Connect with us

Crime

Read how IGP’s special forces arrested controversial PFIPC DG in Osun hideout

Published

on

The Nigeria Police Force on Tuesday arrested Adeniyi Adeyemi, the self-styled Director-General of the alleged Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC), following a bench warrant issued by a Federal High Court in Abuja, after he failed to appear for his arraignment on an eight-count charge bordering on alleged conspiracy, forgery and impersonation.

Justice Mohammed Umar ordered Adeyemi’s arrest after granting an oral application by the prosecution, led by Wisdom Madaki, following the defendant’s absence when the case was called.

The judge granted an oral application by the prosecution after Adeyemi failed to appear when the matter, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/562/2025, was called.

Opposing the application, Adeyemi’s counsel, Genesis Francis, told the court that his client feared for his life and had written to President Bola Tinubu over the alleged threats.

According to the lawyer, Adeyemi intended to remain alive to defend himself in court.

Responding, Justice Umar said, “The court will help him be alive,” before ordering that a bench warrant be issued for Adeyemi’s arrest.

The judge subsequently adjourned the case until September 30, 2026, for arraignment.

The Personal Assistant to the Force Public Relations Officer, Aminu Koji, confirmed Adeyemi’s arrest in a terse statement to journalists.

Koji said Adeyemi was arrested in Osun State by operatives of the Intelligence Response Team.

“We have just confirmed the arrest of Mr. Adeniyi Adeyemi by a team of the Intelligence Response Team in Osun State. Thank you,” Koji said.

The arrest was earlier seen in a video released by TVC News, showing Adeyemi in police custody.

The police had filed the eight-count charge against Adeyemi on November 27, 2025, accusing him and two other suspects identified simply as Femi and Anu, who are said to be at large, of conspiracy, forgery and impersonation in connection with the operation of the purported Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, an organisation the Presidency has repeatedly said does not exist.

Inside Adeyemi’s arrest

Before he was eventually nabbed in Osun State, The PUNCH gathered that Adeniyi had been trailed by a team from the Department of State Services for more than a week.

He was said to have switched off his mobile phones for about two days, making it difficult to locate him.

It was further learnt that the DSS team later retreated, as members of the police Intelligence Response Team led by CSP Moses Lohor, moved into the state and continued trailing Adeyemi.

Lohor previously served as the Commander of the Anti-Kidnapping Squad for the Osun State Police Command and had been involved in high-profile security operations and controversies.

He is widely regarded by many Osun residents as one of the key security officers who contributed significantly to the peace and stability enjoyed in Ilesa and other parts of the state during his tenure. Following his transfer, concerns were raised by some members of the public about the security situation in the state and the impact of his redeployment.

In 2024, following the shooting of the Chairman of Osun State Motor Transport System, Comrade Iyanda Alowonle, the Inspector General of Police ordered the arrest and prosecution of Lohor, who was the then Head of Police Anti-Kidnapping Squad in Osun State, along with members of his team for attempted murder.

See also  2027: Atiku delays ADC membership card collection amid rumoured Jonathan comeback

Lohor had shot Mr Alowonle in the abdomen at the police station after his arrest over a domestic brawl with a neighbour.

A security source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the issue, said Adeyemi was arrested by the IRT Tuesday morning and informed Osun State Police Command Commissioner, Ibrahim Gotan, after the operation had been concluded.

“The arrest (of Adeyemi) took place on Tuesday morning by the IRT squad, who immediately moved him to Abuja. After he was arrested, he was taken to Ibadan and from there to Abuja,” our source said.

When contacted, Osun State Police Command spokesman, Abiodun Ojelabi, confirmed the arrest but refused to give further information.

Threat to life?

Tuesday’s proceedings marked another setback in the criminal case, which has suffered a series of adjournments, largely because the defendant has yet to take his plea.

Adeyemi’s absence from court came barely a day after he publicly alleged that his life was under threat and asked President Tinubu to guarantee his safety before he could submit himself to law enforcement authorities.

In an open letter addressed to the President on Monday, Adeyemi welcomed Tinubu’s directive ordering the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission to investigate the PFIPC controversy but argued that the anti-graft agency could not conduct an independent investigation because it operates under the Executive arm of government.

He therefore urged the President to constitute an independent panel of inquiry, insisting that the issues surrounding the controversial organisation extended beyond his person.

Adeyemi also claimed that surrendering to security agencies under the current circumstances would amount to signing his own death warrant.

He alleged that he had received “verified, highly reliable intelligence” that he would be eliminated if he surfaced in an unprotected environment, adding that the reported death of one Dolapo Babatunde Tanimola, whom he described as a key intermediary in the matter, reinforced his fears.

The Federal Government, through the police, filed the charges on November 27, 2025.

According to the charge sheet, Adeyemi and the two other defendants allegedly forged several official documents, including a purported presidential appointment letter, State House letterheads, a conveyance approval for the establishment of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, requests for approval of staff accounts, applications for office space and letters seeking collaboration with a federal ministry.

Count Two of the charge reads, “That you Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Mathew ‘M’ 38 years of 2nd Floor, Federal Secretariat Complex Abuja, Femi, surname unknown and Anu, surname unknown, now at large, on or about 8th day of March, 2024 within the Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court forged appointment letter purported to have been appointed by His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, President Federal Republic of Nigeria, and signed by Chief of Staff to the President Femi Gbajabiamila and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1(2)(c) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act, Cap M17, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria.”

See also  I don’t see the hunger Nigerians complain about — Tinubu’s aide

The prosecution also accused Adeyemi of falsely presenting himself as the Director-General of the purported council, contrary to Section 179 of the Penal Code.

Count Five states, “That you, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Mathew ‘M’ 38 years of 2nd Floor, Federal Secretariat Complex Abuja, Femi surname unknown and Anu surname unknown now at large, sometime between 2024 and 2025 within the Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court falsely personates as the Director General of Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 179 of the Penal Code.”

If convicted on the forgery-related counts, Adeyemi faces up to 21 years’ imprisonment without the option of a fine, while the impersonation charge carries a maximum sentence of three years’ imprisonment or a fine.

Speaking with journalists after the proceedings, Francis said he had not seen or spoken with his client in over a month.

“Someone has to be alive before justice is heard in this case. I cannot reach my client. I haven’t seen him for over a month. It’s sad, but that is the reality of the situation.

“A bench warrant has been issued against him. The matter has been adjourned till September 30. We can only wait and see how this matter unfolds,” he said.

NBA reacts

The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Afam Osigwe (SAN), said President Tinubu’s directive to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission to conduct a special investigation into the alleged fraud involving the controversial PFIPC could lead to a wider probe beyond the suspects already before the court.

Osigwe stated this in a telephone interview on Tuesday, after Adeyemi’s arrest.

Reacting to questions on whether the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, who has been linked to the controversy, should also be arrested in the interest of justice, Osigwe said the decision rested entirely with investigators.

“I’m not the police,” the NBA president said. “The President has ordered that a special investigation be carried out by the ICPC.”

According to him, the fresh investigation could result in more individuals being invited if the evidence so warrants.

“If there are persons of interest who were invited for the investigation and if that special investigation takes place, then it means they may likely invite others whose names have been mentioned,” he said.

Osigwe cautioned against drawing conclusions before the investigation was concluded.

“The law does not deal with speculation. As of today, he is the only person charged in court,” he said, referring to Adeyemi.

He maintained that the Federal High Court acted within its powers by issuing a bench warrant after the defendant allegedly failed to honour the court’s proceedings.

“If he fails to attend court, the court will be right to make an order for his arrest or revoke his bail if he is already on bail,” he said.

The NBA president also suggested that the President’s directive for a fresh ICPC investigation may indicate concerns about the scope of the initial investigation.

“I think you should be interested in the effect of the President’s order on these 10 men charged. Does it not show that the President is not quite satisfied that a comprehensive investigation into the matter has been carried out?” he asked.

See also  Delta police command arrests officers filmed counting cash in patrol vehicle

He said the expanded investigation would help determine whether additional persons should face prosecution or whether the existing charges should proceed based on a fuller assessment of the evidence.

Also speaking on the arrest, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Prof. Sam Erugo, said the Nigeria Police Force ought to invite the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, for questioning over allegations made against him by the self-acclaimed Director-General of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, Adeniyi Adeyemi, but acknowledged that such a move is unlikely while he remains in office.

Erugo spoke in an interview following Adeyemi’s arrest by operatives of the Nigeria Police Force in Osun State on Tuesday, over his failure to appear in court.

Reacting to questions on whether Gbajabiamila should also be investigated, given Adeyemi’s repeated allegations against him, the senior lawyer said the law ordinarily required investigators to question anyone whose name featured in a criminal investigation.

“The right thing should be for the police to invite Gbajabiamila and interrogate him. Let him write statements on those things. That should be the right thing,” Erugo said.

He, however, stated that the realities of political power make such a step difficult in practice.

“He’s not a governor, so he does not enjoy constitutional immunity, but he has all the powers. Do you know what it means to be Chief of Staff to the President,” he said.

Describing the situation as one of “the limits of the law,” Erugo said there is often a gap between what the law requires and what happens in practice.

“As long as he’s there, it’s very difficult for the police. If the police should invite him now they’ll be looking for trouble,” he said.

According to him, the only realistic path to such an investigation would be if President Bola Tinubu suspends his Chief of Staff.

“If the President decides to suspend him and tell him to go and face investigation, but you know he will not do that,” Erugo added.

The senior advocate also criticised Adeyemi for allegedly evading trial, describing the decision as legally unwise.

“I don’t know why the man is running. If he sought advice from good lawyers, they should tell him to go to trial,” he said.

Rather than abscond, Erugo advised Adeyemi to use the judicial process to compel witnesses, including Gbajabiamila, to testify if their evidence is relevant to his defence.

He maintained that facing trial was a better legal strategy than attempting to avoid prosecution.

“Running away from trial is not the best. Running will not solve his problem,” Erugo said.

Adeyemi was arrested in Osun State after the Federal High Court in Abuja issued a bench warrant for his arrest following his alleged failure to appear for proceedings in the criminal case against him.

The case is linked to alleged fraud involving the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime

Police invite VeryDarkMan, demand evidence of checkpoint kidnapping claims

Published

on

The Nigeria Police Force has invited social media activist Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, to provide evidence backing his allegation that some police officers at checkpoints collude with kidnappers and bandits.

The Force, in a statement on Thursday by the Force Public Relations Officer, Ani Iniedu, said it had taken note of comments made by Otse at the recent Nigerian Bar Association’s conference in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital.

VeryDarkMan had alleged that police officers manning checkpoints along major highways identify wealthy travellers and relay information about their identities and movements to kidnappers, thereby facilitating their abduction for ransom.

Reacting, the police described the allegation as serious, unsubstantiated and unfairly damaging to the institution.

The statement said, “The Nigeria Police Force firmly rejects these allegations as unsubstantiated and unfairly damaging to an institution entrusted with the protection of millions of Nigerians. Allegations of this gravity demand a corresponding standard of evidence, and that standard has not yet been met.

“Accordingly, the Nigeria Police Force hereby invites Mr Martins Vincent Otse to produce, without delay, the evidence upon which he based these serious allegations, including any evidence that police personnel at checkpoints identify wealthy individuals and subsequently transmit information about them to kidnappers for the purpose of facilitating their abduction.”

The Force said any evidence presented by the activist would be treated with urgency and thoroughly investigated.

It urged members of the public with credible evidence of police misconduct to approach the appropriate authorities rather than relying solely on public allegations.

The police maintained that officers deployed to checkpoints nationwide were assigned to prevent crime, detect criminal activities and protect citizens, rather than facilitate kidnapping.

See also  Night of terror in Zamfara

According to the statement, police personnel routinely confront criminal elements, and have suffered attacks and casualties in the course of their duties.

The police said, “Indeed, these same police officers routinely confront the very criminal elements alleged to be receiving such information. Police personnel have been ambushed, attacked and killed, while police stations, formations and operational assets have equally been targeted by terrorists, kidnappers and other violent criminals.”

The Force also said that where individual officers were found to have compromised their duties, they would face internal disciplinary measures and prosecution in accordance with the law.

It, however, cautioned against blanket accusations that could demoralise its personnel and undermine public trust in the institution.

“The sacrifices of our personnel and the integrity of the institution will not be casually diminished by unverified allegations. Anyone with credible evidence of misconduct should bring it forward through the appropriate channels for investigation in accordance with the law.

“The Force calls on members of the public to exercise responsibility in making and sharing allegations concerning national security institutions and to distinguish between legitimate criticism, which strengthens accountability, and unsubstantiated claims, which can endanger public trust and national security, ” the police said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Crime

EFCC offers 5% reward for leads on stolen assets abroad

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has offered whistleblowers up to five per cent of recovered assets for actionable information leading to the recovery of funds and properties allegedly stashed abroad by corrupt Nigerians.

Olukoyede urged individuals with credible information on the location of Nigerian assets suspected to be proceeds of corruption anywhere in the world to approach the commission, promising financial incentives upon successful recovery.

In a statement on Wednesday, EFFC spokesman Dele Oyewale said the commission’s chairman, Ola Olukoyede, disclosed this while delivering a lecture at the 43rd International Symposium on Economic Crime in Cambridge, United Kingdom.

“I welcome all of you to the world of whistleblowing. If any one of you is privy to where Nigerian assets are stolen or taken to anywhere in the world, we have an incentive for you; between 2.5 per cent and 5 per cent, it’s going to go back to you upon recovery.

“That is an incentive we have put in place to encourage people to come forward to give information about stolen assets,” he was quoted as saying.

The EFCC chairman said the reward could turn credible whistleblowers into millionaires, depending on the value of assets recovered from the information supplied.

“You never know if you give any information here, some of you may leave this place, multi-millionaire in your lifetime,” Olukoyede said, drawing applause from participants.

He said the initiative was aimed at strengthening the commission’s access to credible intelligence in tracing assets moved out of Nigeria through illicit means.

See also  I don’t see the hunger Nigerians complain about — Tinubu’s aide

Olukoyede disclosed that the EFCC had recovered and secured the forfeiture of cash and assets worth more than $500m for the Federal Government within the first three years of his administration.

“Within three years of my assumption of office, we’ve been able to forfeit both cash and assets worth over half a billion dollars to the government,” he said.

He attributed the recoveries to the resourcefulness and professionalism of EFCC investigators, a vibrant judiciary and access to credible intelligence.

The anti-graft agency chairman also highlighted Nigeria’s non-conviction-based asset forfeiture framework, which he said enabled the commission to pursue suspected proceeds of crime without necessarily waiting for a criminal conviction.

According to him, the framework is similar to approaches used in countries, including Australia and Canada.

“We have something similar to what is obtainable in Australia and Canada that empowers us to apply the forfeiture to proceeds of what is suspected to be proceeds of crime,” he said.

Olukoyede said the mechanism had enabled the government to secure the forfeiture of assets including an aircraft, a university, estates and houses suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of crime.

He cited the recovery of 752 housing units linked to former Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Godwin Emefiele, as well as an ongoing investigation involving former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN).

He said the investigation into Malami’s assets led to the forfeiture of 48 properties out of 57 properties allegedly traced to him.

“Sometimes last year, I opened investigations upon reasonable suspicion of criminal abuse of office by the immediate past Attorney-General of Nigeria.

See also  Delta police command arrests officers filmed counting cash in patrol vehicle

“We discovered that within eight years of his being in office, we were able to trace about 57 such properties to him. We’ve been able to forfeit about 48,” he said.

The 43rd International Symposium on Economic Crime, which is being held in Cambridge, brings together anti-corruption experts and practitioners from different parts of the world.

Olukoyede’s presentation was delivered on the third day of the week-long symposium.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Crime

Drug lords’ assets must be seized – Marwa

Published

on

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Brig Gen Buba Marwa (retd.), has said arrests alone cannot defeat drug trafficking without a corresponding effort to seize and recover the proceeds of crime.

Marwa stated this on Tuesday while delivering a presentation titled, “Criminal Property and the Criminal Process: How Can We Make It More Effective?” at the ongoing 43rd Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime, organised by the Centre for Geopolitics, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

This was contained in a statement by the spokesman of the agency, Femi Babafemi.

Speaking before an international gathering of judges, law enforcement chiefs, financial intelligence experts and academics, the NDLEA chairman said the success of the criminal justice system should not be measured solely by the number of convictions secured.

He said the process should also be assessed by its ability to make crime unprofitable.

According to him, “A trafficker who loses his liberty but retains his fortune has not truly been defeated. His wealth can finance another operation, support his associates and sustain the criminal enterprise.”

Marwa said the ultimate objective should be to deny criminals the proceeds of their crimes promptly and lawfully while preserving the value of seized assets.

He likened arresting a trafficker without dismantling his financial empire to “pruning a weed at the stem while leaving its roots undisturbed,” warning that illicit wealth could resurface under different names, front companies or jurisdictions.

The NDLEA boss outlined six strategies adopted by the agency to strengthen asset recovery, anchored on the NDLEA Act 2004, the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act 2022 and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022.

See also  Anthony Joshua's driver discharged from hospital and 'faces prosecution' for reckless driving in fatal crash

He cited the forfeiture of the Hook Hotel, a property linked to a fugitive drug suspect, as an example of the agency’s use of non-conviction-based forfeiture.

According to him, the property was sold for $4.2m, with the proceeds paid into the Federal Government’s forfeited assets account domiciled with the Central Bank of Nigeria.

Marwa said the development demonstrated that fleeing the country could not enable a fugitive to retain the benefits of alleged criminal activities.

He also disclosed that NDLEA investigators and prosecutors were now working together from the commencement of cases, a development he said had shortened the period between arrest and the securing of restraint orders.

The NDLEA chairman said the agency froze bank accounts containing more than $7m in the previous month and secured interim forfeiture orders covering multibillion-naira assets, including filling stations, multi-storey buildings and exotic vehicles allegedly linked to a fugitive methamphetamine syndicate.

On the case involving Nigerian businessman Amadi Simon, whom the agency described as a suspected drug baron, Marwa said three hotels linked to the suspect were placed under professional asset managers instead of being shut down.

He said the measure was aimed at preserving the value of the hotels as going concerns pending the outcome of the trial.

Marwa further highlighted the use of provisions relating to unexplained wealth and living beyond legitimate means as investigative triggers, as well as the interlocutory sale of perishable and depreciating assets to prevent their values from declining before final judgment.

He said the measures had been incorporated into Nigeria’s National Drug Control Master Plan 2026–2030, making financial disruption of drug trafficking organisations a sustained national priority.

See also  SEE FULL LIST: Nigeria, 74 others spared as US judge strikes down visa ban

The NDLEA chairman identified speed, preservation of value and institutionalisation as three principles guiding the agency’s asset recovery efforts.

He, however, acknowledged challenges, including delays in mutual legal assistance, limited forensic accounting capacity and the need to balance the rights of accused persons with the responsibility of the state to preserve assets pending trial.

Marwa called for faster international cooperation and stronger cross-border recognition of non-conviction-based forfeiture orders.

He reaffirmed the agency’s readiness to strengthen partnerships with foreign jurisdictions and institutions in efforts to dismantle the financial structures supporting drug trafficking.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending