit activities and rout the non-state actors. That is already being done through a multi-agency security operation coordinated by the NSA across the North-west, North-east and parts of the North-Central,” he said.

Tomori stressed that legitimate mining activities should not be punished for the actions of illegal operators.

He noted that consultations with state governments were ongoing, revealing that the Governor of Nasarawa State, Abdullahi Sule, met with the minister in January as part of the engagement process.

“There is no consideration for blanket suspension of all mining activities in the north. However, we are engaging with the Governors on how best to tackle the menace of insecurity fueled by illegal mining in some areas. The Nasarawa state Governor, Abdullahi Sule, met with the minister sometime in January as part of the consultations,” he said.

See also  Trump urges Turkey to stop buying Russian oil as Erdogan chases deal on F-35s

Responding categorically to demands by northern governors for a comprehensive audit and revalidation of mining licences, the minister confirmed that such a process was already being planned.

“We announced sometime last year that an audit of the entire sector is in the offing. Details are being worked out and are being kept under wraps until we are ready to announce its implementation,” he said.

To strengthen enforcement, the minister disclosed that the Federal Government was fast-tracking the deployment of satellite surveillance to monitor mining sites nationwide.

“We are fast-tracking the process for the installation of satellite surveillance of mining sites, among other measures, to bolster the capacity of the mining marshals for more effectiveness,” Tomori said.

He added that the Federal Government was working with international partners to improve security outcomes.

“The Federal Government will continue to do its best alongside its allies to ensure the security of the North and indeed the entire country. We can see improved security operations in hotbeds and recent collaboration with the US military in that regard,” he said.

In December 2025, the Northern Governors’ Forum, alongside other influential leaders, urged the Federal Government to suspend mining activities in the region for six months, arguing that illegal mining had become a major source of funding for banditry and other criminal activities.

This was contained in a communiqué issued after a joint meeting of the Northern States Governors’ Forum and the Northern Traditional Rulers’ Council held at the Sir Kashim Ibrahim House, Kaduna.

The call followed multiple school raids, violent attacks and kidnappings across mining communities, particularly in parts of Zamfara, Niger, Kaduna and Katsina states.

On November 17, 2025, armed men attacked the Government Girls Comprehensive Secondary School in Maga, Kebbi State, abducting 24 schoolgirls. The school’s vice-principal was killed during the attack. The students were freed a few days later.

Four days later, on November 21, gunmen invaded St. Mary’s Catholic School in the Papiri community, Agwara LGA of Niger State, abducting hundreds of pupils and staff.

Church and local officials later confirmed that 303 students and 12 teachers were taken away.

The escalating attacks prompted several states to order the temporary closure of schools in Kebbi, Bauchi, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Plateau, Niger, Katsina and Kwara states.

As a corrective measure, they asked President Tinubu to direct the Minister of Solid Minerals to suspend mining activities to allow for a full audit and revalidation of licences.

See also  Pure Water producers announce increment in price of bag

Nigeria’s solid minerals sector, however, has been identified by the Federal Government as a key pillar of its economic diversification drive, with significant investments in lithium, iron ore, limestone and gold expected to generate jobs, boost exports and grow non-oil revenue.

The government’s refusal to impose a blanket ban reflects a balancing act between security imperatives and economic survival, as authorities seek to clamp down on illegal mining without shutting down legitimate operations critical to regional development.

Meanwhile, Jigawa State is still waiting for the Federal Government’s response to the Northern Governors’ Forum’s demand to suspend mining activities in the region for six months to tackle insecurity.

Chief Press Secretary to the Jigawa State Governor, Comrade Hamisu Gumel, in an exclusive interview with one of our correspondents, the state government is concerned about the security implications of illegal mining, but hasn’t received any official communication from the Federal Government on the suspension.

“We are aware of the Northern Governors’ Forum’s demand, but we are yet to receive any official response from the Federal Government,” Gumel told our Correspondent.

Gumel added that Jigawa State had no records of cases related to illegal mining and insecurity, but the state government is committed to supporting efforts to address the issue.

“The Northern Governors’ Forum had requested the suspension of mining activities to allow for an audit and revalidation of licenses, citing concerns over the role of illegal mining in fuelling insecurity in the region,” he remarked.

According to him, the forum has also announced plans to establish a Security Trust Fund, with each state contributing N1bn monthly, to support joint security operations and intelligence-driven interventions.

However, Gumel, who said he’s not authorised to speak on behalf of the Northwest governor’s forum, explained that it is unclear how many states have contributed to the fund so far.

Gumel said the Jigawa State government is committed to working with the Federal Government and other stakeholders to address insecurity and promote economic development.

“The state government has been working to strengthen security measures and promote community engagement to prevent the spread of insecurity,” he concluded.

Similarly, the call by the Northern States Governors’ Forum for a six-month suspension of mining activities across northern Nigeria as part of measures to curb insecurity is yet to be fully implemented in Kwara State.

Findings show that while the initiative has been discussed at the policy level, contributions from individual states and full operational rollout remain at early stages, with no confirmed participation reported in Kwara as of the latest state security briefings.

See also  Nigeria, Benin deepen cross-border security, trade cooperation

Security analysts warn that the delay in implementing both the mining suspension and the regional trust fund may be prolonging vulnerabilities in mineral-rich rural communities, particularly in parts of North-Central Nigeria where illegal mining camps operate within remote forest corridors.

Coordinator of the Kwara Sustainable Development Advocacy Forum, Musa Idris Buko, said the group had raised concerns in 2024 about the possible security implications of unregulated mining activities in Kwara North.

“We raised the alarm and called on the Federal Government to prioritise the development of the mining sector in Kwara in line with global best practices,” he said.

“If illegal mining in Kwara North is allowed to thrive, it will affect food security and agricultural production. What we are witnessing today shows the dangers of ignoring early warnings.”

Some community stakeholders have also suggested that recurring attacks in remote areas may indirectly create conditions that force residents to abandon mineral-rich communities, allowing illegal mining networks to operate with limited resistance, a trend observers say has been recorded in several conflict-affected zones across northern Nigeria.

As security operations intensify across affected states, policy experts are urging the Federal Government and northern governors to clarify the status of the proposed mining suspension, accelerate the launch of the regional security trust fund and strengthen regulatory oversight of mining activities to prevent criminal groups from exploiting the sector.

However, the Bauchi State Government has confirmed suspension of mining activities in parts of the state as part of measures to address recurring insecurity.

Responding to enquiries from The PUNCH, the Special Assistant to the Governor, Khalifa Rishi, said the suspension was implemented in Alkaleri Local Government Area, which has witnessed repeated security challenges.

According to him, the decision was taken following incidents of insecurity linked to mining activities in the area.

“The suspension was implemented in the Alkaleri Local Government Area. It is because of the recurrent insecurity we recorded in the area,” Rishi said.

He noted that since the suspension of mining operations, there has been a significant improvement in the security situation in the affected communities.

Rishi, however, declined to comment on the status of the proposed security trust fund being planned by the Northern Governors’ Forum.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Abia begins relocation of transport operators to new terminal

Published

on

The Abia State Government has commenced the enforcement of its new centralised transport system in Umuahia, with the phased relocation of transport operators to the Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal, Umuahia.

The Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, made this known at Government House, Umuahia, on Tuesday while briefing newsmen on the outcome of this week’s State Executive Council (EXCO) meeting presided over by Governor Alex Otti.

The commissioner disclosed that, in order to ensure compliance by transport operators, the state government took time to hold a series of meetings with transport stakeholders, during which their concerns were addressed.

Kanu added that, following the steps taken by the government, full operations had commenced at the terminal, with informal transport operators and unions already moved to the facility, despite the normal resistance that accompanies change.

“There appears to be some push backs among some of the operators and this is as a result of the fact that people are not easily giving in to change.

“What is happening is that all the parks in the state have been moved to the bus terminal.

“The Honourable Commissioner for Transport and his team have been holding a series of meetings with all the operators. They had one yesterday. And a few of their anxieties will be addressed very soon. Enforcement also will commence today to bring all the operators into the terminal.

“The first phase of operations involves the operations of the Abia Green Shuttle buses. The second phase involves informal transport operators, while the third phase will involve the formal transport operators,” Kanu stated.

See also  Yuletide: Local flights break N300,000 mark

Answering questions from newsmen, the Commissioner for Transport, Dr Chimezie Ukaegbu, said the state government had not taken away anybody’s means of livelihood but had instead introduced a more organised system to sanitise the transport sector and improve it.

He revealed that transport unions and operators were told to bring four of their workers each to the terminal, where they would be properly identified with reflective tags and carried along.

He further noted that the terminal operates a transparent system that allocates loading opportunities on a first-come, first-served basis irrespective of union affiliations, insisting that about 80 to 90 per cent of operators had embraced the initiative. He added that continuous engagements were being held with those yet to fully comply with the government’s transport policy.

He equally noted that the government provided a drivers’ lodge, fully air-conditioned and furnished with seats, while passengers sit in a conducive air-conditioned environment, adding, “what else will you need as a transporter or even as a passenger? I think everything good about transportation is embedded in that Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal,” Ukaegbu stated.

Contributing, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Publicity, Mr Ferdinand Ekeoma, said that the centralisation of transport operations would reduce urban congestion, indiscriminate loading bays, expenses incurred by transport operators on their loading bays, and security challenges associated with the influx of unregulated transport operators, thereby enabling transport operators to make more gains.

He added that, over the years, “we have seen transport operators extort people, by coming up with this organised system, we are solving our problems,” Ekeoma stated.

See also  Trump urges Turkey to stop buying Russian oil as Erdogan chases deal on F-35s

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Court orders Virgin Atlantic to pay N13m for missed flight

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited to pay Mrs. Joy Ezetah the sum of $5,906.50 in damages after it failed to allow her board a scheduled Lagos-London flight, an incident that disrupted her onward trip to Canada and caused her financial loss.

Justice Ibrahim Kala in the judgement delivered on Monday, held that the airline was liable for the losses suffered by the claimant after she was denied boarding at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport on 6 April 2024.

The claimant had asked the court for N100m in general damages, arguing that she bought a business-class ticket through Air Canada for a four-leg trip from Lagos to Toronto and back, but was stopped from boarding the Virgin Atlantic flight “without justification.”

She told the court that she arrived early, completed check-in, and was issued a boarding pass for the Lagos-London leg.

According to her, airline officials later prevented her from boarding, stating they could not connect her ticket to her Air Canada connecting flight from London to Toronto.

Ezetah stated that the airline owed her a duty of care and should have resolved the issue with Air Canada or made other arrangements instead of denying her boarding.

She further maintained that when she later contacted Air Canada, the airline confirmed that her ticket was valid and that she was expected on the connecting flight.

Virgin Atlantic, however, denied liability. It said it was “not the issuing carrier” and insisted that the ticket had been purchased directly from Air Canada under a codeshare arrangement.

See also  Electricity reforms: Rivers, Kano, 19 others delay takeover

The airline also argued that an error code in the reservation system prevented it from issuing a boarding pass for the connecting flight and that it acted professionally by advising the passenger to contact the ticket issuer.

It further contended that the claimant’s inability to complete online check-in before arriving at the airport showed that there was already a problem with the ticket.

After reviewing the evidence, submissions and legal authorities cited by both sides, Justice Kala held that the claimant’s case had merit.

The court awarded $5,906.50 in damages against Virgin Atlantic and ordered that the sum be paid using the prevailing exchange rate published by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Based on the highest official rate of N1,365.50 to a dollar, the award translates to about N8.07m.

Justice Kala also ordered the airline to pay 10 per cent interest per annum on the judgment sum until full liquidation of the debt.

Additionally, the court awarded N5m as costs against Virgin Atlantic, noting that the claimant had been forced to approach the court to enforce her rights.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

States kick as Senate moves to amend Electricity Act; read details

Published

on

A fresh battle over the control of Nigeria’s electricity sector is brewing, as state electricity regulators have accused the National Assembly of attempting to claw back powers already devolved to states under the Constitution and the Electricity Act 2023.

In a strongly worded memorandum submitted to the Senate Committee on Power and obtained by our correspondent on Tuesday, electricity regulatory commissions and bureaus from 16 states warned that the proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 could reverse one of the most significant reforms in Nigeria’s power sector.

The regulators argued that the amendment bill, rather than strengthening the electricity market, seeks to restore extensive federal oversight over matters they insist have constitutionally become the responsibility of states.

The concerns were contained in a letter dated May 26, 2026, addressed to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Power and signed on behalf of the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and Bureaus.

Signatories to the document included the chairmen and chief executives of electricity regulators in Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Edo, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Kogi, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo and Plateau states.

The regulators said they had taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to begin building sub-national electricity markets and had already engaged investors based on the framework created by the law.

They noted that they had earlier met with the Senate committee and were subsequently requested to consolidate their concerns into a single memorandum for the consideration of lawmakers, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders.

The letter stated, “We represent State Regulatory Commissions/Bureaus that have taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to commence the development of our sub-national electricity markets and sectors.

We are grateful for the audience you granted us to raise concerns on the ongoing consideration of the proposed Amendment Bill 2026 to the Electricity Act 2023.

“As agreed during our discussion, we have collated and consolidated the comments into one document which is hereby attached for the consideration of the Senate and House Committees on Power, NERC and other stakeholders.”

The state electricity regulators said they had identified 17 contentious provisions in the proposed amendments to the Electricity Act that they believed could undermine the constitutional powers already granted to states in the electricity sector.

According to the regulators, the areas of disagreement include the authorisation of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on electricity matters, the supremacy of state laws within state electricity markets, and provisions seeking to retain federal control over all activities connected to the national grid.

Other disputed clauses relate to restrictions on states’ participation in the wholesale electricity market, matters concerning the Nigerian Wholesale Electricity Market, the authority of states over independent transmission and distribution networks, and the establishment and administration of the Power Consumers Assistance Fund.

The regulators also raised concerns over the proposed expansion of the powers of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, the structure and decisions of the Forum of Electricity Regulators, and the provision granting the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission final administrative appellate jurisdiction on certain issues arising within the forum.

See also  FG launches E-fiscal platform to crack down on tax evasion

They further opposed provisions designating electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply as essential services, as well as clauses dealing with government-owned enterprises as licensees and obligations to host communities.

Additional areas of contention include the regulation of intra-state electricity matters that may have implications for the national grid, the imposition of timelines and phased conditions for states transitioning into independent electricity markets, and proposed federal oversight on consumer protection, anti-trust measures and tariff design within state electricity jurisdictions.

The regulators argued that the disputed provisions require further consultation to ensure that the decentralisation objectives of the Electricity Act are not weakened by subsequent amendments.

“A review of the Bill suggests that the general intention is to reverse the devolution of legislative, governance and regulatory powers over electricity matters that occur solely within the respective states to the state governments, in favour of a reconsolidation of powers at the federal level, with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission retaining full supervisory powers over the market. Effectively, it appears that the intention of the Bill is that Nigeria should continue with the same regime that, for 20 years, has not led to any significant increase in power availability or per capita consumption for Nigerians, despite ever-increasing (and unsustainable) federal debt.”

At the centre of the dispute is the interpretation of the constitutional amendments that allowed states to legislate on electricity matters within their territories. The regulators argued that the proposed amendment bill wrongly assumes that state legislatures derive their powers from the National Assembly rather than directly from the Constitution.

According to them, any attempt by the National Assembly to grant, restrict or redefine those powers through ordinary legislation would amount to a constitutional violation.

The memorandum stated, “Section 2 of the Bill aims to amend Section 2(2)(a)-(e) of the Principal Act. By that section, the National Assembly reserves to itself the power to delegate legislative powers to States’ Houses of Assembly, suggesting that the Bill (or the Principal Act) is the source of the powers of a state to make laws on its electricity markets.

“This provision is based on a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law—it proceeds from the wrong assumption that the NASS, by ordinary legislation and not constitutional amendment, can confer (or restrict) the legislative power of states.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do. Consequently, Section 2 of the Bill, seeking to amend Section 2 of the Act, is not consistent with the Constitution.”

See also  Dangote plans pan-African IPO for $20bn refinery

The regulators described as “a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law” the provisions of the bill that appear to suggest that the National Assembly is the source of states’ authority over electricity matters.

They warned that the proposed law could undermine the principle of federalism by weakening state autonomy. Beyond constitutional concerns, the regulators said the bill could create uncertainty in the electricity market and discourage investors who had already committed resources based on the existing legal framework.

“The clear intention behind the new drafting is to reconsolidate in the Federal Government matters solely within the state electricity markets which had been devolved to the states,” the memorandum stated.

“This will defeat the key objectives of the Electricity Act and the various states’ electricity laws, even before the regime introduced by them has taken any root. It will introduce avoidable disruption in the industry as significant investment decisions have already been taken based on the Electricity Act 2023, and these investments are now put at risk by this proposed amendment.”

The state regulators specifically faulted provisions relating to federal oversight of activities connected to the national grid, restrictions on state authority over wholesale electricity transactions, the proposed expansion of NERC’s powers and changes affecting mini-grids and independent distribution systems.

They argued that allowing NERC to retain overriding authority over electricity activities merely because they have some connection to the national grid would effectively render state powers meaningless.

The memorandum stated, “What is required, in order to attain the full benefits of the decentralisation of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that is the theme of the Fifth Alteration and provided for in the Principal Act, is proper coordination on transmission matters between NERC and state regulators, and not top-down federal legislation.”

The regulators also rejected provisions that would permit NERC to exercise final administrative appellate jurisdiction over disputes involving state electricity regulators. According to them, NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority.

“NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority,” the memorandum said. “The National Assembly cannot arrogate to NERC quasi-judicial authority over SERCs, especially where the dispute might be on a matter over which NERC has no authority.”

They further argued that the Constitution already vests judicial powers in the courts and that such responsibilities cannot be transferred to a regulatory agency. The proposed establishment of a Forum of Electricity Regulators also drew criticism.

Although the regulators acknowledged the importance of coordination among electricity regulators, they argued that participation in such arrangements should be voluntary rather than imposed through federal legislation.

See also  Atiku, economists raise concern over Tinubu’s $516m loan request

“The better approach would be a Memorandum of Understanding or similar instrument jointly negotiated by all relevant regulatory bodies in which the principles of coordination and harmonisation will be agreed,” they said.

The state regulators equally opposed provisions declaring generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity as essential services covering both federal and state electricity markets.

According to them, such provisions could inadvertently expand NERC’s jurisdiction into areas already devolved to states, including tariff regulation. “The provision is invidious, regressive and should be expunged,” the memorandum stated.

The regulators also faulted proposals empowering NERC to determine contributions to the Power Consumers Assistance Fund from electricity consumers. They argued that since electricity tariffs and retail supply have become matters for state regulation, decisions relating to subsidies and customer contributions should similarly reside with state authorities.

Other contentious areas identified by the regulators included host community obligations, the role of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, licensing arrangements involving government-owned electricity enterprises and timelines for states transitioning into independent electricity markets.

The dispute highlights the growing tension between the Federal Government and states over the future structure of Nigeria’s electricity industry. The Electricity Act 2023 was enacted following the Fifth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution, which removed electricity from the Exclusive Legislative List and empowered states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity within their territories.

Since then, several states have enacted electricity laws and established regulatory agencies to oversee emerging sub-national electricity markets. Lagos, Enugu, Ekiti, Ondo, Edo and other states have already commenced varying stages of implementation of their electricity reform programmes.

Energy experts have repeatedly described the decentralisation of the sector as a major opportunity to attract investment, improve efficiency and expand access to electricity. However, the latest amendment proposals appear to have reopened the debate over how regulatory powers should be shared between Abuja and the states.

As the National Assembly continues deliberations on the amendment bill, the position adopted by lawmakers could shape the future direction of Nigeria’s electricity reforms and determine whether the country deepens its experiment with decentralisation or returns to a more centralised regulatory model.

The Electricity Act 2023 was designed to operationalise the constitutional amendments that empowered states to participate directly in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their boundaries. Since its enactment, several states have passed their own electricity laws and established regulatory commissions.

The proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 seeks to amend several provisions of the principal legislation. However, state regulators contend that some of the proposed changes amount to an attempt to reverse the gains of decentralisation and restore broad federal control over the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending