Connect with us

News

Read how US is using cash, threats to dump migrants in Africa

Published

on

It began with threats of US visa bans on a swathe of African nations. Then Washington started to scatter migrants from all over the world to various corners of the continent, often with cash sweeteners for their governments.

Cambodian Pheap Rom, 43, ended up in a notorious high-security prison in tiny Eswatini, which is run with an iron fist by King Mswati III. “I didn’t understand why I was being expelled to Africa since I’m Cambodian,” he told AFP.

Others were sent to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda; others still dropped off the radar after being sent to war-torn South Sudan.

The United States is using visa bans and restrictions on African countries to strongarm them into taking people from third countries as part of Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigration, two former State Department officials told AFP.

Lawyers say deportees have been thrown into a “legal black hole”, held without charge in countries where they have no ties and few if any rights.

Even those deported to stable democracies like Ghana have been abused, dumped without papers by security forces in neighbouring Togo.

Two-thirds of the 39 countries hit by the Trump administration’s full or partial travel bans are in Africa — as are nearly half of nations that have struck murky deportation deals with Washington, according to US Senators and NGOs.

Trump’s third-country deportations plan is the brainchild of his hardline anti-immigration adviser Stephen Miller and his Homeland Security Council, the ex-State Department officials said.

The White House did not respond to the allegations, with the State Department only telling AFP that “implementing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies is a top priority.

“We remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America’s border security,” it added.

• Official ‘human trafficking’ –

The first wave of the mass deportations during Trump’s second term concentrated on Central and South America. Asylum seekers were sent to Panama and at least 250 Venezuelans, accused of being gang members — many on flimsy evidence and without due process — were sent to El Salvador’s gigantic Terrorism Confinement Centre known as CECOT.

Africa has since emerged as a second wave, with Washington wielding the stick of visa bans while offering the carrot of millions of dollars to countries like Equatorial Guinea, according to Democratic Senators.

Eswatini — Africa’s last absolute monarchy — has agreed to take 160 deportees in exchange for 7.5-million aid deal for 250 people, according to Human Rights Watch.

 

 

“It’s like modern-day human trafficking, through official channels,” Tin Thanh Nguyen, a US-based lawyer, told AFP.

• Deported despite torture fears –

Trump’s second term has seen a vast expansion of who can be deported as well as a shutting down of legal pathways to the US.

Last month the Supreme Court backed his decision to do away with a 36-year-old rule that has protected 350,000 Haitians from being sent back to their gang-ravaged homeland.

Many of the people shunted onto deportation flights in the middle of the night had legal protections under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) or other safeguards, according to testimonies collected by AFP over the past year.

They were only informed of their expulsion on board the plane, without knowing their destination. Handcuffed and unable to call their lawyers, some were beaten for resisting.

Unlike people with firmer rights, such as asylum, those with torture or “withholding of removal” protections still have an active deportation order hanging over them — though in the past this often allowed them to legally live and work in the United States.

When 23-year-old Khalid, who said he had fled torture in East Africa, crossed the Mexican border in 2024, a judge welcomed him into the US, wishing him success in his new life as he granted him protection from deportation.

But he was deported without any documents to Equatorial Guinea in January — which is regularly criticised for human rights abuses — and is now stuck in a Kafkaesque situation.

See also  Tinubu swears in Amupitan as new INEC chairman

The government of the Spanish-speaking Central African petro-state told him he couldn’t stay, and at the end of May he was put on a plane back to his home country. But border officials there turned him around because he didn’t have travel documents. He’s now back in Equatorial Guinea, unable to leave, and unable to request asylum, because it does not exist there, according to the UNHCR.

Another East African in a similar situation was threatening to kill himself, AFP was told.

“They don’t know if we’re alive or not” and they don’t seem to care, Khalid said of the US officials who oversaw his deportation.

• American families destroyed –

“I don’t know any immigration attorneys who were advising their clients who got granted CAT or withholding (of removal), ‘Be careful, you could be deported to a third country,’” said Meredyth Yoon, a US immigration lawyer. “It was, ‘You won.’”

 

 

But the Trump administration is now arguing that since the protections only bar them from being sent to their country of origin, they can still be sent anywhere else — including to Equatorial Guinea and Ghana, which have then immediately shipped deportees home.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement views those with withholding or CAT protection — including those granted it for gender-based violence — as “low hanging fruit”, said Alma David, another immigration attorney, whose clients have been scattered to South Sudan, Eswatini, Cameroon and the DR Congo. “It’s logistically relatively easy for ICE to deport them to a third country,” she added.

Other deportees who have ended up in Africa had been living in the US for decades. Cuban-born plumber Roberto Mosquera — who has been in Florida since he was a child — was even a “super Trump supporter”, according to his daughter Monica.

He lost his residency after being jailed for shooting a man in the leg in a gang fight when he was a teenager.

But “when Roberto came out (of jail), he changed his life,” said Ada, a family friend who spoke to AFP under a pseudonym for fear of US government retaliation. “He got married, had four beautiful little girls. He talks out against gang violence” that got him caught up in the criminal justice system, Ada said.

But neither that nor his love for Trump stopped him from being sent to Africa.

ICE picked him up at his annual check-in, and he disappeared for weeks, the government telling his family he had been sent to Cuba, which rarely accepts its nationals. Ada recognised her friend in a photograph posted on X by then US by then Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin.

Her department even falsely branded him a “murderer”, his daughter told reporters, calling him “one of the worst of the worst”.

The plumber was sent to a fearsome maximum-security prison in Eswatini — formerly known as Swaziland — where he is still being held without charge a year later. When Mosquera’s family saw him during a video call from the jail, he had lost hair and “gotten very thin”, Ada said.

For decades the prison has become a byword for repression under King Mswati, who has ruled the small southern African nation for 40 years, routinely used to silence critics and pro-democracy activists.

Rom the Cambodian was also held in the same prison, and said for two months he and fellow deportees “went through misery” — allowed outdoors for only 15 minutes a day and given one weekly phone call.

• US ‘washing their hands’ of them –

Those sent to Ghana were held in secret at a remote military base without charges. Some were dumped in Togo without documents, while others, including a bisexual Gambian man, were sent home, according to US court filings. Gambia criminalises homosexuality, and the man went into hiding.

“Once they’re out of US hands, you can do with them whatever you want,” one ex-State Department official told AFP of what he saw. “Hands washed. That’s how the administration approached it.”

See also  Six Dead, 23 Injured in Lagos–Ibadan Expressway Crash

For lawyer Yoon, however, Washington is using African countries to carry out deportations it is legally barred from carrying out itself.

“These governments are receiving money from the US for the purpose of processing individuals who are deported there, just to be deported back to their countries — it’s chain refoulement and that is illegal,” she told AFP.

In both the DR Congo and Cameroon, US lawyer David said the International Organisation for Migration is pressuring deportees to sign up for its “voluntary” programme to be sent home.

“They’ve got us cornered because they tell us: ‘If you don’t accept the repatriation programme, you’ll be stuck in a mess here in Congo,’” said Colombian Gabriela, 30, who AFP met in April when she was kept in a hotel with other deportees near Kinshasa airport, where “several of (her) friends have taken ill”.

“I didn’t want to go to Congo. I’m scared,” she added.

Reports David has heard from clients in Cameroon are even grimmer: the IOM has refused to facilitate medical care for some detainees, the lawyer said.

But the IOM insisted the “humanitarian assistance to migrants” it provides is “strictly voluntary and based on informed consent.”

 

 

• Visa ‘blackmail’ –

As the Trump administration moved to ban or to tighten visas for foreigners, countries were given metrics to reach to avoid the sanctions, one former State Department official told AFP.

Some were not necessarily controversial: requests to share data on known criminals, encourage people not to overstay their visas, work with the US to receive their own nationals slated for deportation.

But it became clear that the best way to curb the restrictions was to take in third-country nationals, the official said.

“I don’t know a single country that managed to move off the list because of stuff they did besides an agreement” to take third-country deportees or asylum seekers who showed up at the US border, the former official said.

Burkina Faso, ruled by a junta hostile to the West, has refused to take in people expelled by the US.

“Is this a way to put pressure on us? Is this blackmail?” Foreign Affairs Minister Karamoko Jean-Marie Traore asked in October when the US abruptly stopped processing visas at its embassy in the capital, Ouagadougou.

“Whatever it is… Burkina Faso is a place of dignity… not a place of expulsion,” Traore added. His country was soon hit with a travel ban.

A former Nigerian government official told AFP that when Abuja rebuffed US overtures to take in Venezuelans last year, “we knew there would be consequences”. Visa restrictions soon followed.

Yet many African nations were willing to play ball with the US, tightening visas worldwide, the two ex-State Department officials said.

Shortly after Ghana started taking in West African deportees, Washington reversed its visa restrictions and lifted a 15 percent tariff on its cocoa and agricultural exports.

But even doing a deportation deal has not helped Equatorial Guinea escape its travel ban.

• ‘Legal black hole’ –

These deals have been shrouded in secrecy with the number of people deported — and the countries taking them — not been made public.

 

 

At least nine African governments have taken, or have agreed to take, deportees out of the 25 agreements struck across the world, according to an investigation by Senate Democrats.

“Countries are being pressured with threats of tariffs, visa bans or cuts to assistance,” they said.

One tally by nonprofit groups said 40 per cent of confirmed or alleged deals are with African states — 14 out of 34 countries.

What is more, the Senate report didn’t include Sierra Leone, which took its first deportees in May or the Central African Republic, which took deportees, including from Iran, in June.

Often, lawyers don’t know where their clients are even held.

Nguyen told AFP all he knows of his clients sent to South Sudan is that they’re at “an undisclosed location” and “guarded by soldiers”.

See also  FG cancels $717m World Bank power loan amid blackouts; read details

Not all of the deportees had protections preventing them from being sent home — but were sent to third countries anyway.

Rom, the Cambodian sent to Eswatini in October, served 15 years in a US prison after pleading guilty to attempted murder, after firing a gun during two neighbourhood disputes.

After serving his time, instead of being deported to Cambodia, he was sent to the southern African nation and locked up without charge for months.

Nguyen suspects the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) didn’t even try to send Rom to Cambodia, which has in the past refused deportations from the US. At one point, the DHS publicly insisted he had been sent to Thailand, the country of his birth, but where he doesn’t hold citizenship, before finally acknowledging he had been flown to Eswatini.

Its most notorious prison has become “a legal black hole”, Nguyen said, where deportees face indefinite detention with no access to lawyers, despite an Eswatini Supreme Court ruling that they were entitled to legal representation.

• No let up –

The message the Trump administration was sending to countries unwilling to play ball, the lawyer argued, was that “if you don’t issue the travel documents, look what I’ll do to your nationals.”

ICE did not dispute Nguyen’s allegations, and insisted in a statement to AFP that third-country agreements “are essential to the safety of our homeland and the American people.”

Rom was finally able to return to Phnom Penh, where AFP was able to speak to him in April.

Even faced with legal pushback, the Trump administration has not backed down.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant who became a symbol of Trump’s mass deportations, has been threatened with being sent to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana and Liberia after having been mistakenly deported to El Salvador. Despite a US judge dropping the criminal charges against him in May, he is still at risk of being expelled.

When a US judge ruled one woman’s deportation to DR Congo had been illegal because the Congolese government had said it wouldn’t be able to provide her adequate medical care, the US claimed it would be too dangerous to bring her back because of the Ebola outbreak there.

• Policy of ‘xenophobia’ –

Several third-country deportation programmes were set up, one of the State Department sources told AFP. One targets nationals whose countries wouldn’t take them back, one to clear a “backlog” of asylum seekers, and another for those who had been convicted of a crime and were finishing their sentences.

But there was no real “guiding philosophy, it was just xenophobia”, the source said.

 

 

When a US judge ruled that Benjamin, a Nigerian green card holder married to an American citizen, was entitled to torture protections, he was looking forward to reuniting with his family.

He had served two years in prison for a fraud conspiracy and was put into deportation proceedings. But a judge ruled he was entitled to protections because of his past involvement in the often dangerous world of Nigerian politics.

Instead, he was sent to Ghana.

Benjamin and other deportees were held at a military base outside the capital. Those around him fell sick, exposed to relentless mosquitoes.

As the government came under pressure from lawyers seeking their release, he and several others were driven to the border and dumped in Togo without documents, where the situation was “terrible”, he told AFP in September.

“I did my time for what I did,” Benjamin said. But the Trump administration “violated the judge’s orders.”

Another deportation flight landed in the Ghanaian capital in May.

An AFP reporter wasn’t allowed into the heavily guarded Accra hotel where the deportees were reportedly being held.

Staff said it was fully booked.

But there would be plenty of vacancies if she came back in two days, an employee added.

AFP

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  No pact with Atiku, Obi, Jonathan in 2027 says ADC faction

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Tinubu swears in Amupitan as new INEC chairman

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  FBI offering $100,000 reward for information to arrest Charlie Kirk's k!ller

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Former minister, ex-PDP chairman Audu Ogbeh dies at 78

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  PDP convenes emergency meeting after court halts convention

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Former minister, ex-PDP chairman Audu Ogbeh dies at 78

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending