Connect with us

Politics

Tension mounts as APC panels disqualify over 150 aspirants in the Pre-primary screening

Published

on

Petitions, protests, legal threats and accusations of imposition have trailed the ongoing screening of aspirants by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) across several states ahead of the 2027 general elections, exposing widening cracks within the party over the use of consensus arrangements and the disqualification of aspirants.

Investigations by The PUNCH revealed that aggrieved aspirants in states including Taraba, Kano, Jigawa, Anambra, Benue, Kogi, Kaduna, Ebonyi, Rivers, and Plateau are mobilising petitions and possible legal challenges over the outcome of the party’s screening exercises.

The screening exercise forms part of the APC’s nationwide process aimed at reducing the number of aspirants ahead of the party primaries. However, the exercise has already generated controversy in several states, with disqualified aspirants expected to seek redress through appeal committees.

In some states, protests have already erupted, while in others, party stakeholders warned that attempts to impose candidates could trigger defections, anti-party activities and deepen internal divisions ahead of the primaries.

In Taraba State, the endorsement of incumbent lawmakers, reportedly backed by party stakeholders after the screening exercise, sparked fierce backlash, particularly in Taraba North Senatorial District, where youth groups and stakeholders openly rejected the endorsement of Senator Shuaibu Isa Lau.

A stakeholder from Karim Lamido Local Government Area, Paul Penuel, described the senator’s tenure as “a complete failure,” insisting that there was “no record of impactful projects, no policy footprint, and nothing measurable” to justify another term.

Another constituent, Dickson Kwinde, warned that repeating what he called a “costly political mistake” could alienate voters.

“A mistake like this must never be repeated. The people of Taraba North cannot continue to be taken for granted,” he said.

Similarly, the Coalition of Concerned Youths and Voice of the Proletariat in Karim Lamido rejected the senator’s endorsement.

“We categorically state that we do not support Senator Shuaibu Isa Lau for any position. As far as we are concerned, he has nothing to show for his years in office and does not deserve another mandate,” the group stated through its convener, Godwin Karim.

Party sources disclosed that some aggrieved aspirants had begun preparing petitions against the screening outcome, alleging procedural irregularities, manipulation by political godfathers and attempts to impose consensus candidates without adequate consultation.

Some aspirants were also said to be considering protests and legal action if the appeal process failed to address their grievances.

Efforts are reportedly ongoing to reconcile the aggrieved members and prevent possible defections or anti-party activities ahead of the 2027 general elections.

In Kano State, no fewer than 20 aspirants seeking Senate, House of Representatives and State Assembly tickets were screened out despite earlier consensus arrangements.

Among those affected were former Head of Service, Usman Bala; former lawmaker, Sha’aban Sharada; Muhammad Zango; Danyaro Yakasai; Abbas Abbas; Shehu  Driver and A.A. Zaura in the Kano Central Senatorial contest.

However, the state APC Publicity Secretary, Auwal Soja, confirmed that six aspirants in Kano Central eventually stepped down for former Governor Ibrahim Shekarau following a high-level reconciliation meeting.

“The six aspirants stepped down for Shekarau in the interest of unity and peace in Kano State,” he said.

Despite the arrangement, protests continued to trail the process. A group operating under the Coalition for Better Kano faulted the endorsement of Shekarau, arguing that loyalty and consistency should not be sacrificed for political expediency.

“The principles of political justice demand that loyalty must be rewarded. To bypass a foot soldier that stood firm for the party in favour of a newcomer, no matter how prominent, would send the wrong message,” the group said.

Efforts by Governor Abba Yusuf to reconcile aggrieved aspirants reportedly suffered setbacks after some stakeholders boycotted the reconciliation meeting convened to calm tensions.

Observers also expressed concern over the absence of key figures, including ALGON chairperson, Hajiya Sa’adatu Soja, and aggrieved aspirant, Salisu Yusha’u, warning that the development could weaken peace efforts within the party.

In Jigawa State, the fallout from the screening exercise resulted in resignation and defection.

Former Speaker of the Jigawa State House of Assembly, Isah Idris, resigned from the APC after he was disqualified and replaced by another aspirant.

In his resignation letter, Idris lamented what he described as the party’s departure from its founding principles.

“As a founding member and former Speaker, I had hoped that the APC would remain true to the principles on which it was established. However, I now believe it is time for me to move on,” he wrote.

See also  Terrorist bello Turji’s threat: How families risk lives to enter Niger Republic — Sokoto residents

The former speaker subsequently defected to the Peoples Democratic Party.

Another former speaker, Idris Garba, and serving lawmaker, Abubakar Sadiq, were also edged out during the exercise, heightening fears of deeper cracks within the state chapter.

Party insiders warned that failure to reconcile aggrieved stakeholders could destabilise the APC ahead of the primaries.

“You cannot push out key mobilisers and expect them to work for the same people that sidelined them,” a party insider warned.

In Benue State, about 40 aspirants were reportedly disqualified during the screening of House of Assembly hopefuls conducted in Makurdi.

The disqualifications have already generated discontent among supporters who accused the party of violating zoning arrangements and excluding certain blocs from representation.

A supporter of one of the affected aspirants, who identified himself simply as Amos, warned that the development could hurt the party electorally.

“It is our turn in Gboko to produce the state Assembly member because stakeholders had micro-zoned it to our area. People contributed money for the aspirant to purchase forms. If this is not corrected, it will be to the detriment of the party during the election,” he said.

In Kogi State, protests and accusations of authoritarianism followed allegations that nomination forms were selectively distributed to preferred aspirants under what critics described as a “Commando arrangement.”

A party chieftain, Chief Femi Olugbemi, accused the state leadership of abandoning democratic principles.

“Democracy within the APC in Kogi has been reduced to directives from above,” he alleged.

He further claimed that aspirants with strong grassroots support were deliberately excluded from the process.

“Forms that should be open to all qualified members are being shared selectively, and many of us with strong followings have been locked out,” he stated.

The controversy has fuelled fears of mass defections and legal disputes within the state chapter.

Similarly, in Anambra State, the APC expelled 30 members, including aspirants for Senate and House of Representatives seats, for instituting legal actions against the party.

The state Publicity Secretary, Valentine Iyiegbu, said the decision was taken in line with the party constitution.

“No fewer than 30 members of the APC in the state have been expelled following their litigations against the party,” he stated.

According to him, the only reprieve available to the expelled members would be the withdrawal of their court cases.

“It is only when the matters are withdrawn from the court that the party can consider listening to them,” he added.

In Kaduna State, although the House of Assembly screening reportedly ended without disqualification due to consensus arrangements brokered by party leaders, controversy erupted over moves to impose consensus candidates for National Assembly positions.

The crisis is particularly intense in Kaduna Central Senatorial District, where former lawmaker and activist, Shehu Sani, is reportedly being favoured as a consensus candidate.

The arrangement has been rejected by former Speaker Yusuf Zailani and activist Yarima Shettima.

“We strongly reject the so-called consensus arrangement in its entirety. Kaduna Central cannot be sacrificed on the altar of political manipulation and backroom deals,” Shettima declared.

Zailani’s camp also warned against imposing candidates on party members.

“Politics belongs to the people, not to one person alone. Just because someone is endorsed does not mean he has already won the election,” his Campaign Director, Musa Aliyu Khalid, stated.

The same scenario appears to be playing out in Ebonyi as disqualified candidates expressed dissatisfaction with the process.

An aspirant for the Ebonyi Central Senatorial District seat, Chief Christian Nwali, resigned in protest from the APC.

The PUNCH reports that Nwali, an ally of the Minister of Works, David Umahi, was among the aspirants who lost out in the consensus arrangement adopted by the Ebonyi APC.

In a letter addressed to the state APC Chairman, Ekpelu Ward in Ikwo LGA, he stated that his resignation was “with immediate effect.”

“This serves as an official notice of my formal withdrawal from party activities and responsibilities,” the letter read in part.

In Rivers State, no fewer than 65 aspirants were disqualified by the Rivers State House of Assembly Screening Appeal Committee of the APC.

The panel confirmed that 33 aspirants were cleared during last weekend’s screening ahead of the party’s primaries.

Chairman of the panel and human rights lawyer, Dr Abdul Mahmud, disclosed this at a news briefing at the APC Secretariat in Port Harcourt on Tuesday.

See also  Kano Assembly moves to impeach deputy governor, see reasons

Mahmud said both the number of cleared aspirants and those disqualified have been affirmed by various committees.

While noting that he is not a member of the APC, Mahmud disclosed that he is a private legal practitioner but that the leadership of the party chose him to head the screening appeal in the state because of the confidence reposed in him.

He disclosed that as of the time of the briefing, his appeal panel had received 19 petitions from aspirants, of which none had been treated. The panel chairman said the committee will continue sitting till Wednesday, 13th May.

He commended the aspirants who submitted petitions for their peaceful conduct and for turning out early before the panel arrived for its first sitting on Tuesday.

“We salute the appellants. They were already here when we came. It has been peaceful since we started. What we are doing is just straightforward. It is not a penalty shootout.

“Appellants have written to the chairman of the party, who has forwarded their petitions to us to consider. Some portions were received last night. The bulk of it was received this morning as soon as we came in.

“To my left, you’ll find the untreated petitions. We are calling each one after the other.”

He said the panel has also received the report of the screening committee on arrival.

“We have received a report from the screening panel. It’s a two-stage process. The screening panel met with them and scrutinised them.

“The report was also served on us because it also has to guide us on the infractions the aspirants may have committed that made the screening panel not clear them.

“Perhaps, some lessons can be drawn. I need to say it. But the bulk of the complaints that we have heard, not stated in their petitions, but in their oral presentations, were that the non-clearance decisions were not communicated to them.

“All of them pointed to the fact that they read their non-clearance on Facebook. Perhaps next time the party must learn from this experience,” Mahmud stated.

He advised the party, “When you clear and don’t clear aspirants, the people have telephone numbers. They should be able to send them text messages or WhatsApp messages that you have not been cleared for this reason.”

On the petitions, he said, “We have treated nine so far. Those cleared are 33, cleared by different committees, and 65 were not cleared. The report we have has a list of 98 aspirants. We have received 16 appeals so far. We have treated nine. The time of my limit ends on the 13th of May 2026. I will be here till 5 pm tomorrow.”

He disclosed that disqualified aspirants who appeared before the panel without documents were asked to bring such documents and present them before the panel.

“We need to see the document and sight the document.  I’m not interested in your factions. It is your document I speak to,” he added, while warning disqualified aspirants against contacting him via text messages or any other means.

The APC in Plateau State is preparing for possible fallout from the screening of House of Assembly aspirants, following reports that several contenders were screened out ahead of the official release of results.

Party sources told The PUNCH in Jos on Tuesday that the screening committees had completed their assignment, although the national leadership of the party had yet to publish the outcome. The delay, insiders said, has heightened anxiety among aspirants and supporters, with growing fears that the exercise could deepen existing divisions within the state chapter.

When contacted, the Plateau APC chairman, Rufus Bature, declined to disclose the number of aspirants allegedly disqualified or comment on the mood within the party.

“What I can tell you for now is that we have screened all the aspirants, but the result of the screening committee is not yet out,” Bature said.

“We are still waiting for them to release the results. So, nobody will tell anything further until the result is made public. And sure, very soon, the committee will do that,” he added.

However, some aspirants told The PUNCH that they had been verbally informed of their disqualification without receiving any formal communication from the party. A number of them accused the screening panels of irregularities and lack of transparency, while others disclosed plans to file petitions challenging their exclusion.

See also  Tinubu did not win the 2023 election- former SGF, Babachir Lawal

Party insiders warned that the appeal process could reopen long-standing factional disagreements within the Plateau APC if grievances are not properly managed.

“The concern is that some of these aspirants have strong local structures and political influence. If they feel unfairly treated, it could create fresh tensions within the party,” a source familiar with the process said.

As of Tuesday evening, the national leadership of the APC had yet to release the consolidated list of cleared and disqualified aspirants for the state House of Assembly elections.

Meanwhile, the Imo State chapter of the APC said the list of cleared House of Assembly aspirants would be released on Wednesday (today).

The state APC Publicity Secretary, Dr Jones Onwuasoanya, disclosed this on Tuesday, explaining that the screening committee, chaired by Chief Judith Enanutor, screened a total of 106 aspirants at the party secretariat.

He denied knowledge of any disqualified aspirants, insisting that only the official publication would determine the final status of contestants.

“The list of qualified aspirants will be published. As of now, there is no list of qualified or disqualified aspirants. May 13 is the scheduled date for publication of names of qualified aspirants,” Onwuasoanya stated.

“The correct number of House of Assembly aspirants is 106,” he added.

He further reiterated that the screening committee had concluded its assignment and urged aspirants to wait for the official release of the list before concluding.

Amid the growing tensions, reconciliation efforts are ongoing in several states as party leaders move to prevent possible defections and anti-party activities.

While some states, such as Sokoto and Kebbi, recorded relatively calm exercises under consensus arrangements, political analysts warned that the wave of grievances emerging from many APC chapters could threaten party cohesion if not properly managed before the primaries.

According to analysts, the increasing resort to consensus candidacies, screening controversies and disqualifications has exposed the difficult balance between party control and internal democracy within the ruling party ahead of the 2027 elections.

In Abia State, the screening of House of Assembly aspirants commenced on Monday and was still ongoing as of Tuesday evening. The state Publicity Secretary of the APC, Uche Aguoru, said the process would be concluded on Tuesday, while acknowledging that disagreements may follow the release of the final list.

According to him, the party remained committed to constitutional provisions guiding direct primaries where consensus fails.

“Earlier, the party insisted that there would be no adoption or consensus aspirant unless parties to the position agree. In the event of disagreement even by one person, the constitutional provision of direct primaries will be used,” Aguoru stated.

In Gombe State, the APC also confirmed that the screening of House of Assembly aspirants was still ongoing.

The exercise, which is taking place at the APC Square in Gombe metropolis, attracted aspirants from the state’s 24 constituencies.

Speaking in a telephone interview with The PUNCH, party official Moses Kyari said the process had not been concluded.

“We are yet to conclude the process. I will personally confirm the number of those screened and disqualified, if there are any, tomorrow (Wednesday) when we complete it,” Kyari said.

The Zamfara state screening committee for the House of Assembly has sold 114 forms for the state assembly, which has just 22 seats.

Addressing journalists after the screening exercise, the state APC spokesperson, Alhaji Ibrahim Magaji, explained that only 105 out of 114 candidates who filled the forms have shown up for screening.

He said,” The screening commenced yesterday, Monday and will end on Wednesday. Those who are yet to show up can still come here from now to Wednesday this week, and if at the end of the exercise, they do not come, it means they are disqualified.”

Speaking to The PUNCH, an APC stalwart in the state, Dr Sani Shinkafi, said there would be a primary election if the consensus arrangement fails.

Additional reporting: Maiharaji Altine, Ikenna Obianeri, Salisu Kabuga, Toheeb Omotayo, Esha Aliku, John Charles, Godwin Isenyo, Adeyinka Adedipe, Gbenga Odogun, Animasahun Salman, James Abraham, Uche Okere, Chima Azubuike, Chigozie Chigozie and Patrick Odey

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Nigeria @66: No ambition worth setting Nigeria ablaze, Bamidele warns politicians

Published

on

The Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, has warned politicians against inflammatory rhetoric and other actions that could threaten Nigeria’s peace ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Bamidele, who is also the Chairman of the South-West Caucus in the National Assembly, urged political parties and their candidates to conduct their campaigns peacefully and in accordance with the Electoral Act, 2026 and the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

The Ekiti lawmaker spoke in a statement issued in Abuja on Thursday to commemorate Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary.

He acknowledged the right of political actors to exercise their political rights, but said such rights must be exercised within the confines of the law.

Bamidele warned that political freedom did not extend to hate speech, inflammatory comments or actions capable of triggering political unrest and ethno-religious violence before, during and after the elections.

He said, “The exercise of political rights at this defining moment should be guided by the rules of the electoral contest and not by the rules of the jungle. While every aspiration is legitimate in a democracy, it should be pursued with decorum, patriotism and utmost restraint.

“No ambition is worth setting the nation ablaze. As we mark our 66th anniversary of political freedom and prepare for the 2027 elections, political parties and their candidates must conduct their activities within the ambit of the law.

“Nigeria is our collective heritage. She is greater than the political ambition of any party or candidate. Our activities must be conducted to preserve our collective heritage and not destroy what we have sustainably built.

“As political parties and their candidates campaign across the states of the federation and unveil their agenda for the future of our fatherland, such an agenda must align with the wishes and aspirations of our founding fathers.”

See also  Osun poll: INEC adds SDP’s gov candidate Ajala to ballot

The Senate Leader’s warning comes as political parties and their candidates intensify preparations for the 2027 elections, with campaigns expected to dominate the political space in the months ahead.

The electioneering period has also been accompanied by reports of intimidation and the activities of political thugs in some parts of the country, raising concerns over the conduct of the elections.

Bamidele therefore urged political actors to prioritise national unity and democratic stability over personal and partisan ambitions.

He said Nigeria’s 66 years of independence should remind political leaders of the need to protect the country’s unity and democratic institutions as they seek electoral mandates.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Wike reveals he’ll resign if Tinubu loses FCT, Rivers in 2027, read details

Published

on

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Mr Nyesom Wike, has declared that he will step down from his cabinet position if President Bola Tinubu fails to secure victory in both the FCT and Rivers State in the 2027 presidential election.

Speaking during an engagement with leadership and members of the Apo Mechanics and Traders Association in Abuja, Wike stated that his continued tenure as a cabinet minister is directly tied to his ability to deliver political results for the President in his primary areas of influence.

In a statement issued on Wednesday by the Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication and Social Media to the minister, Lere Olayinka, Wike said that should the ruling party lose in the FCT and Rivers State at the presidential poll scheduled for January 16, 2027, he will formally tender his resignation the very next day.

“If I cannot deliver where I work, then I’m not worthy to be here,” Wike said, emphasising that his political mandate required concrete electoral success.

“If I lose FCT, I’m not supposed to be FCT Minister.

By January 17, 2027, I will announce my resignation as FCT Minister should the President lose in Rivers State and the FCT,” he added.

Outlining his political strategy for the territory, Wike revealed that the administration was building a multi-party coalition to secure victory across various elective offices in the FCT.

He explicitly endorsed candidates across legislative tiers while reiterating total support for the President’s re-election bid.

“Let us be clear on direction: for the Presidency, it is Bola Ahmed Tinubu! For the Senate, Philip Aduda is a man of the people, unlike those who only appear on television. The two House of Representatives candidates we are supporting are also here. They are former Area Council chairmen.

See also  APC members defect to NNPP in Kano

“In the FCT, we are running a unified coalition across parties to deliver results.

“If I cannot deliver FCT as minister, then I am not qualified to hold this office. We have a firm agreement, and today is the final affirmation,” Wike said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Gombe 2027: Pantami, Mailantarki, Garry enter fresh PDP ticket battle

Published

on

CHIMA AZUBUIKE examines the political dynamics surrounding the fresh Gombe State governorship primary holding Tuesday (today), which pits former minister Isa Pantami against Khamisu Mailantarki and Usman Garry

Today, former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Prof. Isa Pantami; businessman and politician Khamisu Mailantarki; and Usman Garry will again hit the field to battle for the Peoples Democratic Party governorship ticket in Gombe State for the 2027 election. The fresh governorship primary election complies with an order by the Federal High Court sitting in Gombe. The court, in a judgment on September 24, nullified the May 26 primary that produced Pantami, directing the PDP to conduct another exercise within 30 days, in compliance with its Constitution, guidelines and relevant electoral laws.

The judgment delivered by Justice Amina Mohammed followed a suit filed by Usman Garry, a PDP governorship aspirant, who challenged the process through which Pantami emerged as the party’s candidate. Garry objected to the affirmation of Pantami as the standard-bearer of the Abdulrahman Mohammed-led faction and eventually filed a suit against the former minister. Garry had asked the court to set aside Pantami’s emergence because the PDP did not conduct a valid governorship primary in accordance with its rules and applicable electoral laws.

The Federal High Court nullified the process that produced Pantami and ordered the PDP to conduct a fresh primary. The court found problems with the process that produced Pantami and directed the party to repeat the exercise in accordance with its guidelines and applicable electoral laws.

Before joining the PDP, the former minister had sought the governorship ticket of the All Progressives Congress. When the APC settled on Jamilu Gwamna as its consensus candidate, Pantami withdrew from the contest and subsequently moved to the PDP. His arrival immediately altered the calculations within the opposition party.

Pantami’s impending movement to the PDP circulated while Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir, Garry and Monica Kaltho were preparing for the party’s governorship contest.

Pantami will again slug it out with other aspirants, Mailantarki and Garry, who reject the former minister’s entry into the governorship ticket race.

Between Pantami, Mailantarki, and Garry

Pantami enters Tuesday’s contest as a politician whose national profile gives the primary a significance beyond the ordinary competition for a party ticket. A former Director-General of the National Information Technology Development Agency and former minister, Pantami boasts supporters who argue that his experience, networks and resources make him capable of mounting a serious challenge against the APC candidate, Gwamna.

Mohammed Kudu, a PDP chieftain, dismissed the capacity of some of the other aspirants to confront the governing party, describing Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir and Garry as weak to confront the APC candidate.

Kudu said, “Who among Khamisu Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir, Garry Usman has what it takes to challenge the APC? We recognise that Jamilu Gwamna is grassroots; hence, the only person that can face him, man to man, is Malam (Ali Pantami). He has made money as former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, and as former Director-General of NITDA and as a visiting lecturer. Maybe Saleh Abdulkadir, who seems genuine, but you know he is not as wealthy as he used to be.”

He added, “He (Ali Pantami) has the capacity to defeat Gwamna of APC in a fair contest because he has international connections and he has built enough capital in both human and other resources that translate into wealth. All that will count in the build-up to the election.”

Kudu’s comments reflect one side of the political argument surrounding the PDP contest: that the party needs a candidate with sufficient political, financial and organisational resources to confront the APC.

See also  Terrorist bello Turji’s threat: How families risk lives to enter Niger Republic — Sokoto residents

But that argument is contested by opponents of Pantami’s emergence.

For them, the issue is not simply whether Pantami possesses the resources or profile to contest the 2027 election. They question the circumstances surrounding his entry into the PDP and his rapid movement from APC aspirant to PDP governorship candidate.

Dr Maryam Abubakar, a policy analyst, described what she called the “unprecedented desperation” surrounding Pantami’s political journey.

She said, “How can you once say politics is dirty, only for late President Muhammadu Buhari to appoint you from NITDA to cabinet minister, and you suddenly forget your sermons where you lashed politics and politicians.”

Abubakar also questioned Pantami’s relationship with the APC before his defection.

She said the former minister, despite developing an interest in politics, failed to support the governing party sufficiently.

“Even when his interest began to manifest, he refused to empower the party members or support the party to achieve its mandate in the state. Instead, we started hearing rumours that Malam (Ali Pantami) was funding African Democratic Congress in Gombe but refused to identify with them publicly because of court cases ADC faced and alleged possible witch-hunt by the anti-graft body,” she added.

“How can you contest this week in APC and next week become a PDP candidate? It’s the height of desperation. As a technocrat and Islamic scholar, we expected a new order in the way of doing things, not doing things like regular politicians who lack ideals and purpose. What was baffling was allowing yourself to be a product of a corrupt process.”

So, the PDP held the May 26 primary amid misgivings. The decision to challenge the primary was therefore not unexpected.

Gombe’s political landscape is shaped by local structures and established political networks, while national visibility and access to influential political actors can also affect a candidate’s campaign.

The PDP’s choice will therefore be watched beyond the immediate party contest.

The Gombe PDP primary has consequently evolved from an ordinary intra-party contest into a test of how political ambition, party organisation and electoral law intersect.

Today’s exercise is, therefore, a bid to correct issues of the past. The PDP is now conducting a new nomination process, creating a fresh opportunity for all three cleared aspirants.

Although Saleh Abdulkadir was prominent in the initial contest and was mentioned among those who challenged Pantami’s emergence, the PDP’s current list of cleared aspirants for Tuesday’s primary comprises Pantami, Mailantarki and Garry.

That means the field has narrowed considerably from the wider contest that preceded the May primary.

Abdulkadir’s absence from the fresh contest further concentrates the battle among three political camps.

For the PDP, this may make the primary easier to organise, but it does not necessarily make the political dispute less complicated.

The principal disagreement remains over the process that brought Pantami into the party’s nomination race and the question of whether the fresh exercise can finally settle the matter.

For Pantami, it provides the opportunity to seek a new mandate from the party after his first nomination was nullified.

For Mailantarki and Garry, it offers the opportunity to challenge Pantami through a fresh process in which they have been cleared to participate.

And for the PDP, it presents another opportunity to conduct a process that can withstand judicial scrutiny.

Circumventing legalities

The legal questions surrounding Tuesday’s contest became complicated on September 24 when the Supreme Court restored provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 dealing with party membership registers and the nomination of candidates. The apex court upheld the validity of Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), reversing the earlier Court of Appeal position that had voided the provisions.

See also  APC members defect to NNPP in Kano

Section 77(5) requires that persons eligible to vote at party primaries must have their names contained in the membership register submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission within the prescribed period.

The controversy followed the timing of Pantami’s movement from the APC to the PDP.

According to the account supplied by Gombe public affairs commentator, Chika Udenkwo, Pantami left the APC on May 19, while the APC primary was held on May 21 and the PDP primary took place on May 26.

Udenkwo therefore argues that the key question is not simply whether Pantami defected from the APC before the PDP primary.

The more precise question, he says, is whether Pantami’s name appeared in the PDP membership register submitted to INEC within the statutory period applicable to the May 26 primary.

He said, “Pantami left the APC on May 19. The APC primary followed on May 21. And on May 26, Pantami emerged from the PDP primary.”

He added, “The question now is not simply whether he had left the APC before joining the PDP. The more precise question is this: Was Pantami’s name contained in the PDP membership register submitted to INEC within the statutory period applicable to the May 26 primary?”

According to Udenkwo, if May 26 is used as the reference date, the 21-day period would take the relevant deadline back to May 5.

“That makes the documentary evidence critical. Was Pantami already a PDP member by that date? Was his name on the register submitted to INEC? When exactly was that register submitted? And was the same register actually used for the May 26 primary?” he asked.

Those questions, however, must be distinguished from the legal effect of the September 24 Supreme Court judgment itself.

The Supreme Court’s ruling restored the provisions; it did not, by itself, pronounce on Pantami’s individual eligibility for Tuesday’s Gombe primary.

As today’s fresh primary holds, one of the questions includes whether the party has complied with the applicable requirements for the new primary, including membership records, notice, screening, participation and its own guidelines.

The membership-register question could nevertheless become significant if a litigant argues that an aspirant or delegate was not properly qualified under the restored provisions.

On the contention, Udenkwo argued, “A victory on Tuesday would give Pantami a fresh nomination, not a reliance on the May 26 exercise that has already been nullified.

“But that victory would still have to survive any subsequent legal challenge—one based on compliance with the Electoral Act, the PDP Constitution, the court’s order, and the applicable membership register.”

He added, “In other words: winning the primary and establishing the legal validity of the nomination are related—but distinct—questions. That reasoning also applies to Mailantarki and Garry.

“If either defeats Pantami, the resulting nomination would equally be subject to the statutory and party requirements governing the fresh primary.”

For Mailantarki and Garry, Tuesday’s contest is an opportunity to reset a process that both have spent months challenging.

Their opposition to Pantami’s emergence was not limited to political statements. Their objections eventually formed part of the litigation that produced the Federal High Court’s order for a fresh primary.

The two now have to shift from challenging the previous process to competing within the new one. That presents a different political calculation.

Instead of asking the court to remove Pantami from a ticket already produced by the party, they must now persuade delegates or eligible party members to choose either of them over the former minister.

See also  Dele Farotimi dismisses Jonathan’s political return, urges focus on these structural problems

The question therefore becomes whether the legal challenge has translated into political momentum.

Mailantarki’s position has also been affected by the withdrawal of Kaltho, who had initially been part of the challenge before later aligning with Pantami.

Kaltho’s movement altered the political arithmetic around the opposition to Pantami, leaving Mailantarki, Garry and Abdulkadir among the figures challenging the earlier emergence.

Whether that change will have an effect on Tuesday’s voting remains a political question to be answered by the primary.

A primary under scrutiny

The September 29 exercise is also taking place under a level of scrutiny that the May primary did not successfully withstand.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, restored statutory provisions concerning party membership registers and nomination procedures.

Political observers are consequently watching not only the outcome but the process.

Tuesday’s primary presents a credibility test for the PDP.

The party has already experienced the consequences of an internal nomination process that ended in litigation.

The Federal High Court’s order provides the party with an opportunity to correct the procedural issues that led to the nullification of the earlier exercise.

Udenkwo said, “The question becomes whether the PDP has complied with the requirements applicable to this fresh primary: the membership register, notice, screening, delegate participation, and the party’s own constitution and guidelines.”

He added, “And here, the Supreme Court’s ruling makes the membership register particularly significant. The law does not merely require a party to maintain a register. It requires that register to be submitted to INEC within the prescribed period—and it restricts participation in the primary to persons whose names appear in it.”

Today, the PDP will have to be able to demonstrate compliance with the court order and the applicable electoral framework.

The scrutiny will extend to the eligibility of delegates, the party’s register and the conduct of the exercise.

Udenkwo said, “The Supreme Court has now made the statutory validity of Sections 77 and 84 clear. What it has not done is determine the factual circumstances of every candidate or every primary conducted before its judgment.”

“That leaves room for litigation—where an aspirant believes a party failed to comply with the membership-register requirements or other statutory conditions,” he added.

For now, however, the PDP’s immediate responsibility is to conduct the fresh exercise ordered by the Federal High Court.

For Pantami, Tuesday offers a second opportunity to secure the party’s ticket through a fresh primary. For Mailantarki and Garry, it offers a second opportunity to challenge him directly rather than through the previous process. For the PDP, it offers the chance to close a chapter that has already generated substantial internal disagreement and legal action.

But whether Tuesday finally closes that chapter will depend not only on who wins, but on how the party conducts the exercise.

The 2027 question

Tuesday’s primary cannot be viewed entirely in isolation from the wider 2027 contest.

The APC has already positioned Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The contest is therefore framed along the line of having a candidate that can challenge the APC in the general election.

For Kudu, Pantami’s national profile and network give him the capacity to confront Gwamna.

But the argument also exposes one of the central issues before PDP delegates: whether the choice of candidate should be determined primarily by political experience, organisational structure, personal resources, grassroots networks, national connections or some combination of these factors.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending