Connect with us

News

Why El-Rufai’s Bail Application Was Denied

Published

on

A Kaduna State High Court has denied bail to former governor of the state, Nasir El-Rufai, in an ongoing trial over alleged financial misconduct.

Delivering a ruling on Tuesday, Justice Darius Khobo held that it was in the interest of justice for the defendant to remain in custody to ensure his availability for trial.

El-Rufai was arraigned by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on a nine-count charge bordering on the alleged conferment of benefits under false pretences and dishonest disposal of loan funds.

He pleaded not guilty to all charges.

According to the court, the bail application was supported by a 24-paragraph affidavit, in which the former governor argued that the offences were non-capital.

He also cited his status as a former governor, his strong community ties, and his voluntary return to Nigeria from Egypt.

El-Rufai further claimed that he had underlying health conditions requiring specialist care.

The anti-corruption agency opposed the bail request, filing a counter-affidavit.

The ICPC argued that the offences were “economically sabotaging” and raised concerns about possible interference with witnesses and ongoing investigations.

It also described the defendant as a “flight risk with the means to evade trial due to his high standing in society.” The commission added that no medical evidence was provided to support claims of ill health.

In his ruling, Justice Khobo said the bail application relied heavily on El-Rufai’s status, describing it as “a double-edged sword.”

He noted that concerns raised by the ICPC about interference with investigations were significant.

See also  President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR Appoints General Christopher Musa(Rtd) as Defence Minister.

According to the certified true copy (CTC) of the ruling delivered on April 21, obtained by The Cable, the judge held that the prosecution made “weighty depositions” justifying the refusal of bail, adding that the defence failed to counter them with further evidence.

The judge said, “It is, however, noteworthy here that in spite of these weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit, which sought to controvert the depositions in the Applicant’s supporting affidavit, the Applicant never deemed it fit to file a further and better affidavit to further controvert the said weighty depositions in the Prosecution/Respondent’s counter affidavit.

“In the instant case, therefore, failure to file a further affidavit by the applicant to further controvert the above-outlined weighty depositions in the Respondent’s counter affidavit leaves the said weighty depositions in the counter affidavit unchallenged and deemed to be admitted as being correct, and I so hold.

“The law is trite: if in an application for bail pending trial there is good reason to believe or strongly suspect that the accused will jump bail, thereby making himself unavailable to stand his trial, and/or will interfere with the witnesses, thereby constituting an obstacle in the way of justice, the Court will be acting within its undoubted discretion to refuse bail.

“In the instant application, the applicant alluded to facts that he has health conditions requiring specialist monitoring, but the applicant did not attach any medical evidence to substantiate his claim of ill-health.

“The law is settled that where an application for bail seeks to lay claim to ill-health, credible evidence in that branch of medicine ought to be made available before the court by the Applicant.

See also  Oyo abduction: Outrage spreads after teacher’s beheading, Tinubu vows rescue

“Accordingly, the Defendant/Applicant’s application for bail pending trial fails and is hereby REFUSED.

“The Defendant/Applicant shall remain in the custody of the Respondent (ICPC) pending the commencement of the trial.

“The Respondent/Prosecution is hereby ordered to ensure the trial of the Defendant commences expeditiously and shall be given an accelerated hearing by this Court on a day-to-day basis where practicable.”

Afterwards, the prosecutor and el-Rufai’s counsel agreed that the trial should commence the first week of June.

The case was then adjourned to June 1, 2, 3, and 4, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Edo: Midnight Fire Destroys 7 Shops, Goods Lost

Published

on

A midnight fire has destroyed seven shops and an undisclosed quantity of goods along Amen Owie Street, opposite Delano Hotels, off Second Ugbor Road, Abuja Quarters, in Benin City, Edo State.

The fire reportedly broke out at about 3am on Sunday, leaving shop owners with significant losses. No lives were lost.

Some of the affected traders, who confirmed the incident in interviews, said they were alerted by neighbours who called them after the fire started.

The traders suspected that the fire might have been caused by an electrical appliance allegedly left on in one of the shops after the owner closed late for the day.

They also said the incident occurred after the Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC) restored electricity to the area.

However, the cause of the fire has yet to be officially established.

Residents reportedly rushed to the scene and forced open the doors of some shops to evacuate valuables in an effort to minimise losses.

Their intervention also helped prevent the fire from spreading to other parts of the neighbourhood, although seven shops were affected.

The shop owners said attempts to get the Edo State Fire Service to the scene proved difficult because of the time the incident occurred.

The quantity and value of the goods destroyed have yet to be determined.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Let Nigerians choose leaders, Onaiyekan tells INEC ahead of 2027 elections
Continue Reading

News

Ransom: ‘The Money Has Been Returned’ – Parents Of Kidnapped NYSC Member

Published

on

The parents of a prospective National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member abducted in Imo State have confirmed that the N6m their family contributed towards securing his release has been refunded.

They said they were unsure whether the representatives who handled negotiations delivered the money to the kidnappers before the victims were freed.

Their son was among 20 prospective corps members abducted on the Owerri-Onitsha Expressway on October 1.

His mother, Alirat Wahab, had earlier told News Central that the family paid ₦6 million for his release. However, in a later interview with the station, Obasanjo Wahab said the station returned the money.

“The money has been returned. We just want to thank Imo for a job well done,” he said.

Obasanjo explained that three representatives were selected from the affected families, including one from his family, to seek the victims’ release.

“They went to look for the kidnapped corps members to see whether they would be freed or not,” he said.

Asked whether the representatives eventually paid the kidnappers, he replied, “We don’t know.”

He added, “The kidnappers had asked for representatives to bring the ransom. Since they could no longer hold the corps members hostage, they let them go.”

Confirming the development, Alirat said the families’ representatives returned the contributions.

“They returned it to those who went to represent us. Every parent has received their money back,” she said.

Obasanjo appealed to the public to move on from the incident and expressed appreciation to the Imo State Government for its role in the victims’ release.

See also  AU condemns Zamfara killings, demands release of abducted women, children

“You know what, let’s forget the matter and just appeal to the Imo State Government. We should be grateful to them,” he said.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Trump says Ukraine should get a new leader as he spars with Zelensky over US-Russia diesel deal

Published

on

US President Donald Trump on Saturday, October 10 criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as the two leaders clashed over a new energy agreement between the United States and Russia, suggesting that Ukraine should replace its leadership.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump expressed frustration with Zelensky following a series of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian oil refineries that Washington had urged Kyiv to avoid.

“You know what I suggest? I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal because he could have made many deals and for some reason, he never does,” Trump said.

The public dispute follows Trump’s Friday announcement of an agreement reached with Russian President Vladimir Putin to supply global energy markets with Russian diesel fuel in an effort to reduce domestic fuel costs ahead of the upcoming U.S. midterm elections.

According to U.S. officials, persistent Ukrainian strikes on Russian refinery infrastructure contributed to Trump’s decision to negotiate the deal directly with Moscow.

Zelensky strongly criticized the accord, characterising the agreement as a setback to peace efforts that financializes Russia’s military campaign.

“Investment in a war that must be ended, not prolonged,” Zelensky said, describing the move as “a weak decision of strong partners.”

Under the terms posted by Trump on social media, Putin agreed during a phone call to immediately supply over 300,000 tons of diesel to global markets, with an additional 500,000 tons slated for November delivery. The combined 800,000 tons, equivalent to approximately six million barrels—represents roughly one and a half days of total U.S. diesel consumption, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

See also  Let Nigerians choose leaders, Onaiyekan tells INEC ahead of 2027 elections

Trump noted that additional shipments of millions of tons of Russian diesel would follow based on the operational condition of Russian refineries.

When asked by reporters whether easing restrictions on Russian energy exports risks prolonging the armed conflict, Trump placed responsibility for the continued fighting on the Ukrainian administration.

“Zelensky could’ve settled this war many times … and he chooses not to,” Trump remarked, adding that the Ukrainian leader “wants to make problems for the world.”

Former U.S. officials and market analysts expressed skepticism regarding the impact of the agreement, pointing out that Russian diesel production has faced severe strain due to recent Ukrainian strikes. Kyiv reported hitting five Russian refineries in the week leading up to the announcement.

Energy analysts further noted that the volumes involved represent a minor shift in overall global supplies.”We are talking perhaps a 5%-6% increase in supply between now and year end,” said Dan Pickering, founder and chief investment officer at Pickering Energy Partners.

“Bottom line — this is helpful but not a needle mover for global diesel markets. Side note — there is a reason Trump talked about volumes in tons instead of barrels. The tons number looks bigger to a general observer. This is more politics than a game changer.”

Russia had previously instituted a formal ban on domestic diesel exports in early July following widespread fuel shortages caused by Ukrainian drone attacks, withdrawing approximately 800,000 barrels per day from global circulation.

Following the bilateral discussions, Kremlin readouts confirmed Putin’s willingness to resume energy shipments to international markets.

“I am confident that this will have a positive impact on the entire global economy,” Putin stated according to the official Kremlin summary.

See also  Oyo abduction: Outrage spreads after teacher’s beheading, Tinubu vows rescue

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending