Connect with us

News

Read how US is using cash, threats to dump migrants in Africa

Published

on

It began with threats of US visa bans on a swathe of African nations. Then Washington started to scatter migrants from all over the world to various corners of the continent, often with cash sweeteners for their governments.

Cambodian Pheap Rom, 43, ended up in a notorious high-security prison in tiny Eswatini, which is run with an iron fist by King Mswati III. “I didn’t understand why I was being expelled to Africa since I’m Cambodian,” he told AFP.

Others were sent to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda; others still dropped off the radar after being sent to war-torn South Sudan.

The United States is using visa bans and restrictions on African countries to strongarm them into taking people from third countries as part of Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigration, two former State Department officials told AFP.

Lawyers say deportees have been thrown into a “legal black hole”, held without charge in countries where they have no ties and few if any rights.

Even those deported to stable democracies like Ghana have been abused, dumped without papers by security forces in neighbouring Togo.

Two-thirds of the 39 countries hit by the Trump administration’s full or partial travel bans are in Africa — as are nearly half of nations that have struck murky deportation deals with Washington, according to US Senators and NGOs.

Trump’s third-country deportations plan is the brainchild of his hardline anti-immigration adviser Stephen Miller and his Homeland Security Council, the ex-State Department officials said.

The White House did not respond to the allegations, with the State Department only telling AFP that “implementing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies is a top priority.

“We remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America’s border security,” it added.

• Official ‘human trafficking’ –

The first wave of the mass deportations during Trump’s second term concentrated on Central and South America. Asylum seekers were sent to Panama and at least 250 Venezuelans, accused of being gang members — many on flimsy evidence and without due process — were sent to El Salvador’s gigantic Terrorism Confinement Centre known as CECOT.

Africa has since emerged as a second wave, with Washington wielding the stick of visa bans while offering the carrot of millions of dollars to countries like Equatorial Guinea, according to Democratic Senators.

Eswatini — Africa’s last absolute monarchy — has agreed to take 160 deportees in exchange for 7.5-million aid deal for 250 people, according to Human Rights Watch.

 

 

“It’s like modern-day human trafficking, through official channels,” Tin Thanh Nguyen, a US-based lawyer, told AFP.

• Deported despite torture fears –

Trump’s second term has seen a vast expansion of who can be deported as well as a shutting down of legal pathways to the US.

Last month the Supreme Court backed his decision to do away with a 36-year-old rule that has protected 350,000 Haitians from being sent back to their gang-ravaged homeland.

Many of the people shunted onto deportation flights in the middle of the night had legal protections under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) or other safeguards, according to testimonies collected by AFP over the past year.

They were only informed of their expulsion on board the plane, without knowing their destination. Handcuffed and unable to call their lawyers, some were beaten for resisting.

Unlike people with firmer rights, such as asylum, those with torture or “withholding of removal” protections still have an active deportation order hanging over them — though in the past this often allowed them to legally live and work in the United States.

When 23-year-old Khalid, who said he had fled torture in East Africa, crossed the Mexican border in 2024, a judge welcomed him into the US, wishing him success in his new life as he granted him protection from deportation.

But he was deported without any documents to Equatorial Guinea in January — which is regularly criticised for human rights abuses — and is now stuck in a Kafkaesque situation.

See also  EFCC appeals judgment ordering release of 27 seized properties

The government of the Spanish-speaking Central African petro-state told him he couldn’t stay, and at the end of May he was put on a plane back to his home country. But border officials there turned him around because he didn’t have travel documents. He’s now back in Equatorial Guinea, unable to leave, and unable to request asylum, because it does not exist there, according to the UNHCR.

Another East African in a similar situation was threatening to kill himself, AFP was told.

“They don’t know if we’re alive or not” and they don’t seem to care, Khalid said of the US officials who oversaw his deportation.

• American families destroyed –

“I don’t know any immigration attorneys who were advising their clients who got granted CAT or withholding (of removal), ‘Be careful, you could be deported to a third country,’” said Meredyth Yoon, a US immigration lawyer. “It was, ‘You won.’”

 

 

But the Trump administration is now arguing that since the protections only bar them from being sent to their country of origin, they can still be sent anywhere else — including to Equatorial Guinea and Ghana, which have then immediately shipped deportees home.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement views those with withholding or CAT protection — including those granted it for gender-based violence — as “low hanging fruit”, said Alma David, another immigration attorney, whose clients have been scattered to South Sudan, Eswatini, Cameroon and the DR Congo. “It’s logistically relatively easy for ICE to deport them to a third country,” she added.

Other deportees who have ended up in Africa had been living in the US for decades. Cuban-born plumber Roberto Mosquera — who has been in Florida since he was a child — was even a “super Trump supporter”, according to his daughter Monica.

He lost his residency after being jailed for shooting a man in the leg in a gang fight when he was a teenager.

But “when Roberto came out (of jail), he changed his life,” said Ada, a family friend who spoke to AFP under a pseudonym for fear of US government retaliation. “He got married, had four beautiful little girls. He talks out against gang violence” that got him caught up in the criminal justice system, Ada said.

But neither that nor his love for Trump stopped him from being sent to Africa.

ICE picked him up at his annual check-in, and he disappeared for weeks, the government telling his family he had been sent to Cuba, which rarely accepts its nationals. Ada recognised her friend in a photograph posted on X by then US by then Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin.

Her department even falsely branded him a “murderer”, his daughter told reporters, calling him “one of the worst of the worst”.

The plumber was sent to a fearsome maximum-security prison in Eswatini — formerly known as Swaziland — where he is still being held without charge a year later. When Mosquera’s family saw him during a video call from the jail, he had lost hair and “gotten very thin”, Ada said.

For decades the prison has become a byword for repression under King Mswati, who has ruled the small southern African nation for 40 years, routinely used to silence critics and pro-democracy activists.

Rom the Cambodian was also held in the same prison, and said for two months he and fellow deportees “went through misery” — allowed outdoors for only 15 minutes a day and given one weekly phone call.

• US ‘washing their hands’ of them –

Those sent to Ghana were held in secret at a remote military base without charges. Some were dumped in Togo without documents, while others, including a bisexual Gambian man, were sent home, according to US court filings. Gambia criminalises homosexuality, and the man went into hiding.

“Once they’re out of US hands, you can do with them whatever you want,” one ex-State Department official told AFP of what he saw. “Hands washed. That’s how the administration approached it.”

See also  Boko Haram issues 72-hour ultimatum over 416 captives

For lawyer Yoon, however, Washington is using African countries to carry out deportations it is legally barred from carrying out itself.

“These governments are receiving money from the US for the purpose of processing individuals who are deported there, just to be deported back to their countries — it’s chain refoulement and that is illegal,” she told AFP.

In both the DR Congo and Cameroon, US lawyer David said the International Organisation for Migration is pressuring deportees to sign up for its “voluntary” programme to be sent home.

“They’ve got us cornered because they tell us: ‘If you don’t accept the repatriation programme, you’ll be stuck in a mess here in Congo,’” said Colombian Gabriela, 30, who AFP met in April when she was kept in a hotel with other deportees near Kinshasa airport, where “several of (her) friends have taken ill”.

“I didn’t want to go to Congo. I’m scared,” she added.

Reports David has heard from clients in Cameroon are even grimmer: the IOM has refused to facilitate medical care for some detainees, the lawyer said.

But the IOM insisted the “humanitarian assistance to migrants” it provides is “strictly voluntary and based on informed consent.”

 

 

• Visa ‘blackmail’ –

As the Trump administration moved to ban or to tighten visas for foreigners, countries were given metrics to reach to avoid the sanctions, one former State Department official told AFP.

Some were not necessarily controversial: requests to share data on known criminals, encourage people not to overstay their visas, work with the US to receive their own nationals slated for deportation.

But it became clear that the best way to curb the restrictions was to take in third-country nationals, the official said.

“I don’t know a single country that managed to move off the list because of stuff they did besides an agreement” to take third-country deportees or asylum seekers who showed up at the US border, the former official said.

Burkina Faso, ruled by a junta hostile to the West, has refused to take in people expelled by the US.

“Is this a way to put pressure on us? Is this blackmail?” Foreign Affairs Minister Karamoko Jean-Marie Traore asked in October when the US abruptly stopped processing visas at its embassy in the capital, Ouagadougou.

“Whatever it is… Burkina Faso is a place of dignity… not a place of expulsion,” Traore added. His country was soon hit with a travel ban.

A former Nigerian government official told AFP that when Abuja rebuffed US overtures to take in Venezuelans last year, “we knew there would be consequences”. Visa restrictions soon followed.

Yet many African nations were willing to play ball with the US, tightening visas worldwide, the two ex-State Department officials said.

Shortly after Ghana started taking in West African deportees, Washington reversed its visa restrictions and lifted a 15 percent tariff on its cocoa and agricultural exports.

But even doing a deportation deal has not helped Equatorial Guinea escape its travel ban.

• ‘Legal black hole’ –

These deals have been shrouded in secrecy with the number of people deported — and the countries taking them — not been made public.

 

 

At least nine African governments have taken, or have agreed to take, deportees out of the 25 agreements struck across the world, according to an investigation by Senate Democrats.

“Countries are being pressured with threats of tariffs, visa bans or cuts to assistance,” they said.

One tally by nonprofit groups said 40 per cent of confirmed or alleged deals are with African states — 14 out of 34 countries.

What is more, the Senate report didn’t include Sierra Leone, which took its first deportees in May or the Central African Republic, which took deportees, including from Iran, in June.

Often, lawyers don’t know where their clients are even held.

Nguyen told AFP all he knows of his clients sent to South Sudan is that they’re at “an undisclosed location” and “guarded by soldiers”.

See also  Companies sink N401bn into alternative power in three months due to blackouts

Not all of the deportees had protections preventing them from being sent home — but were sent to third countries anyway.

Rom, the Cambodian sent to Eswatini in October, served 15 years in a US prison after pleading guilty to attempted murder, after firing a gun during two neighbourhood disputes.

After serving his time, instead of being deported to Cambodia, he was sent to the southern African nation and locked up without charge for months.

Nguyen suspects the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) didn’t even try to send Rom to Cambodia, which has in the past refused deportations from the US. At one point, the DHS publicly insisted he had been sent to Thailand, the country of his birth, but where he doesn’t hold citizenship, before finally acknowledging he had been flown to Eswatini.

Its most notorious prison has become “a legal black hole”, Nguyen said, where deportees face indefinite detention with no access to lawyers, despite an Eswatini Supreme Court ruling that they were entitled to legal representation.

• No let up –

The message the Trump administration was sending to countries unwilling to play ball, the lawyer argued, was that “if you don’t issue the travel documents, look what I’ll do to your nationals.”

ICE did not dispute Nguyen’s allegations, and insisted in a statement to AFP that third-country agreements “are essential to the safety of our homeland and the American people.”

Rom was finally able to return to Phnom Penh, where AFP was able to speak to him in April.

Even faced with legal pushback, the Trump administration has not backed down.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant who became a symbol of Trump’s mass deportations, has been threatened with being sent to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana and Liberia after having been mistakenly deported to El Salvador. Despite a US judge dropping the criminal charges against him in May, he is still at risk of being expelled.

When a US judge ruled one woman’s deportation to DR Congo had been illegal because the Congolese government had said it wouldn’t be able to provide her adequate medical care, the US claimed it would be too dangerous to bring her back because of the Ebola outbreak there.

• Policy of ‘xenophobia’ –

Several third-country deportation programmes were set up, one of the State Department sources told AFP. One targets nationals whose countries wouldn’t take them back, one to clear a “backlog” of asylum seekers, and another for those who had been convicted of a crime and were finishing their sentences.

But there was no real “guiding philosophy, it was just xenophobia”, the source said.

 

 

When a US judge ruled that Benjamin, a Nigerian green card holder married to an American citizen, was entitled to torture protections, he was looking forward to reuniting with his family.

He had served two years in prison for a fraud conspiracy and was put into deportation proceedings. But a judge ruled he was entitled to protections because of his past involvement in the often dangerous world of Nigerian politics.

Instead, he was sent to Ghana.

Benjamin and other deportees were held at a military base outside the capital. Those around him fell sick, exposed to relentless mosquitoes.

As the government came under pressure from lawyers seeking their release, he and several others were driven to the border and dumped in Togo without documents, where the situation was “terrible”, he told AFP in September.

“I did my time for what I did,” Benjamin said. But the Trump administration “violated the judge’s orders.”

Another deportation flight landed in the Ghanaian capital in May.

An AFP reporter wasn’t allowed into the heavily guarded Accra hotel where the deportees were reportedly being held.

Staff said it was fully booked.

But there would be plenty of vacancies if she came back in two days, an employee added.

AFP

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Edo Records Decline In Cultism Cases As Okpebholo Marks 1 Year In Office

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  FG plans 500 CNG stations to cut petrol use

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  BBC to cut 2,000 jobs — Report

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Shettima urges 50% reduction in road crash deaths by 2030

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Tinubu’s New Year message (Full Text)

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  EFCC appeals judgment ordering release of 27 seized properties

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Trump says he wants three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Amotekun intercepts suspicious truck in Ondo, arrests 38 passengers

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending