News

Why El-Rufai’s Bail Application Was Denied

Published

3 months ago

April 23, 2026

A Kaduna State High Court has denied bail to former governor of the state, Nasir El-Rufai, in an ongoing trial over alleged financial misconduct.

Delivering a ruling on Tuesday, Justice Darius Khobo held that it was in the interest of justice for the defendant to remain in custody to ensure his availability for trial.

El-Rufai was arraigned by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on a nine-count charge bordering on the alleged conferment of benefits under false pretences and dishonest disposal of loan funds.

He pleaded not guilty to all charges.

According to the court, the bail application was supported by a 24-paragraph affidavit, in which the former governor argued that the offences were non-capital.

He also cited his status as a former governor, his strong community ties, and his voluntary return to Nigeria from Egypt.

El-Rufai further claimed that he had underlying health conditions requiring specialist care.

The anti-corruption agency opposed the bail request, filing a counter-affidavit.

The ICPC argued that the offences were “economically sabotaging” and raised concerns about possible interference with witnesses and ongoing investigations.

It also described the defendant as a “flight risk with the means to evade trial due to his high standing in society.” The commission added that no medical evidence was provided to support claims of ill health.

In his ruling, Justice Khobo said the bail application relied heavily on El-Rufai’s status, describing it as “a double-edged sword.”

He noted that concerns raised by the ICPC about interference with investigations were significant.

According to the certified true copy (CTC) of the ruling delivered on April 21, obtained by The Cable, the judge held that the prosecution made “weighty depositions” justifying the refusal of bail, adding that the defence failed to counter them with further evidence.

The judge said, “It is, however, noteworthy here that in spite of these weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit, which sought to controvert the depositions in the Applicant’s supporting affidavit, the Applicant never deemed it fit to file a further and better affidavit to further controvert the said weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit.

“In the instant case, therefore, failure to file a further affidavit by the applicant to further controvert the above-outlined weighty depositions in the Respondent’s counter affidavit leaves the said weighty depositions in the counter affidavit unchallenged and deemed to be admitted as being correct, and I so hold.

“The law is trite: if in an application for bail pending trial there is good reason to believe or strongly suspect that the accused will jump bail, thereby making himself unavailable to stand his trial, and/or will interfere with the witnesses, thereby constituting an obstacle in the way of justice, the Court will be acting within its undoubted discretion to refuse bail.

“In the instant application, the applicant alluded to facts that he has health conditions requiring specialist monitoring, but the applicant did not attach any medical evidence to substantiate his claim of ill-health.

“The law is settled that where an application for bail seeks to lay claim to ill-health, credible evidence in that branch of medicine ought to be made available before the court by the Applicant.

“Accordingly, the Defendant/Applicant’s application for bail pending trial fails and is hereby REFUSED.

“The Defendant/Applicant shall remain in the custody of the Respondent (ICPC) pending the commencement of the trial.

“The Respondent/Prosecution is hereby ordered to ensure the trial of the Defendant commences expeditiously and shall be given an accelerated hearing by this Court on a day-to-day basis where practicable.”

Afterwards, the prosecutor and el-Rufai’s counsel agreed that the trial should commence the first week of June.

The case was then adjourned to June 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 156

News

Fake agency: ICPC grills Femi Gbajabiamila

Published

1 hour ago

July 21, 2026

Oluwagbenga Olaoye

The Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, on Monday, July 21, went before the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to answer questions over his alleged investigation into the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC).

The anti-graft agency is investigating the circumstances surrounding the operation of the purported council by Mr Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew, who allegedly presented himself as its Director-General. Adeniyi had initially alleged that the fake agency was orchestrated by Gbajabiamila. He later retracted his claim and then alleged that it was his now deceased ally that related with Gbajabiamila when the fake agency was being set up.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had, on July 7, directed the ICPC to investigate the fake agency and submit its report within 30 days.

Gbajabiamila’s counsel, Jiti Ogunye, confirmed his client’s appearance before the commission in a statement yesterday.

“In full cooperation with the ICPC, acting on the directive of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I hereby confirm that my client, Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief of Staff to the President, responded to the invitation of the ICPC.

He appeared at about 3p.m on Monday as part of the ongoing investigation into the activities of the fake PFIPC, among other issues.

My client gave his testimony, responded to questions accordingly and has since returned to his duty post.”

Adeyemi Matthew, the self-acclaimed Director-General of the PFIPC, was arrested last week after a court issued a bench warrant for his arrest.

He is believed to be in police custody pending the conclusion of investigations.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 32

News

Russian warship carried out live firing exercise off UK coast

Published

1 hour ago

July 21, 2026

Oluwagbenga Olaoye

A Russian warship carried out a live-fire artillery exercise approximately 46 miles off the coast of Plymouth on Monday, July 20, prompting close monitoring by the Royal Navy.

According to the UK Ministry of Defence, the Russian frigate Neustrashimy notified HMS Tyne, a Royal Navy offshore patrol vessel, of its intention to conduct the exercise before opening fire. A French military aircraft also contacted the vessel over radio to seek clarification on its activities.

The BBC reported that HMS Tyne was asked to move to a safer distance while the live-fire exercise took place, lasting about 30 minutes. The Ministry of Defence said it continues to closely monitor the vessel’s movements.

The incident is the latest involving Russian naval activity near UK waters. Russian warships regularly sail through international waters in the English Channel, although they do not enter British or French territorial waters. Last month, Royal Marine Commandos boarded a Russian “shadow fleet” oil tanker in the Channel during a six-hour operation, marking the first mission of its kind by UK armed forces.

In June, a retired British couple sailing a 40-foot yacht near the Isle of Wight became involved in an incident with the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich. Russia accused the couple of making a dangerous approach, while the couple insisted they were not on a collision course.

The couple said the warship sounded its horn before firing warning shots into the air, an action former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer described as “reckless”. The Russian Navy maintained it had attempted to contact the yacht through radio messages, flares and sound signals.

The Admiral Grigorovich had also been monitored continuously by Royal Navy patrol ships for an entire month earlier this year as it escorted Russian vessels through the North Sea, Western Approaches and other international waters.

Late last year, the Russian corvette RFN Stoikiy was intercepted by HMS Severn while transiting the Dover Strait before being handed over to a NATO ally near the French coast. Another Russian vessel, Yantar, which is used to map undersea cables, was also detected operating close to UK waters during the same period.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 35

News

Tinubu has not borrowed up to N80tn in three years– Nigerian Government

Published

2 hours ago

July 21, 2026

Oluwagbenga Olaoye

The Federal Government has refuted reports alleging that President Bola Tinubu’s administration incurred approximately N80 trillion in debt within three years.

The FG clarified that the sweeping total is misleading, explaining that the figure predominantly stems from accounting adjustments and currency revaluations rather than fresh borrowing.

Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, provided the clarification during an economic briefing with the Senate Committee on Finance Monday evening, July 20.

Lawmakers had raised questions regarding reports indicating that the present administration had added nearly N80 trillion to the N75 trillion debt burden it inherited upon taking office.

Addressing the committee, Oyedele stated that the widely circulated figures fail to reflect actual new loans taken by the government.

“When this administration came into office, public debt was around N75tn. Many people simply compare that figure with today’s debt stock and conclude that this government has borrowed massively,” Oyedele said.

The minister elaborated that the sharp devaluation of the naira significantly inflated the local currency equivalent of Nigeria’s existing external debt, given that national debt totals are officially calculated and reported in naira. NigerianFootball News

“However, following the reforms and the depreciation of the naira, the foreign currency component of our public debt had to be revalued because Nigeria reports its debt in naira. That accounting adjustment alone added more than ₦40tn to the public debt figure,” he explained.

Oyedele further noted that approximately N33 trillion was added to the national debt balance following the National Assembly’s approval to securitize Ways and Means advances.

He emphasized that this process did not constitute fresh borrowing, but rather represented the formal recognition of pre-existing obligations.

Meanwhile, members of the Senate Committee on Finance voiced concern over what they characterized as poor implementation of the capital projects outlined in the 2026 budget.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 33