Connect with us

News

Insecurity: Nigerians urge swift action amid Trump’s threat

Published

on

Reactions have continued to trail President Donald Trump of the United States’s threat of military action, with a cross section of Nigerians urging the administration of President Bola Tinubu to take immediate decisive action against terrorists.

This appeal comes after President Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, CPC, and his accompanying threat to deploy American military forces over alleged large-scale persecution and killings of Christians.

It was reports that President Trump declared Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, CPC, in response to allegations of widespread persecution and genocide against Christians.

Trump further threatened that he had asked the Defence Department to prepare for possible military action in Nigeria if the Nigerian government “continues to allow the killing of Christians”.

President Bola Tinubu, in response, stated that the characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant did not reflect the country’s national reality.

Tinubu equally stated that the characterisation failed to account for the government’s “consistent and sincere efforts to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians”.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also vowed that Nigeria would continue to fight violent extremism, while expressing hope that the US would remain a close ally in the fight.

Other countries and world leaders have risen in defence of Nigeria and cautioned Trump against any direct or indirect military action capable of destabilising the entire West African subregion.

ECOWAS strongly rejected what it called “these false and dangerous claims” that a “Christian genocide” is taking place in Nigeria and the West African region.

It also said terrorist-related violence did not discriminate based on gender, religion, ethnicity, or age.

In the same vein, The Chinese government has pledged its firm support to the President Bola Tinubu administration amid threats of military action by United States President Donald Trump.

Spokesperson of China’s foreign ministry, Mao Ning, said China firmly opposes any country using religion and human rights as an excuse to interfere in other countries’ internal affairs, and threatening other countries with sanctions and force.

“As Nigeria’s strategic partner, China opposes any attempt by foreign powers to use religion or human rights as a pretext to meddle in another country’s internal affairs or impose sanctions and military threats,” Ning said.

The EU Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Anouar El Anouni, stated that the union had “taken note” of the statements by the US administration but remained focused on supporting Nigeria’s stability through cooperation.

“We respect Nigeria’s sovereignty and constitutional commitment to religious neutrality. Our position is one of solidarity with Nigeria.

“Solidarity with the victims of violence, with the authorities working to protect citizens, and with the Nigerian people, who overwhelmingly desire peaceful coexistence beyond ethnic and religious divides,” he said.

See also  Lagos pays N701m insurance benefits to families of deceased workers

While some Nigerians hailed Trump’s warning, saying it was the reflection of the longstanding realities in the country, others alleged that commentators were misrepresenting his message.

Speaking , Mr Anyebe Ekainu said too many innocent lives have been wasted in Nigeria, stressing that if President Trump intends to act, he should act now without further delay before no one is left anymore.

“We have had more than our fair share of bloodletting in this country. A lot of Christians have been killed, especially in Benue, Kaduna, Plateau, Adamawa and Taraba States. What about those killed in the church attack in Owo? The list is endless,” he said.

A social critic, Mike Divine, blasted analysts who according to him were taking President Trump’s statement out of context.

“Those arguing against Trump’s position should explain why Leah Sharibu of the Chibok schoolgirls’ abduction is still missing till date.

“They should also explain the presence of the mass grave displayed by Plateau pastor Rev. Ezekiel Dachomo, where scores of victims were buried. We are told that facts are sacred while comments are free,” he said.

Programme Director of CLEEN Foundation, Salaudeen Hashim, who also said, decried that it was the second time Nigeria is coming under the designation of ‘Country of Particular Concern’, describing it as an unfortunate stigmatization.

Hashim said that terrorism and insecurity do not select their victims, stating that It is very important to have people who can have strategic communication and offer the realities on ground.

He also lamented that Nigeria has not had diplomatic representation in most countries across the globe in the last two years, stressing that Nigeria’s diplomatic relationship has to be strengthened.

“Our diplomatic relationships need to be strengthened and we need to look at our foreign policy. It has not been getting us anywhere and we need to look into that.

“Also, we need to define our international interest, every country has what we call strategic national interest and sometimes it is not negotiable. What is our strategic national interest and I think it’s important for foreign affairs to make this clear.

“Finally, we have had terrorism charges going on, those who have been called perpetrators will need to deal with that very quickly and lastly, we need to step up our intelligence in target counter terrorism and prevent the occurrence of what is currently on ground,” he said.

Michael Akor stated that Donald Trump’s recent statement to intervene in the ceaseless insecurity in Nigeria, with specific reference to Christians genocide is a welcome development.

“As a concerned citizen of Nigeria whose major passion is to witness a country devoid of acrimonies, restiveness, banditry and extremism, I deem it as an answered prayer.

See also  Tinubu swears in Doro, Udeh as ministers

“Nigeria is of course , a sovereign nation, but sovereignty doesn’t mean total absence of interference by a more sovereign Nation. When the sovereignty of a nation becomes shaky, concerned nations can help in restoring solidity and balance to her sovereignty,” he said.

Ibrahim Mohammed also welcomed the idea so as to nip insecurity in the bud permanently from Nigeria.

“It’s really denigrating that a supposed giant of Africa (Nigeria) has continued to remain trapped in the fangs of religious genocide, banditry, tribal unrest, kidnapping and other forms of maimings.

“It’s even heart-aching that these grievous mishaps inflicted on innocent citizens are usually trivialized and politicized, hence successive governments have continued to allow them to look like normal fates or deserved happenings in Nigeria.

“The sighs of the average citizens who are victims of these heinous crimes against humanity are always given cold shoulders by Nigerian leaders, since they are well armed with security agents that shield them and their family members from falling as victims like the common citizens,” he lamented.

In the same vein, Abdul Rahman said since Nigerian leaders have failed to curb the menace, the intervention of external bodies becomes pertinent, adding that this makes the planned intervention of the US President, Donald Trump a good step in the right direction.

“Donald Trump’s statement which tagged Nigeria as a nation of concern, is a big slap on the faces of our leaders. This exposes them as weak and sterile leaders. If I were them, I would bury my head in shame.

“This genocide has continued unabated for donkey years, yet no proactive and decisive steps from our leaders to truncate it. The best our leaders always do is to release press statements condemning a genocide, then they go and sleep and wait for another attack to release another toothless press statement condemning the attacks.

“The obvious lackadaisical and careless attitudes our leaders have continued to display in the face of such grievous crimes against humanity, are enough to stair the intervention of external bodies, lest Nigerians wake up one day and realize that more than half of the citizens have been wiped out by the pampered marauders,” he said.

According to Anthony Ameh, “Since Donald Trump issued this important warning, a lot of people in the political circles have been fidgeting and devising defensive tactics to condemn Trump.

“Appallingly worrisome is the recent protest by some groups in the Northern part of the country, as a resistance to any possible intervention of the US.

“The likes of Sheik Gumi have continued to speak against the planned intervention, insisting that Trump shouldn’t intervene.

“Why are they this desperate? It is of course due to the fact that their hands are not clean. If the government is serious, the likes of Sheik Gumi, the protesters and other suspected supporters of these extremisms ought to be arrested.

See also  ‘World’s oldest baby’ born in Ohio from 30-year-old frozen embryo

“The intervention of Trump is good. Anybody opposing the idea is probably a suspect, because I see no reason why a sane Nigerian would resist assistance to solve a problem that has lingered for donkey years without any sign of solution from our government.

“Some of them claim that Nigeria is a sovereign nation, hence another nation is not supposed to interfere in her issue, but the same Nigeria receives aid from US China, and other nations during economic quagmires and other emergencies such as disease outbreak. We should stop playing hanky panky games with serious national issues.”

On his part, Joseph Adah welcomed the threat of the US president, saying Nigeria’s poor masses are helpless at this point.

“Donald Trump’s “invasion of Nigeria” is a welcome idea that thousands of Nigerians will be happy about and of course, are eagerly waiting to see the reality of it,” he said.

Speaking, Emmanuel Ucha said the killing of innocent Nigerians has been going on for years.

He said, “Truth be told, the terrorism activities in Nigeria seem to have overpowered the Nigerian Government; therefore, the need for Trump to intervene and end the criminal activities against humanity a permanent end will be most cherished.”

Also speaking, Felix Sunday said the activities of the assailants are connected to those in authority, hence, the lingering nature of crises.

“The criminal activities of terrorism in Nigeria are perceived to have a deep connection with some leaders and that’s why some terrorists’ activities are carried out openly.

“The government of the day unfortunately is giving deaf ears to such serious cases, either for political reasons or reasons that are known to them at the detriment of helpless Nigerians and the activities keep going on unquestioned.

“An example of such a scenario is where a fellow Nigerian will be advising the Nigerian Government to ‘allow the terrorists to guard Nigerian forest in order for peace to reign’.

“This means the individual knows the terrorists and has serious business with the terrorists. Still, such fellows walk freely without being questioned. Therefore, foreign intervention is highly required,” he stated.

Chibueze Obi also welcomed the proposed invasion by President Donald J Trump, stressing that it’s a welcome development that will put an end to the criminal activities of terrorism in Nigeria, as well as their sponsors.

“Let’s not be deceived that Trump wants to wage war against Nigeria.

“It’s not a war against Nigeria as a country but against the terrorists and their sponsors in Nigeria,” he stated.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FBI Submits Tinubu’s Records To US Judge

Published

on

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has submitted records relating to President Bola Tinubu’s 1993 drug-trafficking and money-laundering case directly to a federal judge in Washington, D.C., court documents have shown.

According to Peoples Gazette, the materials were delivered to Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia under seal, meaning they are currently accessible only to the court as it considers whether to make the records public.

The submission followed a prolonged legal battle over a Freedom of Information Act request filed by American transparency campaigner Aaron Greenspan, who has been seeking access to Tinubu’s records from the FBI.

Court filings indicated that the bureau delivered the documents on Friday, August 28, after Howell ordered it to explain its continued refusal to release the records.

The documents were submitted without notifying Greenspan of their contents.

According to the filing, the records were “hand delivered to the Court on August 28, 2026 in compliance with this Court’s Minute Order dated August 20, 2026.”

Greenspan had originally sought the records through a FOIA application submitted in 2023. He worked with Nigerian journalist David Hundeyin in pursuing the request.

The case later became a dispute over how quickly the FBI was processing the request, with the agency repeatedly asking for more time.

Howell reportedly gave the FBI several opportunities to explain why it was withholding the records but grew increasingly dissatisfied with the delays.

The judge eventually set August 28 as the deadline for the bureau to comply with her directive.

See also  ‘World’s oldest baby’ born in Ohio from 30-year-old frozen embryo

The bureau had argued earlier that releasing the records could infringe on Tinubu’s privacy rights.

It also maintained that the Freedom of Information Act was primarily intended to promote transparency concerning government operations and records, rather than provide unrestricted access to information about private individuals.

The controversy surrounding the records dates back several years and is linked to allegations concerning Tinubu’s activities in the United States in the early 1990s.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Why My FBI, DEA Records Should Remain Secret – Tinubu Tells US Court

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has given the United States District Court for the District of Columbia four reasons why his records with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) should not be released.

It was reports that the president gave his reasons in filings by his lawyers, Christopher Carmichael, Victor Henderson and Oluwole Afolabi.

He argued that the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act precluded disclosure and there was no public interest in the matter.

Tinubu also said there was no public interest to balance and the plaintiff had ulterior motives for demanding documents with his name on them.

The President’s submission was in response to a request by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan, which sought disclosure of the records under the US Freedom of Information Act.

Greenspan had argued that his requests concerned the “sitting President of Nigeria…” and “a nation of over 230 million people whose daily lives are directly affected by President Tinubu’s decisions”.

Tinubu, according to filings by his lawyer, urged the US District Court to reject the bid because it amounted to an attempt to obtain private information for political purposes in Nigeria.

The President’s lawyers noted that the request sought access to information about government activities.

They specifically rejected the argument that Nigerians’ interest in Tinubu’s background constituted a public interest recognised by US law.

The team also rejected an argument on the President’s fitness for office, stating that “the asserted ‘public interest in Tinubu’s own fitness for office’ is not an interest FOIA recognises or one that needs to be balanced.”

See also  DIG Frank Mba, others retire, seven AIGs for promotion

The lawyers further argued that the records sought were protected by privacy provisions under FOIA and the US Privacy Act.

“The redacted information sought by the plaintiff is exempt from disclosure,” they stated, citing Exemption 7(C), which protects personal information contained in law-enforcement records.

The President’s legal team relied on a 1989 US Supreme Court decision, Department of Justice v Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to argue that FOIA was designed to allow the public to know “what the government is up to” rather than provide access to information about private citizens.

They argued that Greenspan was seeking “disclosure of information about private citizens that is accumulated in various governmental files,” which, they said, “reveals little or nothing about an agency’s own conduct.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu’s FBI Records: ADC, NDC Demand Release, Say Nigerians Deserve Truth

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s records with United States law enforcement agencies has taken another turn with opposition parties demanding that the documents be made public.

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) have questioned the President’s decision to oppose the release of the records, insisting that Nigerians deserve to know the truth about his past.

Naija News reports that the fresh controversy comes as details of submissions made by Tinubu’s lawyers before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia emerged.

In the filings, the President’s legal team, led by Christopher Carmichael, Victor Henderson and Oluwole Afolabi, gave reasons why his unredacted records with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) should not be released to the public.

Tinubu’s lawyers argued that the records were protected under the US Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.

The legal team maintained that the information being sought contained private details from law enforcement files and therefore fell under provisions that exempt such records from public disclosure.

The lawyers also argued that there was no recognized public interest under US law strong enough to justify releasing the records.

According to them, the argument that Nigerians have an interest in knowing about Tinubu’s background does not amount to the kind of public interest recognized under the Freedom of Information Act.

They further rejected the argument that the documents could be necessary to determine the President’s fitness for public office, saying such an interest was not one that the US law was designed to address.

See also  Fake agency probe: ICPC report clears Presidency, indicts embattled DG

Tinubu’s legal team also questioned the motive behind the request, arguing that the documents were being sought largely for political purposes in Nigeria.

The lawyers said the filings by the American transparency activist, Aaron Greenspan, showed that his main interest was obtaining government documents bearing Tinubu’s name.

They urged the court not to allow the FOIA process to be used as a means of accessing private information about an individual simply because he is the President of Nigeria.

The legal team also dismissed suggestions that the records could expose a secret prosecution or an agreement by US authorities not to prosecute Tinubu, describing such claims as speculative and unsupported by evidence.

The lawyers further argued that the fact that some information about Tinubu’s past had previously entered the public domain did not automatically remove his right to privacy over other details contained in government files.

The President Should Come Out Clean – ADC

Reacting to the development, ADC spokesperson, Bolaji Abdullahi, described the President’s opposition to the release of the records as suspicious.

Abdullahi, who spoke with a correspondent on Saturday, said Tinubu should allow the records to be released if he wanted to put the controversy surrounding his past to rest.

“Why is the President opposing the release of his past records? That is suspicious. The President should allow them (records) to be released to clear himself.

“The President should come out clean. He should be the one calling for the records to be released if he has nothing to hide because this is not good for him and the image of the country,” he said.

See also  ‘₦900,000 For A Single Room, We Work All Year To Pay Rent’ – Residents Lament Lagos Housing Costs

Nigerians Deserve To Know – Says NDC

The National Publicity Secretary of the NDC, Osa Director, also called on the President to allow the records to be made public.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Saturday, Director rejected the argument that the request for Tinubu’s records was simply a political move by the opposition.

According to him, the President should use the opportunity to clear the air over an issue that has remained in the public domain for more than two decades.

“When a man commits an offence and he says, please, don’t blame me because it is the devil, does that mean he should not face the consequence of his action because it is the devil? That is the question the President should answer.

“Whether it is the opposition or not, if the issue wasn’t there, the opposition would not capitalise on it. Why did the opposition not ask the FBI to release records on our presidential candidate, Peter Obi, or Atiku? That is not an excuse,” Director said.

He argued that the controversy would continue to resurface as long as the matter remained unresolved.

“Nigerians deserve to know and in the interest of the President. He deserves to clear the air. This case has been hanging on since his time as a governor. It is over 20 years.

“Even me, as an opposition, am getting bored. It is time, once and for all, that he should clear the air to allow the issue to be buried,” he added.

Naija News reports that the controversy over Tinubu’s US records dates back several years and became a major political issue during the build-up to the 2023 presidential election.

See also  Corruption: Many people in public office today were not well brought up - Emir of Kano, Sanusi II

At the centre of the matter are records relating to a 1993 US civil forfeiture proceeding involving $460,000 held in an account linked to Tinubu.

US authorities had alleged that the funds represented proceeds of narcotics trafficking or were connected to prohibited financial transactions.

Meanwhile, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) had maintained during the presidential election litigation that the case was a civil forfeiture proceeding and did not amount to a criminal conviction.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending